ArticlePublisher preview available

Population genetic structure and demographic history of the timber tree Dicorynia guianensis in French Guiana

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Tropical rainforests host exceptional biodiversity and provide important ecosystem services, but they are facing anthropogenic and climatic threats. Preserving the genetic diversity of forest tree populations is essential for their capacity to adapt and exhibit resilience to environmental changes and anthropogenic pressures. Here, we collected conservation genetic baseline information for the heavily exploited timber tree Dicorynia guianensis Amshoff (Fabaceae) at the regional and local levels in French Guiana. Based on genotyping at five microsatellite loci in 1566 individuals collected in 23 forest locations, we documented the genetic differentiation of locations from the West of French Guiana and identified distinctive genetic diversity patterns with higher genetic diversity and some bottlenecked sites in the East and inland. The regional population genetic structure is likely the result of past population isolation in distinct Pleistocene refuges and different demographic histories potentially influenced by Holocene drought periods or palaeofires. Assessment of spatial genetic structure (Sp from 0 to 0.028) in five intensively sampled locations yielded estimates of Wright’s neighborhood size of 35 to 313, indicative of restricted dispersal and local metapopulation dynamics, and useful as baseline information to assess the effects of selective logging for conservation management. These results support the current management strategies with low impact extraction of D. guianensis in three zones of the French Guiana permanent forest domain and allow us to make recommendations for further research and management to best preserve its genetic diversity and adaptive potential.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Tree Genetics & Genomes (2024) 20:2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-023-01633-7
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Population genetic structure anddemographic history ofthetimber
tree Dicorynia guianensis inFrench Guiana
JulienBonnier1,2 · NiklasTysklind2 · ValérieTroispoux2 · IvanScotti3 · StéphanieBarthe4·
OlivierBrunaux5 · StéphaneGuitet5 · StéphaneTraissac2 · MyriamHeuertz1
Received: 18 January 2023 / Revised: 26 November 2023 / Accepted: 4 December 2023 / Published online: 26 December 2023
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023
Abstract
Tropical rainforests host exceptional biodiversity and provide important ecosystem services, but they are facing anthropo-
genic and climatic threats. Preserving the genetic diversity of forest tree populations is essential for their capacity to adapt
and exhibit resilience to environmental changes and anthropogenic pressures. Here, we collected conservation genetic base-
line information for the heavily exploited timber tree Dicorynia guianensis Amshoff (Fabaceae) at the regional and local
levels in French Guiana. Based on genotyping at five microsatellite loci in 1566 individuals collected in 23 forest locations,
we documented the genetic differentiation of locations from the West of French Guiana and identified distinctive genetic
diversity patterns with higher genetic diversity and some bottlenecked sites in the East and inland. The regional population
genetic structure is likely the result of past population isolation in distinct Pleistocene refuges and different demographic
histories potentially influenced by Holocene drought periods or palaeofires. Assessment of spatial genetic structure (Sp from
0 to 0.028) in five intensively sampled locations yielded estimates of Wright’s neighborhood size of 35 to 313, indicative of
restricted dispersal and local metapopulation dynamics, and useful as baseline information to assess the effects of selective
logging for conservation management. These results support the current management strategies with low impact extraction
of D. guianensis in three zones of the French Guiana permanent forest domain and allow us to make recommendations for
further research and management to best preserve its genetic diversity and adaptive potential.
Keywords Tropical tree· Microsatellites· Genetic diversity· Neighborhood size· Conservation· Dicorynia guianensis
Introduction
Tropical rainforests occur in wet tropical habitats around the
equator, with the largest ones found in South America, West-
ern Equatorial Africa, and Southeast Asia. They represent
the world’s most complex and biodiverse terrestrial ecosys-
tems with a total area estimated at 12 million km2 harboring
a continuous canopy of tall trees (Gay 2001; Leigh Jr etal.
2004). There are an estimated 16,000 species of trees in the
Amazon lowland rainforest (ter Steege etal. 2013). Rainfor-
ests provide many ecosystem services that play a vital role
in the survival and quality of life of humans and other spe-
cies, e.g., the purification of air and water and the mitigation
of floods and droughts (Ambe and Onnoghen 2019). Many
rainforest regions around the globe are under acute threat of
habitat and biodiversity loss because of agricultural develop-
ment, mining, overexploitation of timber and non-timber for-
est products, and climate change (Alfaro etal. 2014; Roberts
etal. 2017). Genetic diversity within species is paramount
Communicated by N. Tomaru.
* Myriam Heuertz
myriam.heuertz@inrae.fr
1 BIOGECO, INRAE, Univ. Bordeaux, 69 Route d’Arcachon,
33610Cestas, France
2 ECOFOG, INRAE, Agroparistech, CNRS, Cirad, Université
Des Antilles, Univ. de La Guyane, 97310Kourou,
FrenchGuiana
3 Ecologie Des Forêts Méditerranéennes, URFM, INRAE,
84000Avignon, France
4 Office Français de La Biodiversité, Unité
Technique Connaissance, Campus Agronomique,
BP316–97319Kouroucedex, FrenchGuiana
5 ONF, R&D, Réserve de Montabo, BP 7002,
97307CayenneCedex, FrenchGuiana
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Preprint
Full-text available
The delay between environmental changes and the corresponding genetic responses within populations is a common but surprisingly overlooked phenomenon in ecology, evolutionary and conservation genetics. This time lag problem can lead to erroneous conservation assessments when solely relying on genetic data. We identify population size, life-history traits, reproductive strategies and the severity of population decline as the main determinants of time lags, evaluate potential confounding factors affecting genetic parameters during time lags, and propose methodological approaches that allow controlling for them. Considering the current unprecedented rate of genetic diversity and species loss, we expect our novel interpretive and methodological framework for time lags to stimulate further research and discussion on the most appropriate approaches to analyse genetic diversity for conservation.
Preprint
Full-text available
Effective population size (Ne) is a pivotal evolutionary parameter with crucial implications in conservation practice and policy. Genetic methods to estimate Ne have been preferred over demographic methods because they rely on genetic data rather than time-consuming ecological monitoring. Methods based on linkage disequilibrium, in particular, have become popular in conservation as they require a single sampling and provide estimates that refer to recent generations. A recently developed software based on linkage disequilibrium, GONE, looks particularly promising to estimate contemporary and recent-historical Ne (up to 200 generations in the past). Genomic datasets from non-model species, especially plants, may present some constraints to the use of GONE, as linkage maps and reference genomes are seldom available, and SNPs genotyping is usually based on reduced-representation methods. In this study, we use empirical datasets from four plant species to explore the limitations of plant genomic datasets when estimating Ne using the algorithm implemented in GONE, in addition to exploring some typical biological limitations that may affect Ne estimation using the linkage disequilibrium method, such as the occurrence of population structure. We show how accuracy and precision of Ne estimates potentially change with the following factors: occurrence of missing data, limited number of SNPs/individuals sampled, and lack of information about the location of SNPs on chromosomes, with the latter producing a significant bias, previously unexplored with empirical data.
Article
Full-text available
Genetic diversity among and within populations of all species is necessary for people and nature to survive and thrive in a changing world. Over the past three years, commitments for conserving genetic diversity have become more ambitious and specific under the Convention on Biological Diversity’s (CBD) draft post-2020 global biodiversity framework (GBF). This Perspective article comments on how goals and targets of the GBF have evolved, the improvements that are still needed, lessons learned from this process, and connections between goals and targets and the actions and reporting that will be needed to maintain, protect, manage and monitor genetic diversity. It is possible and necessary that the GBF strives to maintain genetic diversity within and among populations of all species, to restore genetic connectivity, and to develop national genetic conservation strategies, and to report on these using proposed, feasible indicators.
Article
Full-text available
Estimates of contemporary effective population size (Ne) can provide valuable information for genetic conservation and monitoring, pinpointing populations at higher risk of genetic erosion, decreased fitness, maladaptation and, ultimately, demographic decline. There are however potential limitations in the application of commonly employed genetic estimators of contemporary Ne to widespread forest tree populations. Genetic isolation by distance within populations, small and spatially restricted samples, among-population gene flow and overlapping generations are factors that can potentially affect the accuracy of marker-based estimates of contemporary Ne, depending on the demographic scenario. In particular, we illustrate the uncertainty faced by forest researchers and managers when interpreting contemporary Ne estimates obtained for continuously distributed tree populations with large census size N. To that end, we use previously published genotypic data of 21 Pinus pinaster populations, including distinct sampling schemes, together with a widely used method based on linkage disequilibrium patterns observed in a single (one-time) population sample. We hypothesize that spatially restricted sampling might be the main putative factor behind the apparently low Ne/N estimates obtained for the large and continuously-distributed populations studied here. Because of its statistically-inherent assessment difficulty, we call for caution when interpreting marker-based estimates of contemporary Ne for monitoring widely-distributed tree populations or small genetic conservation units embedded within large continuous tree populations.
Article
Full-text available
Biodiversity underlies ecosystem resilience, ecosystem function, sustainable economies, and human well‐being. Understanding how biodiversity sustains ecosystems under anthropogenic stressors and global environmental change will require new ways of deriving and applying biodiversity data. A major challenge is that biodiversity data and knowledge are scattered, biased, collected with numerous methods, and stored in inconsistent ways. The Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) has developed the Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) as fundamental metrics to help aggregate, harmonize, and interpret biodiversity observation data from diverse sources. Mapping and analyzing EBVs can help to evaluate how aspects of biodiversity are distributed geographically and how they change over time. EBVs are also intended to serve as inputs and validation to forecast the status and trends of biodiversity, and to support policy and decision making. Here, we assess the feasibility of implementing Genetic Composition EBVs (Genetic EBVs), which are metrics of within‐species genetic variation. We review and bring together numerous areas of the field of genetics and evaluate how each contributes to global and regional genetic biodiversity monitoring with respect to theory, sampling logistics, metadata, archiving, data aggregation, modeling, and technological advances. We propose four Genetic EBVs: (i) Genetic Diversity; (ii) Genetic Differentiation; (iii) Inbreeding; and (iv) Effective Population Size (Ne). We rank Genetic EBVs according to their relevance, sensitivity to change, generalizability, scalability, feasibility and data availability. We outline the workflow for generating genetic data underlying the Genetic EBVs, and review advances and needs in archiving genetic composition data and metadata. We discuss how Genetic EBVs can be operationalized by visualizing EBVs in space and time across species and by forecasting Genetic EBVs beyond current observations using various modeling approaches. Our review then explores challenges of aggregation, standardization, and costs of operationalizing the Genetic EBVs, as well as future directions and opportunities to maximize their uptake globally in research and policy. The collection, annotation, and availability of genetic data has made major advances in the past decade, each of which contributes to the practical and standardized framework for large‐scale genetic observation reporting. Rapid advances in DNA sequencing technology present new opportunities, but also challenges for operationalizing Genetic EBVs for biodiversity monitoring regionally and globally. With these advances, genetic composition monitoring is starting to be integrated into global conservation policy, which can help support the foundation of all biodiversity and species' long‐term persistence in the face of environmental change. We conclude with a summary of concrete steps for researchers and policy makers for advancing operationalization of Genetic EBVs. The technical and analytical foundations of Genetic EBVs are well developed, and conservation practitioners should anticipate their increasing application as efforts emerge to scale up genetic biodiversity monitoring regionally and globally.
Article
Full-text available
Variation in genetic diversity across species ranges has long been recognized as highly informative for assessing populations’ resilience and adaptive potential. The spatial distribution of genetic diversity within populations, referred to as fine‐scale spatial genetic structure (FSGS), also carries information about recent demographic changes, yet it has rarely been connected to range scale processes. We studied eight silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) population pairs (sites), growing at high and low elevations, representative of the main genetic lineages of the species. A total of 1368 adult trees and 540 seedlings were genotyped using 137 and 116 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), respectively. Sites revealed a clear east‐west isolation‐by‐distance pattern consistent with the post‐glacial colonization history of the species. Genetic differentiation among sites (FCT=0.148) was an order of magnitude greater than between elevations within sites (FSC=0.031), nevertheless high elevation populations consistently exhibited a stronger FSGS. Structural equation modeling revealed that elevation and, to a lesser extent, post‐glacial colonization history, but not climatic and habitat variables, were the best predictors of FSGS across populations. These results suggest that high elevation habitats have been colonized more recently across the species range. Additionally, paternity analysis revealed a high reproductive skew among adults and a stronger FSGS in seedlings than in adults, suggesting that FSGS may conserve the signature of demographic changes for several generations. Our results emphasize that spatial patterns of genetic diversity within populations provide information about demographic history complementary to non‐spatial statistics, and could be used for genetic diversity monitoring, especially in forest trees.
Article
Full-text available
Global conservation policy and action have largely neglected protecting and monitoring genetic diversity—one of the three main pillars of biodiversity. Genetic diversity (diversity within species) underlies species’ adaptation and survival, ecosystem resilience, and societal innovation. The low priority given to genetic diversity has largely been due to knowledge gaps in key areas, including the importance of genetic diversity and the trends in genetic diversity change; the perceived high expense and low availability and the scattered nature of genetic data; and complicated concepts and information that are inaccessible to policymakers. However, numerous recent advances in knowledge, technology, databases, practice, and capacity have now set the stage for better integration of genetic diversity in policy instruments and conservation efforts. We review these developments and explore how they can support improved consideration of genetic diversity in global conservation policy commitments and enable countries to monitor, report on, and take action to maintain or restore genetic diversity.
Thesis
144 ref. *INRA, Documentation, Orleans Diffusion du document : INRA, Documentation, Orleans Diplôme : Dr. d'Université
Thesis
Diffusion du document : INRA Antilles-Guyane, UMR ECOFOG, F97387 Kourou, Guyane (France) Diplôme : Dr. d'Université
Article
Few doubt that effective population size (Ne) is one of the most important parameters in evolutionary biology, but how many can say they really understand the concept? Ne is the evolutionary analogue of the number of individuals (or adults) in the population, N. Whereas ecological consequences of population size depend on N, evolutionary consequences (rates of loss of genetic diversity and increase in inbreeding; relative effectiveness of selection) depend on Ne. Formal definitions typically relate effective size to a key population genetic parameter, such as loss of heterozygosity or variance in allele frequency. However, for practical application to real populations, it is more useful to define Ne in terms of three demographic parameters: number of potential parents (adult N), and mean and variance in offspring number. Defined this way, Ne determines the rate of random genetic drift across the entire genome in the offspring generation. Other evolutionary forces (mutation, migration, selection)—together with factors such as variation in recombination rate—can also affect genetic variation, and this leads to heterogeneity across the genome in observed rates of genetic change. For some, it has been convenient to interpret this heterogeneity in terms of heterogeneity in Ne, but unfortunately this has muddled the concepts of genetic drift and effective population size. A commonly-repeated misconception is that Ne is the number of parents that actually contribute genes to the next generation (NP). In reality, NP can be smaller or larger than Ne, and the NP/Ne ratio depends on the sex ratio, the mean and variance in offspring number, and whether inbreeding or variance Ne is of interest.