Chirag R. Parikh's research while affiliated with Johns Hopkins University and other places

Importance Recipient outcomes after kidney transplant from deceased donors who received dialysis prior to kidney donation are not well described. Objective To compare outcomes of transplant recipients who received kidneys from deceased donors who underwent dialysis prior to kidney donation vs recipients of kidneys from deceased donors who did not undergo dialysis. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective cohort study was conducted including data from 58 US organ procurement organizations on deceased kidney donors and kidney transplant recipients. From 2010 to 2018, 805 donors who underwent dialysis prior to kidney donation were identified. The donors who underwent dialysis prior to kidney donation were matched 1:1 with donors who did not undergo dialysis using a rank-based distance matrix algorithm; 1944 kidney transplant recipients were evaluated. Exposure Kidney transplants from deceased donors who underwent dialysis prior to kidney donation compared with kidney transplants from deceased donors who did not undergo dialysis. Main Outcomes and Measures The 4 study outcomes were delayed graft function (defined as receipt of dialysis by the kidney recipient ≤1 week after transplant), all-cause graft failure, death-censored graft failure, and death. Results From 2010 to 2018, 1.4% of deceased kidney donors (805 of 58 155) underwent dialysis prior to kidney donation. Of these 805 individuals, 523 (65%) donated at least 1 kidney. A total of 969 kidneys (60%) were transplanted and 641 kidneys (40%) were discarded. Among the donors with kidneys transplanted, 514 (mean age, 33 years [SD, 10.8 years]; 98 had hypertension [19.1%] and 36 had diabetes [7%]) underwent dialysis prior to donation and were matched with 514 (mean age, 33 years [SD, 10.9 years]; 98 had hypertension [19.1%] and 36 had diabetes [7%]) who did not undergo dialysis. Kidney transplants from donors who received dialysis prior to donation (n = 954 kidney recipients) were associated with a higher risk of delayed graft function compared with kidney transplants from donors who did not receive dialysis (n = 990 kidney recipients) (59.2% vs 24.6%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 4.17 [95% CI, 3.28-5.29]). The incidence rates did not significantly differ at a median follow-up of 34.1 months for all-cause graft failure (43.1 kidney transplants per 1000 person-years from donors who received dialysis prior to donation vs 46.9 kidney transplants per 1000 person-years from donors who did not receive dialysis; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.70-1.15]), for death-censored graft failure (22.5 vs 20.6 per 1000 person-years, respectively; adjusted HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.83-1.69]), or for death (24.6 vs 30.8 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.55-1.04]). Conclusions and Relevance Compared with receiving a kidney from a deceased donor who did not undergo dialysis, receiving a kidney from a deceased donor who underwent dialysis prior to kidney donation was associated with a significantly higher incidence of delayed graft function, but no significant difference in graft failure or death at follow-up.

Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is a worldwide public health problem, causing considerable morbidity and mortality. Patients with SLD are at increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Conversely, patients with cardiometabolic conditions have a high prevalence of SLD. In addition to epidemiological evidence linking many of these conditions, there is evidence of shared pathophysiological processes. In December 2022, a unique multi-stakeholder, multi-specialty meeting, called MOSAIC (Metabolic multi Organ Science Accelerating Innovation in Clinical Trials) was convened to foster collaboration across metabolic, hepatology, nephrology and CV disorders. One of the goals of the meeting was to consider approaches to drug development that would speed regulatory approval of treatments for multiple disorders by combining liver and cardiorenal endpoints within a single study. Non-invasive tests, including biomarkers and imaging, are needed in hepatic and cardiorenal trials. They can be used as trial endpoints, to enrich trial populations, to diagnose and risk stratify patients and to assess treatment efficacy and safety. Although they are used in proof of concept and phase 2 trials, they are often not acceptable for regulatory approval of therapies. The challenge is defining the optimal combination of biomarkers, imaging and morbidity/mortality outcomes and ensuring that they are included in future trials while minimizing the burden on patients, trialists and trial sponsors. This paper provides an overview of some of the wide array of CV, liver and kidney measurements that were discussed at the MOSAIC meeting.

Background Cognitive dysfunction is a well-known complication of chronic kidney disease, but it is less known whether cognitive decline occurs in survivors after acute kidney injury (AKI). We hypothesized that an episode of AKI is associated with poorer cognitive function, mediated, at least in part, by persistent systemic inflammation. Methods ASSESS-AKI enrolled patients surviving three months after hospitalization with and without AKI matched based on demographics, comorbidities, and baseline kidney function. A subset underwent cognitive testing using the modified mini-mental status examination (3MS) at 3, 12, and 36 months. We examined the association of AKI with 3MS scores using mixed linear models and assessed the proportion of risk mediated by systemic inflammatory biomarkers. Results Among 1538 participants in ASSESS-AKI, 1420 (92%) completed the 3MS assessment at 3 months and had a corresponding matched participant. Participants with AKI had lower 3MS scores at three years (difference -1.1 (95% CI: -2.0, -0.3) P=0.009 ) compared to participants without AKI. A higher proportion of AKI participants had a clinically meaningful (≥ 5 point) reduction in 3MS scores at three years compared to participants without AKI (14% vs. 10%, P=0.04 ). In mediation analyses, plasma soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (sTNFR-1) at three months after AKI mediated 35% ( P=0.02 ) of the AKI related risk for 3MS scores at three years. Conclusions AKI was associated with lower 3MS scores and sTNFR-1 concentrations appeared to mediate a significant proportion of the risk of long-term cognitive impairment. Further work is needed to determine if AKI is causal or a marker for cognitive impairment.

Serum creatinine levels are insensitive to real-time changes in kidney function or injury. There is a growing interest in assessing kidney injury by measuring biomarkers in body fluid. From our previous studies, we identified and reported three urinary biomarkers namely Uromodulin (UMOD), Osteopontin (OPN), and Interleukin-9 (IL-9) to be associated with kidney health. The availability of a rapid point-of-care test for these urinary biomarkers will potentially accelerate its applicability and accessibility. In this study, we aimed to develop novel lateral flow device (LFD) for UMOD, OPN and IL-9. We tested paired antibodies using Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay wherein we observed functionality only for UMOD and OPN and not for IL-9. A conjugation buffer pH of 7.8 and 8.5 was found suitable at a detection antibody concentration of 15 µg/mL for LFD development. The developed LFDs were found to quantitatively measure UMOD standard (LLOD of 80,000 pg/mL) and OPN standard (LLOD of 8600 pg/mL) respectively. The LFD was also able to measure human urinary UMOD and OPN with a percent CV of 12.12 and 5.23 respectively.

Rationale & Objective Tubulointerstitial damage is a feature of early chronic kidney disease (CKD), but current clinical tests capture it poorly. Urine biomarkers of tubulointerstitial health may identify risk of CKD. Study Design Prospective cohort (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities [ARIC]) and case-cohort (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [MESA] and Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke [REGARDS]). Setting & Participants Adults with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m² and without diabetes in the ARIC, REGARDS, and MESA studies. Exposures Baseline urine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), alpha-1-microglobulin (α1m), kidney injury molecule-1, epidermal growth factor, and chitinase-3-like protein 1. Outcome Incident CKD or end-stage kidney disease. Analytical Approach Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression for each cohort; meta-analysis of results from all 3 cohorts. Results 872 ARIC participants (444 cases of incident CKD), 636 MESA participants (158 cases), and 924 REGARDS participants (488 cases) were sampled. Across cohorts, mean age ranged from 60 ± 10 to 63 ± 8 years, and baseline eGFR ranged from 88 ± 13 to 91 ± 14 mL/min/1.73 m². In ARIC, higher concentrations of urine MCP-1, α1m, and kidney injury molecule-1 were associated with incident CKD. In MESA, higher concentration of urine MCP-1 and lower concentration of epidermal growth factor were each associated with incident CKD. In REGARDS, none of the biomarkers were associated with incident CKD. In meta-analysis of all 3 cohorts, each 2-fold increase α1m concentration was associated with incident CKD (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08-1.31). Limitations Observational design susceptible to confounding; competing risks during long follow-up period; meta-analysis limited to 3 cohorts. Conclusions In 3 combined cohorts of adults without prevalent CKD or diabetes, higher urine α1m concentration was independently associated with incident CKD. 4 biomarkers were associated with incident CKD in at least 1 of the cohorts when analyzed individually. Kidney tubule health markers might inform CKD risk independent of eGFR and albuminuria.