Vasileios Drogkaris's research while affiliated with Wesleyan University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Chemical structures of (a) the nitrogen‐centered nucleophiles DMAP, MIM, and DBU investigated in this study and (b) undesired nucleophile byproducts 1–3 that can form when thiol‐methyl acrylate reactions are initiated by DMAP, MIM, and DBU, respectively. DABCO has also been investigated, however no nucleophile byproduct containing DABCO could be synthesized.
Partial ¹H NMR spectra showing the conversion of nucleophile byproducts 1, 2, and 3 into desired thiol‐acrylate product 4 in the presence of M3MP‐. Signals corresponding to DMAP in 1 are highlighted in red in (a), proton signals corresponding to MIM are highlighted in green in (b), and those corresponding to DBU are highlighted in purple in (c). Dashed lines indicate shifts of signals upon reaction with M3MP‐.
Structures of rate‐determining step transition state geometries for the reaction of methane thiolate with DMAP nucleophile byproduct 1 (a), MIM nucleophile byproduct 2 (b), and DBU nucleophile byproduct 3 (c) as obtained from computational modeling. Dashed lines indicate bonds being broken/formed, with bond distances provided in angstroms. Transition state Gibbs free energies relative to starting reactants are provided in kcal/mol. While thiolate deprotonation is the major pathway for the three nucleophile byproducts in both solvents investigated, the SN2 pathway provides an alternative, minor pathway for byproducts 1 and 2 in less polar solvents such as CHCl3.
Representation of the two most prominent means of forming catalytic thiolate along both nucleophile (yellow) and base (blue) pathways, each providing entry to the catalytic anionic cycle (green) that leads to thiol‐Michael product formation. The nucleophile initiated pathway also results in the formation of nucleophile byproducts, some of which are persistent while others can be reactive depending on the nucleophile used.
Conditions: i) CH3CN, 80 °C, ii) CH3OH, HBr, reflux, iii) THF, 0 °C, iv) acetone.

+2

Byproducts formed During Thiol‐Acrylate Reactions Promoted by Nucleophilic Aprotic Amines: Persistent or Reactive?
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

November 2020

·

24 Reads

ChemPlusChem

ChemPlusChem

Vasileios Drogkaris

·

Brian H. Northrop

The nucleophile‐initiated mechanism of thiol‐Michael reactions naturally leads to the formation of undesired nucleophile byproducts. Three aza‐Michael compounds representing nucleophile byproducts of thiol‐acrylate reactions initiated by 4‐dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), 1‐methylimidazole (MIM), and 1,8‐diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec‐7‐ene (DBU) have been synthesized and their reactivity in the presence of thiolate has been investigated. Spectroscopic analysis shows that each nucleophile byproduct reacts with thiolate to produce a desired thiol‐acrylate product along with liberated aprotic amines DMAP, MIM, or DBU, thus demonstrating that these byproducts are reactive rather than persistent. Density functional theoretical computations support experimental observations and predict that a β‐elimination mechanism is favored for converting each nucleophile byproduct into a desired thiol‐acrylate product, though an SN2 process can be competitive (i. e. within <2.5 kcal/mol) in less polar solvents.

View access options
Share

Discrete Boronate Ester Ladders from the Dynamic Covalent Self-Assembly of Oligo(phenylene ethynylene) Derivatives and Phenylenebis(boronic acid)

March 2020

·

13 Reads

·

6 Citations

Organic Chemistry Frontiers

Three increasingly π-conjugated covalent organic polygons have been prepared by the dynamic covalent condensation of catechol-based oligo(phenylene ethynylene) derivatives with phenylenebis(boronic acid). The assemblies represent a series of boronate ester “ladders” wherein two electron rich oligo(phenylene ethynylene) “rungs” are bridged by electron deficient aryl boronate ester “rails,” resulting in quasi-two-dimensional oligomers of increasing size. Spectroscopic and computational investigations suggest that the ladders exhibit a greater effective conjugation length than comparable oligo(phenylene ethynylene) compounds not bridged by aryl boronate esters. Different conformations, substitutions, and constitutions of boronate ester ladders are also modeled to gain further insight into their influence on π-conjugation and HOMO-LUMO gaps of isolated one-dimensional versus bridged, quasi-two-dimensional conjugated organic materials.

Citations (1)


... Boronic esters have also been used to form dynamic assemblies such as micelles (Zhao et al., 2014;Zhang et al., 2020a) or cage structures (Takata et al., 2020;Giraldi et al., 2021). Even a dynamically self-assembled nanoscale boronate ester ladder has been reported (Drogkaris and Northrop, 2020). ...

Reference:

Covalent adaptable networks using boronate linkages by incorporating TetraAzaADamantanes
Discrete Boronate Ester Ladders from the Dynamic Covalent Self-Assembly of Oligo(phenylene ethynylene) Derivatives and Phenylenebis(boronic acid)
  • Citing Article
  • March 2020

Organic Chemistry Frontiers