January 2016
·
18 Reads
·
1 Citation
Nikolai Timofeeff-Ressovsky understood well the need for both explicit theory and quantitation in biology. His adventures with Karl Zimmer and Max Delbrück and the somewhat romantic portrayal of those ideas by Erwin Schrödinger contributed notably to the development of population genetics and led to the modern theory of mutation. A central mystery in Timofeeff’s time was the size and composition of the gene, which he probed by the methods of radiation mutagenesis. A subsequent central mystery has been whether order may somehow underlie the apparent chaos of mutation rates . Although the first hints of order appeared in the late 1960s, the robustness of certain formulations of mutation rates did not become apparent until the 1990s. It is now clear that each of four major groups of organisms has its own characteristic rate of spontaneous mutation. The riboviruses hover at the edge of mutational meltdown, the retroelements live a few-fold less dangerously, the DNA-based microbes maintain a very small genomic rate (except in special circumstances), and the higher eukaryotes seem to have adopted a rate only a few-fold higher than the DNA-based microbes (with remarkable consequences over the course of a sexual generation). The evolutionary forces driving these characteristic rates are poorly understood.