Lester Cardoz's research while affiliated with Symbiosis Institute of Technology and other places

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Fig. 1 Structure of rolling-element bearing
Fig. 2 A neuron
Fig. 3 Autoencoder architecture
Fig. 4 System architecture
Random forest classification results Normal (%) Inner race (%) Normal (%) Outer race (%)

+3

Bearing Fault Detection Using Comparative Analysis of Random Forest, ANN, and Autoencoder Methods
  • Chapter
  • Full-text available

June 2021

·

1,312 Reads

·

12 Citations

·

Pallavi Marni

·

Lester Cardoz

·

[...]

·

The manufacturing industry is currently witnessing a huge revolution in terms of the Industry 4.0 paradigm, which aims to automate most of the manufacturing processes from condition monitoring of the machinery to optimizing production efficiency with automated robots and digital twins. One such valuable contribution of the Industry 4.0 paradigm is the concept of predictive maintenance (PdM), which aims to explore the contributions of artificial intelligence to get meaningful insights into the health of the machinery to enable timely maintenance. As majority of these machineries consist of bearings, bearing fault detection using artificial intelligence has been a popular choice for researchers. This paper provides a systematic literature survey of the existing research works in bearing fault detection. Further in this paper, we have done comparative analysis of bearing fault detection using the techniques of random forest classification, artificial neural network, and autoencoder on the benchmarked dataset provided by CWRU. The deep learning model of autoencoders provides the highest accuracy of 91% over the algorithms of artificial neural network and random forest.

Download
Share

Citations (1)


... A comparative study between the random forest algorithm and the XGBoost classifier is performed that give a highest accuracy of 99,14 % and 99,30 %, respectively, for the RF and the XGBoost classifiers. In more recent research [12], both of deep learning and machine learning classifiers are used to monitor bearing faults based on vibration signals provided by the CWRU. Among three ensemble classifiers, such as artificial neural network, random forests, and a deep learner autoencoder, the autoencoder excels the other classifiers with a high classification rate of 91%. ...

Reference:

Diagnosis and Monitoring Method for Detecting and Localizing Bearing Faults
Bearing Fault Detection Using Comparative Analysis of Random Forest, ANN, and Autoencoder Methods