Sandra Dinca Sandru's research while affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz and other places

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in adolescence: validity and reliability of a questionnaire across age-groups
  • Article

August 2014

·

216 Reads

·

57 Citations

Quality of Life Research

Ulrich Klages

·

·

Sandra Dinca Sandru

·

[...]

·

Background Dental malocclusion is a highly prevalent health condition in adolescence. Patients seek treatment primarily for aesthetic reasons. Therapy benefits are regarded, in the first place, to be psychosocial in nature. Therefore, it is mandatory to consider the perspective of the patient in treatment planning and control using a dental-aesthetics-related quality of life measure. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) developed in adult samples including the subscales Dental Self-Confidence, Social Impact, Psychological Impact and Aesthetic Concern is also applicable in adolescents aged 11 years and above. The psychometric properties were examined across three age-groups (11–12, 13–14, 15–17 year olds) with respect to factorial invariance, internal consistency, temporal stability, discriminant validity and gender- or age-associated scale mean differences and item response bias. Method Participants were 1,112 adolescents recruited from 4 institutions: orthodontic and dental practices, schools, and youth clubs. They answered the 23 partially reformulated items of the PIDAQ. Subjective and dentist evaluations of dental occlusion were assessed using the Perception of Occlusion Scale and the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Both indices were aggregated to one Malocclusion Index (MI-S and MI-D). Results The fit indices using confirmatory factor analyses suggested that the factor structure and factor loadings underlying the PIDAQ items were invariant across ages (comparative fit index = 0.91, root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.04). Internal consistency and temporal stability were adequate within the age-groupings (Alpha = 0.71–0.88; intra-class correlations = 0.82–0.96). Adolescents with severe compared to slight malocclusion according to both self-evaluation and dentist evaluation were found to differ in all PIDAQ subscales at a level of p

Share

Citations (1)


... Various tools have been reported in the scienti c literature that allows patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to be measured, extending the measurement by incorporating criteria related to OHRQoL [19][20][21]. The Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) is a PROMs instrument speci cally designed to assess the psychosocial impact of malocclusions on OHRQoL [22,23]. ...

Reference:

Cross-cultural adaptation of PIDAQ questionnaire to evaluate the psychosocial impact of dental esthetics in Chilean adolescents with malocclusion
Psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in adolescence: validity and reliability of a questionnaire across age-groups
  • Citing Article
  • August 2014

Quality of Life Research