ArticlePDF Available

Delirium and sleep quality in the intensive care unit: the role of melatonin

Authors:
Critical Care Science
https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240083-en
Crit Care Sci. 2024;36:e20240083en
Delirium and sleep quality in the intensive care unit: the role of melatonin
Pedro Henrique Rigotti Soares1, Rodrigo Bernardo Serafim2,3
1 Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Grupo Hospital Conceição - Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.
2 Instituto D’Or de Ensino e Pesquisa - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.
CORRELATION BETWEEN
DELIRIUM
AND SLEEP DISORDERS
Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) frequently face challenges related to delirium and sleep disturbances.(1) Despite
extensive research in recent years, delirium remains a complex condition with uncertain pathophysiology, and its occurrence
is associated with worse outcomes as well as longer durations cognitive and functional impairment.
(1,2)
Although no study
has shown a strong relationship between ICU delirium and sleep to date, the development of delirium and sleep disturbance
in the ICU is often multifactorial, with numerous related risk factors, including age, comorbidities, disease severity,
environmental factors, and iatrogenic interventions.(3)
e lack of evidence supporting the use of pharmacological interventions (such as antipsychotics or sedatives) for delirium
prevention or treatment in the ICU(4) highlights the importance of targeted interventions to mitigate the risk of delirium
and its predisposing conditions.
(3,4)
Current recommendations for delirium prevention emphasize nonpharmacological
measures, such as optimizing human care (eCASH),(5) the well-established A to F bundle,(6) and eorts to minimize
modiable risk factors. e PADIS guidelines maintain that sleep should be routinely monitored, and strategies for sleep
hygiene enhancement should be discussed with patients.
(7)
Despite these eorts, sleep disturbances, such as sleep deprivation,
are still reported by 66% of ICU patients
(8)
and are linked to neurocognitive dysfunction, which further increases the risk
of delirium.(9)
SLEEP QUALITY IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
Sleep in the ICU has been shown to be characterized by subjectively poor quality, high levels of fragmented sleep, and
prolonged sleep latencies. Moreover, nearly 50% ofICU sleepoccurs during the daytime, thus impacting rehabilitation.
Although sleep is considered crucial for patient recovery, little is known about the association of sleep with physiologic
function among critically ill patients or those with clinically essential outcomes in the ICU. Research involving ICU-based
sleep disturbance is challenging due to the lack of objective, practical, reliable, and scalable methods to measure sleep
and the multifactorial etiologies of its disruption.
(10,11)
Electroencephalography studies have described frequent arousal,
an increase in stage 2 non-REM sleep, a reduction or absence of slow-wave stage 3 non-REM sleep, and REM sleep.(10)
e poor quality of sleep in the ICU can be attributed to articial light, increased noise, a consequence of critical illness,
and treatment interventions that aect the day‒night cycle.
(10)
Given the challenges of improving sleep via workow and
environment redesign, pharmacological therapies with traditional sleeping pills, such as benzodiazepines, have been largely
used, thus increasing the risk of developing delirium. Even newer nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics, such as zolpidem or atypical
antipsychotics (not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this purpose), are associated with altered mental
status and in-hospital falls and may lack ecacy even in less acutely ill patients.(11)
THE ROLE OF MELATONIN IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
Melatonin, a hormone produced by the pineal gland, plays a pivotal role in regulating the sleep-wake cycle.
Environmental cues, especially light exposure, inuence its secretion, with peak levels typically occurring at night. In the
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
EDITORIAL
2Soares PH, Serafim RB
Crit Care Sci. 2024;36:e20240083en
ICU, patients are often exposed to articial lighting and
noise, disrupting their circadian rhythm and melatonin
production.
(10)
e evidence of decient melatonin levels
in critically ill patients makes it theoretically reasonable
to expect more signicant eects of melatonin to enhance
sleep quality and consequently reduce delirium incidence
in ICU settings.(12)
However, despite the promising results of melatonin
in improving sleep quality(3) and preventing delirium
in non-ICU settings,(13) the efficacy of melatonin or
ramelteon (a melatonin agonist) in preventing delirium
in the ICU remains a topic of debate, with conicting
ndings reported in recent studies. Two recently published
systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed discordant
results and highlighted several methodological limitations,
such as the relatively low number of patients selected,
heterogeneity of melatonin doses, and the use of dierent
delirium assessment tools.(3,13)
Bandyopadhyay et al. conducted a randomized
controlled trial with a 7-day follow-up to compare
standard care alone or in combination with 3mg of
enteral melatonin once a day. e trial was conducted in
a tertiary ICU in India on patients with a clinical-surgical
prole. e study involved a total of 108 patients, and
measurements of the incidence of delirium were carried
out on days 1, 3, and 7 of hospitalization in the ICU. e
aim of using melatonin was to reduce episodes of delirium
in patients. Although the study was well conducted with
quality randomization and standardization of outcome
assessment methods, it did not demonstrate any benet
of using melatonin to reduce the incidence of delirium by
optimizing the sleep-wake cycle. e results of this trial add
to others who did not demonstrate the benet of using this
medication as prophylaxis and/or treatment for patients
with delirium. e author discussed delirium as a complex
multifactorial disorder with underlying mechanisms
and stated that addressing only one such mechanism
(disruption of the circadian rhythm) may not be enough
to determine the eect size initially aimed for in this study.
However, the study did not use any method to measure the
quality of sleep of patients in each group.(14)
BEDSIDE STRATEGIES FOR
DELIRIUM
AND SLEEP
MANAGEMENT
Nonpharmacological therapies are the cornerstone for
promoting sleep quality and preventing delirium in the
ICU. Strategies for improving sleep hygiene should be
implemented in the ICU environment, including reducing
noise (not exceeding 40 dB), adjusting syringe pump
alarms, ensuring adequate light levels, avoiding procedures
during nighttime, reviewing all current medication and the
possibility of withdrawal (including nicotine or recreational
addictive substances), optimizing ventilator settings, and
even implementing alternative therapies for sleep promotion,
including music, massage, or relaxation techniques.(9)
Given the multifactorial nature of these conditions, a
holistic approach encompassing both pharmacological and
nonpharmacological interventions is essential.
Despite the controversy regarding the use of melatonin in
enhancing sleep quality and potentially reducing the incidence
of delirium, further research is needed to clarify its ecacy
and optimal dosing strategies in the ICU setting. Additionally,
addressing other contributing factors beyond circadian
rhythm disruption may be necessary to achieve meaningful
improvements in delirium prevention and management.
Publisher’s note
Conflicts of interest: None.
Submitted on March 9, 2024
Accepted on March 14, 2024
Corresponding author:
Rodrigo Bernardo Serafim
Departamento de Medicina Interna
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373
Zip code: 21044-020 - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil
E-mail: rodrigobserafim@gmail.com
REFERENCES
1. Ouimet S, Kavanagh BP, Gottfried SB, Skrobik Y. Incidence, risk factors and
consequences of ICU delirium. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(1):66-73.
2. Rego LL, Salluh JI, Souza-Dantas VC, Silva JR, Póvoa P, Serafim RB.
Delirium severity and outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Crit Care
Sci. 2023;35(4):394-401.
3. Gandolfi JV, Di Bernardo AP, Chanes DA, Martin DF, Joles VB, Amendola
CP, et al. The effects of melatonin supplementation on sleep quality
and assessment of the serum melatonin in ICU patients: a randomized
controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(12):e1286-93.
4. Barbateskovic M, Krauss SR, Collet MO, Larsen LK, Jakobsen JC, Perner
A, et al. Pharmacological interventions for prevention and management of
delirium in intensive care patients: a systematic overview of reviews and
meta-analyses. BMJ Open. 2019;9(2):e024562.
5. Vincent JL, Shehabi Y, Walsh TS, Pandharipande PP, Ball JA, Spronk P, et
al. Comfort and patient-centered care without excessive sedation: the
eCASH concept. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(6):962-71.
6. Morandi A, Brummel NE, Ely EW. Sedation, delirium, and mechanical
ventilation: the “ABCDE” approach. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011;17(1):43-9.
7. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJ, Pandharipande
PP, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management
of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in
Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825-73.
Delirium and sleep quality in the intensive care unit 3
Crit Care Sci. 2024;36:e20240083en
8. Shih CY, Wang AY, Chang KM, Yang CC, Tsai YC, Fan CC, et al. Dynamic
prevalence of sleep disturbance among critically ill patients in intensive
care units and after hospitalization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2023;75:103349.
9. Dorsch JJ, Martin JL, Malhotra A, Owens RL, Kamdar BB. Sleep in the
intensive care unit: strategies for improvement. Semin Respir Crit Care
Med. 2019;40(5):614-28.
10. Tiruvoipati R, Mulder J, Haji K. Improving sleep in intensive care unit: an overview
of diagnostic and therapeutic options. J Patient Exp. 2020;7(5):697-702.
11. Owens RL. Better sleep in the intensive care unit: blue pill or red pill or no
pill? Anesthesiology. 2016;125(5):835-7.
12. Yan W, Li C, Song X, Zhou W, Chen Z. Prophylactic melatonin for delirium
in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial
sequential analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(43):e31411.
13. Aiello G, Cuocina M, La Via L, Messina S, Attaguile GA, Cantarella G, et al.
Melatonin or ramelteon for delirium prevention in the intensive care unit:
a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J
Clin Med. 2023;12(2):435.
14. Bandyopadhyay A, Yaddanapudi LN, Saini V, Sahni N, Grover S,
Puri S, et al. Efficacy of melatonin in decreasing the incidence of
delirium in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial Crit Care Sci.
2024;36:20240144en.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To determine whether enteral melatonin decreases the incidence of delirium in critically ill adults. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, adults were admitted to the intensive care unit and received either usual standard care alone (Control Group) or in combination with 3mg of enteral melatonin once a day at 9 PM (Melatonin Group). Concealment of allocation was done by serially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. The intensivist assessing delirium and the investigator performing the data analysis were blinded to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium within 24 hours of the intensive care unit stay. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of delirium on Days 3 and 7, intensive care unit mortality, length of intensive care unit stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and Glasgow outcome score (at discharge). Results: We included 108 patients in the final analysis, with 54 patients in each group. At 24 hours of intensive care unit stay, there was no difference in the incidence of delirium between Melatonin and Control Groups (29.6 versus 46.2%; RR = 0.6; 95%CI 0.38 - 1.05; p = 0.11). No secondary outcome showed a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Enteral melatonin 3mg is not more effective at decreasing the incidence of delirium than standard care is in critically ill adults.
Article
Full-text available
Objective To investigate the impact of delirium severity in critically ill COVID-19 patients and its association with outcomes. Methods This prospective cohort study was performed in two tertiary intensive care units in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. COVID-19 patients were evaluated daily during the first 7 days of intensive care unit stay using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and Confusion Method Assessment for Intensive Care Unit-7 (CAM-ICU-7). Delirium severity was correlated with outcomes and one-year mortality. Results Among the 277 COVID-19 patients included, delirium occurred in 101 (36.5%) during the first 7 days of intensive care unit stay, and it was associated with a higher length of intensive care unit stay in days (IQR 13 [7 - 25] versus 6 [4 - 12]; p < 0.001), higher hospital mortality (25.74% versus 5.11%; p < 0.001) and additional higher one-year mortality (5.3% versus 0.6%, p < 0.001). Delirium was classified by CAM-ICU-7 in terms of severity, and higher scores were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (17.86% versus 34.38% versus 38.46%, 95%CI, p value < 0.001). Severe delirium was associated with a higher risk of progression to coma (OR 7.1; 95%CI 1.9 - 31.0; p = 0.005) and to mechanical ventilation (OR 11.09; 95%CI 2.8 - 58.5; p = 0.002) in the multivariate analysis, adjusted by severity and frailty. Conclusion In patients admitted with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit, delirium was an independent risk factor for the worst prognosis, including mortality. The delirium severity assessed by the CAM-ICU-7 during the first week in the intensive care unit was associated with poor outcomes, including progression to coma and to mechanical ventilation. Keywords: Delirium; COVID-19; Coronavirus infections; Critical illness; Psychiatric status rating scales; Surveys and questionnaires; Risk factors; Prognosis; Critical care outcomes; Intensive care units
Article
Full-text available
Melatonin modulates the circadian rhythm and has been studied as a preventive measure against the development of delirium in hospitalized patients. Such an effect may be more evident in patients admitted to the ICU, but findings from the literature are conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We assessed whether melatonin or ramelteon (melatonin agonist) reduce delirium incidence as compared to a placebo in ICU patients. Secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and mortality. Estimates are presented as risk ratio (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Nine RCTs were included, six of them reporting delirium incidence. Neither melatonin nor ramelteon reduced delirium incidence (RR 0.76 (0.54, 1.07), p = 0.12; I 2 = 64%), although a sensitivity analysis conducted adding other four studies showed a reduction in the risk of delirium (RR = 0.67 (95%CI 0.48, 0.92), p = 0.01; I 2 = 67). Among the secondary outcomes, we found a trend towards a reduction in the duration of MV (MD −2.80 (−6.06, 0.47), p = 0.09; I 2 = 94%) but no differences in ICU-LOS (MD −0.26 (95%CI −0.89, 0.37), p = 0.42; I 2 = 75%) and mortality (RR = 0.85 (95%CI 0.63, 1.15), p = 0.30; I 2 = 0%). Melatonin and ramelteon do not seem to reduce delirium incidence in ICU patients but evidence is weak. More studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Up to 80% of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) suffer from delirium. Studies on the preventative use of melatonin in the ICU have produced mixed results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether early administration of melatonin reduces the prevalence of delirium in critically ill patients. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials comparing melatonin or melatonin agonists to placebo in ICU setting. The population included adult patients in the ICU. The primary outcome was the prevalence of delirium. Secondary outcomes included duration of delirium, delirium-free day, serum melatonin concentration, need for sedation, duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS), all-cause mortality, sleep quality, and adverse events. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed on the primary outcome to prevent the risk of random error and multiplicity phenomenon as a result of repeated significance testing across all the included trials. Results: Twelve trials with a total of 2538 patients were analyzed. When all trials were pooled, the incidence of delirium in ICU patients who received melatonin was significantly lower than in those who received placebo (risk ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.96; I2 = 56%). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes including duration of delirium, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, and mortality. TSA indicated that Z-curve crossed the traditional boundary, but did not cross the monitoring boundary for benefit, which indicated that it is still inconclusive that melatonin affects the incidence of delirium. Conclusions: This meta-analysis found that early administration of melatonin may result in a decreased delirium prevalence in critically ill patients. However, the sensitivity analysis of high-quality studies did not support this finding. In addition, TSA demonstrated that the result may have false-positive error. Therefore, this finding should be interpreted with caution. Further studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of prophylactic melatonin on the prevalence and duration of ICU delirium in the future.
Article
Full-text available
Good quality sleep is considered to be essential for healthy living and recovering from illness. It would be logical to think that good quality sleep is most required when a patient is critically ill in an intensive care unit (ICU). Several studies have demonstrated poor quality of sleep while the patients are in ICU. Subjective tools such as questionnaires while simple are unreliable to accurately assess sleep quality. Relatively few studies have used standardized polysomnography. The use of novel biological markers of sleep such as serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations may help in conjunction with polysomnography to assess sleep quality in critically ill patients. Attempts to improve sleep included nonpharmacological interventions including the use of earplugs, eye sleep masks, and pharmacological agents including ketamine, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and benzodiazepines. The evidence for these interventions remains unclear. Further research is needed to assess quality of sleep and improve the sleep quality in intensive care settings.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives We assessed the evidence from reviews and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials on the effects of pharmacological prevention and management of delirium in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods We searched for reviews in July 2017 in: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, BIOSIS Previews, CINAHL and LILACS. We assessed whether reviews were systematic according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and assessed the methodological quality using ROBIS. Outcome measures Primary outcomes: all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, prevention of delirium and management of delirium. Secondary outcomes: quality of life; non-serious adverse events and cognitive function. Results We included 378 reviews: 369 narrative reviews, eight semisystematic reviews which failed on a maximum of two arbitrary PRISMA criteria and one systematic review fulfilling all 27 PRISMA criteria. For the prevention of delirium, we identified the one systematic review and eight semisystematic reviews all assessing the effects of alpha-2-agonists. None found evidence of a reduction of mortality (systematic review RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.24). The systematic review and three semisystematic reviews found no evidence of an effect for the prevention of delirium (systematic review RR 0.85, 0.63 to 1.14). Conversely, four semisystematic reviews found a beneficial effect. Serious adverse events, quality of life, non-serious adverse events and cognitive function were not assessed. We did not identify any systematic or semisystematic reviews addressing other pharmacological interventions for the prevention of delirium. For the management of manifest delirium, we did not identify any systematic or semisystematic review assessing any pharmacological agents. Conclusion Based on systematic reviews, the evidence for the use of pharmacological interventions for prevention or management of delirium is poor or sparse. A systematic review with low risk of bias assessing the effects of pharmacological prevention of delirium and management of manifest delirium in ICU patients is urgently needed. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016046628.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To update and expand the 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the ICU. Design: Thirty-two international experts, four methodologists, and four critical illness survivors met virtually at least monthly. All section groups gathered face-to-face at annual Society of Critical Care Medicine congresses; virtual connections included those unable to attend. A formal conflict of interest policy was developed a priori and enforced throughout the process. Teleconferences and electronic discussions among subgroups and whole panel were part of the guidelines' development. A general content review was completed face-to-face by all panel members in January 2017. Methods: Content experts, methodologists, and ICU survivors were represented in each of the five sections of the guidelines: Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption). Each section created Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome, and nonactionable, descriptive questions based on perceived clinical relevance. The guideline group then voted their ranking, and patients prioritized their importance. For each Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome question, sections searched the best available evidence, determined its quality, and formulated recommendations as "strong," "conditional," or "good" practice statements based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation principles. In addition, evidence gaps and clinical caveats were explicitly identified. Results: The Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) panel issued 37 recommendations (three strong and 34 conditional), two good practice statements, and 32 ungraded, nonactionable statements. Three questions from the patient-centered prioritized question list remained without recommendation. Conclusions: We found substantial agreement among a large, interdisciplinary cohort of international experts regarding evidence supporting recommendations, and the remaining literature gaps in the assessment, prevention, and treatment of Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) in critically ill adults. Highlighting this evidence and the research needs will improve Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) management and provide the foundation for improved outcomes and science in this vulnerable population.
Article
Background Sleep disturbance is a common complaint among critically ill patients in intensive care units and after hospitalisation. However, the prevalence of sleep disturbance among critically ill patients varies widely. Objective To estimate the prevalence of sleep disturbance among critically ill patients in the intensive care unit and after hospitalisation. Methods Electronic databases were searched from their inception until 15 August 2022. Only observational studies with cross-sectional, prospective, and retrospective designs investigating sleep disturbance prevalence among critically ill adults (aged ≥ 18 years) during intensive care unit stay and after hospitalisation were included. Results We found 13 studies investigating sleep disturbance prevalence in intensive care units and 14 investigating sleep disturbance prevalence after hospitalisation, with 1,228 and 3,065 participants, respectively. The prevalence of sleep disturbance during an ICU stay was 66 %, and at two, three, six and ≥ 12 months after hospitalisation was 64 %, 49 %, 40 %, and 28 %, respectively. Studies using the Richards–Campbell Sleep Questionnaire detected a higher prevalence of sleep disturbance among patients in intensive care units than non-intensive care unit specific questionnaires; studies reported comparable sleep disturbance prevalence during intensive care stays for patients with and without mechanical ventilation. Conclusion Sleep disturbance is prevalent in critically ill patients admitted to an intensive care unit and persists for up to one year after hospitalisation, with prevalence ranging from 28 % to 66 %. The study results highlight the importance of implementing effective interventions as early as possible to improve intensive care unit sleep quality.
Article
Objectives: To evaluate whether the use of exogenous melatonin affects sleep, reduces the prevalence of delirium, and decreases the need for analgosedation and to assess whether serum melatonin indices correlate with exogenous administration in critically ill patients. Design: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Setting: Multicenter ICUs of two tertiary hospitals. Patients: A total of 203 adult patients who were admitted to the ICU and administered with analgesics and/or sedatives. Interventions: Oral melatonin (10 mg) or placebo for up to seven consecutive nights. Measurements and main results: The number of observed sleeping hours at night was assessed by the bedside nurse. Sleep quality was evaluated using the Richards Campbell Questionnaire Sleep (RCSQ). The prevalence of delirium, pain, anxiety, adverse reactions, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU and hospital stays, and doses of sedative and analgesic drugs administered were recorded. The use of analgesics and sedatives was assessed daily. Melatonin levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Based on the RCSQ results, sleep quality was assessed to be better in the melatonin group than that in the placebo group with a mean (SD) of 69.7 (21.2) and 60.7 (26.3), respectively (p = 0.029). About 45.8% and 34.4% of participants in the melatonin and placebo groups had very good sleep (risk ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.94-1.89), whereas 3.1% and 14.6% had very poor sleep (risk ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.71), respectively. No significant difference was observed regarding the days free of analgesics or sedatives, the duration of night sleep, and the occurrence of delirium, pain, and anxiety. Melatonin serum peak levels at 2 AM were 150 pg/mL (range, 125-2,125 pg/mL) in the melatonin group and 32.5 pg/mL (range, 18.5-35 pg/mL) in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Melatonin was associated with better sleep quality, which suggests its possible role in the routine care of critically ill patients in the future.
Article
Sleep in the intensive care unit (ICU) is considered to be subjectively poor, highly fragmented, and sometimes referred to as "atypical." Although sleep is felt to be crucial for patient recovery, little is known about the association of sleep with physiologic function among critically ill patients, or those with clinically important outcomes in the ICU. Research involving ICU-based sleep disturbance is challenging due to the lack of objective, practical, reliable, and scalable methods to measure sleep and the multifactorial etiologies of its disruption. Despite these challenges, research into sleep-promoting techniques is growing and has demonstrated a variety of causes leading to ICU-related sleep loss, thereby motivating multifaceted intervention efforts. Through a focused review of (1) sleep measurement in the ICU; (2) outcomes related to poor sleep in the ICU; and (3) ICU-based sleep promotion efforts including environmental, nonpharmacological, and pharmacological interventions, this paper examines research regarding sleep in the ICU and highlights the need for future investigation into this complex and dynamic field.