No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Erdheim-Chester Disease With Eyelid and Orbital Involvement: A Review of Treatment Modalities at One Institution From 2014 to 2022
Abstract
Purpose
To review all cases of Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD) with orbital involvement treated at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute in Miami, Florida from 2014 to 2022 and compare presentations, treatment modalities, and outcomes.
Methods
A retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with ECD who presented to Bascom Palmer Eye Institute from 2014 to 2022 was performed. Data collected included demographics, pretreatment history and ophthalmic examination, pathology report, treatment, subsequent examination, and relevant laboratory results. Histopathology, treatments, and outcomes were reviewed and compared between patients.
Results
Four cases were included. Primary treatments included vemurafenib (n = 2), cobimetinib (n = 1), and prednisone (n = 1). All patients demonstrated improvement of ophthalmic symptoms. Vemurafenib was the only medical treatment that was tolerated well and resulted in significant improvement in proptosis despite some reported dry eye; all other medications were discontinued due to intolerable side effects.
Conclusions
BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib have been used as novel therapy in the treatment of ECD. Vemurafenib demonstrated its utility in reducing proptosis in ECD patients at one ophthalmic institution. Vemurafenib may be a favorable treatment option for BRAF -positive ECD patients presenting with orbital disease.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ECD is considered to have rapid progression and poor prognosis. Studies have shown that vemurafenib is effective for ECD patients with orbital involvement, but not for ECD with multiple organs. The refinement of treatment approaches and the increased awareness of ECD have led to a dramatic improvement in prognosis.
Background
Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD) is a rare histiocytic disorder characterized by multisystem xanthogranulomatous infiltration by lipid-laden histiocytes. We report two cases of ECD involving the orbit and describe their clinicopathologic factors, treatments, and prognosis. One was a rare case of ECD complicated with primary thrombocytosis.
Case presentation
This study describes two patients with bilateral orbital ECD. Both presented with proptosis and visual loss; imaging findings showed bilateral intraorbital masses. Both had different degrees of systemic symptoms (pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, ascites, and heart failure) before the ocular symptoms and did not find the cause before ophthalmic tumor resection and pathological biopsy. The diagnosis of ECD was confirmed after pathological biopsy and detection of BRAFV600E mutation. Patient 2 also with primary thrombocytosis and had a CALR mutation as well as the BRAFV600E mutation. Both patients were recommended to receive targeted therapy. Patient 1 refused targeted therapy for financial reasons and was discharged after local radiotherapy only. The patient had no light perception in either eye and no improvement in systemic symptoms. Patient 2 began targeted treatment after diagnosis and reached the discharge criteria 2 weeks later. He is in good condition at present, but unfortunately, his eyesight has not improved because of the irreversible damage to his visual function.
Conclusion
ECD is easily misdiagnosed and missed because of its rarity and diverse clinical manifestations. Orbital involvement is common in ECD, and surgery is the most frequently employed approach. Despite the surgical resection is not curative, its significance lies in biopsy to establish diagnosis and/or surgical debulking to relieve mass effect, minimizing further impairment of visual function. Targeted therapy is the most effective treatment for patients with a positive BRAF mutation gene. Evaluation of a concomitant myeloid neoplasm is also critical before initiating targeted therapies for refractory ECD.
Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in the treatment of BRAF(V600E)-mutated Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) . Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data, response rate, adverse events and survival of 12 patients with ECD treated with vemurafenib from March 2015 to October 2020 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Results: Of 12 patients [7 males and 5 females, median age = 51.5 (range, 32-66) years old], the median number of organs involved was 6 (range, 4-8) , and the median treatment duration of vemurafenib was 11 (3-60) months. All patients had improvement of clinical symptoms, of which 2 cases were completely relieved, and 10 cases were partially relieved. Seven patients evaluated by (18)F-FDG-positron emission tomography/computed tomography achieved a metabolic response, including 2 patients with a complete metabolic response and 5 patients with a partial metabolic response. The common adverse events in the overall cohort were grade 1 to 2 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0) , including skin rash (58.3%) , arthralgia (25.0%) , and digestive tract reactions (16.7%) . The median follow-up time was 13.5 (3-60) months. One patient with central nervous system involvement died due to a cerebrovascular event, and one patient relapsed 10 months after drug withdrawal. The estimated 2-year overall survival rate and 2-year progression free survival rate were 88.89% and 66.67%, respectively. Conclusions: Vemurafenib is safe and effective in the treatment of BRAF(V600E)-mutated ECD.
Opinion Statement
BRAF mutations are present in up to 8% of human cancers, and comprise a viable therapeutic target in many patients harboring these mutations. Specific BRAF-targeted therapies, such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and encorafenib, have transformed treatment of many BRAF-mutated cancers, producing meaningful clinical benefit with more tolerable safety profiles compared to prior standard-of-care treatments. BRAF inhibitors were first approved for use in metastatic melanoma, although resistance almost always limited their long-term effectiveness. Combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has proven effective in delaying the onset of resistance, and produces additional clinical benefit across cancers. Although not promising initially in treatment of BRAF-mutated colorectal carcinoma, BRAF inhibitors in colorectal cancer were successfully combined with EGFR inhibitors, resulting in significant treatment response. Refining the use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in less common tumor types (and for non-V600 mutations) and delaying the development of resistance remain pertinent future considerations in treating BRAF-mutated cancers. In this review, we will discuss the prevalence of BRAF mutations across human cancers and evidence on the efficacy and safety of current management strategies for various BRAF-mutant solid tumors.
Our rechallenge of cobimetinib in an Erdheim‐Chester Disease (ECD) patient for the rare adverse effect, “dropped head syndrome,” with a previously unexplored cobimetinib regimen was successful. Similar to other experiences with targeted agents in ECD, dosing of cobimetinib may vary to mitigate toxicity without impairing efficacy. Our rechallenge of cobimetinib in an Erdheim‐Chester Disease (ECD) patient for the rare adverse effect, “dropped head syndrome,” with a previously unexplored cobimetinib regimen was successful. Similar to other experiences with targeted agents in ECD, dosing of cobimetinib may vary to mitigate toxicity without impairing efficacy.
Immunoglobulin-G4 (IgG4)-related disease (IgG4RD) is a fibro-inflammatory disorder characterized by tissue-infiltrating IgG4⁺ plasma cells, and, often, high serum IgG4. Several autoimmune, infectious, or proliferative conditions mimic IgG4RD. Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis, characterized by foamy histiocytic infiltration, fibrosis, and chronic inflammation. ECD and IgG4RD manifestations may overlap.
A patient presented with huge fibrous retroperitoneal masses causing compression on neighboring structures; the case posed the challenge of the differential diagnosis between IgG4RD and ECD mainly because of a prominent serum and tissue IgG4 response.
Retroperitoneal biopsy led to the diagnosis of ECD; the V600E BRAF mutation was found. Treatment with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib was started.
Treatment failed to induce mass regression and the patient died after 3 months of therapy. Prompted by this case, we examined serum and tissue IgG4 in a series of 15 ECD patients evaluated at our center, and found that approximately one-fourth of the cases have increased IgG4 in the serum and often in the tissue.
The differential diagnosis between IgG4RD and ECD can be challenging, as some ECD patients have prominent IgG4 responses. This suggests the possibility of common pathogenic mechanisms between ECD and IgG4RD.
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis, to whose pathogenesis neoplastic and immune-mediated mechanisms contribute. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-inhibitors have anti-proliferative and immunosuppressive properties. We here tested the efficacy and safety of the mTOR-inhibitor sirolimus plus prednisone in patients with ECD. Prednisone was given initially at 0.75 mg/kg/day, tapered to 5-2.5 mg/day by month 6. Target sirolimus blood levels were 8-12 ng/mL. Treatment was continued for at least 24 months in patients who showed disease stabilisation or improvement. Ten patients were enrolled; eight achieved stable disease or objective responses, while two had disease progression. Responses were mainly observed at the following sites: retroperitoneum in 5/8 patients (62.5%), cardiovascular in 3/4 (75%), bone in 3/9 (33.3%), central nervous system (CNS) in 1/3 (33.3%). The median follow-up was 29 months (interquartile range 16.5-74.5); two patients died, respectively of progressive CNS disease and small-cell lung cancer. Treatment-related toxicity was mild. Using immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence on ECD biopsies, we detected expression in foamy histiocytes of the phosphorylated forms of mTOR and of its downstream kinase p70S6K, which indicated mTOR pathway activation. In conclusion, sirolimus and prednisone often induce objective responses or disease stabilisation and may represent a valid treatment for ECD.
Copyright © 2015 American Society of Hematology.
Background:
The combined inhibition of BRAF and MEK is hypothesized to improve clinical outcomes in patients with melanoma by preventing or delaying the onset of resistance observed with BRAF inhibitors alone. This randomized phase 3 study evaluated the combination of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib.
Methods:
We randomly assigned 495 patients with previously untreated unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma to receive vemurafenib and cobimetinib (combination group) or vemurafenib and placebo (control group). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival.
Results:
The median progression-free survival was 9.9 months in the combination group and 6.2 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death or disease progression, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.68; P<0.001). The rate of complete or partial response in the combination group was 68%, as compared with 45% in the control group (P<0.001), including rates of complete response of 10% in the combination group and 4% in the control group. Progression-free survival as assessed by independent review was similar to investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Interim analyses of overall survival showed 9-month survival rates of 81% (95% CI, 75 to 87) in the combination group and 73% (95% CI, 65 to 80) in the control group. Vemurafenib and cobimetinib was associated with a nonsignificantly higher incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher, as compared with vemurafenib and placebo (65% vs. 59%), and there was no significant difference in the rate of study-drug discontinuation. The number of secondary cutaneous cancers decreased with the combination therapy.
Conclusions:
The addition of cobimetinib to vemurafenib was associated with a significant improvement in progression-free survival among patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma, at the cost of some increase in toxicity. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; coBRIM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01689519.).
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare histiocytic disorder that is challenging to diagnose and treat. We performed molecular analysis of BRAF in the largest cohort of ECD patients studied to date followed by N/KRAS, PIK3CA, and AKT1 mutational analysis in BRAF wild-type patients. Forty-six of 80 (57.5%) of patients were BRAFV600E-mutant. NRAS mutations were detected in 3 of 17 ECD BRAFV600E wild-type patients. PIK3CA mutations (p.E542K, p.E545K, p.A1046T, and p.H1047R) were detected in 7 of 55 patients, 4 of whom also had BRAF mutations. Mutant NRAS was present in peripheral blood CD14(+) cells, but not lymphoid cells, from an NRASQ61R mutant patient. Our results underscore the central role of RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK activation in ECD and identify an important role of activation of RAS-PI3K-AKT signaling in ECD. These results provide a rationale for targeting mutant RAS or PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in the subset of ECD patients with NRAS or PIK3CA mutations.
Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) is a rare non-Langerhans histiocytosis. Recent findings suggest that ECD is a clonal disorder, marked by recurrent BRAFV600E mutations in more than 50% of patients, in which chronic uncontrolled inflammation is an important mediator of disease pathogenesis. Although approximately 500-550 cases have been described in the literature to date, increased physician awareness has driven a dramatic increase in ECD diagnoses over the last decade. ECD frequently involves multiple organ systems and has historically lacked effective therapies. Given the protean clinical manifestations and the lack of a consensus-derived approach for the management of ECD, we provide here the first multidisciplinary consensus guidelines for the clinical management of ECD. These recommendations were outlined at the First International Medical Symposium for ECD, comprised of a comprehensive group of international academicians with expertise in the pathophysiology and therapy of ECD. Detailed recommendations on the initial clinical, laboratory, and radiographic assessment of ECD patients are presented in addition to treatment recommendations based on critical appraisal of the literature and clinical experience. These formalized consensus descriptions will hopefully facilitate ongoing and future research efforts in this disorder.
Erdheim-Chester disease is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. The disease is widely variable in its severity, ranging from incidental findings in asymptomatic patients to a fatal multisystem illness. CNS involvement occurs in up to one-half of patients, most often leading to diabetes insipidus and cerebellar dysfunction. Imaging findings in neurologic Erdheim-Chester disease are often nonspecific, and the disease is commonly mistaken for close mimickers. Nevertheless, there are many imaging manifestations of Erdheim-Chester disease that are highly suggestive of the disease, which an astute radiologist could use to accurately indicate this diagnosis. This article discusses the imaging appearance, histologic features, clinical manifestations, and management of Erdheim-Chester disease.
To determine the frequency, characteristics, and clinical course of ophthalmic side effects associated with systemic BRAF inhibitor therapy. Medical records of patients taking BRAF inhibitors for the treatment of systemic malignances at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from 01/01/2010 to 08/30/2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Of 901 patients, 14 (1.6%) patients experienced an ophthalmic side effect. Mean age at presentation of the side effect was 60 years (median 59, range 50-80) and 11 (79%) were male. The most common side effect was uveitis in 7 (50%) patients, followed by dry eye in 4 (29%) patients, and central serous chorioretinopathy in 2 (14%) patients, with singular cases of cranial nerve VI palsy and conjunctival edema. A comparison between individual BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib vs. dabrafenib vs. encorafenib) revealed that patients taking encorafenib had a shorter interval to any ophthalmic adverse event (mean 55.6 vs. 9.8 vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.03) and were the only patients to experience documented dry eye syndrome (DES) in this series. Outcomes were known in 13 (93%) patients, and ophthalmic adverse effects resolved or were controlled without discontinuing therapy in 10 (77%). Uveitis was successfully treated with topical corticosteroids in 4 patients, while 3 patients with refractory uveitis (2 with panuveitis and 1 with unspecified uveitis) required discontinuation of BRAF inhibitor therapy. Ophthalmic adverse events related to systemic BRAF inhibitor use are rare, with estimated frequency of 1.6%. Most events can be treated with local ophthalmic therapy. BRAF inhibitors provide life-saving therapy, and their discontinuation should be avoided.
Purpose:
To provide a comprehensive review of ocular and orbital manifestations of Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) and compare clinical outcomes with vemurafenib (INN) to historical treatments (HT). Primary outcomes are ophthalmic findings on presentation, changes in visual acuity, and mortality rate. Secondary outcomes include the progression of ocular findings, systemic involvements, and treatment modalities.
Methods:
All published literature from January 1983 to March 2021 was searched for ophthalmic manifestations of ECD. Clinical outcomes following HT were collected and compared with INN.
Results:
Forty-seven patients with ECD and ophthalmic presentations were identified. The mean age was 49.6 years (SD = 15.0). Proptosis (65.6%) and extraocular muscle restrictions (42.5%) were the most common presenting signs. Of 41 (87.2%) patients with orbital masses on radiologic examination, 90.2% were bilateral, and 53.7% were located in the intraconal space. Ophthalmic examination was significant for xanthelasma (27.2%), optic disc edema (34.0%), and subretinal changes (21.3%). Common treatments were systemic steroids (76.6%), interferon-α (17.0%), and cyclophosphamide (14.9%). INN was less commonly used (12.8%). The mean change in logMAR visual acuity declined with HT (29.9%) but improved with INN (79.1%) (p > 0.05). The proportion of eyes with complete vision loss increased after HT (p < 0.05). The overall mortality rate was 27.7% and notably higher in the HT group (29.3%) when compared to the INN group (16.7%) (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
ECD presents with many ophthalmic manifestations. Although the intraocular treatments remain controversial, INN should be highly considered in treating orbital ECD patients with BRAF-V600E mutations to prevent and reverse vision loss.
Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD) is a rare clonal histiocytic neoplasm with less than 1200 documented cases to date. The disease is life-threatening and difficult to recognize, although increasing awareness as well as the integration of clinical, imaging, pathology information and genetic studies have led to a recent exponential increase in new reported cases.. ECD affects multiple organs and systems, including skeletal, neurologic, and cardiovascular. Pulmonary, retroperitoneal, and cutaneous lesions have also been reported in various combinations. Until the discovery that more than half of ECD patients harbor the BRAF-V600E mutation or other mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and RAS pathways, Interferon-a was the first-line treatment. Nowadays BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors targeted therapies are the mainstay of treatment. Ophthalmologic involvement occurs in 25-30% of ECD cases, usually in the form of orbital involvement presenting with exophthalmos and ophthalmoplegia. Other ophthalmologic manifestations include palpebral xanthelasmas, anterior uveitis and vitritis, optic disk edema, choroidal infiltration, recurrent serous retinal detachment, retinal drusen–like deposits and etinal pigment epithelial changes. ECD patients can also present with ocular symptoms as a result of adverse effects of the treatment regimens. In some cases with smoldering or protean symptoms, the emergence of eye manifestations triggered the diagnosis. Ophthalmologists have to be aware of the disease, recognize the constellation of ECD symptoms, and contribute to the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of ECD patients.
This article provides an overview of the pathologic features of adult orbital xanthogranulomatous disease, a rare heterogeneous group of disorders that includes 4 clinical syndromes: adult-onset xanthogranuloma, necrobiotic xanthogranuloma, adult-onset asthma and periocular xanthogranuloma, and Erdheim-Chester disease. The diagnosis is made by biopsy of the lesion, demonstrating tissue infiltration by the hallmarks of xanthoma cells and Touton giant cells. The differential diagnosis is broad, including syndromes within the adult xanthogranulomatous disease category as well as other entities involving the eyelid and the orbital tissues. Because of its rarity and sometimes close similarity to other disease entities, it is often misdiagnosed initially. This article focuses on the morphology and immunohistochemical patterns in diagnosis of adult orbital xanthogranulomatous disease with emphasis on adult-onset asthma and periocular xanthogranuloma in particular, its clinical features and associated systemic manifestations in differential diagnosis, as well as the current management strategy.
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare histiocytosis that was recently recognized as a neoplastic disorder owing to the discovery of recurrent activating MAP-kinase (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK) pathway mutations. Typical findings of ECD include central diabetes insipidus, restrictive pericarditis, perinephric fibrosis, and sclerotic bone lesions. The histopathologic diagnosis of ECD is often challenging due to non-specific inflammatory and fibrotic findings on histopathologic review of tissue specimens. Additionally, the association of ECD with unusual tissue tropism and an insidious onset often results in diagnostic errors and delays. Most patients with ECD require treatment, except for a minority of patients with minimally symptomatic single-organ disease. The first ECD consensus guidelines were published in 2014 on behalf of the physicians and researchers within the Erdheim-Chester Disease Global Alliance. With the recent molecular discoveries and the approval of the first targeted therapy (vemurafenib) for BRAF-V600-mutant ECD, there is a need for updated clinical practice guidelines to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. This document presents consensus recommendations that resulted from the International Medical Symposia on ECD in 2017 and 2019. Herein, we include the guidelines for the clinical, laboratory, histologic, and radiographic evaluation of ECD patients along with treatment recommendations based on our clinical experience and review of literature in the molecular era.
Purpose of review:
Significant advances have been made in oncology and rheumatology with the introduction of molecularly targeted agents (MTAs). MTAs consist of monoclonal antibodies and small molecule inhibitors. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the recent applications of MTAs to orbital, lacrimal, and eyelid disease.
Recent findings:
The use of monoclonal antibodies has been described in the treatment of orbital vascular lesions, lymphoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. Inflammatory conditions treated with monoclonal antibodies include thyroid eye disease, IgG4 disease, and granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has also found applications to orbital disease. Use of small molecule inhibitors has been described in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and Erdheim-Chester disease. There are many orbital, lacrimal, and eyelid side effects of MTAs with which the oculoplastic surgeon should be familiar, including hypertrichosis, edema, and orbital and eyelid inflammation.
Summary:
MTAs represent the future of treatment of oncologic and inflammatory conditions. Application of these agents to orbital, lacrimal, and eyelid disease will continue to expand. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms of oculoplastic disorders will facilitate additional potential pathways that could be targeted for therapy.
Erdheim-Chester disease is a rare xanthogranulomatous systemic disease, which involves the orbit in some cases. Through this case report, the authors review the treatment modalities used in orbital Erdheim-Chester disease and explore a newer modality of treatment. Cases of orbital Erdheim-Chester disease were identified in the literature utilizing a PubMed search and all the treatment modalities were reviewed. The response to treatment of orbital Erdheim-Chester disease has been poor with the various medical and surgical treatment modalities used in the past. The authors report the use of BRAF inhibitor with a remarkable response in our case.
Purpose:
To compare and contrast the clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and genetic features of patients with ocular adnexal IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) and patients with adult ocular adnexal xanthogranulomatous disease (XG).
Methods:
This retrospective review study identified patients with histological evidence of either disease from records of the pathology department of our hospital from 1996 to 2014. Clinical, imaging, and a variety of histopathologic features were collected for 23 patients with IgG4-RD and 13 patients with XG. Next generation sequencing with a 50-gene cancer screening panel was performed on biopsy tissues from 10 patients in each group.
Results:
Statistical differences between the 2 groups include eyelid (67%; p = 0.0002) and anterior orbital (75%; p = 0.0352) predilection for XG except for Erdheim-Chester disease subgroup which was more posterior and diffuse. Eyelid involvement was rare (4%) for IgG4-RD. Involvement of orbital nerves was seen in 30% of IgG4-RD and 0% in XG (p = 0.0695). Five patients with IgG4-RD developed malignancy (4 lymphoma, 1 leiomyosarcoma), but none of XG patients. Discriminating pathological features were the presence of any IgG4+ plasma cells (p = 0.0121) and the ratio of IgG4+/IgG+ plasma cells (p =0.0294) for IgG4-RD. Five of 12 (42%) patients with XG had sufficient numbers of IgG4+ plasma cells/high power field to fulfill published diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RD, and 5 (42%) had a ratio of IgG4+/IgG+ plasma cells over 40%, but the numbers overall were less than seen in the IgG4-RD patients. The only genetic difference between the 2 groups was that BRAF V600E mutation was found in 1 of the 2 Erdheim-Chester disease patients, which form a subgroup of XG.
Conclusions:
IgG4-RD and XG share clinical, imaging, and histopathological features including IgG4+ plasma cells. Significant differences were the eyelid involvement in XG, orbital nerve involvement, and an elevated IgG4+/IgG+ ratio in IgG4-RD and the only genetic abnormality found was BRAF V600E mutation in the Erdheim-Chester disease subgroup of XG.
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is rare form of non-Langerhans cells histiocytosis with multiorgan involvement. Individuals are more frequently affected in their fifth decade and there is a slight male prevalence. Recent studies have demonstrated that ECD patients bare mutations in the proto-oncogene BRAF (and more rarely in other genes involved in the MAPK activation pathway), suggesting a critical role of this pathway in the pathogenesis and a possible clonal origin of the disease. Clinical manifestations are extremely protean and virtually every organ system can be affected. The most common clinical features include skeletal involvement with typical bilateral osteosclerotic lesions of long bones of the lower limbs, diabetes insipidus, cardiovascular involvement with circumferential thickening of the aorta ("coated aorta"), and retroperitoneal fibrosis ("hairy kidney"). Cardiovascular and central nervous system (CNS) involvement are associated with the worst prognosis. Biopsy is necessary to establish a definite diagnosis with the identification of CD68+/CD1a-/S100- foamy histiocytes. Currently, interferon-α is the first-line treatment in ECD, as it has been clearly demonstrated to increase overall survival. Anakinra and infliximab have also led to encouraging results and should be taken into consideration when treatment with interferon-α fails. More recently, the BRAF-inhibitor vemurafenib has been used in small groups of ECD patients with optimal efficacy in all treated cases. Nevertheless, its adverse effects and the scanty data on its long-term efficacy and safety still discourage its use as a first-line option. Further studies are still warranted to better understand and treat this neglected and overlooked disease.
Copyright © 2015 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Purpose:
To determine the frequency of ocular adverse effects associated with vemurafenib (PLX4032) treatment for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Design:
Retrospective review of the clinical study reports from the clinical pharmacology, phase 1, phase 2, and phase 3 trials of vemurafenib.
Methods:
The vemurafenib clinical trials were a multicenter series involving adult patients with histologically confirmed, BRAF(V600) mutation-positive, unresectable, stage IIIC or IV melanoma. A total of 855 patients were enrolled in the trials: 568 patients were treated with vemurafenib and 287 patients were treated with dacarbazine.
Results:
Among the 568 patients treated with vemurafenib, ocular adverse effects developed in 22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.5-25.6). The most common ocular diagnosis was uveitis (4.0%; 95% CI, 2.6-6.0), followed by conjunctivitis (2.8%; 95% CI, 1.6-4.5) and dry eyes (2.0%; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7). All were successfully managed while vemurafenib therapy was continued.
Conclusions:
Ocular adverse events and symptoms may be seen in more than one-fifth of patients being treated with vemurafenib. However, vemurafenib can be continued while the ocular symptoms are being managed. The pathogenesis of ocular symptoms in this patient population is unclear; additional studies are necessary.
: The authors report a case of adult orbital xanthogranuloma with associated adult-onset asthma in a 44-year-old man. Adult orbital xanthogranuloma was diagnosed on the basis of the clinical findings of bilateral, indurated, yellow eyelid lesions in a patient presenting with adult-onset asthma. Incisional biopsy of the eyelid lesions demonstrated a diffuse histiocytic infiltrate of the orbit and Touton giant cells without evidence of necrobiosis. Systemic evaluation failed to show evidence of bone lesions or paraproteinemia. When patients present with atypical indurated yellow eyelid lesions, a biopsy should be considered. If Touton giant cells are present, a systemic evaluation should be undertaken to rule out both Erdheim-Chester disease and necrobiotic xanthogranuloma. If no systemic findings are present, other than the possibility of adult-onset asthma, the rare entity of adult orbital xanthogranuloma should be considered.