Chuanxi Lai's research while affiliated with Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital and other places

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (3)


(A) Schematic structure of exportin‐1 (XPO1). Boxes 1−20 represent the HEAT repeat motifs. The CRIME domain (XPO1, importin β, etc.), which corresponds to HEAT repeats 1−3, shares homology with importin β and helps recognise RanGTP. H11‐12 and H13‐14 have two NES epitopes that can bind NES cargoes. However, Cys528 is modified by leptomycin B (LMB) and targets the central region of the XPO1 NES‐binding cleft. Moreover, a mutation hotspot (E571K) plays a role in oncogenic processes. (B) Schematic diagram of the physiological activities of XPO1. In terms of nuclear‐cytoplasmic transport, XPO1 and RanGDP undergo nuclear‐cytoplasmic transport via Ran guanine exchange factor (RanGEP), where they form XPO1‐RanGTP and further bind to cargo proteins. The substances involved in this translocation are generally proteins and RNAs, and the proteins can include tumour suppressors, cell cycle‐related proteins and oncogenes. When cargo is transported to the cytoplasm, the XPO1‐RanGTP complex and cargo are redissolved into XPO1, RanGDP and cargo (protein or RNA) with the help of GTPase‐activating protein (RanGAP) and RanGTP‐binding protein 1/2 (RanBP1/2). Among these components, XPO1 re‐enters the nucleus.³⁶ (C) Schematic diagram of XPO1‐mediated RNAs nuclear export.
The mechanism of XPO1 in normal and malignant cells. In normal cells, XPO1 maintains normal nuclear export, while in tumour cells, increased XPO1 expression promotes nuclear export leading to a large number of mislocated proteins and RNAs in the cytoplasm. Inhibition of XPO1 induced nuclear accumulation of tumour suppressors, oncogenes and RNAs.
Roles of XPO1 in drug resistance. Cargo protein modification, XPO1 mutation or increased XPO1 expression promote nuclear export and induce tumour resistance.
Structures of XPO1 inhibitors.
Schematic diagram of response biomarkers of selective inhibitor of nuclear exports (SINEs) in tumour therapy.
The nuclear export protein exportin‐1 in solid malignant tumours: From biology to clinical trials
  • Literature Review
  • Full-text available

May 2024

·

18 Reads

Clinical and Translational Medicine

Clinical and Translational Medicine

Chuanxi Lai

·

Lingna Xu

·

Sheng Dai

Background Exportin‐1 (XPO1), a crucial protein regulating nuclear‐cytoplasmic transport, is frequently overexpressed in various cancers, driving tumor progression and drug resistance. This makes XPO1 an attractive therapeutic target. Over the past few decades, the number of available nuclear export‐selective inhibitors has been increasing. Only KPT‐330 (selinexor) has been successfully used for treating haematological malignancies, and KPT‐8602 (eltanexor) has been used for treating haematologic tumours in clinical trials. However, the use of nuclear export‐selective inhibitors for the inhibition of XPO1 expression has yet to be thoroughly investigated in clinical studies and therapeutic outcomes for solid tumours. Methods We collected numerous literatures to explain the efficacy of XPO1 Inhibitors in preclinical and clinical studies of a wide range of solid tumours. Results In this review, we focus on the nuclear export function of XPO1 and results from clinical trials of its inhibitors in solid malignant tumours. We summarized the mechanism of action and therapeutic potential of XPO1 inhibitors, as well as adverse effects and response biomarkers. Conclusion XPO1 inhibition has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy in the fight against cancer, offering a novel approach to targeting tumorigenic processes and overcoming drug resistance. SINE compounds have demonstrated efficacy in a wide range of solid tumours, and ongoing research is focused on optimizing their use, identifying response biomarkers, and developing effective combination therapies. Key Points Exportin‐1 (XPO1) plays a critical role in mediating nucleocytoplasmic transport and cell cycle. XPO1 dysfunction promotes tumourigenesis and drug resistance within solid tumours. The therapeutic potential and ongoing researches on XPO1 inhibitors in the treatment of solid tumours. Additional researches are essential to address safety concerns and identify biomarkers for predicting patient response to XPO1 inhibitors.

Download
Share


Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant preoperative short-course radiation followed by envafolimab plus CAPEOX in microsatellite stable (MSS)/mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) locally advanced rectal cancer.

February 2023

·

20 Reads

·

5 Citations

Journal of Clinical Oncology

134 Background: Chemoradiation is the standard neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Microsatellite stable (MSS)/ mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) rectal cancer rarely responds to immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, but combination with chemoradiation may improve sensitivity of MSS/pMMR tumors by inducing immune-stimulatory effects. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of patients treated with neoadjuvant preoperative short-course radiation followed by envafolimab plus CAPEOX for MSS/pMMR locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: This is an open-label, single-center, phase ¢ò study. Patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma with MSS/pMMR were eligible. MMR protein expression was tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) £¬and MSI status was confirmed by NGS (next generation sequencing). All pts included in this study underwent neoadjuvant short-course radiation (total dose of 5¡Á5Gy) in the first week after enrollment, then followed by 6 cycles of envafolimab (anti-PD-L1 inhibitor,150mg, d1, subcutaneous injection, QW) plus 2 cycles of CAPEOX in the next six weeks, and subsequently underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) in the ninth week. The primary endpoint is pathological complete response rate. Secondary endpoints include tumor regression grade (TRG), 3 year disease free survival, overall survival, toxicity, and quality of life (QoL). Results: This study intends to recruit 32 pts, and a total of 21 pts were enrolled from January 2022 to September 2022. Overall median age was 67 (42-79) years. 12 pts completed study designed treatment protocol (envafolimab plus CAPOX) followed with TME procedures, and 9 pts are still undergoing neoadjuvant treatment. All 12 pts achieved major partial response (MPR) evaluated by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), and 8 pts (8/12,76.6%) achieved pCR. During neoadjuvant treatment period, 20 pts (20/21, 95.2%) presented with treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) of any grade, 18 pts (18/21, 85.7%) had grade 1-2 and one each pts had grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (2/21, 9.5%). The most common TRAEs were sensation of rectal tenesmus. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant preoperative short-course radiation followed by envafolimab plus CAPEOX in MSS/pMMR locally advanced rectal cancer achieved a promising pathologic response. Meanwhile, this combination neoadjuvant therapy is safe and worthy of application to clinical practice. (Funded by Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine.) Clinical trial information: NCT05216653 .

Citations (1)


... Most trials (n ¼ 7) scheduled ICB after radiotherapy. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Four prescribed immunotherapy during the radiation treatment, [34][35][36][37] one prescribed it before, [38] and one included two arms that would incorporate it either before or after radiotherapy. [39] The sections below aim to offer an overview of the studies that have yielded results on the effects of combination ICB and radiotherapy in RC. ...

Reference:

A Review of Scheduling Strategies for Radiotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant preoperative short-course radiation followed by envafolimab plus CAPEOX in microsatellite stable (MSS)/mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) locally advanced rectal cancer.
  • Citing Article
  • February 2023

Journal of Clinical Oncology