Content uploaded by Igor Fadeev
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Igor Fadeev on Dec 23, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2638
, 545-551271 2004 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B
Karagodin, Evgeniy A. Koblik and Yaroslav A. Red'kin
Sergei V. Drovetski, Robert M. Zink, Sievert Rohwer, Igor V. Fadeev, Evgeniy V. Nesterov, Igor
Complex biogeographic history of a Holarctic passerine
Supplementary data
l
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/suppl/2009/02/12/271.1538.545.DC1.htm
"Data Supplement"
References
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/271/1538/545#related-urls
Article cited in:
Email alerting service
hereright-hand corner of the article or click
Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions go to: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. BTo subscribe to
This journal is © 2004 The Royal Society
on May 24, 2011rspb.royalsocietypublishing.orgDownloaded from
Received 26 September 2003
Accepted 4 November 2003
Published online 21 January 2004
Complex biogeographic history of a Holarctic
passerine
Sergei V. Drovetski
1*
, Robert M. Zink
1,2
, Sievert Rohwer
3
, Igor V. Fadeev
4
,
Evgeniy V. Nesterov
4
, Igor Karagodin
4
†, Evgeniy A. Koblik
5
and Yaroslav A. Red’kin
5
1
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, and
2
Bell Museum, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology Building,
1987 Upper Buford Circle, St Paul, MN 55108, USA
3
Burke Museum and Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-3010, USA
4
State Darwin Museum, 57 Vavilova Street, Moscow 117292, Russia
5
Zoological Museum, Moscow State University, Bol’shaya Nikitskaya Street 6, Moscow, 103009 Russia
Our analysis of the ND2 sequences revealed six clades within winter wrens (Troglodytes troglodytes). These
clades corresponded to six geographical regions: western Nearctic, eastern Nearctic, eastern Asia, Nepal,
Caucasus and Europe, and differed by 3–8.8% of sequence divergence. Differences among regions
explained 96% of the sequence variation in winter wren. Differences among individuals within localities
explained 3% of the sequence variation, and differences among localities within regions explained 1%.
Grouping sequences into subspecies instead of localities did not change these proportions. Proliferation
of the six clades coincided with Early and Middle Pleistocene glaciations. The distribution of winter wren
clades can be explained by a series of five consecutive vicariant events. Western Nearctic wrens diverged
from the Holarctic ancestor 1.6 Myr before the present time (MYBP). Eastern Nearctic and Palaearctic
wrens diverged 1 MYBP. Eastern and western Palaearctic birds diverged 0.83 MYBP. Nepalese and east
Asian wrens diverged 0.67 MYBP, and Caucasian birds diverged from European wrens 0.54 MYBP. The
winter wren has a much greater degree of inter- and intracontinental differentiation than the three other
Holarctic birds studied to date—dunlin (Calidris alpina), common raven (Corvus corax) and three-toed
woodpecker (Picoides trydactylus)—and represents an example of cryptic speciation that has been overlooked.
Keywords: winter wren; biogeography; phylogeography; speciation; vicariance; Holarctic
1. INTRODUCTION
Very little is known about the phylogeographic structure
of avian Holarctic species. Zink et al. (1995) surveyed 13
species inhabiting both Eurasia and North America and
found that 11 species showed at least some degree of intra-
specific differentiation in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)
between continents. Only three studies addressed large-
scale phylogeography of Holarctic avian taxa. Wenink et
al. (1996) found three distinct mitochondrial clades of
dunlin (Calidris alpina) corresponding to three large geo-
graphical regions: Europe, Canadian Arctic and
Siberia/Alaska. The latter was subdivided into three sub-
clades: west Siberian, east Siberian and Alaskan. The
Canadian clade was the most distantly related to the other
two clades and differed from them by 3.3% of uncorrected
sequence divergence of the most variable domains, I and
II of the mitochondrial control region (CRI and CRII;
Wenink et al. 1996). Omland et al. (2000) found no differ-
entiation in mtDNA between common ravens (Corvus
corax) from Eurasia and North America. However, birds
from western North America, south of the Canadian bor-
der, formed a distinct clade that was the sister to the Chi-
*
Author and address for correspondence: Department of Biological
Sciences, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive,
Anchorage, AK 99508, USA (svd@uaa.alaska.edu).
† Present address: Igor’s Taxidermy, 2931 S. Main Street, suite D, Santa
Ana, CA 92707, USA.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004) 271, 545–551 545 2004 The Royal Society
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2003.2638
huahua raven (C. cryptoleucus), and was well differentiated
from the Holarctic raven (2.69% of uncorrected diver-
gence in the cytochrome b gene and 2.14% in CRI; calcu-
lated from Omland et al. (2000), Table 1). By contrast,
mtDNA of three-toed woodpeckers (Picoides tridactylus)
from Eurasia and North America differed by ca.4%
despite the lack of phylogenetic structure within conti-
nents (Zink et al. 2002). Both the common raven and the
three-toed woodpecker are uniformly distributed across
boreal regions of both continents.
Unlike the dunlin, which inhabits primarily arctic tun-
dra, but similar to the common raven and three-toed
woodpecker, the winter wren (Troglodytes troglodytes)is
widely distributed across the temperate zone of the Hol-
arctic. However, in both continents it is widely distributed
in a north–south direction only in the eastern and western
parts of the continents. In the middle of both continents,
its distribution has large gaps. In the Nearctic, the eastern
and western parts of the range are connected by a narrow
strip of habitat extending across Manitoba, Saskatchewan
and Alberta. In the Palaearctic, the eastern and western
parts of the range are separated by a narrow gap between
south-central and extreme eastern Turkmenistan
(Brewer 2001).
This distribution pattern and sedentary/limited
migration lifestyle of winter wren could result in genetic
differentiation at different scales, namely within and
between continents. The winter wren is one of the most
complex and phenotypically diverse taxa. Brewer (2001)
on May 24, 2011rspb.royalsocietypublishing.orgDownloaded from
546 S. V. Drovetski and others Biogeography of a Holarctic passerine
listed 39 subspecies, and noted that many more were
described in the Nearctic. The majority of winter wren
subspecific designations are based on slight variations of
plumage coloration and intensity of underbody barring.
Some geographically proximate subspecies of winter wren
form groups that are distinguished by their appearance
and vocalization. In the Nearctic, there are three pheno-
typically distinct groups: eastern, western and
Alaska/Aleutian (Pyle 1997; National Geographic Society
1999). In the Palaearctic, eastern Asian winter wrens dif-
fer from European and western and central Asian birds by
much darker brown plumage (Stepanyan 2003). Interest-
ingly, birds from the western Nearctic and eastern Asia,
and birds from the eastern Nearctic and Europe, are more
similar in appearance to each other than to birds from
opposite sides of their respective continents.
The complex geographical pattern of phenotypic vari-
ation has fostered much confusion about the evolutionary
and biogeographic history of the winter wren. Although a
generally accepted hypothesis suggests that the Palaearctic
was colonized by the western Nearctic birds through the
Bering Strait (Brewer 2001), alternative hypotheses were
proposed by several authors. For example, Hejl et al.
(2002) suggested separate invasions of the Palaearctic by
both eastern and western Nearctic winter wrens (Hejl et
al. 2002). Interestingly, all of these hypotheses are based
on dispersal scenarios, and none considers vicariance.
Some authors argue that because any distribution pattern
can be explained by numerous, equally parsimonious dis-
persal hypotheses, vicariance should be ruled out first, and
dispersal should be invoked when vicariance fails to
explain observed distribution patterns (Ronquist 1997).
We present data on large-scale phylogeographic pat-
terns in the Holarctic winter wren, and compare popu-
lation genetics parameters among localities with relatively
large sample sizes. We also discuss the historical biogeog-
raphy of winter wren and use dispersal–vicariance analysis
(DIVA; Ronquist 1996, 1997) to determine if vicariance
alone is sufficient to explain the observed geographical
structuring of winter wren haplotypes.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
A total of 97 winter wren samples were obtained from 24
localities across the Holarctic (figure 1). We also used 16 indi-
viduals of 14 wren species as outgroups (electronic Appendix A;
available on The Royal Society’s Publications Web site).
Total genomic DNA was extracted from frozen or 96% etha-
nol-preserved tissue samples using a QIAamp Tissue Kit
(QIAGEN Inc.). Each individual complete mitochondrial ND2
gene (1041 bp) was amplified with Perkin-Elmer PCR reagents
and primers L5215 (Hackett 1996) and H1064 (CTTTGA
AGGCCTTCGGTTTA, designed by S.V.D.). The PCR frag-
ments were sequenced directly on an ABI-3700 sequencer.
Sequences were aligned automatically by Sequencher 3.1.1
(Gene Codes Corporation). The alignment did not require edit-
ing because there were no indels in the ND2 sequences. A
maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis was performed
using PAUP
∗
(Swofford 1998). ML model and parameters were
determined by the hierarchical likelihood ratio test (hLRT) in
Modeltest 3.06 (Posada & Crandall 1998). Taxa were added
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004)
randomly for both ML and its bootstrap analysis (100
replicates). Population genetics parameters were calculated in
Arlequin 2.000 (Schneider et al. 2000). DIVA (Ronquist 1996,
1997) with its default settings was used for reconstruction of the
biogeographic history of winter wren.
3. RESULTS
(a) Geographical structuring of winter wren
haplotypes
The initial phylogenetic analysis (results not shown)
indicated that winter wrens are most closely related to
marsh (Cistothorus palustris) and sedge (C. platensis) wrens
than to the other outgroup species (electronic Appendix
A), including two members of Troglodytes: northern house
wren (T. aedon) and mountain wren (T. solstitialis). There-
fore, we used marsh and sedge wrens as outgroups for the
phylogenetic analysis of winter wren haplotypes.
Among 97 individuals of winter wren, 51 unique haplo-
types were distinguished based on 126 variable sites (120
transitions and nine transversions). The hLRT selected
the TrN⫹G model (Posada & Crandall 1998) for com-
plete ND2 sequences of winter, marsh and sedge wrens.
The TrN⫹G is a submodel of the general time reversible
(GTR) model (Rodrı
´
guez et al. 1990) in which transver-
sions are weighted equally and the discrete-gamma model
of substitution rates across sites (Yang 1994) is included.
Guanine was under-represented and cytosine was
over-represented in ND2 sequences (A = 30.08%,
C = 39.62%, G = 10.26%, T = 20.04%; G-test p = 0.0110).
All taxa shared this nucleotide bias and there was no evi-
dence of heterogeneity of base composition among taxa.
GenBank accession numbers for ND2 sequences are
AY460221–AY460333.
The ML analysis of wren haplotypes resulted in a
single tree. The molecular clock assumption for this tree
was not rejected (⫺ln L without molecular clock
enforced = 3092.786 33, ⫺ln L with molecular clock
enforced = 3124.447 44; ⫺2⌬ln L = 63.322 22, d.f. = 51,
p = 0.1154). Winter wren haplotypes formed six geo-
graphically concordant clades (figure 2). These clades cor-
responded to six major geographical regions: Europe,
Caucasus, Nepal (central Asia), eastern Asia, eastern
Nearctic and western Nearctic (figure 1). Each clade was
supported by bootstrap values of greater than or equal to
78%. The relationships among these clades, however,
were not strongly supported except for the sister-group
relationship of Caucasian and European clades, which
received 94% bootstrap support (figure 2).
The Palaearctic clades were divided into two pairs of
sister clades: the east Asian clade and a single haplotype
from Nepal (3.7% ML divergence between clades exclud-
ing intraclade variation), and European and Caucasian
clades (3.0% ML divergence). The ML divergence
between these pairs was 4.6%. Palaearctic birds were more
closely related to the eastern Nearctic clade (5.6% ML
divergence) than to the western Nearctic clade (8.8% ML
divergence), so the two Nearctic clades were not sisters.
Conversion of the node depths (excluding intraclade vari-
ation; figure 2) into million years before the present time
(MYBP) using an ND2 molecular clock calibration for
on May 24, 2011rspb.royalsocietypublishing.orgDownloaded from
Biogeography of a Holarctic passerine S. V. Drovetski and others 547
0
3
6
9
12
15
1
4
2
4
14
eastern
Asia
Europe
Caucasus 10
1
1
western
Nearctic
Ontario 4
MN 9
MI 2
ME 1
5
eastern
Nearctic
Nepal
1
Buryatiya 1
Khabarovsk
Sakhalin
Honshu
Moscow 5
Greece 1
Germany
GB
6
Attu
Adak
1
AK 2
WA16
NY 4
NC
MA 1
NJ 1
St Paul
Switzerland
V1
V5
V3
V4
V2
Minnesota
p = 0.275
10
20
30
40
50
Honshu
p = 0.030
0
3
6
9
12
15
Caucasus
p = 0.404
0
10
20
30
40
Washington
p = 0.245
0123
12345 6
1234
1234567
Figure 1. Geographical regions, localities, sample sizes and mismatch distributions. Vicariant events are labelled with the letter
‘V’ and their consecutive number. Mismatch distributions: x-axis, number of pairwise differences; y-axis, observations. Solid
lines, observed distributions; dashed lines, expected distributions; vertical lines, mean mismatch. The p-values are for the
differences from expectation of sudden population expansion.
Galapagos mocking birds (0.0276 substitutions per site
per lineage Myr
⫺1
; B. S. Arbogast, P. T. Boag, G. Seutin,
P. R. Grant, B. R. Grant, S. V. Drovetski, R. Curry and
D. J. Anderson, unpublished data) indicated that winter
wrens radiated into the six lineages in Early–Middle Pleis-
tocene. The western Nearctic clade diverged from the
common ancestor of the other winter wren clades first, ca.
1.6 MYBP. The eastern Nearctic birds diverged from the
common ancestor of the Palaearctic clades ca. 1 MYBP.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004)
Eastern and western Palaearctic winter wrens diverged
0.83 MYBP. East Asian birds and Himalayan birds
diverged 0.67 MYBP, and Caucasian and European birds
diverged last, 0.54 MYBP. Although sedge and marsh
wrens may not be the closest relatives of the winter wren,
divergence between the common ancestors of these two
lineages occurred 13 MYBP. Therefore, winter wren
could have existed since the Middle Miocene, long before
the radiation of the six current clades.
on May 24, 2011rspb.royalsocietypublishing.orgDownloaded from
548 S. V. Drovetski and others Biogeography of a Holarctic passerine
iuk263, svd1703, 1945, 2005
svd1999
svd2111
svd1774
svd1957
svd1966
svd1775
t437
svd2659, pac573
jk95019
svd2630
svd2850
grg3764
grg3765
grg3767
svd2383
evl295, sar7443, t1241, svd2382, 2844,
2848, grg3763, prs309,
1b2816-2819
svd2631, 2849
grg3766, prs235,
x7368
ksw2720, rwd24877
stp1
ksw1388, t713, gfb3209, 3217, mgs65,
svd1241, 2195, wlk37
cds4171
evl79
wlk49
gav903
nam255
svd2196
csw6240
svd2389
gav305
plg56
0.0146
0.0279
0.0434
western
Nearctic
eastern
Nearctic
Caucasus
00. 51. 01.5
96
78
99
Cistothorus palustris (sar7250)
C. platensis (ksw694, sdw50)
gav225
vm217
vm218
tt6, 7
tt3, 10, 12-13, 17-18, vm248
tt1, 11
tt4, 15
tt16
ty175
bks1020
svd297
tt2
jgg1149
db99.471
db00.127
ansp5325
9/23/02, db02.63, db99.64, b13472, rya,
bey98-99, iuk114, vm395,
svd2628, x8237, 8248, 8251
0.1185
0.2521
0.2521
0.3248
0.0164
0.0053
0.0047
0.0176
0.0194
0.0077
0.0153
Europe
Nepal
eastern
Asia
100
47
54
94
42
79
98
b8855
Myr
Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood tree of unique haplotypes. Sample numbers are listed at the tips (for localities and subspecies
see electronic Appendix A). Numbers next to branches indicate ML bootstrap values (100 replicates with random addition of
taxa) and branch lengths (substitution/site).
Using PAUP
∗
we calculated average ML pairwise dif-
ferences among haplotypes within clades and their stan-
dard deviations (± s.d.). They were 0.34 ± 0.16% for the
western Nearctic, 0.26 ± 0.11% for the eastern Nearctic,
0.30 ± 0.14% for eastern Asia, 0.20 ± 0.08% for Europe
and 0.27 ± 0.11% for Caucasus.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA; Excoffier et
al. 1992) indicated that most of the sequence variation
was due to differences among the six geographical regions.
Differences among individuals within populations
accounted for 3% of the sequence variation, differences
among localities within regions accounted for 1% of the
sequence variation, and differences among geographical
regions accounted for 96% of the sequence variation.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004)
Grouping of haplotypes by subspecies rather than by
localities did not change the AMOVA results.
(b) Population genetics and demography of the
winter wren
Only one of the 11 localities with a sample size of four
or more had a marginally significant Tajima’s D-value
(Tajima 1989) indicating that the selective neutrality
assumption is appropriate for the evolution of ND2
sequences of winter wren (table 1).
The ML nucleotide diversity varied from 0 to 0.0029
(table 1). All European populations had very low nucleo-
tide diversities. British wrens were more genetically
diverse than birds from continental Europe, where 10
on May 24, 2011rspb.royalsocietypublishing.orgDownloaded from
Biogeography of a Holarctic passerine S. V. Drovetski and others 549
Table 1. Tajima’s p-values, age, nucleotide diversity based on ML (ML
n
) and on infinite site model (
n
), and their standard
deviations (s.d.) for populations with n ⭓ 4.
Tajima’s
locality npage (MYBP) ML
n
s.d.
n
s.d.
WA 16 0.047 0.038 0.002 104 0.001 642 0.002 017 0.001 330
MN 9 0.248 0.032 0.001 771 0.000 885 0.001 708 0.001 233
NY 4 0.284 0.018 0.000 968 0.000 617 0.000 961 0.000 952
Ontario 4 1.000 0.000 0.000 000 0.000 000 0.000 000 0.000 000
NC 5 0.079 0.051 0.002 835 0.001 383 0.002 690 0.001 986
Sakhalin Is. 4 0.739 0.052 0.002 870 0.001 560 0.002 722 0.002 147
Japan 14 0.177 0.019 0.001 041 0.000 669 0.001 035 0.000 813
GB 6 0.089 0.024 0.001 308 0.000 968 0.001 281 0.001 059
Moscow 5 1.000 0.000 0.000 000 0.000 000 0.000 000 0.000 000
Switzerland 4 1.000 0.000 0.000 000 0.000 000 0.000 000 0.000 000
Caucasus 10 0.266 0.037 0.002 043 0.001 264 0.001 964 0.001 358
birds from Switzerland, Germany and the Moscow region
shared a single haplotype. An application of the ND2 mol-
ecular clock indicates that all localities, except the three
localities covered by ice sheets (Ontario, Moscow and
Switzerland), were colonized by winter wrens before or
during the Last Glacial Cold Stage 0.021–0.017 MYBP
(Adams 2002). The three glaciated localities had all indi-
viduals sharing the same haplotype (figure 2), indicating
a very recent colonization of these areas by winter wrens.
The nucleotide diversity based on infinite site model
(
n
) was slightly lower than nucleotide diversity based on
ML corrected distances (ML
n
). However, the values
were strongly correlated (Y = 1.733 × 10
⫺5
⫹ 0.950 × X;
d.f. = 10, r
2
= 1, p ⬍ 0.0001).
Mismatch distributions were calculated for four
localities that had a sample size of nine or more (Japan,
Caucasus, Minnesota and Washington; figure 1). All four
localities were at similar latitudes 43°–48° N. Mismatch
distributions for Caucasus, Minnesota and Washington
had similar mean mismatch values and did not differ sig-
nificantly from the expectation of recent demographic
expansion (Slatkin & Hudson 1991; Rogers & Harpending
1992). By contrast, the mismatch distribution for the
Honshu sample differed significantly from that expected,
despite its apparent unimodality and its mean mismatch
value, which was half of each of the other three sample
values.
(c) Dispersal–vicariance analysis and area
relationships
DIVA (Ronquist 1996, 1997) indicated that vicariance
alone is sufficient to explain the current distribution of
winter wren clades, and no dispersal has to be invoked.
According to DIVA reconstruction, the ancestral popu-
lation of winter wrens was widespread across the Holarc-
tic. The first divergence resulted from western Nearctic
birds separating from the Holarctic ancestor, presumably
because they were isolated in a southern area of western
North America at a time when Holarctic populations of
wrens were still exchanging genes across Beringia (figure
1). Consistent with this reconstruction of their early his-
tory is the fact that the songs of European, Japanese and
eastern North American wrens are much more similar to
each other than any of them is to the songs of winter wrens
from Washington and Oregon (Kroodsma & Momose
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004)
1991). This first divergence was followed by the separ-
ation of eastern Nearctic and Palaearctic birds. This
second split is likely to have involved isolation across
Beringia because prior to major Middle Pleistocene glaci-
ations, eastern Nearctic wrens could have occupied an
even larger portion of the northern Nearctic than they do
to date. Within the Palaearctic, the first divergence was
between the wrens of eastern and western Eurasia. Eastern
Palaearctic birds diverged into east Asian and central
Asian (represented by a single individual from Nepal in
our study) clades, and western Palaearctic birds diverged
into Caucasian and European clades (figure 1).
4. DISCUSSION
Our analysis identified six mtDNA clades of winter
wren. This differentiation was geographically structured
and clades corresponded to large geographical regions:
eastern Asia, Nepal (central Asia), Caucasus, Europe,
eastern Nearctic and western Nearctic. The differentiation
among the six clades was 3.0–8.8% of ML nucleotide
divergence. These deep divergences argue for recognition
of the six clades as evolutionarily significant units (Moritz
1994), or even species. Strong differentiation of winter
wren clades and the relationships among them are also
supported by differences in their vocalization
(Kroodsma & Momose 1991).
Virtually all sequence variation in winter wren was
explained by differences among the six regions (96%).
Differences among localities or subspecies within the six
regions explained only 1% of sequence variation. Subspe-
cies were not reciprocally monophyletic and many shared
haplotypes. Thus, subspecific divisions in winter wren do
not reflect the species’ evolutionary history, as found for
many other birds (Zink 2004). Unlike in most other cases,
however, the numerous subspecific divisions in winter
wren have obscured the recognition of deep, species-level,
evolutionary divisions.
Although an ancestral form could have existed since the
Middle Miocene (13 MYBP), proliferation of winter wren
into the six clades coincided with the Early and Middle
Pleistocene glaciations. Late Pleistocene glaciations did
not produce distinct clades, but presumably contributed
to self-pruning of the ND2 haplotype tree. In the localities
that were free of ice during the last glaciation, population
on May 24, 2011rspb.royalsocietypublishing.orgDownloaded from
550 S. V. Drovetski and others Biogeography of a Holarctic passerine
age does not exceed 52 000 years (middle of the previous
interstadial), which is an order of magnitude younger than
the age of the most recent divergence among the clades
(540 000 years).
Mismatch distributions (figure 1) suggested recently
expanding populations, except for the Honshu population,
whose mismatch distribution was significantly different
from that expected for a recently expanding population
despite its unimodal shape and low mean. Northward
expansion during the current interstadial could have
resulted in fragmentation of the southern parts of the spec-
ies’ range and in a loss of genetic variability in Japan
(Hewitt 2000). A recent loss of genetic variability can pro-
duce a unimodal mismatch distribution similar to that of
rapidly expanded populations. The slope of the distri-
bution plot in declining populations, however, is steeper,
especially on the right side of the graph, than in recently
expanded populations (Rogers & Harpending 1992).
Although the Japanese winter wren population appears
stable, our samples are from central Honshu, where wrens
are on the periphery of the core population to the north,
and where they have low breeding success (K. Ueda, per-
sonal communication). The loss of genetic variability in
Japanese winter wren is also supported by the fact that the
population from Daito Islands (800 km south of Kyushu)
recently became extinct and the population from Izu
Islands (just southeast of Honshu) is endangered
(Ministry of the Environment of Japan 1998). Further-
more, nucleotide diversity in Sakhalin Island, to the north
of Hokkaido, is 2.8 times greater than in central Honshu.
Declines in Japanese populations of some other temperate
species are also known. For example, in the 1970s Asian
rosy-finch (Leucosticte arctoa) probably bred in Hokkaido,
where adults and fledglings were observed during the
breeding season, but it no longer appears to breed in Japan
(Brazil 1991).
The current distribution of winter wren clades can be
explained by a sequence of five vicariant events (figure 1)
that were probably caused by Early and Middle Pleisto-
cene glaciations. These glaciations began periodic separ-
ations between the Nearctic and Palaearctic across
Beringia, and between regions within these continents.
Winter wrens could have had over 10 Myr to acquire a
wide Holarctic distribution during the Late Miocene and
Pliocene when the continents were connected across
Beringia and many animals dispersed from one continent
to the other. It is difficult to reconstruct the routes by
which winter wren may have spread throughout the Hol-
arctic because habitat distributions have changed dramati-
cally since the Miocene. For example, mountain ranges
currently inhabited by some clades (e.g. Caucasus,
Himalayas) developed during the Miocene. However,
colonization routes probably had little effect on differen-
tiation of the six clades because these clades seem to have
differentiated from a single, undifferentiated Holarctic
ancestor.
While the six clades discovered with our samples can
readily be explained by vicariance, dispersal may still be
needed to explain some aspects of the distribution of win-
ter wrens. Most obvious are the populations of winter
wrens currently inhabiting Iceland and other islands of the
North Atlantic. These islands could have been colonized
by dispersal from either Europe or the eastern Nearctic.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004)
Samples from these islands, together with larger samples
from eastern North America and Europe, will be needed
to determine the source populations for these coloniza-
tions.
The winter wren appears to differ considerably in phylo-
geographic structure from the other three Holarctic avian
taxa studied to date. It is strongly differentiated within and
between continents and differences among clades are
much greater (almost threefold) than in the dunlin
(Wenink et al. 1996), the common raven (Omland et al.
2000) and the three-toed woodpecker (Zink et al. 2002).
Additional detailed population genetics studies of widely
distributed Holarctic taxa are needed to elucidate whether
these differences among taxa in the degree of intrataxon
differentiation are related to their ecology and dispersal
ability or to their demographic history.
Garrett Eddy sponsored all of the Burke Museum expeditions
to Russia in 1992–2000. D. A. Banin, V. B. Masterov, A. V.
Andreev and many other Russian colleagues provided help
with the logistics of the expeditions. Paul Kester helped with
references on palaeoecology. The majority of tissue samples
for this study came from the University of Washington Burke
Museum, with additional samples supplied by Dr Keisuke
Ueda, Rikkyo University, the University of Minnesota Bell
Museum, the British Natural History Museum, the University
of Michigan Museum of Zoology, the US National Museum
of Natural History, the Royal Ontario Museum, the University
of Alaska Museum, the Louisiana State University Museum
of Natural History, the Moscow State University Zoological
Museum, the American Museum of Natural History, and the
Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. S.V.D. was sup-
ported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Department of
Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota.
Molecular work for this project was funded by Garrett Eddy,
an EEB postdoctoral fellowship to S.V.D., and an NSF grant
DEB 9707496 to R.M.Z. and S.A.R. We are grateful to D.
Parkin and an anonymous reviewer for useful comments on
our manuscript.
REFERENCES
Adams, J. 2002 A quick background to the last ice age. In
Global land environment since the last interglacial. A World
Wide Web publication compiled by J. Adams. Available at:
http://members.cox.net/quaternary/.
Brazil, M. A. 1991 The birds of Japan. Washington, DC: Smith-
sonian Institution Press.
Brewer, D. 2001 Wrens, dippers and thrashers. New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. & Quattro, J. 1992 Analysis of mol-
ecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA
haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA
restriction data. Genetics 131, 479–491.
Hackett, S. J. 1996 Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography
of tanagers in the genus Ramphocelus (Aves). Mol. Phylogenet.
Evol. 5, 368–382.
Hejl, S. J., Holmes, J. A. & Kroodsma, D. 2002 Winter wren:
Troglodytes troglodytes.InThe birds of North America, No. 623
(ed. A. Poole & F. Gill). Washington, DC: American Orni-
thologists’ Union.
Hewitt, G. 2000 The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages.
Nature 405, 907–913.
Kroodsma, D. E. & Momose, E. H. 1991 Songs of the
Japanese population of the winter wren (Troglodytes
troglodytes). Condor 93, 424–432.
Moritz, C. 1994 Defining evolutionarily significant units for
conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 373–375.
on May 24, 2011rspb.royalsocietypublishing.orgDownloaded from
Biogeography of a Holarctic passerine S. V. Drovetski and others 551
Ministry of the Environment 1998 Red list and red data book of
Japan. Online publication of the Ministry of the Environ-
ment of Japan available at: http://www.biodic.go.jp/
english/rdb/rdb e.html.
National Geographic Society 1999 Field guide to the birds of
North America, 3rd edn. Washington, DC: National Geo-
graphic Society.
Omland, K. E., Tarr, C. L., Boarman, W. I., Marzluff, J. M. &
Fleischer, R. C. 2000 Cryptic genetic variation and para-
phyly in ravens. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 2475–2482. (DOI
10.1098/rspb.2000.1308.)
Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. 1998 Modeltest: testing the
model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817–818.
Pyle, P. 1997 Identification guide to North American birds: part
1. Bolinas, CA: State Creek Press.
Rogers, A. R. & Harpending, H. 1992 Population growth
makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differ-
ences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 552–569.
Rodrı
´
guez, F., Oliver, J. F., MarI
´
n, A. & Medina, J. R. 1990
The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J.
Theor. Biol. 142, 485–501.
Ronquist, F. 1996 DIVA version 1.1. Computer program and
manual available by anonymous FTP from Uppsala Univer-
sity (ftp.uu.se or ftp.systbot.uu.se).
Ronquist, F. 1997 Dispersal–vicariance analysis: a new
approach to the quantification of historical biogeography.
Syst. Biol. 46, 195–203.
Schneider, S., Roessli, D. & Excoffier, L. 2000 A
rlequin
v.
2.000: a software for population genetics data analysis. Geneva:
Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva.
Slatkin, M. & Hudson, R. R. 1991 Pairwise comparisons of
mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially
growing populations. Genetics 129, 555–562.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004)
Stepanyan, L. S. 2003 Conspectus of the ornithological fauna of
Russia and adjacent territories (within the borders of the USSR
as a historic region). Moscow: Academkniga.
Swofford,D.L.1998PAUP
∗
: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony
(
∗
and other methods), 4.0 edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Tajima, F. 1989 Statistical method for testing the neutral
mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123,
585–595.
Wenink, P. W., Baker, A. J., Rosner, H.-U. & Tilanus,
M. G. J. 1996 Global mitochondrial DNA phylogeography
of Holarctic breeding dunlins (Calidris alpina). Evolution 50,
313–330.
Yang, Z. 1994 Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation
from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approxi-
mate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39, 306–314.
Zink, R. M. 2004 The role of subspecies in obscuring avian
biological diversity and misleading conservation policy. Proc.
R. Soc. Lond.B271. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2003.2617.) (In
the press.)
Zink, R. M., Rohwer, S., Andreev, A. V. & Dittmann, D. L.
1995 Trans-Beringia comparisons of mitochondrial DNA
differentiation in birds. Condor 97, 639–649.
Zink,R.M.,Rohwer,S.,Drovetski,S.V.,Blackwell-Rago,
R. C. & Farrell, S. L. 2002 Holarctic phylogeography and
species limits of three-toed woodpeckers. Condor 104, 167–170.
As this paper exceeds the maximum length normally permitted, the
authors have agreed to contribute to production costs.
Visit http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk to see an electronic appendix
to this paper.
on May 24, 2011rspb.royalsocietypublishing.orgDownloaded from