ArticlePDF Available

Multiple Myofibromas and an Epidermal Verrucous Nevus in a Child with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common neurocutaneous autosomal dominant genetic disorder affecting primarily tissues derived from the embryonic neural crest. Two hallmark features of NF1 are the wide range of potentially affected tissues and the enormous phenotypic variability of disease traits even among patients from the same family. We present a boy fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for NF1 with two unusual lesions: infantile myofibromatosis and a verrucous epidermal nevus. To our knowledge this association has never been described before.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Case Report
Dermatology 2004;209:223–227
DOI: 10.1159/000079894
Multiple Myofibromas and an
Epidermal Verrucous Nevus in a Child
with Neurofibromatosis Type 1
Sofie De Schepper
a
Sandra Janssens
b
Ludwine Messiaen
b, c
Caroline Van den Broecke
d
Jean-Marie Naeyaert
a
Departments of
a
Dermatology and
b
Medical Genetics, and
d
Pathology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium;
c
Department of Genetics, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Ala., USA
Received: November 26, 2003
Accepted: April 21, 2004
Prof. Dr. Jean-Marie Naeyaert
Department of Dermatology
De Pintelaan 185
BE–9000 Ghent (Belgium)
Tel. +32 9 240 2298, Fax +32 9 240 4996, E-Mail jeanmarie.naeyaert@ugent.be
ABC
Fax + 41 61 306 12 34
E-Mail karger@karger.ch
www.karger.com
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
1018–8665/04/2093–0223$21.00/0
Accessible online at:
www.karger.com/drm
Key Words
Neurofibromatosis type 1
W Myofibroma W
Epidermal nevus
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a com-
mon neurocutaneous autosomal dominant
genetic disorder affecting primarily tissues
derived from the embryonic neural crest.
Two hallmark features of NF1 are the wide
range of potentially affected tissues and the
enormous phenotypic variability of disease
traits even among patients from the same
family. We present a boy fulfilling the diag-
nostic criteria for NF1 with two unusual
lesions: infantile myofibromatosis and a
verrucous epidermal nevus. To our knowl-
edge this association has never been de-
scribed before.
Copyright © 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
Introduction
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an
autosomal dominant neurocutaneous disor-
der with an estimated prevalence of 1 in
3,000–4,000 individuals.
To establish the clinical diagnosis of NF1
at least two of the following NIH criteria [1,
2] must be fulfilled: 6 or more café-au-lait
spots, the greatest diameter of which is 1 5
mm in prepubertal individuals and 1 15 mm
in postpubertal individuals, 2 or more neu-
rofibromas of any type or 1 plexiform neuro-
fibroma, optic pathway glioma, axillary or
inguinal freckling, 2 or more Lisch nodules,
typical skeletal dysplasia (thinning of long
bone cortex with or without pseudarthrosis
or sphenoid wing dysplasia) or a first degree
relative with NF1 by the above criteria.
The causative NF1 gene is localized on
chromosome 17q11.2 and encodes a very
large protein: neurofibromin. The gene is
highly pleiotropic in that there is a diverse
set of manifestations involving various sys-
tems and types of abnormalities that are due
to the gene mutation. Neurofibromin has
homology to the catalytic domain of
GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). Three
genes are embedded in intron 27b and tran-
scribed from the opposite strand of the NF1
gene. Advances in our understanding of the
NF1 gene and its product neurofibromin
have led to an increase in our knowledge of
the phenotypic aspects and natural history of
NF1. However, many aspects remain to be
explained. The disease is fully penetrant, but
there is a high degree of phenotypic variabili-
ty among individuals, even among affected
members of the same family. The mutation
rate of the NF1 gene is extremely high, which
implicates that about half of all NF1 cases
are de novo.
Here we present a little boy who, with
café-au-lait spots, axillary and inguinal
freckling and an optic pathway glioma, met
the diagnostic criteria for NF1. The diagno-
sis was confirmed at the genetic level using
fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH)
analysis of the NF1 gene.
Preceding the NF1 diagnosis, the boy un-
derwent surgical excision of 2 tumors on his
back, with a histopathological diagnosis of
myofibromas. Later he also developed a ver-
rucous epidermal nevus on the right side of
his upper trunk.
To our knowledge this is the first NF1
patient presenting with 2 unusual lesions
(myofibromas and a verrucous epidermal
nevus) of which the relationship to NF1 is
yet to be established.
Case Report
The patient, a 4-year-old male, presented
with 2 deep tumors on his back at the age of
6 weeks (fig. 1). He was the first child of 2
healthy non-consanguineous parents and
was born preterm at 35 weeks of pregnancy
with a birthweight of 2,800 g.
Downloaded by:
University of Alabama, Lister Hill Library
138.26.31.3 - 5/1/2015 7:20:47 PM
224
Dermatology 2004;209:223–227
De Schepper/Janssens/Messiaen/
Van den Broecke/Naeyaert
Fig. 1.
At the age of 6 weeks the boy present-
ed 2 tumors on his upper back.
Fig. 2.
The boy has multiple café-au-lait
spots.
Fig. 3.
Two consecutive excisions of myofi-
bromas left a large atrophic scar on his
shoulder.
Fig. 4.
The pedigree of the boy shows no other cases of NF1 or of
consanguinity. Legend: ) = male, [ = female, open symbols = unaf-
fected, filled symbol = affected, X = sex unknown.
Fig. 5.
· Smooth muscle actin staining of the recurrent tumor at the
age of 6 months. Scale bar = 100 Ìm. Vimentin and calponin also
stained the tumor tissue. Neurofilament, S100 protein and desmin
staining were negative.
The tumors were resected and the histo-
logical examination suggested myofibroma.
Infantile myofibromatosis was suspected
and for this reason an abdominal ultrasound
was performed to exclude internal or visceral
myofibromas. No additional tumors were
found and the boy remained in good health
until the age of 6 months. At that time the 2
tumors re-emerged. They were again re-
sected, resulting in the same histological
diagnosis of myofibroma.
By the age of 13 months the boy present-
ed with numerous café-au-lait spots (fig. 2).
Physical examination at that time showed no
major dysmorphic features, no axillary or
inguinal freckling, no cutaneous or subcuta-
neous neurofibromas and a normal neuro-
motor development. His back displayed a
large atrophic scar resulting from the pre-
vious myofibroma surgery (fig. 3). In view of
the large number of café-au-lait spots a mu-
tation analysis of the NF1 gene was per-
formed using an optimized protein trunca-
tion test, which detects the pathogenic muta-
Downloaded by:
University of Alabama, Lister Hill Library
138.26.31.3 - 5/1/2015 7:20:47 PM
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and
Myofibromas
Dermatology 2004;209:223–227
225
tion in approximately 80% of patients fulfill-
ing the NIH diagnostic criteria [3], as the
first test of choice. The protein truncation
test turned out negative and at that time no
further tests were performed to detect a mis-
sense mutation or total gene deletion. There
was no family history of NF1 (fig. 4).
At the age of 21 months the boy was seen
again with complaints of nausea and vomit-
ing. His head circumference had increased
significantly, from a value around the 50th
percentile to one around the 95th percentile.
An MRI of the brain showed a glioma of the
chiasm and right optical tract. Physical ex-
amination also revealed axillary and ingui-
nal freckling. At that time the boy met the
diagnostic criteria for NF1 and a blood sam-
ple was taken in order to perform the next
steps in the cascade of testing developed [3].
FISH analysis using PACs 926B9 and
1002G3 revealed absence of one copy of the
NF1 gene in 20 metaphases counted.
The diagnosis of NF1 was now finally
established and the optic glioma was closely
observed, with magnetic resonance imaging
and ophthalmologic follow-up every 6
months.
More than 1 year later, at the age of 4
years, the parents noticed a verrucous struc-
ture on the right flank of the child. A verru-
cous epidermal nevus, of which the possible
link with NF1 is yet to be established, was
diagnosed and treated with topical retinoids
in anticipation of possible carbon dioxide
laser treatment.
Discussion
The fluorescence in situ hybridization
(FISH) analysis, using the probes PAC22
(926B9, 5) end of the NF1 gene) and PAC 13
(1002G3, 3) end of the gene), showed no sig-
nal for both probes on 1 copy of chromo-
some 17, confirming the diagnosis of NF1
caused by a total gene deletion.
In NF1 a wide variety of mutation types
have been reported. While the majority of
cases are caused by subtle private mutations
that predict truncation of neurofibromin, an
estimated 5–10% are heterozygous for a
germline deletion, predominantly maternal
in origin, encompassing the 350-kb NF1 lo-
cus [4–8]. Until now, no definite genotype-
phenotype correlations have been found, ex-
cept for a more or less distinct severe pheno-
type associated with deletions of the entire
NF1 gene locus. The features of reported
patients include a large number of dermal
neurofibromas with an earlier age at onset,
developmental delay or mental retardation
and a dysmorphic but not entirely character-
istic facies with hypertelorism, ptosis and/or
a Noonan-like appearance [9–17]. Recently
an elevated risk for the development of ma-
lignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors was
described in NF1 microdeletion patients
[18]. It is unclear how consistently this phe-
notype is actually associated with deletion of
the entire NF1 locus. Families have been
reported in which large deletions segregate
not only with NF1 but also with associated
features of the phenotype [12, 14]. On the
other hand many patients with a severe NF1
phenotype do not have large deletions [10,
16], and large deletions have been observed
in patients without this unusual phenotype
[19]. It is hypothesized that the phenotype
associated with a total gene deletion may be
a consequence of the co-deletion of genes
flanking the NF1 gene and/or of the 3 genes
(EVI2A, EVI2B and OMGP) embedded in
exon 27b [13]. Our patient did not display
the distinct total gene deletion phenotype,
suggesting the influence of modifier loci or
the variation in somatic mutations that may
determine the progression and severity of
the disease in different tissues [20]. He has a
normal neuromotor development, no typical
dysmorphic craniofacial features (except for
a macrocephaly) and no early onset of cuta-
neous neurofibromas.
Some of the NF1 deletion patients may
be at increased risk for connective tissue
abnormalities and/or neoplasms, possibly
caused by deletion of an unknown gene in
the NF1 region, which may affect tumor ini-
tiation or development.
At the age of 6 weeks our patient devel-
oped 2 deep nodules in the shoulder region, 1
situated paravertebral and the other more
towards the right scapula. The tumors were
surgically excised and microscopic and im-
munohistochemical studies revealed a diag-
nosis of myofibroma (fig. 5).
A few months later local recurrence of
the 2 tumors occurred. Re-excision was per-
formed with curative results. The recurrence
rate of myofibromas is reported to be as high
as 7–10% but spontaneous resolution of the
tumors has also been described [21].
Infantile myofibromatosis is one of the
most common types of soft-tissue tumors of
infancy and early childhood. It can present
as solitary or multiple lesions, most com-
monly situated in the head and neck region
and shoulder girdle [22]. Visceral tumors
have also been observed in multicentric
form. More than half of the cases of infantile
myofibromatosis appear at or soon after
birth. Most lesions are (sub)cutaneous but
deeper intramuscular, intraosseous or viscer-
al tumors are possible. The lesions are sug-
gested to originate from the myofibroblast
[21–23].
To our knowledge the association of NF1
and myofibromas has never been reported.
There have, however, been several reports
concerning the association of granular cell
tumors [24–27], originally called ‘granular
cell myoblastomas’ by Abrikossoff in his
original description in 1926 [28], and NF1
[29–32]. In addition the malignant rhabdo-
myosarcomas, usually of skeletal muscle ori-
gin as opposed to smooth muscle myofibro-
mas, have also been known to appear in NF1
[33–36]. In one study, as much as 1% of NF1
individuals had rhabdomyosarcoma.
Some studies point to a role for neurofi-
bromin as a growth regulator for muscle
cells. This could explain a mutation in the
NF1 gene favoring muscle cell proliferation,
but formal proof is still lacking [37, 38].
At the age of 4 years, the boy presented
with a linear verrucous epidermal nevus on
the right side of his upper trunk.
Epidermal nevi are organoid nevi arising
from pluripotent germinative cells in the
basal layer of the embryonic epidermis and
are classified according to their predominant
component, in this case (nevus verrucosus)
keratinocyte. Although epidermal nevi are
often present at birth, they may develop dur-
ing childhood and are claimed to be caused
by somatic mosaicism, with a breakpoint
localized in a number of patients to the long
arm of chromosome 1, where the genes of
important epithelial structure proteins such
as profillagrin, involucrin, loricrin and tri-
chohyalin, as well as the two forms of cellular
retinoic acid binding protein are situated
[39–42].
In cases where the epidermal nevi are
associated with abnormalities in other organ
systems, the term ‘epidermal nevus syn-
drome’, originally described by Salomon in
1968, is used [42]. At present 5 epidermal
nevus syndromes are distinguished: (1) seba-
ceous nevus syndrome (Schimmelpenning-
Feuerstein-Mims), (2) comedo nevus syn-
drome, (3) Becker’s nevus syndrome, (4)
Proteus syndrome and (5) CHILD syndrome
[43].
The association of NF1 and epidermal
nevi has been described in the past and was
sometimes classified as epidermal nevus
syndrome [43–46].
In the case presented here the genetic
diagnosis of NF1 was established before the
epidermal verrucous nevus appeared, and it
Downloaded by:
University of Alabama, Lister Hill Library
138.26.31.3 - 5/1/2015 7:20:47 PM
226
Dermatology 2004;209:223–227
De Schepper/Janssens/Messiaen/
Van den Broecke/Naeyaert
is most probable that they have different
genetic origins since chromosomal aberra-
tions in chromosome 17 have not yet been
identified in epidermal nevi.
In summary, we present an unusual case
of sporadic NF1 caused by a total NF1 gene
deletion and associated with recurrent soft-
tissue tumors and an epidermal nevus.
Acknowledgments
S.D.S. is a research fellow of the Fund for
Scientific Research, Flanders, which sup-
ported this work (grant number G.0292.02).
This work was partially supported by
The Interuniversity Attraction Poles (IUAP)
grant from the Federal Office for Scientific,
Technical and Cultural Affairs, Belgium
(2002–2006, P5/25) to L.M.
References
1 Stumpf DA, Alksne JF, Annegers JF: Neurofi-
bromatosis. Arch Neurol 1988;45:575–578.
2 Gutmann DH, Aylsworth A, Carey JC, Korf B,
Marks J, Pyeritz RE, Rubenstein A, Viskochil
D: The diagnostic evaluation and multidisci-
plinary management of neurofibromatosis 1
and 2. JAMA 1997;278:51–57.
3 Messiaen LM, Callens T, Mortier G, Beysen D,
Vandenbroucke I, Van Roy N, Speleman F, De
Paepe AD: Exhaustive mutation analysis of the
NF1 gene allows identification of 95% of muta-
tions and reveals a high frequency of unusual
splicing defects. Hum Mutat 2000;15:541–
555.
4 Lopez-Correa C, Dorschner M, Brems H, Laza-
ro C, Clementi M, Upadhyaya M, Dooijes D,
Moog U, Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Rutkowski JL,
Fryns JP, Marynen P, Stephens K, Legius E:
Recombination hotspot in NF1 microdeletion
patients. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10:1387–
1392.
5 Lopez-Correa C, Brems H, Lazaro C, Marynen
P, Legius E: Unequal meiotic crossover: A fre-
quent cause of NF1 microdeletions. Am J Hum
Genet 2000;66:1969–1974.
6 Wu B, Boles R, Yaari H, Weremowicz S,
Schneider G, Korf B: Somatic mosaicism for
deletion of the entire NF1 gene identified by
FISH. Hum Genet 1997;99:209–213.
7 Valero M, Pascual-Castrovieja I, Velasco E,
Moreno F, Hernandez-Chico C: Identification
of de novo deletions at the NF1 gene: No pref-
erential paternal origin and phenotypic analy-
sis of patients. Hum Genet 1997;99:720–726.
8 Colman S, Rasmussen S, Ho V, Abernathy C,
Wallace M: Somatic mosaicism in a patient
with neurofibromatosis type 1. Am J Hum
Genet 1996;58:484–490.
9 Riva P, Castorina P, Manoukian S, Dalpra L,
Doneda L, Marini G, den Dunnen J, Larizza L:
Characterization of a cytogenetic 17q11.2 dele-
tion in an NF1 patient with a contiguous gene
syndrome. Hum Genet 1996;98:646–650.
10 Wu B, Austin M, Schneider G, Boles R, Korf B:
Deletion of the entire NF1 gene detected by the
FISH: Four deletion patients associated with
severe manifestations. Am J Med Genet 1995;
59:528–535.
11 Kayes L, Riccardi VM, Burke W, Bennett RL,
Stephens K: Large de novo DNA deletion in a
patient with sporadic neurofibromatosis 1,
mental retardation and dysmorphism. J Med
Genet 1992;29:686–690.
12 Wu B, Schneider G, Korf B: Deletion of the
entire NF1 gene causing distinct manifesta-
tions in a family. Am J Med Genet 1997;69:
98–101.
13 Kayes L, Burke W, Riccardi V, Bennett R, Ehr-
lich P, Rubenstein A, Stephans K: Deletions
spanning the neurofibromatosis 1 gene: Identi-
fication and phenotype of five patients. Am J
Med Genet 1994;54:424–436.
14 Leppig K, Kaplan P, Viskochil D, Weaver M,
Ortenberg J, Stephens K: Familial neurofibro-
matosis 1 microdeletions: Cosegregation with
distinct facial phenotype and early onset of
cutaneous neurofibromata. Am J Med Genet
1997;73:197–204.
15 Leppig K, Viskochil D, Neil S, Rubenstein A,
Johnson V, Zhu X, Brothman AR, Stephens K:
The detection of contiguous gene deletions at
the neurofibromatosis 1 locus with fluores-
cence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell
Genet 1996;72:95–98.
16 Tonsgard J, Yelavarthi K, Cushner S, Short M,
Lindgren V: Do NF1 gene deletions result in a
characteristic phenotype? Am J Med Genet
1997;73:80–86.
17 Upadhaya M, Ruggieri M, Maynard J, Osborn
M, Hartog C, Mudd S, Penttinen M, Cordeiro
I, Ponder M, Ponder B, Krawczak M, Cooper
D: Gross deletions of the neurofibromatosis
type 1 (NF1) gene are predominantly of mater-
nal origin and commonly associated with a
learning disability, dysmorphic features and
developmental delay. Hum Genet 1998;102:
591–597.
18 De Raedt T, Brems H, Wolkenstein P, Vidaud
D, Pilotti S, Perron F, Mautner V, Frahm S,
Sciot R, Legius E: Elevated risk for MPNST in
NF1 microdeletion patients. Am J Hum Genet
2003;72:1288–1292.
19 Rasmussen SA, Colman SD, Ho VT, Aberna-
thy CR, Arn PH, Weiss I, Schwartz C, Saul RA,
Wallace MR: Constitutional and large NF1
gene deletions in neurofibromatosis type 1. J
Med Genet 1998;35:468–471.
20 Friedman JM, Gutmann DH, MacCollin M,
Riccardi V: Neurofibromatosis. Phenotype,
Natural History and Pathogenesis, ed 3. Balti-
more, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
21 Stanford D, Rogers M: Dermatological presen-
tations of infantile myofibromatosis: A review
of 27 cases. Australas J Dermatol 2000;41:156–
161.
22 Kubota A, Yamauchi K, Imano M, Yonekura
T, Hoki M, Nose K, Hirooka S, Kato M, Oya-
nagi H, Nakayama M: An unusual presentation
of congenital infantile myofibromatosis arising
from the interspinous ligament. Pediatr Surg
Int 1998;14:138–139.
23 Giannakopoulou C, Hatzidaki E, Giannako-
poulos K, Mattaliotakis I, Koumantakis E, Kal-
manti M: Infantile myofibromatosis: A case
study and review of literature. J Dermatol
1999;26:595–598.
24 Muller W, Dahmen H: A combined neurofi-
broma-granular cell tumor of the middle crani-
al fossa. Pathol Res Pract 1978;163:378–386.
25 Selmanowitz V, Orentreich N: Lentiginosis
profusa in daughter and mother: Multiple gran-
ular cell ‘myoblastomas’ in the former. Arch
Dermatol 1970;101:615–616.
26 Bakos L: Multiple cutaneous granular cell tu-
mors with systemic defects: A distinct entity?
Int J Dermatol 1993;32:432–435.
27 Rubenstein D, Shanker D, Finlaysion L: Multi-
ple cutaneous granular cell tumors in children.
Pediatr Dermatol 1987;4:94–97.
28 Abrikossoff A: Ueber Myome, ausgehend von
der quergestreiften willkürlichen Muskulatur.
Virchows Arch Pathol Anat 1926;260:215–
233.
29 Martin R, Neldner K, Boyd A, Coates P: Multi-
ple cutaneous granular cell tumors and neurofi-
bromatosis in childhood. Arch Dermatol 1990;
126:1051–1056.
30 Sahn E, Dunlavey E, Parsons J: Multiple cuta-
neous granular cell tumors in a child with possi-
ble neurofibromatosis. J Am Acad Dermatol
1996;34:327–330.
31 Apted J: Multiple granular-cell myoblastoma
(schwannoma) in a child. Br J Dermatol 1968;
80:257–260.
32 Finkel G, Lane B: Granular cell variant of neu-
rofibromatosis: Ultrastructure of benign and
malignant tumors. Hum Pathol 1982;13:959–
963.
33 Lampe A, Seymour G, Thompson P, Toutain,
Toutain P, Lynch S: Familial neurofibromato-
sis microdeletion syndrome complicated by
rhabdomyosarcoma. Arch Dis Child 2002;87:
444–445.
34 Yang P, Grufferman S, Khoury M, Schwartz A,
Kowalski J, Ruymann F, Maurer H: Associa-
tion of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma with
neurofibromatosis type 1 and birth defects.
Genet Epidemiol 1995;12:467–474.
Downloaded by:
University of Alabama, Lister Hill Library
138.26.31.3 - 5/1/2015 7:20:47 PM
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and
Myofibromas
Dermatology 2004;209:223–227
227
35 Matsui I, Tanimura M, Kobayashi N, Sawada
T, Nagahara N, Akatsu J: Neurofibromatosis
type 1 and childhood cancer. Cancer 1993;72:
2746–2754.
36 Reich S, Overberg-Schmidt U, Leenen A,
Henze G: Neurofibromatosis 1 associated with
embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the urinary
bladder. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1999;16:263–
266.
37 Gutmann DH, Cole JL, Collins FS: Modula-
tion of neurofibromatosis type 1 gene expres-
sion during in vitro myofibroblast differentia-
tion. J Neurosci Res 1994;37:398–405.
38 Brannan CI, Perkins AS, Vogel KS, Ratner N,
Nordlund ML, Reid SW, Buchberg AM, Jen-
kins NA, Parada LF, Copeland NG: Targeted
disruption of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene
leads to developmental abnormalities in heart
and various neural crest-derived tissues. Genes
Dev 1994;8:1019–1029.
39 Stosiek N, Ulmer R, von den Driesch P,
Claussen U, Hornstein O, Rott HD: Chromo-
somal mosaicism in two patients with epider-
mal verrucous nevus. Demonstration of chro-
mosomal breakpoint. J Am Acad Dermatol
1994;30:622–625.
40 Rogers M, McCrossin I, Commens C: Epider-
mal nevi and the epidermal nevus syndrome. J
Am Acad Dermatol 1989;20:476–488.
41 Ikeda S, Kawada J, Yaguchi H, Ogawa H: A
case of unilateral, systematized linear hair folli-
cle nevi associated with epidermal nevus-like
lesions. Dermatology 2003;206:172–174.
42 Happle R: Mosaicism in human skin. Arch
Dermatol 1993;129:1460–1470.
43 Courville P, Thomine E, Surlemont Y, Hemet
J, Métayer J, Lauret P: Association d’un naevus
épidermique, d’une neurofibromatose de type
1 et d’un néphroblastome: Un nouveau syn-
drome du naevus épidermique? Ann Pathol
2000;20:616–619.
44 Möhrenschlager M, Engst R, Müller-Weihrich
S, Spiessl W, Rüdisser K, Weigl L, Jessberger
B, Braun-Falco M, Abeck D, Ring J: Associa-
tion of urticaria pigmentosa with café-au-lait
spots, neurofibromas and neurofibroma-like
neoplasms: A mere coincidence? Dermatology
2003:206:297–302.
45 Gambichler T, Küster W, Wolter M, Rapp S,
Altmeyer P, Hoffman K: Bilaterale segmentale
Neurofibromatose unter dem Bild eines epider-
malen Nävus. Hautarzt 2000;51:862–864.
46 Stein K, Shmunes E, Thew M: Neurofibroma-
tosis presenting as epidermal nevus syndrome.
Arch Dermatol 1972;105:229–232.
Downloaded by:
University of Alabama, Lister Hill Library
138.26.31.3 - 5/1/2015 7:20:47 PM
... [2] In our case, it was associated with lobster claw hand which is quite unusual. Other rare associations of inflammatory verrucous epidermal nevus include arthritis, basal cell carcinoma, [3] porokeratotic eccrine ostial and dermal duct nevus, [4] neurofibromatosis, [5] lichen amyloidosis, [6] and wooly hair nevus. Lobster claw hand, a rare congenital anomaly, also known as ectrodactyly or split hand foot malformation refers to central deficiencies of the hand, developing as a result of the longitudinal failure of the formation of 2 nd , 3 rd , or 4 th ray. ...
Article
A case of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor arising in the left upper extremity is reported in a 23-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-Noonan syndrome. The predominately mononuclear cellular proliferation with psammomatous calcifications had the immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of a fibrohistiocytic neoplasm. This uncommon type of soft tissue neoplasm occurring in this unique clinical setting served to open an inquiry into the subject of non-neurogenic tumors in association with NF1 and Noonan syndrome, both manifested in our patient. Nonossifying fibroma of bone as a presumptive fibrohistiocytic tumor is an uncommon but well-documented manifestation in NF1, whereas in Noonan-like syndrome, both giant cell granuloma and pigmented villonodular synovitis are recognized as associated lesions with histologic and immunophenotypic similarities with the diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor.
Article
Full-text available
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most common autosomal dominant disorders and is caused by mutations in the NF1 gene. Mutation detection is complex due to the large size of the NF1 gene, the presence of pseudogenes and the great variety of possible lesions. Although there is no evidence for locus heterogeneity in NF1, mutation detection rates rarely exceed 50%. We studied 67 unrelated NF1 patients fulfilling the NIH diagnostic criteria, 29 familial and 38 sporadic cases, using a cascade of complementary techniques. We performed a protein truncation test starting from puromycin-treated EBV cell lines and, if no mutation was found, continued with heteroduplex, FISH, Southern blot and cytogenetic analysis. We identified the germline mutation in 64 of 67 patients and 32 of the mutations are novel. This is the highest mutation detection rate reported in a study of typical NF1 patients. All mutations were studied at the genomic and RNA level. The mutational spectrum consisted of 25 nonsense, 12 frameshift, 19 splice mutations, six missense and/or small in-frame deletions, one deletion of the entire NF1 gene, and a translocation t(14;17)(q32;q11.2). Our data suggest that exons 10a-10c and 37 are mutation-rich regions and that together with some recurrent mutations they may account for almost 30% of the mutations in classical NF1 patients. We found a high frequency of unusual splice mutations outside of the AG/GT 5¢ and 3¢ splice sites. As some of these mutations form stable transcripts, it remains possible that a truncated neurofibromin is formed. Hum Mutat 15:541–555, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Article
Full-text available
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most common autosomal dominant disorders and is caused by mutations in the NF1 gene. Mutation detection is complex due to the large size of the NF1 gene, the presence of pseudogenes and the great variety of possible lesions. Although there is no evidence for locus heterogeneity in NF1, mutation detection rates rarely exceed 50%. We studied 67 unrelated NF1 patients fulfilling the NIH diagnostic criteria, 29 familial and 38 sporadic cases, using a cascade of complementary techniques. We performed a protein truncation test starting from puromycin-treated EBV cell lines and, if no mutation was found, continued with heteroduplex, FISH, Southern blot and cytogenetic analysis. We identified the germline mutation in 64 of 67 patients and 32 of the mutations are novel. This is the highest mutation detection rate reported in a study of typical NF1 patients. All mutations were studied at the genomic and RNA level. The mutational spectrum consisted of 25 nonsense, 12 frameshift, 19 splice mutations, six missense and/or small in-frame deletions, one deletion of the entire NF1 gene, and a translocation t(14;17)(q32;q11.2). Our data suggest that exons 10a-10c and 37 are mutation-rich regions and that together with some recurrent mutations they may account for almost 30% of the mutations in classical NF1 patients. We found a high frequency of unusual splice mutations outside of the AG/GT 5¢ and 3¢ splice sites. As some of these mutations form stable transcripts, it remains possible that a truncated neurofibromin is formed. Hum Mutat 15:541–555, 2000.
Article
The neurofibromatoses are genetic disorders that primarily affect cell growth of neural tissues. These disorders can cause tumors to grow on the nerves at any location and at any time. Some manifestations are progressive, and may result in significant morbidity or mortality. Two distinctive forms are recognized, but variant forms may exist. A variety of names have been used to describe all forms; subsequent information has made these names technically inaccurate or incomplete. To avoid these historical legacies and to conform to current nosology in other diseases, the Consensus Panel adopted a numbered classification. The most common type, neurofibromatosis 1 or NF-1 (previously known as von Recklinghausen's neurofibromatosis or peripheral neurofibromatosis), is an autosomal dominant disorder affecting about 1 in 4000 individuals. Multiple hyperpigmented areas (cafe au lait macules) and neurofibromas are characteristic. Neurofibromatosis 2 or NF-2 (previously known as bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis or central neurofibromatosis) is an autosomal dominant
Article
Objective. —Neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2 are autosomal dominant genetic disorders in which affected individuals develop both benign and malignant tumors at an increased frequency. Since the original National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference in 1987, there has been significant progress toward a more complete understanding of the molecular bases for neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2, recommendations for the care of patients and their families at diagnosis and during routine follow-up, and the role of DNA diagnostic testing in the evaluation of these disorders.Data Sources. —Published reports from 1966 through 1996 obtained by MEDLINE search and studies presented at national and international meetings.Study Selection. —All studies were reviewed and analyzed by consensus from multiple authors.Data Extraction. —Peer-reviewed published data were critically evaluated by independent extraction by multiple authors.Data Synthesis. —The main results of the review were qualitative and were reviewed by neurofibromatosis clinical directors worldwide through an Internet Web site.Conclusions. —On the basis of the information presented in this review, we propose a comprehensive approach to the diagnosis and treatment of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2.
Article
Genetic analysis of NF1 has indicated a wide diversity of mutations, including chromosome rearrangements, deletions, insertions, duplications, and point mutations. Recently, five severely affected individuals have been found by Kayes et al. [1994] to have deletions encompassing the entire gene. These deletions were detected by quantitative Southern analysis. To simplify deletion detection, we have employed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using intragenic probes. Thirteen unrelated individuals with NF1 have been studied. Among six with severe manifestations, four have been found to have deletions detected by probes cFF13, cFB5D, cP5, yA43A9, yA113D7 and yD8F4. All four deletion patients have severe developmental delay, minor and major anomalies (including one with bilateral iris colobomas), and multiple cutaneous neurofibromas or plexiform neurofibromas which were present before age 5 years. FISH provides a simple and rapid means of identification of NF1 gene deletions and will allow more rigorous testing of the hypothesis that such deletions are associated with severe manifestations. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Article
A notable subset of the recent literature on the disorder neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) describes patients with NF1, facial anomalies, and other unusual findings. We describe a molecular re-evaluation of two such families reported previously by Kaplan and Rosenblatt [1985], who suggested that their NF1 manifestations, facial phenotype, and other findings could result from a disorder distinct from NF1. Submicroscopic deletions involving the NF1 gene were identified in both families by fluorescent in situ hybridization and analysis of somatic cell hybrids. Affected subjects of the first family were heterozygous for a microdeletion of approximately 2 Mb, which included the entire NF1 gene and flanking contiguous sequences. The family was remarkable for cosegregation of the NF1 microdeletion with facial abnormalities and a pattern of early onset of cutaneous neurofibromata upon transmission from an affected mother to her three affected children. The propositus of the second family carried a deletion that at the least involved NF1 exon 2 through intron 27, which is ≥ 200 kilobases in length. Because all persons in the family were deceased, the size of the deletion could not be determined precisely. Facial anomalies were observed in the propositus and his NF1-affected mother and sister. The data from these families support our hypothesis, which was initially based solely on sporadic deletion cases, that deletion of the entire NF1 gene, or in conjunction with deletion of unknown contiguous genes, causes the facial anomalies and early onset of neurofibromata observed in this subset of NF1 patients. In addition, other features observed in the persons in these families suggest that some NF1 microdeletion patients may be at increased risk for connective tissue abnormalities and/or neoplasms. Am. J. Med. Genet. 73:197–204, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Article
Die Neurofibromatose ist eine neuroektodermale Systemerkrankung, wobei insbesondere die bilaterale segmentale Form eine seltene Variante dieser Erkrankung darstellt. Wir berichten über einen 29-jährigen Mann, bei dem bilateral papulöse Plaques in den lumbalen Dermatomen beobachtet wurden. Die klinisch einem epidermalen Nävus gleichenden Hauterscheinungen entsprachen histologisch oberflächlichen Neurofibromen. Die Familienanamnese sowie die ophthalmologischen und neurologischen Untersuchungen waren unauffällig. Die in diesem Fallbeispiel vorgestellte ungewöhnliche Morphologie einer bilateralen segmentalen Neurofibromatose spricht für die enorme klinische Variabilität dieser Erkrankung und weist auf die Bedeutung histologischer Untersuchungen bei systematisierten nävoiden Hautveränderungen hin. Neurofibromatosis is a neuroectodermal systemic disease. A rare variant of this condition is bilateral segmental neurofibromatosis. A 29-year-old man presented with bilateral papillomatous plaques in the lumbar dermatomes. Clinically, the lesions were very similar to an epidermal nevus but histologic examination revealed superficial neurofibromas. Family history, ophthalmologic and neurologic investigations were unremarkable. The unusual morphologic presentation of bilateral segmental neurofibromas in this case points to the wide clinical spectrum of the disease and the significance of histologic examination in systematic nevoid lesions.
Article
We report on a rare patient screened as a putative carrier of a contiguous gene syndrome on the basis of a complex phenotype characterized by sporadic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), dysmorphism, mental retardation and severe skeletal anomalies. A cytogenetically visible 17q11.2 deletion was detected in the patient’s karyotype by high-resolution banding and confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization with yeast artificial chromosomes targeting the NF1 region. Analysis of the segregation from parents to proband of 13 polymorphic DNA markers, either contiguous or contained within the NF1 gene, showed that the patient is hemizygous at sites within the NF1 gene – the AAAT-Alu repeat in the 5′ region of intron 27b, the CA/GT microsatellite in the 3′ region of intron 27b, and the CA/GT microsatellite in intron 38 – and at the extragenic D17S798 locus, distal to the 3′ end of NF1. The patient may be an important resource in the identification of genes downstream of NF1 that may contribute to some of his extra-NF1 clinical signs.