ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

The Use of Folic Acid for the Prevention of Neural Tube Defects and Other Congenital Anomalies

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

To provide information regarding the use of folic acid for the prevention of neural tube defects (NTDs) and other congenital anomalies, in order that physicians, midwives, nurses, and other health-care workers can assist in the education of women in the preconception phase of their health care. OPTION: Folic acid supplementation is problematic, since 50% of pregnancies are unplanned and the health status of women may not be optimal. Folic acid supplementation has been proven to decrease or minimize specific birth defects. A systematic review of the literature, including review and peer-reviewed articles, government publications, the previous Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) Policy Statement of March 1993, and statements from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, was used to develop a new clinical practice guideline for the SOGC. Peer-review process within the committee structure. The benefit is reduced lethal and severe morbidity birth defects and the harm is minimal. The personal cost is of vitamin supplementation on a daily basis and eating a healthy diet. 1. Women in the reproductive age group should be advised about the benefits of folic acid supplementation during wellness visits (birth control renewal, Pap testing, yearly examination), especially if pregnancy is contemplated. (III-A) 2. Women should be advised to maintain a healthy nutritional diet, as recommended in Canada's Food Guide to Healthy Eating (good or excellent sources of folic acid: broccoli, spinach, peas, Brussels sprouts, corn, beans, lentils, oranges). (III-A) 3. Women who could become pregnant should be advised to take a multivitamin containing 0.4 mg to 1.0 mg of folic acid daily. (II-1A) 4. Women taking a multivitamin with folic acid supplement should be advised not to take more than 1 daily dose of vitamin supplement, as indicated on the product label. (II-2A) 5. Women in intermediate- to high-risk categories for NTDs (NTD-affected previous pregnancy, family history, insulin-dependent diabetes, epilepsy treatment with valproic acid or carbamazepine) should be advised that high-dose folic acid (4.0 mg-5.0 mg daily) supplementation is recommended. This should be taken as folic acid alone, not in a multivitamin format, due to risk of excessive intake of other vitamins such as vitamin A. (I-A) 6. The choice of a 5 mg folic acid daily dose for women considering a pregnancy should be made under medical supervision after minimizing the risk of undiagnosed vitamin B12 deficiency (hypersegmentation of polymorphonuclear cells, macrocystic indices, large ovalocytes, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, markedly elevated lactate dehydrogenase level, confirmed red blood cell folate level). (II-2A) 7. Signs or symptoms of vitamin B12 deficiency should be considered before initiating folic acid supplementation of doses greater than 1.0 mg. (III-A) 8. A three-generation pedigree on the families of both the pregnant woman and the biological father should be obtained to identify increased risk for congenital birth defects (i.e., NTD, cardiac, chromosomal, genetic). (III-A) 9. Women who become pregnant should be advised of the availability of noninvasive screening tests and invasive diagnostic tests for congenital birth defects (including NTDs): maternal serum "triple marker screen" at 15 to 20 weeks, ultrasound at 16 to 20 weeks, and amniocentesis after 15 weeks of pregnancy if a positive screening test is present. (I-A) VALIDATION: This is a revision of a previous guideline and information from other consensus reviews from medical and government publications has been used.
Content may be subject to copyright.
JOGC NOVEMBER 2003
Abstract
Objective: To provide information regarding the use of folic acid
for the prevention of neural tube defects (NTDs) and other
congenital anomalies, in order that physicians, midwives, nurses,
and other health-care workers can assist in the education of
women in the preconception phase of their health care.
Option: Folic acid supplementation is problematic, since 50% of
pregnancies are unplanned and the health status of women
may not be optimal.
Outcomes: Folic acid supplementation has been proven to
decrease or minimize specific birth defects.
Evidence: A systematic review of the literature, including review
and peer-reviewed articles, government publications, the pre-
vious Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada
(SOGC) Policy Statement of March 1993, and statements from
the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, was used
to develop a new clinical practice guideline for the SOGC.
Values: Peer-review process within the committee structure.
Benefits, harms, and costs: The benefit is reduced lethal and
severe morbidity birth defects and the harm is minimal.The
personal cost is of vitamin supplementation on a daily basis
and eating a healthy diet.
Recommendations:
1. Women in the reproductive age group should be advised
about the benefits of folic acid supplementation during well-
ness visits (birth control renewal, Pap testing, yearly examina-
tion), especially if pregnancy is contemplated. (III-A)
2. Women should be advised to maintain a healthy nutritional
diet, as recommended in Canada’s Food Guide to Healthy Eating
(good or excellent sources of folic acid: broccoli, spinach, peas,
Brussels sprouts, corn, beans, lentils, oranges). (III-A)
3. Women who could become pregnant should be advised to
take a multivitamin containing 0.4 mg to 1.0 mg of folic acid
daily. (II-1A)
4. Women taking a multivitamin with folic acid supplement
should be advised not to take more than 1 daily dose of
vitamin supplement, as indicated on the product label. (II-2A)
5. Women in intermediate- to high-risk categories for NTDs
(NTD-affected previous pregnancy, family history, insulin-
dependent diabetes, epilepsy treatment with valproic acid or
carbamazepine) should be advised that high-dose folic acid
(4.0 mg–5.0 mg daily) supplementation is recommended. This
should be taken as folic acid alone,not in a multivitamin for-
mat, due to risk of excessive intake of other vitamins such as
vitamin A. (I-A)
6. The choice of a 5 mg folic acid daily dose for women consid-
ering a pregnancy should be made under medical supervision
after minimizing the risk of undiagnosed vitamin B12 deficiency
(hypersegmentation of polymorphonuclear cells, macrocystic
indices, large ovalocytes, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia,
markedly elevated lactate dehydrogenase level, confirmed red
blood cell folate level). (II-2A)
7. Signs or symptoms of vitamin B12 deficiency should be con-
sidered before initiating folic acid supplementation of doses
greater than 1.0 mg. (III-A)
8. A three-generation pedigree on the families of both the preg-
nant woman and the biological father should be obtained to
1
THE USE OF FOLIC ACID FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEURAL
TUBE DEFECTS AND OTHER CONGENITAL ANOMALIES
This guideline has been prepared by the Genetics Committee and approved by the
Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.
SOGC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES
No. 138, November 2003
These guidelines reflect emerging clinical and scientific advances as of the date issued and are subject to change.The information should not be construed as
dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Local institutions can dictate amendments to these opinions.They should be well doc-
umented if modified at the local level. None of the contents may be reproduced in any form without prior written permission of SOGC.
PRINCIPAL AUTHOR
R. Douglas Wilson, MD, FRCSC, Philadelphia PA
GENETICS COMMITTEE
R. Douglas Wilson (Chair), MD, FRCSC, Philadelphia PA
Gregory Davies, MD, FRCSC, Kingston ON
Valérie Désilets, MD, FRCSC, Montreal QC
Gregory J. Reid, MD, FRCSC,Winnipeg MB
Anne Summers, MD, FRCPC, Toronto ON
Philip Wyatt, MD, PhD,Toronto ON
David Young, MD, FRCSC, Halifax NS
Key Words
Folic acid, neural tube defect, prevention, myelomeningocele,
anencephaly, spina bifida, risk reduction
identify increased risk for congenital birth defects (i.e., NTD,
cardiac, chromosomal, genetic). (III-A)
9. Women who become pregnant should be advised of the avail-
ability of noninvasive screening tests and invasive diagnostic
tests for congenital birth defects (including NTDs): maternal
serum “triple marker screen” at 15 to 20 weeks, ultrasound
at 16 to 20 weeks, and amniocentesis after 15 weeks of preg-
nancy if a positive screening test is present. (I-A)
Validation: This is a revision of a previous guideline and infor-
mation from other consensus reviews from medical and gov-
ernment publications has been used.
Sponsor: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of
Canada.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003;25(11):959–65.
INTRODUCTION
It is estimated that at least 5% of babies are born with some
serious congenital anomaly.1Of these 5 babies in 100, 2 or 3 will
have anomalies that can be recognized prenatally by a non-
invasive screening test, through invasive diagnostic testing,
or at birth, while the other 2 babies will have developmental or
functional anomalies recognized during the first year of their life.1
The ingestion of folic acid by a woman prior to conception and
during the early stages of pregnancy plays a role in preventing
neural tube defects (NTDs) and has been associated with pre-
venting other congenital anomalies.2Public health initiatives to
increase the awareness and prevention of birth defects have
focused on folic acid intake for the prevention of NTDs, but there
are several studies that have indicated that taking multiple vita-
mins containing folic acid during the periconception period can
reduce the risk of other neonatal conditions such as congenital
heart defects,2-5 urinary tract anomalies,5,6 oral facial clefts,2,7-9
limb defects,2and pyloric stenosis.3It has been estimated that as
many as half of all birth defects can be prevented if women of
childbearing age consume an adequate amount of folic acid, either
by eating sufficient quantities of foods that are fortified with folic
acid or by taking vitamin supplements.10
The objective of this clinical practice guideline update is to
inform women’s health-care providers of new information regard-
ing the use of folic acid for the prevention of neural tube defects
and other congenital anomalies. The quality of evidence reported
in this guideline has been described using the Evaluation of
Evidence criteria outlined in the Report of the Canadian Task
Force on the Periodic Health Examination (Table 1).11
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature, including review and peer-
reviewed articles, government publications, the previous Society
of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC)
Policy Statement The Use of Folic Acid for Prevention of Neural
Tube Defects published in March 1993,12 and statements from
the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology,13 was used
to develop a new clinical practice guideline for the SOGC.
JOGC NOVEMBER 2003
2
TABLE 1
QUALITY OF EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT11
The quality of evidence reported in these guidelines has been
described using the Evaluation of Evidence criteria outlined in
the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health
Examination.
1: Evidence obtained from at least one properly randomized
controlled trial.
II-1: Evidence from well-designed controlled trials without
randomization.
II-2: Evidence from well-designed cohort (prospective or
retrospective) or case-control studies, preferably from
more than one centre or research group.
II-3: Evidence obtained from comparisons between times or
places with or without the intervention. Dramatic results
in uncontrolled experiments (such as the results of treat-
ment with penicillin in the 1940s) could also be included
in this category.
III: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical
experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert
committees.
CLASSIFICATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS11
Recommendations included in these guidelines have been
adapted from the ranking method described in the
Classification of Recommendations found in the Canadian
Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.
A. There is good evidence to support the recommendation
that the condition be specifically considered in a periodic
health examination.
B. There is fair evidence to support the recommendation
that the condition be specifically considered in a periodic
health examination.
C. There is poor evidence regarding the inclusion or
exclusion of the condition in a periodic health examination,
but recommendations may be made on other grounds.
D. There is fair evidence to support the recommendation
that the condition not be considered in a periodic health
examination.
E. There is good evidence to support the recommendation
that the condition be excluded from consideration in a
periodic health examination.
JOGC NOVEMBER 2003
3
RESULTS
NEURAL TUBE DEFECTS
INCIDENCES AND INHERITANCE
Neural tube defects are severe birth anomalies, due to the lack
of neural tube closure at either the upper or lower end in the
third to fourth week after conception (day 26 to day 28 post-
conception).14 The incidence and the empiric recurrence risk for
NTDs vary across North American regions (Table 2).10,14-22
In Canada, the birth prevalence of NTDs has declined
from a rate of 11.6 per 10 000 live births in 1989 to 7.5 per
10 000 total births (live births and stillbirths) in 1997.23 Reasons
given for this decrease in the rate of NTDs include an increased
usage of prenatal diagnoses (ultrasound, maternal serum screen-
ing) with subsequent pregnancy termination and, possibly,
increased vitamin supplementation.23 The rate of NTDs tends
to be higher in Eastern Canada than in Western Canada.24,25
Women of certain ethnic groups including Celtic26 and Sikh,27
as well as women from Northern China,28 are at higher risks of
having children with NTDs.24-28 It remains unclear whether these
risks vary due to genetic predisposition, culture dietary prefer-
ences, or a combination of these factors.
Multifactorial inheritance24,29,30 is the most common cause of
NTDs, but monogenic, chromosomal, and teratogenic causes
have specific risks and have not been studied in association with
folic acid deprivation or supplementation (Table 3).14 The prev-
alence of aneuploidy and additional anatomical abnormalities in
fetuses with open spina bifida was reviewed using Utah birth defect
network data.31 Chromosome results were known in 45 of 51 cases
of open spina bifida, with 6 cases (13%) having aneuploidy.
Additional major anatomic abnormalities were present in 4 of the
6 cases and included cardiac, renal, omphalocele, brain, and bi-
lateral oral clefting. There was a 4% risk of aneuploidy in sono-
graphically isolated spina bifida cases within this population.31
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Prenatal diagnosis should be specifically and appropriately timed
to women with an increased risk of having a child with an
NTD.32-38 Folic acid supplementation will not eliminate but
TABLE 2
INCIDENCE AND RECURRENCE RISK FOR NTD
IN DIFFERENT REGIONS OF
CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES1,10,19-22
Region Incidence Recurrence Risks
(per 1000 total births)
(%)
British Columbia 1.6 2.1
Ontario 1.2 (1986) 2.4
1.6 (1995)
0.9 (1999)
Quebec 4.0 4.5
Nova Scotia 2.6 (1991–1997)
1.2 (1998–2000)
Newfoundland 4.0 5.0
United States 1.4–1.6 1.5–3.0
Canada 0.75 (1997)
TABLE 3
RECOGNIZED CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH
NEURAL TUBE DEFECTS14*
1. Multifactorial: Homocysteine metabolism variants
(MTHFR)
2. Monogenic: AR Acrocallosal syndrome
Cerebro-costo-mandibular syndrome
Fanconi’s pancytopenia syndrome
Fraser’s syndrome
Hydrolethalus syndrome
Jarcho-Levin syndrome
Meckel-Gruber syndrome
AD Waardenburg’s syndrome
3. Chromosomal: Miller-Dieker syndrome (deletion 17p13.3)
Triploidy
Trisomy 9 (mosaic)
Trisomy 13
Trisomy 18
4. Teratogen: Fetal hyperthermia spectrum
Fetal alcohol syndrome
Fetal amniopterin/methotrexate
syndrome
Fetal rubella
Fetal valproate/carbamazepine/maternal
epilepsy syndrome
Maternal insulin-dependent diabetes
(preconception)
5. Unknown: Caudal dysplasia sequence
Child syndrome
Extrophy of cloacae sequence
Laterality sequences
Limb-body Wall complex
Monozygotic twinning
*NTD: neural tube defect; MTHFR: 5,10-methylenetetra-
hydrofolate reductase;AR: autosomal recessive inheritance;
AD: autosomal dominant inheritance.
only reduce the risk of NTDs.39 Women at increased risk for a
pregnancy complicated by NTDs often have a history of:
• a previous fetus or child with an NTD12,13,37,40
a first-, second-, or third-degree relation with an
NTD12,37,40
• insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes12,37,40
epilepsy and the ingestion of valproic acid or carba-
mazepine for seizure control12,37,40
use of folic acid antagonists (amniopterin, methotrex-
ate)12,37,40
Noninvasive prenatal diagnoses by ultrasound and maternal
serum screening38 should be offered at 16 to 20 weeks’ and
15 to 20 weeks’ gestation, respectively, and will identify 95% to
100% of NTDs (anencephaly, 100%; spina bifida, 95%). Ultra-
sound imaging41,42 of the cranium and the identification of
cranial scalloping (lemon sign) and cerebellar crowding (banana
sign) in association with mild ventriculomegaly is diagnostic of
an open myelomeningocele, even if a defect is not easily identifi-
able in the spine due to the level of the spinal defect, fetal
position, or maternal habitus. After 15 weeks of pregnancy,
invasive prenatal diagnosis with ultrasound-guided amniocentesis,
with confirmation by increased levels of amniotic fluid alphafeto-
protein and acetylcholinesterase, can be diagnostic of open or
closed lesions, and used to evaluate fetal karyotype.38
FOLIC ACID AND PREVENTION
A recent Health Canada document40 entitled Preconception
Health: Folic Acid for Primary Prevention of Neural Tube Defects –
a Resource Document for Health Professionals 2002, states that, from
the human data, it is clear that periconceptional use of supple-
ments containing folic acid substantially reduces the risks of
occurrence (first affected pregnancy) and recurrence (additional
affected pregnancies) of neural tube defects.
Women should be advised to maintain a healthy nutri-
tional diet as recommended in Canada’s Food Guide to Healthy
Eating.43 Good or excellent sources of folic acid are found in
broccoli, spinach, peas, Brussels sprouts, corn, lentils, and
oranges.
A randomized trial44 for the prevention of primary occurrence
found periconceptional vitamin supplementation (12 vitamins
including 0.8 mg of folic acid, 4 minerals, 3 trace elements)
decreased the incidence of a first occurrence of an NTD. Previous
case control studies had provided supportive and equivocal
evidence that pregnant women using multivitamins containing
folic acid or dietary folic acid had a lower risk of occurrence of
NTDs than women not taking supplements.45-49
For prevention of recurrence of NTDs, a randomized
double-blind clinical trial,39 involving 1195 completed
pregnancies in high-risk women from 33 centres, reported
72% fewer cases of NTDs among the children of the folic acid
supplementation group than among the offspring of controls
who did not take folic acid supplementation.39 The recurrence
rate decreased from 3.5% to 1% for women randomized to
receive 4 mg folic acid supplementation prior to pregnancy and
throughout the first 6 weeks of pregnancy. The results in the
group taking vitamins without folic acid were similar to the
results in the group not taking vitamin supplementation, with
recurrence risks of 3.5%.
Wald et al.50 looked at the dose of folic acid to maximize the
already known benefit of folic acid in preventing NTDs. The study
analyzed published data from 13 other studies of folic acid
supplementation on serum folate concentrations, as well as results
from a large cohort study of the risk of NTDs according to serum
folate. The results of the analysis indicated that the folic acid
preventive effect is greater in women with an initial low serum
folate concentration than in women with higher serum folate con-
centrations. The results of serum folate levels have also been used
to predict direct observations from large randomized trials on
the effect of food fortification in preventing NTDs. For Caucasian
women, a serum folate of 5 ng/mL, about 0.2 mg per day (the
United States’ level of folic acid fortification) would be expected
to reduce NTDs by about 20%.50 A similar effect can be expect-
ed from the current British fortification recommendation of
0.24 mg per day. An increase of 0.4 mg/day would reduce the risk
by about 36%, 1 mg per day by 57%, and the use of a 5 mg tablet
daily would reduce risk by about 85%. Wald et al.50 concluded
that folic acid fortification levels should be increased accordingly,
and that women planning a pregnancy should take 5 mg folic acid
tablets daily instead of the 0.4 mg dose presently recommended.
Subsequent letters to the editor showed support51,52 for the con-
cept while others recommended caution.53 The choice of a 5 mg
folic acid daily dose for Canadian women considering a preg-
nancy should be made under medical supervision after minimiz-
ing the risk of undiagnosed vitamin B12 deficiency.
FOLIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION AND BIRTH
DEFECTS OTHER THAN NEURAL TUBE DEFECTS
Folic acid supplementation has been shown to benefit other con-
genital anomalies, such as congenital heart defects,2-5 urinary
tract anomalies,5,6 oral facial clefts,2,7-9 limb defects,2and pyloric
stenosis.3A recent review54 summarizes the recent literature
regarding prevention of congenital anomalies with periconcep-
tional folic acid supplementation.
POTENTIAL HARM OF EXCESS FOLIC ACID INTAKE
Folic acid, in the recommended dosage of 0.4 to 1.0 mg,12,13,40 is
not known to cause demonstrable harm to the developing fetus
or the pregnant woman.16-21 Folic acid is water soluble and its
excess is excreted through the urinary tract. The effects of
higher intake of folic acid (i.e., >1 mg) are not well known, but
they include masking the diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency. This
concern has led to a recommendation that, for healthy women,
JOGC NOVEMBER 2003
4
JOGC NOVEMBER 2003
5
1 mg of folic acid daily (from either folic acid supplements or
fortified foods) be considered the maximum dose.12,13
Folic acid can mask vitamin B12 deficiency by correcting the
mesoblastic anemia changes normally identifiable, but it does not
prevent the neurological complications of vitamin B12 deficiency.
In fact, there has been some concern that high doses of folic acid
may precipitate or exacerbate neurological symptoms of vitamin
B12 deficiency.50-53 Clinical symptoms of vitamin B12 deficiency
include tiredness, fatigability, chronic malaise, sore tongue, ataxic
gait, and numbness of the fingers.55 Women with signs of red
cracked tongue, peripheral neuropathy, ataxia, pallor, and other
signs of anemia, and those given a dose of folic acid greater than
1 mg per day, should be investigated for possible vitamin B12
deficiency.55 Other hematological characteristics55 of vitamin B12
deficiency include hypersegmentation of polymorphonuclear cells,
macrocystic indices, large ovalocytes, leukopenia, and thrombo-
cytopenia. A markedly elevated lactate dehydrogenase level and
red blood cell folate level are also usually observed.55
Folic acid rarely has allergic responses but these may include
erythema, rash, itching, general malaise, and bronchospasm.56
INTERACTION OF DRUGS WITH FOLIC ACID
Serum folic acid levels may be affected by the metabolism of
other medications, including antineoplastic agents, epileptic
medications, oral contraceptives, and other medications
(Table 4).12,13,40 Folic acid has recognized drug interactions57
with other commonly used medications such as hyperten-
sive/thiazide combinations, digoxin, thyroid hormones, tetra-
cycline, and thiazide diuretics.
VITAMINS AND MINERALS
There is strong evidence that the use of a multivitamin–
multimineral supplement containing folic acid at 0.4 mg per
daily dose reduces the risk of a first-occurrence NTD.40 The
combination of ingredients varies greatly in over-the-counter
preparations. It is suggested that multivitamin–multimineral
preparations with 0.4 mg–1.0 mg of folic acid per daily dose
be taken,40 but that mineral supplementation may not be
necessary, due to the low risk of deficiency in Canada.40
Supplements containing herbs and other “nonmedicinal
ingredients” should be avoided, as they have neither been proven
to have any benefit nor been studied regarding harm.
Multivitamins should have vitamin A as beta-carotene rather
than as retinol. Excess retinol (10 000 IU; 3300 RE) on a daily
basis may cause birth defects.58 For this reason, women should not
take more than 1 daily dose, as indicated on the product label.
FOLIC ACID FOOD FORTIFICATION
In Canada since 1998, in an effort to reduce the rate of NTDs,
there has been mandatory fortification of white flour, enriched
pasta, and cornmeal with folic acid. The overall benefit of for-
tification in reducing NTDs is yet to be determined.40,59 The
minimal effective dose is also unknown.40,59
CONCLUSION
Folic acid (through diet and supplementation) has been proven
to decrease or minimize specific birth defects including neural
tube defects, congenital heart disease, urinary tract anomalies,
oral facial clefts, limb defects, and pyloric stenosis.2-9 Precon-
ceptional folic acid supplementation should be recommended
to women who may become pregnant. The dose of folic acid
supplementation should be adjusted according to the patient’s
history and needs.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Women in the reproductive age group should be advised
about the benefits of folic acid supplementation during
wellness visits (birth control renewal, Pap testing, yearly
examination), especially if pregnancy is contemplated.
(III-A)
2. Women should be advised to maintain a healthy nutri-
tional diet, as recommended in Canada’s Food Guide to
Healthy Eating (good or excellent sources of folic acid:
broccoli, spinach, peas, Brussels sprouts, corn, beans,
lentils, oranges). (III-A)
TABLE 4
INTERACTIONS: DRUGS AND FOLIC ACID12,13,40,57
Drugs Effect Mechanism Importance
Chloramphenicol Reduced folic acid effect Interference with erythrocyte Caution
maturation
Phenobarbital, phenytoin, Reduced folic acid levels Increased folic acid metabolism Caution
primidone
Phenytoin Loss of seizure control; Increased phenytoin metabolism Monitor phenytoin levels
decreased phenytoin levels
Sulfasalazine Decreased folic acid levels Impaired absorption Caution
3. Women who could become pregnant should be advised
to take a multivitamin containing 0.4 mg to 1.0 mg of
folic acid daily. (II-1A)
4. Women taking a multivitamin with folic acid supplement
should be advised not to take more than 1 daily dose of
vitamin supplement, as indicated on the product label.
(II-2A)
5. Women in intermediate- to high-risk categories for NTDs
(NTD-affected previous pregnancy, family history,
insulin-dependent diabetes, epilepsy treatment with val-
proic acid or carbamazepine) should be advised that
high-dose folic acid (4.0 mg–5.0 mg daily) supplemen-
tation is recommended. This should be taken as folic acid
alone, not in a multivitamin format, due to risk of exces-
sive intake of other vitamins such as vitamin A. (I-A)
6. The choice of a 5 mg folic acid daily dose for women con-
sidering a pregnancy should be made under medical
supervision after minimizing the risk of undiagnosed
vitamin B12 deficiency (hypersegmentation of polymor-
phonuclear cells, macrocystic indices, large ovalocytes,
leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, markedly elevated lac-
tate dehydrogenase level, confirmed red blood cell folate
level). (II-2A)
7. Signs or symptoms of vitamin B12 deficiency should be
considered before initiating folic acid supplementation
of doses greater than 1.0 mg. (III-A)
8. A three-generation pedigree on the families of both the
pregnant woman and the biological father should be
obtained to identify increased risk for congenital birth
defects (i.e., NTD, cardiac, chromosomal, genetic).
(III-A)
9. Women who become pregnant should be advised of the
availability of noninvasive screening tests and invasive
diagnostic tests for congenital birth defects (including
NTDs): maternal serum “triple marker screen” at 15 to
20 weeks, ultrasound at 16 to 20 weeks, and amnio-
centesis after 15 weeks of pregnancy if a positive screen-
ing test is present. (I-A)
REFERENCES
1. Kohut R,Rusen ID.Congenital anomalies in Canada. Health Canada:
a perinatal health report 2002. Ottawa: Ministry of Public Works and
Government Services Canada; 2002.
2. Czeizel AE. Prevention of congenital abnormalities by periconceptional
multivitamin supplementation. BMJ 1993;306:1645–8.
3. Shaw GM, O’Malley CD,Wasserman CR,Tolarova MM,Lammer EJ.
Maternal periconceptional use of multivitamins and reduced risk for
conotruncal heart defects and limb deficiencies among offspring.
Am J Med Genet 1995;59:536–45.
4. Botto LD,Khoury MJ, Mulinara J,Erickson JD. Periconceptional
multivitamin use and the occurrence of conotruncal heart defects:
results from a population-based,case-control study. Pediatrics
1996;98:911–7.
5. Czeizel AE. Reduction of urinary tract and cardiovascular defects by
periconceptional multivitamin supplementation. Am J Med Genet
1996;62:179–83.
6. Li DK, Daling JR, Mueller BA, Hickok DE, Fantel AG,Weiss NS.
Periconceptional multivitamin use in relation to the risk of congenital
urinary tract anomalies. Epidemiology 1995;6:212–8.
7. Hayes C,Werler MM,Willett WC, Mitchell AA.Case-control study
of periconceptional folic acid supplementation and oral clefts.
Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:1229–34.
8. Shaw GM, Lammer EJ,Wasserman CR, O’Malley CD,Tolarova MM.
Risks of orofacial clefts in children born to women using multivitamins
containing folic acid periconceptionally. Lancet 1995;345:393–6.
9. Tolarova M,Harris J. Reduced recurrence of orofacial clefts after
periconceptional supplementation with high-dose folic acid and
multivitamins.Teratology 1995;51:71–8.
10. Hall JG. Folic acid: the opportunity that still exists. Can Med Assoc J
2000;162:1571–2.
11. Woolf SH,Battista RN, Angerson GM, Logan AG,Eel W. Canadian
Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Ottawa: Canada
Communication Group; 1994. p. xxxvii.
12. SOGC Genetics Committee. Recommendations on the use of folic
acid for the prevention of neural tube defects.SOGC Policy Statement.
J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 1993;15(Suppl March 1993):41–6.
13. Maternal serum screening. American College of Obstetrics and
Gynecology Educational Bulletin 1996;228:603–11.
14. Jones KL. Smith’s recognizable patterns of human malformation.
5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1997. p. 608.
15. Trimble BK, Baird PA.Congenital anomalies of the central nervous
system. Incidence in British Columbia 1952–1972. Teratology
1978;1743–9.
16. Hunter AGW. Neural tube defects in eastern Ontario and western
Quebec: demography and family data. Am J Med Genet 1984;19:45–63.
17. Frecker M,Fraser FC. Epidemiological studies of neural tube defects in
Newfoundland.Teratology 1987;36:355–61.
18. Dallaire L, Melancon SB, Potier M,Matthiew M-P,Ducharme G.
Date of conception and prevention of neural tube defects.
Clinical Genetics 1984;26:304–7.
19. McBride ML. Sib risks of anencephaly and spina bifida in British
Columbia. Am J Med Genet 1979;3:377–87.
20. Dallaire L, Michaud J, Melancon SB,Potier M, Lambert M, Mitchell G,
et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies during the second trimester
of pregnancy: their characterization and delineation of defects in preg-
nancies at risk. Prenat Diag 1991;11:629–35.
21. Gucciardi E, Pietrusiak MA, Reynolds DL,Rouleau J. Incidence of
neural tube defects in Ontario,1986–1999. Can Med Assoc J
2002;167(3):237–40.
22. Persad VL, Van den Hof MC, Dube JM,Zimmer P. Incidence of
open neural tube defects in Nova Scotia after folic acid fortification.
Can Med Assoc J 2002;167(3):241–5.
23. Health Canada. Canadian perinatal health report 2000. Ottawa:
Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2000.
24. Hall JG, Friedman JM, Kenna BA, Popkin J, Jawanda M, Arnold W,
et al. Clinical, genetic, and epidemiological factors in neural tube
defects.Am J Hum Genet 1988;43:827–37.
25. Chambers K, Popkin J, Arnold W,Irwin B, Hall JG. Neural tube
defects in British Columbia. Lancet 1994;343:489–90.
26. Little J, Elwood JM, editors.Epidemiology and control of neural tube
defects.Vol 20. In: Monograph in epidemiology and biostatistics.
Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.
27. Baird PA. Neural tube defects in the Sikhs. Am J Med Genet
1983;16:49–56.
28. Berry RJ, Li Z,Erickson JD, Li S, Moore CA, Mulinare J, et al.
Prevention of neural-tube defects with folic acid in China.
N Engl J Med 1999:341:1485–90.
29. Holmes LB, Driscoll SG, Atkins LA. Etiologic heterogeneity of
neural tube defects. N Engl J Med 1976;294:365–9.
JOGC NOVEMBER 2003
6
JOGC NOVEMBER 2003
7
30. Khoury MJ, Erickson JD,James LM. Etiologic heterogeneity of
neural tube defects: clues from epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol
1982:115:538–48.
31. Babcook CJ, Ball RH, Feldkamp ML.Prevalence of aneuploidy and
additional anatomic abnormalities in fetuses with open spina bifida:
population based study in Utah. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19:619–23.
32. Mills JL, Knopp RH, Simpson JL,Jovanovic-Peterson L,Metzger BE,
Holmes CB. Lack of relation of increased malformation rates in infants
of diabetic mothers to glycemic control during organogenesis.
N Engl J Med 1988;318:671–6.
33. Martin RH, Nimrod C. Crohn’s disease,folic acid, and neural tube
defects (NTD). Br Med J 1984;289:228.
34. Lammer EJ, Sever LE, Oakley GP Jr.Teratogen updates:valproic acid.
Teratology 1987;35:465–73.
35. Rosa FW. Spina bifida in infants of women treated with carbamazepine
during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1991;324:674–7.
36. Warkany J. Amniopterin and methotrexate:folic acid deficiency.
Teratology 1978;17:353–8.
37. Chodirker BN, Cadrin C, Davies GAL,Summers AM,
Wilson RD, Winsor EJT, et al. SOGC Genetics Committee
Members, CCMG Prenatal Diagnosis Committee Members.
Canadian guidelines for prenatal diagnosis. Genetic indications
for prenatal diagnosis.SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines, No. 105,
June 2001. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 2001;23(6):525–31.
38. Chodirker BN, Cadrin C, Davies GAL,Summers AM,Wilson RD,
Winsor EJT, et al. SOGC Genetics Committee Members,CCMG
Prenatal Diagnosis Committee Members. Canadian guidelines for
prenatal diagnosis.Techniques of prenatal diagnosis.SOGC Clinical
Practice Guidelines, No. 105,July 2001. J Obstet Gynaecol Can
2001;23(7):616–24.
39. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Prevention of neural tube defects:
results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. Lancet
1991;338:131–7.
40. Van Allen MI,McCourt C, Lee NS.Preconception health: folic acid for
the primary prevention of neural tube defects. A resource document
for health professionals,2002. Ottawa: Ontario Minister of Public
Works and Government Services Canada; 2000.
41. Monteagudo A,Timor-Tritsch IE. Fetal face and central nervous system.
In: Jaffe R, Bue TH, editors.Textbook of fetal ultrasound.New York:
Parthenon; 1999. p. 109–11.
42. Pilu G, Hobbins JC. Sonography of fetal cerebrospinal anomalies.
Prenat Diagn 2002;22:321–30.
43. Health Canada. Canada’s Food Guide to Healthy Eating. Available
on-line at <www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpfb-dgpsa/onpp-bppn/food_guide_
rainbow_e.html>. Accessed August 27, 2003.
44. Czeizel AE, Dudas L. Prevention of the first occurrence of neural tube
defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med
1992;327:1832–5.
45. Mulinare J, Cordero JF,Erickson JD,Berry RJ. Periconceptional use of
multivitamins and the occurrence of neural tube defects.J Am Med
Assoc 1988;260:3141–5.
46. Mills JL, Rhoads GG, Simpson JL,Cunningham GC, Conley MR,
Lassman MR, et al.The absence of a relation between the pericon-
ceptional use of vitamins and neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med
1989;321:430.
47. Milunsky A, Jick H, Jick SS,Bruell CL, MacLaughlin DS,Rothman KJ, et al.
Multivitamin/folic acid supplementation in early pregnancy reduces the
prevalence of neural tube defects.J Am Med Assoc 1989;262:2847–52.
48. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Use of folic acid for
prevention of spina bifida and other neural tube defects – 1983–1991.
MMWR 1991;40:513–6.
49. Bower C, Stanley FJ. Dietary folate as a risk factor for neural-tube
defects: evidence from a case-control study in Western Australia.
Med J Aust 1989;150:613–8.
50. Wald NJ,Law MR, Morris JK,Wald DS. Quantifying the effect
of folic acid. Lancet 2001;358:2069–73.
51. Davis RE. Effects of folic acid [letter]. Lancet 2002;359:2038–9.
52. Abramsky L, Noble J. Effects of folic acid [letter].Lancet 2002;359:2039.
53. Reynolds E. Effects of folic acid [letter]. Lancet 2002;359:2039–40.
54. McDonald SD,Ferguson S,Tam L, Lougheed J,Walker MC.The
prevention of congenital anomalies with periconceptional folic acid
supplementation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003;25(2):115–21.
55. Duffy TP. Hematologic aspects of pregnancy. In: Barrow GN, Duffy TP,
editors. Medical complications during pregnancy.5th ed. Philadelphia:
WB Saunders; 1999. p.82–3.
56. Leathem AM, editor.Drug information reference, second edition.
British Columbia Drug and Poison Information Centre;1984.
57. ePocrates Rx Pro [software program].Version 6. San Mateo (CA):
ePocrates, Inc.; 2003.
58. Teratology Society.Teratology Society position paper:
recommendations for vitamin use during pregnancy.
Te r tatology 1987;35:269–75.
59. Kadir RA, Economides DL. Neural tube defects and peri-
conceptional folic acid. Can Med Assoc J 2002;167(3)255–6.
... The CAC in serving, in contrast to the suggested procedure, FDA in serving, CAC in 100 grams, CAC in 100 kilocalories, and some scientific literature (Hung et al. 2006;Robbins et al. 2005;Wilson et al. 2003Wilson et al. , 2007, did not describe broccoli as food containing a suitable folate level. Consumption of 634.9 grams of raw broccoli (NDB number 11090; 63 micrograms of DFE in 100 grams; 34 kilocalories of energy in 100 grams) satisfies the DV or NRV for folate, and that broccoli is customarily consumed 850 grams in 10 eating occasions. ...
Article
Full-text available
Computing the food component (nutrient) amount in 100 kilocalories, 100 grams or 100 milliliters, the reference amount customarily consumed (RACC), or 50 grams of food demonstrates the food component amount of some foods unsuitably. So, selecting some foods based on them may elevate the hazards of some chronic diseases. Computing the food component amount and assessing suitable levels of food components and the nutritional quality according to the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the suggested procedure were implemented on 8,596 food cases, 29 food components, and 25 food categories. Selecting some foods under the FDA and CAC to reach sufficient intakes of positive food components surpassed energy demands. Selecting some foods under the CAC did not satisfy the demands of positive food components. Some foods that satisfied the demands of positive food components were not suitable food selections under the CAC. Selecting some foods under the FDA or CAC surpassed the demands of negative food components (including cholesterol, energy, fat, saturated fat, and sodium). Some foods that did not surpass the demands of negative food components were not suitable food selections under the CAC or FDA. Due to the vulnerabilities of selecting foods on the basis of the reference amounts of food, fast foods under the CAC and FDA in serving size (the serving size or serving is obtained from the RACC), spices and herbs under the CAC in 100 grams or 100 milliliters, and vegetables and vegetable products under the CAC in 100 kilocalories obtained the highest average scores for nutritional quality based on positive food components (including vitamins, protein, dietary fiber, and minerals, excluding sodium) among food categories for children aged four years and older and adults.
... interconnection between low parental folate intake and neural tube defects or paediatric malignancy was among the first in setting out a scene for a periconceptional nutrition-for-children health framework (Rayburn et al., 1996;Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment, 2007;Toren et al., 1996;Wilson et al., 2003), yet several other critical dietary factors identified via either human or preclinical studies could be associated with ill health in the next generation. ...
Article
Full-text available
Key messages Nutrition can modulate normal periconception and subsequent well‐being, yet we still lack a fundamental understanding of the main metabolic networks involved in nutritional biology of this sensitive time frame. Besides one‐carbon metabolism, arguably a key regulatory network affected by periconceptional nutrition, several other nutrition‐related intracellular signals are recognised as important to support normal periconception, including high‐energy phosphate metabolism, gut microbiota‐driven factors, peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptors, adiponectine, mechanistic target of rapamycin and retinol‐binding protein‐4. To advance research related to molecular nutrition and periconception, the scientific community must embrace the theranostics approach in research planning and knowledge translation, and monitor additional target molecules and pathways.
... Daily folic acid supplementation should be initiated before conception and taken during the first 12 gestational weeks to reduce the risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring of women with diabetes and the intake should preferably begin while planning pregnancy [80]. There is no consensus on the dose of folic acid, and recommended doses range from 400 µg/day to 5 mg/day [28,81]. ...
Article
Full-text available
In women with type 1 diabetes, the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including congenital anomalies, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, foetal overgrowth and perinatal death is 2–4-fold increased compared to the background population. This review provides the present evidence supporting recommendations for the diet during pregnancy and breastfeeding in women with type 1 diabetes. The amount of carbohydrate consumed in a meal is the main dietary factor affecting the postprandial glucose response. Excessive gestational weight gain is emerging as another important risk factor for foetal overgrowth. Dietary advice to promote optimized glycaemic control and appropriate gestational weight gain is therefore important for normal foetal growth and pregnancy outcome. Dietary management should include advice to secure sufficient intake of micro- and macronutrients with a focus on limiting postprandial glucose excursions, preventing hypoglycaemia and promoting appropriate gestational weight gain and weight loss after delivery. Irrespective of pre-pregnancy BMI, a total daily intake of a minimum of 175 g of carbohydrate, mainly from low-glycaemic-index sources such as bread, whole grain, fruits, rice, potatoes, dairy products and pasta, is recommended during pregnancy. These food items are often available at a lower cost than ultra-processed foods, so this dietary advice is likely to be feasible also in women with low socioeconomic status. Individual counselling aiming at consistent timing of three main meals and 2–4 snacks daily, with focus on carbohydrate amount with pragmatic carbohydrate counting, is probably of value to prevent both hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia. The recommended gestational weight gain is dependent on maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and is lower when BMI is above 25 kg/m2. Daily folic acid supplementation should be initiated before conception and taken during the first 12 gestational weeks to minimize the risk of foetal malformations. Women with type 1 diabetes are encouraged to breastfeed. A total daily intake of a minimum of 210 g of carbohydrate is recommended in the breastfeeding period for all women irrespective of pre-pregnancy BMI to maintain acceptable glycaemic control while avoiding ketoacidosis and hypoglycaemia. During breastfeeding insulin requirements are reported approximately 20% lower than before pregnancy. Women should be encouraged to avoid weight retention after pregnancy in order to reduce the risk of overweight and obesity later in life. In conclusion, pregnant women with type 1 diabetes are recommended to follow the general dietary recommendations for pregnant and breastfeeding women with special emphasis on using carbohydrate counting to secure sufficient intake of carbohydrates and to avoid excessive gestational weight gain and weight retention after pregnancy.
... Insufficient knowledge of deficiencies of potential mothers can lead to delayed interventions. The study determined the knowledge of maternal lesions among pregnant women in relation to their sociodemographic profile [1]. Most reports of mothers with a two-handed uterus analyze fertility, reproductive capacity, and pregnancy outcomes. ...
Article
Full-text available
One of the major factors contributing to the increased risk can lead to infant mortality is Congenital anomalies Almost 70% of infants die during first month of birth. It is observed that 30-40% of congenital malformation is genetic. The babies of consanguineous parents are at a greater risk of a host of disease like cancer, mental disorders, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, asthma hypertension, hearing deficit, leukemia, beta thalasemia, congenital and non congenital heart disease. There is need for parents education related to risk factors for delivery of baby with congenital anomalies. Current study was planned with aim to assess the pre existing knowledge regarding Congenital Anomalies from selected community area to evaluate the effectiveness of planned teaching programme related to prevention of Congenital Anomalies among Newly Married couples. The Sampling technique used was probability simple random sampling technique with 70 newly married couples. Structured questionnaire as a tool was used to collect the data and the result revealed that the calculated 'p' value is 0.0001 i.e., it is highly significant as the p value which is less than 0.005.which reveals that there is increase in the knowledge score after planned teaching programme. Hence the planned teaching programme was effective.
Chapter
Sprouting of peas convert it into digestible form and provides numerous nutritional benefits. In this process, various changes take place from the dormant stage to the germination. So, sprouts are young plants or edible seeds which germinates and grow for a shorter period. Sprouts needs water for their germination instead of soil. These are known as powerhouse of nutrition that are mostly used for human consumption. In this chapter, the theoretical background explained the sprouting process of all pea types, their improved the nutritional value, reduced anti-nutritional factors health benefits, sprouting effect on the original and nutritional composition of the seed and food safety concerns.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Introduction: Birth defects are a significant concern since they can lead to permanent disability and death. This study comprehensively reviews the prevalence and patterns of birth defects in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A systematic analysis of the literature retrieved from three databases (Pub Med, Science Direct, and the Saudi digital library) published between 1989 and 2022 was performed. Observational studies that addressed the prevalence and patterns of birth defects in Saudi Arabia were chosen based on the eligibility criteria, while systematic reviews, review articles, non-relevant articles, and studies that did not fulfill the eligibility criteria were excluded. Quality and risk of bias were evaluated based on the JBI and GRADE tools, respectively. Results: We identified 26 eligible publications of 1277 records that included 297,668 patients from different regions of Saudi Arabia. The highest overall prevalence of birth defects was 46.5 per 1000 live births compared to a lowest rate of 8.6 per 1000 in one study. Several studies have reported positive associations of consanguinity, maternal folic acid supplementation, family history of birth defects or genetic abnormalities, and maternal co-morbidities. The most frequent birth defects include cardiac, genitourinary, craniofacial, and nervous system defects. Conclusion: Robust findings have improved our understanding of the prevalence and pattern of birth defects in Saudi Arabia. Importantly, future studies will likely require multicenter collaboration to arrive at appropriate sample sizes in the context of the effects of risk factors on elevated prevalence. Furthermore, quantitative data require careful evaluation in more complex statistical models.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Folate deficiency is associated with poor pregnancy outcomes and is one of the most common vitamin deficiencies in women, especially those of reproductive age. Folic acid intake prior to, and during, the first months of pregnancy significantly reduces the risk of fetal neural tube defects.Maternal folate status has been associated with other adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, malformations (orofacial clefts, Neural tube defects, anencephaly and encephalocele resulting from incomplete neural tube closure during early embryogenesis), spontaneous abortion, fetal death, fetal growth restriction and preterm delivery. Methods: The study embraced a cross-sectional study that assess Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of preconceptional folic acid supplementation among pregnant women (18-45years) attending antenatal clinic in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State. 152 women attending antenatal clinics in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Ebonyi State were interviewed using structured questionnaire. Data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 21 for frequency and percentage at P < 0.05 significance level. Results: 98.7% of the participants had heard about folic acid, but an analysis of data shows that 26.6% of them knew that folic acid is a vitamin. In addition, very few (29.6%) knew that folic acid could prevent neural tube defects. The main source of information about folic acid supplementation among the surveyed women were through the health workers. Incidence of at least one episode of adverse pregnancy outcome was noted in about 35.5% of the population under study though a majority indicated the form for their loss were miscarriage and stillbirth. Finding showed that 37.5% of the respondent claimed to have used folic acid before pregnancy while 40.1% of the women in this study were aware of the right time to start using folic acid. 46% of the women took folic acid during Antenatal care and their reason were attributed to late presentation for antenatal care, delayed prescription of the folic acid for women during pregnancy, unplanned pregnancy while others claimed they are getting enough folate from food. Approximately 40.8% of the respondents had started supplementation on antenatal booking and from analysis of data on the preferred/normal booking time of the respondents it shows that a high percentage of them attended antenatal from the third month of pregnancy this shows that the majority of the respondents started supplementation too late which is inconsistent with the ideal time to start folic acid supplementation in prevention of neural tube defect. In this study it has been revealed that 48% of the respondents could identify green leafy vegetable as the only source of folate in local foods and 0.7% could identify other food sources like legumes and fruits as sources of folate. Conclusion: There is a low overall level of awareness of folic acid among pregnant women including lack of understanding of its natural sources, usefulness in preventing Neural Tube Defects and preconceptional intake recommendation. Health education regarding the preconceptional use of folic acid among women of reproductive age is recommended.
Article
Background: With the goal of preventing open neural tube defects (NTDs), recommendations for folic acid supplementation before conception were introduced in Canada in 1994, and by November 1998 Canadian grain products were being fortified with folic acid. We wished to determine whether the annual incidence of open NTDs in Nova Scotia, including those in stillbirths and terminated pregnancies, changed after the introduction of either folic acid supplementation or fortification. Methods: For the 10-year period from Jan. 1, 1991, to Dec. 31, 2000, we retrospectively extracted the total number of births in Nova Scotia and the number of live births and stillbirths with open NTDs from the Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database as well as the number of terminated pregnancies affected by NTDs from the Fetal Anomaly Database. We determined the total annual incidence of all open NTDs, and of the subgroups spina bifida and anencephaly, per 1000 births in the province during the periods before (1991-1994) and after (1995-1998) folic acid supplementation initiatives were begun but before folic acid fortification of grain products was implemented, and during the periods before (1991-1997) and after (1998-2000) fortification. Results: In the period after supplementation initiatives were begun but before fortification was implemented, the incidence of open NTDs did not change significantly: the mean annual rate was 2.55 per 1000 births during 1991-1994 and 2.61 per 1000 births during 1995-1997 (relative risk [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.35). After the fortification was implemented the incidence of open NTDs decreased by more than 50%: the mean annual rate was 2.58 per 1000 births during 1991-1997 and 1.17 per 1000 births during 1998-2000 (relative risk 0.46, 95% CI 0.32-0.66). Interpretation: The recommendations for folic acid supplementation alone did not appear to succeed in reducing the incidence of open NTDs in Nova Scotia, whereas the fortification of grain products with folic acid did result in a significant reduction in the incidence.
Article
We studied the association between multivitamin use during the periconceptional period and the occurrence of neural tube defects using data from the Atlanta Birth Defects Case-Control Study. There were 347 babies with neural tube defects who were live born or stillborn to residents of metropolitan Atlanta from 1968 through 1980. The 2829 control-babies born without birth defects were randomly selected through birth certificates. Periconceptional multivitamin use was defined as reported use for each of the three months before conception through the first three months of pregnancy. Mothers who reported not using multivitamins any time during the six-month period were defined as nonusers. Fourteen percent of mothers reported periconceptional multivitamin use and 40% reported nonuse. Multivitamin users were different from nonusers in a number of demographic, health-related, and life-style characteristics. We found an overall apparent protective effect of periconceptional multivitamin use on the occurrence of neural tube defects, with a crude estimated relative risk of 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.63). At this time, it is not possible to determine whether this apparently lower risk is the direct result of multivitamin use or the result of other characteristics of women who use multivitamins. (JAMA 1988;260:3141-3145)
Article
We examined the relation of multivitamin intake in general, and folic acid in particular, to the risk of neural tube defects in a cohort of 23 491 women undergoing maternal serum α-fetoprotein screening or amniocentesis around 16 weeks of gestation. Complete questionnaires and subsequent pregnancy outcome information was obtained in 22 776 pregnancies, 49 of which ended in a neural tube defect. The prevalence of neural tube defect was 3.5 per 1000 among women who never used multivitamins before or after conception or who used multivitamins before conception only. The prevalence of neural tube defects for women who used folic acid-containing multivitamins during the first 6 weeks of pregnancy was substantially lower—0.9 per 1000 (prevalence ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.59 compared with never users). For women who used multivitamins without folic acid during the first 6 weeks of pregnancy and women who used multivitamins containing folic acid beginning after 7 or more weeks of pregnancy, the prevalences were similar to that of the nonusers and the prevalence ratios were close to 1.0. (JAMA. 1989;262:2847-2852)
Article
3 Health agencies and professional societies concerned with obstetrics and children's health have recommended that all women of childbearing age take a daily supplement of folic acid, 4-6 especially because 50% of pregnancies in North America are mistimed or unplanned. However, studies 7-9 have found that less than 30% of women who at- tend their first prenatal clinic have taken extra folic acid be- fore conception or early in pregnancy when the neural tube closes (i.e., 2 weeks after the first missed menstrual period). Moreover, James House and colleagues 10 (see page 1557 in this issue) report that 5 years after this important informa- tion about folate's protective effects became available and recommendations were broadly publicized, more than 25% of women in Newfoundland who attended their first prena- tal clinic had serum folate levels that were low enough to be of concern. At least 5% of babies are born with some serious con- genital anomaly. 11 Although publicity to increase awareness and prevent birth defects has focused on folic acid intake and neural tube defects, several studies suggest that taking multivitamins containing folic acid during the periconcep- tional period can reduce the risk of other conditions such as congenital heart defects,