Sandrine Pagès's research while affiliated with Aix-Marseille Université and other places

The study of the decomposition of recalcitrant plant biomass is of great interest as the limiting step of terrestrial carbon cycle and to produce plant-derived valuable chemicals and energy. While extracellular cellulose degradation and catabolism have been studied in detail, few publications describe the complete metabolism of hemicelluloses and, to date, the published models are limited to the extracellular degradation and sequential entry of simple sugars.

Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum is a Gram-positive, mesophilic, anaerobic, cellulolytic, and hemicellulolytic bacterium. The last property qualifies this species as a model species for the study of hemicellulose degradation, import of degradation products, and overall regulation of these phenomena. In this study, we focus on the regulation of xyloglucan dextrin import and intracellular degradation and show that the two components of the two-component regulation system XygSR are essential for growth on xyloglucan and that the response regulator XygR regulates the transcription of genes involved in the extracellular degradation of the polysaccharide, the import of degradation products, and their intracellular degradation.

Cellulosomes are complex nanomachines produced by cellulolytic anaerobic bacteria such as Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum (formerly known as Clostridium cellulolyticum). Cellulosomes are composed of a scaffoldin protein displaying several cohesin modules on which enzymatic components can bind to through their dockerin module. Although cellulosomes have been studied for decades, very little is known about the dynamics of complex assembly. We have investigated the ability of some dockerin‐bearing enzymes to chase the catalytic subunits already bound onto a miniscaffoldin displaying a single cohesin. The stability of the preassembled enzyme–scaffoldin complex appears to depend on the nature of the dockerin, and we have identified a key position in the dockerin sequence that is involved in the stability of the complex with the cohesin. Depending on the residue occupying this position, the dockerin can establish with the cohesin partner either a nearly irreversible or a reversible interaction, independently of the catalytic domain associated with the dockerin. Site‐directed mutagenesis of this residue can convert a dockerin able to form a highly stable complex with the miniscaffoldin into a reversible complex forming one and vice versa. We also show that refunctionalization can occur with natural purified cellulosomes. Altogether, our results shed light on the dynamics of cellulosomes, especially their capacity to be remodeled even after their assembly is ‘achieved’, suggesting an unforeseen adaptability of their enzymatic composition over time.

Background: The α-l-arabinofuranosidases (α-l-ABFs) are exoenzymes involved in the hydrolysis of α-l-arabinosyl linkages in plant cell wall polysaccharides. They play a crucial role in the degradation of arabinoxylan and arabinan and they are used in many biotechnological applications. Analysis of the genome of R. cellulolyticum showed that putative cellulosomal α-l-ABFs are exclusively encoded by the xyl-doc gene cluster, a large 32-kb gene cluster. Indeed, among the 14 Xyl-Doc enzymes encoded by this gene cluster, 6 are predicted to be α-l-ABFs belonging to the CAZyme families GH43 and GH62. Results: The biochemical characterization of these six Xyl-Doc enzymes revealed that four of them are α-l-ABFs. GH4316-1229 (RcAbf43A) which belongs to the subfamily 16 of the GH43, encoded by the gene at locus Ccel_1229, has a low specific activity on natural substrates and can cleave off arabinose decorations located at arabinoxylan chain extremities. GH4310-1233 (RcAbf43Ad2,3), the product of the gene at locus Ccel_1233, belonging to subfamily 10 of the GH43, can convert the double arabinose decorations present on arabinoxylan into single O2- or O3-linked decorations with high velocity (kcat = 16.6 ± 0.6 s-1). This enzyme acts in synergy with GH62-1234 (RcAbf62Am2,3), the product of the gene at locus Ccel_1234, a GH62 α-l-ABF which hydrolyzes α-(1 → 3) or α-(1 → 2)-arabinosyl linkages present on polysaccharides and arabinoxylooligosaccharides monodecorated. Finally, a bifunctional enzyme, GH62-CE6-1240 (RcAbf62Bm2,3Axe6), encoded by the gene at locus Ccel_1240, which contains a GH62-α-l-ABF module and a carbohydrate esterase (CE6) module, catalyzes deacylation of plant cell wall polymers and cleavage of arabinosyl mono-substitutions. These enzymes are also active on arabinan, a component of the type I rhamnogalacturonan, showing their involvement in pectin degradation. Conclusion: Arabinofuranosyl decorations on arabinoxylan and pectin strongly inhibit the action of xylan-degrading enzymes and pectinases. α-l-ABFs encoded by the xyl-doc gene cluster of R. cellulolyticum can remove all the decorations present in the backbone of arabinoxylan and arabinan, act synergistically, and, thus, play a crucial role in the degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides.

Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum produces extracellular cellulosomes which contain inter alia numerous Family-9 Glycoside Hydrolases, including the inactive Cel9V. The latter shares the same organization and 79% sequence identity with the active cellulase Cel9E. Nevertheless two aromatic residues, and a four-residue stretch putatively critical for the activity are missing in Cel9V. Introduction of one Trytophan and the four-residue stretch restored some weak activity in Cel9V, whereas the replacement of its catalytic domain by that of Cel9E generated a fully active cellulase. Altogether our data indicate that a series of mutations in the catalytic domain of Cel9V lead to an essentially inactive cellulase. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum and Lachnoclostridium phytofermentans (formerly known as Clostridium cellulolyticum and Clostridium phytofermentans, respectively) are anaerobic bacteria that developed different strategies to depolymerize the cellulose and the related plant cell wall polysaccharides. Thus, R. cellulolyticum produces large extracellular multi-enzyme complexes termed cellulosomes, while L. phytofermentans secretes in the environment some cellulose-degrading enzymes as free enzymes. In the present study, the major cellulase from L. phytofermentans was introduced as a free enzyme or as a cellulosomal component in R. cellulolyticum to improve its cellulolytic capacities. The gene at locus Cphy_3367 encoding the major cellulase Cel9A from L. phytofermentans and an engineered gene coding for a modified enzyme harboring a R. cellulolyticum C-terminal dockerin were cloned in an expression vector. After electrotransformation of R. cellulolyticum, both forms of Cel9A were found to be secreted by the corresponding recombinant strains. On minimal medium containing microcrystalline cellulose as the sole source of carbon, the strain secreting the free Cel9A started to grow sooner and consumed cellulose faster than the strain producing the cellulosomal form of Cel9A, or the control strain carrying an empty expression vector. All strains reached the same final cell density but the strain producing the cellulosomal form of Cel9A was unable to completely consume the available cellulose even after an extended cultivation time, conversely to the two other strains. Analyses of their cellulosomes showed that the engineered form of Cel9A bearing a dockerin was successfully incorporated in the complexes, but its integration induced an important release of regular cellulosomal components such as the major cellulase Cel48F, which severely impaired the activity of the complexes on cellulose. In contrast, the cellulosomes synthesized by the control and the free Cel9A-secreting strains displayed similar composition and activity. Finally, the most cellulolytic strain secreting free Cel9A, was also characterized by an early production of lactate, acetate and ethanol as compared to the control strain. Our study shows that the cellulolytic capacity of R. cellulolyticum can be augmented by supplementing the cellulosomes with a free cellulase originating from L. phytofermentans, whereas integration of the heterologous enzyme in the cellulosomes is rather unfavorable.

Bacterial cellulosomes are generally believed to assemble at random like those produced by Clostridium cellulolyticum. They are composed of one scaffolding protein displaying 8 homologous type I cohesins that bind to any of the type I dockerins borne by the 62 cellulosomal subunits, thus generating highly heterogeneous complexes. In the present study the heterogeneity and random assembly of the cellulosomes were evaluated using a simpler model: a miniscaffoldin containing three C. cellulolyticum cohesins and three cellulases of the same bacterium bearing the cognate dockerin (Cel5A, Cel48F and Cel9G). Surprisingly, in lieu of the anticipated randomized integration of enzymes, the assembly of the minicellulosome generated only three distinct types of complex out of the ten possible combinations, thus indicating preferential integration of enzymes upon binding to the scaffoldin. A hybrid scaffoldin that displays one cohesin from C. cellulolyticum and one from C. thermocellum thus allowing sequential integration of enzymes was exploited to further characterize this phenomenon. The initial binding of a given enzyme onto the C. thermocellum cohesin was found to influence the type of enzyme which is bound subsequently onto the C. cellulolyticum cohesin. The preferential integration appears to be related to the length of the inter-cohesin linker. The data indicate that the binding of a cellulosomal enzyme onto a cohesin has direct influence on the dockerin-bearing proteins that will subsequently interact with adjacent cohesins. Thus, despite the general lack of specificity of the cohesin/dockerin interaction within a given species and type, bacterial cellulosomes are not necessarily assembled at random. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Clostridium cellulolyticum, a mesophilic anaerobic bacterium, produces highly active enzymatic complexes called cellulosomes. This strain was already shown to bind to cellulose, however the molecular mechanism(s) involved is not known. In this context we focused on the gene named hycP, encoding a 250-kDa protein of unknown function, containing a Family-3 Carbohydrate Binding Module (CBM3) along with 23 hyaline repeat modules (HYR modules). In the microbial kingdom the gene hycP is only found in C. cellulolyticum and the very close strain recently sequenced Clostridium sp BNL1100. Its presence in C. cellulolyticum guided us to analyze its function and its putative role in adhesion of the cells to cellulose. The CBM3 of HycP was shown to bind to crystalline cellulose and was assigned to the CBM3b subfamily. No hydrolytic activity on cellulose was found with a mini-protein displaying representative domains of HycP. A C. cellulolyticum inactivated hycP mutant strain was constructed, and we found that HycP is neither involved in binding of the cells to cellulose nor that the protein has an obvious role in cell growth on cellulose. We also characterized the role of the cellulosome scaffolding protein CipC in adhesion of C. cellulolyticum to cellulose, since cellulosome scaffolding protein has been proposed to mediate binding of other cellulolytic bacteria to cellulose. A second mutant was constructed, where cipC was inactivated. We unexpectedly found that CipC is only partly involved in binding of C. cellulolyticum to cellulose. Other mechanisms for cellulose adhesion may therefore exist in C. cellulolyticum. In addition, no cellulosomal protuberances were observed at the cellular surface of C. cellulolyticum, what is in contrast to reports from several other cellulosomes producing strains. These findings may suggest that C. cellulolyticum has no dedicated molecular mechanism to aggregate the cellulosomes at the cellular surface.

Amino-acid sequence alignment of HYR modules identified in HycP. Sequences alignment has been performed using ClustalW2. Stars and grey box indicate identical residues; double dot, strongly similar residues; simple dot, weakly similar residues. Sequence of HYR modules were delimited and numbered as shown in figure 1A. (TIF)