ArticlePDF Available
August 15, 2011
Volume 84, Number 4 www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician  453
SAFET Y
Doxepin is safe when used at low dosages.
Antidepressants are required to have label-
ing that warns of an increased risk of sui-
cide; however, there have been no reports
of suicide among patients taking low-dose
doxepin. Unlike higher-dose formulations
of doxepin, Silenor does not have a boxed
warning for suicide risk.1 No dosage adjust-
ments are necessary in patients with renal
impairment. Doxepin should not be used
in patients with severe urinary retention or
in those who also take or who have recently
stopped taking monoamine oxidase inhibi-
tors. Abrupt discontinuation is not asso-
ciated with a withdrawal syndrome.1 The
metabolism of doxepin is affected by cimeti-
dine (Tagamet); patients who take both
drugs should not take more than 3 mg of
doxepin per day. Low-dose doxepin does not
seem to be affected by other drugs that affect
the cytochrome P450 system. Silenor is a U.S.
Food and Drug Administration pregnancy
category C drug.1
TOLERABILITY
Silenor has an adverse effect profile com-
parable to that of placebo. In clinical trials
of 1,017 patients, approximately 1 percent
withdrew because of adverse effects.1 Rebound
insomnia and withdrawal symptoms have not
been reported. Next-day sedation, anticholin-
ergic effects, and memory impairment do not
occur at low dosages.2,3 The use of central ner-
vous system depressants, alcohol, and sedating
antihistamines may increase the sedative effect
of doxepin and should be avoided.1
EFFECTIVENESS 
Silenor has been studied mainly in older
patients with primary insomnia and dif-
ficulty falling asleep, frequent waking, or
sleep duration of less than 6.5 hours. In
sleep studies comparing 3-mg and 6-mg
doses for two nights, total sleep dura-
tion increased 25 to 38 minutes compared
with placebo.2,3 Time to sleep onset (sleep
latency) did not decrease significantly. The
benefit in younger adults does not seem to
be as pronounced.1 When given nightly for
up to three months, the 3-mg dose produces
consistent results without causing next-day
residual effects on cognitive performance;
the long-term effects of the 6-mg dose have
not been studied.4 No research has com-
pared Silenor with other hypnotics.
Silenor is a new low-dose formulation of the tricyclic antidepressant doxepin (which is typi-
cally taken as a 25- to 150-mg dose at bedtime). Low-dose doxepin is labeled for the treatment
of insomnia characterized by difficulty maintaining sleep. The exact mechanism by which the
medication exerts its sleep maintenance effect is unknown, but is thought to be antagonism
of histamine H1 receptors.1
Doxepin (Silenor) for Insomnia
DHIREN PATEL, PharmD, and JENNIFER D. GOLDMAN-LEVINE, PharmD
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts
STEPS new drug reviews
cover Safety, Tolerability,
Effectiveness, Price, and
Simplicity. Each indepen-
dent review is provided
by authors who have no
financial association with
the drug manufacturer.
The series coordinator for
AFP
is Allen F. Shaugh-
nessy, PharmD, Tufts
Universit y Family Medicine
Residency Program at
Cambridge Health Alli-
ance, Malden, Mass.
A collection of STEPS pub-
lished in
AFP
is available
at http://www.aafp.org/
afp/steps.
STEPS
New Drug Reviews
Drug Dosage Dose form Monthly cost*
Doxepin (Silenor) 3 to 6 mg daily 3-mg and 6-mg tablets $208
*—Price for 30 3-mg or 6-mg tablets at CVS Pharmacy on May 18, 2011.
Downloaded from the American Family Physician Web site at www.aafp.org/afp. Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Family Physicians. For the private, noncommercial use
of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved. Contact copyrights@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
STEPS
PRICE
Silenor costs approximately $208 for 30 3-mg
or 6-mg tablets. Less expensive formulations
of doxepin are available, such as a generic
oral solution (10 mg per mL; approximately
$24 per 120-mL bottle) and a generic 10-mg
capsule (approximately $20 for 90 capsules).
Pharmacists cannot substitute these products
for Silenor; the generic name must be used
on the prescription.
SIMPLICIT Y
Patients older than 65 years should begin
with a 3-mg dose, and increase to 6 mg if nec-
essary. In younger adults, the recommended
starting dose is 6 mg. Patients with hepatic
impairment or with a tendency for urinary
retention should start with the lower dose.
Doxepin should be taken within 30 minutes
before bedtime, but not within three hours of
a meal. Dependence has not been shown in
studies, and there are no limitations on the
duration or frequency of use.
Bottom Line
In older patients with primary insomnia,
Silenor can increase duration of sleep with-
out next-day effects. However, it does not
significantly decrease the time to sleep onset,
and it is less effective in younger adults. Less
expensive options for insomnia treatment are
available, including a generic oral solution of
doxepin and a generic 10-mg capsule.
Address correspondence to Dhiren Patel, PharmD, at
dhiren.patel1@mcphs.edu. Reprints are not available
from the author s.
Author disclosure : No relevant financial affiliations to
disclose.
REFERENCES
1. Silenor (doxepin) [prescribing information]. San Diego, Calif.:
Somaxon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2010. http://www.silenor.
com /pub /d ownlo ada shx?key= %2f wE CFQ %3d%3d.
Accessed November 1, 2010.
2. Roth T, Rogowski R, Hull S, et al. Efficacy and safety of
doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg in adults with primary
insomnia. Sleep. 2007;30(11):1555-1561.
3. Schar f M, Rogowski R, Hull S, et al. Efficacy and safety
of doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg in elderly patients
with primar y insomnia: a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled crossover study. J Clin Psychiatry.
2008;69 (10):1557-1564.
4. Krystal AD, Durrence HH, Scharf M, et al. Efficacy and
safety of doxepin 1 mg and 3 mg in a 12-week sleep labo-
ratory and outpatient trial of elderly subjects with chronic
primary insomnia. Sleep. 2010;33(11):1553-1561.
... Low-dose of doxepin does not affected by other drugs that affect the cytochrome P450 system. When given nightly for up to three months, the 3 mg concentration produces consistent results without causing next day residual effects on cognitive performance [8]. No evidence of carcinogenic potential was observed when doxepin was treated orally to mice for 26 weeks at concentration of 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg/kg/day. ...
... The remaining one-third of the companies that still exist in the open market went through turbulent times reflected by their name changes (Combinatorx, Biomedicine, Faust Therapeutics) or a drastic headcount reduction (Somaxon, which in the end of the unusually lengthy development phase became a one-man company to bring the repositioned drug silenor to approval) [8,9]. ...
Article
Drug repositioning is an innovation stream of pharmaceutical development that offers advantages for drug developers along with safer medicines for patients. Several drugs have been successfully repositioned to a new indication, with the most prominent of them being viagra and thalidomide, which have generated historically high revenues. In line with these developments, most of the recent articles and reviews on repositioning are focused on success stories, leaving behind the challenges that repositioned compounds have on the way to the clinic. Here, I analyze repositioning as a business opportunity for pharmaceutical companies, weighing both challenges and opportunities of repositioning. In addition, I suggest extended profiling as a lower-risk cost-effective repositioning model for pharmaceutical companies and elucidate the novel collaborative business opportunities that help to realize repositioning of shelved and marketed compounds.
... The remaining one-third of the companies that still exist in the open market went through turbulent times reflected by their name changes (Combinatorx, Biomedicine, Faust Therapeutics) or a drastic headcount reduction (Somaxon, which in the end of the unusually lengthy development phase became a one-man company to bring the repositioned drug silenor to approval) [8,9]. ...
Article
Recent success of companion diagnostics along with the increasing regulatory pressure for better identification of the target population has created an unprecedented incentive for drug discovery companies to invest in novel strategies for biomarker discovery. In parallel with the rapid advancement and clinical adoption of high-throughput technologies, a number of knowledge management and system biology approaches have been developed to analyze an ever increasing collection of OMICs data. This review discusses current biomarker discovery technologies highlighting challenges and opportunities of knowledge capturing and presenting a perspective of the future integrative modeling approaches as an emerging trend in biomarker prediction.
Article
Full-text available
to evaluate the efficacy and safety of doxepin 1 mg and 3 mg in elderly subjects with chronic primary insomnia. the study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for primary insomnia were randomized to 12 weeks of nightly treatment with doxepin (DXP) 1 mg (n = 77) or 3 mg (n = 82), or placebo (PBO; n = 81). Efficacy was assessed using polysomnography (PSG), patient reports, and clinician ratings. Objective efficacy data are reported for Nights (N) 1, 29, and 85; subjective efficacy data during Weeks 1, 4, and 12; and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale and Patient Global Impression (PGI) scale data after Weeks 2, 4, and 12 of treatment. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the study. DXP 3 mg led to significant improvement versus PBO on N1 in wake time after sleep onset (WASO; P < 0.0001; primary endpoint), total sleep time (TST; P < 0.0001), overall sleep efficiency (SE; P < 0.0001), SE in the last quarter of the night (P < 0.0001), and SE in Hour 8 (P < 0.0001). These improvements were sustained at N85 for all variables, with significance maintained for WASO, TST, overall SE, and SE in the last quarter of the night. DXP 3 mg significantly improved patient-reported latency to sleep onset (Weeks 1, 4, and 12), subjective TST (Weeks 1, 4, and 12), and sleep quality (Weeks 1, 4, and 12). Several global outcome-related variables were significantly improved, including the severity and improvement items of the CGI (Weeks 2, 4, and 12), and all 5 items of the PGI (Week 12; 4 items after Weeks 2 and 4). Significant improvements were observed for DXP 1 mg for several measures including WASO, TST, overall SE, and SE in the last quarter of the night at several time points. Rates of discontinuation were low, and the safety profiles were comparable across the 3 treatment groups. There were no significant next-day residual effects; additionally, there were no reports of memory impairment, complex sleep behaviors, anticholinergic effects, weight gain, or increased appetite. DXP 1 mg and 3 mg administered nightly to elderly chronic insomnia patients for 12 weeks resulted in significant and sustained improvements in most endpoints. These improvements were not accompanied by evidence of next-day residual sedation or other significant adverse effects. DXP also demonstrated improvements in both patient- and physician-based ratings of global insomnia outcome. The efficacy of DXP at the doses used in this study is noteworthy with respect to sleep maintenance and early morning awakenings given that these are the primary sleep complaints of the elderly. This study, the longest placebo-controlled, double-blind, polysomnographic trial of nightly pharmacotherapy for insomnia in the elderly, provides the best evidence to date of the sustained efficacy and safety of an insomnia medication in older adults.
Article
Full-text available
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of doxepin 1, 3, and 6 mg in insomnia patients. Adults (18-64 y) with chronic primary insomnia (DSM-IV) were randomly assigned to one of four sequences of 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg of doxepin, and placebo in a crossover study. Treatment periods consisted of 2 polysomnographic assessment nights with a 5-day or 12-day drug-free interval between periods. Efficacy was assessed using polysomnography (PSG) and patient-reported measures. Safety analyses included measures of residual sedation and adverse events. Sixty-seven patients were randomized. Wake time during sleep, the a priori defined primary endpoint, was statistically significantly improved at the doxepin 3 mg and 6 mg doses versus placebo. All three doses had statistically significant improvements versus placebo for PSG-defined wake after sleep onset, total sleep time, and overall sleep efficiency (SE). SE in the final third-of-the-night also demonstrated statistically significant improvement at all doses. The doxepin 6 mg dose significantly reduced subjective latency to sleep onset. All three doxepin doses had a safety profile comparable to placebo. There were no statistically significant differences in next-day residual sedation, and sleep architecture was generally clinically preserved. In adults with primary insomnia, doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg was well-tolerated and produced improvement in objective and subjective sleep maintenance and duration endpoints that persisted into the final hour of the night. The side-effect profile was comparable to placebo, with no reported anticholinergic effects, no memory impairment, and no significant hangover/next-day residual effects. These data demonstrate that doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg is efficacious in improving the sleep of patients with chronic primary insomnia.
Conference Paper
Objectives: Evaluate efficacy and safety of the histamine-H, antagonist doxepin at doses of 1mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg in elderly adults with primary insomnia, Design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. crossover design Was used in this population of elderly adults with primary insomnia (DSM-IV). Each treatment period consisted of 2 polysomnouraphic (PSG) assessment nights with a 5- or 12-day drug-free interval between periods. The study was conducted from September 2004 to January 2005. Setting: Sleep laboratories in 11 sleep centers in the United States. Participants: Elderly adults with primary insomnia. Intervention: Doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg. Measurements: Efficacy was assessed using PSG and patient-reported measures. Results: Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned. All 3 doxepin closes produced dose-related significant improvements in PSG-determined wake time during sleep (p < .0001), wake time after sleep onset (p < .0001), total sleep time (p < .0001), and overall sleep efficiency (p < .0001) versus placebo. At the 3-mg and 6-mg doses, sleep efficiency was significantly improved during all thirds of the night (p < .05) There was a dose-related decrease in patient-reported sleep latency, with the 6-mg dose achieving statistical significance in latency to sleep onset (p = .0181). The pattern of the remaining subjective efficacy results was consistent with PSG. All 3 doxepin (loses had side effect profiles comparable to placebo, with no spontaneously reported anticholinergic effects, no memory impairment, and no significant next-day residual effects. Conclusions: In this 2-night study of elderly adults with primary insomnia, doxepin doses of 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg were well tolerated and produced significant improvement in objective and subjective sleep maintenance and duration endpoints that persisted into the final hour of the night. Positive effects on patient-reported sleep onset were observed at the highest dose. All 3 doxepin doses had a safety profile comparable to placebo. These data demonstrate that doxepin was efficacious in improving sleep in elderly adults. (J Clin Psychiatry 2008;69:1557-1564)