ArticlePDF Available

A Case Report on the Hidden Lesion of the Knee: Ramp Lesion

Authors:

Abstract

Introduction Ramp lesions, often associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, exhibit a varied incidence rate of 9–42%, increasing with delayed ACL reconstruction. These lesions, resulting from abnormal tibial movements and semimembranosus muscle contraction, are challenging to diagnose due to their hidden nature in standard magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy procedures. Case Report This report examines the case of a ramp lesion in the context of a multi-ligament injured knee of a 34-year-old male. The patient had a complete ACL, medial collateral ligament, and avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament with a type 1 ramp lesion. These findings were confirmed by arthroscopy and were treated with arthroscopic reconstruction of the ligament and all inside repair of the ramp lesion. We report the pertinent imaging findings relevant to the ramp lesions. Conclusion Ramp lesions present a significant diagnostic and treatment challenge in orthopedic practice. Enhanced imaging techniques and a deeper understanding of their pathophysiology are crucial for an accurate diagnosis.
Introduction
The posteromedial knee ramp lesions, likened to ramps for their
shape, have been known since 1983 but have gained recent
attention due to their association with ACL injuries. These
lesions, first termed “Ramp lesions” by Michael J. Strobel, involve
the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial
meniscus. For years, these injuries were often overlooked in
magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) and ar throscopies,
primarily because standard MRI procedures, conducted with the
knee fully extended, obscured the posteromedial space. In
addition, specific examination techniques, like the trans-notch
view and assessment of the medial meniscus posterior horn
mobility, are necessary for their diagnosis, leading to them being
termed hidden lesions.”
Their significance has risen in line with the quest to perfect ACL
reconstructions, as ramp lesions affect both anterior and
rotational knee stability. In the literature, ramp lesions are
typically def ine d as longitudinal or oblique superior
meniscocapsular junction tears or meniscotibial ligament tears,
often <2 cm, and usually accompanying ACL tears. In this report,
we present the imaging findings associated with a ramp tear in a
young male with multiple ligamentous injuries to the knee.
Case Report
Here, we report a 34-year-old male presented with knee injury
Author’s Photo Gallery
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i03.4306
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License htt ps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-
sa/4.0/, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
105
Dr. Arun AramDr. Iffath Misbah Dr. Aashika Parveen Amir
Case Report
Access this article online
Website:
www.jocr.co.in
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i03.4306
1Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Address of Correspondence:
Dr. Iffath Misbah,
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tami Nadu, India.
E-mail: iffathmisbahcp@gmail.com
© 2024 Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports Published by Indian Orthopaedic Research Group |
Submitted: 28/11/2023; Review: 27/12/2023; Accepted: February 2024; Published: March 2024
Dr. Aadithiyan Sekar
Journal of Or thopaedic Case Reports 2024 March:14(3):Page 105-108
1 1 1 1
Iffath Misbah , Arun Aram , Aashika Parveen Amir , Aadithiyan Sekar
Introduction: Ramp lesions, often associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, exhibit a varied incidence rate of 9–42%,
increasing with delayed ACL reconstruction. These lesions, resulting from abnormal tibial movements and semimembranosus muscle
contraction, are challenging to diagnose due to their hidden nature in standard magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy procedures.
Case Report: This report examines the case of a ramp lesion in the context of a multi-ligament injured knee of a 34-year-old male. The patient
had a complete ACL, medial collateral ligament, and avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament with a type 1 ramp lesion. These findings were
confirmed by arthroscopy and were treated with arthroscopic reconstruction of the ligament and all inside repair of the ramp lesion. We report
the pertinent imaging findings relevant to the ramp lesions.
Conclusion: Ramp lesions present a significant diagnostic and treatment challenge in orthopedic practice. Enhanced imaging techniques and a
deeper understanding of their pathophysiology are crucial for an accurate diagnosis.
Keywords: Ramp, hidden lesion, magnetic resonance imaging, arthroscopy.
Abstract
Learning Point of the Article:
Ramp lesions are complex and challenging to diagnose due to their hidden nature in standard imaging procedures, necessitating advanced
magnetic resonance imaging techniques or arthroscopic intervention for accurate detection.
A Case Report on the Hidden Lesion of the Knee: Ramp Lesion
www.jocr.co.in
following a collision injury with a moped. He was unable to
weight bear and walk following the injury and was subjected to
an imaging assessment after preliminary management of the
acute knee injury. Plain radiographs of the knee were obtained
and demonstrated an increased valgus opening, indicating a
medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury (Fig. 1). On the MRI,
complete disruption of the mid substance of the ACL and a
minimally displaced posterior cruciate ligament injury were
observed. The lateral collateral ligament was intact; however,
the MCL was torn on the tibial side and found to be retracted.
Regarding the menisci, the Lateral menisci had a complex
posterior horn tear, and the medial meniscus had a horizontal
cleavage tear of the posterior horn. Strikingly, there was an
irregularity in the posterior
margin of the menisco-capsular
junction with fluid filling, and
this could be attributed to the
r a m p l e s i o n ( F i g . 2 ) .
Subsequently, he was taken up
for arthroscopic surgery, which
confirmed the presence of a
ramp tear (Fig. 3). The order of
re co ns tr uc ti on wa s A CL
reconstruction, medial and
lateral meniscal repair, ramp
repair, a nd f ina lly, me dia l
collateral ligament repair was
performed. The PCL was left to
conservative management.
Discussion
Ramp lesions, often associated with ACL tears, vary in
inc id en ce fr om 9% to 42% , i nc rea si ng wh en AC L
reconstruction is delayed beyond 3 months. Jiang et al. [1]
found 20 cases of ramp lesions without complete ACL tears,
linked instead to ACL longitudinal splits, suggesting minimal
anterior instability and semimembranosus contraction as
potential causes (Fig. 1). The true prevalence of ramp lesions,
either alone or with ACL tears, is unclear due to difficulties in
detection through MRI and arthroscopy. Notably, their
incidence is consistent across adult and pediatric populations,
contrasting with the higher prevalence of other meniscal
106
Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports Volume 14 Issue 3 March 2024 Page 105-108 | | |
Misbah I, et al
Figure 1: Patho mechanics of Ramp lesion.
Figure 2: Arthroscopic view of the posterior joint, depicting the
ramp lesion (separated capsule from the posterior meniscal
attachment).
Figure 3: T2 weighted magnetic resource imaging demonstrating
the posterior irregularity at the meniscocapsular junction.
107
Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports Volume 14 Issue 3 March 2024 Page 105-108 | | |
injuries in younger age groups [2, 3].
Ramp lesions after an ACL tear are mainly due to excessive
anterior tibia movement, causing semimembranosus muscle
contraction and stressing the surrounding ligaments. This
stress, coupled with the medial meniscus being compressed
between the articular surfaces, leads to these lesions. They can
also result from valgus injuries involving internal tibia rotation
and axial loading or as a contrecoup injury from pivoting
movements causing varus strain and femur rotation on the tibia,
leading to meniscus trapping and tearing.
The sensitivity of 3.0-T MRI (83.3%) was superior to 1.5-T
MRI (67.6%), according to Hatayama et al. [4]. Irregularity at
the posterior margin and complete fluid filling were the most
sensitive findings for detecting ramp lesions on MRI, according
to Yeo et al. [5] and Laurens et al. [6]. Consecutive sagittal
im ag es s er ve to de te rm in e w hi ch reg io ns of th e
meniscocapsular junction and posterior horn are torn. Axial
images help to assess the mediolateral dimensions of the same
lesions. Salient features on MRI [7] are detailed in Table 1.
Meniscal ramp lesions have no consented treatment at the
present time. Research has shown that ramp lesions in the
context of acute ACLR may recover without surgical
intervention if the surrounding biological conditions are
appropriate. Some have suggested that ramp lesions should be
surgically addressed rather than being let to heal on its own due
to the hypermobility of the separated meniscocapsular
component. There are data to suggest that individuals with
similar longitudinal meniscal tear patterns who have ACLR
without first having surgery may benefit from nonsurgical
treatment. This is against the general view that ramp lesions
should be addressed when there is chronic ACL insufficiency
[8-10].
Conclusion
These lesions result from abnormal tibia movement and
semimembranosus contraction, often undetected due to
diagnostic challenges. They occur consistently across all age
groups, unlike other meniscal injuries. Advanced MRI
techniques offer improved detection, with specific imaging
features aiding in their identification. Treatment approaches for
Table 1: Summary of positive and negative findings for ramp lesions.
www.jocr.co.in
Misbah I, et al
www.jocr.co.in
108
ramp lesions remain debated, with some cases responding to
nonsurgical methods, particularly in acute ACLR contexts,
while others advocate for surgical intervention, especially in
chronic ACL insufficiency.
Clinical Message
A suspicious irregularity in the posterior meniscopcapsular junction
should raise suspicion of ramp lesions, and it is imperative to confirm
this during knee arthroscopy by probing the meniscocapsular
junction posteriorly.
Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports Volume 14 Issue 3 March 2024 Page 105-108 | | |
Declaration of patient consent: The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form,
the patient has given the consent for his/ her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient
understands that his/ her names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but
anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Conflict of interest: Nil Source of support: None
1. Jiang J, Ni L, Chen J. Isolated meniscal ramp lesion without
obvious anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Orthop Surg
2021;13:402-7.
2. Malatray M, Raux S, Peltier A, Pfirrmann C, Seil R, Chotel F.
Ramp lesions in ACL deficient knees in children and
adolescent population: A high prevalence confirmed in
intercondylar and posteromedial exploration. Knee Surg
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018;26:1074-9.
3. Qalib YO, Tang Y, Wang D, Xing B, Xu X, Lu H. Ramp lesion
of the medial meniscus. EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:372-9.
4. Hatayama K, Terauchi M, Saito K, Aoki J, Nonaka S, Higuchi
H. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of medial meniscal
ramp lesions in patients with anterior cruciate ligament
injuries. Arthroscopy 2018;34:1631-7.
5. Yeo Y, Ahn JM, Kim H, Kang Y, Lee E, Lee JW, et al. MR
evaluation of the meniscal ramp lesion in patients with anterior
cruciate ligament tear. Skeletal Radiol 2018;47:1683-9.
6. Laurens M, Cavaignac E, Fayolle H, Sylvie R, Lapègue F,
Sans N, et al. The accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of ramp
lesions. Skeletal Radiol 2022;51:525-33.
7. Greif DN, Baraga MG, Rizzo MG, Mohile NV, Silva FD, Fox
T, et al. MRI appearance of the different meniscal ramp lesion
types, with clinical and arthroscopic correlation. Skeletal
Radiol 2020;49:677-89.
8. Chahla J, Dean CS, Moatshe G, Mitchell JJ, Cram TR,
Yacuzzi C, et al. Meniscal ramp lesions: anatomy, incidence,
di ag no si s, an d tr ea tm ent . Or th op J S po rt s Me d
2016;4:2325967116657815.
9. Seil R, Hoffmann A, Scheffler S, Theisen D, Mouton C, Pape
D. Ramp lesions : Tips and tricks in diagnostics and therapy.
Orthopade 2017;46:846-54.
10. DePhillipo NN, Cinque ME, Chahla J, Geeslin AG,
Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF. Incidence and detection of
meniscal ramp lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in
patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J
Sports Med 2017;45:2233-7.
How to Cite this Article
Misbah I, Aram A, Amir AP, Sekar A. A Case Report on the Hidden
Lesion of the Knee: Ramp Lesion. Journal of Orthopaedic Case
Reports 2024 March;14(3): 105-108.
Conflict of Interest: Nil
Source of Support: Nil
______________________________________________
Consent: The authors confirm that informed consent was
obtained from the patient for publication of this case report
References
Misbah I, et al
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Ramp lesion of the medial meniscus used to be completely disregarded in the past. Ramp lesion has been now put under the spotlight by orthopaedic and sport medicine surgeons and requires attention. It is closely associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Major risk factors include chronic laxity, lateral meniscal lesion, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revision, anterolateral ligament tear concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament injury, time from injury, pre-operative side-to-side laxity > 6 mm, age < 30 years old, male sex, etc. Radiologists attempt to create diagnostic criteria for ramp lesion using magnetic resonance imaging. However, the only definite method to diagnose ramp lesion is still arthroscopy. Various techniques exist, among which posteromedial approach is the most highly recommended. Various treatment options are available. The success rate of ramp repair is very high. Major complications are uncommon. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:372-379. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200126
Article
Full-text available
Objectives The purpose of the present paper was to study isolated meniscal ramp lesions without obvious ACL rupture. Their biomechanical mechanisms were analyzed and their clinical characteristics were reviewed. The clinical effects of an all‐inside horizontal mattress suture for isolated ramp lesions were evaluated. Materials and Methods Twenty isolated meniscal ramp lesion patients without obvious ACL rupture from 2015 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative MRI showed intact ACL and signs of ramp lesions. These isolated ramp lesions were arthroscopically confirmed and repaired through an all‐inside horizontal mattress suturing method. MRI was performed 3 months postoperatively to assess isolated ramp lesion healing. The Tegner–Lysholm score and the visual analog scale score were recorded preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed to determine statistical significance. Results Arthroscopic exploration confirmed isolated ramp lesions and longitudinal ACL splits or degeneration without obvious ACL rupture. MRI 3 months postoperatively showed healing of the isolated ramp lesions. At 2 years postoperatively, the VAS scores were significantly decreased and the Tegner–Lysholm scores were significantly increased. Knee function, without pain, was restored in all patients, including walking, climing and descending stairs, and squatting. Conclusion Isolated meniscal ramp lesions without obvious ACL rupture may exist because of ACL longitudinal splits or degeneration and can be repaired through anterolateral and anteromedial portals with an all‐inside horizontal‐mattress suturing method.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Meniscal ramp lesions have been reported to be present in 9% to 17% of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Detection at the time of arthroscopy can be accomplished based on clinical suspicion and careful evaluation. Preoperative assessment via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to have a low sensitivity in identifying meniscal ramp lesions. Purpose: To investigate the incidence of meniscal ramp lesions in patients with ACL tears and the sensitivity of preoperative MRI for the detection of ramp lesions. Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All patients who underwent ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2016 were included in this study, and patients with medial meniscal ramp lesions found at the time of arthroscopy were identified. The sensitivity of MRI compared with the gold standard of arthroscopic evaluation was determined by review of the preoperative MRI musculoskeletal radiologist report, mimicking the clinical scenario. The incidence was calculated based on arthroscopic findings, and the potential secondary signs of meniscal ramp tears were evaluated on MRI. Results: In a consecutive series of 301 ACL reconstructions, 50 patients (33 male, 17 female) with a mean age of 29.6 years (range, 14-61 years) were diagnosed with a medial meniscal ramp lesion at arthroscopic evaluation (16.6% incidence). The sensitivity of MRI for ramp lesions was 48% based on the preoperative MRI report. A secondary finding of a posteromedial tibial bone bruise was identified on preoperative MRI in 36 of the 50 patients with ramp lesions in a retrospective MRI review by 2 orthopaedic surgeons. Conclusion: Medial meniscal ramp lesions were present in approximately 17% of 301 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, and less than one-half were diagnosed on the preoperative MRI. A posteromedial tibial bone bruise was found to be a secondary sign of a ramp lesion in 72% of patients. Increased awareness of this potentially combined injury pattern is necessary, and careful intraoperative evaluation is required to identify all meniscal ramp tears.
Article
Full-text available
Meniscal ramp lesions are more frequently associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries than previously recognized. Some authors suggest that this entity results from disruption of the meniscotibial ligaments of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, whereas others support the idea that it is created by a tear of the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans have been reported to have a low sensitivity, and consequently, ramp lesions often go undiagnosed. Therefore, to rule out a ramp lesion, an arthroscopic evaluation with probing of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus should be performed. Several treatment options have been reported, including nonsurgical management, inside-out meniscal repair, or all-inside meniscal repair. In cases of isolated ramp lesions, a standard meniscal repair rehabilitation protocol should be followed. However, when a concomitant ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is performed, the rehabilitation should follow the designated ACLR postoperative protocol. The purpose of this article was to review the current literature regarding meniscal ramp lesions and summarize the pertinent anatomy, biomechanics, diagnostic strategies, recommended treatment options, and postoperative protocol.
Article
Objectives To assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in diagnosing ramp lesions in patients with an acute lesion of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).Materials and methodsAll consecutive patients over 15 years of age who underwent surgical repair of the ACL at a single hospital between January and May 2019, with MRI data available, were included in this retrospective study, except patients who had previous knee surgery. The gold standard was arthroscopic evaluation. Two trained radiologists with 5 and 14 years of experience did a blinded review of the MRIs. The following pathological signs were studied: complete fluid filling between the capsule and the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, irregular appearance of the posterior wall of the medial meniscus, oedema of the capsule, fluid hyperintensity in contact with the medial meniscus and anterior subluxation of the medial meniscus. Logistic regressions in univariate then multivariate analysis were carried out and measures of diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement were calculated with R software (version 3.6).ResultsFifty-seven patients were included. Twelve had a ramp lesion diagnosed by arthroscopy (21%). Only complete fluid hyperintensity between the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and the capsule was significantly associated with ramp lesions (P value < 0.01). The diagnostic accuracy of this specific sign was moderate, with a specificity of 84%, sensitivity of 75%, PPV of 56%, NPV of 93% and a good level of inter-observer agreement (k = 0.79).Conclusion The complete fluid filling is the only significant pathological MRI sign for ramp lesions, with moderate accuracy.
Article
Background Meniscal ramp lesions have been defined as longitudinal vertical peripheral tears of the medial meniscus involving the posterior meniscocapsular ligament, meniscotibial ligament, and/or the red-red zone of the posterior horn. They are heavily associated with anterior cruciate ligament injuries, and because of their potentially important biomechanical role in knee stabilization, injuries to this region may require surgical repair. However, due to their location and lack of general knowledge regarding their different types and associated appearances on magnetic resonance imaging, ramp lesions are routinely underreported. This is compounded by the fact that ramp lesions are also often overlooked during conventional anterior portal arthroscopy when direct visualization is not achieved.PurposeTo demonstrate MRI appearances and arthroscopic findings of the different types of meniscal ramp lesions, in the hopes of improving their detection on pre-operative imaging.
Article
Objective: To identify the findings on magnetic resonance imaging most strongly associated with meniscal ramp lesions in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament tear. Subjects and methods: Seventy-eight consecutive patients (mean age, 33.7 years; 64 male, 14 female) with an arthroscopically proven anterior cruciate ligament tear were included in this retrospective study. The presence of the following six features on magnetic resonance images were recorded: complete fluid filling between the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and the capsule margin; edema affecting the posterior capsule; irregularity of the medial meniscus at the posterior margin; fluid at the periphery of the medial meniscus; the corner notch sign; and a vertical tear at the medial meniscus. Findings at arthroscopy served as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and interobserver agreement were calculated. Results: Seven ramp lesions were noted on arthroscopy (9%). Findings of irregularity at the posterior margin (p = 0.001) and complete fluid filling between the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and the capsule margin (p = 0.004) on magnetic resonance imaging were significantly associated with the presence of a ramp lesion. With the irregularity at the posterior margin, sensitivity was 86% and specificity was 79%. Complete fluid filling sign showed sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 92%. Concordance of the two readers for the six magnetic resonance imaging features was fair to very good (k = 0.38-0.91). Conclusions: Irregularity at posterior margin and complete fluid filling were most sensitive findings for detecting of a ramp lesion on magnetic resonance imaging.
Article
Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing ramp lesions, to compare them between 1.5- and 3-T MRI, and to evaluate whether bone contusion of the posterior lip of the medial tibial plateau was associated with ramp lesions. Methods: For 155 knees that underwent primary ACL reconstruction, we prospectively examined for ramp lesions and medial meniscal body tears on MRI. MRI diagnosis of ramp lesions required high signal irregularity of the capsular margin or separation in the meniscocapsular junction of the medial meniscus posterior horn on sagittal images. Bone contusion of the posterior lip of the medial tibial plateau was verified in 105 knees with MRI performed within 6 weeks after injury. All ramp lesions were identified by transcondylar observation during surgery. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for ramp lesions and body tears were measured. Furthermore, we evaluated whether bone contusion of the medial tibial plateau was associated with ramp lesions. The χ-square test was used for statistical analysis. Results: During surgery, ramp lesions were observed in 46 knees and medial meniscal body tears were seen in 35 knees. The sensitivity of MRI for ramp lesions was 71.7% and specificity was 90.5%. The sensitivity for ramp lesions was significantly lower than that for meniscal body tears (94.3%) (P = .01). The sensitivity of 3-T MRI (83.3%) was superior to that of 1.5-T MRI (67.6%), but not significantly different. The incidence of bone contusions was not significantly different among ramp lesions (38.5%), body tears (40.0%), or no tears (30.5%). Conclusions: The sensitivity of MRI for diagnosing ramp lesions was significantly lower than that for medial meniscal body tears. Bone contusion of the posterior lip of the medial tibial plateau on MRI was not associated with ramp lesions. Level of evidence: Level III, comparative trial.
Article
Purpose: Ramp lesions are common in ACL deficient knees. Their diagnosis is difficult and, therefore, they may be underestimated. So far, no study analyzed their prevalence in a pediatric population. The diagnosis of these Ramp lesions is of major clinical relevance because of a frequent misestimating and technic difficulties. Ramp lesions might be associated with residual knee pain and instability after ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of ramp lesions explored through a systematic intercondylar and posteromedial arthroscopic approach during an ACL reconstruction in a pediatric and adolescent population. Methods: Children and adolescents who underwent an ACL reconstruction were screened prospectively between October 2014 and 2016. The presence or absence of a ramp lesion was evaluated after each of three arthroscopic steps: (1) an anterior approach, (2) an intercondylar inspection, and (3) a posteromedial approach. Ramp lesions were screened at each step and their prevalence was evaluated. Furthermore, their presence was correlated to age, weight, size, sex, and state of the physis (open or closed). Finally, the meniscal status on MRI and arthroscopic findings were compared. Results: Fifty-six patients were analyzed. The median age was 14.0 ± 1.3 years (12-17). The median interval between injury and surgery was 11.5 months (1-108). During step 1 (anterior approach), only 1 ramp lesion (2%) was diagnosed. 13 (23%) ramp lesions were found after inspection through the intercondylar notch. No additional lesions were found with a direct view through the posteromedial approach. No correlation between ramp lesions and side, sex, weight, size, or state of physis was found. 10 ramp lesions out of 13 could not be diagnosed on MRI. Conclusions: The prevalence of ACL-associated ramp lesions in children and adolescents is similar to adult populations. A systematic inspection through the intercondylar notch is recommended during ACL reconstruction to make a precise diagnosis. The posteromedial approach is essentially useful for meniscal repair LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Testing, previously developed diagnostic criteria in a consecutive series of patients and a universally applied "gold" standard, Level I.
Ramp lesions :Tips and tricks in diagnostics and therapy
  • R Seil
  • A Hoffmann
  • S Scheffler
  • D Theisen
  • C Mouton
  • D Pape
Seil R, Hoffmann A, Scheffler S, Theisen D, Mouton C, Pape D. Ramp lesions : Tips and tricks in diagnostics and therapy. Orthopade 2017;46:846-54.