Ena Niño de Guzman Quispe's research while affiliated with Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre and other places

What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (2)

More work needed on decision analysis for shared decision-making: A scoping review
Article
  • Oct 2021
Objective: To explore and characterize published evidence on the ways decision analysis has been used to inform shared decision-making. Study design and setting: For this scoping review, we searched five bibliographic databases (from inception until February 2021), reference lists of included studies, trial registries, a thesis database and webs...
Cite
Request full-text
Fig. 2 The process of self-management (SM) and the experience with SM...
Outcomes and modifiable factors of self-management interventions
The Perspectives of Patients with Chronic Diseases and Their Caregivers on Self-Management Interventions: A Scoping Review of Reviews
Article
Full-text available
  • Apr 2021
Background Self-management (SM) interventions are supportive interventions systematically provided by healthcare professionals, peers, or laypersons to increase the skills and confidence of patients in their ability to manage chronic diseases. We had two objectives: (1) to summarise the preferences and experiences of patients and their caregivers (...
Cite
Download full-text

Citations

... The international collaborative group DASH-TOP (Decision Analysis Shared decision-making Thromboprophylasis Of Pregancy) [12], is developing a SDM intervention to support women and their clinicians in making decisions about the best strategy to prevent recurrent VTE during pregnancy. This SDM intervention contains three components: 1) evidence-based information about the risks and benefits of taking LMWH to prevent VTE; 2) values elicitation exercises to explore women's preferences for each of the four health states relevant to this decision (i) inconvenience of using LMWH during pregnancy; (ii) major obstetrical bleed; (iii) Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) in pregnancy; and (iv) Pulmonary Embolism (PE) in pregnancy; and 3) a decision analysis (DA) model that presents which alternative has better expected value (i.e., quality-adjusted life year (QALY)) considering individualized data on the patient's risks and preferences toward different health states [13]. These components have been used successfully to support SDM resulting in improvements in the quality of the decisionmaking process [10,14,15]. ...
Reference: Assessment of a venous thromboembolism prophylaxis shared decision-making intervention (DASH-TOP) using the decisional conflict scale: a mixed-method study
View
... To inform the recommendations, the COMPAR-EU consortium partners conducted a systematic review (SR) with standard pairwise meta-analyses, NMA, and cNMA to assess SMIs effectiveness, a cost-effectiveness analysis, a scoping review and an overview [29,30] to inform about patients values and preferences, and a contextual analysis to inform about acceptability, feasibility, and other implementation considerations [21]. ...
Reference: COMPAR-EU Recommendations on Self-Management Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
View full-text