Brockton Chandler Feltman's research while affiliated with Michigan State University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Wild game processors’ perceptions of chronic wasting disease risks in Michigan
  • Article

October 2023

·

21 Reads

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Brockton Feltman

·

Alexa R. Warwick

·

Garrett Knowlton

·

[...]

·

Distin Isenhoff
Share

Fig. 1. Study Region: Kansas portion of the High Plains Aquifer (HPA). Left to Right: High Plains States of the United States with Kansas outlined in red. Approximate farm locations within the study region are colored by total aquifer drawdown from 1996 to 2016 (Haacker et al., 2016). Values were found by subtracting interpolated water levels in 1996 from those in 2016. Yellow indicates no drawdown over this period, and red indicates severe drawdown. The Localized Enhanced Management Area (LEMA) and control areas discussed below are outlined in black and blue respectively. Counties in the High Plains region are drawn in gray.
Fig. 2. Water extraction for irrigation relative to the year of LEPA adoption. Mean and median total groundwater water pumped per farm across the Kansas HPA from ten years prior to ten years post LEMA adoption. The red dashed line indicates the year of LEPA adoption, gray shaded regions indicate 95 % confidence intervals around linear fits. Data obtained from WIMAS.
Fig. 3. Fraction of irrigated farm area before and after LEPA adoption. Mean and median fractions of total irrigated farm area from ten years prior to ten years post LEMA adoption. The red dashed line indicates the year of LEPA adoption, gray shaded regions indicate 95 % confidence interval around linear fits. Irrigated area is obtained from the AIM remote sensing dataset while adoption year is computed from WIMAS.
Fig. 4. Per farm saturated thickness relative to LEPA adoption. Change in saturated thickness from ten years prior to ten years post LEPA adoption, summarized per farm using annual groundwater maps (Haacker et al., 2016). The red dashed line indicates the year of LEPA adoption, gray shaded regions indicate 99 % confidence interval around linear fit.
Fig. 5. Average amount of water used for irrigation by farm over time inside the LEMA and control areas. The red vertical line represents the year LEMA was enacted. Data were obtained from WIMAS.
Sustainable irrigation through local collaborative governance: Evidence for a structural fix in Kansas
  • Article
  • Full-text available

October 2021

·

252 Reads

·

12 Citations

Environmental Science & Policy

Sustainable water management is increasingly essential on local to global scales, especially in regions where water scarcity is causing immediate environmental, social, and economic harm. While academics and politicians agree on the need to reduce pressure on critical water resources, the path toward that goal is not clear. Here, we present an interdisciplinary evaluation of two distinct policy approaches toward water conservation to determine whether they reduced the depletion rate of the High Plains Aquifer in the Central United States. Several studies have demonstrated, and our findings support, that subsidizing the purchase of more efficient irrigation technology failed to reduce water consumption. However, a structural approach in which state-facilitated, but locally-derived, limits were placed on water consumption did successfully reduce groundwater extraction with the support of local agricultural producers. We analyze these results using a political, sociological, and economic theoretical framework and conclude that to build upon the success of this collaborative governance model, states should seek to replicate localized groups rather than expanding management boundaries to incorporate larger geographic areas.

Download

Citations (1)


... However, unexpected shifts in stakeholder's response to changing conditions can have profound effects on irrigation water use. A stakeholder-driven water conservation initiative in the state of Kansas reduced water use by 31% over a 5 year period 56 and lead to a reduction in overall groundwater withdrawals 57 . Considering these recent successes, future work could critically examine the long-term effects of groundwater conservation initiatives coupled with deficit irrigation under future climates on agricultural productivity and water resource sustainability. ...

Reference:

Irrigation benefits outweigh costs in more US croplands by mid-century
Sustainable irrigation through local collaborative governance: Evidence for a structural fix in Kansas

Environmental Science & Policy