A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Quality & Quantity
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Quality & Quantity
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01820-7
1 3
Financial determinants ofgovernance scores inhospitality
andtourism enterprises
HasanEvrimArici1,5· HuseyinArasli2 · MehmetAliKoseoglu3·
MehmetBahriSaydam4 · VictorOluwafemiOlorunsola4
Accepted: 10 December 2023
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024
Abstract
While the importance of robust corporate governance in hospitality and tourism (H&T)
enterprises is widely acknowledged among scholars in the fields of H&T and general
management, existing literature reveals several gaps, inconclusive findings, and disparate
conclusions. In addressing these gaps and advancing scientific understanding, this study
delves into the estimation of governance scores in H&T enterprises through an exploration
of financial indicators. Leveraging the Thomson Reuters Eikon database and employing
machine learning methodologies such as bagging, random forest, and boosted regression
algorithms, our research identifies the most influential predictors of governance scores.
Our results highlight that assets/equity emerges as the most potent predictor of shareholder
score in H&T businesses, while the composition of independent board members is identi-
fied as the paramount predictor of both governance score and management score. Beyond
contributing to the scholarly discourse, our study holds significant practical implications.
By elucidating the nexus between financial metrics and governance ratings, our findings
empower H&T businesses to strategically align their governance mechanisms, fostering
enhanced corporate governance practices.
Keywords Corporate governance score· Shareholder score· Financial indicators·
Machine learning· Hospitality and tourism
1 Introduction
Corporate governance aims to address interest conflicts between management and share-
holders, as well as between large and small shareholders thereby loweringagency issues
(Rani etal. 2014; Olorunsola etal. 2023). According to the agency hypothesis, organ-
izations with greater corporate governance standards outperform their rivals because
they have lower agency costs and more effective monitoring procedures (Bonazzi and
Islam 2007). Improved corporate governance systems, as (Ngobo and Fouda 2012),
decrease uncertainty between shareholders and executives. Several studies use primary
and survey-based data on corporate governance structure at the business level within a
certain industry. Several studies found a link between governance methods and financial
Extended author information available on the last page of the article
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.