Robert V. Zupkis's scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (3)


Informed Consent???Why Are Its Goals Imperfectly Realized?
  • Article

April 1981

·

21 Reads

·

151 Citations

Survey of Anesthesiology

B. R. CASSILETH

·

R. V. ZUPKIS

·

K. SUTTON-SMITH

·

V. MARCH
Share

Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March VInformation and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 92: 832-836

July 1980

·

182 Reads

·

1,025 Citations

Annals of Internal Medicine

The present study explored the degree to which patients prefer to become informed about and to participate in their medical care. A total of 256 cancer patients completed an Information Styles Questionnaire and the Beck Hopelessness Scale. Patients' behavior and beliefs were found to incorporate the contemporary standard of informed and active involvement. Significant age trends were found: The younger the patients, the more closely they conformed to the well-informed participant standard of patient behavior; the older the patients, the more likely they were to prefer the older, nonparticipatory patient role. Patients who wanted to be involved in treatment decisions were significantly more hopeful than others. Most patients in each age group displayed high levels of hope, preferences for open communication about their illness, and a desire for maximum amounts of information.


Informed Consent — Why Are Its Goals Imperfectly Realized?

May 1980

·

1,017 Reads

·

502 Citations

The New-England Medical Review and Journal

We explored reasons for the failure of patients to recall major portions of the information on consent forms and in oral explanations about consent. Within one day of signing consent forms for chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgery, 200 cancer patients completed a test of their recall of the material in the consent explanation and filled out a questionnaire regarding their opinions of its purpose, content, and implications. Only 60 per cent understood the purpose and nature of the procedure, and only 55 per cent correctly listed even one major risk or complication. We found that three factors were related to inadequate recall: education, medical status, and the care with which patients thought they had read their consent forms before signing. Only 40 per cent of the patients had read the form "carefully." Most believed that consent forms were meant to "protect the physician's rights." Although most thought that consent forms were necessary and comprehensible and that they contained worthwhile information, the legalistic connotations of the forms appeared to lead to cursory reading and inadequate recall.

Citations (3)


... Evidence in the literature repeatedly indicates that research participants and patients undergoing medical procedures do not always correctly understand the research protocol involved [7][8][9][10][11]. Besides, most of the research participants may be illiterate and unfamiliar with medical research, especially for trials conducted in low-income countries [12]. ...

Reference:

Longitudinal assessment of an Ebola vaccine trial understanding among healthcare providers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Informed Consent???Why Are Its Goals Imperfectly Realized?
  • Citing Article
  • April 1981

Survey of Anesthesiology

... Nor can we rule out, based on our data, the possibility that COVID-19 HCT volunteerism reflects unmeasured biases related to the perception of risks and benefits, such as optimism bias [10,65]; the so-called preventative or therapeutic fallacy, which reflects a common assumption that any treatment offered by medical professionals must be potentially beneficial [66,67]; or unrealistic beliefs about potential personal gains. To some degree, such concerns can be resolved through a robust informed consent process [25,26,68], which is broadly viewed as possible for COVID-19 HCTs [2,57,[69][70][71]. If, as our findings suggest, volunteers are mostly prepared to take the personal risks associated with such studies to benefit the greater good, then, given the large number of volunteers to come forth in a short amount of time, we can expect that there will be a sufficient number of altruistic volunteers able to provide valid consent to make these trials both ethical and feasible. ...

Informed Consent — Why Are Its Goals Imperfectly Realized?
  • Citing Article
  • May 1980

The New-England Medical Review and Journal

... Physicians and nurses have priorities aligned with patient health, whereas patients may consider other problems they encounter to be of equal priority. Patients' priorities and needs are often not identified and addressed because many patients still do not express their non-medical concerns to their clinicians or other medical staff [18][19][20]. Our previous study showed that only 21% of cancer patients in Poland received psychological support from psychologists and 4% of patients received help from priests [21]. ...

Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March VInformation and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 92: 832-836
  • Citing Article
  • July 1980

Annals of Internal Medicine