Ismael's scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Fig. 1. Map of Laredo and Nuevo Laredo in the Texas Lower Rio Grande Valley. Source: Schmandt et al. (2000).  
Fig. 2. Accountability model for water services (adapted from the 2004 World Development Report, World Bank, 2004).  
Public accountability and performance of two border water utilities
  • Article
  • Full-text available

April 2010

·

300 Reads

·

6 Citations

Water Policy

·

Ismael

We analyze the performance of two water utilities located at the USA Mexico border with a focus on public accountability. We evaluate selected performance indicators and explain how public accountability mechanisms can be associated with those outcomes. We find strong hierarchical accountability relationships between policymakers and water services providers but weak feedback mechanisms from customers to policymakers; moreover, structural barriers to political accountability resulting in weak accountability mechanisms may explain different facets of the relatively poor performance of both water utilities. Our findings suggest the need for these water utilities to build a closer relationship with their customers and to implement customer service indicators to track their performance.

Download
Share

Citations (1)


... It stresses how the lack of accountability and transparency leads to various types of dysfunctions and difficulties. Weak political accountability and weak feedback mechanisms from customers to policymakers are regularly invoked to explain the poor performance of water utilities (Aguilar-Benitez, Saphores, 2010). Conversely, many authors emphasize that strengthening accountability through extensive public participation allows water service providers to improve their performance in terms of pricing and investment (Lobina, Hall, 2007). ...

Reference:

Institutional perspectives on water services
Public accountability and performance of two border water utilities

Water Policy