Content uploaded by Raymond J Davey
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Raymond J Davey
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
OBSERVATIONS
Increasing the
Low-Glucose Alarm
of a Continuous
Glucose Monitoring
System Prevents
Exercise-Induced
Hypoglycemia
Without Triggering
Any False Alarms
The use of continuous glucose mon-
itoring systems (CGMSs) with low-
glucose alarms is advocated as a
means to decrease the risk of hypoglyce-
mia in type 1 diabetes. Unfortunately,
marked mismatches between CGMS
readings and actual blood glucose (BG)
concentrations limit the usefulness of
CGMS in preventing hypoglycemia (1).
Although we showed recently that raising
the alarm level to compensate for this
mismatch decreases the incidence and
duration of hypoglycemic episodes, this
results in an unacceptably high rate of
false alarms (1), defined as an alarm trig-
gered when BG levels are greater than the
alarm threshold. This is an important is-
sue because repeated exposure to false
alarms can discourage individuals from
using their CGMSs (2). Given that CGMSs
overestimate BG levels when they rapidly
decline (3,4), we propose that raising the
CGMS alarm in anticipation of a rapid fall
in glycemia could be one condition where
the incidence of hypoglycemia may be re-
duced without triggering any false alarms.
To test this hypothesis, four males
and four females with uncomplicated
type 1 diabetes and unimpaired aware-
ness of hypoglycemia (age 31.5 66.9
years; BMI 24.8 62.5 kg/m
2
;VO
2peak
43.2 64.9 mL /kg /min; diabetes duration
10.6 68.3 years; HbA
1c
7.5 61.1%;
mean 6SD) wore a CGMS (abdomen;
Paradigm 722 Real-Time; Medtronic,
Northridge, CA) and attended the labora-
tory within 1.9 60.2 h of breakfast and
their usual insulin bolus (8.4 65.1 units).
When BG levels fell to between 8–10 mM,
participants exercised for 30 min (40%
VO
2peak
) on a cycle ergometer to induce a
rapid fall in glycemia (5). During and for
2-h postexercise, the CGMS alarm was ei-
ther switched off or set to 4.0 or 5.5 mM,
with each treatment administered on con-
secutive mornings following a random-
ized counterbalanced design. Participants
were treated with carbohydrates when an
alarm was accompanied by a confirmed
BG level #the alarm threshold or in
response to the verbal expression of hypo-
glycemic symptoms. One-way repeated-
measures ANOVA and Bonferroni post
hoc tests compared differences in BG and
CGMS levels. Hypoglycemic events were
compared using a Fisher exact squared
test.
In response to exercise, all partici-
pants in both the no alarm and 4.0 mM
alarm conditions experienced an episode
of hypoglycemia, defined as a confirmed
BG level ,3.8 mM (ABL 700 series; Radi-
ometer, Copenhagen, Denmark), with no
cases of false alarms in the 4.0 mM treat-
ment. In comparison, the 5.5 mM alarm
significantly reduced by half the proportion
of hypoglycemic episodes (P50.048) with
no cases of false alarms. When the 5.5 mM
alarm was triggered, CGMS overestimated
BG values by 1.6 60.3 mM.
Our findings show for the first time
that when glycemia is falling, the use of
CGMS alarms can provide an effective
means to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia
without the inconvenience of false alarms.
Although setting the CGMS alarm at 5.5
mM did not prevent all cases of hypogly-
cemia because of the large overestimation
of BG levels by the CGMS, this mismatch
had the benefit of contributing to the
absence of false alarms. In conclusion,
future diabetes management guidelines
should highlight the benefits of using
CGMS alarms for the prevention of hypo-
glycemia when a rapid fall in glycemia is
anticipated.
KATHERINE E. ISCOE,MSC
1
RAYMOND J. DAVEY,PHD
1,2
PAUL A. FOURNIER,PHD
1
From
1
The School of Sport Science, Exercise &
Health, The University of Western Australia,
Perth, Western Australia, Australia; and the
2
Telethon Institute for Child Health Research,
Centre for Child Health Research, The University
of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia,
Australia.
Corresponding author: Katherine E. Iscoe, iscoek01@
student.uwa.edu.au.
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-2243
© 2011 by the American Diabetes Association.
Readers may use this article as long as the work is
properly cited, the use is educational and not for
profit, and the work is not altered. See http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for
details.
Acknowledgments—K.E.I. has received
speaking fees from Medtronic. No other
potential conflicts of interest relevant to this
article were reported.
K.E.I. collected the data and wrote and
edited the manuscript. R.J.D. contributed to
the study design and reviewed and edited the
manuscript. P.A.F. supervised the study, con-
tributed to the study design, and reviewed and
edited the manuscript.
Parts of this study were presented at the
70th Scientific Sessions of the American Di-
abetes Association, Orlando, Florida, 25–29
June 2010.
The authors acknowledge Medtronic
Australasia, which provided the CGMSs and
glucose sensors for the completion of this
study.
cccccccccccccccccccccccc
References
1. Davey RJ, Jones TW, Fournier PA. Effect of
short-term use of a continuous glucose
monitoring system with a real-time glucose
display and a low glucose alarm on inci-
dence and duration of hypoglycaemia in a
home setting in type 1 diabetes mellitus.
J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:1457–1464
2. Buckingham B, Block J, Burdick J, et al.;
Diabetes Research in Children Network.
Response to nocturnal alarms using a real-
time glucose sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther
2005;7:440–447
3. Boyne MS, Silver DM, Kaplan J, Saudek
CD. Timing of changes in interstitial and
venous blood glucose measured with a
continuous subcutaneous glucose sensor.
Diabetes 2003;52:2790–2794
4. Davey RJ, Low CY, Fournier PA. The con-
tribution of an intrinsic lag of CGMS to
differences in measured and actual glucose
concentrations changing at variable rates in
vitro. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:1393–
1399
5. GuelfiKJ, Jones TW, Fournier PA. The de-
cline in blood glucose levels is less with in-
termittent high-intensity compared with
moderate exercise in individuals with type 1
diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1289–
1294
care.diabetesjournals.org DIABETES CAR E,VOLUME 34, JUNE 2011 e109
ONLINE LETTERS