Content uploaded by María Elena Márquez-Caraveo
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by María Elena Márquez-Caraveo on Aug 15, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
Perspectives of intellectual disability in Mexico: epidemiology,
policy, and services for children and adults
Gregorio Katz
a
, Maria E. Ma
´rquez-Caraveo
b
and Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce
c
Introduction
The extent of actual disabilities in the Mexican population
is unknown. The most recent estimate is based on a 2003
national survey conducted by the National Institute of
Public Health that measures self-perception of health [1].
This survey documented that 9% of the total population
in the country had some degree of difficulty in mobility,
mental functioning, mood, normal activities, pain, and/or
social functioning. This puts the number of people in
Mexico with a disability at roughly 9.7 million, with a
prevalence of intellectual disability of 3% or 3 million
people [2]. In spite of the magnitude of this figure, the
medical unit that provides the most care for childhood
psychiatric disorders in Mexico City (Hospital Psiquia
´trico
Infantil ‘Dr Juan N. Navarro’) reported in 2009 only
444 diagnostic incident cases of mental retardation in
Mexico City, which has approximately 20% of the coun-
try’s total population. This suggests very low coverage and
little demand for specialized medical services by families
with children with intellectual disability.
Any estimate of the epidemiological indicators of intel-
lectual disability in Mexico faces a variety of methodo-
logical problems. First, psychiatric hospitals for the adult
population neither refer to nor quantify intellectual dis-
ability as a primary diagnosis. In addition, population
surveys of psychiatric disorders in adolescents [3
] and in
the population over 18 years of age [4,5] have used the
Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI
certified version 15 World Health Organization, 2001),
which does not include a validated questionnaire for the
diagnosis of intellectual disability; it is, therefore, impos-
sible to know its magnitude. In summary, the prevalence
of intellectual disability in Mexico has not been esta-
blished; the hospitals that provide psychiatric care
underestimate the presence of intellectual disability in
children; and, in the adult population, diagnosis and
follow-up of people with intellectual disability are
virtually nonexistent.
In Mexico, the underreporting and/or misclassification of
intellectual disability by mental health professionals is
evident. The competencies and abilities of these pro-
fessionals are oriented toward identifying the high comor-
bidity of psychopathologies in this multifactorial morbid
condition. In order to classify the true extent of intellec-
tual disability as a public health problem, the CIDI will
need to be modified to include a series of questions that
allow for the identification of people with intellectual
disability.
Social exclusion and lack of public policies
for intellectual disability in Mexico: the
common denominator
Organized, governmental normalization programs for
people with intellectual disability to foster social and
a
Universidad Nacional Auto
´noma de Me
´xico,
b
Hospital
Psiquia
´trico Infantil ‘Dr Juan N. Navarro’, Ciudad de
Me
´xico and
c
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pu´blica,
Cuernavaca, Morelos, Me
´xico
Correspondence to Dr Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce,
Director del Centro de Investigacio
´n en Salud
Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pu´ blica,
Avenida Universidad 655, Colonia Sta. Ma.
Ahuacatitla
´n. Cuernavaca, Morelos 62100, Mexico
Tel: +52 777 3 29 30 03; fax: +52 777 3 11 11 48;
e-mail: elazcano@insp.mx
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 2010, 23:432–435
Purpose of review
Intellectual disability is a public health issue, which has largely been overlooked in
Mexico. The magnitude of this problem is unknown; few programs exist for adults and
mental health professionals focus mainly on identifying treatable comorbidities.
Recent findings
In Mexico, there is an example of a best practice in social integration. This program has
benefited hundreds of adults with intellectual disability by teaching four basic abilities:
practical academic skills; vocational skills; independent living skills; and skills for
community integration.
Summary
In a sociocultural and economic context such as Mexico’s, social integration programs
are feasible and necessary in order to provide an organized social response to the
health, social, and vocational needs of people with intellectual disability and should
become part of public policy.
Keywords
intellectual disability, Mexico, public health
Curr Opin Psychiatry 23:432–435
ß2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
0951-7367
0951-7367 ß2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins DOI:10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833ad9b5
labor inclusion are lacking in the Latin American region,
and because of the absence of public policies – social,
labor, and health policies – intellectual disability could
be considered the most disadvantaged of all the disad-
vantaged in Mexico and other poor countries. And yet,
intellectual disability is a multifactorial, morbid condition
that involves dependency on the family, a higher fre-
quency of comorbidity, enormous catastrophic expenses
that impoverish families, and cultural patterns that result
in stigmatization, discrimination, and segregation. Thus,
in Mexico, people with intellectual disability could be
considered ‘invisible’ citizens as they do not have uni-
versal access to medical services and because there are no
official programs to foster independence.
The reality of social exclusion of people with intellectual
disability is directly proportional to the degree of poverty
[6] and is conceptually related to three components. The
first of these is economic deprivation, which means
insufficient family income, inadequate job training, and
a lack of job opportunities for this population. The second
component is social deprivation, in which the families
themselves segregate people with intellectual disability
from the community where the likelihood of disruption of
social and family ties is greater in this vulnerable popu-
lation. In addition, in Mexico, there are few charitable
organizations or community-based groups that work to
address this situation. Together, these elements lead to
marginalization, the modification of social behavior, and
the lack of participation in community activities. More-
over and very important is that people with intellectual
disability experience a progressive deterioration in health
and, unfortunately, there is no universal healthcare cover-
age. The third component is the absence of political
representation and, consequently, of social empower-
ment, which is directly proportional to the lack of parti-
cipation in decisions that affect their daily life.
In summary, social and labor exclusion of people with
intellectual disability in Mexico and Latin America leads
not only to poverty and greater catastrophic expenses for
the family, but also to insecure life and work conditions.
It also results in greater deterioration in the disability
itself and poor quality of life due to increased comorbid-
ity, including obesity due to a sedentary lifestyle, poor
oral–dental health, decline in mental health, particularly
depression, and, especially in Mexico, early-onset dia-
betes mellitus [7].
Intellectual disability and civil society: a
predominance of philanthropic and charitable
organizations
In Mexico, according to the national directory of people
with intellectual disability, there are 567 organizations
that provide intellectual disability services and care;
however, most of these organizations only serve those
less than 18 years of age (http://www.inegi.gob.mx/est/
contenidos/espanol/metodologias/registros/sociales/dir_
discapacidad2.pdf). The majority of these groups are
nongovernmental organizations created by parents,
whose work has primarily a philanthropic and charitable
context and yet many of these groups act without regard
to scientific evidence. One organization, CONFE
(Mexican Confederation of Organizations for Persons
with Intellectual Disability; http://www.confe.org.mx/),
offers a job training program for adults with intellectual
disability, with the limitation that it does not provide
independent living or social inclusion skills; these inter-
ventions are local and have very limited coverage. Most
programs developed in Mexico are the result of isolated
anecdotal, nonscientific evidence, have had little impact
on the affected population, and have been unsuccessful
in altering public policies. Additionally, once people
reach the age of 18 years, government no longer provides
services over the course of their adult lives, an indication
that intellectual disability has not been considered, even
in meetings organized by civil societies, as was the case in
the recent Second Continental Congress of Community
Based Rehabilitation of the Americas in Oaxaca 2010, in
which the topic of normalization and independence
for people with intellectual disability was absent
(http://superacionoaxaca.wordpress.com/2010/02/13/ter
cera-reunion-ordinaria-del-consejo-estatal-de-personas-
con-discapacidad-en-oaxaca/).
Intellectual disability and public policies in
Mexico: absence of interventions based on
scientific evidence
Education policies for people with intellectual disability
implemented in Mexico have been oriented toward the
creation of schools for special education and the integ-
ration of children and adolescents with intellectual dis-
ability in primary education [8]. Although these strategies
are useful for promoting diversity in the classroom, they
are centered on academics and not useful for promoting
independent living skills; in addition, specialized teacher
training is inefficient in understanding the needs of
the intellectual disability population, particularly when
attempting to use a classroom integration model.
The National Program for the Development of Persons
with Disabilities 2009–2012 (PRONADDIS, abbrevi-
ation in Spanish; http://www.conadis.salud.gob.mx/des
cargas/pdf/PRONADDIS.pdf) states that its purpose is
to contribute to the comprehensive development and full
inclusion of persons with disabilities and their families in
the social, political, and productive life of the country,
with complete respect for their human rights. Never-
theless, the program does not include guidelines for fos-
tering normalization for people with intellectual disability
Perspectives of intellectual disability in Mexico Katz et al. 433
nor does it suggest external evaluations to promote inter-
ventions based on scientific evidence. It operates using a
supportive approach with no specific proposal for the
promotion of independence. Thus, it is greatly influenced
by the charitable and philanthropic overview, without
considering the state’s obligation to provide an organized
social response for the most vulnerable people in society –
the people with intellectual disability.
Another reason for intellectual disability to be a forgotten
health problem in Mexico is that the most influential
Mexican institution on the prevention and care of psy-
chiatric disorders, the National Psychiatric Institute
(INP), in its healthcare or national research priorities
has not included people with intellectual disability
who are 18 years and older.
Search for independence and normalization:
an example of good practice and promotion
of social and work integration in Mexico
Self-determination on living and working in the com-
munity is the primary indicator of quality of life [9], and,
therefore, the greatest expectation of parents of people
with intellectual disability is the inclusion of their chil-
dren into the community [10], within the Mexican con-
text [11]. In this respect, community centers may be an
effective alternative in achieving this goal, as has been
widely documented for people with intellectual disability
living independently in residential placement acquiring
more skills and adaptive behaviors [12]. Katz et al. [12]
referred to programs that assist in the normalization
process for people with intellectual disability in Mexico.
These have been very successful for over 25 years in
benefiting adults with intellectual disability. These pro-
grams have achieved optimal rehabilitation for all those
individuals who present with below average intelligence,
with or without associated neurological symptoms,
enabling them to function to their greatest potential.
The acquired experience in Mexico provides evidence of
the usefulness, feasibility, and relevance of normalization
programs for local and regional sociocultural contexts
[13]. Taking into account the above, the National Insti-
tute of Public Health, in collaboration with the govern-
ment of the State of Mexico, developed an interinstitu-
tional collaboration for 2010 to provide an organized
social response for adults with intellectual disability. This
collaboration has the following objectives:
(1) Creation of state and regional programs for people
with intellectual disability, aimed at fostering inde-
pendence, through the development of social and
working skills.
(2) Identification of job positions, solicited by the local
Business Coordination Committee, which could be
feasibly occupied by people with intellectual dis-
ability.
(3) Development of a model for skills training and com-
petencies according to the profile of the specific
job position.
(4) Promotion of investment in human capital for the
training of health and educational professionals;
therefore, creating specialized educational programs
that foster independent living skills for people with
intellectual disability.
(5) Evaluation of the impact on government, families,
and labor, in terms of cost–benefit of job training and
workforce integration for persons with intellectual
disability.
(6) Provide available scientific evidence that will justify
universal health coverage for people with intellectual
disability.
(7) Develop a study to evaluate intellectual disability
and its determinants, in its contextual relation with
poverty and economical development.
(8) Training health professionals for early diagnosis and
identification of comorbid conditions in people with
intellectual disability.
Conclusion
Scientific evidence on intellectual disability is the base
for an organized social response.
(1) In terms of health policies related to intellectual
disability in Mexico, the scarcity of human resources
is evident. In addition, the lack of knowledge for
early diagnosis and management guidelines is
observed because of the absence of specific training
for health and education professionals [14].
(2) In this environment, the higher frequency of health
needs by this vulnerable group requires good access
to primary care and services [15].
(3) In order to achieve a successful inclusion in the
community of people with intellectual disability
who live in small residential groups, the need for
certain primary components has been suggested.
These include self-determination developed through
previous training, sufficient skills for community and
home living, the absence of behavioral problems,
periodic planning for recreational activities, good
distribution of free time, and ongoing encouragement
for maintaining contact with families as well as
personal relationships.
(4) Additionally, and very important, is acceptance and
assimilation into the community. This experience
has been previously documented in Mexico and its
impact may be relevant to the creation of public
policies for intellectual disability in the region
[16
] that provide an organized social response not
434 Mental retardation and developmental disorders
only with respect to health needs but particularly also
with respect to social and labor inclusion.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by the National Institute of Public
Health of Mexico and The Center for Integral Training and Development
(CADI, per its abbreviation in Spanish). The affiliate did not influence or
participate in the interpretation of the information; in writing the article;
or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
There are no competing interests. G.K. is director of The Center for
Integral Training and Development and E.L.P. is Director of the
Research Center for Population Health in the National Institute of
Public Health of Mexico.
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have
been highlighted as:
of special interest
of outstanding interest
Additional references related to this topic can also be found in the Current
World Literature section in this issue (p. 485).
1Palma-Coca O, Olaiz-Ferna
´ndez G. Methods of the Mexican National Per-
formance Assessment Survey. Salud Pu
´blica Me
´x 2005; 47 (sup 1):66– 78.
2Lazcano-Ponce E, Rangel-Eudave G, Katz G. Intellectual disability and its
effects on society. Salud Publica Mex 2008; 50 (Suppl 2):s119–s120.
3
Benjet C, Borges G, Medina-Mora ME, et al. Diferencias de sexo en la
prevalencia y severidad de trastornos psiquia
´tricos en adolescentes de la
Ciudad de Me
´xico. Salud Mental 2009; 31:155–163.
This is a report of a population-based study on psychiatric disorders in Mexico that
did not consider information on intellectual disability.
4Medina-Mora ME, Borges G, Mun
˜oz CL, et al. Prevalence of mental disorders
and service use: Results of national survey of psychiatric epidemiology in
Mexico. Salud Mental 2003; 26:1– 16.
5Medina-Mora ME, Borges G, Benjet C, et al. Psychiatric disorders in Mexico:
lifetime prevalence in a nationally representative sample. Br J Psychiatry 2007;
190:521– 528.
6Emerson E. Poverty and people with intellectual disabilities. Ment Retard Dev
Disabil Res Rev 2007; 13:107– 113.
7Olaiz G, Rojas R, Aguilar C, et al. Diabetes mellitus in Mexican adults: results
from the 2000 National Health Survey. Salud Publica Mex 2007; 49 (Suppl 3):
S331– S337.
8Garcıa Cedillo I. De la discapacidad a las necesidades educativas especiales,
en La integracio
´n educativa en el aula. Principios, Fnalidades y Estrategias,
Me
´xico. 2000: 45– 52.
9Wehmeyer ML, Bolding N. Enhanced self-determination of adults with
intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work
or living environments. J Intellect Disabil Res 2001; 45 (Pt 5):371– 383.
10 Llewellyn G, McConnell D, Bye R. Perception of service needs by parents with
intellectual disability, their significant others and their service workers. Res
Dev Disabil 1998; 19:245– 260.
11 Allen-Leigh B, Katz G, Rangel-Eudave G, Lazcano-Ponce E. View of Mexican
family members on the autonomy of adolescents and adults with intellectual
disability. Salud Publica Mex 2008; 50 (Suppl 2):s213–s221.
12 Mansell J, Elliott T, Beadle-Brown J, et al. Engagement in meaningful activity
and ‘active support’ of people with intellectual disabilities in residential care.
Res Dev Disabil 2002; 23:342– 352.
13 Katz G, Rangel G, Allen B, Lazcano-Ponce E. A best practice in education
and support services for independent living of intellectually disabled youth
and adults in Mexico. Salud Publica Mex 2008; 50 (Suppl 2):s194 –
s204.
14 Christian L, Snycerski SM, Singh NN, Poling A. Direct service staff and their
perceptions of psychotropic medication in noninstitutional settings for people
with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res 1999; 43 (Pt 2):88– 93.
15 Smiley E, Cooper SA, Miller SM, et al. Specialist health services for people
with intellectual disability in Scotland. Intellect Disabil Res 2002; 46 (Pt 8):
585– 593.
16
Katz G, Rangel G, Lazcano-Ponce E. Discapacidad intelectual. Me
´xico:
McGraw Hill; 2010.
This is a book in Spanish on intellectual disability and its effects on society in the
context of Mexico and Latin America. The chapters include cutting-edge concept s,
perspectives and research on the social and health needs of individuals with
intellectual disability in Latin America. The chapters discuss etiopathogenesis, and
diverse social, ethical, and rights-related issues of intellectual disability persons. In
this book was included information about access to and quality of health and social
services, sexual and reproductive rights and responsibilities, the need for policy
and interventions to promote physical activity and healthy lifestyles in this popula-
tion, and ways of organizing free time in order to guarantee mental health and well
being.
Perspectives of intellectual disability in Mexico Katz et al. 435