ArticlePDF Available

The cell morphological diversity of Saccharomycotina yeasts

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The ∼1 200 known species in subphylum Saccharomycotina are a highly diverse clade of unicellular fungi. During its lifecycle, a typical yeast exhibits multiple cell types with various morphologies; these morphologies vary across Saccharomycotina species. Here, we synthesize the evolutionary dimensions of variation in cellular morphology of yeasts across the subphylum, focusing on variation in cell shape, cell size, type of budding, and filament production. Examination of 332 representative species across the subphylum revealed that the most common budding cell shapes are ovoid, spherical, and ellipsoidal, and that their average length and width is 5.6 μm and 3.6 μm, respectively. 58.4% of yeast species examined can produce filamentous cells, and 87.3% of species reproduce asexually by multilateral budding, which does not require utilization of cell polarity for mitosis. Interestingly, ∼1.8% of species examined have not been observed to produce budding cells, but rather only produce filaments of septate hyphae and/or pseudohyphae. 76.9% of yeast species examined have sexual cycle descriptions, with most producing one to four ascospores that are most commonly hat-shaped (37.4%). Systematic description of yeast cellular morphological diversity and reconstruction of its evolution promises to enrich our understanding of the evolutionary cell biology of this major fungal lineage.
Variation in budding yeast cell size and shape in the subphylum Saccharomycotina . (A) For comparison, the cell shape and length of the model bacterium Esc heric hia coli is also pr ovided (cell sha pe is bacilliform with a cell length av er a ge 1-2 μm). Starmerella bombicola (order Dipodascales ) budding cell shape is ovoid or elongate with a cell size av er a ge of 3 × 1.5 μm. Kazac hstania transv aalensis (order Sacc harom ycetales ) budding cell shape is allantoid, apiculate , o void, or ellipsoidal with a cell size av er a ge of 5.25 × 4.25 μm. Trigonopsis variabilis (order Trigonopsidales ) budding cell shape is spherical or triangular with a cell size av er a ge of 4.45 × 4 μm. Candida albicans (order Serinales ) budding cell shape is spherical or ovoid with a cell size av er a ge of 6 × 4.75 μm. Sacc harom yces cerevisiae (order Sacc harom ycetales ) budding cell shape is spherical or ovoid with a cell size av er a ge of 7.5 × 5.5 μm. Candida gotoi (order Serinales ) budding cell shape is spherical, ovoid, or elongate with a cell size av er a ge of 5.25 × 5 μm, and can produce hyphae that has an av er a ge size of 12 × 2.5 μm. Clavispora opuntiae (order Serinales ) budding cell shape is spherical with cell size av er a ge of 9.5 × 3.5 μm. Hanseniaspora osmophila (order Sacc harom ycodales ) budding cell sha pe is a piculate with cell size av er a ge of 12.7 × 4.75 μm. Candida dubliniensis (order Serinales ) budding cell shape is apiculate with a cell size average of 7 × 4.9 μm and produces hyphae as large as 22 μm in length. Eremothecium sinecaudum (order Sacc harom ycetales ) budding cell shape is cylindrical with a cell size average of 16 × 4.5 μm. (B) (i) Ovoid and elongate budding cells of Starmerella bombicola . (ii) Ellipsoidal budding cells of Kazachstania transvaalensis . (iii) Triangular budding cells exhibited by Trigonopsis variabilis . (iv) Spherical budding cells exhibited by Candida albicans . (v) Spherical budding cells exhibited by Sacc harom yces cerevisiae . (vi) True hyphae exhibited by Candida gotoi . (vii) Spherical budding cells exhibited by Clavispora opuntiae. (viii) Apiculate bipolar budding cell exhibited by Hanseniaspora osmophila . (ix) True hyphae exhibited by Candida dubliniensis . (x) Cylindrical budding cells exhibited by Eremothecium sinecaudum . Taxonomic type strains are shown, except for S. cerevisiae S288C. Images i, ii, iii, vi, vii, ix and x were taken from theyeasts.org. Yeasts in images iv , v , and viii were taken by Amanda Hulfac hor gr own at r oom temper atur e in YPD (yeast extr act, peptone, dextr ose) medium until visible gr o wth w as observed. Size bar = 5 μm.
… 
Variation in ascus and ascospore size and shape in the subphylum Sacc harom ycotina . (A) Wic kerhamom yces hampshirensis (order Phaffom ycetales ) ascospor es ar e hat-sha ped and hav e av er a ge sizes of 1.9 × 1.2 μm; asci contain 1-4 ascospor es and their av er a ge size is 6 × 4 μm. Cephaloascus fr agr ans (order Serinales ) ascospores are hat-shaped and have average sizes of 2.5 × 2.15 μm; asci contain 2-4 ascospores and their average size is 6 × 3.5 μm; ascospores and asci can be contained inside an ascophore that is stout, tapered, and can be as long as 500 μm. Lipomyces japonicus (order Lipomycetales ) ascospor e sha pe is spherical and av er a ge length is 2.75 μm; asci contain 1-4 ascospor es , ha v e saccate (or sac-like) sha pes , and ha ve an a v er a ge size of 10 × 4.5 μm. Lipomyces oligophaga (order Lipomycetales ) ascospore shape is ellipsoidal and average size of 3.25 × 1.25 μm; asci contain 4 or more ascopsor es, ar e saccate shaped, and have an av er a ge size of 16.3 × 7.3 μm. Alloascoidea africana (order Alloascoideales ) ascospore cell shape is ellipsoidal and its av er a ge size is 4.5 × 3.25 μm; asci contains 16-70 ascospor es, ar e ellipsoidal shaped, and their av er a ge size is 30 × 11 μm. Ambrosiozyma monospora (order Pichiales ) ascospore cell shape is hat-shaped and average size of 7 × 3.5 μm; asci contain 1-2 ascopsores, and are spherical or ovoid in sha pe. Pac hysolen tannophilus (order Alaninales ) ascospore cell shape is spherical; asci contain up to 4 ascospores; ascospores and asci can be contained inside an ascophore that is curved, tube-shaped, and can be as long as 60 μm. Metschnikowia hawaiiensis (order Serinales ) ascospore cell shape is acicular and av er a ge cell length of 160 μm; asci contain 2 ascospor es, ar e wide and tube-shaped, and can be as long as 200 μm. (B) (i) Hat-shaped ascospores exhibited by Wickerhamomyces hampshirensis . (ii) Spherical ascospores exhibited by Lipomyces japonicus . (iii) Ellipsoidal ascospores exhibited by Lipomyces oligophaga . (iv) Ellipsoidal ascospores inside a large ascus exhibited by Alloascoidea africana . (v) Hat-shaped ascospores exhibited by Ambrosiozyma monospora . (vi) Spherical ascospores inside an ascus and tube-shaped ascophore exhibited by Pachysolen tannophilus . (vii) Acicular ascospore exhibited by Me. hawaiiensis . Taxonomic type strains are shown. Images i, ii, iii, v, and vii were taken from theyeasts.org, and image vi was ada pted fr om (Kurtzman et al. 2011 ). Ima ge iv was ada pted fr om (Kurtzman and Robnett 2013 ). Size bar = 5 μm.
… 
Content may be subject to copyright.
FEMS Yea st Resear c h , 2024, 24 , 1–9
DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/foad055
Ad v ance access publication date: 23 December 2023
Minire vie w
The cell morphological di v ersity of Saccharomycotina
yeasts
Christina M. Chavez
1 ,2
, Marizeth Gr oenew ald
3
, Amanda B. Hulfachor
4
, Gideon Kpurubu
1 ,2
, Rene Huerta
1 ,2
, Chris Tod d Hittinger
4
,
Antonis Rokas
1 ,2 ,*
1
Department of Biological Sciences, Va nde rbi lt University, Nashville, TN 37235, United States
2
Evolutionary Studies Initiative, Vanderb ilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
3
Wes terdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht 3584, the Netherlands
4
Labor atory of Genetics, DOE Gr eat Lakes Bioener gy Researc h Center, Wisconsin Ener gy Institute , Center for Genomic Science Inno v ation, J. F. Cr ow Institute for the
Study of Evolution, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53726, United States
Corresponding author. Department of Biological Sciences and Evolutionary Studies Initiative, Vander bil t University, VU Station B#35-1634, Nashville, TN 37235,
USA. E-mail: antonis.r okas@v anderbilt.edu
Editor: [Daniela Delneri]
Abstract
The 1 200 known species in subphylum Sacchar om ycotina are a highly diverse clade of unicellular fungi. During its lifecycle, a typical
yeast exhibits multiple cell types with various morphologies; these morphologies v ar y acr oss Sacchar om ycotina species. Here , w e syn-
thesize the ev olutionar y dimensions of variation in cellular morphology of yeasts across the subphylum, focusing on variation in cell
shape , cell size , type of budding, and lament pr oduction. Examination of 332 r e pr esentati v e species acr oss the subphylum r ev ealed
that the most common budding cell shapes are ovoid, spherical, and ellipsoidal, and that their av era ge length and width is 5.6 μm
and 3.6 μm, r especti v el y. 58.4% of yeast species examined can produce lamentous cells, and 87.3% of species r e pr oduce asexuall y by
multilater al budding, whic h does not r equir e utilization of cell polarity for mitosis. Inter estingl y, 1.8% of species examined have not
been observed to produce budding cells, but rather only produce laments of septate hyphae and/or pseudohyphae. 76.9% of yeast
species examined have sexual cycle descriptions, with most producing one to four ascospores that are most commonly hat-shaped
(37.4%). Systematic description of yeast cellular morphological di v ersity and reconstruction of its evolution promises to enrich our
understanding of the ev olutionar y cell biology of this major fungal lineage.
Ke yw ords: ev olutionar y cell biology; cell size; cell shape; budding; h yphae; pseudoh yphae; cell type; Sacchar om ycotina
Introduction
Yeasts are unicellular fungi and hav e e volv ed m ultiple times in-
dependentl y acr oss the fungal kingdom (Na gy et al. 2014 , Li et al.
2021 ). Yea st s are free-living organisms that inhabit diverse ter-
restrial, aquatic, and marine environments on every continent,
forming associations with many plant, fungal, and insect species
(Kurtzman et al. 2011 ). The most species-rich lineage of yeasts is
that of the 1200 species in the subphylum Sacc harom ycotina (phy-
lum Ascom ycota ), whic h we will her eafter r efer to as yeasts. Yeast
species display a wide diversity of ecological lifestyles (Opulente
et al. 2018 ), partaking in m utualistic, competitiv e, opportunis-
tic , parasitic , or pathogenic relationships with other organisms
(Kurtzman et al. 2011 ). Se v er al yeast species ar e of importance to
diverse industries and human affairs, such as the baker’s yeast
Sacc harom yces cerevisiae (baking, br e wing, wine-making, biotec h-
nology); the human pathogens Candida albicans , Candida auris ,
and Nakaseomyces glabratus ( syn. Candida glabrata) ; and the plant
pathogens in the genus Eremothecium.
Yea st species in the Sacc harom ycotina can pr opa gate both
thr ough mainl y mitosis and often meiosis, gener ating differ ent
cell types (Herskowitz 1988 , Fischer et al. 2021 ). We refer to this
type of cellular mor phological v ariation as de v elopmental v aria-
tion. De v elopmental v ariation of cellular mor phology can be ob-
served in cell type differentiation that occurs during a yeast life
c ycle, as w ell as at various phases of cell cycle pr ogr ession in mito-
sis and meiosis of either haploid or diploid cells (Fig. 1 ). Yeasts un-
dergo cellular division and reproduction through mechanisms of
division, germination, and lamentous growth to result in various
cell types, such as budding cells, ascospores, and (pseudo)hyphae,
in which cells utilize polarization for successful growth (Bi and
Park 2012 ).
The de v elopmental v ariation exhibited b y y east species is often
dependent on en vironmental conditions , such as nutrient avail-
ability and temper atur e . For example , certain species primarily
grow as unicellular cells, but they can switch to a multicellu-
lar state through lamentous growth under the inuence of spe-
cic envir onmental str essors (Ruiz-Herr er a and Sentandr eu 2002 ,
Cullen and Spr a gue 2012 , Rupert and Rusc he 2022 ). Mitosis of ha p-
loid or diploid daughter cells enables yeasts to continue budding
and replicating so long as nutrients continue to be a vailable . Some
species of Sacc harom ycotina can under go mitosis to r esult in la-
mentous growth through the production of hyphae and pseudohy-
phae. Budding and pseudohyphae cells undergo polarized growth
during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, while hyphal growth does
Recei v ed 7 Mar c h 2023; revised 4 November 2023; accepted 22 December 2023
©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford Uni v ersity Pr ess on behalf of FEMS. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Cr eati v e
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc- nd/4.0/ ), which permits non-commercial r e pr oduction
and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For
commer cial re-use , please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsyr/article/doi/10.1093/femsyr/foad055/7492805 by guest on 23 January 2024
2 | FEMS Yea st Resear c h , 2024, Vol. 24
F igure 1. Generalized life c ycle of y east species in the subphylum Sacc har om ycotina. (1) Bud ding, including unipolar, bipolar, and m ultilater al budding
types. Note that the shapes and sizes of budding cells vary across species (see Fig. 2 ). (2) Haploid mitosis (dark blue = type a haploid, light blue = type
αha ploid). (3) Ha ploid mating of opposite types, possibl y after mating-type switc hing (Kr assowski et al. 2019 ). (4) Diploid mitosis (green = diploid a/ α).
(5) Diploid meiosis (purple = ascus with four ascospores). Note that the shapes and sizes of asci and ascospores vary across species (see Fig. 3 ). (6)
Filamentous growth as a result of an environmental change, such as a temperature increase and/or nutrient limitation (orange = pseudohyphae,
y ello w = true hy phae). Note that the known life cycles of se v er al species in the subphylum differ from this generalized version (e.g. several species are
not known to have a sexual stage).
not occur during the cell cycle, and instead depends on contin-
uous polarized growth without cell separation (Diepeveen et al.
2017 ).
In addition to de v elopmental v ariation, yeasts exhibit e volu-
tionary variation (Kurtzman et al. 2011 ). Evolutionary variation of
cellular morphology is characterized by the different morpholo-
gies of the same cell type across yeast species (Fig. 2 ). Population-
le v el v ariation in cellular morphology between individual cells
within a species has also been observed (Skelly et al. 2013 , Yvert
et al. 2013 , Jung et al. 2016 ). Although it is well known that dif-
ferent species and clades (e.g. taxonomic orders) exhibit distinct
morphologies and that the genomes of yeasts are fast-evolving
and highl y div erse (Shen et al. 2018 , 2020 , Gr oene wald et al. 2023 )
(e.g. at the le v el of pr otein sequence div er gence, S. cerevisiae is as
distantl y r elated to C. albicans as humans are to sponges), whether
this genomic variation is associated with cellular morphological
v ariation r emains poorl y understood.
Species in the Sacc harom ycotina exhibit extensiv e de v elopmen-
tal (Fig. 1 ) and evolutionary (Figs 2 4 ) variation in their cell sizes
and shapes. Examination of cellular phenotypes across yeast
species and orders r e v eals div erse mor phologies that ar e atypical
of or absent from S. cerevisiae , the premier model organism not
just for yeasts, but for unicellular eukaryotes in general. This
e volutionary v ariation in cell sha pe and size may stem fr om
stochasticity in the form of genetic and envir onmental v ariance
(i.e. growth conditions) (Lynch et al. 2014 ). T hus , full understand-
ing of the evolutionary variation of cellular morphology requires
also examining genomic v ariation, v ariation in gene/protein
networks, and variation in environmental conditions involved in
its determination.
Although the Sacc harom ycotina subphylum harbors abundant
e volutionary v ariation of cell sha pes and sizes that allows for phy-
logenetic comparison across both closely related and highly diver-
gent taxa, this diversity of cell morphology has not been system-
aticall y c har acterized. This r e vie w aims to ll this ga p by synthe-
sizing the phenotypic diversity of cell morphology of evolutionary
variation of yeasts across the subphylum.
Dening v aria tion in yeast cell morphology
Ther e ar e se v er al attributes of the cellular mor phology of yeasts
that vary between species and can be measured across one or
more cell types, including cell shape, cell size, budding type, and
lament production. Individual cell types of each yeast species
typically exhibit one or more distinct shapes (e .g. o void, spherical,
apiculate , and bacilliform). T he cells of different species also differ
in their sizes, whic h ar e described by measuring their length and
width. Cell size av er a ges ar e determined by av er a ging the smallest
and largest lengths and widths recorded.
Yeast species also vary with respect to budding type. In optimal
growth conditions, some species divide during mitosis by budding
at one of the poles of the cell at a time, which is termed unipo-
lar budding. Other species can bud from both poles of the cell,
which is termed bipolar budding. In some species, cell division by
budding can also occur without the use of the poles (i.e. budding
can occur at an y r egion of the cell), which is termed non-polar
or m ultilater al budding. Some species can grow continuously in
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsyr/article/doi/10.1093/femsyr/foad055/7492805 by guest on 23 January 2024
Chavez et al. | 3
(A)
(B)
Figure 2.
Var iat ion in budding yeast cell size and shape in the subphylum Saccharomycotina . (A) For comparison, the cell shape and length of the model
bacterium Esc heric hia coli is also pr ovided (cell sha pe is bacilliform with a cell length av er a ge 1–2 μm). Starmerella bombicola (order Dipodascales ) budding
cell shape is ovoid or elongate with a cell size av er a ge of 3 ×1.5 μm. Kazac hstania transv aalensis (order Sacc harom ycetales ) budding cell shape is allantoid,
apiculate , o void, or ellipsoidal with a cell size av er a ge of 5.25 ×4.25 μm. Trigonopsis variabilis (order Trigonopsidales ) budding cell shape is spherical or
triangular with a cell size av er a ge of 4.45 ×4 μm. Candida albicans (order Serinales ) budding cell shape is spherical or ovoid with a cell size av er a ge of
6 ×4.75 μm. Sacc harom yces cerevisiae (order Sacc harom ycetales ) budding cell shape is spherical or ovoid with a cell size av er a ge of 7.5 ×5.5 μm. Candida
gotoi (order Serinales ) budding cell shape is spherical, ovoid, or elongate with a cell size av er a ge of 5.25 ×5 μm, and can produce hyphae that has an
av er a ge size of 12 ×2.5 μm. Clavispora opuntiae (order Serinales ) budding cell shape is spherical with cell size av er a ge of 9.5 ×3.5 μm. Hanseniaspora
osmophila (order Sacc harom ycodales ) budding cell sha pe is a piculate with cell size av er a ge of 12.7 ×4.75 μm. Candida dubliniensis (order Serinales ) budding
cell shape is apiculate with a cell size average of 7 ×4.9 μm and produces hyphae as large as 22 μm in length. Eremothecium sinecaudum (order
Sacc harom ycetales ) budding cell shape is cylindrical with a cell size average of 16 ×4.5 μm. (B) (i) Ovoid and elongate budding cells of Starmerella
bombicola . (ii) Ellipsoidal budding cells of Kazachstania transvaalensis . (iii) Triangular budding cells exhibited by Trigonopsis variabilis . (iv) Spherical
budding cells exhibited by Candida albicans . (v) Spherical budding cells exhibited by Sacc harom yces cerevisiae . (vi) Tr ue hyphae exhibited by Candida gotoi .
(vii) Spherical budding cells exhibited by Clavispora opuntiae. (viii) Apiculate bipolar budding cell exhibited by Hanseniaspora osmophila . (ix) True hyphae
exhibited by Candida dubliniensis . (x) Cylindrical budding cells exhibited by Eremothecium sinecaudum . Taxonomic type strains are shown, except for S.
cerevisiae S288C. Images i, ii, iii, vi, vii, ix and x were taken from theyeasts.org. Yea st s in images iv , v , and viii were taken by Amanda Hulfac hor gr own at
r oom temper atur e in YPD (yeast extr act, peptone, dextr ose) medium until visible gr o wth w as observed. Size bar = 5 μm.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsyr/article/doi/10.1093/femsyr/foad055/7492805 by guest on 23 January 2024
4 | FEMS Yea st Resear c h , 2024, Vol. 24
(A)
(B)
Figure 3.
Var iat ion in ascus and ascospore size and shape in the subphylum Sacc harom ycotina . (A) Wic kerhamom yces hampshirensis (order Phaffom ycetales )
ascospor es ar e hat-sha ped and hav e av er a ge sizes of 1.9 ×1.2 μm; asci contain 1–4 ascospor es and their av er a ge size is 6 ×4 μm. Cephaloascus fr agr ans
(order Serinales ) ascospores are hat-shaped and have average sizes of 2.5 ×2.15 μm; asci contain 2–4 ascospores and their average size is 6 ×3.5 μm;
ascospores and asci can be contained inside an ascophore that is stout, tapered, and can be as long as 500 μm. Lipomyces japonicus (order Lipomycetales )
ascospor e sha pe is spherical and av er a ge length is 2.75 μm; asci contain 1–4 ascospor es , ha v e saccate (or sac-like) sha pes , and ha ve an a v er a ge size of
10 ×4.5 μm. Lipomyces oligophaga (order Lipomycetales ) ascospore shape is ellipsoidal and average size of 3.25 ×1.25 μm; asci contain 4 or more
ascopsor es, ar e saccate shaped, and have an av er a ge size of 16.3 ×7.3 μm. Alloascoidea africana (order Alloascoideales ) ascospore cell shape is ellipsoidal
and its av er a ge size is 4.5 ×3.25 μm; asci contains 16–70 ascospor es, ar e ellipsoidal shaped, and their av er a ge size is 30 ×11 μm. Ambrosiozyma
monospora (order Pichiales ) ascospore cell shape is hat-shaped and average size of 7 ×3.5 μm; asci contain 1–2 ascopsores, and are spherical or ovoid in
sha pe. Pac hysolen tannophilus (order Alaninales ) ascospore cell shape is spherical; asci contain up to 4 ascospores; ascospores and asci can be contained
inside an ascophore that is curved, tube-shaped, and can be as long as 60 μm. Metschnikowia hawaiiensis (order Serinales ) ascospore cell shape is
acicular and av er a ge cell length of 160 μm; asci contain 2 ascospor es, ar e wide and tube-shaped, and can be as long as 200 μm. (B) (i) Hat-shaped
ascospores exhibited by Wickerhamomyces hampshirensis . (ii) Spherical ascospores exhibited by Lipomyces japonicus . (iii) Ellipsoidal ascospores exhibited
by Lipomyces oligophaga . (iv) Ellipsoidal ascospores inside a large ascus exhibited by Alloascoidea africana . (v) Hat-shaped ascospores exhibited by
Ambrosiozyma monospora . (vi) Spherical ascospores inside an ascus and tube-shaped ascophore exhibited by Pachysolen tannophilus . (vii) Acicular
ascospore exhibited by Me. hawaiiensis . Taxonomic type strains are shown. Images i, ii, iii, v, and vii were taken from theyeasts.org, and image vi was
ada pted fr om (Kurtzman et al. 2011 ). Ima ge iv was ada pted fr om (Kurtzman and Robnett 2013 ). Size bar = 5 μm.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsyr/article/doi/10.1093/femsyr/foad055/7492805 by guest on 23 January 2024
Chavez et al. | 5
Figure 4. Cell morphology trait distributions within the subphylum Saccharomycotina . Phylogeny of 332 re presentati ve species of yeasts in the
subphylum Sacc harom ycotina. The phylogen y is from the study by Shen et al. ( 2018 ). The br anc h colors of the phylogeny correspond to the subphylum’s
12 taxonomic orders (Gr oene wald et al. 2023 ). Circles around the phylogeny display variation in select cell morphology traits. From inner to outer
circle: cell length av er a ge (y ello w to blue gr adient); cell sha pe including spherical (pur ple), ovoid (or ange), both spherical and ovoid (gr een), other sha pe
(blue), four or more shape states (red), or absent (white); budding type including unipolar (orange), bipolar (green), multilateral (purple), bipolar and
ssion (blue), ssion (red), or absent (white); lament type including pseudohyphae (blue), true hyphae (orange), both pseudohyphae and true hyphae
(r ed), absent (blac k), or unknown (white); ascus shape including club-shaped (orange), other shape (purple), both club-shaped and other (green), or
absent (white); ascospore shape including spherical (purple), hat-shaped (green), both spherical and hat-shaped (blue), other shape (red), or absent
(white); ascospore number including 1 to 2 (purple), 3 to 4 (orange), 5 to 100 (green), 101 to 200 (blue), 201 to 400 (red), or absent (white). The trait data
values used for the generation of this gure are provided in Ta bl e S1A .
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsyr/article/doi/10.1093/femsyr/foad055/7492805 by guest on 23 January 2024
6 | FEMS Yea st Resear c h , 2024, Vol. 24
the form of laments, which are termed pseudohyphae or true
h yphae. Pseudoh yphae are characterized by the presence of la-
ments composed of chains or clusters of budding cells, while true
hyphae are the result of continuous polarized growth that gener-
ates laments of discrete cells separated by septa (Kurtzman et al.
2011 ).
Ther e ar e a fe w cav eats that ar e important to note regard-
ing the cell morphology of Saccharomycotina species . T he cell mor-
phologies display ed b y y east species can vary b y strain, b y ploidy,
and be inuenced b y gro wth conditions and cell age. For exam-
ple, differ ent cultur e media can induce slight variations in yeast
cell morphologies; formation of pseudohyphae is prominent in
media such as Dalmau plate culture on corn meal agar, but the
same species will have reduced formation of pseudohyphae in
other media such as glucose-yeast extract-peptone (Kurtzman et
al. 2011 ). Tim e of incubation during cell culture can also have
an inuence on cell size, with higher incubation times leading to
larger cell sizes. Cell cycle stage and phase of growth (e.g. lag vs.
stationary phase) can also inuence cell morphology. During the
beginning stages of the cell cycle, a daughter cell is growing and
ther efor e incr easing in size, wher eas at the end of the cell cycle
the parent cell partakes in cellular quiescence in which replica-
tion and growth no longer occur (Sun and Gresham 2021 ). For the
descriptions of cell size av er a ges included in this r e vie w, most of
the measurements were performed after three to ve days of cul-
ture of the taxonomic type strain of each species.
Yea st cells can also undergo meiosis to form and release sex-
ual spores known as ascospores. Although yeast species typically
have both asexual (anamorphic) and sexual (teleomorphic) stages
(Kurtzman et al. 2011 ), a consider able fr action of species are not
known to have a sexual sta ge; for example, se v er al species in the
genera Starmerella of order Dipodascales and Yamadazyma of order
Serinales are not known to produce sexual spores (or ascospores).
To synthesize available information on the variation of cell
morphology of yeasts in the Sacc harom ycotina subphylum, we r e-
trie v ed av ailable data fr om taxonomic descriptions of individual
species from The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study (Kurtzman et al. 2011 )
and from The Yeasts website ( https:// theyeasts.org/ ), which is the
successor to The Ye as ts : A Taxonomic Study book series. Data were
r etrie v ed for 332 species r ecentl y compiled by the Y1000 + Project
( http:// y1000plus.org/ ) (Hittinger et al. 2015 , Shen et al. 2018 ).
Interspecies v aria tion of cellular morphology
Variat io n in asexual cell shape
Yeast species vary in cell shape within and betw een or ders. Well-
kno wn y easts, such as S. cerevisiae and C. albicans , produce spheri-
cal and ovoid budding cells, while Hanseniaspora uvarum , a species
important to wine pr oduction, pr oduces a piculate sha ped cells.
Examination of a r epr esentativ e set of 332 yeast species (Shen
et al. 2018 ) sho w ed that most budding cells ha ve o void (63.8%
of species or 212/332), spherical (59% or 196/332), and ellipsoidal
(50.6% or 168/332) shapes (note that the numbers do not add up
to 332 because some species exhibit two or more cell shapes). Less
common shapes include elongate (19.6% or 65/332), cylindrical
(19.5% or 65/332), apiculate (3.6% or 12/332), fusiform (1.5% or
5/332), and bacilliform (1.2% or 4/332). Other less common cell
shapes that occur in two to four species include clavate ( Can-
dida orba of order Phaffomycetales , Alloascoidea hylecoeti of order Al-
loascoideales , Cephaloascus albidus and Cephaloascus fr agr ans of or-
der Serinales ), ogival ( Brettanomyces anomalus, Brettanomyces brux-
ellensis, and Brettanomyces custersianus in order Pichiales ), and ac-
uleate ( Candida tammaniensis and Aciculoconidium aculeatum , both
in order Serinales ). Shapes that occur in only one species in our
dataset include triangular ( Trigonopsis variabilis in order Trigonop-
sidales ), r ectangular ( Saproc haete clav ata in order Dipodascales ),
curv ed ( Sporopac h ydermia quercuum in or der Sporopach ydermiales ),
lunate ( Candida golubevii in order Serinales ), and “bowling-pin”
sha ped ( Wic kerhamia uorescens in order Serinales ).
Examination of the distribution of cell shapes across the phy-
logeny of Saccharomycotina suggests that evolutionary relatedness
is not always a good proxy for similarity of cell shape and that
less common cell sha pes ar e spr ead acr oss the phylogen y (Fig. 4
and Table S1 ). For example, the curv ed-sha ped species Sp. quer-
cuum and the bacilliform-shaped species Sporopachydermia lacta-
tivora ar e closel y r elated, wher eas the distantl y r elated Al. hyle-
coeti and Ce. albidus species are both clavate shaped. Similarly,
organisms with cylindrical cell shapes are spread across differ-
ent orders, such as Teunomyces kruisii (order Serinales ) , Eremothe-
cium sinecaudum (order Sacc harom ycetales ) , and Candida boidinii (or-
der Pichiales ); ellipsoidal shaped cells are produced by Kazachsta-
nia aerobia (order Sacc harom ycetales ) and Zygoascus meyerae (order
Dipodascales ); and ta per ed cells ar e pr oduced by Sacc harom ycopsis
malanga (order Ascoideales ) and Wic kerhamom yces hampshirensis (or-
der Phaffomycetales ).
Budding cell shape typically varies between species, but there
is also variation within species. Almost all yeast species exhibit
more than one type of budding cell shape (95.8% or 318/332). For
example, budding cells of Suhomyces canberraensis, of order Seri-
nales , ar e gener all y spherical, but some cells are cylindrical, el-
lipsoidal, or elongate. Species that exhibit four or more different
bud ding shapes mak e up 7.5% of our dataset and are found in
the orders Pichiales , Serinales , Alaninales , Phaffomycetales , Dipodas-
cales , Sacc harom ycetales , and Sacc harom ycodales (Fig. 4 and Table S1 ).
In some cases, this within species variation is conserved between
species; budding cells of the sister taxa Ce. albidus and Ce. fr agr ans
(order Serinales ) can be ovoid, ellipsoidal, or cla vate . Howe v er, other
taxa exhibit a gr eater degr ee of conservation in their cell shape.
For example, the ten species from the genus Debaryomyces (order
Serinales ) included in our dataset exhibit low le v els of cell sha pe
variation since all have mostly spherical and ovoid budding cells.
Similarly, all Hanseniaspora species (order Saccharomycodales ) in our
dataset generate elongated and apiculate shaped cells, likely due
to their specialized budding type (see “Budding type variation”).
Variat io n in sexual cell shape
During sexual r epr oduction, ascomycetous yeast species typically
undergo meiosis to generate ascospores that are enclosed within
an ascus before release for fungal germination (Greig 2009 ). Of
the 332 yeasts examined, 76.9% (230/332) have sexual cycle de-
scriptions; this is likely an underestimate since examination of
their genomes has r e v ealed that 330 of the 332 species exam-
ined contain a mating type locus (Krassowski et al. 2019 ). The 230
yeast species with a known sexual cycle vary in the shape of as-
cospores and asci, as well as in the number of ascospores that
each ascus contains (Figs 3 and 4 ). For example, a few species
including Al. hylecoeti (order Alloascoideales ) and Vanderwaltozyma
polyspora (order Saccharomycetales ) can produce large numbers of
ascospor es ( 150–400 ascospor es per ascus in the case of Al.
hylecoeti ), while most other species, such as those within the
gener a Debaryom yces , Hanseniaspora, Kazac hstania, Kluyverom yces,
Lac hancea, Priceom yces, Sacc harom yces , and Torulaspora , pr oduce onl y
one to four ascospores during meiosis . T he a v er a ge number of as-
cospor es pr oduced by species in our dataset is thr ee.
Ascospor es r ange in sha pe and can be spherical, ellipsoidal,
hat-sha ped, Saturn-sha ped, acicular, and aculeate or needle-
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsyr/article/doi/10.1093/femsyr/foad055/7492805 by guest on 23 January 2024
Chavez et al. | 7
sha ped. Hat-sha ped ascospor es occur in 37.4% of species with
a known sexual cycle in our dataset, including in some Ambro-
siozyma (order Pichiales ) , Barnettozyma (order Phaffomycetales ) , and
Hanseniaspora species (order Sacc harom ycodales ), as well as in Bab-
jeviella inositovora (order Serinales ). About 17% of species in our
dataset have spherical ascospores (e.g. Kazachstania species in
order Sacc harom ycetales , Citerom yces matritensis in order Pic hiales,
Starmerella bombicola in order Dipodascales , and se v er al Hanseni-
aspora species in order Sacc harom ycodales ). Debaryom yces species
(order Serinales ) contain spherical ascospores that have a warty
wall phenotype, although species, such as Debaryomyces subglobo-
sus , hav e ascospor es that contain a gear-like structur e. Lipom yces
species (order Lipomycetales ) tend to have uncommon ascospore
sha pes, suc h as cymbiform, which is a shape that appears to be
specic to this genus.
Ther e a ppears to be gr eater v ariation of budding cell shapes
than ascospore shapes within genera or orders. For example,
Metschnikowia species (order Serinales ) exhibit a diversity of bud-
ding cells (e .g. spherical, o void, elongate , ellipsoidal, and cylindri-
cal), but most species produce acicular shaped ascospores . T he
same is true for Eremothecium species (order Sacc harom ycetales ),
whic h ar e known to pr oduce spherical, o void, elongate , ellipsoidal,
and cylindrical budding cells, but their ascospores tend to be elon-
gated and acicular shaped.
Variat io n in asexual cell size
The cell size of the budding cells of different yeast species can
v ary fr om 2.5 ×1 μm in Tort ispora starmeri (order Trigonopsidales )
to as large as 28 ×7 μm in Br. bruxellensis (order Pichiales ) and
Candida tropicalis (order Serinales ) (Fig. 2 ). Ov er all, yeast species
produce budding cells that av er a ge 5.6 μm ×3.6 μm (av er a ge
cell length and width of 332 yeast species across Saccharomy-
cotina ). Ther e ar e species of yeast that hav e lar ge budding cells,
suc h as Nakaseom yces bracarensis (14 ×13.9 μm; order Sacc ha-
romycetales ), and Kurtzmaniella cleridarum (15.8 ×11.1 μm; or-
der Serinales ). Budding cells whose maximum length is larger
than 20 μm occur in species across the orders Serinales , Dipodas-
cales , and Pichiales , including the species Candida parapsilosis (20 ×
8 μm; order Serinales ) , Magnusiomyces tetrasperma (20 ×9 μm; or-
der Dipodascales ) , Kuraishia capsulata (20 ×4 μm; order Pichiales ),
Br. anomalus (22 ×5.5 μm; order Pichiales ) , and Blastobotrys musci-
cola (22 ×2.5 μm; order Dipodascales ) . Species with small budding
cells also occur across the yeast phylogeny. Examples include De-
baryomyces prosopidis (2 ×2.25 μm; order Serinales ) , Ogataea minuta
(2 ×1.8 μm) and Ogataea nonfermentans (2 ×1.8 μm) from order
Pic hiales , and Wic kerhamiella cacticola (2.5 ×1.5 μm), and Zygoascus
ofunaensis (2.05 ×3.45 μm) from order Dipodascales .
The relationship between budding cell size and evolutionary di-
v er gence is unknown, but it appears that similarly sized cells are
mor e likel y to be observ ed between closel y r elated species than
between distantl y r elated ones . For example , budding cells that
are 6 μm length on average (cell width average ranges from 2.5—
5 μm) ar e observ ed in species within the orders Serinales, Trigonop-
sidales , Pichiales , and Saccharomycetales . Ho w ever, average cell size
can sometimes vary considerably between closely related species;
for example, Kazachstania bromeliacearum , Kazachstania kunashiren-
sis, and Kazachstania martiniae (all in order Sacc harom ycetales ) hav e
budding cells that are 3 ×2.5, 5 ×4, and 7.5 ×2.5 μm wide, re-
spectiv el y.
Variat io n in sexual cell size
Asci and ascospor es ar e also highly variable in their sizes
(Fig. 3 ). In some yeast species, a larger ascus can contain
lar ger ascospor es . For example , Metsc hnikowia haw aiiensis and
Metschnikowia bicuspidata (both in order Serinales ) produce large
asci that have a maximum length of 200 μm and 60 μm, re-
spectiv el y, and also contain large ascospores that have a maxi-
mum length of 180 μm long and 50 μm, respectively. Metschnikowia
species contain highly varied asci sizes, but the number of as-
cospor es is conserv ed to one to two per ascus in the genus. In
other cases, a yeast species can generate higher numbers of small
ascospores within a large ascus. For example, Al. hylecoeti (order
Alloascoideales ) and Ascoidea rubescens (order Ascoideales ) produce
asci that can be at maximum as large as 400 μm ×24 μm or 150
×30 μm, r espectiv el y, with ascospor es that ar e 3.2 μm ×2 μm
or 10 ×9 μm, r espectiv el y, suc h that each ascus can produce as
many as 400 ascospores or 150 ascospores, respectively. Ce. fra-
grans (order Serinales ) produces asci that are at maximum 7 μm ×
3 μm and ascospores of 3 μm ×2 μm, making it one of the yeast
species with the smallest asci and ascospores.
Variat io n in budding type
Yea st s can divide by budding in the following ways: utilizing one
cell pole (side), or unipolar; utilizing both cell poles, or bipolar;
and without r el ying on cell polarity, or m ultilater al (Fig. 1 ). Most
species r epr oduce by m ultilater al budding (87.3% of species or
290/332); bipolar yeasts make up 3.9% (13/332), unipolar yeasts
4.5% (15/332), one species that onl y r epr oduces by ssion ( Magnu-
siomyces tetrasperma of order Dipodascales ) and two yeasts that re-
produce by both ssion and bipolar budding ( Nadsonia fulvescens
var. fulvescens and Nadsonia fulvescens var elongata of order Dipo-
dascales ). As discussed pr e viousl y, ther e ar e six species that hav e
not been observed to produce budding cells, and there are 12
species that do not have budding cell information in Kurtzman
et al. ( 2011 ). Unipolar budding is spr ead acr oss the phylogen y of
Sacc harom ycotina yeasts and is found in small numbers of species
within orders Sacc harom ycetales , Serinales , Pichiales , and Dipodas-
cales , whereas bipolar budding is highly conserved in the order
Sacc harom ycodales (Fig. 4 and Table S1 ). Multilateral budding is
also typically conserved, including in all species within the orders
Alaninales , Lipomycetales , Phaffomycetales , and Dipodascales .
Variat io n in lament production
Many yeast species can grow laments in the form of pseudo-
hyphae or true hyphae; sometimes these occur during growth
under stressful conditions (e.g. nutrient limitation, high temper-
ature), but this is not always the case. Not e v ery yeast species
has been observed to generate pseudohyphae or true hyphae; ap-
pr oximatel y 36.7% (131/332) of species are not known to produce
hyphae (Fig. 3 ). Filament morphological diversity is high among
those species that can produce laments, ranging from poorly
de v eloped pseudohyphae (rudimentary and poorly developed) to
highl y br anc hed true hyphae (highl y br anc hed septate). For ex-
ample, 12 species in the genus Kazachstania do not produce hy-
phae or pseudohyphae, while six other species do. Similarly, of the
species included in our dataset, most Barnettozyma species (order
Phaffomycetales ) do not produce laments, except for Barnettozyma
hawaiiensis and Barnettozyma populi, while most Ambrosiozyma (or-
der Pichiales ) and Hanseniaspora (order Saccharomycodales ) species
generate hyphae, except for Ambrosiozyma kashinagicola, Ambro-
siozyma pseudov ander kliftii, Hanseniaspora pseudoguilliermondii , and
Hanseniaspora vineae .
Filament production can vary drastically within orders, even
between closel y r elated species . For example , in the order Seri-
nales , Me. haw aiiensis can pr oduce true hyphae with dark septa,
Metschnikowia cerradonensis produces abundant pseudohyphae,
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsyr/article/doi/10.1093/femsyr/foad055/7492805 by guest on 23 January 2024
8 | FEMS Yea st Resear c h , 2024, Vol. 24
and Metschnikowia hamakuensis can only produce poorly developed
pseudohyphae (Kurtzman et al. 2011 ). Similarly, species within
the genus Blastobotrys (order Dipodascales ) produce various forms
of hyphae; for example, Blastobotrys adeninivorans , Blastobotrys atti-
norum , and Blastobotrys parvus produce true hyphae with distinct
septa, while Blastobotrys aristata, Blastobotrys nivea, and Blastobotrys
proliferans produce true hyphae that are hyaline or tr anspar ent
(von Klopotek 1967 , Sesma and Ramirez 1978 ; Kurtzman and Rob-
nett 2007 ).
The dimensions of pseudohyphae and true hyphae are often
unc har acterized, but data fr om 17 species suggest that the aver-
age width of hyphae is 3.5 μm. The width of hyphae and pseudo-
hyphae ranges from 1 μm in Ce. fr agr ans (order Serinales ) to up to
8 μm in Al. hylecoeti (order Alloascoideales ) . The diameter of hyphae
does not vary as much as the size of other yeast cell types. For
example, the size of budding cells of Ce. albidus and Ce. fr agr ans
(order Serinales ) range from 3 μm to 6 μm but generate hyphae
with diameters of 1 μm to 3 μm.
Conclusions
We have characterized cell morphology traits of a representa-
tive set of 332 species in the subphylum Sacc harom ycotina , whic h
has r e v ealed extensiv e div ersity of cell sha pes and sizes, as well
as budding types and lament production (Kurtzman et al. 2011 ,
Shen et al. 2018 ). Model species of yeasts exhibit cellular morpho-
logical diversity that differs from the typical spherical and ovoid
budding displayed by S. cerevisiae ; their ascospore morphologies
also differ from those observed in S. cerevisiae . Across the yeast
phylogen y, budding cells ar e typicall y r ound (i.e . o void or spher-
ical) with an av er a ge diameter twice the size of a typical bacte-
rial species, such as Escherichia coli (Fig. 2 ). Most yeast species do
not utilize the poles of the cells and instead r epr oduce asexuall y
via m ultilater al budding. Furthermor e, mor e than half of yeasts
can generate pseudohyphae or true septate hyphae . T he sexual
cell morphology of yeasts includes ascospores that are typically
spherical or hat-sha ped, mostl y found in pairs or quartets within
an ascus (Fig. 3 ). The great interspecies diversity is nicely exem-
plied in the cell morphology traits of asexual cell shape and size,
lament production, and sexual cell shape (Fig. 4 and Table S1 ).
An organism will display various cell morphology phenotypes,
whic h ar e likel y r eected in the collectiv e inter actions of pr otein
components and their r elativ e abundances (Chiou et al. 2017 , Bar-
ber et al. 2020 ). Regarding cell morphology, cellular functions, such
as division and r epr oduction, ar e contr olled by the m ultiple path-
ways within the cell polarity network (CPN). In the baker’s yeast
S. cerevisiae , cell polarity is responsible for the localization of pro-
teins to sites of division for successful budding, mating, and l-
ament pr oduction. Highl y conserv ed pr oteins in the CPN include
the GTP ase Cdc42, whic h r ecruits downstr eam pr oteins for polar-
ization at the plasma membrane or can detach following polar-
ization to diffuse fr eel y (Chiou et al. 2017 , Diepe v een et al. 2018 ).
Cell size in S. cerevisiae is closely regulated during the cell cy-
cle phases, with incr eased pr otein abundance of Whi5 correlated
with larger cell sizes (Barber et al. 2020 ). Whi5 phosphorylation
activity is maintained by two CPN proteins, Swi4 and Cln3; ac-
tivation is mediated by Whi3, but how these and other proteins
work together in Sacc harom ycotina yeasts to control cell morphol-
ogy is unknown. Functional relationships between genes can be
r e v ealed by orthologous gene coevolution networks; for example,
coe volutionary anal ysis of 2 400 orthologous genes acr oss the
332 Sacc harom ycotina yeasts found that CDC6 , a gene essential for
replication, is connected to 96 other orthologs (Steenwyk et al.
2022 ). Furthermore, the genes that were found to coevolve with
CDC6 acr oss Sacc harom ycotina sho w ed substantial ov erla p with the
genes found to geneticall y inter act with CDC6 in S. cerevisiae (Con-
stanzo et al. 2010 ). An example of budding cell shape that is tightly
associated with budding type occurs in the genus Hanseniaspora,
in which all species reproduce by bipolar budding and exhibit
a piculate-sha ped budding cells. Inter estingl y, most Hanseniaspora
species have lost over 700 genes in comparison to S. cerevisiae , in-
cluding WHI5 and many others involved in the cell cycle (Steen-
wyk et al. 2019 ).
Another a ppr oac h for identifying candidate genes and path-
ways that have likely contributed to variation in yeast cellular
morphology is experimental evolution. Experimental evolution
studies have shown that both new cell morphologies, including
m ulticellular structur es, and consider able differ ences in existing
traits (e.g. cell size) can arise quite rapidly and via diverse mu-
tational r outes (Bozda g et al. 2021 , Farkas et al. 2022 ). Interest-
ingl y, experimental e v olution of S. cerevisiae follo wing the deletion
of genes involved in the CPN can r ecov er quic kl y and r epr oducibl y.
For example, deletion of the gene encoding the CPN protein Bem1
can be rescued by subsequent compensatory mutations in BEM2
and BEM3 , which encode Rho GTPase -activating proteins, after
1 000 generations (Laan et al. 2015 ). Future evolutionary experi-
ments that focus on yeast cell morphologies should be performed
to further understand the genetic mechanisms involved in their
generation and evolution.
The cellular morphology of Saccharomycotina asexual and sex-
ual cells is highly diverse, with various patterns observed within
and across its taxonomic orders, but the association of morpho-
logical traits within and between species is not well c har acterized.
For example, as mentioned pr e viousl y, the genus Hanseniaspora
r epr oduce asexuall y by bipolar budding whic h r esults in a picu-
late shaped cells, but it is unknown whether this is due to co-
incidence or whether it reects functional constraints between
the type of budding and specic cell sha pes. Futur e studies of
how the cell morphology network is evolving across yeasts could
benet with studies of association between and within the diver-
sity of asexual cell traits and sexual cell traits of Saccharomycotina
yeasts.
Ac kno wledgements
We thank Marie-Claire Harrison for help with Fig. 4 , members of
the Rokas lab and the Y1000 + Project for helpful discussions and
comments, and Robert A. Sclafani for strain S288C. This material
is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation
under Grant Nos. DEB-1442148, DEB-2110403, DEB-1442113, and
DEB-2110404; in part by the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research
Center (DOE BER Ofce of Science DE-SC0018409); and the USDA
National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Hatch Projects 1020204
and 7005101). CTH is an H. I. Romnes Facu lty Fellow, supported by
the Ofce of the Vi ce Chancellor for Research and Graduate Edu-
cation with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foun-
dation. MARC Scholar G.K. is supported by a grant from the Na-
tional Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Insti-
tutes of Health: T34 GM136451. Research in AR’s lab is also sup-
ported by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01 AI153356), and the Burroughs
Wellcome Fund.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data is available at FEMSYR Journal online.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsyr/article/doi/10.1093/femsyr/foad055/7492805 by guest on 23 January 2024
Chavez et al. | 9
Conict of interest : Antonis Rokas is a scientic consultant for LifeM-
ine Ther a peutics, Inc.
References
Barber F , Amir A, Murray AW . Cell-size regulation in budding yeast
does not depend on linear accumulation of Whi5. P Natl Acad Sci
USA 2020; 117 :14243–50.
Bi E , Park HO. Cell polarization and cytokinesis in budding yeast. Ge-
netics 2012; 191 :347–87.
Bozdag GO , Zamani-Dahaj SA, Day TC et al. De novo evolution of
macr oscopic m ulticellularity. Biorxiv 2021. https:// doi.org/ 10.110
1/2021.08.03.454982
Chiou JG , Balasubramanian MK, Lew DJ. Cell polarity in Yeast. Annu
Rev Cell Dev Biol 2017; 33 :77–101.
Costanzo M , Baryshnik ov a A, Bellay J et al. The genetic landscape of
a cell. Science 2010; 327 :425–31.
Cullen PJ , Spr a gue GF. The r egulation of lamentous gr o wth in y east.
Genetics 2012; 190 :23–49.
Diepe v een ET , de la Cruz LI, Laan L. Evolutionary dynamics in the
fungal polarization network, a mechanistic perspective. Biophys
Rev 2017; 9 :375–87.
Diepe v een ET , Gehrmann T, Pourquié V et al. Patterns of conservation
and diversication in the fungal polarization network. Genome Biol
Evol 2018; 10 :1765–82.
Farkas Z , K o vács K, Sarkadi Z et al. Gene loss and compensatory
e volution pr omotes the emer gence of mor phological nov elties in
budding yeast. Nat Ecol Evol 2022; 6 :763–73.
Fischer G , Liti G, Llorente B. The budding yeast life cycle: more com-
plex than anticipated? Yea st 2021; 38 :5–11.
Gr eig D . Repr oductiv e isolation in sacc harom yces . Heredity
2009; 102 :39–44.
Gr oene wald M , Hittinger CT, Bensch K et al. A genome-informed
higher rank classication of the biotec hnologicall y important
fungal subphylum sacc harom ycotina . Stud Mycol 2023; 105 : 1–22 .
Herskowitz I . Life cycle of the budding yeast sacc harom yces cerevisiae .
Microbiol Rev 1988; 52 :536–53.
Hittinger CT , Rokas A, Bai FY et al. Genomics and the making of yeast
biodiversity. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2015; 35 :100–9.
Jung PP , Sigwalt A, Ohnuki S et al. Lar ge-scale surv ey of intr aspe-
cic tness and cell morphology variation in a protoploid yeast
species. G3 2016; 6 :1063–71.
Krassowski T , Kominek J, Shen XX et al. Multiple r einv entions of
mating-type switching during Budding Yeas t evolution. Curr Biol
2019; 29 :2555–62. e8.e8.
Kurtzman CP , Fell JW, Boekhout T. The Yea st s: a Taxonomic Study (5th
edn). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 2011.
Kurtzman CP , Robnett CJ. Alloascoidea hylecoeti gen. nov., comb. nov.,
Alloascoidea africana comb. nov., Ascoidea tarda sp. nov., and Nad-
sonia starkeyi-henricii comb. nov., new members of the Saccharomy-
cotina ( Ascomycota ). FEMS Ye as t Res 2013; 13 :423–32.
Kurtzman CP , Robnett CJ. Multigene phylogenetic analysis of the Tr i-
c homonascus, Wi c kerhamiella and Zygoascus yeast clades, and
the proposal of Sugiyamaella gen. nov. and 14 new species com-
binations. FEMS Yea st Res 2007; 7 :141–51. https:// doi.org/ 10.1111/
j.1567-1364.2006.00157.x
Laan L , Koschwanez JH, Murray AW. Evolutionary adaptation after
crippling cell polarization follows r epr oducible tr ajectories. eLife
2015; 4 :e09638.
Li Y , Steenwyk JL, Chang Y et al. A genome-scale phylogeny of the
kingdom fungi. Curr Biol 2021; 31 :1653–65.e5.e5.
Lynch M , Field MC, Goodson HV et al. Evolutionary cell biol-
ogy: two origins , one objective . P Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111 :
16990–4.
Nagy LG , Ohm RA, K o vács GM et al. Latent homology and conv er gent
r egulatory e volution underlies the r epeated emer gence of yeasts.
Nat Commun 2014; 5 :4471.
Opulente DA , Rollinson EJ, Bernick-Roehr C et al. Factors driving
metabolic diversity in the budding yeast subphylum. BMC Biol
2018; 16 :26.
Ruiz-Herr er a J , Sentandr eu R. Differ ent effectors of dimor phism in
Yarrowia lipol ytica . Arc h Microbiol 2002; 178 :477–83.
Rupert CB , Rusche LN. The pathogenic yeast Candida par a psilo-
sis forms pseudohyphae through different signaling pathways
depending on the available carbon source. mSphere 2022; 7 :
e0002922.
Sesma B , Ramirez C. A new species of Blastobotrys: b lastobotrys
navarrensis sp. nov. (Hyphomycetes). Mycopathologia 1978; 63 :
41–45.
Shen XX , Opulente DA, Kominek J et al. Tempo and mode of genome
evolution in the Budding Ye as t subphylum. Cell 2018; 175 :1533–45.
e20.e20.
Shen XX , Steenwyk JL, LaBella AL et al. Genome-scale phylogeny and
contrasting modes of genome evolution in the fungal phylum As-
comycota. Sci Adv 2020; 6 :eabd0079. https:// doi.org/ 10.1126/ scia
dv.abd0079
Skell y DA , Merrihe w GE, Rife M et al. Integr ativ e phenomics re-
veals insight into the structure of phenotypic diversity in budding
yeast. Genome Res 2013; 23 :1496–504.
Steenwyk JL , Opulente DA, Kominek J et al. Extensive loss of cell-cycle
and DNA repair genes in an ancient lineage of bipolar budding
yeasts. PLoS Biol 2019; 17 :e3000255.
Steenwyk JL , Phillips MA, Yang F et al. An orthologous gene coevo-
lution network provides insight into eukaryotic cellular and ge-
nomic structure and function. Sci Adv 2022; 8 :eabn0105.
Sun S , Gresham D. Cellular quiescence in budding yeast. Yeas t
2021; 38 :12–29.
von Klopotek A . Blastobotrys nivea gen.no v., sp.no v. Archiv Mikrobiol
1967; 58 :92–96.
Yvert G , Ohnuki S, Nogami S et al. Single-cell phenomics r e v eals
intr a-species v ariation of phenotypic noise in yeast. BMC Syst Biol
2013; 7 :54.
Recei v ed 7 Mar c h 2023; revised 4 November 2023; accepted 22 December 2023
©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford Uni v ersity Pr ess on behalf of FEMS. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Cr eati v e Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc- nd/4.0/ ), which permits non-commercial r e pr oduction and distribution of the
work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact
journals.permissions@oup.com
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsyr/article/doi/10.1093/femsyr/foad055/7492805 by guest on 23 January 2024
Chapter
The coevolution of plants and fungi is of key importance to the emergence and diversification of life on land. Much of our understanding of this long-shared evolutionary history comes from (1) the study of living species, in particular through molecular phylogenetics, and (2) direct fossil evidence of plant–fungus interactions and fungal diversity in general. However, little is known about the aquatic–terrestrial transitions in fungal evolution. In this article, we discuss some hypotheses that have arisen from molecular phylogenies and the fossil record, and we highlight particular traits that can be helpful to understand the origin of fungi and their evolutionary history.
Article
Full-text available
While early multicellular lineages necessarily started out as relatively simple groups of cells, little is known about how they became Darwinian entities capable of sustained multicellular evolution1–3. Here we investigate this with a multicellularity long-term evolution experiment, selecting for larger group size in the snowflake yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) model system. Given the historical importance of oxygen limitation⁴, our ongoing experiment consists of three metabolic treatments⁵—anaerobic, obligately aerobic and mixotrophic yeast. After 600 rounds of selection, snowflake yeast in the anaerobic treatment group evolved to be macroscopic, becoming around 2 × 10⁴ times larger (approximately mm scale) and about 10⁴-fold more biophysically tough, while retaining a clonal multicellular life cycle. This occurred through biophysical adaptation—evolution of increasingly elongate cells that initially reduced the strain of cellular packing and then facilitated branch entanglements that enabled groups of cells to stay together even after many cellular bonds fracture. By contrast, snowflake yeast competing for low oxygen⁵ remained microscopic, evolving to be only around sixfold larger, underscoring the critical role of oxygen levels in the evolution of multicellular size. Together, this research provides unique insights into an ongoing evolutionary transition in individuality, showing how simple groups of cells overcome fundamental biophysical limitations through gradual, yet sustained, multicellular evolution.
Article
Full-text available
Candida parapsilosis is one of the leading causes of hospital-acquired yeast infections and poses a significant risk to immunocompromised people. Two of its properties that contribute to infection are metabolic flexibility, to use a range of nutrients available in the host, and cellular dimorphism, to switch between round yeast cells and chains of elongated pseudohyphal cells.
Article
Full-text available
The evolutionary rates of functionally related genes often covary. We present a gene coevolution network inferred from examining nearly 3 million orthologous gene pairs from 332 budding yeast species spanning ~400 million years of evolution. Network modules provide insight into cellular and genomic structure and function. Examination of the phenotypic impact of network perturbation using deletion mutant data from the baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which were obtained from previously published studies, suggests that fitness in diverse environments is affected by orthologous gene neighborhood and connectivity. Mapping the network onto the chromosomes of S. cerevisiae and Candida albicans revealed that coevolving orthologous genes are not physically clustered in either species; rather, they are often located on different chromosomes or far apart on the same chromosome. The coevolution network captures the hierarchy of cellular structure and function, provides a roadmap for genotype-to-phenotype discovery, and portrays the genome as a linked ensemble of genes.
Article
Full-text available
Deleterious mutations are generally considered to be irrelevant for morphological evolution. However, they could be compensated by conditionally beneficial mutations, thereby providing access to new adaptive paths. Here we use high-dimensional phenotyping of laboratory-evolved budding yeast lineages to demonstrate that new cellular morphologies emerge exceptionally rapidly as a by-product of gene loss and subsequent compensatory evolution. Unexpectedly, the capacities for invasive growth, multicellular aggregation and biofilm formation also spontaneously evolve in response to gene loss. These multicellular phenotypes can be achieved by diverse mutational routes and without reactivating the canonical regulatory pathways. These ecologically and clinically relevant traits originate as pleiotropic side effects of compensatory evolution and have no obvious utility in the laboratory environment. The extent of morphological diversity in the evolved lineages is comparable to that of natural yeast isolates with diverse genetic backgrounds and lifestyles. Finally, we show that both the initial gene loss and subsequent compensatory mutations contribute to new morphologies, with their synergistic effects underlying specific morphological changes. We conclude that compensatory evolution is a previously unrecognized source of morphological diversity and phenotypic novelties.
Preprint
Full-text available
The evolution of large organismal size is fundamentally important for multicellularity, creating new ecological niches and opportunities for the evolution of increased biological complexity. Yet little is known about how large size evolves, particularly in nascent multicellular organisms that lack genetically-regulated multicellular development. Here we examine the interplay between biological and biophysical drivers of macroscopic multicellularity using long-term experimental evolution. Over 600 daily transfers (~3,000 generations), multicellular snowflake yeast evolved macroscopic size, becoming ~2·10 ⁴ times larger (~mm scale) and 10 ⁴ -fold more biophysically tough, while remaining clonal. They accomplished this through sustained biophysical adaptation, evolving increasingly elongate cells that initially reduced the strain of cellular packing, then facilitated branch entanglement so that groups of cells stay together even after many cellular bonds fracture. Four out of five replicate populations show evidence of predominantly adaptive evolution, with mutations becoming significantly enriched in genes affecting cell shape and cell-cell bonds. Taken together, this work shows how selection acting on the emergent properties of simple multicellular groups can drive sustained biophysical adaptation, an early step in the evolution of increasingly complex multicellular organisms.
Article
Full-text available
Cellular quiescence, the temporary and reversible exit from proliferative growth, is the predominant state of all cells. However, our understanding of the biological processes and molecular mechanisms that underlie cell quiescence remains incomplete. As with the mitotic cell cycle, budding and fission yeast are preeminent model systems for studying cellular quiescence owing to their rich experimental toolboxes and the evolutionary conservation across eukaryotes of pathways and processes that control quiescence. Here, we review current knowledge of cell quiescence in budding yeast and how it pertains to cellular quiescence in other organisms, including multicellular animals. Quiescence entails large‐scale remodeling of virtually every cellular process, organelle, gene expression, and metabolic state that is executed dynamically as cells undergo the initiation, maintenance, and exit from quiescence. We review these major transitions, our current understanding of their molecular bases, and highlight unresolved questions. We summarize the primary methods employed for quiescence studies in yeast and discuss their relative merits. Understanding cell quiescence has important consequences for human disease as quiescent single‐celled microbes are notoriously difficult to kill and quiescent human cells play important roles in diseases such as cancer. We argue that research on cellular quiescence will be accelerated through the adoption of common criteria, and methods, for defining cell quiescence. An integrated approach to studying cell quiescence, and a focus on the behavior of individual cells, will yield new insights into the pathways and processes that underlie cell quiescence leading to a more complete understanding of the life cycle of cells. Take Away Quiescent cells are viable cells that have reversibly exited the cell cycle Quiescence is induced in response to a variety of nutrient starvation signals Quiescence is executed dynamically through three phases: initiation, maintenance, and exit Quiescence entails large‐scale remodeling of gene expression, organelles, and metabolism Single‐cell approaches are required to address heterogeneity among quiescent cells
Article
Full-text available
The budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has served as a model for nearly a century to understand the principles of the eukaryotic life cycle. The canonical life cycle of S. cerevisiae comprises a regular alternation between haploid and diploid phases. Haploid gametes generated by sporulation are expected to quickly restore the diploid phase mainly through inbreeding via intratetrad mating or haploselfing, thereby promoting genome homozygotization. However, recent large population genomics data unveiled that heterozygosity and polyploidy are unexpectedly common. This raises the interesting paradox of a haplo‐diplobiontic species being well‐adapted to inbreeding and able to maintain high levels of heterozygosity and polyploidy, thereby suggesting an unanticipated complexity of the yeast life cycle. Here, we propose that unprogrammed mating type switching, heterothallism, reduced spore formation and viability, cell–cell fusion and dioecy could play key and uncharted contributions to generate and maintain heterozygosity through polyploidization. Take away • Heterozygosity and polyploidy are unexpectedly common in S. cerevisiae. • Heterozygosity level positively correlates with ploidy. • Heterozygosity could be generated through polyploidization during the life cycle.
Article
The subphylum Saccharomycotina is a lineage in the fungal phylum Ascomycota that exhibits levels of genomic diversity similar to those of plants and animals. The Saccharomycotina consist of more than 1 200 known species currently divided into 16 families, one order, and one class. Species in this subphylum are ecologically and metabolically diverse and include important opportunistic human pathogens, as well as species important in biotechnological applications. Many traits of biotechnological interest are found in closely related species and often restricted to single phylogenetic clades. However, the biotechnological potential of most yeast species remains unexplored. Although the subphylum Saccharomycotina has much higher rates of genome sequence evolution than its sister subphylum, Pezizomycotina , it contains only one class compared to the 16 classes in Pezizomycotina . The third subphylum of Ascomycota , the Taphrinomycotina , consists of six classes and has approximately 10 times fewer species than the Saccharomycotina . These data indicate that the current classification of all these yeasts into a single class and a single order is an underappreciation of their diversity. Our previous genome-scale phylogenetic analyses showed that the Saccharomycotina contains 12 major and robustly supported phylogenetic clades; seven of these are current families ( Lipomycetaceae , Trigonopsidaceae , Alloascoideaceae , Pichiaceae , Phaffomycetaceae , Saccharomycodaceae , and Saccharomycetaceae ), one comprises two current families ( Dipodascaceae and Trichomonascaceae ), one represents the genus Sporopachydermia , and three represent lineages that differ in their translation of the CUG codon (CUG-Ala, CUG-Ser1, and CUG-Ser2). Using these analyses in combination with relative evolutionary divergence and genome content analyses, we propose an updated classification for the Saccharomycotina , including seven classes and 12 orders that can be diagnosed by genome content. This updated classification is consistent with the high levels of genomic diversity within this subphylum and is necessary to make the higher rank classification of the Saccharomycotina more comparable to that of other fungi, as well as to communicate efficiently on lineages that are not yet formally named.
Article
Phylogenomic studies using genome-scale amounts of data have greatly improved understanding of the tree of life. Despite the diversity, ecological significance, and biomedical and industrial importance of fungi, evolutionary relationships among several major lineages remain poorly resolved, especially those near the base of the fungal phylogeny. To examine poorly resolved relationships and assess progress toward a genome-scale phylogeny of the fungal kingdom, we compiled a phylogenomic data matrix of 290 genes from the genomes of 1,644 species that includes representatives from most major fungal lineages. We also compiled 11 data matrices by subsampling genes or taxa from the full data matrix based on filtering criteria previously shown to improve phylogenomic inference. Analyses of these 12 data matrices using concatenation- and coalescent-based approaches yielded a robust phylogeny of the fungal kingdom, in which ∼85% of internal branches were congruent across data matrices and approaches used. We found support for several historically poorly resolved relationships as well as evidence for polytomies likely stemming from episodes of ancient diversification. By examining the relative evolutionary divergence of taxonomic groups of equivalent rank, we found that fungal taxonomy is broadly aligned with both genome sequence divergence and divergence time but also identified lineages where current taxonomic circumscription does not reflect their levels of evolutionary divergence. Our results provide a robust phylogenomic framework to explore the tempo and mode of fungal evolution and offer directions for future fungal phylogenetic and taxonomic studies.