No file available
To read the file of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Search for $X(1870)$ via the decay $J/\psi\to \omega K^+ K^-\eta
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.
Abstract
Using a sample of $(10087\pm 44)\times10^{6}$ $J/\psi$ events collected by the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider, we search for the decay $X(1870)\to K^+ K^-\eta$ via the $J/\psi\to \omega K^+ K^- \eta$ process for the first time. No significant $X(1870)$ signal is observed. The upper limit on the branching fraction of the decay $ J/\psi\to \omega X(1870) \to\omega K^+ K^- \eta$ is determined to be $9.55\times 10^{-7}$ at the $90\%$ confidence level. In addition, the branching faction $B(J/\psi\to\omega K^+ K^- \eta)$ is measured to be $(3.33\pm0.02(\rm{stat.})\pm 0.12(\rm{syst.}))\times 10^{-4}$.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
The upgrade of the Beijing Electron Positron Collider, BEPCII, is now in a good performance for both high energy physics and synchrotron radiation experiments. The luminosity at the design energy of 1.89 GeV reached the design value 1.0*10^33 cm-2 s-1 recently. A lot of work, including accelerator physics study and technical progress , has been done for the luminosity enhancement, not only at the design energy, but all the energy region run for HEP experiments from 1.0 to 2.3 GeV. The performance of BEPCII and the process of luminosity enhancement will be described in detail.
This paper will discuss the design and construction of BESIII, which is designed to study physics in the tau-charm energy region utilizing the new high luminosity BEPCII double ring e(+)e(-) collider. The expected performance will be given based on Monte Carlo simulations and results of cosmic ray and beam tests. In BESIII, tracking and momentum measurements for charged particles are made by a cylindrical multilayer drift chamber in a 1 T superconducting solenoid. Charged particles are identified with a time-of-flight system based on plastic scintillators in conjunction with dE/dx (energy loss per unit pathlength) measurements in the drift chamber. Energies of electromagnetic showers are measured by a Csl(Tl) crystal calorimeter located inside the solenoid magnet. Muons are identified by arrays of resistive plate chambers in a steel magnetic yoke for the flux return. The level 1 trigger system, data acquisition system and the detector control system based on networked computers will also be described.
Geant4 is a toolkit for simulating the passage of particles through matter. It includes a complete range of functionality including tracking, geometry, physics models and hits. The physics processes offered cover a comprehensive range, including electromagnetic, hadronic and optical processes, a large set of long-lived particles, materials and elements, over a wide energy range starting, in some cases, from 250 eV and extending in others to the TeV energy range. It has been designed and constructed to expose the physics models utilised, to handle complex geometries, and to enable its easy adaptation for optimal use in different sets of applications. The toolkit is the result of a worldwide collaboration of physicists and software engineers. It has been created exploiting software engineering and object-oriented technology and implemented in the C++ programming language. It has been used in applications in particle physics, nuclear physics, accelerator design, space engineering and medical physics.
In this paper, the kinematic fitting with the Lagrange multiplier method has been studied for BESIII experiment. First we introduce the Lagrange multiplier method and implement kinematic constraints. Then we present the performance of the kinematic fitting algorithm. With the kinematic fitting, we can improve the resolution of track parameters and reduce the background. © 2010 Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd.
- J Z Bai
J. Z. Bai et al. (BES Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91,
022001 (2003).
- J P Alexander
J. P. Alexander et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev.
D 82, 092002 (2010).
- M Ablikim
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev.
Lett. 108, 112003 (2012).
- M Ablikim
M. Ablikim et al. (BES Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.
95, 262001 (2005).
- M Ablikim
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev.
Lett. 107, 182001 (2011).
- M Ablikim
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev.
Lett. 115, 091803 (2015).
- M Ablikim
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D
99, 071101 (2019).
- M Ablikim
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D
87, 012002 (2013).
- M Ablikim
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C
44, 040001 (2020).
- K X Huang
- Z J Li
- Z Qian
- J Zhu
- H Y Li
- Y M Zhang
K. X. Huang, Z. J. Li, Z. Qian, J. Zhu, H. Y. Li, Y. M.
Zhang et al., Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 142 (2022).
- X Li
X. Li et al., Nucl. Sci. Tech. 1, 13 (2017).
- Y X Guo
Y. X. Guo et al., Nucl. Sci. Tech. 1, 15 (2017).
- P Cao
P. Cao et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 953, 163053 (2020).
- M Ablikim
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C
46, 074001 (2022).
High Energy Phys. Nucl. Phys
- Z Y Deng
Z. Y. Deng et al., High Energy Phys. Nucl. Phys. 30, 371
(2006).
- Y T Liang
- B Zhu
- Z Y You
Y. T. Liang, B. Zhu, Z. Y. You, et al., Nucl. Instrum.
Meth. A603, 325 (2009).
- Z Y You
- Y T Liang
- Y J Mao
Z. Y. You, Y. T. Liang and Y. J. Mao, Chin. Phys. C 32,
572 (2008).
- S Jadach
- B F L Ward
- Z Was
S. Jadach, B. F. L. Ward and Z. Was, Comput. Phys.
Commun. 130, 260 (2000).
- S Jadach
- B F L Ward
- Z Was
S. Jadach, B. F. L. Ward and Z. Was, Phys. Rev. D 63,
113009 (2001).
- D J Lange
D. J. Lange, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462, 152 (2001).
- R L Workman
R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog.
Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
- J C Chen
- G S Huang
- X R Qi
- D H Zhang
- Y S Zhu
J. C. Chen, G. S. Huang, X. R. Qi, D. H. Zhang, and Y.
S. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 62, 034003 (2000).
- E Barberio
- B Van Eijk
- Z Was
E. Barberio, B. van Eijk and Z. Was, Comput. Phys.
Commun. 66, 115 (1991).
- R G Ping
R. G. Ping, Chin. Phys. C 32, 599 (2008).
- X Y Zhou
- S Du
- G Li
X. Y. Zhou, S. Du, G. Li, et al., Comput. Phys. Commun.
258, 107540 (2021).
- N L Johnson
N. L. Johnson, Biometrika 36, 149 (1949).
- M Ablikim
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D
108, 092002 (2023).
- S Das
S. Das, arXiv:1603.08591 (2016).
- G J Feldman
- R D Cousins
G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3873
(1998).
- K Stenson
K. Stenson, arXiv:physics/0605236 (2006).
- M Ablikim
M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), J. High Energ.
Phys. 05, 141 (2024).
- X X Liu
- X R Lü
- Y S Zhu
X. X. Liu, X. R. Lü and Y. S. Zhu, Chin. Phys. C 39,
103001 (2015).