Ulrik Jørgensen's scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (5)


Fig.1: MoorMaster by Cavotec Fig.2: AutoMoor by Trelleborg
Fig.3: StS mooring system by AMS Fig.4: AMS' magnetic mooring system
Automated Mooring Systems
  • Conference Paper
  • Full-text available

May 2023

·

725 Reads

Ulrik Jørgensen

·

·

·

Ul

This paper explores the feasibility of existing automated mooring systems for short-sea container ships and deep-sea bulk ships. The systems in question include vacuum-based, magnetic-based, and robotic arm-based solutions. By evaluating input from users and system suppliers, the study considers the performance of these systems in terms of safety, operation time, efficiency, sustainability, and emissions reduction. The paper also identifies potential challenges associated with the use of automated mooring systems in these contexts. Overall, this study provides valuable insights for stakeholders seeking to enhance the efficiency and safety of mooring operations in the shipping industry.

Download
Share

The importance of documenting autonomous tests

July 2022

·

11 Reads

Journal of Physics Conference Series

·

·

Ulrik Jørgensen

·

[...]

·

Jose Vicente Perello Gisbert

This paper presents how autonomous tests can be documented and why this is important. A test area in Norway, more specifically the Trondheimsfjorden Test Area for Autonomous Ships, is used as a pilot to conduct tests with autonomous vessels and for demonstrating the procedure of documenting results. There are typically three stages in such a documentation process; 1) To register and inform about a planned test on the fjord, 2) To inform about ongoing tests and to document test results by collecting data from the vessel and from the sensor infrastructure, 3) To show historical tests and be able to do analytics or conduct learning from previous tests. The Trondheimsfjorden Test Area has been instrumented with communication and navigation infrastructure, a control centre for control and monitor of the install infrastructure and for remote operation of a ship, and a data centre for planning autonomous tests, storing data, and for sharing of test results. By documenting test results in a standardized format, this can be used to verify new technology and solutions, share knowledge and experiences, and for documentation procedures and guidelines used for the purpose. A demonstration held in The Trondheimsfjorden Test Area showed the importance of streamlining the process of conducting autonomous test and documenting them in a standardized format. This work is based on the results from the research project NAVISP-EL3-005 “Trondheimsfjorden Test Area for Autonomous Ships”. The Navigation Innovation and Support Programme (NAVISP) is the programme of the European Space Agency to support the competitiveness of the European industry in the wide field of positioning, navigation and timing while supporting member states in enhancing national objectives and capabilities in the sector.


Ship route optimization using hybrid physics-guided machine learning

July 2022

·

61 Reads

·

1 Citation

Journal of Physics Conference Series

This paper presents a method for energy efficient weather routing of a ferry in Norway. Historical operational data from the ferry and environmental data are used to develop two models that predict the energy consumption. The first is a purely data-driven linear regression energy model, while the second is as a hybrid model, combining physical models with data-driven models using machine learning techniques. With an established energy model, it is possible to develop a route optimization that proposes efficient routes with less energy usage compared to fixed speed and heading control.


Evaluation of Ship Energy Models and Route Optimization

A weather routing system for a ferry in Norway has been developed. In this paper three different models for estimating the energy consumption have been evaluated. The three energy models include two data-driven models, i.e., a linear regression model and a hybrid model, and a simulation-based energy model. The hybrid energy model performed best with the highest accuracy and at the lowest run time. Moreover, using the hybrid energy model, the weather routing system has been tested and evaluated. The results show typical energy savings up to 1,5% are achieved.


Fig 1: Illustration of splitting of an individual trip into acceleration, transit, and retardation phase. The top panel shows the position of the vessel during the trip. The departure point is in the lower left corner. The bottom panel shows the vessel speed (solid line) and power output of the vessels propulsion system (dashed). Both graphs are normalised by the average values of the respective variables. The black dashed lines (bottom panel) and circles (top panel) indicate the time and position of the start of different phases, respectively.
Fig. 2: Distribution of share of propulsion energy used for a whole trip per phase. The distributions are represented using so-called boxplots. The box represents the interquartile range of the distribution (i.e. the central 75% of the data points), the red line the median. Datapoints further then 1.5 time the interquartile range away from the median (indicated by lines extending from the box, called whiskers) are considered outliers and indicated by a marker (x). The figure shows that for the collected data, the acceleration phase accounts for approximately 12-15% of the overall energy consumption, while the retardation phase represents ca. 7-10%. The transit phase typically amounts to 75-80% of the overall energy consumption during a single trip.
Energy Efficient and Safe Ship Routing using Machine Learning Techniques on Operational and Weather Data

August 2021

·

198 Reads

·

6 Citations

This paper presents a method for energy efficient routing of a symmetrical electrical car ferry in Norway. Historical and operational data from the ferry and environmental data (wind, current, and waves) have been used to develop a machine learning model that predicts the energy consumption. Data from more than 2000 trips have been used for training, validation, and testing of the model. By combining weather forecast and the established energy prediction model it is possible to propose more energy efficient route during the transit phase. Energy saving up to 3% are achieved on a selection of representative routes.

Citations (1)


... Recent research studies [15], [16] have explored energyefficient routing for an electric ferry in Western Norway. They rely on operational data from onboard measurements and environmental conditions from the Norwegian Meteorological Institute, and proposed a hybrid physics-guided machine learning model for optimizing the ship route. ...

Reference:

Time-Series Analysis Approach for Improving Energy Efficiency of a Fixed-Route Vessel in Short-Sea Shipping
Energy Efficient and Safe Ship Routing using Machine Learning Techniques on Operational and Weather Data