Guangyu An's research while affiliated with Capital Medical University and other places

Purpose The variable responses to immunotherapy observed in gastric cancer (GC) patients can be attributed to the intricate nature of the tumor microenvironment. Glutathione (GSH) metabolism significantly influences the initiation and progression of gastric cancer. Consequently, targeting GSH metabolism holds promise for improving the effectiveness of Immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs). Methods We investigated 16 genes related to GSH metabolism, sourced from the MSigDB database, using pan-cancer datasets from TCGA. The most representative prognosis-related gene was identified for further analysis. ScRNA-sequencing analysis was used to explore the tumor heterogeneity of GC, and the results were confirmed by Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC). Results Through DEGs, LASSO, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and survival analysis, we identified GGT5 as the hub gene in GSH metabolism with the potential to promote GC. Combining CIBERSORT, ssGSEA, and scRNA analysis, we constructed the immune architecture of GC. The subpopulations of T cells were isolated, revealing a strong association between GGT5 and memory CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, specimens from 10 GC patients receiving immunotherapy were collected. mIHC was used to assess the expression levels of GGT5 and memory CD8+ T cell markers. Our results established a positive correlation between GGT5 expression, the enrichment of memory CD8+ T cells, and a suboptimal response to immunotherapy. Conclusions Our study identifies GGT5, a hub gene in GSH metabolism, as a potential therapeutic target for inhibiting the response to immunotherapy in GC patients. These findings offer new insights into strategies for optimizing immunotherapy of GC.

Numerous studies and clinical trials have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors can effectively prevent tumor growth and metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the anti-tumor effects of PD-1 antibody preventive treatment in patients with early stages ESCC as well as patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN). We first established an ESCC model using C57BL/6J mice treated with the chemical carcinogen 4- NQO and observed esophageal lesions at different time points. Second, we compared the antitumor efficacy of PD-1 antibody treatment in mice at the ESCC stage and PD-1 antibody preventive treatment in mice at the HGIN stage. The results showed that PD-1 antibody preventive treatment effectively impeded the progression of 4NQO-induced esophageal tumorigenesis. IHC analysis was performed to observe the infiltration of immune cells into the tumor microenvironment. It has been shown that active tissue-resident memory T cells can be induced and resided into the tumor microenvironment for a long period after treatment with PD-1 antibody. Reexposure to the oncogenic environment colonized by CD8+TRM cells can still exert antitumor effects. These results provide new strategies for the treatment of patients with early stage ESCC and HGIN. Prevention Relevance Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising results in multiple tumor species. However, there is currently no clinical application to evaluate their therapeutic value in cancer preventive treatment. Prophylactic use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the early stages of ESCC may provide long-term benefits to patients.

Objective: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is a first-line treatment for lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR-sensitive mutations, but acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs remains a problem in clinical practice. The development of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a critical mechanism that induces acquired resistance to TKIs. Reversing acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs through targeting the key molecules driving EMT provides an alternative choice for patients. We, therefore, aimed to explore the role of doublecortin-like kinase 1 (DCLK1) as an EMT driver gene in the acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinoma to EGFR-TKIs. Methods: The IC50 of Gefitinib or Osimertinib in PC9/HCC827 cells was measured using a cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) assay. The expression levels of EMT-related genes in PC9 and HCC827 cells were detected using RT-PCR and Western blot. Cell migration and invasion abilities were assessed via a transwell assay. For the in vivo experiments, PC9 cells were subcutaneously injected into BALB/c nude mice to form tumors. Upon harvesting, tumor tissues were retained for RT-PCR, Western blot, and polychromatic fluorescence staining to detect biomarker changes in the EMT process. Results: Gefitinib-resistant PC9 (PC9/GR) and Osimertinib-resistant HCC827 (HCC827/OR) cells showed remarkable activation of EMT and enhanced migration and invasion abilities compared to TKI-sensitive cells. In addition, DCLK1 expression was markedly increased in EGFR-TKI-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cells. The targeted knockout of DCLK1 effectively reversed the EMT phenotype in TKI-resistant cells and improved EGFR-TKI sensitivity, which was further validated by the in vivo experiments. Conclusions: DCLK1 facilitates acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI in lung adenocarcinoma by inducting EMT and accelerating the migration and invasion abilities of TKI-resistant cells.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has enhanced survival outcomes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of immunotherapy in ccRCC patients is restricted and we intended to develop and characterize an immune response prediction signature (IRPS) to forecast the efficacy of immunotherapy. Methods: RNA-seq expression profile and clinicopathologic characteristics of 539 kidney cancer and 72 patients with normal specimens, were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, while the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database was used as the validation set, which included 24 ccRCC samples. Utilization of the TCGA data and immune genes databases (ImmPort and the InnateDB), we explored through Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), along with Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator method (LASSO), and constructed an IRPS for kidney cancer patients. GSEA and CIBERSORT were performed to declare the molecular and immunologic mechanism underlying the predictive value of IRPS. The Human Protein Atlas (HPA) was deployed to verify the protein expressions of IRPS genes. Tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) score and immunophenoscore (IPS) were computed to determine the risk of immune escape and value the discrimination of IRPS. A ccRCC cohort with anti-PD-1 therapy was obtained as an external validation data set to verify the predictive value of IRPS. Results: We constructed a 10 gene signature related to the prognosis and immune response of ccRCC patients. Considering the IRPS risk score, patients were split into high and low risk groups. Patients with high risk in the TCGA cohort tended towards advanced tumor stage and grade with poor prognosis (p < 0.001), which was validated in GEO database (p = 0.004). High-risk group tumors were related with lower PD-L1 expression, higher TMB, higher MSIsensor score, lower IPS, higher TIDE score, and enriched Treg cells, which might be the potential mechanism of immune dysfunction and exclusion. Patients in the IRPS low risk group had better PFS (HR:0.73; 95% CI: 0.54-1.0; P = 0.047). Conclusion: A novel biomarker of IRPS was constructed to predict the benefit of immunotherapy, which might lead to more individualized prognoses and tailored therapy for kidney cancer patients.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) exhibits the poorest outcomes among breast cancer subtypes due to the high heterogeneity and a lasting scarcity of effectual treatments. Targeted therapies based on molecular subtypes of TNBC are critical step toward tailoring treatments to improve clinical outcomes. Gastrointestinal cancer stem cell (CSC) marker DCLK1 was reported to be highly expressed in stem cell-rich subtype of TNBC. Here, we firstly explored the impacts of DCLK1 on tumor cells as well as their immune microenvironment in TNBC and potential therapeutic strategies for TNBC patients with high DCLK1 expression. Our results disclosed that DCLK1 overexpression promoted, while knockout of DCLK1 suppressed the CSC-like traits of TNBC cells and resistance to chemotherapeutics. Besides, DCLK1 supported immune escape by inhibiting intratumoral cytotoxic T cell infiltration in TNBC and hence limited immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy. Mechanistically, bioinformatics analysis revealed that IL-6/STAT3 signaling was significantly enriched in high DCLK1-expressing patients, and our results further revealed that DCLK1 enhanced IL-6 expression and STAT3 activation in TNBC cells, which finally gave rise to upregulated CSC traits and suppressed CD8+ T-cell activity. Inhibiting IL-6/STAT3 pathway by IL-6R antagonist, Tocilizumab or STAT3 inhibitor, S31-201 could abolish DCLK1-promoted malignant phenotypes of TNBC cells. Finally, DCLK1 was identified to be specifically and highly expressed in the mesenchymal-like subtype of TNBC and targeting DCLK1 could improve chemotherapy efficacy and activate antitumor immunity. Overall, our study revealed the potential clinical benefits of targeting DCLK1 in TNBC treatment. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-023-01642-3.

Introduction: In CameL phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03134872), addition of camrelizumab to first-line chemotherapy significantly improved the progression-free survival in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-squamous NSCLC. Here, we present outcomes after a minimum follow-up of 43.9 months since last patient randomization. Methods: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to 4-6 cycles of camrelizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed or chemotherapy alone every 3 weeks, followed by maintenance camrelizumab plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed only (n=205 and 207, respectively). Total camrelizumab exposure was up to 2 years. Results: As of January 31, 2022, camrelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited substantially improved overall survival over chemotherapy alone (median, 27.1 versus 19.8 mo; hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57-0.92]). In the chemotherapy alone group, 95 (45.9%) patients crossed over to camrelizumab monotherapy. After adjustment for crossover, the survival benefit with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy was more pronounced (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.42-0.71]). In camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group, 33 patients completed 2 years of camrelizumab. Objective response rate was 97.0%, with ongoing responses in 17 of the 32 responses (53.1%); and 93.9% (31/33) of patients were alive at data cutoff. Safety profiles were consistent with the previous report, and no obvious evidence of cumulative toxicity was found with long exposure to camrelizumab. Conclusions: Camrelizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed provides long-term survival benefit over chemotherapy, with manageable toxicity, as well as remarkable and durable response in patients receiving 2 years of camrelizumab, further supporting camrelizumab combination as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Background: Treatment options for Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) after failure of first-line chemotherapy are limited. This study (ORIENT-3) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab versus docetaxel as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC. Methods: ORIENT-3 was an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled phase 3 trial that recruited patients with stage IIIB/IIIC/IV sqNSCLC after failure with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 200 mg of sintilimab or 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously every 3 weeks, stratified by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the full analysis set (FAS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and safety. Results: Between August 25, 2017, and November 7, 2018, 290 patients were randomized. For FAS, 10 patients from the docetaxel arm were excluded. The median OS was 11.79 (n = 145; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.28-15.57) months with sintilimab versus 8.25 (n = 135; 95% CI, 6.47-9.82) months with docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.025). Sintilimab treatment significantly prolonged PFS (median 4.30 vs. 2.79 months; HR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.68; P < 0.001) and showed higher ORR (25.50% vs. 2.20%, P < 0.001) and DCR (65.50% vs. 37.80%, P < 0.001) than the docetaxel arm. The median DoR was 12.45 (95% CI, 4.86-25.33) months in the sintilimab arm and 4.14 (95% CI, 1.41-7.23) months in the docetaxel arm (P = 0.045). Treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were reported in 26 (18.1%) patients in the sintilimab arm and 47 (36.2%) patients in the docetaxel arm. Exploratory biomarker analysis showed potential predictive values of expression levels of two transcription factors, including OVOL2 (HR: 0.35; P < 0.001) and CTCF (HR: 3.50; P < 0.001)，for sintilimab treatment. Conclusions: Compared with docetaxel, sintilimab significantly improved the OS, PFS, and ORR of Chinese patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC.

ERBB2 amplification is one of the most important and mature targets for HER2-targeted drug therapy. Somatic mutations of ERBB2 in the tyrosine kinase domain have been studied extensively, and play a role in response to anti-HER2 therapy among different cancer types. However, ERBB2 fusion has not been got attention and its relevance to HER2-targeted therapy is unclear. We comprehensively characterized ERBB2 fusions from next-generation sequencing (NGS) data between May 2018 and October 2021 in 32,131 various solid tumors. Among the tumors, 0.28% harbored ERBB2 fusions, which occurred more commonly in gastroesophageal junction cancer (3.12%; 3/96), breast cancer (1.89%; 8/422), urothelial carcinoma (1.72%; 1/58), and gastric cancer (1.60%; 23/1,437). Our population presented with a median age of 65 years (range 28 to 88 years), a high proportion of men (55 men vs 34 women; 61.80%). Among the patients with ERBB2 fusions, TP53 (82%), APC (18%), and CDK4 (15%) were the top3 co-mutant genes. What’s more, most patients with ERBB2 fusion also had ERBB2 amplification (75.28%; 67/89), which was similar to the data in the TCGA database (88.00%; 44/50). Furthermore, TCGA database shows that patients with ERBB2 fusions in pan-cancer had a worse prognosis than those without ERBB2 fusions, as well as in breast cancer. Besides, ERBB2 amplification combined with ERBB2 fusion had worse prognosis than those with only ERBB2 amplification. ERBB2 fusion may interfere the effect of anti-HER2-targeted antibody drugs and influence the prognosis of patients with ERBB2 amplification. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to confirm the results in the future.