Anna Tonkonogy's scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.

It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.

If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.

If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Locating Self-Modifying Feelings Within Literary Reading
  • Article
  • Full-text available

September 2004

·

561 Reads

·

67 Citations

Discourse Processes

·

·

Michelle Gregus

·

[...]

·

Anna Tonkonogy

Self-modifying feelings during literary reading were studied in relation to the personality trait, absorption. Participants read a short story, described their experience of 3 striking or evocative passages in the story, and completed the Tellegen Absorption Scale (Tellegen, 1982). Compared to readers with either low or moderate absorption scores, those high in absorption were more likely to report affective theme variations and self-perceptual shifts, especially during an emotionally complicated portion of the story. Further analyses indicated that, rather than emotional involvement per se, the relationship between absorption and self-perceptual shifts was mediated by the interaction between theme variations and a style of expressive reflection called metaphors of personal identification.

Download
Share

Citations (1)


... A score of 0 indicates that the word was never highlighted, and thus, a score of 31 or 35 indicates that the word was highlighted by every participant. In line with previous research (e.g., Kuiken et al., 2004), we considered as a threshold for the following analysis the words that were highlighted by 10 or more participants, which corresponds to approximately 30% of the sample. Second, a comparison between the four groups of readers divided according to their level of Foregrounding Processing is provided, considering the words that were highlighted by at least 30% of the participants. ...

Reference:

The role of processing foregrounding in empathic reactions in literary reading
Locating Self-Modifying Feelings Within Literary Reading

Discourse Processes