In populist discourse, the existing body of research agrees that populism advocates popular sovereignty and uses metaphors, among other rhetoric devices, to appeal to the people. However, more studies with a discursive focus are needed to gain a better insight into the use of metaphorical prepositions. Although extensive research has been conducted on metaphors of the people in populist
... [Show full abstract] discourse, most of it is limited to metaphors expressed by nouns and verbs. Therefore, this paper has taken a corpus-based approach to focus on the metaphorical extensions of prepositions in President Trump's inaugural speech from a cognitive perspective. The results confirm that metaphorical prepositions are used to (re-)establish the spatio-social parameters of people and to determine their social mobility. The motion schema, in which dynamic objects move between spaces, structures the underlying conceptual metaphors. Specifically, people are conceptualized as trajectors moving between non-spatial landmarks in a two-stage scenario. In the first stage, they move into unpleasant spaces while, in the second, they get out and move to desirable ones. BAD SOCIAL CONDITION IS SPATIAL CONFINEMENT and the related metaphors activate a cognitive framework of two juxtaposed spaces. The first space dramatizes the aggrieved groups while the second promotes the problem-solver. These metaphors do not only appeal to emotions but also to geometrical reasoning and presidential credibility. They aim to represent populism as the voice of the disenchanted. By the magic of such metaphors and appeals, populist mobilization may go too far in incarnating the collective will and distorting democracy.