Ben A. Parslow's research while affiliated with University of Adelaide and other places

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (4)


Collection locality maps of the examined Hylaeus species. The Fijian Hylaeus—Hylaeus albaeus sp. nov. (A), H. apertus sp. nov. (B), H. derectus sp. nov. (C), H. navai sp. nov. (D), H. veli sp. nov. (E), and H. breviflavus sp. nov. (F)—are surrounded by green, the French Polynesian species—H. aureaviridis sp. nov. (G) and H. tuamotuensis (H)—are surrounded by purple, and the Micronesian species—H. chuukensis sp. nov. (I)—is surrounded by salmon. The inset (J) shows the entire study area. Asterisks, and gray and red points (A, F, H) indicate that at least some coordinates are georeferenced from general localities.
The phylogeny of the Micronesian (salmon), Fijian (green), and French Polynesian (purple) Hylaeus. The outgroup (gray) contains three Australian Hylaeinae from different genera, the Micronesian Hylaeus is of the subgenus Euprosopoides, while the remaining Hylaeus are of the subgenus Prosopisteron. Posterior supports are indicated at nodes, and dashed lines indicate inferred positioning from male genitalic characters. Images show the female faces (left), male face (middle), and male sternite 8 (right) for each species, where specimens exist. Note the bifurcation on posterior lobe (top) of sternite 8 for the middle Fiji–French Polynesia clade compared to the simple apex on the lower Fiji-only clade. Within-species genetic variation was essentially non-existent and so the terminals were flattened. The sternite 8 line drawing of H. tuamotuensis Michener, 1965 is reproduced from Michener (1965).
Hylaeus albaeus Dorey, Davies, and Parslow sp. nov. Male lateral habitus (A), face (B), dorsal mesosoma (C), genitalia (D), and sternite 7 (E). Female lateral habitus (F), face (G), and dorsal mesosoma (H). (Scale bar, A-C, F-H = 1.00 mm; D, E = 0.25 mm.)
Hylaeus apertus Dorey, Davies, and Parslow sp. nov. Male lateral habitus (A), face (B), dorsal mesosoma (C), genitalia (D), and sternite 7 (E). Female lateral habitus (F), face (G), and dorsal mesosoma (H). (Scale bar, A-C, F-H = 1.00 mm; D, E = 0.25 mm.)
Hylaeus aureaviridis Dorey, Magnacca, and Parslow sp. nov. Male lateral habitus (A), face (B), dorsal mesosoma (C), genitalia (D), and sternite 7 (E). Female lateral habitus (F), face (G), and dorsal mesosoma (H). (Scale bar, A-C, F-H = 1.00 mm; D, E = 0.25 mm.)

+6

Canopy specialist Hylaeus bees highlight sampling biases and resolve Michener’s mystery
  • Article
  • Full-text available

February 2024

·

175 Reads

·

1 Citation

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

·

·

·

[...]

·

Ben A. Parslow

Large parts of the Pacific were thought to host low bee diversity. In Fiji alone, our recent estimates of native bee diversity have rapidly increased by a factor of five (from 4 to >22). Here, we show how including sampling of the forest canopy has quickly uncovered a new radiation of Hylaeus (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) bees in Fiji. We also show that Hylaeus are more common across the Pacific than previously thought and solve one of Charles Michener’s mysteries by linking the previously enigmatic French Polynesian Hylaeus tuamotuensis to relatives in Fiji. We use systematic techniques to describe eight new Hylaeus species in Fiji (n = 6), French Polynesia (n = 1), and Micronesia (n = 1), and discuss impressive dispersal events by this genus. These clades also double the number of Hylaeus dispersals out of Australia from two to four. Our discovery highlights the severe impact of bee sampling methods on ecological interpretations and species discovery, specifically that canopy sampling is needed to correctly assess forest bee diversity even where there is a very long record of sampling. It further highlights the potential for forests to host higher-than-anticipated diversity and conservation value. This has broad methodological and regulatory impacts for land managers seeking to make choices about pollination services and diversity. The new species are Hylaeus (Euprosopoides) chuukensis Dorey, Davies, and Parslow; H. (Prosopisteron) albaeus Dorey, Davies, and Parslow; H. (P.) apertus Dorey, Davies, and Parslow; H. (P.) aureaviridis Dorey, Magnacca, and Parslow; H. (P.) breviflavus Magnacca; H. (P.) derectus Dorey, Davies, and Parslow; H. (P.) navai Dorey, Davies, and Parslow; and H. (P.) veli Dorey, Davies, and Parslow.

Download
Share

Eocincticornia multitudinea (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), a gall midge malforming leaves of Eucalyptus in south-eastern Australia

October 2023

·

26 Reads

Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia

A gall midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), originally described as Ascelis (?) multitudinea Tepper, 1893 and erroneously placed in Coccoidea (Hemiptera), is redescribed and placed in Eocincticornia multitudinea (Tepper) n. comb. The larvae of E. multitudinea feed and induce large, spherical, green, yellow or red galls on leaves of Eucalyptus obliqua, E. piperita, E. baxteri, E. radiata, E. goniocalyx and E. fastigata in south-eastern Australia. The scope of the genus Eocincticornia Felt is updated.


Correction to: Disparate continental scale patterns in floral host breadth of Australian colletid bees (Colletidae: Hymenoptera)

June 2023

·

28 Reads

Apidologie

Plant-bee networks are rarely, if ever, studied quantitatively at continental scales, yet these have the potential to inform how biota and ecosystems are assembled beyond narrower regional biomes. The short-tongued bee family Colletidae comprises the major component of bee diversity in Australia, with three key subfamilies: the Neopasiphaeinae, Hylaeinae and Euryglossinae. We use museum data (>27,000 records) to record binary interactions between these bees (from each of these subfamilies, resolved to subgenera) and plants (resolved to genera). The resulting networks were analysed using bipartite graphs and associated indices of network structure. The three bee subfamilies showed markedly different network structures with their floral hosts. Euryglossinae had strong interactions with Myrtaceae and an otherwise relatively narrow host breadth, Neopasiphaeinae had little signal of host specialisation above genera and a very broad host breadth, and Hylaeinae appeared intermediate in network structure. Furthermore, Euryglossinae is more speciose within Australia (404 species, or ~ 25% of described Australian bee fauna) than Hylaeinae and Neopasiphaeinae, but these differences do not correspond to the stem ages of the three subfamilies, suggesting that time-since-origin does not explain bee species diversity or floral host breadth. Patterns of host breadth persist after rarefaction analyses that correct for differing numbers of observation records. We suggest that visitation networks could be influenced by evolutionary constraints to expansion of floral host breadth, but it is also possible that many bee-plant interactions are shaped by bees exploiting floral traits that are driven by non-bee fauna operating at large biogeographical scales.


Figure 2. Rarefaction curves for colletid bee subfamilies Euryglossinae, Hylaeinae and Neopasiphaeinae, used to calculate Simpson's index of diversity in floral host breadth, run for 1000 iterations.
Figure 3. Floral host breadth network for the Australian colletid subfamily Euryglossinae. Bee subgenera are on the left, plant genera on the right with three families of interest colour coded (Fabaceae = lightest green/top, Myrtaceae = medium green/middle, Proteaceae = darkest green/bottom). Thickness of horizontal denotes the total number of linkages for each bee or plant subgenus/genus in the dataset. One line indicates one binary visitation record between the bee subgenera and the plant genera.
Figure 4. Floral host breadth network for the Australian colletid subfamily Hylaeinae. Bee subgenera are on the left, plant genera on the right with three families of interest colour coded (Fabaceae = lightest orange/top, Myrtaceae = medium orange/middle, Proteaceae = darkest orange/bottom). Thickness of horizontal bars denotes the total number of linkages for each bee or plant subgenus/genus in the dataset. One line indicates one binary visitation record between the bee subgenera and the plant genera.
Figure 5. Floral host breadth network for the Australian colletid subfamily Neopasiphaeinae. Bee subgenera are on the left, plant genera on the right with three families of interest colour coded (Fabaceae = lightest blue/top, Myrtaceae = medium blue/middle, Proteaceae = darkest blue/bottom). Thickness of horizontal bars denotes the total number of linkages for each bee or plant subgenus/genus in the dataset. One line indicates one binary visitation record between the bee subgenera and the plant genera.
Disparate continental scale patterns in floral host breadth of Australian colletid bees (Colletidae: Hymenoptera)

March 2023

·

166 Reads

·

3 Citations

Apidologie

Plant-bee networks are rarely, if ever, studied quantitatively at continental scales, yet these have the potential to inform how biota and ecosystems are assembled beyond narrower regional biomes. The short-tongued bee family Colletidae comprises the major component of bee diversity in Australia, with three key subfamilies: the Neopasiphaeinae, Hylaeinae, and Euryglossinae. We use museum data (> 27,000 records) to record binary interactions between these bees (from each of these subfamilies, resolved to subgenera) and plants (resolved to genera). The resulting networks were analysed using bipartite graphs and associated indices of network structure. The three bee subfamilies showed markedly different network structures with their floral hosts. Euryglossinae had strong interactions with Myrtaceae and an otherwise relatively narrow host breadth, Neopasiphaeinae had little signal of host specialisation above genera and a very broad host breadth, and Hylaeinae appeared intermediate in network structure. Furthermore, Euryglossinae is more speciose within Australia (404 species, or ~ 25% of described Australian bee fauna) than Hylaeinae and Neopasiphaeinae, but these differences do not correspond to the stem ages of the three subfamilies, suggesting that time-since-origin does not explain bee species diversity or floral host breadth. Patterns of host breadth persist after rarefaction analyses that correct for differing numbers of observation records. We suggest that visitation networks could be influenced by evolutionary constraints to expansion of floral host breadth, but it is also possible that many bee-plant interactions are shaped by bees exploiting floral traits that are driven by non-bee fauna operating at large biogeographical scales. Euryglossinae / Hylaeinae / Neopasiphaeinae / Pollination / Myrtaceae

Citations (2)


... For instance, bee composition of the understory differed from the canopy between early spring and summer, but notably the midstory composition differed from that of the understory across seasons yet was never statistically different from the canopy. This clear seasonal shift in composition among strata indicates that forest-bee communities are spatially and temporally dynamic, and highlight the possibility for seasonaldependent stratum specialists (Dorey et al., 2024). Further investigation into the local factors responsible for the occurrence of species along the vertical gradient of resource availability within the forest will surely provide insight into how many strata need to be considered in sampling strategies, or if vertical sampling is better approached as a continuum. ...

Reference:

Sampling the understory, midstory, and canopy is necessary to fully characterize native bee communities of temperate forests and their dynamic environmental relationships
Canopy specialist Hylaeus bees highlight sampling biases and resolve Michener’s mystery
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

... It is the only continent with an endemic bee family (Stenotritidae), and has hyper-diverse representation of select clades of Colletidae (Neopasiphaeinae, Euryglossinae and Hylaeinae [111]), as well as the complete absence of the families Andrenidae and Melittidae [26,27]. Australian colletids are known to exhibit conserved foraging niche preferences for native Australian plant families, particularly Euryglossinae and Hylaeinae with Myrtaceae & Fabaceae [112], which accounts for the very limited evidence of colletid visitation to introduced Rosaceae cultivars like apple in Australia. Our literature search indicates that the top four bee genera reported in Palaearctic and Nearctic apple orchard research studies do not naturally occur in Australasia (table 1; electronic royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rspb Proc. ...

Disparate continental scale patterns in floral host breadth of Australian colletid bees (Colletidae: Hymenoptera)

Apidologie