Discover the world's scientific knowledge
With 160+ million publication pages, 25+ million researchers and 1+ million questions, this is where everyone can access science
You can use AND, OR, NOT, "" and () to specify your search.
Question
- Jan 2020
At quantum-mechanics a standard-experiment should be the `EPR-Paradoxon´ — not?
Could there be information about the so called `bundled (verschränkt) particle´?
The standard lowest common version is: `it is not the same, only information´ — not?
Zeilinger does the experiment and offers the results in the book `Einsteins Schleier´.
He had success in every 4th shot, so he represented — common known?
I did a paper against any equalness / information. My interpretation goes on coincidence (1 equalness in property every 4 different possibilities.
This papers (so far in german only) I gave to Zeilinger on his demand. No answer!
Later I read (more or less so) this: there only could be a coincidence 1 of 3 because of the 3-dimensionality of the orientation in space of the phenomenon which is searched on.
That leads to a `1 of 3 or 1 of 4 coincidence´ question! Known or not? Should I expand the question?
…
Question
- Feb 2014
I need the percentage of detached homes out of all homes roughly during 1870-1920. Also, the percentage of private homeownership same historic period. Data for Frankfurt, Berlin, Munich, Cologne, would be especially helpful.
…
Question
- Apr 2024
how should one interpret these conflicting signals? Waiting for acceptance or rejection of a paper can be stressful, especially with such ambiguous indicators.
…
Question
- Jul 2017
I've been searching reports for vanilla prices in the german market range 2001-2016 but haven't found useful info.
Different sources have large differences on pricing for vanilla cured beans for german market, hence there's no accurate trendline on the issue.
…
Question
- Feb 2019
In 1964, the young Walter Kasper (born in 1933) was granted by the Faculty of Catholic Theology at Tübingen the licence to teach dogmatic theology on the basis of a thesis on Philosophie und Theologie der Geschichte in der Spätphilosophie Schellings (Philosophy and Theology of History in Schelling’s Late Philosophy). Kasper’s interest in Schelling, himself a student at the Evangelisches Stift at Tübingen, thus originated in the context of his university studies in the school of J.R. Geiselmann and developed in parallel with his theological education. For this reason, it is impossible to form a correct idea of Kasper and his whole theology unless one is willing to take into account this background, not least because he himself has always consciously and forcefully recognised this fact and seen in it his own centre of gravity. Kasper’s work and thought were shaped in a lasting manner during his university years. In fact, his entire academic oeuvre has been nurtured from this fecund origin so much so that he became one of the most well known names associated with the Catholic school at Tübingen to which he gave a new, creative impulse having himself been profoundly inspired by it. ‘He always emphasised his own roots not only as a teacher of theology and a member of the teaching faculty of this Institution, but also as Bishop’ and cardinal. The principal intention of the present book is precisely this: to return to this beginning and elucidate these decisive years for Kasper in broad outline by way of a Relecture and interpretation of his book on The Absolute in History and the particular manner in which he interpreted the so-called second Schelling, an author whom he approached in the wake of Walter Schulz and at practically the same time as Xavier Tilliette. The analysis will subsequently move on into the more properly theological field.
…
Question
- Jul 2019
Dear all,
I have had a couple of experiences answering R&Rs. In general, it has gone smoothly and the reviews have been always reasonable. They always have helped to improve the first draft definitely. But I recently received an R&R, and I have serious differences with the reviewer. They are not methodological or technical, but interpretative, philosophical and theoretical. What do you recommend? How should I answer those reviews? Until what point should I be condescending?
…
Question
- Feb 2021
The results of Multiple regression will give you Standardized beta and unstandardized beta with standard error, P-value, and C.I, how we can find unadjusted or adjusted Odds ratio from these outputs, which of these SPSS output will denote these, please?
Should we include adjusted or unadjusted OR in the Table we create from SPSS output for publications?
And if yes, how we could find them if it is not available in the SPSS output of Multiple regression analysis.
…
Question
- Sep 2019
I would like to make notice of the misunderstanding or lack of further interest in respect to the SPEC wich stands for Subject Phrase Ergative Case.
During my research of the Basque Ergative Case, I found out in Dixon 1994. The real meaning of SPEC, but to my surprise in the Faculty I was conducting my research, they translated not as it is an acronym, instead of that they translated as if it were a short for a specificier. Specificier can it be understood but as something very generic.The meaning of Subject Phrase Ergative Case, it could be translated like Nominal Predicate Ergative Case, but it would not be correct. It would not be correct because Ergative languages use instead of Nominative Case for the Subject Absolutive Case when the verb has no argument.
To my surprise in the Department of English and German Philology, Traslation and Interpretation of the University of the Basque Country , they had no idea that this was an acronym. It would be a big error if we would keep on translating it like this to other abroad Universities wich have conduct previous research in the same area as I did. I would like to apologize for this such an error to anyone involved in the name of the University of the Basque Country.
…
Question
- Oct 2018
I submitted a manuscript on the lectotypification and epitypification of a name for publication in a journal. I designated an epitype for the name in accordance with Article 9.9. of the ICN (Turlandet al., 2018), to avoid ambiguity in interpreting the lectotype material, which is devoid of flowers and fruits. While designating the epitype, I was very careful to choose a specimen from the same area (from where the species was originally described) and the same representing a typical condition in flowering. Now the reviewer says that he found the type collection “is not similar to the epitype”. In other words, he expressed doubt as to the identity of the epitype belonging to the same species! As already mentioned, being a revisioner, I took utmost care in selecting the epitype and I have no doubt as to the identity.
How can I satisfy the reviewer in this case? Should I delete the epitypification part and resubmit the manuscript?
…
Question
- Apr 2016
Does anyone know where to buy a translated to english copy of Zur Interpretation von Laktatleistungskurven - experimentelle Ergebnisse mit computergestuetzten Nachberechnungen which translates to For the interpretation of lactate power curves - experimental results with computergestuetzten recalculations
…
© 2008-2024 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved.