ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

In the title compound, C(13)H(10)O(3), a benzophenone derivative, the least-squares planes defined by the C atoms of the 2-hy-droxy-phenyl rings inter-sect at an angle of 45.49 (3)°. The substituents on the aromatic systems are both orientated towards the central O atom. Intra- as well as inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds are observed, the latter giving rise to the formation of centrosymmetric dimers. The closest centroid-centroid distance between two π-systems is 3.7934 (7) Å.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)methanone
Richard Betz,* Thomas Gerber and Henk Schalekamp
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Summerstrand Campus, Department of
Chemistry, University Way, Summerstrand, PO Box 77000, Port Elizabeth 6031,
South Africa
Correspondence e-mail: richard.betz@webmail.co.za
Received 23 June 2011; accepted 28 June 2011
Key indicators: single-crystal X-ray study; T= 200 K; mean (C–C) = 0.002 A
˚;
Rfactor = 0.038; wR factor = 0.106; data-to-parameter ratio = 16.9.
In the title compound, C
13
H
10
O
3
, a benzophenone derivative,
the least-squares planes defined by the C atoms of the 2-
hydroxyphenyl rings intersect at an angle of 45.49 (3).The
substituents on the aromatic systems are both orientated
towards the central O atom. Intra- as well as intermolecular
O—HO hydrogen bonds are observed, the latter giving rise
to the formation of centrosymmetric dimers. The closest
centroid–centroid distance between two -systems is
3.7934 (7) A
˚.
Related literature
For the crystal structure of benzophenone, see: Lobanova
(1968); Kutzke et al. (2000); Fleischer et al. (1968); Bernstein et
al. (2002); Moncol & Coppens (2004). For graph-set analysis of
hydrogen bonds, see: Etter et al. (1990); Bernstein et al. (1995).
Chelate ligands have found widespread use in coordination
chemistry due to the enhanced thermodynamic stability of the
resultant coordination compounds in relation to those exclu-
sively applying comparable monodentate ligands, see: Gade
(1998).
Experimental
Crystal data
C
13
H
10
O
3
M
r
= 214.21
Monoclinic, P21=c
a= 7.7371 (2) A
˚
b= 12.2169 (4) A
˚
c= 11.3419 (3) A
˚
= 110.610 (2)
V= 1003.46 (5) A
˚
3
Z=4
Mo Kradiation
= 0.10 mm
1
T= 200 K
0.24 0.20 0.18 mm
Data collection
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
9306 measured reflections
2483 independent reflections
1939 reflections with I>2(I)
R
int
= 0.033
Refinement
R[F
2
>2(F
2
)] = 0.038
wR(F
2
) = 0.106
S= 1.05
2483 reflections
147 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
max
= 0.27 e A
˚
3
min
=0.19 e A
˚
3
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (A
˚,).
D—HAD—H HADAD—HA
O2—H2O1 0.84 1.88 2.6061 (11) 144
O2—H2O1
i
0.84 2.44 2.9976 (12) 124
O3—H3O1 0.84 1.95 2.6623 (11) 142
Symmetry code: (i) xþ2;y;z.
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010); cell refinement: SAINT
(Bruker, 2010); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve
structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine
structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics:
ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); soft-
ware used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and
PLATON (Spek, 2009).
The authors thank Mr Phindile Gaika for helpful discus-
sions.
Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the
IUCr electronic archives (Reference: IM2302).
References
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.
Bernstein, J., Ellern, A. & Henck, J.-O. (2002). Private communication (CCDC
118986, ref-code BPHNO11). CCDC, Cambridge, England.
Bruker (2010). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsi-
n.USA.
Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262.
Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
Fleischer, E. B., Sung, N. & Hawkinson, S. (1968). J. Phys. Chem. 72, 4311–
4312.
Gade, L. H. (1998). Koordinationschemie, 1. Auflage, Weinheim: Wiley–VCH.
Kutzke, H., Klapper, H., Hammond, R. B. & Roberts, K. J. (2000). Acta Cryst.
B56, 486–496.
Lobanova, G. M. (1968). Kristallografiya,13, 984–986.
Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P.,
Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood,
P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.
Moncol, J. & Coppens, P. (2004). Private communication (CCDC 245188, ref-
code BPHNO12). CCDC, Cambridge, England.
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.
organic compounds
Acta Cryst. (2011). E67, o1897 doi:10.1107/S1600536811025438 Betz et al. o1897
Acta Crystallographica Section E
Structure Reports
Online
ISSN 1600-5368
supplementary materials
supplementary materials
sup-1
Acta Cryst. (2011). E67, o1897 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536811025438 ]
Bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)methanone
R. Betz, T. Gerber and H. Schalekamp
Comment
Chelate ligands have found widespread use in coordination chemistry due to the enhanced thermodynamic stability of res-
ultant coordination compounds in relation to coordination compounds exclusively applying comparable monodentate lig-
ands (Gade, 1998). Combining two identical donor atoms in different states of hybridization seemed to be useful to us to
accomodate a large variety of metal centers of variable Lewis acidity. To enable comparative studies in terms of bond lengths
and angles in envisioned coordination compounds, we determined the molecular and crystal structure of the title compound.
The crystal structure of benzophenone is apparent in the literature (Lobanova, 1968; Kutzke et al., 2000; Fleischer et al.,
1968; Bernstein et al., 2002; Moncol & Coppens, 2004).
The title compound is a symmetrical substitution product of benzophenone bearing one hydroxyl group in ortho-position
of each phenyl ring. Both aromatic moieties adopt a conformation in which the substituents are orientated towards the central
oxygen atom. The least-squares planes defined by the respective carbon atoms of both ortho-hydroxyphenyl rings intersect
at an angle of 45.49 (3) °. Intracyclic C–C–C angles hardly deviate from the ideal value of 120 °.
In the crystal structure, intra- as well as intermolecular hydrogen bonds are observed. In both cases, the sp2-hybridized
oxygen atom acts as acceptor, but while one of the hydroxyl groups exclusively forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond,
the other hydroxyl group forms a bifurcated hydrogen bond to the keto group's oxygen atom of a neighbouring molecule
as well. In total, two molecules are connected to centrosymmetric dimers. The descriptor for the hydrogen bonding system
in terms of graph-set analysis (Etter et al., 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995) is DDR22(12) on the unitary level. The shortest
intercentroid distance between two π-systems is 3.7934 (7) Å and is apparent between two different aromatic moieties.
The packing of the title compound in the crystal structure is shown in Figure 3.
Experimental
The compound was obtained commercially (Aldrich). Crystals suitable for the X-ray diffraction study were taken directly
from the provided product.
Refinement
Carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H 0.95 Å) and were included in the refinement in the riding
model approximation, with U(H) set to 1.2Ueq(C). The hydrogen atoms of the hydroxyl groups were allowed to rotate with
a fixed angle around the O–C bonds to best fit the experimental electron density (HFIX 147 in the SHELX program suite
(Sheldrick, 2008).
supplementary materials
sup-2
Figures
Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound, with atom labels and anisotropic dis-
placement ellipsoids (drawn at 50% probability level).
Fig. 2. Intermolecular contacts, viewed along [-1 0 0]. Symmetry operator: i -x + 2, -y, -z.
Fig. 3. Molecular packing of the title compound, viewed along [0 1 0] (anisotropic displace-
ment ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability level).
Bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)methanone
Crystal data
C13H10O3F(000) = 448
Mr = 214.21 Dx = 1.418 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 4455 reflections
a = 7.7371 (2) Å θ = 2.5–28.3°
b = 12.2169 (4) Å µ = 0.10 mm−1
c = 11.3419 (3) Å T = 200 K
β = 110.610 (2)° Platelet, colourless
V = 1003.46 (5) Å30.24 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm
supplementary materials
sup-3
Z = 4
Data collection
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer 1939 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.033
graphite θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.5°
φ and ω scans h = −9→10
9306 measured reflections k = −15→16
2483 independent reflections l = −15→15
Refinement
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct
methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring
sites
wR(F2) = 0.106 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0563P)2 + 0.1145P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2483 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
147 parameters Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 0.97092 (13) 0.09617 (6) 0.08169 (7) 0.0405 (2)
O2 0.78137 (13) 0.09971 (7) −0.15911 (8) 0.0407 (2)
H2 0.8528 0.0719 −0.0919 0.061*
O3 1.09865 (13) 0.09673 (6) 0.33247 (8) 0.0407 (2)
H3 1.0534 0.0664 0.2617 0.061*
C1 0.94988 (15) 0.19703 (8) 0.08687 (9) 0.0271 (2)
C11 0.80678 (14) 0.25299 (8) −0.01695 (9) 0.0255 (2)
C12 0.73030 (15) 0.20048 (9) −0.13533 (10) 0.0294 (2)
C13 0.59669 (16) 0.25366 (10) −0.23411 (10) 0.0348 (3)
H13 0.5499 0.2199 −0.3146 0.042*
C14 0.53150 (16) 0.35473 (10) −0.21639 (11) 0.0358 (3)
H14 0.4388 0.3896 −0.2844 0.043*
C15 0.60019 (16) 0.40645 (9) −0.09954 (10) 0.0334 (3)
H15 0.5537 0.4759 −0.0876 0.040*
C16 0.73588 (15) 0.35604 (9) −0.00167 (10) 0.0287 (2)
H16 0.7827 0.3915 0.0779 0.034*
C21 1.06958 (14) 0.25691 (8) 0.19946 (9) 0.0253 (2)
C22 1.13591 (15) 0.20282 (9) 0.31684 (9) 0.0283 (2)
C23 1.24280 (15) 0.25933 (10) 0.42392 (9) 0.0340 (3)
supplementary materials
sup-4
H23 1.2807 0.2242 0.5037 0.041*
C24 1.29406 (17) 0.36599 (10) 0.41490 (11) 0.0372 (3)
H24 1.3674 0.4039 0.4887 0.045*
C25 1.23981 (16) 0.41868 (9) 0.29931 (11) 0.0341 (3)
H25 1.2798 0.4913 0.2933 0.041*
C26 1.12737 (15) 0.36495 (8) 0.19308 (10) 0.0282 (2)
H26 1.0883 0.4017 0.1142 0.034*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.0588 (6) 0.0236 (4) 0.0317 (4) 0.0033 (4) 0.0067 (4) −0.0005 (3)
O2 0.0478 (5) 0.0359 (5) 0.0319 (4) 0.0011 (4) 0.0058 (4) −0.0106 (3)
O3 0.0538 (6) 0.0312 (4) 0.0305 (4) −0.0037 (4) 0.0068 (4) 0.0094 (3)
C1 0.0338 (6) 0.0232 (5) 0.0247 (5) −0.0006 (4) 0.0107 (4) 0.0006 (4)
C11 0.0279 (5) 0.0258 (5) 0.0223 (5) −0.0033 (4) 0.0081 (4) 0.0005 (4)
C12 0.0301 (5) 0.0315 (5) 0.0266 (5) −0.0041 (4) 0.0101 (4) −0.0028 (4)
C13 0.0319 (6) 0.0471 (7) 0.0217 (5) −0.0048 (5) 0.0051 (4) −0.0022 (5)
C14 0.0293 (6) 0.0478 (7) 0.0282 (5) 0.0025 (5) 0.0073 (5) 0.0099 (5)
C15 0.0340 (6) 0.0331 (6) 0.0341 (6) 0.0052 (5) 0.0131 (5) 0.0051 (5)
C16 0.0312 (5) 0.0296 (5) 0.0254 (5) −0.0006 (4) 0.0099 (4) 0.0004 (4)
C21 0.0268 (5) 0.0258 (5) 0.0230 (5) 0.0023 (4) 0.0083 (4) 0.0012 (4)
C22 0.0290 (5) 0.0293 (5) 0.0264 (5) 0.0024 (4) 0.0097 (4) 0.0040 (4)
C23 0.0333 (6) 0.0448 (7) 0.0218 (5) 0.0014 (5) 0.0074 (5) 0.0038 (5)
C24 0.0355 (6) 0.0454 (7) 0.0279 (6) −0.0065 (5) 0.0078 (5) −0.0082 (5)
C25 0.0354 (6) 0.0313 (6) 0.0356 (6) −0.0059 (5) 0.0125 (5) −0.0042 (5)
C26 0.0304 (5) 0.0275 (5) 0.0269 (5) 0.0012 (4) 0.0101 (4) 0.0019 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, °)
O1—C1 1.2470 (12) C15—C16 1.3760 (15)
O2—C12 1.3489 (13) C15—H15 0.9500
O2—H2 0.8400 C16—H16 0.9500
O3—C22 1.3530 (13) C21—C26 1.4035 (14)
O3—H3 0.8400 C21—C22 1.4112 (13)
C1—C11 1.4703 (14) C22—C23 1.3886 (15)
C1—C21 1.4802 (14) C23—C24 1.3763 (16)
C11—C16 1.4081 (15) C23—H23 0.9500
C11—C12 1.4161 (14) C24—C25 1.3864 (16)
C12—C13 1.3894 (15) C24—H24 0.9500
C13—C14 1.3750 (17) C25—C26 1.3790 (15)
C13—H13 0.9500 C25—H25 0.9500
C14—C15 1.3936 (16) C26—H26 0.9500
C14—H14 0.9500
C12—O2—H2 109.5 C15—C16—H16 119.3
C22—O3—H3 109.5 C11—C16—H16 119.3
O1—C1—C11 119.72 (9) C26—C21—C22 118.19 (9)
O1—C1—C21 118.46 (9) C26—C21—C1 122.29 (9)
supplementary materials
sup-5
C11—C1—C21 121.81 (9) C22—C21—C1 119.46 (9)
C16—C11—C12 118.09 (9) O3—C22—C23 116.77 (9)
C16—C11—C1 122.23 (9) O3—C22—C21 123.28 (9)
C12—C11—C1 119.62 (9) C23—C22—C21 119.94 (10)
O2—C12—C13 116.92 (9) C24—C23—C22 120.28 (10)
O2—C12—C11 123.30 (10) C24—C23—H23 119.9
C13—C12—C11 119.78 (10) C22—C23—H23 119.9
C14—C13—C12 120.60 (10) C23—C24—C25 120.71 (10)
C14—C13—H13 119.7 C23—C24—H24 119.6
C12—C13—H13 119.7 C25—C24—H24 119.6
C13—C14—C15 120.62 (10) C26—C25—C24 119.54 (10)
C13—C14—H14 119.7 C26—C25—H25 120.2
C15—C14—H14 119.7 C24—C25—H25 120.2
C16—C15—C14 119.44 (11) C25—C26—C21 121.14 (10)
C16—C15—H15 120.3 C25—C26—H26 119.4
C14—C15—H15 120.3 C21—C26—H26 119.4
C15—C16—C11 121.37 (10)
O1—C1—C11—C16 159.44 (10) O1—C1—C21—C26 146.95 (11)
C21—C1—C11—C16 −19.72 (15) C11—C1—C21—C26 −33.88 (15)
O1—C1—C11—C12 −17.66 (15) O1—C1—C21—C22 −30.02 (14)
C21—C1—C11—C12 163.18 (10) C11—C1—C21—C22 149.15 (10)
C16—C11—C12—O2 −176.94 (9) C26—C21—C22—O3 −175.80 (10)
C1—C11—C12—O2 0.28 (16) C1—C21—C22—O3 1.29 (16)
C16—C11—C12—C13 3.58 (15) C26—C21—C22—C23 5.22 (15)
C1—C11—C12—C13 −179.20 (9) C1—C21—C22—C23 −177.68 (9)
O2—C12—C13—C14 177.36 (10) O3—C22—C23—C24 176.91 (10)
C11—C12—C13—C14 −3.13 (17) C21—C22—C23—C24 −4.05 (17)
C12—C13—C14—C15 0.97 (17) C22—C23—C24—C25 0.12 (18)
C13—C14—C15—C16 0.68 (17) C23—C24—C25—C26 2.53 (18)
C14—C15—C16—C11 −0.13 (17) C24—C25—C26—C21 −1.22 (17)
C12—C11—C16—C15 −1.98 (15) C22—C21—C26—C25 −2.61 (16)
C1—C11—C16—C15 −179.12 (10) C1—C21—C26—C25 −179.62 (10)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O2—H2···O1 0.84 1.88 2.6061 (11) 144
O2—H2···O1i0.84 2.44 2.9976 (12) 124
O3—H3···O1 0.84 1.95 2.6623 (11) 142
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y, −z.
supplementary materials
sup-6
Fig. 1
supplementary materials
sup-7
Fig. 2
supplementary materials
sup-8
Fig. 3
... Figure 4 shows the fluorescence intensity of Mn-MOF at 308 nm increased with increase in adsorption time. The investigation of the luminescence properties of this compound revealed its efficient room-temperature phosphorescence in solution with a remarkable weak quenching by molecular oxygen [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. The photophysical result displayed how the electron donor ability of the ligands and the electron-withdrawing character of the manganese(II) results in bathochromic shift of emission maximum (in the 324-460nm) and a decrease in the luminescence quantum yield showing the Mn(II) play a key role in the observed phosphorescence [5,6]. ...
Article
Full-text available
A new complex, Mn3 (C7 H4 O2 )2 (C12H8 N2 )(CH3 OH)2 (H2 O)4 , has been synthesized under slow solvent evaporation method. The compound was characterized by photoluminescence and single crystal X-ray diffraction techniques. The compound gives triclinic structure with a space group P-1(No. 2). The observed unit cell dimensions are a = 7.4369(3)Ǻ, b= 12.9898(6)Ǻ, c = 14.1176(6)Ǻ, α =88.847(2)°, β =82.518(2)°, γ = 89.975(2)° , V = 1351.93(10)Ǻ³, and Z = 2. Its asymmetric unit consists of centrosymmetric trinuclear MnII cation, four water molecules, four oxygen atoms from benzoate dianion and 1, 10- phenanthroline molecule. Each of the MnII cations is six-coordinated forming octahedral geometry. The crystal packing of the prepared compound is stabilized by strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds forming 2D structure which further engaged in a weak C —H…O, C—N---O, O—H…O and N—H….O hydrogen bonding to create a 3D network. The determined molar conductance in DMSO solution was 9.35Ω-1cm2 mol-1 indicating a non-electrolyte behavior of this compound. Mn-MOF shows fluorescence in solution ranging from 324-460nm revealing its efficient room-temperature phosphorescence in chloroform with a remarkable weak quenching by molecular oxygen, an indication that this compound can be used in fields such as drugs industries, energy storage systems, as luminescence sensors to analyze water, air and chemical pollutions. Keywords: Crystal structure; 1, 10-phenanthroline; Benzoate anion; MnII complex; Photoluminescence
Article
Full-text available
The inability to determine precisely the location of labile protons in X-ray molecular structures has been a key barrier to progress in many areas of molecular sciences. We report an approach for predicting hydrogen bond distances beyond the limits of X-ray crystallography based on accurate ab initio calculations of O–H---O proton chemical shifts, using a combination of DFT and contactor polarizable continuum model (CPCM). Very good linear correlation between experimental and computed (at the GIAO/B3LYP/6-311++G(2d,p) level of theory) chemical shifts were obtained with a large set of 43 compounds in CHCl3 exhibiting intramolecular O–H---O and intermolecular and intramolecular ionic O–H----O hydrogen bonds. The calculated OH chemical shifts exhibit a strong linear dependence on the computed (O)H---O hydrogen bond length, in the region of 1.24 to 1.85 Å, of -19.8 ppm Å-1 and -20.49 ppm Å-1 with optimization of the structures at the DFT/M06-2X/6-31+G(d) and DFT/B3LYP/6-31+G(d) level of theory, respectively. A Natural Bond Orbitals (NBO) analysis demonstrates a very good linear correlation between the calculated 1H chemical shifts and (i) the second-order perturbation stabilization energies, corresponding to charge transfer between the oxygen lone pairs and σ_OH^* antibonding orbital and (ii) Wiberg bond order of the O–H---O and O–H----O hydrogen bond. Accurate ab initio calculations of O–H---O and O–H----O 1H chemical shifts can provide improved structural and electronic description of hydrogen bonding and a highly accurate measure of distances of short and strong hydrogen bonds.
Article
The complexation reaction of Co2+ (M) and the 1,1-diethyl-3-(4-methoxybenzoyl)thiourea (L) ligand in the binary mixtures: acetonitrile–dimethylsulfoxide (MeCN–DMSO), acetonitrile–dichloromethane (MeCN–DCM), water–dimethylsulfoxide (H2O–DMSO) and acetonitrile–water (MeCN–H2O), was investigated using a conductometric method at temperatures of (288.15, 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15) K. In all cases, the conductance data showed that the stoichiometry of the neutral complex formed between M and L is 1:3 [M:3L], which indicates that the Co2+ ion was oxidized to Co3+ during the reaction. The best estimate of the stability constant, log10 K f, = 3.31 for the [CoL3] complex, was observed with the MeCN–DCM (20:80 %) binary mixture at 298.15 K. The values of the thermodynamic parameters (i.e., \( \Delta G_{\text{c}}^{^\circ } \) and \( \Delta S_{\text{c}}^{^\circ } \)) for the formation of the [CoL3] complex were obtained from the temperature dependence of the stability constant via van’t Hoff plots. The results show that, in most cases, the [CoL3] complexes are enthalpy destabilized but entropy stabilized. The values and signs of the thermodynamic parameters are affected by the nature and composition of the mixed solvents but are independent of the temperature.
Article
Full-text available
The title compound, C(14)H(12)O(4), is an asymmetric substitution product of benzophenone. Both hy-droxy groups are orientated towards the O atom of the keto group. Intra-molecular as well as inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds can be observed in the crystal structure, with the latter connecting the mol-ecules into chains along the crystallographic b axis. C-H⋯O contacts [C⋯O = 3.3297 (18) Å] are also apparent. The closest centroid-centroid distance between two aromatic systems is 4.9186 (9) Å.
Article
Full-text available
The title benzophenone compound, C(14)H(12)O(6)·H(2)O, was isolated from the bark of Garcinia hombroniana Pierre (Guttiferae). The mol-ecule is twisted, the dihedral angle between the two benzene rings being 59.13 (7)°. The meth-oxy group is approximately coplanar with the attached benzene ring, with a C-O-C-C torsion angle of 1.91 (18)°. The water mol-ecule is disordered over two positions in a 0.555 (19):0.445 (19) ratio. An intra-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bond generates an S(6) ring motif. The crystal structure is stabilized by inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds. These inter-actions link the mol-ecules into sheets parallel to the ac plane. The sheets are stacked along the b axis by π-π inter-actions, with centroid-centroid distances of 3.6219 (7) Å. A weak O-H⋯π inter-action was also noted.
Article
Full-text available
Automated structure validation was introduced in chemical crystallography about 12 years ago as a tool to assist practitioners with the exponential growth in crystal structure analyses. Validation has since evolved into an easy-to-use checkCIF/PLATON web-based IUCr service. The result of a crystal structure determination has to be supplied as a CIF-formatted computer-readable file. The checking software tests the data in the CIF for completeness, quality and consistency. In addition, the reported structure is checked for incomplete analysis, errors in the analysis and relevant issues to be verified. A validation report is generated in the form of a list of ALERTS on the issues to be corrected, checked or commented on. Structure validation has largely eliminated obvious problems with structure reports published in IUCr journals, such as refinement in a space group of too low symmetry. This paper reports on the current status of structure validation and possible future extensions.
Article
Full-text available
A method is presented based on graph theory for categorizing hydrogen-bond motifs in such a way that complex hydrogen-bond patterns can be disentangled, or decoded, systematically and consistently. This method is based on viewing hydrogen-bond patterns topologically as if they were intertwined nets with molecules as the nodes and hydrogen bonds as the lines. Surprisingly, very few parameters are needed to define the hydrogen-bond motifs comprising these networks. The methods for making these assignments, and examples of their chemical utility are given.
Article
The crystallographic problem: The production, and the visibility in the published literature, of thermal ellipsoid plots for small-molecule crystallographic studies remains an important method for assessing the quality of reported results. Since the mid 1960s, the program ORTEP (Johnson, 1965) has been perhaps the most popular computer program for generating thermal ellipsoid drawings for publication. The recently released update of ORTEP-III (Johnson & Burnett, 1996) has some additional features over the earlier versions, but still relies on fixed-format input files. Many users will find this very inconvenient, and will prefer to obtain drawings directly from their crystallographic coordinate files. This new version of ORTEP-3 for Windows provides all the facilities of ORTEP-III, but with a modern Graphical User Interface (GUI). Method of solution: A Microsoft-Windows GUI has been added to ORTEP-III. All the facilities of ORTEP-III are retained, and a number of extra features have been added. The GUI is effectively an editor that writes ORTEP-III input files, but the user need not have any knowledge of the inner workings of ORTEP. The main features of this program are: (i) ORTEP-3 for Windows can directly read many of the common crystallographic ASCII file formats. Currently supported formats are SHELX (Sheldrick, 1993), GX (Mallinson & Muir, 1985), GIF (Hall, Allen & Brown, 1991), SPF (Spek, 1990), CRYSTALS (Watkin, Prout, Carruthers & Betteridge, 1996), CSD-XR and CSD-FDAT. In addition, ORTEP-3 for Windows will accept any legal ORTEP-III instruction file. (ii) Covalent radii for the first 94 elements are stored internally, and may be modified by the user. All bonds are calculated automatically, and any individual bonds may be selected for removal, or for a special representation. (iii) The graphical representations of thermal ellipsoids for any element or selected sets of atoms can be individually set. All the possible graphical representations of thermal ellipsoids in ORTEP-III are also available in ORTEP-3 for Windows. (iv) A mouse labelling routine is provided by the GUI. Any number of selected atoms may be labelled, and any available Windows font may be used for the labels. The font attributes, e.g. italic, bold, colour, point size etc. can also be selected via a standard Windows dialog box. (v) As well as HPGL and PostScript Graphics graphic metafiles, it is also possible to get high quality graphics output by printing directly to an attached printer. The screen display may be saved as BMP or PCX format metafiles, and may also be copied to the clip-board for subsequent use by other Windows programs, e.g. word processing or graphics processing programs. Colour is available for all these output modes. (vi) A simple text editor is provided, so that input files may be modified without leaving the program. (vii) Symmetry expansion of the asymmetric unit to give complete connected fragments may be carried out automatically. (viii) Unit-cell packing diagrams are produced automatically. (ix) A number of options are provided to control the view direction. The molecular view may be rotated or translated by button commands from the tool bar, and views normal to crystallographic planes may also be obtained. Software environment and program specification: The program will read several common crystallographic file formats which hold information on the anisotropic displacement parameters. The operation of the program is carried out via standard self-explanatory MS-Windows menu items and dialog boxes. Hard-copy output is either by HPGL or Encapsulated PostScript metafiles, or by directly printing the graphics screen. Hardware environment: The program is implemented for IBM PC compatible computers running MS-Windows versions 3.1x, Windows 95 or Windows NT. At least a 486-66 machine is recommended with 8 Mbytes of RAM, and at least 5 Mbytes of disk space. Documentation and availability: The executable program, together with full documentation, is available free for academic users from http://www.chem. gla.ac.uk/̃louis/ortep3. Although the program is written in Fortran77, a large number of nonstandard FTN77 calls are used to create the GUI. For this reason, the source code is not available.
Article
Whereas much of organic chemistry has classically dealt with the preparation and study of the properties of individual molecules, an increasingly significant portion of the activity in chemical research involves understanding and utilizing the nature of the interactions between molecules. Two representative areas of this evolution are supramolecular chemistry and molecular recognition. The interactions between molecules are governed by intermolecular forces whose energetic and geometric properties are much less well understood than those of classical chemical bonds between atoms. Among the strongest of these interactions, however, are hydrogen bonds, whose directional properties are better understood on the local level (that is, for a single hydrogen bond) than many other types of non-bonded interactions. Nevertheless, the means by which to characterize, understand, and predict the consequences of many hydrogen bonds among molecules, and the resulting formation of molecular aggregates (on the microscopic scale) or crystals (on the macroscopic scale) has remained largely enigmatic. One of the most promising systematic approaches to resolving this enigma was initially developed by the late M. C. Etter, who applied graph theory to recognize, and then utilize, patterns of hydrogen bonding for the understanding and design of molecular crystals. In working with Etter's original ideas the power and potential utility of this approach on one hand, and on the other, the need to develop and extend the initial Etter formalism was generally recognized. It with that latter purpose that we originally undertook the present review.
Article
The program Mercury, developed by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, is designed primarily as a crystal structure visualization tool. A new module of functionality has been produced, called the Materials Module, which allows highly customizable searching of structural databases for intermolecular interaction motifs and packing patterns. This new module also includes the ability to perform packing similarity calculations between structures containing the same compound. In addition to the Materials Module, a range of further enhancements to Mercury has been added in this latest release, including void visualization and links to ConQuest, Mogul and IsoStar.
Article
Benzophenone was the first organic molecular material to be identified as polymorphic. It is well known that benzophenone crystallizes in a stable orthorhombic alpha-form (m.p. 321 K) with space group P2(1)2(1)2(1) and a = 10.28, b = 12.12, c = 7.99 A, [Girdwood (1998). Ph.D. thesis. Strathclyde University, Glasgow, Scotland]. Here we report two separate structure determinations of the metastable beta-form (m.p. 297-299 K). Crystalline material of the metastable polymorph was obtained from a melt supercooled to approximately 243 K. The structure was determined from X-ray powder diffraction data by employing a novel, computational systematic search procedure to identify trial packing arrangements for subsequent refinement. Unit-cell and space-group information, determined from indexing the powder diffraction data, was used to define the search space. The structure was also determined from single-crystal diffraction data at room temperature and at 223 K. The metastable phase is monoclinic with space group C2/c and a = 16.22, b = 8.15, c = 16.33 A, beta = 112.91 degrees (at 223 K). The structures derived from the individual techniques are qualitatively the same. They are compared both with each other and with the stable polymorph and other benzophenone derivatives.
Article
An account is given of the development of the SHELX system of computer programs from SHELX-76 to the present day. In addition to identifying useful innovations that have come into general use through their implementation in SHELX, a critical analysis is presented of the less-successful features, missed opportunities and desirable improvements for future releases of the software. An attempt is made to understand how a program originally designed for photographic intensity data, punched cards and computers over 10000 times slower than an average modern personal computer has managed to survive for so long. SHELXL is the most widely used program for small-molecule refinement and SHELXS and SHELXD are often employed for structure solution despite the availability of objectively superior programs. SHELXL also finds a niche for the refinement of macromolecules against high-resolution or twinned data; SHELXPRO acts as an interface for macromolecular applications. SHELXC, SHELXD and SHELXE are proving useful for the experimental phasing of macromolecules, especially because they are fast and robust and so are often employed in pipelines for high-throughput phasing. This paper could serve as a general literature citation when one or more of the open-source SHELX programs (and the Bruker AXS version SHELXTL) are employed in the course of a crystal-structure determination.
  • E B Fleischer
  • N Sung
  • S Hawkinson
Fleischer, E. B., Sung, N. & Hawkinson, S. (1968). J. Phys. Chem. 72, 4311-4312.
  • G M Lobanova
Lobanova, G. M. (1968). Kristallografiya, 13, 984-986.