July 2019
·
94 Reads
·
18 Citations
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Objectives: Guided implant surgery (GIS) requires alignment of virtual models to reconstructions of three-dimensional imaging. Accurate visualization of the tooth surfaces in the imaging datasets is mandatory. In this prospective clinical study, in-vivo tooth surface accuracy was determined for GIS using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and dental magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). Materials and methods: CBCT and 3-Tesla dMRI were performed in 22 consecutive patients (mean age: 54.4±15.2 years; mean number of restorations per jaw: 6.7±2.7). Altogether 92 teeth were included (31 incisor, 29 canines, 20 premolars and 12 molars). Surfaces were reconstructed semi-automatically and registered to a reference standard (3D-scans of stone models made from full-arch polyether impressions). Reliability of both methods was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Accuracy was evaluated using the two one-sided tests procedure with a predefined equivalence margin of ± 0.2 mm root mean square(RMS). Results: Inter- and intra-rater reliability of tooth surface reconstruction were comparable for CBCT and dMRI. Geometric deviations were 0.102±0.042 mm RMS for CBCT and 0.261±0.08 mm RMS for dMRI. For a predefined equivalence margin, CBCT and dMRI were statistically equivalent. CBCT, however, was significantly more accurate (p ≤ 0.0001). For both imaging techniques, accuracy did not differ substantially between different tooth types. Conclusion: CBCT is an accurate and reliable imaging technique for tooth surfaces in vivo, even in the presence of metal artifacts. In comparison, dMRI in-vivo accuracy is lower. Still, it allows for tooth surface reconstruction in satisfactory detail and within acceptable acquisition times. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.