Ramesh K. Ramanathan's research while affiliated with Mayo Clinic and other places

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, the overall incidence and mortality from the disease have declined in recent decades. In contrast, there has been a steady increase in the incidence of CRC in individuals under 50 years of age. Hereditary syndromes contribute disproportionately to early onset CRC (EOCRC). These include microsatellite instability high (MSI+) tumors arising in patients with Lynch Syndrome. However, most EOCRCs are not associated with familial syndromes or MSI+ genotypes. Comprehensive genomic profiling has provided the basis of improved more personalized treatments for older CRC patients. However, less is known about the basis of sporadic EOCRC. To define the genomic landscape of EOCRC we used DNA content flow sorting to isolate diploid and aneuploid tumor fractions from 21 non-hereditary cases. We then generated whole exome mutational profiles for each case and whole genome copy number, telomere length, and EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses on subsets of samples. These results discriminate the molecular features of diploid and aneuploid EOCRC and provide a basis for larger population-based studies and the development of effective strategies to monitor and treat this emerging disease.

Purpose: Three agents with differing mechanisms of action are available for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. In this study, we compared the activity and toxicity of three different two-drug combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had not been treated previously for advanced disease. Patients and methods: Patients were concurrently randomly assigned to receive irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin (IFL, control combination), oxaliplatin and infused fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FOLFOX), or irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IROX). The primary end point was time to progression, with secondary end points of response rate, survival time, and toxicity. Results: A total of 795 patients were randomly assigned between May 1999 and April 2001. A median time to progression of 8.7 months, response rate of 45%, and median survival time of 19.5 months were observed for FOLFOX. These results were significantly superior to those observed for IFL for all end points (6.9 months, 31%, and 15.0 months, respectively) or for IROX (6.5 months, 35%, and 17.4 months, respectively) for time to progression and response. The FOLFOX regimen had significantly lower rates of severe nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and dehydration. Sensory neuropathy and neutropenia were more common with the regimens containing oxaliplatin. Conclusion: The FOLFOX regimen of oxaliplatin and infused fluorouracil plus leucovorin was active and comparatively safe. It should be considered as a standard therapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

3083 Background: Cancer-Specific Plectin (CSP) is a novel pro-tumorigenic target that is selectively expressed on the surface of tumors, while absent from benign tissue. CSP is highly expressed in many solid cancers, particularly pancreatic (PC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and ovarian (OC). ZB131 (Zielbio), is a humanized anti-CSP IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to CSP on the surface of tumor cells, rapidly internalizes and modulates key proliferative and cytoskeletal remodeling signaling pathways to decrease cancer cell growth and increase the recruitment of anti-tumor immune infiltrates. Methods: The dose escalation (3+3 design) and expansion are enrolling adult patients (pts) with advanced treatment-refractory solid tumors. ZB131 was administered IV over 60 minutes (without premedication) weekly. The starting dose of ZB131 is 0.3 mg/kg followed by 1,3, 9, 15 and 30 mg/kg. Primary objectives are safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose/determination of Phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives are preliminary efficacy (RECIST v1.1), Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic parameters in blood and paired tumor biopsies. Results: As of 31 Jan 2023, 24 pts had enrolled (9 PC, 6 CCA, 4 OC, 5 other). The median age was 59.5 yr (range, 35 – 84) with a median of 4 prior lines of therapy. The median ZB131 treatment duration is 5.3 weeks (range, 1 – 33). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed up to the dose of 30 mg/kg which is currently enrolling. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1/ 2: nausea (n=6), fatigue (n=5), anemia (n=3), diarrhea (n=2), flulike symptoms (n=2), and vomiting (n=2). Mild flu-like symptoms and nausea/vomiting were observed during or following infusion at doses of 9 mg/kg and above. Except for one episode of Gr 3 neutropenia at the 30 mg/kg dose, no other drug-related grade 3/4 TRAE’s were reported. Five pts had stable disease range, 12 – 33 weeks (2 PC, 1 CCA, 2 OC), with a 43% decrease in CA-125 observed in one OC pt. The PKs are linear and dose-proportional for all dose levels evaluated (estimated T ½ of 6-9 days). No antidrug antibodies have been detected. Conclusions: Interim data from dose-escalation of this first-in-class, anti CSP antibody, demonstrates good tolerability with encouraging signs of activity and target engagement in heavily pretreated pts. Results support further clinical evaluation of ZB131 in dose-expansion cohorts including OC and including combination therapy with gemcitabine. Clinical trial information: NCT 05074472 .

Dilpacimab (formerly ABT-165), a novel dual-variable domain immunoglobulin, targets both delta-like ligand 4 (DLL4) and VEGF pathways. Here, we present safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and preliminary efficacy data from a phase 1 study (trial registration ID: NCT01946074) of dilpacimab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients ({greater than or equal to}18 years) received dilpacimab intravenously on days 1 and 15 in 28-day cycles at escalating dose levels (range, 1.25-7.5 mg/kg) until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. As of August 2018, 55 patients with solid tumors were enrolled in the dilpacimab monotherapy dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included hypertension (60.0%), headache (30.9%), and fatigue (21.8%). A TRAE of special interest was gastrointestinal perforation, occurring in two patients (3.6%; one with ovarian and one with prostate cancer), and resulting in one death. The PK of dilpacimab showed a half-life ranging from 4.9-9.5 days, and biomarker analysis demonstrated that the drug bound to both VEGF and DLL4 targets. The recommended phase 2 dose for dilpacimab monotherapy was established as 3.75 mg/kg, primarily on the basis of tolerability through multiple cycles. A partial response was achieved in 10.9% of patients (including four of 16 patients with ovarian cancer). The remaining patients had either stable disease (52.7%), progressive disease (23.6%), or were deemed unevaluable (12.7%). These results demonstrate that dilpacimab monotherapy has an acceptable safety profile, with clinical activity observed in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Purpose Camptothecin (CPT) analogues topotecan and irinotecan specifically target topoisomerase I (topoI), and are used to treat colorectal, gastric and pancreatic cancer. Patient response rate for this class of drug varies from 10-30% and there is no predictive biomarker for patient stratification by response. Based on our understanding of CPT drug resistance mechanisms, we developed an IHC-based predictive test (P-topoI-Dx) to stratify the responder versus non-responder patient populations. Patients and mthods The retrospective validation studies included a training set of (n=79) and a validation cohort (n=27) of gastric cancer (GC) patients, and eight cohorts of colorectal cancer (CRC) patient tissue (n=176). Progression-free survival for 6 months was considered positive response to CPT-based therapy. FFPE slides were immunohistochemically stained with anti-phosphospecific topoI-Serine10 (topoI-pS10), quantitated and analyzed statistically. Results We determined a threshold of 35% percent positive staining as offering optimal test characteristics in GC. The GC (n=79) training set demonstrated 76.6% (64-86) sensitivity; 68.8% (41-88) specificity; positive predictive value (PPV) 92.5% (81-98); and negative predictive value (NPV) 42.3% (24-62). The GC validation set (n=27) demonstrated 82.4% (56-95) sensitivity and 70.0% (35-92) specificity. Estimated PPV and NPV were 82.4% (56-95) and 70.0% (35-92) respectively. In the CRC validation set (n=176), the 40% threshold demonstrated 87.5% (78-94) sensitivity; 70.0% (59-79) specificity; PPV 70.7% (61-79) and NPV 87.0 % (77-93). Conclusion The analysis of retrospective data from patients (n=275) provides clinical validity to our P-topoI-Dx IHC test to identify the individuals who are more likely to respond to topoI inhibitors.

The article Phase Ib Trial of the PI3K Inhibitor Copanlisib Combined with the Allosteric MEK Inhibitor Refametinib in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Objectives: This analysis investigated nomogram use to evaluate metastatic pancreatic cancer prognosis. Methods: Thirty-four baseline factors were examined in the Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial (MPACT) (nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine) data set. Factors significantly (P < 0.1) associated with overall survival (OS) in a univariable model or with known clinical relevance were tested further. In a multivariable model, factors associated with OS (P < 0.1) were selected to generate the primary nomogram, which was internally validated using bootstrapping, a concordance index, and calibration plots. Results: Using data from 861 patients, 6 factors were retained (multivariable analysis): neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, albumin level, Karnofsky performance status, sum of longest diameter of target lesions, presence of liver metastases, and previous Whipple procedure. The nomogram distinguished low-, medium-, and high-risk groups (concordance index, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.69; median OS, 11.7, 8.0, and 3.3 months, respectively). Conclusions: This nomogram may guide estimates of the range of OS outcomes and contribute to patient stratification in future prospective metastatic pancreatic cancer trials; however, external validation is required to improve estimate reliability and applicability to a general patient population. Caution should be exercised in interpreting these results for treatment decisions: patient characteristics could differ from those included in the nomogram development.

Background Dual inhibition of PI3K and MAPK signaling is conceptually a promising anticancer therapy.Objective This phase 1b trial investigated the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose, pharmacokinetics, tumor response, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) pharmacodynamics, and biomarker explorations for the combination of pan-PI3K inhibitor copanlisib and allosteric MEK inhibitor refametinib in patients with advanced solid tumors.Patients and methodsThis was an adaptive trial with eight dose cohorts combining dose escalation and varying schedules in repeated 28-day cycles. Patients received copanlisib (0.2–0.8 mg/kg intravenously) intermittently (days 1, 8, 15) or weekly (days 1, 8, 15, 22) each cycle, and refametinib (30–50 mg twice daily orally) continuously or 4 days on/3 days off. Patients with KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, or PI3KCA mutations were eligible for the expansion cohort.ResultsIn the dose-escalation (n = 49) and expansion (n = 15) cohorts, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea (59.4%), nausea, acneiform rash, and fatigue (51.6% each). Dose-limiting toxicities included oral mucositis (n = 4), increased alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (n = 3), rash acneiform, hypertension (n = 2 each), and diarrhea (n = 1). MTD was copanlisib 0.4 mg/kg weekly and refametinib 30 mg twice daily. No pharmacokinetic interactions were identified. Decreased tumor FDG uptake and MEK-ERK signaling inhibition were demonstrated during treatment. Best response was stable disease (n = 21); median treatment duration was 6 weeks.Conclusions Despite sound rationale and demonstrable pharmacodynamic tumor activity in relevant tumor populations, a dose and schedule could not be identified for this drug combination that was both tolerable and offered clear efficacy in the population assessed.Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT01392521.

Aim Preclinical evidence suggests that oxidized macrophage migration inhibitory factor (oxMIF) may be involved in carcinogenesis. This phase 1 study (NCT01765790) assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumour activity of imalumab, an oxMIF inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer using ‘3 + 3’ dose escalation. Methods In Schedule 1, patients with solid tumours received doses from 1 to 50 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. In Schedule 2, patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, non‐small‐cell lung, or ovarian cancer received weekly doses of 10 or 25 mg/kg IV (1 cycle = 28 days). Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, dose‐limiting toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Results Fifty of 68 enrolled patients received imalumab. The most common treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) included fatigue (10%) and vomiting (6%); four grade 3 serious TRAEs (two patients) occurred. The dose‐limiting toxicity was allergic alveolitis (one patient, 50 mg/kg every 2 weeks). The maximum tolerated and biologically active doses were 37.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks and 10 mg/kg weekly, respectively. Of 39 assessed patients, 13 had stable disease (≥4 months in 8 patients). Conclusions Imalumab had a maximum tolerated dose of 37.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours, with a biologically active dose of 10 mg/kg weekly. Further investigation will help define the role of oxMIF as a cancer treatment target.

This first-in-human phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and preliminary efficacy of telisotuzumab, formerly called ABT-700, an antagonistic antibody directed against c-Met. For dose-escalation (3+3 design), three to six patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled into four dose cohorts (5-25 mg/kg). In the dose-expansion phase, a subset of patients were prospectively selected for MET amplification (FISH screening). Patients received telisotuzumab intravenously on day 1 every 21 days. For dose expansion, 15 mg/kg was chosen as the dose on the basis of safety, pharmacokinetics, and other data from the escalation cohorts. Forty-five patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of telisotuzumab (dose escalation, n=15; dose expansion, n=30). Telisotuzumab showed a linear pharmacokinetics profile; peak plasma concentration was proportional to dose level. There were no acute infusion reactions and no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The most common treatment-related adverse events included hypoalbuminemia (n=9, 20.0%) and fatigue (n=5, 11.1%). By Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), four of 10 (40.0%) patients with MET-amplified tumors had confirmed partial response in target lesions (one ovarian, two gastric, and one esophageal), two (20.0%) had stable disease, three (30.0%) had progressive disease; one patient was unable to be evaluated. Among patients with nonamplified tumors (n=35), no objective responses were observed; however, 11 patients had stable disease per RECIST criteria. In conclusion, telisotuzumab has an acceptable safety profile with clinical activity observed in patients with MET-amplified advanced solid tumors.