ArticlePDF Available

MicroRNA Expression in Selected Carcinomas of the Gastrointestinal Tract

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) comprise a recently discovered class of small, 18-25 nucleotide, noncoding RNA sequences that regulate gene expression at the posttranscriptional level by binding to and inhibiting the translation of target messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Characteristic patterns of miRNA expression have been described in several malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract, and numerous investigators have demonstrated interactions between specific miRNA species and target oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes. It is clear that miRNAs play an important role in regulating expression of a number of genes involved in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis, and, thus, these molecules may represent either diagnostic markers of, or therapeutic targets for, some types of malignancy. This paper summarizes the literature regarding miRNA expression in carcinomas of the colon, pancreas, and liver and discusses some of the mechanisms by which these molecules participate in gastrointestinal oncogenesis.
Content may be subject to copyright.
SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
Pathology Research International
Volume 2011, Article ID 124608, 10 pages
doi:10.4061/2011/124608
Review Article
MicroRNA Expression in Selected Carcinomas of
the Gastrointestinal Tract
Nicole C. Panarelli and Rhonda K. Yantiss
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
Correspondence should be addressed to Rhonda K. Yantiss, rhy2001@med.cornell.edu
Received 15 September 2010; Accepted 7 January 2011
Academic Editor: Wade Samowitz
Copyright © 2011 N. C. Panarelli and R. K. Yantiss. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) comprise a recently discovered class of small, 18–25 nucleotide, noncoding RNA sequences that regulate
gene expression at the posttranscriptional level by binding to and inhibiting the translation of target messenger RNAs (mRNAs).
Characteristic patterns of miRNA expression have been described in several malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract, and
numerous investigators have demonstrated interactions between specific miRNA species and target oncogenes or tumor-
suppressor genes. It is clear that miRNAs play an important role in regulating expression of a number of genes involved in
gastrointestinal carcinogenesis, and, thus, these molecules may represent either diagnostic markers of, or therapeutic targets for,
some types of malignancy. This paper summarizes the literature regarding miRNA expression in carcinomas of the colon, pancreas,
and liver and discusses some of the mechanisms by which these molecules participate in gastrointestinal oncogenesis.
1. Introduction
MicroRNAs are small, 18–25 nucleotide, noncoding RNA
sequences that regulate gene expression at the posttran-
scriptional level by binding to and inhibiting translation
of target messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Over 1,000 human
miRNAs have been identified to date, and many have tissue-
specific expression profiles. Several studies have shown that
miRNAs demonstrate characteristic patterns of expression in
cancers. Some species show overexpression in cancers relative
to nonneoplastic tissues, whereas others display decreased
expression, similar to oncogenes and tumor suppressor
genes, respectively [19]. Emerging data indicate that virtu-
ally every type of human malignancy displays dysregulated
miRNA expression, and, in fact, potential applications of
miRNA expression profiling to the diagnosis, prognosis, and
treatment of gastrointestinal cancers have been the subject
of extensive recent investigation. Some investigators have
suggested that panels of miRNAs may be used for diagnostic
purposes among patients with suspected gastrointestinal
malignancies, and a subset of these represent prognostically
important markers or even potential therapeutic targets.
The purpose of this paper is to provide the readership with a
comprehensive overview of published data regarding miRNA
expression in gastrointestinal malignances with emphasis on
colorectal, pancreatic, and hepatocellular carcinomas.
2. Overview
MicroRNAs were first recognized as regulatory agents of gene
expression in 1993 when they were discovered in Caenorhab-
ditis elegans [10]. Each miRNA molecule can potentially bind
to either the 3-or5
-untranslated region (UTR) of hundreds
of mRNAs by sequence complementarity. Binding of miRNA
to mRNA suppresses expression by either inducing mRNA
degradation or inhibiting translational machinery. Primary
miRNA transcripts within the nucleus are processed by the
nuclear RNAse III complex, Drosha, to become miRNA
precursors termed “pre-miRNAs”. Pre-miRNAs are exported
to the cytoplasm where the endoribonuclease, Dicer, pro-
cesses them into mature miRNAs. These mature molecules
are subsequently integrated into the RNA-induced silencing
complex (RISC), the functional unit of which inhibits mRNA
translation [11,12].
2Pathology Research International
A growing body of evidence indicates that a subset of
miRNAs are functionally important to the development of
human cancers. Many investigators have identified tumor-
specific miRNA signatures that accurately distinguish malig-
nancies from benign tissues in multiple dierent sites, sug-
gesting that some miRNAs are oncogenic, and their potency
depends on other gene mutations that are present in the
tumor. Manipulation of miRNAs in cancer cell lines directly
aects cell proliferation and apoptosis, and many researchers
have demonstrated links between miRNA dysregulation
and cell signaling pathway abnormalities [9,1315]. Thus,
miRNAs comprise a recently described class of molecules
that contributes to cancer formation through interactions
with mRNAs derived from oncogenes and tumor suppressor
genes.
3. MicroRNAs in Colorectal Cancer
MicroRNA expression in colon cancer and nonneoplastic
colonic tissues has been extensively studied (Tab le 1). Cum-
mins et al. performed serial analysis of gene expression
(miRAGE) in colorectal cancer cell lines and identified 133
miRAGE tags that corresponded to previously unrecognized
miRNAs. They also detected dierential expression of 52
miRAGE tags in colon cancer cells relative to normal colonic
epithelium. These results provided evidence that the number
of miRNAs in the human genome is likely much larger than
had been previously predicted and that their expression is
frequently dysregulated in colorectal cancer [25]. Subsequent
studies provided data indicating that miRNA dysregulation
is important to colon cancer development. Bandres et al.
studied expression of 156 miRNAs in colon cancer cell
linesaswellaspairedtumoralandnontumoraltissues.
They identified a subset of 13 dierentially expressed species
[16]. Wang et al. used miRNA microarrays to identify 12
miRNAs that were upregulated in colon cancer and 2 that
were downregulated compared to nonneoplastic colonic
tissues [17].
The expression levels of several miRNA species have been
associated with clinicopathologic features and prognosis in
colon cancer. MicroRNA-31 was first identified by Bandres
et al.as one of the most substantially dysregulated miRNAs
in colon cancer cell lines and resected colon cancers. The
authors of that study found that miR-31 expression was sig-
nificantly higher in stage IV tumors compared to stage II car-
cinomas [16]. Wang et al. later demonstrated an association
between miR-31 upregulation and advanced TNM stage as
well as deeper invasion of the primary tumor [26]. Slaby et al.
failed to identify any correlation between miR-31 expression
and tumor stage in their analysis of 29 colon carcinomas,
but they did note that miR-31 levels were significantly higher
in high-grade carcinomas, compared to low-grade tumors
[19]. MicroRNA-21, a species with antiapoptotic properties,
is dysregulated in many human cancers including tumors
of the head and neck, lung, breast, prostate, brain, thyroid,
pancreas, stomach, colon, and esophagus [9,2732]. Its high
expression has been associated with regional lymph node
and distant metastases in colorectal cancer patients [19].
Schetter et al. analyzed 197 colonic adenocarcinomas using
microarray assays and qRT-PCR and found that high miR-
21 levels predicted poor survival prognosis and higher TNM
stage [21]. This same group later demonstrated a relationship
between high miR-21 expression and increased levels of
IL-6, a proinflammatory cytokine and lower levels of IL-
12a in colonic adenocarcinomas. They postulated that IL-
6 drives miR-21 expression whereas IL-12a is a negatively
regulated target of miR-21 [21]. Presumably, IL-12a activity
is important for host resistance to malignancy. Thus, its
downregulation by miR-21 may account for some of the
negative impact of miR-21 on prognosis among patients with
colorectal cancer. Finally, miR-145 is normally expressed in
colonic epithelium, but it shows decreased expression in
colon cancer [23]. Decreased miR-145 is more commonly
observed in tumors of the proximal colon and those of large
size (>50 mm) [22]. Akao et al. found decreased expression
of miR-143 and miR-145 in adenomas and carcinomas, but
they did not find any correlation between their expression
and any other clinical prognostic factors, indicating that
these miRNAs may primarily contribute to initiation, but
not progression, of colonic tumorigenesis. Notably, synthetic
miR-143 has a suppressive eect on growth of xenografted
tumors comprised of human colon cancer cells [33].
Expression of a number of other miRNA species has
been reported to correlate with clinicopathologic features
and prognosis among patients with colon cancer. Schepeler
et al. found that stage II colon cancers with high miR-320
or miR-498 expression showed significant dierences with
respect to progression-free survival compared to tumors with
low expression of these species [18]. High expression of
miR-200c has also been reported to predict shorter survival
and is associated with frequent p53 mutations [20]. Diaz
et al. studied 110 patients with colon cancer and reported
that downregulation of miR-106a predicted shorter disease-
free survival [34]. Sarver et al. identified 6 miRNAs (HS-
29, miR-135b, miR-32, miR-33, miR-542-5p, and miR-96)
that were more highly expressed in stage IV microsatellite
stable cancers relative to stage II tumors [22]. Huang et
al. studied nonneoplastic colonic mucosa adjacent to colon
cancers in three patients with lymph node metastases and
three patients with node negative disease. They found 6-fold
higher expression of miR-137 in lymph node positive tumors
compared to node-negative cases [35]. Finally, Yantiss et al.
studied miRNA expression in colorectal cancers obtained
from 24 patients <40 years of age and 45 patients >40 years
old. They found significantly increased expression of miR-21,
miR-20a, miR-145, miR-181b, and miR-203 in tumors from
young patients compared to older adults [36].
Data from several studies have documented interactions
between specific miRNA species, oncogenes, and tumor
suppressor genes relevant to colonic carcinogenesis. Chen
et al. observed an inverse correlation between miR-143 and
KRAS expression in 13 colonic adenocarcinomas. They also
used semiquantitative RT-PCR to show that KRAS transcript
levels were decreased in cell lines transfected with pre-
miR-143 whereas addition of anti-miR-143 oligonucleotides
increased KRAS transcript levels. These findings suggest
that miR-143 downregulation in colon carcinoma promotes
cancer cell growth by disinhibiting KRAS translation [37].
Pathology Research International 3
Tab le 1: Summary of microRNA expression in colorectal cancer.
Study Dierentially expressed
miRNAs (no./total)
Most significantly overexpressed miRNAs
in colorectal cancer
Most significantly underexpressed
miRNAs in colorectal cancer
Bandres et al. [16] 13/156 miR-31, miR-96, miR-133b, miR-135b,
miR-145, miR-183
Wang et al . [17] 14/723
miR-106b, miR-135b, miR-18a, miR-18b,
miR-196b, miR-19a, miR-224, miR-335,
miR-424, miR-20a, miR-301b, miR-734a
miR-378, miR-378
Schepeler et al. [18] 60/315 miR-20a, miR-510, miR-92, miR-513 miR-145, miR-455, miR-484, miR-101
Slaby et al. [19] 4/4 miR-31, miR-21 miR-145, miR-143
Xi et al. [20] 4/10 miR-15b, miR-181b, miR-191, miR-200c
Schetter et al. [21] 37/389 miR-20a, miR-21, miR-106a, miR-181b,
miR-203
Sarver et al. [22] 39/735 miR-135b, miR-96, miR-182, miR-182,
miR-183
miR-1, miR-133a, miR-30a-3p,
miR-30a-5p, miR-20b, miR-363
Michael et al. [23] 2/28 miR-143, miR-145
Guo et al. [24] 45/262
miR-93, miR-92, miR-520h, miR-508,
miR-505, miR-449, miR-429, miR-384,
miR-373, miR-34c, miR-326, miR-25,
miR-224, miR-210, miR-200a, miR-19b,
miR-19a, miR-18a, miR-183, miR-182,
miR-181b, miR-181a, miR-181c,
miR-17-5p, miR-148a, miR-141,
miR-130b, miR-128a, miR-106b,
miR-106a, let-7d
miR-96, miR-485-5p, miR-422b,
miR-342, miR-214, miR-199a,
miR-195, miR-150, miR-145, miR-143,
miR-133a, miR-126, miR-125b,
miR-100
MicroRNAs also impact the Wnt signaling pathway. The
adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene normally functions
as a tumor suppressor by regulating Wnt signaling. In
the absence of functional APC,β-catenin accumulates in
the cytoplasm and is transported to the nucleus, where it
facilitates transcription of genes involved in proliferation,
such as cyclin D1. Germline APC mutations are responsible
for familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome, and biallelic
inactivation of APC occurs in the majority of sporadic
colonic adenocarcinomas [3841]. Transduction of colon
cancer cell lines with miR-135a and miR-135b results in
diminished APC expression and accumulation of β-catenin.
Colon cancers with high levels of miR-135a and miR-135b
show lower APC expression. In this situation, qRT-PCR
data demonstrate reduced APC mRNA, suggesting that miR-
135a and miR-135b regulate the Wnt signaling pathway by
promoting mRNA decay [42].
MicroRNA-34, a species that is lost in multiple types
of cancer including those of the colon and pancreas,
is inducible by p53, and its overexpression is associated
with p53 eects including cell cycle arrest and apoptosis
[43]. Guo et al. found that restoration of miR-126, a
species that shows low-to-absent expression in colon cancer,
impedes cancer cell growth by targeting the p85B subunit of
phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K). Phosphatidylinositol-
3-kinase activates AKT, a protein kinase involved in the
PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, which triggers a variety of
downstream responses related to cell growth, proliferation,
and motility. Presumably, loss of miR-126 removes a critical
checkpoint in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and facilitates
tumor growth [24]. Continued research will likely uncover
additional regulatory roles for miRNAs in colorectal carcino-
genesis and other neoplasms throughout the gastrointestinal
tract.
Most colorectal cancers are characterized by aneuploidy,
allelic imbalance, and mutations in KRAS,TP53,andAPC
although approximately 15% of sporadic colonic adeno-
carcinomas develop via microsatellite instability (MSI) and
have defective DNA mismatch repair mechanisms. Such
tumors are often located in the proximal colon, show high-
grade histology, and contain infiltrating lymphocytes. They
are generally diploid and have a better prognosis than
non-MSI tumors, but they are probably less responsive to
conventional 5-flourouracil-based chemotherapy [44,45].
Patients with germline mutations in one of the mismatch
repair genes (MLH1,MSH2,MSH6,andPMS2)areat
risk for acquired mutations of the second allele and devel-
opment of heritable microsatellite unstable carcinomas of
the gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and gynecologic tracts,
termed Lynch syndrome. Sporadic colonic carcinomas with
MSI may also occur, but in this situation, tumorigenesis
results from biallelic epigenetic methylation and silencing of
MLH1. Several authors have studied dierences in miRNA
expression patterns between microsatellite stable (MSS)
colon cancers and those with MSI-H (Tabl e 2). Lanza et al.
used microarray data to profile 23 MSS and 16 sporadic
MSI-H colon cancers. They identified 72 mRNAs and 14
miRNAs that were dierentially expressed between these
two tumor types and used their combined expression to
distinguish between MSS and MSI-H cancers [14]. Sarver
et al. studied expression of 735 miRNAs in 12 MSI-H and
68 MSS colon tumors and found that miR-552, miR-592,
4Pathology Research International
Tab le 2: MicroRNA expression in microsatellite stable versus microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer.
Study MSS colorectal cancers MSI-H colorectal cancers
Overexpressed Underexpressed Overexpressed Underexpressed
Schepeler et al. [18]miR-20a, miR-510, miR-92,
miR-513
miR-142-3p, miR-212,
miR-146b, miR-217
miR-492, miR-20a,
miR-432, miR-21
miR-145, miR-455,
miR-484, miR-101
Sarver et al. [22]miR-552, miR-592,
miR-181c, miR-196b miR-625, miR-31
Lanza et al. [14]
miR-215, miR-192, miR-191,
miR-203, miR-32, miR-17,
miR-25, miR-106a, miR-92-1,
miR-92-2, miR-93-1, miR-20
miR-223, miR-155
miR-181c, and miR-196b were significantly increased in MSS
tumors relative to MSI-H tumors, whereas miR-625 and
miR-31 levels were higher in MSI-H tumors [22]. Schepeler
et al. compared miRNA expression in 37 MSS relative to 12
MSI-H cancers and identified a 4-miRNA signature (miR-
142-3p, miR-212, miR-151, and miR-144) that predicted
MSI with 81% specificity and 92% sensitivity [18]. These
data indicate that the type of genetic instability in colorectal
cancer is reflected at the miRNA level.
5-Flourouracil (5-FU) has been a mainstay of colorectal
cancer therapy for the past several decades [46]. Some
patients have a suboptimal response to therapy for unclear
reasons, so identification of molecular markers that predict
the likelihood of a therapeutic response is important. In
vitro studies evaluating miRNA expression in colon cancer
cell lines treated with 5-FU have generated promising
data regarding the potential use of miRNAs as markers
of chemosensitivity. Borralho et al. showed that stable
expression of miR-143, a species known to be downregulated
in colon cancer, was associated with increased death in cell
lines after exposure to 5-FU [23,47]. Others have applied
this concept to colon cancer resection specimens. Nakajima
et al. used qRT-PCR to study miRNA expression in residual
or recurrent colon cancers from 46 patients who were treated
with oral 5-FU alone or in combination with cisplatin.
Twenty-seven patients who experienced complete disease
remission showed a partial response or maintained stable
disease after treatment had significantly lower levels of let-
7g and miR-181b, compared to 19 patients who suered
disease progression [48]. Schetter et al. analyzed associations
between miR-21 expression and therapeutic outcomes in
56 stage II or stage III colorectal cancer patients treated
with 5-FU. High miR-21 expression was associated with
worse overall survival, lending preliminary support to the
notion that miR-21 overexpression predicts a poor response
to therapy [21]. Boni et al. investigated associations between
polymorphisms in miRNA-containing genomic regions and
genes related to miRNA biogenesis and clinical outcome in
patients with metastatic colon cancer who were treated with
5-FU and irinotecan. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in
the miR-26-a-1 gene and 5UTR of pre-miR-100 correlated
with better overall survival and disease control, respectively,
and both were associated with a prolonged interval to pro-
gression [49]. The mechanisms by which miRNAs modulate
ecacy of therapy are not understood, but these early data
support the hypothesis that changes in miRNA expression
levels and in the miRNA genome impact tumor response to
therapy.
4. MicroRNAs in Pancreatic Neoplasia
Aberrant miRNA expression has been described in pancre-
atic ductal adenocarcinoma and benign pancreatobiliary dis-
ease (Tabl e 3). Early studies exploited dierences in miRNA
expression patterns to distinguish between benign and
malignant pancreatic diseases. Bloomston et al. examined
65 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and benign adjacent
pancreatic tissue, as well as 42 cases of chronic pancreatitis
for miRNA expression. They found 21 miRNAs to be dysreg-
ulated in cancer compared to benign tissues and noted that a
panel of 11 miRNAs (miR-148a, miR-148b, miR-155, miR-
181a, miR-181b, miR-181b-1, miR-181c, miR-181d, miR-
21, miR-221, and miR-375) distinguished pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis and normal pan-
creatic tissue [49]. Lee et al. analyzed 28 pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinomas and 21 nonneoplastic pancreatic tissues
and found miR-155, miR-181b, miR-181c, miR-21, and miR-
221 to be among the top 20 of 100 miRNAs overexpressed
in pancreatic cancer [31]. Szafranska et al. identified 26
dysregulated miRNAs in pancreatic adenocarcinoma using
resection specimens and pancreatic cancer cell lines. They
reported that miR-196a upregulation combined with miR-
217 downregulation reliably distinguished pancreatic cancer
from benign pancreas and chronic pancreatitis [50]. In a later
study, this signature correctly identified malignancy in 9/10
fine needle aspiration biopsies of pancreatic cancer [51].
The roles of dysregulated miRNAs in neoplastic pancre-
atic lesions have also been examined. du Rieu et al. used qRT-
PCR to study miRNA expression in pancreatic intraepithelial
neoplasia (PanIN) samples from human and mouse pancreas
and found that levels of miR-21, miR-221, miR-22, and let-
7a increased in the progression of PanIN to carcinoma [52].
Dilhoet al. found that strong miR-21 expression by in situ
hybridization was associated with decreased survival among
patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic carcinoma
[53]. Ikenaga et al. used qRT-PCR to evaluate miR-203
levels in resection specimens from patients with pancreatic
ductal adenocarcinoma (n=113), chronic pancreatitis
(n=20), and samples of nondiseased pancreas (n=8) and
found higher expression of miR-203 in pancreatic cancer.
Pathology Research International 5
Tab le 3: Summary of microRNA expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Study Dierentially expressed
miRNAs (no./total)
Most significantly overexpressed
miRNAs compared with normal
controls and/or chronic pancreatitis
Most significantly underexpressed
miRNAs compared with normal
controls and/or chronic pancreatitis
Bloomston et al. [30] 46/326
miR-221, miR-181a, miR-155,
miR-210, miR-213, miR-181b,
miR-222, miR-181b-2, miR-21,
miR-181b-1, miR-181c, miR-220,
miR-181d, miR-223, miR-100-1/2,
miR-125a, miR-143, miR-10a,
miR-146, miR-99, miR-100,
miR-199a-1, miR-10b, miR-199a-2,
miR-107, miR-103-2, miR-125b-1,
miR-205, miR-23b, miR-23a, miR-96,
miR-34, miR-497, miR-203, miR-453,
miR-92, miR-93, miR-21
miR-148a, miR-148b, miR-375,
miR-494, miR-483, miR-339,
miR-218-2, miR-409-3p
Lee et al. [31] 100/222
miR-221, miR-424, miR-301, miR-100,
miR-376a, miR-125b-1, miR-21,
miR-16-1, miR-181a, miR-181c,
miR-92-1, miR-15b, miR-155, let-7f-1,
miR-212, miR-107, miR-24-1,
miR-24-2, let-7d
miR-345, miR-142-p, miR-139
Szafranska et al. [50] 26/377
miR-205, miR-143, miR-145,
miR-146a, miR-148a, miR-196b,
miR-93, miR-31, miR-210, miR-196a,
miR-18a, miR-203, miR-150, miR-155,
miR-221, miR-222, miR-223, miR-224
miR-29c, miR-216, miR-217, miR-375,
miR-148a, miR-96, miR-148b,
miR-141, miR-130b
du Rieu et al. [52]7/7
miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, miR-200,
miR-205, miR-29c let-7a
Results of a multivariate analysis showed miR-203 expression
to be an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients
who had undergone complete tumor resection [54]. Wang
et al. investigated expression of miR-21, -210, -155, and
196a by qRT-PCR in the sera of 49 patients with pancreatic
adenocarcinoma and 36 healthy controls and found higher
expression of all four markers in sera of pancreatic cancer
patients [55]. In a later study, Kong et al. analyzed serum
levels of miR-196a, miR-21, and miR-155 in 35 patients
with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 15 patients with chronic
pancreatitis, and 15 healthy controls. They found that higher
miR-21 expression distinguished cancer patients from those
with chronic pancreatitis and healthy subjects, whereas miR-
155 and miR-196a discriminated between patients with
chronic pancreatitis and healthy controls. They also noted
that serum miR-196a levels were significantly higher in
patients with unresectable cancer than in those amenable to
surgery and that higher miR-196a levels predicted shorter
survival in pancreatic cancer patients [56]. Others have
shown increased miR-196a expression to be associated with
a 2-year survival of 17%, compared to 64% among tumors
with low expression of this marker [30].
The relative tissue-specificity of miRNAs makes them
attractive targets for molecular therapy among patients with
pancreatic cancer. Park et al. analyzed the eects of miR-21
and miR-221 antisense oligonucleotides on pancreatic cancer
cell lines and found that treated cells showed increased
apoptosis and cell cycle arrest compared to cells treated
with control oligonucleotides. MicroRNA-21 targets two
tumorsuppressormolecules,PTENandRECK,bothof
which were found to be increased in extracts from cell
lines treated with antisense oligonucleotides to miR-21.
Similarly, p27, the target of miR-221, increased when this
molecule was inhibited. Park et al. also found that cells
pretreated with antisense sequences against miR-21 and
miR-221 showed decreased viability by colorimetric analysis
following gemcitabine treatment compared to those treated
with control oligonucleotides [57].
Few studies have investigated miRNA expression in
pancreatic endocrine and acinar tumors. Roldo et al.
performed microarray and northern blot analyses of 40
endocrine tumors, 4 acinar cell carcinomas, and 12 samples
of nonneoplastic pancreas. They found that stable expression
of miR-103 and miR-107, in combination with a lack of
miR-155 expression, discriminated all tumor samples from
nonneoplastic tissues. They also identified 10 miRNAs that
distinguished endocrine from acinar tumors and 28 miRNA
species that were aberrantly increased in both tumor types
[29]. These preliminary data suggest that altered miRNA
expression occurs in endocrine and acinar neoplasms of the
pancreas.
5. MicroRNAs in Liver Disease
Early studies evaluating miRNA expression in hepatocellular
carcinoma identified approximately 69 dysregulated species
6Pathology Research International
Tab le 4: Summary of microRNA expression in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Study Dierentially expressed
miRNAs (no./total)
Most significantly overexpressed
miRNAs compared with nonneoplastic
liver (no disease or chronic viral
hepatitis)
Most significantly underexpressed
miRNAs compared with nonneoplastic
liver (no disease or chronic viral
hepatitis)
Murakami et al. [58] 7/180 miR-18, miR-224 miR-199a, miR-195, miR-199,
miR-200a, miR-125a
Li et al. [59] 84/509 miR-106b, miR-15b, miR-18a,
miR-221, miR-222, miR-224 miR-125b, miR-101
Ladeiro et al. [67] 130/250 miR-224, miR-200c, miR-203, miR-21,
miR-222, miR-10b miR-422b, miR-122a
Varnholt et al. [60] 29/80 miR-122, miR-100, miR-10a miR-198, miR-145
Li et al. [75]8/8
miR-17-5p, miR-18a, miR-19a,
miR-20a, miR-92-1, miR-106b,
miR-93, miR-25
Pineau et al. [61] 12/215
miR-106b, miR-21, miR-210, miR-210,
miR-221, miR-222, miR-224, miR-34a,
miR-425, miR-519a, miR-93, miR-96
let-7c
(Tabl e 4)[5863]. Many of those miRNAs, including miR-
122, miR-221, and miR-222, were later recognized as car-
cinogenic catalysts and prognostic markers in hepatocellular
carcinoma. MicroRNA-122 is the most abundant miRNA in
hepatic parenchyma and is relatively specific for hepatocyte
dierentiation, showing rare expression outside of liver [64
66]. Downregulation of miR-122 is frequently observed in
hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma cell
lines treated with miR-122 oligonucleotides show increased
apoptosis and decreased viability [58,59,6772]. Coulouarn
et al. correlated miR-122 tissue levels with the clinicopatho-
logic features of 64 hepatocellular carcinomas and found
that low expression of this marker predicted shorter survival,
high-grade histology, and large tumor size. They also noted
that loss of miR-122 was associated with higher expression
of genes involved in cell motility, angiogenesis, hypoxia, and
epithelial-mesenchymal transition [73]. Tsai et al. reported
lower levels of miR-122 in hepatocellular carcinomas with
intrahepatic metastases compared to solitary tumors [74].
The roles of microRNA species in hepatocellular car-
cinogenesis and their molecular targets are under cur-
rent investigation. Wong et al. found that high miR-222
levels correlated with advanced tumor stage and shorter
overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
independent of stage. They also noted PI3K/AKT/mTOR
pathway inhibition occurred in hepatocellular carcinoma cell
lines transfected with anti-miR-222 [62]. MicroRNA-221,
another frequently dysregulated species in hepatocellular
carcinoma, participates in the modulation of key molecules
related to hepatocarcinogenesis. Pineau et al. found that
expression levels of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor,
p27, and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway regulator, DDIT4,
were decreased in liver cancer cell lines that overexpressed
miR-221 [61]. Gramantieri et al. showed an inverse cor-
relation between miR-221 upregulation and levels of the
proapoptotic protein, Bmf, in hepatocellular carcinoma
samples [76]. Fornari et al. showed increased CDKN1C/p57
and CDKN1B/p27 protein levels by western blot analy-
sis in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines transfected with
anti-miR-221 compared to controls. Conversely, cell lines
treated with miR-221 showed decreased CDKN1C/p57 and
CDKN1B/p27 protein levels [77]. Finally, Mneg et al.
reported that inhibition of miR-21 in hepatocellular carci-
noma cell lines increased expression of PTEN and decreased
tumor cell proliferation, suggesting that increased miR-21
levels promote carcinogenesis [78]. Other identified, but
less-well-studied, modulators of apoptosis in hepatocellular
carcinoma include miR-29, miR-15b, miR-152, miR-101, and
the miR-106b-25 cluster [75,7982].
Ji et al. evaluated a cohort of 214 patients with hepatocel-
lular carcinoma and found that tumors with reduced miR-
26 expression had a favorable response to adjuvant therapy
with interferon alpha, whereas those with high miR-26 did
not respond to therapy, suggesting that miR-26 may be used
to select patients who may benefit from interferon alpha
treatment [83]. Connelly et al. reported that miR-21 and
the miR-17-92 polycistron are consistently upregulated in
human and animal hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines and
that their inhibition by antisense oligonucleotides causes
reduced tumor cell proliferation [84].
Recent studies have established a role for miRNAs in
regulation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and oer
promise for new treatment modalitites. The most frequently
implicated miRNA in HCV modulation is the liver-specific
species, miR-122. Jopling et al. first described a physical
interaction between miR-122 and the HCV genome by
showing that miR-122 binds to the 5UTR of viral RNA
and stimulates viral replication [85]. Henke et al. showed
that miR-122 drives HCV translation by enhancing the
association between a small ribosomal subunit and HCV
RNA [86]. Both mechanisms of HCV potentiation were later
validated by Jangra et al. who demonstrated that viruses with
mutations in miR-122 binding sites failed to replicate [87].
Young et al. reported decreased viral replication in liver cells
Pathology Research International 7
treated with inhibitors of miR-122 and suggested that these
small molecules may represent a new target for HCV therapy,
which has already been successfully tested in HCV-infected
chimpanzees [72,88].
The potential impact of miRNA analysis on patient
selection for specific therapies was underscored by Sarasin-
Filipowicz et al. These authors assessed miR-122 levels by
qRT-PCR in pre- and posttreatment liver biopsies from 42
patients with HCV. They found that patients with decreased
miR-122 levels in pretreatment liver biopsies showed a poor
response to interferon therapy [89]. Other miRNA species
such as miR-24, miR-149, miR-638, and miR-1181 have
also been implicated in HCV-related liver disease and may
facilitate viral entry, replication, and propagation [90].
MicroRNA dysregulation also occurs in association with
hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and may provide clues to
the pathogenesis of HBV-related disease in infected patients.
Yang et al. found that miR-602 expression increased with
progression of HBV-related hepatitis to cirrhosis and hepato-
cellular carcinoma and noted that the tumor suppressor gene
RASSF1A was inhibited in cell lines that highly expressed
miR-602 [91]. Ura et al. studied 12 patients with HBV-
related hepatocellular carcinoma and 14 with HCV-related
hepatocellular carcinoma. They identified 19 dierentially
expressed miRNAs between patients with HBV and HCV
infection. Microarray analysis also identified separate target
genes for HBV- and HCV-related cancers. MicroRNAs
important to HBV-related carcinoma regulate genes involved
in cell death, DNA damage, recombination, and signal trans-
duction whereas those important to HCV-related carcinoma
were related to immune response, antigen presentation, cell
cycle, and proteasome and lipid metabolism [92]. These
findings provide insight into the dierences between HBV-
and HCV-infection and disease progression and may help
identify potential therapeutic target molecules in the future.
6. MicroRNAs and
In Vitro
Cancer Models
Several strategies utilizing miRNAs as in vivo therapeutic
targets are currently under development. Use of antisense
oligonucleotides has been most extensively studied in vitro,
and was recently shown to be an eective suppressor of
miRNA expression in vivo. Krutzfeldt et al. engineered
synthetic RNA analogues, termed “antagomiRs,” to miR-
16, miR-122, miR-192, and miR-194. These compounds
were administered to mice intravenously and corresponding
miRNA levels were measured by northern blot assay 24
hours after injection. These authors reported a marked
reduction in target miRNA levels in various tissues including
liver, lung, kidney, heart, intestine, fat, skin, bone marrow,
muscle, ovaries, and adrenal glands [93]. Locked nucleic acid
(LNA) constructs represent another promising approach to
suppressing miRNA expression. These molecules are nucleic
acid analogues that are “locked” by a methylene bridge
connecting the 2’O and 4’C atoms. This structural modifi-
cation enables LNA oligonucleotides to bind complementary
nucleotide sequences with high anity and excellent mis-
match discrimination. Elmen et al. administered an LNA-
antimiRtoAfricangreenmonkeysinordertostudyits
eect on plasma cholesterol levels and miR-122 levels in
liver tissue by northern blot analysis. They observed a dose-
dependent decrease in total plasma cholesterol and depletion
of mature miR-122 in liver biopsies from these monkeys [94].
Finally, some investigators have employed adenovirus vectors
to increase expression of tumor-suppressor miRNAs. Kota
et al. showed that the adenovirus vector-mediated introduc-
tion of miR-26, a species downregulated in hepatocellular
carcinoma, into mice with liver cancer caused cancer cell
apotosis and tumor regression. This therapy had no adverse
eect on benign hepatocytes, underscoring the potential
applications of this approach [95]. Future in vivo progress
in this field will depend upon increased understanding of
miRNA function in mammals, improved chemical design of
antimiRs and synthetic miRNAs, and development of more
ecient methods for delivery of these molecules to target
tissues.
7. Conclusion
MicroRNAs represent an important class of molecules with
profound diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Emerging
evidence suggests that they may be useful diagnostic adjuncts
that aid identification of tumors of unknown origin or
even ascertain the presence of malignancy in scant biopsy
specimens or sera of patients with suspected cancer. Specific
miRNA expression profiles clearly correlate with prognosis,
so it is highly likely that miRNA analysis will play an
important role in determining the management of patients
in the future. Preliminary studies utilizing antisense oligonu-
cleotides against cancer-specific miRNAs have shown that
some tumors respond to therapy while minimally damaging
healthy tissues. These findings suggest that targeted therapies
against selected miRNAs represent a new treatment modality
for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Advances
in this field have improved our understanding of the
heterogeneity of human malignancies and will contribute
to the growing trend toward individualized management
strategies for cancer patients.
References
[1] W. Tam, “The emergent role of microRNAs in molecular
diagnostics of cancer,Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 10,
no. 5, pp. 415–423, 2008.
[2]W.Zhang,J.E.Dahlberg,andW.Tam,“MicroRNAsin
tumorigenesis: a primer,American Journal of Pathology, vol.
171, no. 3, pp. 728–738, 2007.
[3] A. E. Szafranska, T. S. Davison, J. Shingara et al., “Accu-
rate molecular characterization of formalin-fixed, paran-
embedded tissues by microRNA expression profiling,Journal
of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 415–423, 2008.
[4] S.S.Jerey, “Cancer biomarker profiling with microRNAs,
Nature Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 400–401, 2008.
[5] J. Lu, G. Getz, E. A. Miska et al., “MicroRNA expression
profiles classify human cancers,Nature, vol. 435, no. 7043, pp.
834–838, 2005.
[6] N. Rosenfeld, R. Aharonov, E. Meiri et al., “MicroRNAs
accurately identify cancer tissue origin, Nature Biotechnology,
vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 462–469, 2008.
8Pathology Research International
[7]G.Bloom,I.V.Yang,D.Boulwareetal.,“Multi-platform,
multi-site, microarray-based human tumor classification,
American Journal of Pathology, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2004.
[8] P. Sood, A. Krek, M. Zavolan, G. Macino, and N. Rajewsky,
“Cell-type-specific signatures of microRNAs on target mRNA
expression,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of
the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 2746–2751,
2006.
[9] S. Volinia, G. A. Calin, C. G. Liu et al., “A microRNA
expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer
gene targets,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 2257–2261,
2006.
[10] R. C. Lee, R. L. Feinbaum, and V. Ambros, “The C. elegans
heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense
complementarity to lin-14,Cell, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 843–854,
1993.
[11]A.Esquela-Kerscher,S.M.Johnson,L.Baietal.,“Post-
embryonic expression of C. elegans microRNAs belonging to
the lin-4 let-7 families in the hypodermis and the reproductive
system,Developmental Dynamics, vol. 234, no. 4, pp. 868–
877, 2005.
[12] S. Singh, S. C. Bevan, K. Patil, D. C. Newton, and P.
A. Marsden, “Extensive variation in the 5-UTR of Dicer
mRNAs influences translational eciency,Biochemical and
Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 335, no. 3, pp. 643–
650, 2005.
[13] W. M. Grady, R. K. Parkin, P. S. Mitchell et al., “Epigenetic
silencing of the intronic microRNA hsa-miR-342 and its host
gene EVL in colorectal cancer,Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 27, pp.
3880–3888, 2008.
[14] G. Lanza, M. Ferracin, R. Gaf`
a et al., “mRNA/microRNA gene
expression profile in microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer,”
Molecular Cancer, vol. 6, article 54, 2007.
[15] A. Gaur, D. A. Jewell, Y. Liang et al., “Characterization of
microRNA expression levels and their biological correlates in
human cancer cell lines,Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 6, pp.
2456–2468, 2007.
[16] E. Bandres, E. Cubedo, X. Agirre et al., “Identification by Real-
time PCR of 13 mature microRNAs dierentially expressed in
colorectal cancer and non-tumoral tissues,Molecular Cancer,
vol. 5, article 29, 2006.
[17] Y. X. Wang, X. Y. Zhang, B. F. Zhang, C. Q. Yang, X. M. Chen,
andH.J.Gao,“InitialstudyofmicroRNAexpressionproles
of colonic cancer without lymph node metastasis,Journal of
Digestive Diseases, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 50–54, 2010.
[18] T. Schepeler, J. T. Reinert, M. S. Ostenfeld et al., “Diagnostic
and prognostic microRNAs in stage II colon cancer,” Cancer
Research, vol. 68, no. 15, pp. 6416–6424, 2008.
[19] O. Slaby, M. Svoboda, P. Fabian et al., “Altered expression
of miR-21, miR-31, miR-143 and miR-145 is related to
clinicopathologic features of colorectal cancer,” Oncology, vol.
72, no. 5-6, pp. 397–402, 2008.
[20] Y. Xi, A. Formentini, M. Chien et al., “Prognostic values of
microRNAs in colorectal cancer,” Biomarker Insights, vol. 1, pp.
113–121, 2006.
[21] A. J. Schetter, H. N. Giang, E. D. Bowman et al., “Association
of inflammation-related and microRNA gene expression with
cancer-specific mortality of colon adenocarcinoma,Clinical
Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 18, pp. 5878–5887, 2009.
[22] A. L. Sarver, A. J. French, P. M. Borralho et al., “Human
colon cancer profiles show dierential microRNA expression
depending on mismatch repair status and are characteristic
of undierentiated proliferative states,BMC Cancer, vol. 9,
article 401, 2009.
[23] M. Z. Michael, S. M. O’Connor, N. G. Van Holst Pellekaan,
G. P. Young, and R. J. James, “Reduced accumulation of
specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia,Molecular Cancer
Research, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 882–891, 2003.
[24] C. Guo, J. F. Sah, L. Beard, J. K. V. Willson, S. D. Markowitz,
and K. Guda, “The noncoding RNA, miR-126, suppresses the
growth of neoplastic cells by targeting phosphatidylinositol 3-
kinase signaling and is frequently lost in colon cancers,Genes
Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 939–946, 2008.
[25] J. M. Cummins, Y. He, R. J. Leary et al., “The colorectal
microRNAome,Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 10, pp.
3687–3692, 2006.
[26] C. J. Wang, Z. G. Zhou, L. Wang et al., “Clinicopathological
significance of microRNA-31, -143 and -145 expression in
colorectal cancer,Disease Markers, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 27–34,
2009.
[27] J.A.Chan,A.M.Krichevsky,andK.S.Kosik,“MicroRNA-21
is an antiapoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells,Cancer
Research, vol. 65, no. 14, pp. 6029–6033, 2005.
[28] M. V. Iorio, M. Ferracin, C. G. Liu et al., “MicroRNA gene
expression deregulation in human breast cancer,” Cancer
Research, vol. 65, no. 16, pp. 7065–7070, 2005.
[29] C. Roldo, E. Missiaglia, J. P. Hagan et al., “MicroRNA
expression abnormalities in pancreatic endocrine and acinar
tumors are associated with distinctive pathologic features and
clinical behavior,Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 29,
pp. 4677–4684, 2006.
[30] M. Bloomston, W. L. Frankel, F. Petrocca et al., “MicroRNA
expression patterns to dierentiate pancreatic adenocarci-
noma from normal pancreas and chronic pancreatitis,Journal
of the American Medical Association, vol. 297, no. 17, pp. 1901–
1908, 2007.
[31] E. J. Lee, Y. Gusev, J. Jiang et al., “Expression profiling iden-
tifies microRNA signature in pancreatic cancer,” International
Journal of Cancer, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 1046–1054, 2007.
[32] W. A. Mardin and S. T. Mees, “MicroRNAs: novel diagnostic
and therapeutic tools for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?”
Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 3183–3189,
2009.
[33] Y. Akao, Y. Nakagawa, and T. Naoe, “let-7 microRNA func-
tions as a potential growth suppressor in human colon cancer
cells,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin,vol.29,no.5,pp.
903–906, 2006.
[34] R.Diaz,J.Silva,J.M.Garc
´
ıa et al., “Deregulated expression of
miR-106a predicts survival in human colon cancer patients,
Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 794–802,
2008.
[35] Z. M. Huang, J. Yang, X. Y. Shen et al., “MicroRNA expression
profile in non-cancerous colonic tissue associated with lymph
node metastasis of colon cancer,Journal of Digestive Diseases,
vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 188–194, 2009.
[36] R. K. Yantiss, M. Goodarzi, X. K. Zhou et al., “Clinical,
pathologic, and molecular features of early-onset colorectal
carcinoma,The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol.
33, no. 4, pp. 572–582, 2009.
[37] X. Chen, X. Guo, H. Zhang et al., “Role of miR-143 targeting
KRAS in colorectal tumorigenesis,Oncogene, vol. 28, no. 10,
pp. 1385–1392, 2009.
Pathology Research International 9
[38] S. M. Powell, “Direct analysis for familial adenomatous
polyposis mutations,Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology.
Part B, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 197–207, 2002.
[39] M. Hermsen, C. Postma, J. Baak et al., “Colorectal adenoma to
carcinoma progression follows multiple pathways of chromo-
somal instability,Gastroenterology, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 1109–
1119, 2002.
[40] E. R. Fearon, “Genetic alterations underlying colorectal
tumorigenesis,Cancer Surveys, vol. 12, pp. 119–136, 1992.
[41] K. W. Kinzler, M. C. Nilbert, L. K. Su et al., “Identification of
FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21,Science, vol. 253,
no. 5020, pp. 661–665, 1991.
[42] R. Nagel, C. Le Sage, B. Diosdado et al., “Regulation of the
adenomatous polyposis coli gene by the miR-135 family in
colorectal cancer,Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 14, pp. 5795–
5802, 2008.
[43] T. C. Chang, E. A. Wentzel, O. A. Kent et al., “Transactivation
of miR-34a by p53 broadly influences gene expression and
promotes apoptosis,Molecular Cell, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 745–
752, 2007.
[44] S. Popat, R. Hubner, and R. S. Houlston, “Systematic review
of microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis,
Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 609–618, 2005.
[45] C. M. Ribic, D. J. Sargent, M. J. Moore et al., “Tumor
microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from
fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer,
New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 349, no. 3, pp. 247–257,
2003.
[46] C. Heidelberger, “Fluorinated pyrimidines,Progress in Nucleic
Acid Research and Molecular Biology, vol. 4, pp. 1–50, 1965.
[47] P.M.Borralho,B.T.Kren,R.E.Castro,I.B.MoreiraDaSilva,
C.J.Steer,andC.M.P.Rodrigues,“MicroRNA-143reduces
viability and increases sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil in HCT116
human colorectal cancer cells,FEBS Journal, vol. 276, no. 22,
pp. 6689–6700, 2009.
[48] G. Nakajima, K. Hayashi, Y. Xi et al., “Non-coding microRNAs
hsa-let-7g and hsa-miR-181b are associated with chemore-
sponse to S-1 in colon cancer,Cancer Genomics and Pro-
teomics, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 317–324, 2006.
[49] V. Boni, R. Zarate, J. C. Villa et al., “Role of primary
miRNA polymorphic variants in metastatic colon cancer
patients treated with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan,Pharma-
cogenomics Journal. In press.
[50] A. E. Szafranska, T. S. Davison, J. John et al., “MicroRNA
expression alterations are linked to tumorigenesis and non-
neoplastic processes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,
Oncogene, vol. 26, no. 30, pp. 4442–4452, 2007.
[51] A. E. Szafranska, M. Doleshal, H. S. Edmunds et al., “Analysis
of microRNAs in pancreatic fine-needle aspirates can classify
benign and malignant tissues,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 54, no.
10, pp. 1716–1724, 2008.
[52] M. C. Du Rieu, J. Torrisani, J. Selves et al., “MicroRNA-21 is
induced early in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma precursor
lesions,Clinical Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 603–612, 2010.
[53] M. Dillho,J.Liu,W.Frankel,C.Croce,andM.Bloomston,
“MicroRNA-21 is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and a
potential predictor of survival,Journal of Gastrointestinal
Surgery, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2171–2176, 2008.
[54] N. Ikenaga, K. Ohuchida, K. Mizumoto et al., “MicroRNA-
203 expression as a new prognostic marker of pancreatic
adenocarcinoma,Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 12,
pp. 3120–3128, 2010.
[55] J. Wang, J. Chen, P. Chang et al., “MicroRNAs in plasma of
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients as novel blood-
based biomarkers of disease,Cancer Prevention Research, vol.
2, no. 9, pp. 807–813, 2009.
[56] X. Kong, Y. Du, G. Wang et al., “Detection of dierentially
expressed microRNAs in serum of pancreaticductal adenocar-
cinoma patients: miR-196a could be a potential marker for
poor prognosis,Digestive Diseases and Sciences. In press.
[57] J.K.Park,E.J.Lee,C.Esau,andT.D.Schmittgen,“Antisense
inhibition of microRNA-21 or -221 arrests cell cycle, induces
apoptosis, and sensitizes the eects of gemcitabine in pancre-
atic adenocarcinoma,Pancre as, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. e190–e199,
2009.
[58] Y. Murakami, T. Yasuda, K. Saigo et al., “Comprehensive
analysis of microRNA expression patterns in hepatocellular
carcinoma and non-tumorous tissues,Oncogene, vol. 25, no.
17, pp. 2537–2545, 2006.
[59] W. Li, L. Xie, X. He et al., “Diagnostic and prognostic impli-
cations of microRNAs in human hepatocellular carcinoma,
International Journal of Cancer, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 1616–1622,
2008.
[60] H. Varnholt, U. Drebber, F. Schulze et al., “MicroRNA gene
expression profile of hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocel-
lular carcinoma,Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1223–1232,
2008.
[61] P. Pineau, S. Volinia, K. McJunkin et al., “miR-221 overex-
pression contributes to liver tumorigenesis,Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 264–269, 2010.
[62] Q. W. L. Wong, A. K. K. Ching, A. W. H. Chan et al.,
“MiR-222 overexpression confers cell migratory advantages in
hepatocellular carcinoma through enhancing AKT signaling,
Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 867–875, 2010.
[63] Y. Yamamoto, N. Kosaka, M. Tanaka et al., “MicroRNA-500 as
a potential diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma,
Biomarkers, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 529–538, 2009.
[64] M. Lagos-Quintana, R. Rauhut, A. Yalcin, J. Meyer, W.
Lendeckel, and T. Tuschl, “Identification of tissue-specific
microRNAs from mouse,Current Biology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp.
735–739, 2002.
[65] J. Chang, J. T. Guo, D. Jiang, H. Guo, J. M. Taylor, and T.
M. Block, “Liver-specific microRNA miR-122 enhances the
replication of hepatitis C virus in nonhepatic cells,Journal of
Virology, vol. 82, no. 16, pp. 8215–8223, 2008.
[66] X. Tang, J. Gal, X. Zhuang, W. Wang, H. Zhu, and G. Tang,
A simple array platform for microRNA analysis and its
application in mouse tissues,RNA, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1803–
1822, 2007.
[67] Y. Ladeiro, G. Couchy, C. Balabaud et al., “MicroRNA profiling
in hepatocellular tumors is associated with clinical features
and oncogene/tumor suppressor gene mutations,Hepatology,
vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1955–1963, 2008.
[68] H. Kutay, S. Bai, J. Datta et al., “Downregulation of miR-122
in the rodent and human hepatocellular carcinomas,Journal
of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 671–678, 2006.
[69] L. Gramantieri, F. Fornari, E. Callegari et al., “MicroRNA
involvement in hepatocellular carcinoma: microRNA review
series,Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 12, no.
6, pp. 2189–2204, 2008.
[70] A. Budhu, H. L. Jia, M. Forgues et al., “Identification of
metastasis-related microRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma,
Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 897–907, 2008.
10 Pathology Research International
[71] M. Girard, E. Jacquemin, A. Munnich, S. Lyonnet, and
A. Henrion-Caude, “miR-122, a paradigm for the role of
microRNAs in the liver,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 48, no. 4,
pp. 648–656, 2008.
[72] D.D.Young,C.M.Connelly,C.Grohmann,andA.Deiters,
“Small molecule modifiers of microRNA miR-122 function for
the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection and hepatocellular
carcinoma,Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 132,
no. 23, pp. 7976–7981, 2010.
[73] C. Coulouarn, V. M. Factor, J. B. Andersen, M. E. Durkin, and
S. S. Thorgeirsson, “Loss of miR-122 expression in liver cancer
correlates with suppression of the hepatic phenotype and gain
of metastatic properties, Oncogene, vol. 28, no. 40, pp. 3526–
3536, 2009.
[74] W. C. Tsai, P. W. C. Hsu, T. C. Lai et al., “MicroRNA-122,
a tumor suppressor MicroRNA that regulates intrahepatic
metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma,Hepatology, vol. 49,
no. 5, pp. 1571–1582, 2009.
[75] Y. Li, W. Tan, T. W. L. Neo et al., “Role of the miR-106b-
25 microRNA cluster in hepatocellular carcinoma,Cancer
Science, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 1234–1242, 2009.
[76] L. Gramantieri, F. Fornari, M. Ferracin et al., “MicroRNA-221
targets Bmf in hepatocellular carcinoma and correlates with
tumor multifocality,Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 16,
pp. 5073–5081, 2009.
[77] F. Fornari, L. Gramantieri, M. Ferracin et al., “MiR-221 con-
trols CDKN1C/p57 and CDKN1B/p27 expression in human
hepatocellular carcinoma,Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 43, pp.
5651–5661, 2008.
[78] F. Meng, R. Henson, H. Wehbe-Janek, K. Ghoshal, S. T.
Jacob, and T. Patel, “MicroRNA-21 regulates expression of
the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in human hepatocellular
cancer,Gastroenterology, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 647–658, 2007.
[79] Y. Xiong, J. H. Fang, J. P. Yun et al., “Eects of microrna-29
on apoptosis, tumorigenicity, and prognosis of hepatocellular
carcinoma,Hepatology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 836–845, 2010.
[80] G. E. Chung, J. H. Yoon, S. J. Myung et al., “High expression
of microRNA-15b predicts a low risk of tumor recurrence
following curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma,
Oncology Reports, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 113–119, 2010.
[81] H. Su, J. R. Yang, T. Xu et al., “MicroRNA-101, down-
regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma, promotes apoptosis
and suppresses tumorigenicity,Cancer Research, vol. 69, no.
3, pp. 1135–1142, 2009.
[82] J. Huang, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, and S. Sun, “Down-regulated
microRNA-152 induces aberrant DNA methylation in hepati-
tis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting DNA
methyltransferase 1,Hepatology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 60–70,
2010.
[83] J. Ji, J. Shi, A. Budhu et al., “MicroRNA expression, survival,
and response to interferon in liver cancer,” New England
Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 15, pp. 1437–1447, 2009.
[84] E. Connolly, M. Melegari, P. Landgraf et al., “Elevated
expression of the miR-17-92 polycistron and miR-21
in hepadnavirus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma
contributes to the malignant phenotype,” American Journal of
Pathology, vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 856–864, 2008.
[85] C. L. Jopling, “Regulation of hepatitis C virus by microRNA-
122,Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1220–
1223, 2008.
[86] J. I. Henke, D. Goergen, J. Zheng et al., “MicroRNA-122
stimulates translation of hepatitis C virus RNA,EMBO
Journal, vol. 27, no. 24, pp. 3300–3310, 2008.
[87] R.K.Jangra,M.Yi,andS.M.Lemon,“Regulationofhepatitis
C virus translation and infectious virus production by the
microRNA miR-122,Journal of Virology, vol. 84, no. 13, pp.
6615–6625, 2010.
[88] R. E. Lanford, E. S. Hildebrandt-Eriksen, A. Petri et al.,
“Therapeutic silencing of microRNA-122 in primates with
chronic hepatitis C virus infection,Science, vol. 327, no. 5962,
pp. 198–201, 2010.
[89] M. Sarasin-Filipowicz, J. Krol, I. Markiewicz, M. H. Heim,
and W. Filipowicz, “Decreased levels of microRNA miR-122
in individuals with hepatitis C responding poorly to interferon
therapy,Journal of Hepatology, vol. 51, pp. 606–609, 2009.
[90] X. Liu, T. Wang, T. Wakita, and W. Yang, “Systematic
identification of microRNA and messenger RNA profiles in
hepatitis C virus-infected human hepatoma cells,Virology,
vol. 398, no. 1, pp. 57–67, 2010.
[91] L. Yang, Z. Ma, D. Wang, W. Zhao, L. Chen, and G.
Wang, “MicroRNA-602 regulating tumor suppressive gene
RASSF1A is overexpressed in hepatitis B virus-infected liver
and hepatocellular carcinoma,Cancer Biology and Therapy,
vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 803–808, 2010.
[92] S. Ura, M. Honda, T. Yamashita et al., “Dierential microRNA
expression between hepatitis B and hepatitis C leading disease
progression to hepatocellular carcinoma,Hepatology, vol. 49,
no. 4, pp. 1098–1112, 2009.
[93] J.Kota,R.R.Chivukula,K.A.ODonnelletal.,“Therapeutic
delivery of miR-26a inhibits cancer cell proliferation and
induces tumor-specific apoptosis,Cell, vol. 137, pp. 1005–
1017, 2009.
[94] J. Krutzfeldt, N. Rajewsky, R. Braich et al., “Silencing of
microRNAs in vivo with ’antagomirs’,Nature, vol. 438, no.
7068, pp. 685–689, 2005.
[95] J. Elmen, M. Lindow, S. Sch¨
utz et al., “LNA-mediated
microRNA silencing in non-human primates,Nature, vol.
452, no. 7189, pp. 896–899, 2008.
... Colon cancer, the third most prevalent cancer worldwide [17], was used as a study model. Although many papers have been published on miRNA profiling in colon cancer using different microarray platforms [18][19][20][21], none has compared 5p/3p contributions. In this work, a nanolitre-scale realtime reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) platform was used for differential miRNA profiling in colon cancer cells relative to normal colon tissues. ...
... were significantly up-regulated and 36 (28.1%) were downregulated, suggesting significant miRNA dysregulation in colon carcinogenesis, which is consistent with previous reports [18][19][20][21]. ...
... In this global analysis, we have identified 19 dysregulated 5p/3p pairs that are significantly co-expressed in colon cancer cells. Many of these miRNAs have previously been reported but without clear identification of which of the 5p/3p species is involved [18][19][20][21][39][40][41][42]. We further show that out of the 19 co-existing pairs, 17 pairs were either co-up-or codown-regulated (Table 1), indicative of concerted selection of the 5'-and 3'-arm of the pre-miRNA precursors. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Two mature miRNA species may be generated from the 5' and 3' arms of a pre-miRNA precursor. In most cases, only one species remains while the complementary species is degraded. However, co-existence of miRNA-5p and -3p species is increasingly being reported. In this work, we aimed to systematically investigate co-expression of miRNA-5p/3p in colon cancer cells in a genome-wide analysis, and to examine cross-targeting of the dysregulated miRNAs and 5p/3p species. Results: Four colon cancer cell lines were examined relative to two normal colon tissues. Of the 1,190 miRNAs analyzed, 92 and 36 were found to be up- or down-regulated, respectively, in cancer cells. Nineteen co-expressed miRNA-5p/3p pairs were further identified suggesting frequent 5p/3p co-accumulation in colon cancer cells. Of these, 14 pairs were co-up-regulated and 3 pairs were co-down-regulated indicating concerted 5p/3p dysregulation. Nine dysregulated miRNA pairs fell into three miRNA gene families, namely let-7, mir-8/200 and mir-17, which showed frequent cross-targeting in the metastasis process. Focusing on the let-7d-5p/3p pair, the respectively targeted IGF1R and KRAS were shown to be in a reverse relationship with expression of the respective miRNA, which was confirmed in transient transfection assays using let-7d mimic or inhibitor. Targeting of KRAS by let-7d was previous reported; targeting of IGF1R by let-7d-5p was confirmed in luciferase assays in this study. The findings of let-7d-5p/3p and multiple other miRNAs targeting IGF1R, KRAS and other metastasis-related factors suggest that 5p/3p miRNAs contribute to cross-targeting of multiple cancer-associated factors and processes possibly to evade functional abolishment when any one of the crucial factors are inactivated. Conclusions: miRNA-5p/3p species are frequently co-expressed and are coordinately regulated in colon cancer cells. In cancer cells, multiple cross-targeting by the miRNAs, including the co-existing 5p/3p species, frequently occurs in an apparent safe-proof scheme of miRNA regulation of important tumorigenesis processes. Further systematic analysis of co-existing miRNA-5p/3p pairs in clinical tissues is important in elucidating 5p/3p contributions to cancer pathogenesis.
... MicroRNA (miRNA) refers to a group of small non-coding RNAs that are ~22 (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) nucleotides in length and which regulate RNA expression at the translational level (7)(8)(9). miRNAs have been associated with a variety of diseases, including different forms of cancer. ...
... For example, miR-9 is activated by YC/MYCN, which induces cancer metastasis by regulating the expression of metastasis suppressor protein, E-cadherin (17), and miR-449a can cause retinoblastoma (Rb)-dependent cell cycle arrest and cellular senescence of prostate cancer (18). miRNAs constitute a new class of molecules that through interaction with oncogenes and/or tumor suppressor genes, can promote the formation of cancer (19). However, different miRNAs regulate different signaling pathways and different target proteins/genes that affect the biological changes characteristic of cancer. ...
Article
Full-text available
The present study was carried out to demonstrate the epidemiological value of microRNA (miRNA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) by investigating the association between miRNA gene polymorphisms and the susceptibility to CRC. Multiple meta-analyses of reported data were conducted, and odds ratio values and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess these associations. Stata 11.0 software was used to analyze the data and the modified Jadad quality score was employed to evaluate the quality of the retrieved studies. We retrieved 38 studies on the association between miRNA polymorphisms and risk of CRC, however only 15 met the requirements of the inclusion criteria. In conclusion, we identified a variety of miRNAs (miRNA-let-7, miR-34b/c, miR-146a, miR-603 and miR-149) gene polymorphisms that are associated with susceptibility to CRC. However, some miRNAs (miR-192a, miR-608 and miR-27a) are associated with CRC, but not susceptibility to CRC. The results have limitations given the relatively low number of studies available. Therefore, it is necessary to collect data from large sample-size studies to further validate the results.
... 26,35,36 In recent studies, the expressions of 27 miRNAs were changed following ERβ expression in CRC and most of these miRNAs are implicated in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal cancers. [47][48][49] Also, many of the mRNA targets of these miRs were concomitantly changed upon ERβ expression. For example, Hur et al. found that miR-200 was strongly downregulated upon ERβ expression, which resulted in increased ZEB1 and decreased E-cadherin expressions. ...
Article
Full-text available
Estrogens have been implicated in the pathogenesis of various cancer types, including colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Estrogen receptors such as ERα and ERβ activate intracellular signaling cascades followed by binding to estrogen, resulting in important changes in cellular behaviors. The nuclear estrogen receptors, i.e. ERβ and ERα are responsible for the genomic actions of estrogens, whereas the other receptor, such as G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) regulates rapid non‐genomic actions, which lead to secondary gene expression changes in cells. ERβ, the predominant estrogen receptor expressed in both normal and non‐malignant colonic epithelium, has protective roles in colon carcinogenesis. ERβ may exert the anti‐tumor effect through selective activation of pro‐apoptotic signaling, increasing DNA repair, inhibiting expression of oncogenes, regulating cell cycle progression, and also by changing the micro‐RNA pool and DNA‐methylation. Thus, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of estrogen and its receptors in CRC pathogenesis could provide a new horizon for effective therapeutic development. Furthermore, using synthetic or natural compounds as ER agonists may induce estrogen‐mediated anti‐cancer activities against colon cancer. In this study, we report the most recent pre‐clinical and experimental evidences related to ERs in CRC development. Also, we reviewed the actions of naturally occurring and synthetic compounds, which have a protective role against CRC development by acting as ER agonist. ERß, the predominant estrogen receptor expressed in both normal and non‐malignant colonic epithelium, has a protective role in colon carcinogenesis. ERß may exert the anti‐tumor effect through selective activation of pro‐apoptotic signaling, increasing DNA repair, inhibiting expression of oncogenes, regulating cell cycle progression, and also by changing the micro‐RNA pool and DNA‐methylation.
... MiRNAs have been investigated as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for various diseases. Some miRNAs have been associated with GISTs, and GIST location, mutation status, tumor risk, and chromosomal changes (Kang et al. 2005;Yao et al. 2009;Chun-Zhi et al. 2010;Haller et al. 2010;Xie et al. 2010;Kim et al. 2011;Panarelli et al. 2011;Valladares-Ayerbes et al. 2011;Song et al. 2011). Recent studies have indicated that miRNAs are associated with imatinib resistance in GISTs (Akcakava et al. 2014;Gao et al. 2014;Shi et al. 2016); however, since the miRNAs were identified from tissue specimens of GIST patients, they were not suitable as prognostic markers of imatinib resistance. ...
Article
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumor of the intestinal tract. Imatinib is used as first-line therapy for GIST patients; however, secondary imatinib resistance poses a significant clinical challenge. Here, we analyzed serum miRNA expression profiles to identify specific serum miRNAs that could be used as early diagnostic markers. Candidate miRNAs were validated using Taqman quantitative PCR with serum samples from secondary imatinib-resistant GIST patients (n = 39), imatinib-sensitive GIST patients (n = 37), and healthy controls (n = 28). Serum miR-518e-5p and miR-548e levels were higher in secondary imatinib-resistant GIST than imatinib-sensitive GIST patients or healthy controls (P < 0.0001). However, ROC analysis indicated that only miR-518e-5p could distinguish imatinib-resistant GIST. To discriminate imatinib-resistant from imatinib-sensitive GIST patients, the AUC for serum miR-518e-5p was 0.9938, with 99.8% sensitivity and 82.1% specificity. Serum miR-518e-5p could also discriminate imatinib-resistant GIST patients from healthy controls with 99.9% sensitivity and 97.4% specificity. These data indicate that serum miR-518e-5p is a potentially promising non-invasive biomarker for early detection and diagnosis of secondary imatinib-resistant GIST.
... MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs (18-25 nucleotides) that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. 10,11 miRNAs bind to messenger RNA (mRNA) and prevent gene expression by inhibiting translation or inducing mRNA cleavage. MiRNA expression profiling has shown great promise in multiple cancers including pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), where changes in miRNA expression levels correlate with diagnosis and prognosis. ...
Article
Full-text available
Current diagnostic tools for pancreatic cysts fail to reliably differentiate mucinous from nonmucinous cysts. Reliable biomarkers are needed. MicroRNAs (miRNA) may offer insights into pancreatic cysts. Our aims were to (1) identify miRNAs that distinguish benign from both premalignant cysts and malignant pancreatic lesions using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) pathology specimens; (2) identify miRNAs that distinguish mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) from branch duct-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN). A total of 69 FFPE pancreatic specimens were identified: (1) benign (20 serous cystadenoma (SCA)), (2) premalignant (10 MCN, 10 BD-IPMN, 10 main duct IPMN (MD-IPMN)), and (3) malignant (19 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)). Total nucleic acid extraction was performed followed by miRNA expression profiling of 378 miRNAs interrogated using TaqMan MicroRNA Arrays Pool A and verification of candidate miRNAs. Bioinformatics was used to generate classifiers. MiRNA profiling of 69 FFPE specimens yielded 35 differentially expressed miRNA candidates. Four different 4-miRNA panels differentiated among the lesions: one panel separated SCA from MCN, BD-IPMN, MD-IPMN, and PDAC with sensitivity 85% (62, 97), specificity 100% (93, 100), a second panel distinguished MCN from SCA, BD-IPMN, MD-IPMN, and PDAC with sensitivity and specificity 100% (100, 100), a third panel differentiated PDAC from IPMN with sensitivity 95% (76, 100) and specificity 85% (72, 96), and the final panel diagnosed MCN from BD-IPMN with sensitivity and specificity approaching 100%. MiRNA profiling of surgical pathology specimens differentiates serous cystadenoma from both premalignant pancreatic cystic neoplasms and PDAC and MCN from BD-IPMN.
... miRNAs constitute a new class of molecules that are able to promote the formation of cancer through interactions with oncogenes and/or tumor suppressor genes (49). However, different miRNAs have different signaling pathways and the target proteins/genes through which they affect the biological changes of cancer. ...
Article
Full-text available
microRNAs (miRNAs) are a group of small non-coding RNAs that are ~22 (18 to 25) nucleotides (nt) long and have been associated with a variety of diseases, including cancer. Increasing evidence indicates that miRNAs are essential in the development, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of a variety of tumors. The utility of miRNAs as biomarkers for diagnosis and of target molecules for the treatment of cancers is increasingly being recognized. With the discovery of circulating miRNAs, a non-invasive approach for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer has been identified. This review summarizes the role of miRNAs in the development of different tumors, as well as a variety of other biological events. Moreover, this review focuses on analyzing the function and mechanism of gastric cancer-related miRNAs and investigates the importance of circulating miRNAs in gastric cancer, as well as their origin. Finally, this review lists a number of the problems that must be solved prior to miRNAs being used as reliable non-invasive tools for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of gastric cancer.
Article
Full-text available
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is considered as a metabolic disease with hyperglycemia. Accumulating investigations have explored the important role of hereditary factors for T2DM occurrence. Some functional microRNA (miR) polymorphisms may affect their interactions with target mRNAs and result in an aberrant expression. Thus, miR-variants might be considered as a biomarker of the susceptibility of T2DM. In this study, we recruited 502 T2DM cases and 782 healthy subjects. We selected miR-146a rs2910164 C>G, -196a2 rs11614913 T>C and -499 rs3746444 A>G loci and carried out an investigation to identify whether these miR- loci could influence T2DM occurrence. In this investigation, a Bonferroni correction was harnessed. After adjustment, we found that rs2910164 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was a protective factor for T2DM (GG vs. CC/CG: adjusted P=0.010), especially in never drinking (GG vs. CC/CG: adjusted P=0.001) and ≥24 kg/m2 (GG vs. CC/CG: adjusted P=0.002) subgroups. We also identified that rs11614913 SNP was a protective factor for T2DM in smoking subjects (CC/TC vs. TT: adjusted P=0.002). When we analyzed an interaction of SNP-SNP with the susceptibility of T2DM. Rs11614913/rs3746444, Rs2910164/rs3746444, and rs11614913/rs2910164 combinations were not associated with the risk of T2DM. In summary, the present study highlights that rs2910164 SNP decreases a susceptibility of T2DM, especially in BMI ≥24 kg/m2 and never drinking subgroups. In addition, we also identify that rs11614913 C allele decreases the susceptibility of T2DM significantly in smoking subgroup.
Article
Full-text available
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the leading causes of cancer-related death, principally due to its metastatic spread and multifactorial chemoresistance. The therapeutic failure can also be explained by inter- or intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and tumor stromal content. Thus, the identification of novel prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic options are warranted in the management of CRC patients. There are data showing that microRNA-21 is elevated in different types of cancer, particularly colon adenocarcinoma and that this is association with a poor prognosis. This suggests that microRNA-21 may be of value as a potential therapeutic target. Furthermore, locked nucleic acid (LNA)-modified oligonucleotides have recently emerged as a therapeutic option for targeting dysregulated miRNAs in cancer therapy, through antisense-based gene silencing. Further work is required to identify innovative anticancer drugs that improve the current therapy either through novel combinatorial approaches or with better efficacy than conventional drugs. We aimed to provide an overview of the preclinical and clinical studies targeting key dysregulated signaling pathways in CRC as well as the therapeutic application of LNA-modified oligonucleotides and miR inhibitors in the treatment of CRC patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Chapter
This chapter discusses preclinical safety assessment of drug-induced pancreatic toxicity, focusing on exocrine injury bio-markers and endocrine functional biomarkers that are relevant to drug discovery and development. For each of these biomarkers, background, biomarker value, and current gaps are discussed. For exocrine biomarkers, the section is divided into traditional, exploratory, and emerging pancreatic biomarkers. The lack of correlation between preclinical pancreatic toxicity findings and safety findings in humans, when it occurs, may be related to interspecies and/or interstrain differences in susceptibility to the mechanism of pancreatic toxicity along with other factors. Currently, some of the biggest hurdles for risk management of preclinical pancreatic toxicity are the lack of understanding of the relevance of preclinical findings for human health risk, the lack of clinically monitorable biomarkers, the lack of relevant animal models of human pancreatic disease, and the need to develop in vitro models that replicate the in vivo clinical situation.
Article
MicroRNAs are short non-coding RNA molecules that participate in the regulation of gene expression. Several studies have demonstrated the involvement of microRNAs in oncogenesis and a variety of physiological functions. We conducted a literature review of studies that evaluated histological microRNAs in colorectal cancer. Although additional clinical studies are required to substantiate the relationship between microRNAs and colorectal cancer, there is preliminary evidence that microRNAs are related to the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Article
Full-text available
Recent studies suggest that one or more genes on chromosome 5q21 are important for the development of colorectal cancers, particularly those associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). To facilitate the identification of genes from this locus, a portion of the region that is tightly linked to FAP was cloned. Six contiguous stretches of sequence (contigs) containing approximately 5.5 Mb of DNA were isolated. Subclones from these contigs were used to identify and position six genes, all of which were expressed in normal colonic mucosa. Two of these genes (APC and MCC) are likely to contribute to colorectal tumorigenesis. The MCC gene had previously been identified by virtue of its mutation in human colorectal tumors. The APC gene was identified in a contig initiated from the MCC gene and was found to encode an unusually large protein. These two closely spaced genes encode proteins predicted to contain coiled-coil regions. Both genes were also expressed in a wide variety of tissues. Further studies of MCC and APC and their potential interaction should prove useful for understanding colorectal neoplasia.
Article
lin-4 is essential for the normal temporal control of diverse postembryonic developmental events in C. elegans. lin-4 acts by negatively regulating the level of LIN-14 protein, creating a temporal decrease in LIN-14 protein starting in the first larval stage (L1). We have cloned the C. elegans lin-4 locus by chromosomal walking and transformation rescue. We used the C. elegans clone to isolate the gene from three other Caenorhabditis species; all four Caenorhabditis clones functionally rescue the lin-4 null allele of C. elegans. Comparison of the lin-4 genomic sequence from these four species and site-directed mutagenesis of potential open reading frames indicated that lin-4 does not encode a protein. Two small lin-4 transcripts of approximately 22 and 61 nt were identified in C. elegans and found to contain sequences complementary to a repeated sequence element in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of lin-14 mRNA, suggesting that lin-4 regulates lin-14 translation via an antisense RNA-RNA interaction.
Chapter
The chapter discusses the fluorinated pyrimidines. The fluorinated pyrimidines have been used as chemotherapeutic agents and as tools to dissect the biological and biochemical processes. This chapter examines both of these aspects. Thus, in comparing the fluorouracil and the trifluorothymine series, it is found that they both inhibit thymidylate synthetase, but by different mechanisms. Moreover, the former series is incorporated into the RNA and the latter series is incorporated into the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Each series, then, is involved in two different biochemical mechanisms that make the compounds versatile metabolic tools, but without the apparently unique specificity of the actinomycins. The chapter discusses the clinical efficacy of fluorinated pyrimidines in cancer chemotherapy. The chapter also discusses various biological effects, such as: (a) inhibition of thymidylate synthetase, (b) mechanisms of cellular resistance, and (c) effects on bacterial cell walls. It also discusses the other biological effects, such as: (a) teratogenesis and morphogenesis, (b) insect chemisterilization, and (c) effects on chromosomes.
Article
Aims: It is important to understand the role of microRNA in the transformation from chronic HBV hepatitis to hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatocarcinogenesis. Relationship of microRNA-602 with chronic HBV hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and HCC was investigated in this article. Methods: 1. MicroRNA expression was investigated in normal (NL), chronic HBV hepatitis(CH), HBV-positive cirrhotic (CL), HBV-positive HCC and corresponding normal para-tumorous livers (NT) and hepatoma cells was evaluated with microRNA microarray and verified by real-time PCR, and microRNA-602 was selected for further study. Expression of miR602-target genes RASSF1A and P73 were detected with RT-PCR and Western blot. 2. MicroRNA-602 expression in HepG2 and HepG2-HBX was inhibited by miR-602 inhibitor transfection; RASSF1A and P73 expression was detected and cell apoptosis and proliferation were detected. Results: 1. 14 MicroRNAs were aberrantly expressed in HCC and CL compared with NL. Among these, microRNA-602 expression in CH, LC, NT and HCC was 2.939, 3.234, 2.439 and 4.134 times of that in NL respectively, which was significantly different (p