Science topic

Lab on a Chip - Science topic

Explore the latest questions and answers in Lab on a Chip, and find Lab on a Chip experts.
Questions related to Lab on a Chip
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
5 answers
I have started working on microfluidics and their application as organ-on-a-chip. I want to learn about the fluidodynamic and theoretical/practical aspects of this technology. What references would you recommend? Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thermodynamic perspectives on liquid–liquid droplet reactors for biochemical applications[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2020, 49(18): 6555-6567.
I hope this impactful paper will address your problem.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
Hi All,
Normally when we are preparing the PDMS, we usually use Si as mold . Assume that you fabricate your PDMS mold in 3D-Printer instead of patterns on Si fabricated by SU-8 . Do you think that it negatively leads to bonding of PDMS-Glass because of the surface roughness of PDMS pilled off from 3D-printed mold ? Which type of mold for obtaining PDMS is the good for glass-pdms bonding? If you have any experiences about 3D-printed mold for PDMS, would you share us ?
The second question is that Oxygen/air plasma cleaning or RF etch is widely used to make PDMS blocks stickable on to glass. Is there any other way to achieve the same?
Third Question is that lets say that you remove PDMS from your chip. Then, if you want to clean it, which type of solvent should be used or prepared to clean PDMS dirtiness?
Sincerely,
Osman
Relevant answer
Answer
3D printed mold will be rough and it will definity affect your PDMS-Glass bonding.
3rd Question - If there is a slight amount of dirt on the PDMS after you remove it from the mold, the best way to remove that is by using scotch tape.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
9 answers
Hi all,
I am trying to fabricate PDMS based microfluidic devices, after plasma treatment the PDMS does not bond to glass for some reason. I have tried to drop a water droplet to see if it changes the contact angle and I have seen increased hydrophilicity on PDMS. I cannot control the plasma power nor the pressure since the device I am using has no pressure gauge or power control.
Briefly, after 2 min of vacuum I apply 2 min of plasma ( I can see the plasma forming). I have tried to silanize the glass and PDMS, wash the glass with ethanol, heat treatment after plasma and PDMS-PDMS bonding. None of which worked out. Can anyone comment on what is the issue here?
Thanks in advance.
Relevant answer
Answer
Plasma bonding is a delicate balance of "activation" and "destruction" of the PDMS surface. You want to destroy either the C-H bonds or the S-C bonds such that they are replaced with C-OH or S-OH groups. But if you go too far with the plasma, you'll either create too many -OH groups to the point that they start interacting with each other or you start breaking Si-O bonds in the back-bone of the elastomer. In the former case, you are left with too few -OH groups to make a sufficient bond and the surface will be mostly closely packed islands of SiO2 with very few -OH groups available at the surface. In the latter, you "ash" the surface to the point that you can't get any covalent bonds to form that are still covalently bonded to the bulk.
As Jasper Giesler suggested, you should try significantly lower treatment times and possibly lower your power. My lab typically uses around 20W for 20-40 seconds.
One additional detail is in the timing of the contact after plasma treatment. You need to be relatively quick getting you sample out of the chamber and placing it on the surface to be bonded. Much more than 60 seconds after the plasma is turned off and your bond strength will begin to decrease rapidly. One way aound this is to use a drop or two of methanol on the bonding surface. This also allows you to move the PDMS around a bit to get the two surfaces aligned.
Best of luck!
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
5 answers
Hello everyone,
I'm looking for a software thats adapted for drawing complex designs of microchannels. Typically i have 2 inlets, 3 outlets and 100 microchannels in between. For the time being, i am using Clewin and Klayout, but i seek something more adapted for such complex features and this considerable number of channels. Do you have any recommendations. Do you know of a software to design such chips and able to export in .cif format that permits me to make my lithography masks ?
Thanks in advance,
Mohammad Baz
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you Shayan Davani and Mohammad Taheripur for your recommendations, i will consider both.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
7 answers
Is it necessary to do SAM before Fibronectin? With this modification, how long does it take for cells to spread on top of an electrode?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Tien,
It depends whether you want to fix the cells, to immobilize the cells, or capture the cells with their specific antibodies.
So, kindly elaborate more information to give you the appropriate advice/answer.
Good luck,
Rabeay
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
19 answers
I have been recently trying to cast and cure Sylgard in 3D printed master molds made of resin but the sylgard doesn't cure. I have tried to cure it at different temperatures but still it doesn't cure.
I wonder if anyone has ever had this problem before and how you could fix it.
Thank you.
Relevant answer
Answer
The best way to cure PDMS on SLA 3D printed structure is to post-cure your print for additional time and temp 80c for 3 hours or 150c for 15 mins (glass/Al plate). I used Pt/Fe based PDMS catalyst.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
1 answer
Hello fellow researchers!
I am trying to find a fluorocarbon oil that has a refractive index same as or greater than that of water (1.33). The closest one I can find so far is 1.3 (FC-170).
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Senthilkumar Duraivel , Vitreon (perfluoroperhydrophenanthrene) has RI = 1.335 (close to water) and is both non-toxic and non-volatile, according to a work of Georgalas et al. 2011 reported in the review by Wright et al:
In addition, some perfluoropolyehters could also reach refractive indexes close or higher than water.
Hope it helps
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
4 answers
Dear All,
I have to align PDMS on LiNbO3, my channel size is 100 micron.
My process parameters are 0.3 Torr, O2 plasma treatment for 2 mins. 
I put a drop of ethanol on PDMS to align on LiNbO3, I use my finger to move 2-3 times, after that heat at 80 C.
The problem is PDMS always has leakage near the inlet.
Anyone has an idea what should I do ?
Best Regards,
Yannapol S.
Relevant answer
Answer
Well, though I saw this topic a bit late nevertheless it is never too late to share knowledge :)
For me, I coated the Lithium Niobate with 100 nm of SiO2 later and then bonding becomes similarly strong as with glass.
Also, keep in mind that this will also give you another advantage that IDTs will be prevented from damage and the shelf-life increases.
Anyways good luck.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
11 answers
I have used a glass(soda-lime glass)bonding with PDMS after treating with plasma, however, the bonding is too weak or otherwise it can only bond on part of the whole structure.
SO I'm eager to know what kind of glass should use when I need to bond PDMS.(the plasma treatment procedure is sure OK, and I'm doing the lab on a CD, so a hole need to be drilled in the center of the glass disc )
Relevant answer
Answer
I think if your surfaces are flat and clean, and plasma recipe is proper then soda lime glass should work just fine. Nevertheless, I've used ThermoFisher's Gold Seal slide glasses (https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/3011-002#/3011-002) and they bond well.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
13 answers
I am looking to fabricate PDMS pillars which are 0.5um or 1um in diameter, and up to 10um tall. Pattern definition and etch on a silicon substrate to create the mould, using E-beam and RIE etching doesn't present too much of a problem.
When I come to mould my PDMS against this, does anyone have any advice on getting decent demoulding without too much breakage/stretching/deformation? Will this even present a problem?
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
7 answers
Hi! After weeks of testing we get control of the drop size, by put oil pump vertical and adjust the oil flow rate. However, we found the drop size becomes crazily deviated when trying to get drop smaller than the channel size. The chip adopt classical "+" geometry. We have 2 chip: diameter 70um and 80um. Both hard to get drop <70 and <80.
Is it necessary to get a smaller chip if we want drop diameter in 65um!
Thank You
Relevant answer
Answer
Another suggestion: If you can reduce your acrylamide concentration, your final particle will be (much) smaller.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
Hi,
I have a microfluidic channel with a very low aspect ratio (100 um tall x 2 mm wide). When I flow cells though this channel I notice cells move at two separate speeds. I am trying to figure out exactly why this is and how to resolve the issue.
The channel is made on 3 sides with PDMS and on the last side by SU-8.
My thinking thus far is that in a low aspect ratio channel the cells will inertially focus into two equilibrium positions in the vertical axis of the channel: But these two positions are not at the same spot on the parabolic velocity profile and thus have different speeds.
Where the cells find an equilibrium is a function of the wall interaction and the sheer gradient lift force. Cells at each equilibrium will have the same fluid velocity, density and size. Thus there must be a difference in the velocity profile to cause this discrepancy. I assume this would be because the materials are different. Something to do with the slip length, the surface charge (zeta potential) or surface roughness.
Has anyone had a similar issue? Any suggestions for how I could resolve this issue (excluding changing the geometry much)? Does my thinking make sense, perhaps there is another way to explain why I see cells moving at two different speeds?
Best,
David
Relevant answer
Answer
May I ask cell diameter and mean flow velocity? Also, does this happen along the whole channel width? With this aspect ratio I wonder if PDMS in the middle of the channel buckling, resulting in different channel thickness.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
9 answers
Hi!
We realise the dripping in our microfluid chip (the + cross).
Yet we wonder how can we control our droplet size to ~=70um sphere (the channel is a semicircle in 70um diameter)
Can we calculate the drop size, using Weber number and capillary number or any other parameter?
Thanks!
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
I am working with an microfluidic chip engineering company whose manufacturing approach can create super smooth round channels with integrated connectors and no tooling requirements, they are interested in creating new configurations to support various applications in biodiscovery and analysis but would like to understand the current limitations of microfluidic chips and systems - is it cell damage, bubbles, poor mixing, cost to mfg, engineering limitations, etc? If you are working with cell analysis or other biologic applications what adaptations to your microfluidic system would make your research easier?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear all, I am not really concerned by this area of research, but for the sake of curiosity I show some interest. Please find the following links, hope they will be usefull. The book of the last link if you find it interesting then I can mail it to you. My Regards
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
8 answers
I am performing a 2-d simulation in COMSOL in which a microfluidc device separates different cell particles using dielectrophoresis. I want to compute drag and dielectrophoretic forces acting on different particles at different locations. I have tried the built-in expressions from COMSOL, but they do not work (maybe I do not know how to do such an action). Does anyone know how I could do that?
Sincerely,
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Jasper,
Thank you for your reply. I will try it out.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
1 answer
Hi everyone. I'm currently working with Dolomite Microfluidic system for preparation on PLGA based microparticles, but I seem to be encountering some issues which have been giving me some trouble for some time already.
1) I'm using a PLGA/DCM solution as my droplet phase and I have a feeling that I'm having a loss of DCM which impacts my particles as the PLGA solution then gets more concentrated.
2) The flow throughout the run is also somehow inconsistent and flow rate starts decreasing and pressure increasing after some time, even though no clogging or blockage is visible under the microscope. I believe this second issue might be related to the first question, despite the blockage also occasionally coming from tubes/pump containing the continuous phase (PVA aqueous solution).
Would anyone be able to help me for a way to reduce this apparent loss of solvent? For information, I use a glass vial that fits into the P-pump pressure chamber, and screw the chamber lid on with the tube placed in the glass vial.
Thanks in advance! - Julia Shih
Relevant answer
Answer
Try DMSO as a solvent. You get resolved your problem.
Try our PLGA.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
1 answer
Lateral Flow Immunoassay system were used for newborn screening test and these systems consist of some parts including plasma separation membrane part, I found lots of plasma separation membrane pad but they used for lower hematocrit sample like adult blood and because of higher hematocrit blood of neonates I think that these systems use special filters for separating plasma from blood and I want to know about that.
thank you
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Ali,
I believe some of them are made of Asymmetric polysulfone. But you can find other types of filters in the publications below, which are more on the R&D academic side. I hope this helps.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
What simulation program do you advise me to perform the simulation of the movement of a magnetic nanoparticle in a fluid in a lab_on_a_chip, influenced by an external magnetic field?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Montero,
There are several simulation programs you can use to simulate the magnetic nanoparticles movement in a fluid such as Comsol and Ansys fluent. I think Comsol is the easiest one and is more convenient. However, i prefer to work by Ansys fluent software which is better and more comprehensive. Its worth noting that you need UDF code in Ansys fluent if you want to simulate the magnetic nanofluid behavior under the influence of an external magnetic field.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
1 answer
I was wondering how to find non fluorescent plastic coverslips for optical in vivo imaging. We now use glass coverslips 3mm in diameter, 0,15mm thick, but want to find a plastic substitute. According to this paper http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16286964, PDMS seems to be good. But I cannot find any commercial supplier of coverslips made of this material. Could anyone be so kind to provide some advice?
Relevant answer
Answer
This is a very old thread; in the past, I used to purchase plastic sheets of all kind of types from McMaster, the ones that come with a protective film, and test them myself. 100 micron thickness (4 mil) is a very common size for plastics. I remember finding that acetyllellulose used for dialysis had the least amount of fluorescence. I think scientific companies markup their plastic coverglasses by orders of mag, and it's better to just get a roll of plastic and cut it yourself.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
12 answers
I'm using su-8 2025 on glass and want it to be part of my final fluidic device, but I'm having a lot of detaching problems even before entering water. How could I improve it, and what kind of promotors can I use?
Relevant answer
Answer
I would suggest you to expose your sample to oxygen plasma to activate the surface before spin coating SU-8. All the baking steps are important in the processing of SU-8. Most importantly, do a long hard baking step at temperature close to 140 degree. Also cool down the sample slowly after hard-baking (you may just turn off the hot plate and let the sample cool down with the hot plate). Stress is an important reason behind the delamination of SU-8 from glass surface. Controlled hard-baking will help you in managing the stress effects.
Jose
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I am spin coating PDMS over a glass wafer with patterned metal. It is important to me that this PDMS surface is smooth. Is there an easy way to measure the surface roughness?
I was planning on using Bruker Contour GT-K Optical Optical Profilometer, but I have been informed that since the PDMS is transparent it will be difficulty to get accurate measurement.
Another suggestion was AFM, but I am not trained on it so it would take time for me to be able to get measurement.
Any other suggestions?
Thank you for the help,
David
Relevant answer
Answer
Might be a silly idea, but if you are looking at nanoscale surface roughness you could try placing a drop of water on your PDMS and measuring the contact angle.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
6 answers
For a microfluidic device of mine, cells are sticking to a PDMS surface (not oxidized). Are there any surface treatments that can be used to reduce this effect? It may also be that the surface of the PDMS is not perfectly smooth. In that case how can I ensure the PDMS being spin coated is smoother?
Relevant answer
Answer
Haven't tried myself, but you could try to plasma-coat the PDMS with a teflon-like polymer. This is a second half of the Bosch etching process for passivation: C4F8 gas, flow 50-100 sccm, RF 0-10W, ICP RF ~2000W, pressure some tens of mtorrs, or any conditions that give low bias voltage. A couple of seconds should grow a teflon-like substance on the surface to which nothing really sticks well.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
6 answers
I am looking for the microchannel's most important applications between:
- Micro-electronic Thermal Management
- Solar Collectors
- Space Machines Cooling
- Drilling Devices
and etc ...
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Karam Mohammed
your comment is useful, thanks.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
4 answers
Hello,
For a microfluidic device I have built, I have a layer of PDMS acting as a gasket. I would like to be able to sterilized this device such that it can be reused. I am aware of multiple sterilization techniques (UV light, NaOH, bleach etc.) but ideally I would like to be able to put my devices in an autoclave.
My first question is, can PDMS be autoclaved? The layer I have now is approx. 20 um thick, spin coated on borosilicate glass. My lab members think not, but Millet et al. seems to suggest it is possible.
My follow-up question would be if the PDMS cannot be autoclaved, is there a material which could substitute as a gasket that CAN withstand being autoclaved? Ideally I could also create a layer of this material approx. 20 um thick on my device.
Any suggestions would be appreciated!
Relevant answer
Answer
So I tried putting the devices in the autoclave and nothing bad seemed to happen! There was a residue on the PDMS, looked like it was from an evaporated liquid, but it rinsed off with ethanol. Under the microscope there was no difference before/after. Just have to try running cells and see if there is any effect I haven't seen yet!
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
I had used a closed micro-channel (0.5 mm height, 5 mm wide) for an immunological reaction. I wish to re-use the same for some minor experiments, and need to remove a small layer of the acrylic surface (say 1 micron or less), such that the surface is as good as new. How can this be done?
Getting new channels for such indicative experiments is not economical and rather time consuming, and this is why we wish to reuse the channels.
Relevant answer
Answer
In addition to the mentioned chemical cleaning method , you could also ultrasonicate the device filled with the cleaning solution or a mild detergent solution.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
4 answers
Has anyone published their work in Microsystems and Nanoengineering journal which is published by Nature? Is it comparable with Lab-on-a-chip journal by RSC?
Relevant answer
Answer
I have not published my own work, but my former research group did publish in nature nanotechnology. And from my view I would say that Lab-on-a-chip is often more applied so you would build more how the technology works where as in the nature is was more focused on the finding, so what is the fundamental new item.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
1 answer
Dear Experts,
I have struggled with bonding issue for quite sometime. Initially, I plasma bonded (Oxygen and Nitrogen) the PDMS on LiNbO3. The bonding worked for the 1st time, but after a while there was a leakage, so I removed the PDMS and replace with the new PDMS microchannel.
However, the 2nd, 3rd.. time bonding of PDMS on LiNbO3 is very weak and causes internal leakages. Even I wiped/rubbed LiNbO3 with acetone every time before bonding.
Anyone has suggestion on this bonding issue ?
- is it due to a change of LiNbO3 surface composition, with oxygen ?
- any suggestion ?
Best Regards,
Yannapol Sriphutkiat
Relevant answer
Answer
The process we use is to clean the LN chip with Acetone, then Iso-propanol (IPA) and then Ethanol, (you may wash it with RO water as well at the end); dry it with delicate task wipers or dry air/N2.
To recover LN after a failed bonding, LN+PDMS chip could be left in Ethanol for hours then, PDMS chip will be easily removed. PDMS gets swollen by ethanol. Ethanol can dissolve PDMS but in a very small amount and very slow rate. PDMS residues can be wiped with a ethanol-wet wipe as well. cleaning of the LN chip after a failed bonding all depends to the initial bonding and mix of PDMS. For very thin PDMS films if spin coated, it's harder to get rid of PDMS.
For a good bonding, silicon dioxide can be deposited on the bonding area. this way, initial bonding works much better than the bare LN chip.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
5 answers
I recently experienced the shrinking of PDMS. I mean the structures don't have the same size once removed from the SU8 mold. I need to align and bond it on a set of electrodes and because of the shrinking they do not fit together. Something like 10 or 20µm over 4mm.
Is there a way to avoid PDMS shrinking? Lower temperature reticulation? Any ideas?
Relevant answer
Answer
Pour PDMS on your mold and put a transparent film on it. After baking, peel off the PDMS from the mold without removing the film. Do the plasma treatment, align and bond your PDMS while it is adhered to the film. After bonding, can peel off the film. The film acts as an anchor which prevents the PDMS from shrinking.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
6 answers
We need a new device to do cell research. CellASIC of Merck Millipore is a choice, but we need comparisons among different instruments.
Relevant answer
Answer
It is an old question but please check www.nehirbt.com.tr if you need custom designs of PDMS microfluidics chips.
Best wishes
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
I am using syringe pump with the flowrate set to 5ul/min. When I flow water which is in plastic syringe through a 1mm 0.5mm tube and collect the liquid for 10min. Then I see that ~50ul liquid is collected. But if I flow water using the same setting through a 6um glass capillary the liquid collected is only ~44ul. This can happen only if the flowrate is reduced incase of micro capillary. But why does this happen? Is there any theory to calculate the loss?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you, Martina
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
Hello, 
in my current project, I have to create tiny microstructures in PDMS. The mold is a photoresist containing holes with a diameter of 5-10 micrometer and a depth of around 150 micrometer. 
The most common way in microfluidics is to degas the PDMS polymer properly and to pour it directly on the mold. After that, most of the people degas the casted polymer or bake it. 
In my case, I am concerned that the air which is trapped during the casting process is not released due to the very tiny holes. Has anyone experienced that even in very small structures air bubbles will be soaked out? Which pressure level would you recommend? 
I have thought to pour the PDMS on the wafer in vacuum with a small setup inside a desiccator. Has anyone ever tried this? 
Kind regards, 
Karl Tschurtschenthaler 
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Karl,
I have tried the mechanical setup inside the desiccator. It works but I have not tried such narrow and deep holes. In my case the holes diameters ranged from 5um to 50um, but the aspect ratios were only 3 to 4. So I could get away with the standard method of pouring degassed pdms and then degassing again.
- Siddharth
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
Hello, I am working on protein detection sensor, and in one step, I need to incubate protein targets with the antibodies on the electrodes. However, antibodies are only functionalized on certain places of the electrodes with a width of 5 um, and length of 550 um, and it will be great if all proteins within the sample are within this area rather than the entire electrodes. So is there a way to do that? I am thinking of making a microchannel, but 5 um wide microchannel seems to be difficult to make (maybe cut it with FIB on PDMS?). Is there a easy way to make this microchannel? Many thanks!
Relevant answer
Answer
Can be done. You can do it with any good laser engraver. See attached publications.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
6 answers
Hello everyone,
I am experiencing a problem with double layer microfluidic fabrication. I am going to eventually use this device on human cells, thus the environment needs to be appropriate. I have been seeing some particles due to punching the inlet/outlet holes of the device. Has anyone had this experience before? I am new to two layer device fabrication, thus any tips on cleaning the holes after punching/the actual punching method, etc., would be appreciated.
Any tips on multilayer soft lithography protocol would be great as well. If there are researchers who can share their protocols, tips and tricks?
thank you and have a great experiment everyone!
Relevant answer
Answer
different diameter punchers are available for punching PDMS layer. you can check the following link >  https://www.tedpella.com/histo_html/harris-punches.htm  for such puncher. We are using it for last few years, it works perfectly. 
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
4 answers
I work in integrated microfluidics system and I like to bond my microfluidic chip to Epoxy substrate. Could anyone suggest me what are the possible ways to bond PDMS to Epoxy??
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi,
Epoxies in general are hydrophilic (contain OH-groups) while PDMS has lots of methyl groups and by nature is hydrophobic. This means these molecules don't like each other. You can try making PDMS hydrophilic by plasma or ozon treatment or by using a primer on top of epoxy (primers need OH-groups) which makes it hydrophobic on the outside. A strong bond you will probably never get, PDMS has the nasty property to rearrange its molecular bonds so after a while a epoxy-PDMS bond will deteriorate.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
Hello everyone,
For those familiar with using PDMS microfluidic devices for biological experiments, to what extent is PDMS gas-permeable? I have seen this mentioned in a few review papers but never qualified. I have not read many material science papers on PDMS so this may be why. Is that to say that cell culture medium flowing through an enclosed PDMS microfluidic devices will be able to equilibrate to a neutral pH in an incubate? If this is the case, how thick can PDMS walls be before this is no longer viable?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Sebastian,
   I’d assume that you’re interested in the permeability of PDMS to carbon dioxide and oxygen? From work that I had done during my doctoral candidacy, I’d learnt that PDMS is preferentially permeable to oxygen, although this is not very significant, certainly not enough to sustain a monolayer of cells in culture. You’d have to consider two things - (i) the thickness of the ceiling and the floor of the microchannel, which dictates the permeability of the layers to oxygen; (ii) the oxygen consumption rate of the cells, which dictates how permeable the PDMS layers have to be. 
   I can’t recall the actual numbers now, but just to give you an idea: a monolayer of mouse pancreatic beta cells in a microchannel of cross section approximately 50 um by 50 um needs the PDMS ceiling and floor to be about 0.5 mm thick. This barely supplies the appropriate amount of oxygen in a static culture. 
   You can augment this strategy by hyper-oxygenating your cell-loaded growth media when seeding the microchannel. However, even this provides only a temporary supply. A more viable approach would be to have a constant perfusion of growth medium over the cells. This would ensure adequate oxygenation, pH maintenance and waste clearance. However, it exposes your cells to shear stresses which may compromise their viability. I'm sorry for the vagueness, I did this work about a decade ago.
  Feel free to email me at darren.tan@boku.ac.at if you’d like to discuss more. I’ll try to find any reported material we had if you like.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
7 answers
Something like: this is the 2D CAD structure, material, this is input this output, medium=blood, pressure here, pressure there ...
and then show flow directions, velocity etc.
Maybe in AutoDesk Simulation CFD.
Never did such a simulation before.
Relevant answer
Answer
At low Reynolds (small capillaries) you shall take care to the non-newtonian properties of the blood: select the right option in Comsol or use analytical formulae if you geometry is simple (see rheology textbook)
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
1 answer
I have electrode arrays and I would like to measure multichannel with SI 1260. Are you working with this machine? If you know, please help me.
Relevant answer
Answer
also for various techniques you can refer the book matrix preconditioning .... ..... by K E Chen, cambridge university press 
best
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
4 answers
Hello, 
I am wondering which FOXA1 antibody do you guys use to conduct your ChIP experiments? I've been using 17-10267 from Millipore. 
I am planning to ChIP low cell numbers (i.e <50 000 cells) and frozen tissue. The lower cell number I go with the EMD Millipore antibody, less enrichment I'm getting.
Raised in goat or rabbit would be preferred
Thanks in advance!
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Stanley.
hope you will share your experience with these antibodies on www.pAbmAbs.com. Here, scientists can share information about antibodies they use in their research and your experience with these antibodies is very important as you can save time and money for other scientists looking for suitable antibodies against FOXA1. Currently, more than 1000 different antibodies have been reviewed by scientists all over the world, and i hope you will contribute as well. Thank you :)
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
8 answers
I would like to test the response of cancer cells (MDA and MCF7) on Cisplatin. I bought a bottle (15g) in powder.
Could you tell me how should I dilute it? Which concentration should I use? How long should I monitor?
Relevant answer
Answer
I diluted Cisplatin in DMSO but DMSO deactivate the toxic effect of Cisplatin. Is anyone know any other solvent good for Cisplatin.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
16 answers
I am using SU-8 2015 for my microfluidic channel structures. The substrate is 1mm thick glass wafer. 
Issue : SU-8 flows off the substrate during the developing process. The adhesion is poor apparently.
Solution/s to this problem are needed.
The protocol I am following is as follows.
1) Cleaning and dehydration bake of the wafer.
2) Spin coating of SU8 of desired thickness.
3) Soft baking process. 2 mins at 65C and 5 mins at 95C.
4) Exposure using MA-6 Mask Aligner.
5) Post Exposure baking. 2 min at 65C and 5-10 min at 95C.
6) Developing in solution for 1min.
7) Rinsing with IPA and drying with Nitrogen gas.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Ahmad,
As Daniel pointed out, there are several adhesion promoters available to purchase (such as 'TI PRIME', 'HMDS' and 'OmniCoat').
Your dehydration bake - what temperature and duration are you using? I usually use 200oC on a hot plate for 15 minutes or longer.
You could also try a surface activation step such as Piranha (H2SO4 & H202), UV-ozone or oxygen plasma (if using an adhesion promoter, do this first).
The rest of your process steps look good.
Hope you manage to find a solution.
Jules
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
4 answers
Hello,
I am working on colorimetric analysis of Lab-on-a-chip to determined the blood hematocrit. Usually, I prepare hematocrit samples of 10%-65% with 5% incrementation. Then in the colorimetric analysis, we have gray scale value (GSV) of different concentration. Relative GSV value is in principle linearly increases with hematocrit concentration. Could you please explain how to calculate LOD, sensitivity and resolution of the LOC device?
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Jalal,
There are several standard for LOD, sensitivity, and resolution. In my biosensor research, I use IUPAC definition of these parameters. http://goldbook.iupac.org/L03540.html
If you have series data with good linearity, that's good. Herewith my group method to calculate it:
1. Your linearity line has the slope. For instance, the trend is increased as the concentration increasing. The slope of your trendline represents your "Sensitivity". The unit can be [unit signal/unit concentration]. It means by adding certain concentration your system enhance the signal in the certain level. The higher sensitivity value, the better performance of your system.
2. Before you measure the series concentration, you need to measure the "blank or zero concentration" for your reference signal. For example, you measure 0% sample 3 times. The average signal will be your reference level. While the standard deviation (SD/noise) will be the important part to measure resolution. The resolution can be measured by:
Res = SD / Sensitivity.
The resolution unit will be [concentration unit].
In simple words, Resolution can be explained as the smallest concentration of your system that gives the signal with confidence factor 1. smaller your resolution, your system has better performance. 
3. LOD, in my group, use confidence factor 3.
So it can be calculated.
LOD = 3*SD / Sensitivity.
In simple word, LOD is the concentration you need to enhance your system resulting signal level around 3 times of your standard deviation (noise).
Good luck with your research.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
1 answer
Hello,
I am working on colorimetric analysis of blood hematocrit using microfluidic chip. I have measured the relative gray scale value (GSV) of hematocrit of 10% to 65% with 5% incrementation. Observed GSV with different hematocrit levels is linear with correlation coefficient of R2=0.9854. Now I am asking about some specific method to calculate the resolution of the microfluidic chip. Pls be reminded that I have GSV data for blood hematocrit of 15% to 65% range.
Relevant answer
Typically you should rely on a more standardized technique..use a sample where you know by sure a value and then compare it to your proposed device or methodology. About resolution....you would need a set of samples (with different known values). Resolution will be determined by the smallest change detectable to your device.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
The optical response in electrochromism is defined as the time that required to obtain 90 % of the needed coloration. Can I use some kind of analogy? Any experiences? 
Relevant answer
Answer
The response time as the delay time between the rise of the increase analyte concentration and the rise variation of the current signal taken at 90% of the total variation.  For a chronoamperometry can obtain electrochemical sensor response time from chronoamperogram.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
7 answers
Hello,
I am doing a Passive Particle Separation application in PDMS microchannels. Due to the nature of the process, I am using quite high volumetric flow rates (up to 2.5 ml/min in a 40µm x 500µm microchannel.) The main problem that I have at high flow rates is the leaking of the fluid between inlet fittings and PDMS (i.e., There is no problem about the plasma bonding which I used to bond PDMS and glass base.)
Firstly, I though that the metal fittings that I have used (which can be seen at the image below) are so thin which makes the flow even faster at the inlet of the microchannel and it leads to leaking. For this reason, I decided to use wider plastic fittings to connect my microchannel to the syringe pump that I have been using. However, at this time, PDMS has teared when I was punching it with a wider puncher compatible to the wider plastic inlets. Later on, I decided to place the plastic fittings on the photoresist mold and then cast PDMS to eliminate punching process. At the end, I obtained a PDMS channel integrated to plastic inlets; however there was again leaking between plastic fittings and PDMS.
In all these cases, I used silicon grease around the inlets to isolate little cracking around the inlets through which leaking occurs, but I did not work neither.
Are there anyone who have also experienced this kind of leaking problem, and found a possible solution? I am eager to listen their recomendations.
Thank you in advance,
Utku. 
Relevant answer
Answer
I got this problem before so I can suggest two solutions :
1) the easier one (but sometime doesn't work) is to introduce the microfluidic tubing directly in the inlet without metal or anther plastic fitting : punch the PDMS in the same diameter of the tubing or lightly smaller, then you can introduce the tubing by putting a droplet of isopropanol on the inlet. I noticed on the photo that you use tygon tubings, Teflon tubing are better for this way of connecting.
2) to fabricate a mechanical support with tow parts; your microfluidic system will be between these parts (like a sandwich). Drill the upper part to introduce and to fix the tubing (with glue), use gasket seal around the inlets (between the PDMS and the upper part), choose gasket seal larger than the inlet diameter to make a kind of a reservoir.
Screw down the upper part in the second part to apply a pressure on the microfluidic system. You can use a transparent material;
if the description is not so clear, I can sent you some pictures next week
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
9 answers
HI, I am trying to perform ChIP on low cell numbers (1x106, 200.000) and after sonication and reverse crosslinking to check the chromatin, I see a very sharp band around 1000 bp but nearly no visible smear. Did anybody ever experience the same problem?
Relevant answer
Answer
When optimizing DNA sharing for ChIP, I always perform one sample without fixation/crosslinking, at least in this way you now if the problem is your fixation or sonication conditions
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
8 answers
My problem is clear as it can be seen above. Is it possible produce box-shaped hollow part with SU8 ? 
Relevant answer
Answer
Can also use SU-8 to pattern box, per usual lithographic methods, and then use a dry film SU-8 (MicroChem SU-8-3000 DFR) as lid material. 
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
4 answers
DMEM - dulbecco's modified eagle's medium, consisting of the typical Amino Acids, Glucose, pH indicator, Salts and Vitamins
We want to find a technique for determining of glucose concentrations in this culture from impedance spectroscopy data
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Mikhail
We measuared biological object (fruits) during their putrefaction process on three frequencies 20, 100 and 500 kHz . Typical patert what we have achive after interpolation provided in: 
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
6 answers
Can it be that the most authors and researchers have neglected and still do not follow the demands of the following ISO norms (with year of coming into effect): 15193 (2002); 15194 (2002); 15195 (2003); 17511 (2003); 18153 (2003) and especially: ISO/PDTS 25680.8: Use of external quality assessment schemes in the assessment of the performance of in vitro diagnostic examination procedures? This European Standard was approved by CEN on 2 March 2004 as EN 14136. Why do most published papers in this area not perform the minimum performance test by taking part in an inter-laboratory trial with real samples and not with pure aqueous solutions without a possibly interfering matrix (e.g., in bio-sensing: enzyme-poisoning, denaturing reagents, proteases, drug-metabolites, etc.)?
Relevant answer
Answer
While I agree that papers providing only a matrix-free calibration plot are virtually useless as far as real-world sensing is concerned and should not be published, I believe that many researchers are not interested in commercializing their devices, but are more interested in advancing the state of the art by developing novel approaches to solving problems.  In these cases, the technology is then available for those in the sensor industry to develop into marketable devices.  Not everyone is an entrepreneur who is interested in commercialization, but this should not preclude them from doing good analytical research.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
9 answers
The antibody was already conjugated with quantum dots and the unconjugated proteins was already removed by centrifugal concentrator. While checking via ELISA reader the unconjugated protein was found to be more than the total volume added for the reaction. Please suggest any other method to check the concentration of antibody conjugated Qds.
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear Ganesh,
I would suggest you the following methods rather than ELISA:
1) ultra-centrifugation or nanosep filtration and then take UV/Vis spectroscopy to measure the abs intensity of antibody (~245nm) at the supernatant
2) Gel electrophoresis(native)
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
13 answers
I fabricate PDMS micropillars with LIGA-made casting mold (Nickel Metal Sheet) consisting sinking holes of 240µm depth and around 18µm diameter. My casting setup is as the figure attached. A cannula with a diameter 5mm is clipped tightly together with the casting sheet with one or two clips. Sylgard 182 Silicone for casting the pillars is moved into the cannula by a pipette. Then after the degassing process and the baking process the silicone becomes cured.
My question is concerning the peel-off process. Currently I first remove the clips and then put the whole thing into a vibrating bath (the bath is filled with isopropanol) and wait for the cannula with pillars and the casting sheet to become apart. The pillars are expected to be 240µm high (same as the hole depth). However, most pillars I get suffer from not enough height, that is they are torn apart after the silicone get cured. 
May I ask if anyone has similar experiences and do you have any suggestions concerning the peeling off process? Or maybe anyone has some other ways for peeling them off?
Thanks very much!
Relevant answer
Answer
There could be two reason for the problem
First, it could be that you need to vacuum longer to ensure the uncured PDMS reaches the bottom of the pillar mold, i.e. to make no bubble is trapped. 
Second, for the release, you could consider using a surface treatment of the old with a fluorinated silane to ease the release. 
Finally, you could play with the stiffness of the PDMS by varying the amount of curing agent. 
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
1 answer
Typically the ACF needs a curing process under 150-200 centidegree. Now we want to do the bonding at room temperature so we can not use conventional ACF. Is is feasible to mix the metal particles of ACF with UV curable epoxy for a bonding process?
Relevant answer
Answer
I don't think that this is the best approach. The metal particles will cause shadowing which will reduce the polymerization during the UV exposure. Also you want to have a small gap between the chip and the substrate for a good el. conductivity, so the shadowing there is a second problem. For this case you would need a two step curing UV epoxy.
Maybe you could use epoxies with a long enougth pot life that cure at low temperatures?
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
I am reviewing existing literature that deals with magnetophoresis separation in microfluidic systems and in which the passive magnetic elements (like Ni or permalloy) are integrated with the system as flow-invasive and not side-wall embedded. I appreciate your help in doing this literature survey.
Relevant answer
Answer
Maybe not tottaly related but interesting for your:
Lab Chip, 2014, 14, 1966–1986
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
12 answers
Oxygen/air plasma cleaning or RF etch is widely used to make PDMS blocks stickable on to glass. Is there any other way to achieve the same?
Relevant answer
Answer
You can use simple thermal bonding method to seal PDMS to glass. Make sure both surfaces are flat and clean. Just put these two pieces together with gentle pressure, then bake in oven at 80 oC for over 1 hour.
We use this method to bond microfluidics devices, which can hold pressure at least to 10 Psi.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
I have three electrodes: WE, CE and RE. How can I connect with SI 1260 to measure V1/V2?
Relevant answer
Answer
You need to have a voltage divided by current for impedance. All top 4 electrodes are necessary for impedance measurements.  2 terminal Gen and V1 Hi on one side, I out and V1 Lo on the other. 1260 is not a potentiostat and has no ability to do measurements vs. open circuit because it has no DC measurement capability. Get a 1287 to pair up with it if that is what you hope to do or if you are working in electrochemistry.  If you are dealing with solid state 2 or 4 terminal measurements doing vs ground or vs a bias it is fine to use 1260 stand-alone Feel free to contact me for answers to your Solartron questions as it is my job.  Jim.Mason@ametek.com
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
I want to modified my screen printed electrode (SPCE) with OH group. Later, OH modified SPCE will be treated with APTES to introduce NH2 group on SPCE. Can anyone let me know a simple method to produce OH group on SPCE?
Relevant answer
Answer
You can use DC amperometry by applying a constant voltage for a specific period of time.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
I need to study the flow behavior of emulsion (oil-in-water/water-in-oil) through a microchannel (hydrophilic/hydrophodic). Can you please help me regarding this?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you sir for your kindness.
Sir, for my study purpose I want to refer few research papers relating flow behavior of emulsions through microchannel. I would be happy if I get some research papers relating this topic. My email Id is swati.ralekar@gmail.com
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
15 answers
Especially when your patterns are small like individual pillars. They just get washed off when developing.
Relevant answer
Answer
I'd like to add my two cents to the discussion. In my experience using AZ resist (5214 or 9260), I only experience adhesion problems when the feature size is small, e.g. single pillars with diameter of less than 3 microns. In such a case, the procedure I always use is th efollowing:
- de-hydration of the wafer, 10 min at 200 °C on a hot plate
- spin coat HMDS
- immediately spin coat the AZ resist
As pointed out, softbake conditions (temperature and time) are also important. Usually the optimization of the whole recipe depends on the size and geometry of features to be produced. I found some good advice reading the troubleshooter provided by the Microchemicals company on their website.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
11 answers
I made a die from polycarbonate. Now I want to cast a low viscosity polymer into small channels on the polycarbonate die. These channels are 0.4 mm in width, so when I pour the polymer on the first die, I need time to take bubbles out of it. I think around 10 minute is enough.
I already tried PMMA, but it sticks to polycarbonate. Also I used polyvinyl siloxane but it it's working time is a few minutes.
What do you suggest?
Relevant answer
Answer
If you have a photosensitive PMMA which is also biocompatible and suitable for you experiments, then you can fabricate the microstructure layer in a direct lithography process. Please have a look on one of my uploaded papers published in JMM on characterization of a new elastomeric material. I believe you will find this paper helpful. If you can send me the specification and the grade of the PMMA, then, I may be able to give you a better suggesion.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
7 answers
Extracting membrane and cytoplasmic properties from electrorotation experiments.
Relevant answer
Answer
There are many articles which present the theory in accessible terms. For example:
Is your question a general one or do you have specific issues?
Nicolas
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
I am interested in modeling and simulation.
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you so much
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
How we can modify gold electrode with graphene? What are advantages in using graphene based electrode for cell-based sensor?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dear N. Kheirabadi
Could you tell me more about graphene based sensor advantages? If possible, could you send me by email: anh.nguyen@imtek.de
Thank you so much
Anh
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
10 answers
Has anybody tried to make PDMS electrically conductive? Which material (metal) and methods have you tried?
Relevant answer
Answer
In short you have to add metal nanospheres in the bulk of PDMS. Usually gold, silver and platinum are used for these types of efforts.
The quantity of nanospheres you need to put can be calculated by what is known as "percolation theory". You should read about it and understand how the spheres can create the pathway to allow conductivity in PDMS (or any other polymer).
Have in mind that such efforts (adding metal spheres) can change several properties of the material itself, since after adding metalic spheres inside PDMS you have a composite material and not a polymer any more.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
439 answers
Could anyone comment which are the best graphic designing programs (2D and 3D) used by high impact journals to make colorful scientific illustrations/figures for research articles?
Relevant answer
Answer
I recommend having the graphics done by a professional graphic designer instead of buying software.
Most professionals work with the Adobe Suite, Illustrator is used for 2D-illustrations. For 3D-images Maxon Cinema 4D, Maya or 3DSMax are most popular. But again, the best tools won’t automatically produce high-end graphics.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
We are looking for any experience in the field of storage protein detection in wheat using new devices/techniques instead of SDS-PAGE.
Relevant answer
Answer
SDS-PAGE is running as service with proteins that are purified relatively roughly. Will the switch to Lab-on-chip-devices be esay ?
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
10 answers
What are the parameters to be measured (in lab or on site) in order to assess if the water is fit for drinking in the Indian sub-continent?
Relevant answer
Answer
Dr. VK Saxena has mentioned all the necessary parameters that must be included in the water quality assessment.
I am attaching a draft of IS 10500 and additionally the Indian standard for irrigation water quality.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
I have SU8 structure on top of Au electrode? If I put the chip in the oven, at which maximum temperature can I set up which SU8 structure will not damage?
Relevant answer
Answer
Is your gold on an Si wafer? I would not heat the SU-8 to 200, it will likely delaminate. Why exactly do you need to heat the SU-8?
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
8 answers
I would like to modify our gold electrode by GO or r-GO. Does anyone have any experience?
Relevant answer
Answer
I vote for Idea #3 of Sai Siddhardha. It is very nice idea and the best in the lsit ! I would note however that if you have to conduct a transport experiment in this device, the Mercaptoarenes will build an additional barrier for injected charges above 100K, which have to be accounted. Still the chemical bonds are much better than any physi-sorption. You will just have to play a little bit with this technique. I will glad to send you (if you need) refs on accounting aforementioned molecular barrier
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
Could you tell me about the process to clean gold electrode before doing experiment with cells? Our system consists of thin film gold (100nm) electrode inside microchannel by SU-8.
Thank you so much
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Ahn,
The details of the process can be found here: http://www.inrf.uci.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/sop-wet-silicon-rca-1.pdf. There is another, more rigorous cleaning procedure called Piranha, but this involves more dangerous chemicals. I would try the RCA-1 first and see if you get better results.
In my experiments using similar electrodes with cells, we also typically incubate devices with a 2% solution of BSA for 15 minutes to minimize non-specific binding of the cells in the device.
Mindy
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
10 answers
The fluid in my case is blood with suspended elements like RBCs etc. i.e. a non-Newtonian fluid.
Relevant answer
Answer
The RBC's in your channel will deform depending on the shear forces. This deformation can be visualized by the diffraction patter of laser light shining through. Diffraction is larger in the direction of the smaller sizes. This can easily be observes with a relatively simple camera.
Next to your cells under investigation you could add an additional small population with known elongation for calibration. I would be interested in your results.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
I would like to record the SEM image of a cell on top of a Gold electrode? How should I prepare the sample? If you have experience, please let me know. Thank you so much
Relevant answer
Answer
I use the above mentioned protocol with the exception of gold (we use platinum 30micron coating).
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
I am looking to aquire a reliable, yet affordable, visulization system to track and record the motion of poly-sized magnetic beads flowing through a magneteophoresis microfluidic separation device. The smallest bead can have a diameter less than 0.5 microns. The beads are expected to have distinct separation and deflections (based on their magnetic dealings) into different sub-microchannels. The more resolved tracking and the more the systems that are integrated are preferred.
Relevant answer
Answer
Optical coherence tomography can do this. There are systems available on the market that will give you video rate recording with depth (Z) resolution and in some cases Doppler information (if you do the necessary processing to extract it from the data). You might be able to profile the flows in your device channels. It will also "see" through mildly scattering fluids.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
7 answers
I measured impedance between 2 planar gold electrodes inside a microchannel filled with medium for cell culture. Which electrical elements should I put in the circuit and how are they connected together? Should I use Randles circuit for this system?
Relevant answer
Answer
For circuit models of the electrodes, you might want to look at the following papers by Yuri Feldman et al.: "Fractal-polarization correction in time domain dielectric spectroscopy" (Physical Review E, 1998) and "Electrode polarization correction in time domain dielectric spectroscopy" (Measurement Science and Technology, 2001).
If you have a dilute suspension of cells/particles in between the electrodes, Maxwell's Mixture Equation is the way to go and the paper Heidi mentioned is an excellent reference. If you have a dense suspension there's some other equations that are reviewed in Koji Asami's 2002 article in Progress in Polymer Science: "Characterization of heterogeneous systems by dielectric spectroscopy".
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
I would like to modify our Gold electrode by Fibronectin or Poly-L_Lysin to reduce the time for cell attach on surface of electrode. If you have experiences, please help me.
Relevant answer
Answer
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
I would like to use Matrigel for cell culture but I don't know which concentration of Matrigel to use. Can anyone give some advice?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thank you so much Peggy
Best regards
Anh
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
8 answers
I would like to use protein for reducing the time for breast cancer cell attach on the gold electrode.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hi Anh!
Actually I did not use poly-L-Lysine for cells (only for enzymes and this work is still under way), but I know from the literature it is the most often used methodology for proteins and cells. In your case it will depend on the cell surface charge - if negative compounds dominating - this methodology is very sufficient. When positive - you should look for another than poly-L-Lysine molecule. Anyway, just try. Another suggestion could be:
1. Cover your gold electrode with poly-L-Lysine (concentration 0.5% normally) during 3 hours.
2. Deposit your breast cancer cells on the electrode and dry it for 10-15 min (of course if you are sure it will not damage cells).
3. Cover your bi-layer sandwich with 0.5-1.0 % NAFION (negatively charged).
Kind regards.
Yaroslav.
P.S. I was in Vietnam just once, in 2009 and spent there ten absolutely amazing days - some of my friends said that I tried during this period a lot of foods they never eaten before - field mice, for example. There is also one fruit (I do not remember name) – majority of Vietnamese hate due to its smell, but the taste is unforgettable.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
17 answers
After finish fabricating, I coated a thin layer of AZ1518 to protect the gold electrode for dicing. Before bonding, chips were already cleaned with Axetol in ultrasonic for 3 min, isopropanol for 3 min and water. But the surface of the electrodes don't seem to be clean. I would like to use Piranha to clean and remove photoresist. Could you share your experience with me.
Relevant answer
Answer
Never use Piranha solution on substrate that has metal e.g., Ni, Au, Cu etc. There will always be damage to metal. Use of Acetone is a standard procedure to remove the photoresist and I was doing it routinely when doing Photolithography. Alternately you can use Plasma treatment. But using acetone should take only minutes to remove the photoresist.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
1 answer
Is there any LOC-SERS application?
Relevant answer
Answer
Noble metal nanoparticles obtained from chemical reduction, Ag island films, roughned electrodes, or some specific functionalized nanoparticles, depending on what you need to detect
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
The bottom of 96 well plate will be coverslip glass. Inherent spin coating is not possible since I require varying ratios in one 96 well. Upon polymerization the coated/deposited 96 well will be subjected to 02 plasma/chemical activation for studying adherence of protein in high content microscope with 63 x objective.
Relevant answer
Answer
Unfortunately achieving absolutely uniform 50 um coating within each well would be quite tricky. Mostly because of meniscus effects, where PDMS in the center of the well will be thinner than near the walls (similar to what you might see when collagen solidifies within the wells). If you can live with meniscus and look only at the center, then gravimetric approach would be the easiest (simply compute the mass of the PDMS volume that on average would give you 50 um in the well).
A more complicated approach would be to start with the bottomless well-plate. Spin-coat your 100:1 PDMS ratio onto a glass-slide. Then place your bottomless well-plate on top (might need to use a clamping arrangement) and them add required volume of the curing agent to other wells with the precision pipetters. You'll have to figure out the appropriate increments and curing protocols (maybe do it at RT for 24 h and then 2 h in 65C oven)
Another way is to spin each ratio separately, then cure, punch out the disks, place them onto the glass slide, and then place bottomless well plate on top. Now, the practical limit of what you can handle with tweezers is between 15:1 and 20:1 ratios. Anything beyond that is way too gooey.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
25 answers
The recipe I followed: place wafer on Hotplate in 15min at 150 degree - Spin coating - softbake at 95 degree in 15min - Exposure - Hardbake: 65 deg in 1min and 95 deg in 5 min - Develope in 8 min.
Relevant answer
Answer
Hello Ngyuen Do look up the microchem data sheet as suggested by Rodrigo. From my experience with SU8, it is absolutely critical to have a completely dehyrdated Si wafer. I dehydrate my wafers overnight at 180 deg C and then spin coat the wafers with SU8 withn 5 minutes of removing it from the hot plate. This always seems to give excellent adhesion even with high aspect ratio or thick resist coatings.
The other suggestion would be to coat the dehydrated wafer with a few micron thick SU8 3005 or SU8 3010. Full expose this layer of SU8 using the contact aligner, hard bake it and then sping furtehr layers of SU8 on top of it.
Also use a prime wafer which will have a uniformly flat surface compared to test wafers..
I hope this solves your problem of adhesion on the wafer.
Cheers Prakash
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
Had an array of silicon nanowires, now I want to deposit a metal particle on the top of it. I do not want to use the VLS method to get this. Anyone have any suggestion?
Relevant answer
Answer
Thanks guys...............
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
2 answers
I am interested in applying COMSOL Multiphysics to simulate microfluidic devices. Can any one recommend me any book/reference to start with?
Relevant answer
Answer
I recomend Model Gallery on COMSOL website. If you have license file, just upload it to your account and you will be able to download PDF with documentaion and MPH files to build such model step-by-step.
  • asked a question related to Lab on a Chip
Question
3 answers
Good idea to move the discussion above and beyond the acknowledge and significant challenges related to device integration.
Relevant answer
Answer
The challenges depend on the application case. In case of serum analysis the red blood cells are normally separated with centrifugation. Thus, such a device has to be used before entering a serum sample in an analytical lab-on-a-chip device. In case the latter should perform a kind of capillary phoresis analysis, many researchers don’t talk how to integrate a high voltage power supply into a hand-held unit. In most cases the calibration is the greatest challenge. In cases of chemical or biochemical analysis it is nearly impossible to get a reliable and long lasting calibration build-in by the producer of the lab-on-a-chip device. Thus stable standardization solutions must be included into the chip. This all will increase the production costs. And in medical applications there are strict regulations how reliable a device must be. Law suits can be very expensive. The analytical results must be comparable to the traditional clinical analysis performed with sophisticated automated instruments. For the general market simple test strip devices (for each analyte a strip and an evaluation instrument on the bench table) are less expensive than a multi-purpose lab-on-a-chip device. If many samples are to be analyzed there is the carry-over problem to be solved with the chip based device. For single use it will be too expensive and stupid to produce so much waste. This are only some reasons why such chip devices have not yet entered the market to a greater extend.