John N Eble's research while affiliated with Indiana University School of Medicine and other places

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques are increasingly being explored as an emerging ancillary technique for improving accuracy and reproducibility of histopathological diagnosis. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a malignancy responsible for 2% of cancer deaths worldwide. Given that RCC is a heterogenous disease, accurate histopathological classification is essential to separate aggressive subtypes from indolent ones and benign mimickers. There are early promising results using AI for RCC classification to distinguish between 2 and 3 subtypes of RCC. However, it is not clear how an AI-based model designed for multiple subtypes of RCCs, and benign mimickers would perform which is a scenario closer to the real practice of pathology. A computational model was created using 252 whole slide images (WSI) (clear cell RCC: 56, papillary RCC: 81, chromophobe RCC: 51, clear cell papillary RCC: 39, and, metanephric adenoma: 6). 298,071 patches were used to develop the AI-based image classifier. 298,071 patches (350 × 350-pixel) were used to develop the AI-based image classifier. The model was applied to a secondary dataset and demonstrated that 47/55 (85%) WSIs were correctly classified. This computational model showed excellent results except to distinguish clear cell RCC from clear cell papillary RCC. Further validation using multi-institutional large datasets and prospective studies are needed to determine the potential to translation to clinical practice.

Mixed epithelial and stromal tumour of the kidney is a complex benign neoplasm in which malignancy rarely arises. In this study, we report four mixed epithelial and stromal tumours in which sarcoma or carcinoma developed. In the first, a multifocal adenocarcinoma arose and areas of transition from benign to malignant epithelium were observed. Oestrogen and progesterone receptors were diffusely present in the nuclei of the spindle cell stroma of the benign component. The second was a sarcoma in which benign epithelial elements were intermixed. Outside the renal parenchyma, clusters of small benign glands surrounded by oestrogen receptor-positive benign stroma were present, supporting the diagnosis of mixed epithelial and stromal tumour. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation for SYT-SSX translocation and immunohistochemical results, specifically TLE1 -ativity, argued against primary renal synovial sarcoma. The patient died 24 months after surgery. The third tumour consisted of small blue round cells, positive for epithelial membrane antigen, BCL2, CD99, and FLI1. Throughout the tumour, the presence of benign appearing branching tubules in fibromuscular stroma, reactive for smooth muscle actin, desmin and progesterone receptor, supported the diagnosis of mixed epithelial and stromal tumour in which a small round blue cell sarcoma with EWSR1 rearrangement arose. In the fourth tumour, adenocarcinoma with papillary architecture arose in a typical mixed epithelial and stromal tumour. In summary, we present four cases of mixed epithelial and stromal tumour with malignant transformation, two showing carcinomatous and the other two with sarcomatous transformation. Identification of typical benign looking elements and the absence of SYT-SSX translocation are helpful in recognition of this entity.

We evaluated the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of mostly incidentally detected, small, papillary renal neoplasms with reverse polarity (PRNRP). The cohort comprised 50 PRNRP from 46 patients, divided into 2 groups. The clinically undetected (<5 mm) neoplasms (n = 34; 68%) had a median size of 1.1 mm (range 0.2–4.3 mm; mean 1.4 mm), and the clinically detected (≥5 mm) neoplasms (n = 16; 32%) which had a median size of 13 mm (range 9–30 mm; mean 16 mm). Neoplasms were positive for GATA3 (n = 47; 100%) and L1CAM (n = 34/38; 89%) and were negative for vimentin (n = 0/44; 0%) and, to a lesser extent, AMACR [(n = 12/46; 26%; weak = 9, weak/moderate = 3)]. KRAS mutations were found in 44% (n = 15/34) of the clinically undetected PRNRP and 88% of the clinically detected PRNRP (n = 14/16). The two clinically detected PRNRP with wild-type KRAS gene were markedly cystic and contained microscopic intracystic tumors. In the clinically undetected PRNRP, the detected KRAS mutations rate was higher in those measuring ≥1 mm vs <1 mm [n = 14/19 (74%) vs n = 1/15 (7%)]. Overall, the KRAS mutations were present in exon 2—codon 12: c.35 G > T (n = 21), c.34 G > T (n = 3), c.35 G > A (n = 2), c.34 G > C (n = 2) resulting in p.Gly12Val, p. Gly12Asp, p.Gly12Cys and p.Gly12Arg, respectively. One PRNRP had a G12A/V/D complex mutation. Twenty-six PRNRP were concurrently present with other tumors of different histologic subtypes in the ipsilateral kidney; molecular testing of 8 of the latter showed wild-type KRAS gene despite the presence of KRAS mutations in 5 concurrent PRNRP. On follow up, no adverse pathologic events were seen (range 1–160 months; mean 44 months). In conclusion, the presence of KRAS mutations in small, clinically undetected PRNRP provides a unique finding to this entity and supports its being an early event in the development of these neoplasms.

Thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinoma is an uncommon kidney tumor with no distinct molecular alteration described to date. This cohort of eight women with mean and median ages of 45 and 46 years, respectively (range 19–65 years), had unencapsulated, well-circumscribed tumors composed of tightly packed anastomosing follicle-like cysts filled with eosinophilic colloid-like material and lined by cuboidal cells with high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios, oval to elongated nuclei with perpendicular arrangement toward the lumens, and prominent nuclear overlapping. The stroma between these was minimal with the exception of two tumors. Calcifications and necrosis were absent. Immunohistochemically, the tumors were positive for KRT19 (7/7), PAX8 (5/5), cyclin D1 (6/6), KRT7 (5/7), and AMACR (1/5; focal, weak), and were negative for WT1, TTF1 (transcription termination factor-1), and thyroglobulin. In three of three tumors tested molecularly, EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion was identified by RNA sequencing and confirmed by RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing. Over a follow-up period of 1–7 years, no evidence of recurrence or metastasis has been detected. The EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion has been recognized as a recurrent alteration in a subset of round to spindle cell sarcomas with EWSR1–non-ETS fusions (EWSR1-PATZ1 sarcoma) and in several central nervous system tumors. The finding of an EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion in all three of the thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinomas for which sufficient tissue was available for genomic profiling provides the first distinct molecular abnormality in thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinomas, supporting its designation as a distinct diagnostic entity.

The classification system for neoplasms of the cells lining the renal tubules (renal cell neoplasms) has expanded greatly over the last five decades. The criteria for recognising an entity and including it in the classification have changed from being purely morphological and clinical to include genetics; presently, some are defined purely on genetics. Expansion of the number of entities included in the classification has many of the newly included entities and those under consideration for inclusion being very rare. The clinical utility of including entities which are extremely rare, based mainly upon genetic information, is unclear.

Formal staging classifications for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were first proposed in 1978 and were incorporated into the Tumour, Nodes, Metastases (TNM) system initially published by the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) in 1978. There has been a gradual evolution of grading criteria through six separate editions of the UICC TNM Classification, with the latest edition being published in 2016. Somewhat surprisingly there were no changes to the T category criteria from the 2009 to the 2016 editions of the classification, although an erratum has subsequently been published that incorporated the minor changes included in the eighth edition of the TNM Classification published by the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Localised tumours are staged according to the size of the primary tumour, with the TNM classification recognising that these tumours may exceed 10 cm in diameter. This is unfortunate as there is good evidence to demonstrate that, for clear cell RCC, virtually all tumours >7 cm in diameter and a substantial proportion of tumours <7 cm in diameter, show extra-renal spread. Infiltration of tumour beyond the renal capsule into the peri-renal fat is also categorised as T3a, however the clinical importance of this remains unclear. The classification of microvascular invasion within the renal sinus requires clarification, as does the prognostic significance of tumour in small vessels within the kidney.

TFE3-fusion associated renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-RCC) accounts for up to 5% adults and 40% of childhood RCC. Their comprehensive immunohistochemical (IHC) profile in correlation to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing and their role in the diagnostic approach are not well documented because of lacking published data. FISH confirmed TFE3-RCC between years 2010 and 2020 were identified from institutional electronic database and retrospectively reviewed. Eighty-five TFE3-RCC were identified. Seventy-six of 85 (89.4%) TFE3-RCC cases had positive TFE3 expression, with diffuse and strong/moderate TFE3 expression in 45 (54.2%). Three (3.5%) TFE3-RCC had negative TFE3 expression whereas 6 (7%) cases had equivocal TFE3 expression. On the other hand, positive TFE3-IHC expression was observed in 17/29 (58.6%) TFE3-FISH negative RCC cases, although only 8 (27.5%) had diffuse and moderate/strong TFE3 expression. Diffuse and strong TFE3-IHC expression was statistically significant in predicting TFE3-FISH positivity (P<0.0001) regardless of morphologic features. After univariate and multivariate analyses, TFE3-IHC was the only parameter with significant predictive value for detecting positive TFE3-FISH (P<0.0001). On univariate analysis, sex, classic morphology, age, negative AE1/AE3 or cytokeratin 7 were not predictive of TFE3-FISH positivity. Diffuse and strong nuclear TFE3-IHC expression is significantly associated with TFE3-FISH positivity and can be used as a surrogate marker to confirm translocation associated cases. TFE3-rearranged RCCs show variable histomorphologic features and TFE3-FISH should be performed in cases presenting at a younger age or, regardless of the age, tumors with unusual morphology. Despite previous reports, negative pancytokeratin and positive cathepsin K expression may not be reliable markers for TFE3-RCC.