Janet C. Harries's research while affiliated with University of Leicester and other places

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (5)


Figure 1. CBP-SID interacts with the nuclear export factor CAS. (A) Quantitative β-galactosidase assays showing reporter activities in cell-free extracts of S.cerevisiae L40 expressing DBD LexA-CBP 19822163 with VP16 acidic domain (AAD) or CAS-N 1-349. Schematic representation of CAS-N isolated in the yeast two-hybrid screen and the full length protein. Shaded boxes refer to coding sequence; un-shaded boxes correspond to sequence derived from the 5'-UTR or intronic sequence in the cDNA. Ran Binding Domain (RBD), Heptad Repeats (HR) 21. (B) Yeast two-hybrid interaction of AAD-CAS (1-349) with a series of DBD LexA-CBP fusion proteins. Reporter assays were carried out as in (A). A schematic representation of the CBP sequence 2058-2163 is shown, indicating four putative αHelices H1 to H4 (black boxes) and the QPGM/L repeat sequences (black triangles). (C) Yeast two-hybrid interaction between CAS-N and a series of LexA-CBP-SID fusion constructs containing point mutations. CBP sequences are represented schematically, and the black box denotes the minimal SID as previously described. (D) Yeast two-hybrid interaction of DBD lexA-CBP with CAS-N and CAS-N∆244-253. (E) COS1 cells were transiently transfected with FLAG CAS-N (upper panels) or FLAG CAS-N and pSG5CBP (lower panels). After 48 hrs the cells were fixed and stained with antibodies to detect FLAG (green) or CBP (red) proteins. Yellow color in the merged image denotes colocalization. 
Figure 2 of 3
Figure 3 of 3
Functional Interaction of CREB Binding Protein (CBP) with Nuclear Transport Proteins and Modulation by HDAC Inhibitors
  • Article
  • Full-text available

October 2006

·

166 Reads

·

26 Citations

Cell Cycle

Cell Cycle

·

Janet C Harries

·

·

[...]

·

Nuclear transport proteins such as CSE1, NUP93 and Importin-alpha have recently been shown to be chromatin-associated proteins in yeast, which have unexpected functions in gene regulation. Here we report interactions between the mammalian histone acetyltransferase CBP with nuclear transport proteins CAS (a CSE1 homologue) and Importin-alpha (Impalpha) and NUP93. CAS was found to bind the SRC1 interaction domain (SID) of CBP via a leucine-rich motif in the N-terminus of the protein, that is conserved in other SID-binding proteins. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments also revealed that CBP and Impalpha proteins form a complex. As Impalpha is a known acetylation target of CBP/p300, and is recycled to the cytoplasm via the exportin CAS, we investigated whether HDAC inhibitors would alter the subcellular localization of these proteins. Treatment of COS-1 cells with the HDAC inhibitors trichostatin A or sodium butyrate resulted in sequestration of Impalpha in the nuclear envelope, accumulation of CAS in nuclear aggregates, and an increased number of CBP-containing PML bodies per cell. In addition, HDACi treatment appeared to enhance the association of Impalpha and CBP in coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Our results provide evidence for novel functional interactions between the chromatin modification enzyme CBP and nuclear transport proteins in mammalian cells.

Download
Share

A Conserved -Helical Motif Mediates the Binding of Diverse Nuclear Proteins to the SRC1 Interaction Domain of CBP

May 2004

·

157 Reads

·

31 Citations

Journal of Biological Chemistry

CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300 contain modular domains that mediate protein-protein interactions with a wide variety of nuclear factors. A C-terminal domain of CBP (referred to as the SID) is responsible for interaction with the α-helical AD1 domain of p160 coactivators such as the steroid receptor coactivator (SRC1), and also other transcriptional regulators such as E1A, Ets-2, IRF3, and p53. Here we show that the pointed (PNT) domain of Ets-2 mediates its interaction with the CBP SID, and describe the effects of mutations in the SID on binding of Ets-2, E1A, and SRC1. In vitro binding studies indicate that SRC1, Ets-2 and E1A display mutually exclusive binding to the CBP SID. Consistent with this, we observed negative cross-talk between ERα/SRC1, Ets-2, and E1A proteins in reporter assays in transiently transfected cells. Transcriptional inhibition of Ets-2 or GAL4-AD1 activity by E1A was rescued by co-transfection with a CBP expression plasmid, consistent with the hypothesis that the observed inhibition was due to competition for CBP in vivo. Sequence comparisons revealed that SID-binding proteins contain a leucine-rich motif similar to the α-helix Aα1 of the SRC1 AD1 domain. Deletion mutants of E1A and Ets-2 lacking the conserved motif were unable to bind the CBP SID. Moreover, a peptide corresponding to this sequence competed the binding of full-length SRC1, Ets-2, and E1A proteins to the CBP SID. Thus, a leucine-rich amphipathic α-helix mediates mutually exclusive interactions of functionally diverse nuclear proteins with CBP.


Figure 3 (A) Schematic representation of SRC1 constructs cloned in the Yep20 expression vector. Functional domains (as in Fig. 2) are indicated. (B) and (C) Effect of SRC1 constructs on DBD-PR mediated reporter activation in the presence or absence of ligand as indicated. 
Figure 4 (A) Transcriptional activity of DBD-SRC1 constructs in yeast containing the AD1 and AD2 domains as indicated. (B) Deletion mapping of SRC1 AD1 region to identify the sequence responsible for transcriptional activity. Helix A and Helix B sequences are denoted by the black boxes. (C) Sequence of the region encoding Helix A. The α-helical region as defined in the CBP/ACTR interaction domain structure Demarest et al, 2002, is indicated. 
Transcriptional activation by estrogen receptor (ERalpha) and steroid receptor coactivator (SRC1) involves distinct mechanisms in yeast and mammalian cells

July 2003

·

114 Reads

·

8 Citations

Journal of Molecular Endocrinology

Steroid receptors activate transcription in yeast cells via interactions with endogenous coactivators and/or basal factors. We examined the effects of mutations in the ligand binding domain on the transcriptional activity of ERalpha in yeast. Our results show that mutations in Helix 3 (K366A) and Helix 12 (M547A, L548A) disrupt transcriptional activity of ERalpha in yeast, as previously observed in mammalian cells. However, replacement of a conserved tyrosine residue in Helix 12 with alanine or aspartate (Y541A and Y541D), which renders ERalpha constitutively active in mammalian cells, had only a weak stimulatory effect on ligand-independent reporter activation by ERalpha in yeast. Two-hybrid interaction experiments revealed that a Y541A mutant expressed in yeast was capable of ligand-independent binding to a mammalian coactivator, suggesting that there is a subtle difference in how this mutant interacts with mammalian and yeast cofactors. We also show that the ligand-dependent activities of ERalpha and progesterone receptor (PR) in yeast cells were strongly enhanced by the human p160 protein steroid receptor coactivator (SRC1), but not by CREB-Binding Protein (CBP) or the p300/CBP associated factor (P/CAF). Although the SRC1 activation domains AD1 and AD2 are functional in yeast, deletion of these sequences only partially impaired SRC1 coactivator function in this organism; this is in contrast to similar experiments in mammalian cells. Thus SRC1 sequences involved in recruitment of CBP/p300 and Co-Activator-Associated Arginine Methyltransferase (CARM-1) in mammalian cells are not essential for its function in yeast, suggesting that SRC1 operates via distinct mechanisms in yeast and mammalian cells.


FIG. 1. The CBP interaction domain in SRC1 maps to amino acids 926 to 970. (A) The interaction between SRC1 and a C-terminal region of CBP was examined in a yeast two-hybrid system. S. cerevisiae L40 was cotransformed with LexA-CBP 1982-2163 and the plasmid pASV3 expressing the acidic activation domain (411 to 490) of VP16 (VP16 AD), or a series of SRC1 constructs were fused in frame with VP16 AD. The SRC1 sequences are represented schematically by grey rectangles, and the putative helices A and B are depicted by black boxes. Reporter activity in cell extracts is expressed in terms of units of-galactosidase activity. The results from a representative experiment are shown, and similar results were obtained in triplicate experiments. Western blots using anti-LexA and anti-VP16 AD antibodies (Santa Cruz) confirmed that the levels of the bait protein did not vary significantly between different clones and that the levels of VP16 AD1 were similar in all transformants. (B) Sequence alignment of the CBP interaction domain in SRC1 with the corresponding regions in TIF2 and pCIP. The positions of the predicted-helices and the CBP interaction domain as identified in panel A are indicated. Identical residues present in all three proteins are boxed.
FIG. 2. Two predicted ␣ -helices in the CBP interaction domain of SRC1 are required in order to maintain interaction with CBP. (A) Glutathione-Sepharose-bound GST, GST-AD1 (781 to 988 of SRC1), and GST–CBP-C (1891 to 2165) were incubated with 35 S-labeled full-length SRC1e, pCAF, or CBP-C. Bound proteins were eluted and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. One-tenth of the total labeled protein used in each binding reaction is shown for comparative purposes (10% input). (B) Sequences of synthetic peptides used in competition experiments are shown, with the positions of the predicted helices indicated. (C) Competition experiment showing the effect of increasing concentrations of the competitor peptides on the interaction of GST-AD1 with in vitro-translated 35 S-labeled full-length SRC1. (D) Cos-1 cells were transiently transfected as described in Materials and Methods with a GAL4 reporter construct (pGAL4-E16 ⌬ LUC) and 1 ␮ g of vector expressing either GAL4 or the fusion protein GAL4-SRC 926-970. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h later, and the data were normalized to ␤ -galactosidase activity. The activity of GAL4 alone was set at 1, and GAL4-SRC 926-970 activity is expressed relative to it. The values shown represent the average of triplicate samples, and the error bars indicate standard deviation. 
FIG. 3. The SID in CBP maps to amino acids 2058 to 2130. (A) Yeast two-hybrid interactions between VP16 AD1 (SRC1 900-970) and a series of LexA-CBP fusion proteins were assayed as described in the legend to Fig. 1. A schematic representation of the CBP sequence 1982 to 2163 is shown at the top, with the relative positions of four putative ␣ -helices (H1 to H4 [black boxes]) and the QPGM/L repeat sequences (triangles) indicated. CBP sequences are represented schematically below by grey rectangles, whereas the black rectangle denotes the minimal SRC1 interaction domain mapped in these experiments. Reporter activity is expressed in terms of units of ␤ -galactosidase activity, and the results of a representative experiment are shown. Similar results were obtained in triplicate experiments. Western blots confirmed that all LexA constructs were expressed at comparable levels and that VP16 AD1 levels were similar in all cell extracts. (B) Effect of mutations in the SID sequence on its interaction with SRC1 AD1. Yeast two-hybrid interactions between LexA-CBP 2058-2130 mutants and VP16 AD1 were assayed. The LexA-CBP constructs are shown schematically, and the boxed regions represent the relative positions of H1 to H3 and the QPGM/L region. Construct L-2071/2/5-A indicates alteration of leucines at positions 2071, 2072, and 2075 to alanine; similar nomenclature is used for the other constructs. The relative position of each mutation in relation to the predicted ␣ -helices or the QPGM/L motifs is indicated with black circles. Western blots confirmed similar expression of LexA constructs. (C) GST pull-down experiments showing the effects of mutations in the SID on binding of SRC1e. The CBP 2058-2130 fragments identical to those shown in panel B were expressed as GST fusion proteins, and their abilities to bind in vitro-translated 35 S-labeled full-length SRC1e were assayed as for Fig. 2A. 
FIG. 4. Direct binding of CBP to the ER is weak. (A) GST pull- down assays were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 2A. Glutathione-Sepharose-bound GST, GST-AF1 (containing the ligand- independent activation function of ER), or GST-AF2 (containing the ligand-dependent activation function of ER) was incubated with 35 S- labeled full-length SRC1e or CBP in the presence of 10 Ϫ 6 M E2 or vehicle as indicated. Bound proteins were eluted and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Ten percent of the total labeled protein used in each binding reaction is shown for comparative pur- poses (10% in). (B) Immunoprecipitation assays were performed by incubating anti-HA tag antibody and protein A-protein G agarose beads with 35 S-labeled full-length CBP, which contains an N-terminal HA tag, and/or SRC1e as indicated. Bound proteins were eluted and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Ten percent of the total labeled protein used in each reaction is shown for comparative pur- poses (10% input). 
FIG. 6. Mutation of LXXLL motifs in the context of the SRC1 minimal coactivator abrogates activity. A schematic diagram is shown representing full-length SRC1 (see the legend to Fig. 5A for details of the functional domains indicated by grey boxes) and the deletion constructs spanning the core coactivator domains and containing mutations in which the leucine doublet in two or more LXXLL motifs was mutated to alanines. Cos-1 cells were transfected as described in Materials and Methods with appropriate reporter constructs, vector expressing ER, and the SRC1 constructs as indicated. Luciferase activity was measured 24 h after the addition of 10 Ϫ 8 M E2, and the data were normalized to ␤ -galactosidase activity. The activity of ER in the presence of ligand was set at 1, and the other values are expressed relative to it. The values shown represent the average of triplicate samples, and the error bars indicate standard deviation. The results shown are representative of experiments performed at least three times. 
Analysis of the Steroid Receptor Coactivator 1 (SRC1)-CREB Binding Protein Interaction Interface and Its Importance for the Function of SRC1

February 2001

·

248 Reads

·

116 Citations

Molecular and Cellular Biology

The transcriptional activity of nuclear receptors is mediated by coactivator proteins, including steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC1) and its homologues and the general coactivators CREB binding protein (CBP) and p300. SRC1 contains an activation domain (AD1) which functions via recruitment of CBP and and p300. In this study, we have used yeast two-hybrid and in vitro interaction-peptide inhibition experiments to map the AD1 domain of SRC1 to a 35-residue sequence potentially containing two α-helices. We also define a 72-amino-acid sequence in CBP necessary for SRC1 binding, designated the SRC1 interaction domain (SID). We show that in contrast to SRC1, direct binding of CBP to the estrogen receptor is weak, suggesting that SRC1 functions primarily as an adaptor to recruit CBP and p300. In support of this, we show that the ability of SRC1 to enhance ligand-dependent nuclear receptor activity in transiently transfected cells is dependent upon the integrity of the AD1 region. In contrast, the putative histone acetyltransferase domain, the Per-Arnt-Sim basic helix-loop-helix domain, the glutamine-rich domain, and AD2 can each be removed without loss of ligand-induced activity. Remarkably, a construct corresponding to residues 631 to 970, which contains only the LXXLL motifs and the AD1 region of SRC1, retained strong coactivator activity in our assays.


Citations (4)


... SRC-1 also interacts with a region known as the AF-1 in the NTD of the AR, which appears functionally more important than the SRC-1/AR-LBD interaction for AR-mediated transcriptional activation ( Figure 4) [159]. CBP/p300 is recruited to nuclear receptor complexes through an interaction between SRC's CBP/p300 interaction domain (CID) and CBP/p300's SRC interaction domain (SID) ( Figure 4) [51, 155,[162][163][164]. Notably, the LXXLL motif is also found in CBP/p300 for direct nuclear receptor binding [161]. ...

Reference:

CBP/p300: Critical Co-Activators for Nuclear Steroid Hormone Receptors and Emerging Therapeutic Targets in Prostate and Breast Cancers
Analysis of the Steroid Receptor Coactivator 1 (SRC1)-CREB Binding Protein Interaction Interface and Its Importance for the Function of SRC1

Molecular and Cellular Biology

... Firstly, while it has a hydrophobic core and globular shape, NCBD is a very dynamic protein domain with characteristics of an IDP 5,6,[8][9][10][11]26 . Secondly, NCBD has several binding partners including the three NCOA transcriptional co-regulator paralogs 5,27 , the transcription factors p53 28 , Ets-2 29 , and interferon factor-3 30 , and viral proteins such as Tax 31 from the T-cell leukemia virus. Intriguingly, NCBD displays great conformational plasticity as shown by its complex with interferon factor-3 where the helices of NCBD adopt a distinct conformation as compared to the complex with CID 32 . ...

A Conserved -Helical Motif Mediates the Binding of Diverse Nuclear Proteins to the SRC1 Interaction Domain of CBP

Journal of Biological Chemistry

... In humans, steroid receptor cofactor I (SRC1) binds to a number of nuclear hormone receptors within the nucleus and helps stimulate transcriptional activity. Co-expression of SRC1a or SRC1e with hERα led to an increase in estradiol induced signaling in S. cerevisiae; however, studies with fragmented proteins indicated a different binding mechanism was responsible than that in mammalian cells (Sheppard et al., 2003). Nevertheless, SRC1 co-expression has been successfully incorporated into EDC biosensors. ...

Transcriptional activation by estrogen receptor (ERalpha) and steroid receptor coactivator (SRC1) involves distinct mechanisms in yeast and mammalian cells

Journal of Molecular Endocrinology

... Autoacetylation also affects P300 interaction with other proteins and their stability, playing a signi cant role in various cellular processes and disease states (41). In this direction, Trichostatin A, the most well-characterized HDAC paninhibitor, has been found to promote P300 stabilization and lysine acetylation on some substrates, including transcription factors, signaling proteins, or structural histones (40,42). This effect has been associated with P300 autoacetylation and association with speci c targets, including the retinoic acid receptor alpha or the kinase HIPK2 (43). ...

Functional Interaction of CREB Binding Protein (CBP) with Nuclear Transport Proteins and Modulation by HDAC Inhibitors
Cell Cycle

Cell Cycle