Dominique Roddier's research while affiliated with PRINCIPLE POWER and other places
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
This paper investigates the techno-economic feasibility of integrating a desalination system to an offshore wind farm.
The first part of the paper involves a proposal for the design of a desalination system fitted inside the WindFloat Atlantic hull. Taking into account of the power, footprint, volume and weight requirements of the desalination system, the desalination capacity is chosen to be 10,000 m3/d per platform2. A 3D model of the system is also presented.
The second part of the paper focuses on the development of an economic model that gives as output the levelized cost of water (LCOW) for the studied technology. At first, a methodology to estimate capital expenditure (Capex) and operational expenditure (Opex) of an offshore desalination system with the above-mentioned characteristics is presented. Then, three locations with high wind speeds and with frequent exposure to droughts (Gran Canaria, California and South Africa) are chosen and the model is applied. Particularly interesting results are found for Gran Canaria, isolated system with favorable conditions (high electricity price, high water production cost and good offshore wind resource).
The state of California stands at a crossroads where many different enablers are now coming together to spur its leadership in a new offshore wind energy industry off the west coast of the US. This paper presents the rationale for this new industry to be built from the ground up and elaborates on the development efforts recently undertaken by Principle Power Inc. (PPI) to jumpstart this important opportunity. The paper will first focus on the unique value proposition offshore wind offers to the Golden State and discuss the path the company has taken to accelerate the development of the offshore wind industry along the coast, with the proposition of a flagship project in Humboldt County.
It is now widely accepted that, due to significant economies of scale, the levelized cost of energy in offshore wind industry decreases as the turbine size and rated power increases. For offshore wind turbines, fixed and floating foundations can be quite complimentary when sites span a large water depth range. This paper presents the new WindFloat semisubmersible design supporting a 10MW generic wind turbine made by DTU [1]. This study evaluates the initial global performance of the WindFloat 10MW hull. In addition, RAO and frequency domain accelerations at the nacelle are presented. A comparison of the OpenFAST model, that we plan to use in all the future analysis, will be conducted against the benchmarked OrcaFAST model used by PPI and validated against the WindFloat prototype [2].
The WindFloat prototype is a semisubmersible type foundation supporting a 2 MW, 3 bladed, horizontal axis Vestas V-80 turbine. The 8-year project is near its completion. After 3 years of planning, engineering and fabrication, the prototype was installed in 2011 in the northern Portugal Atlantic waters. Following 5 years of operations and electricity production, the unit was decommissioned in the summer of 2016. This paper retraces the prototype project going back to the early objectives, focusing on its 5-year performance and lessons learned. The overall assessment of the impact of the prototype on the incoming pre-commercial projects is discussed. Some emphasis is placed on both the decommissioning of the unit and the economics of the project, as these have not yet been published.
In this chapter, a review of some of the prototype FOWT devices that have been deployed to-date is presented. The technologies overviewed throughout the chapter are: Principle Power’s semisubmersible WindFloat device; the Hywind spar under development by Statoil; the Goto Island project in Japan and the SWAY system.
The flow-induced vibration fatigue of an array of tubes is a complex problem of practical significance in the offshore oil and gas industry. Simple analytical tools for analyzing isolated tubes lack the capability of directly addressing the array problem, so they require some sort of calibration if they are to be used for this application. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and coupled computational fluid-structure interaction programs can also be utilized to address the problem in more detail, but at a significant cost in computing time. In either case, understanding of the phenomena is limited, and relatively little relevant data are available to verify the accuracy of these programs for this application. This paper documents a physical model test performed at the University of California-Berkeley Richmond Field Station Tow Basin with the following objectives: to improve confidence in the understanding of the dynamic performance and fatigue demand on both bare and straked tubes in an arrayed configuration; to estimate the influence of an external super-structure (e.g., the truss section of a floating truss spar platform) on the vibrations of the tubes in the array; and, to generate data for verification or calibration of state-of-the-art or emerging analysis tools. The findings provide new, useful information on both the fatigue of tubes in complex configurations and the effectiveness of suppression devices in these scenarios for fatigue mitigation.
The installation of an offshore platform on the Outer Continental Shelf of the United States, whether for oil extraction or to support a renewable energy device, is regulated by U.S. federal and state legislations. The WindFloat Pacific Project, a US Department of Energy (DOE)-funded project which intends to install at least three floating wind turbines (FWTs) off of the US Pacific coast, needs to follow acceptable standards of design, construction and operation to obtain its permits and move forward. However, due to the novelty of FWTs such as the WindFloat, there is no explicit guidance as to which standards apply to various aspects of the project. The simple answer would be to follow guidelines for similar platforms, such as the units engaged in offshore oil and gas exploration and production. However, after the reorganization of the Minerals Management Service (MMS) in 2010, the oversight of the use of the Outer Continental Shelf was split between Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) for renewable offshore energy and Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) for petroleum activities. Additionally, oil production and drilling platforms are manned structures, which also fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Coast Guard. WindFloats, like most offshore renewable energy structures, are unmanned, thus requiring entirely different approaches to platform access, personnel and platform safety. Additionally, for not handling hydrocarbons or other hazardours chemicals and substances, FWTs present signifcantly less risk to the environment in terms of marine pollution.
WindFloats are steel structures of semi-submersible type supporting a wind turbine and tower, and are stationary units permanently moored to the seabed through chains and anchors. They are installed in a farm setting. In a commercial scale project, wind farms may consist of 50 identical structures installed within a pre-defined zone. In contrast, oil and gas platforms often operate individually and are custom built for the location and type of operation. As such, not all standards and requirements applied to offshore oil and gas facilities would directly apply to FWTs. Since the regulations do not cover all technical aspects, an alternative suite of standards and requirements must be defined to address the specific characteristics and risk profile of these units.
To achieve that, existing national and international standards, as well as class guidelines, are reviewed and applicable sections are identified. This work is performed in cooperation with BOEM, representatives of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), BSEE, the classification society and proposed Certified Verification Agent for the WindFloats, American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) and representatives from the Wind and Water Program of the DOE.
This paper will identify those areas where alternative standards are needed for review by regulatory agencies, due to the specific function of the FWT. It will also present the alternate regulatory compliance process to be applied for the acceptance of these standards and the definition of the compliance scheme.
The offshore wind energy industry at its current development stage is relatively limited by water depth and soil constraints. This chapter concentrates on the new frontier of the off-shore wind power industry, the deep-water areas, where the water depth exceeds 50-60 m. The transition of the offshore wind power from shallow water to deep-water sites will be assessed as a potential significant part of our future energy mix. Peripheral constraints that affect the siting of floating wind turbines will be examined, including social, environmental, and practical considerations. Then, the chapter presents an overview of the current state of the art in the offshore wind energy and defines the numerous technical and engineering challenges associated with these innovative floating wind turbine designs. Finally, the various generic types of technologies currently under development will be described and the cutting edge of nascent floating wind energy technologies will be discussed.
... Many efforts have been performed by scholars of Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) on 10-MW wind turbines, they designed many foundations to support the DTU 10-MW reference wind turbines (RWT), including bottom-fixed foundations, semi-submersible type floater [20,21], TLP type floater [22,23], spar type floater [24][25][26]. Son et al. [27] designed a new WindFloat type semi-submersible platform to support the DTU 10-MW wind turbine. The OpenFAST and OrcaFAST are used to predict the performance of the WindFloat, and the numerical results show that the platform has an excellent hydrodynamic performance. ...
... However, economic feasibility has yet to be proven for offshore solar sectors. For instance, the weight of the OC4 wind platform is 13, 473 tons for a 5 MW wind turbine (Roddier et al., 2017). If used for PVs, its deck area (900 m 2 ) will only accommodate solar panels with a maximum capacity of 130 kW. ...
... The wind regime influences how crews can operate, thus influencing their activities, and brings additional loads to offshore structures that cannot be neglected at all. [40]In order to be able to analyze the dynamic behavior of an offshore structure, we need to know the hydro-meteorological conditions in the area where the offshore vessel or structure operates, because the forces and moments induced ...
... VIV responses of cylinder arrays were studied and compared with those of an isolated cylinder by several researchers. Some studies found that the downstream cylinders had smaller CF responses than those of an isolated cylinder (Tognarelli et al., 2016); on the contrary, others found that the downstream cylinders had larger CF responses than those of an isolated cylinder (Joshi et al., 2016;Wang et al., 2018). The present study observed both. ...
... The installation site has a depth of 49 m [35]. The operation of the Windfloat platform has generated fundamental information to analyze its dynamics and improve the design and construction of semisubmersible platforms [36]. ...
... The design of the moorings for FOWTs can follow the same standard as for the moorings of offshore oil & gas facilities with two main exceptions [20]. First, an offshore oil & gas platform is usually a manned facility, while a FOWT is un-manned. ...
... The experiments completed in this study were conducted in a chemically waterproofed, expanded polystyrene foam tank of water, seen in Figure 3, with a testing area of 1 m in diameter and 0.4 m deep. This translates to a full-scale (considering a scale of 1:150) water depth of 60 m, which could be considered "deep-water" in different offshore applications [47]. The water tank also included a 9.5 • , or 1:6, slanted edge along the full diameter of the tank (1.7 m) to reduce wave reflections. ...
... As mentioned in Section I, OWFs are complex cyberphysical systems with human interaction. As such OWFs exhibit all the basic traits common of critical infrastructures [20], [21]: ...
... The asymmetric roll response as suggested by experiments was captured in their numerical analysis. Seah et al. [7] performed the simulation in time domain, using the improved formulation of Morrison drag coefficient characterized by the Keulegan-Carpenter number (KC). The KC-dependent drag coefficient was also implemented by Bigot et al. [8] in the frequency domain simulation, and results comparison indicated that the constant drag coefficient is already performing very well. ...
... The fixed wind farm was located at 34 m depth 50 km from the shore in the North Atlantic (USA), and the floating wind farm was located at 739 m depth 36 km from Table 3 Platform designs in operation at farm-scale, with current parameter values (not including maximum possible turbine capacity rating, other material options, and water depth limits). [4,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] the shore in the Pacific (USA) using a semi-sub platform. The LCOE for the floating project was 132 $/MWh (∼121 e/MWh), compared to 85 $/MWh (∼78 e/MWh) for the fixed project. ...