A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Health Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
What Mediates the Relationship Between Family Meals and Adolescent
Health Issues?
Debra L. Franko
Northeastern University
Douglas Thompson
Maryland Medical Research Institute
Sandra G. Affenito
St. Joseph College
Bruce A. Barton
Maryland Medical Research Institute
Ruth H. Striegel-Moore
Wesleyan University
Objective: To determine whether the frequency of family meals in childhood is associated with positive
health outcomes in adolescence through the mediating links of increased family cohesion and positive
coping skills. Design: Data were obtained from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and
Health Study (NGHS), a 10-year longitudinal study of 2,379 black and white girls assessed annually from
ages 9 –19. The mediational analysis framework of H. C. Kraemer and colleagues (2001) was used to test
the hypothesis that the frequency of family meals in childhood (Study Years 1 and 3) would be related
to health outcomes (Study Year 10) through the mediating links of family cohesion and coping skills
(Study Years 7/8), after adjusting for baseline (Year 1) demographics as well as previous levels of the
outcome variables (Years 5/6). Main Outcome Measures: Several measures of adolescent health
variables were included as outcome measures. These included the Perceived Stress Scale, three Eating
Disorders Inventory subscales (drive for thinness, body dissatisfaction, and bulimia), number of days of
alcohol and tobacco consumption, and engaging in extreme weight control behaviors (e.g., self-induced
vomiting). Results: More frequent family meals in the first 3 study years predicted greater family
cohesion and problem- and emotion-focused coping in Years 7 and 8. Family cohesion mediated family
meals and risk of smoking in Year 10. Problem-focused coping mediated family meals and both stress
and disordered eating-related attitudes and behaviors in Year 10. Conclusion: Eating together as a family
during childhood may have multiple benefits in later years.
Keywords: family meals, adolescence, adolescent health, smoking, disordered eating, stress
Familial variables are known to influence child and adolescent
health concerns, including nutrition, physical activity, and sub-
stance use (Kiesner & Kerr, 2004; Resnick, Harris, & Blum, 1993).
Eating together as a family (“family meals”) may be one compo-
nent of family life associated with positive health outcomes. More
specifically, investigators have found that frequent family meals
are associated with better nutrition and reduced risk of unhealthy
weight control behaviors, substance use, teenage sexual inter-
course, and suicidal risk (Borowsky, Ireland, & Resnick, 2001;
Fulkerson et al., 2006; Kingon & O’Sullivan, 2001; Neumark-
Sztainer, Hannan, Story, Croll, & Perry, 2003; Tepper, 1999).
Taveras and colleagues (Taveras et al., 2005) reported that eating
dinner together as a family was related to overweight prevalence at
study entry but was not associated in longitudinal analyses of their
data. In a single-wave survey of 4,746 middle and high school
students (ages 11–18), frequency of family meals was evaluated by
asking how many times over the previous 7 days did all or most of
the family eat a meal together. After controlling for factors including
family connectedness and demographics, girls reporting more fre-
quent family meals exhibited reduced substance use (cigarettes, alco-
hol, and marijuana), higher grade point average, fewer depressive
symptoms, and decreased risk of a suicide attempt (Eisenberg, Olson,
Debra L. Franko, Department of Counseling and Applied Educational
Psychology, Northeastern University; Douglas Thompson and Bruce A. Bar-
ton, Maryland Medical Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland; Sandra G.
Affenito, St. Joseph College; Ruth H. Striegel-Moore, Wesleyan University.
This research was supported by a grant from the National Heart, Lung, and
Blood Institute (NHLBI; HL/DK71122) and contract HC55023-26 and coop-
erative agreement U01-HL-48941-44. Participating NGHS centers included
the following: Children’s Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio: Stephen R.
Daniels, MD, (principal investigator) and John A. Morrison, PhD (co-
investigator); Westat, Inc., Rockville, Maryland: George B. Schreiber, ScD
(principal investigator) and Ruth Striegel-Moore, PhD (co-investigator); and
University of California, Berkeley, California: Zak I. Sabry, PhD (principal
investigator) and Patricia B. Crawford, DrPH, RD (co-investigator). Maryland
Medical Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland (Bruce A. Barton, PhD,
principal investigator) served as the data coordinating center. Program office
was NHLBI: Eva Obarzanek, PhD, MPH, RD (project officer 1992-2007) and
Gerald H. Payne, MD (project officer 1985–1991).
We acknowledge with gratitude the long-term commitment of all NGHS
participants and their families who contributed to this study and the NGHS
study personnel for their dedication to the project.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Debra L.
Franko, Department of Counseling and Applied Educational Psychology,
Northeastern University, 203 Lake Hall, Boston, MA 02115-5000. E-mail:
d.franko@neu.edu
Health Psychology Copyright 2008 by the American Psychological Association
2008, Vol. 27, No. 2(Suppl.), S109–S117 0278-6133/08/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2(Suppl.).S109
S109
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.