Parental Attachment and Proactive-Reactive Aggression in Adolescence: The Mediating Role of Self-Control and Perspective Taking

Abstract

Introduction
Identifying risk and protective factors of aggressive behavior during adolescence is beneficial for the intervention and prevention treatments. Although studies show that attachment quality is closely related to aggression, the underlying psychological mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the links of parental attachment with proactive and reactive aggression and to examine the mediating role of perspective taking and self-control among Chinese adolescents.

Methods
A cluster sampling method was used to recruit participants from several high schools located in the central regions of China. A total of 2982 participants (Mage = 17.28, SD = 0.83, range 15~20 years; 1602 girls, 1380 boys) were included in the final analysis.

Results
Correlation analysis showed that participants possessing higher attachment security with parents were more likely to report lower levels of proactive and reactive aggression. And, self-control and perspective taking were positively associated with parental attachment, and negatively associated with both types of aggression. Moreover, structural equation models indicated that parental attachment directly, and indirectly predicted proactive and reactive aggression through self-control and perspective taking.

Discussion
Overall, this study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the explanatory mechanisms that link adolescent-parent attachment and aggression, and suggest that high quality of adolescent-parent interactions may promote adolescents’ self-control and perspectives taking, which further reduces their aggression propensity.

Full text

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Parental Attachment and Proactive-Reactive
Aggression in Adolescence: The Mediating Role of
Self-Control and Perspective Taking
Qingqing Li
1–3
, Ming Gao
4
, Yanfang Deng
4
, Zongkui Zhou
1–3
, Jing Wang
1–3
1
Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China;
2
Key Laboratory
of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, School of Psychology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China;
3
School of Psychology,
Central China Normal University, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China;
4
Beijing Dentons (Yichang) Law Ofce, Yichang, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Jing Wang, School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, LuoYu Road 152, Hongshan Region, Wuhan, People’s Republic
of China, Email jingwang888@ccnu.edu.cn
Introduction: Identifying risk and protective factors of aggressive behavior during adolescence is benecial for the intervention and
prevention treatments. Although studies show that attachment quality is closely related to aggression, the underlying psychological
mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the links of parental attachment with proactive and reactive aggression
and to examine the mediating role of perspective taking and self-control among Chinese adolescents.
Methods: A cluster sampling method was used to recruit participants from several high schools located in the central regions of
China. A total of 2982 participants (M
age
= 17.28, SD = 0.83, range 15~20 years; 1602 girls, 1380 boys) were included in the nal
analysis.
Results: Correlation analysis showed that participants possessing higher attachment security with parents were more likely to report
lower levels of proactive and reactive aggression. And, self-control and perspective taking were positively associated with parental
attachment, and negatively associated with both types of aggression. Moreover, structural equation models indicated that parental
attachment directly, and indirectly predicted proactive and reactive aggression through self-control and perspective taking.
Discussion: Overall, this study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the explanatory mechanisms that link
adolescent-parent attachment and aggression, and suggest that high quality of adolescent-parent interactions may promote adolescents’
self-control and perspectives taking, which further reduces their aggression propensity.
Keywords: attachment, aggression, self-control, perspective taking, adolescence
Introduction
Over the past decades, the study of aggressive behaviors has emerged as a prominent area of investigation within
developmental psychology and psychopathology. Early-life persistent patterns of aggressive behavior are considered as
potential precursors to subsequent issues such as substance abuse, violent crime, and health problems.
1,2
In an attempt
to understand the underlying mechanisms of aggression, researchers have classied aggression into two main types:
proactive and reactive aggression. This dichotomous perspective holds the promise of illuminating distinct etiological
pathways of aggression.
3,4
Proactive aggression is described as instrumental and organized behavior aimed at gaining
a reward or social dominance over others, whereas reactive aggression has been characterized as a response to
provocation or a perceived threat.
5–7
Individuals exhibiting reactive aggression are more likely to react impulsively
in the face of provocation, while those displaying proactive aggression tend to exhibit lower emotional reactivity and
higher levels of instrumentality in their pursuit of benets. Longitudinal research has provided evidence suggesting
that proactive and reactive aggression are unique constructs with separate developmental trajectories and distinct
associated factors.
8
Identifying the risk and protective factors of both types of aggressive behavior during adolescence
is crucial in recognizing the emergence and cessation of aggression, thereby informs effective intervention and
Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2023:16 3437–3446 3437
© 2023 Li et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work
you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For
permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Dovepress
open access to scientific and medical research
Open Access Full Text Article
Received: 4 July 2023
Accepted: 17 August 2023
Published: 28 August 2023

prevention strategies. Recently, abundant evidence has emphasized the signicance of parental attachment in shaping
aggressive behaviors. The present study aimed to investigate the associations between parental attachment and
proactive and reactive aggression, while also examining the potential mediating roles of self-control and perspective
taking in these relationships.
The Link Between Parental Attachment and Aggression
Parental attachment refers to the establishment of secure and nurturing bonds between children and their parents, which
provides a foundation for the development of cognitive, social, and emotional competence from childhood throughout
adulthood.
9–11
According to Bowlby’s attachment theory,
12
early experiences of relationships with parents shape the
internal working models (ie, cognitive representations) of self and other, which are believed to inuence and guide
distinctive patterns of cognition, affect regulation, and behavior not only within family interactions but also in subsequent
relationships with peers and close others.
13–15
Specically, individuals who experience caring, responsive, and trust-
worthy relationships with parents are presumed to develop secure working models, and therefore adopting a similarly
trusting, open, and collaborative approach toward peers and partners later in life.
16,17
On the other hand, individuals who
experience neglectful, rejecting, and intrusive relationships with parents are prone to develop insecure working models,
potentially leading to problematic interpersonal functioning.
Empirical evidence suggests that adolescents higher in attachment insecurity are more likely to engage in psycho-
logical aggression, physical and verbal aggression, hostility, and proactive and reactive aggression.
10,18–22
Conversely,
secure attachment may play an important role in mitigating deleterious effects and promoting adjustment in adolescence.
For instance, parental attachment quality was negatively associated with proactive and reactive aggression, and mitigated
the adverse effect of emotion regulation difculty on proactive and reactive aggression.
21
Hare et al found that
attachment security moderated the association between paternal aggression and adolescent aggression, suggesting that
attachment security may help attenuate the transmission of harmful conict strategies across generations.
20,23
Research
also indicate that high-quality relationships with parents play a signicant role in promoting adolescents’ psychosocial
adjustment and life satisfaction.
24,25
In summary, the quality of parental attachment was assumed to be negatively
associated with proactive and reactive aggression.
The Mediating Role of Self-Control
Conceptually, self-control is dened as the ability to inhibit and alter dominant impulses or responses to support the
pursuit of long-term and valued goals.
26,27
According to the self-control theory, effective parenting, including monitor-
ing, recognition, and discipline, facilitates the development of self-control, whereas negative parenting impedes self-
control development, leading to an increased risk of externalizing and deviant behaviors.
28
Empirical and review studies
demonstrate that effective parenting practices could promote the development of emotion and behavior regulation
abilities among children and adolescents.
29–33
Specically, warm and caring parent-adolescent relationships are posi-
tively associated with self-regulation behavior across early to late adolescence,
34–36
whereas insensitive and harsh
parenting is related to lower inhibitory self-control and executive functioning.
31,37,38
Both empirical and theoretical research consistently indicate that self-control serves as a vital protective factor in
preventing and restraining the formation and progression of aggressive behaviors.
39,40
Adolescents with high self-control
tend to exhibit more positive coping and prosocial behaviors,
41,42
and have lower tendency to ruminate about angry
events, which further contribute to lower levels of aggression.
43
Furthermore, self-control may be an important mediating
mechanism that explains the effect of parental attachment on adolescents’ maladaptive responses and aggression.
Specically, secure parental attachment is linked to higher self-control, which in turn is associated with more prosocial
behaviors and fewer rule-breaking behaviors.
42,44
On the other hand, lower quality of adolescent-parent interactions
coincides with dysfunctional self-regulation in adolescent, which in turn was associated with higher maladaptive peer
relationships.
45,46
Moreover, a cross-cultural study demonstrates that paternal attachment inuenced adolescents’ adjust-
ment difculties directly, and indirectly through self-control.
47
Therefore, it is hypothesized that parental attachment
quality would be positively associated with higher self-control, and negatively associated with aggression.
https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S423270
DovePress
Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2023:16
3438
Li et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

The Mediating Role of Perspective Taking
Perspective taking (ie, cognitive empathy), refers to the ability to recognize and understand other people’ s emotions,
viewpoints, and situations, and plays an important role in social adaptation and interpersonal relationship.
48–51
Research
has indicated that relationships with parents play a socializing role in the development of perspective taking abilities among
adolescents.
52
More specically, individuals who have a secure attachment with parents tend to exhibit higher levels of
perspective-taking and empathic concern than their counterparts.
53,54
Conversely, insecure-anxious individuals tend to focus
on their own unregulated emotions when exposed to others in distress.
55
Taubner et al suggested that adolescents’ perspective-
taking abilities play a moderating role in the relationship between psychopathic traits and proactive aggression,
56
suggesting
that perspective-taking may serve as a protective factor in preventing proactive aggression in adolescence.
Perspective taking is acknowledged for its signicance in comprehending the needs of others in distress and is
considered a protective factor against aggression.
57,58
Research shows that perspective taking facilitates prosocial actions
and mitigates aggressive behaviors.
59
Adolescents with lower perspective taking are at a higher risk of engaging in
various forms of bullying and aggressive behaviors, such as name calling, indirect bullying, and violent behaviors.
60
Indeed, children and adolescents who are more aggressive and less prosocial tend to have decits in perspective taking
and emotional empathy.
61
Previous work investigating the connection between parental attachment, perspective-taking,
and aggression has demonstrated that adolescents’ attachment security with parents was positively associated with
perspective taking, while both attachment security and perspective-taking were negatively related to aggressive
tendencies.
62
Moreover, higher levels of attachment avoidance predicted lower perspective taking, which in turn,
predicted reduced altruistic behavior.
63
However, controversy remains in the literature regarding the relationship between
perspective taking and aggression. For instance, some studies revealed a lack of association between aggression and
perspective taking in adolescents.
60,64
Batanova and Loukas found that perspective taking predicted increased relational
aggression one year later.
65
Researchers suggested that individuals may utilize perspective-taking skills for aggressive
behaviors in order to maintain or enhance their social status and dominance.
64,66
Considering these mixed ndings, the
relationship between perspective taking and aggression should be further claried.
In reviewing the existing literature, it is evident that few studies have delved into the relationship between parental attachment
and proactive and reactive aggression. Furthermore, no research has directly investigated the role of self-control and perspective
taking underlying these associations. Thus, the present study aimed to examine the associations between parental attachment and
proactive and reactive aggression, while simultaneously exploring the mediating role of self-control and perspective taking.
Building upon the theoretical and empirical evidence, the present study proposed that self-control and perspective taking could
play a mediating role in the association between parental attachment and proactive and reactive aggression in adolescence.
Methods
Participants and Procedure
This cross-sectional study employed a cluster sampling method to recruit 3200 participants from several high schools in
Henan and Hubei Province located in the central regions of China. The researcher rst introduced the purpose of the
study and related questionnaires to the school manager before collectively administering the questionnaires to student on
a class basis. Under the guidance of trained teachers, students were presented with an introduction to the purpose of the
study and the condentiality of their answers. Subsequently, guidelines were read out to the students, explaining the
relevant instructions on how to complete the questionnaire and what aspects to consider during the process. The entire
survey process lasted approximately 20 minutes, and the questionnaires were collected from the participants upon
completion. Demographic characteristics were also collected: age, gender, family economic incomes (1 = 1000¥ and
below; 2 = 1001~3000¥; 3 = 3001~5000¥; 4 = 5000~10,000¥; 5 = 10,001~20,000¥; 6 = 20,000¥ and above), residence
(ie, rural or urban area), and parent education (1 = primary school and below; 2 = middle school; 3 = high school degree
or special school degree; 4 = undergraduate degree; 5 = graduate degree or above). A total of 2982 participants (M
age
=
17.28, SD = 0.83, range 15~20 years; 1602 girls, 1380 boys) were included in the nal analysis. The effective collection
rate of questionnaires was 93.19%. All adolescent participants and their parents signed an informed consent document
Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2023:16 https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S423270
DovePress
3439
Dovepress Li et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

and were offered an honorarium. Ethical approval of this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of Central China
Normal University, and all procedures were in accordance with the Ethics of Declaration of Helsinki.
Measurements
Parental attachment was measured using the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (36-item),
67
which includes the
cognitive-affective dimensions of trust in parent and peer, and accessibility and responsiveness. Two subscales (mother
and father attachment, each containing 12 items) were used to assess three key aspects of attachment: trust (eg, “My
mother/father accepts me as I am”), communication (eg, “My mother/father helps me to understand myself better”), and
alienation (eg, “I don’t get much attention from my father/mother”, reversed). Participants were asked to rate their
agreement on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Previous research has supported
the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of this inventory.
68,69
In the present study, Cronbach’ s alpha for mother
attachment and father attachment was 0.85 and 0.86, respectively.
Proactive aggression and reactive aggression were assessed using a well-validated proactive-reactive aggression
questionnaire,
3
which consists of 23 items. Specically, 11 items assessed reactive aggression (eg, “Reacted angrily when
provoked by others”), and 12 items assessed proactive aggression (eg, “Hurt others to win a game”). All items were rated on
a 3-point scale (0 = never, 1 = sometimes, and 2 = often), with higher scores indicating a higher level of aggression. Research has
indicated that this questionnaire has good reliability and validity in Chinese children and adolescents.
70,71
In this study, Cronbach’s
alpha was 0.85 for proactive aggression, 0.81 for reactive aggression, and 0.84 for total aggression.
Self-control measured with the Trait Self-Control Scale.
72,73
Participants were asked to indicate the extent to which
they agree with on 13 items (eg “I am good at resisting temptation”) with a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all like me, 5 =
very much like me). Items were averaged so that higher scores indicated greater self-control ability. Cronbach’s alpha of
this scale was 0.82 in the present study.
Perspective taking was measured using ve items from the Interpersonal Reactivity Index.
50
Respondents indicated
the extent to which they agree with each item (eg, “I sometimes try to understand my friends better by imagining how
things look from their perspective”) on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all like me, 5 = very much like me), with higher
scores indicating greater perspective taking. Items were averaged and higher scores reect greater perspective taking.
Previous research has supported the reliability and validity of this inventory in the context of Chinese culture.
62,63
Cronbach’s alpha of this scale in this study was 0.81.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics and correlations analysis were conducted with SPSS 24.0. To assess the meditating effect of self-control and
perspective taking underlying the associations between parental attachment and aggression outcomes, structural equation models
were conducted using M-plus 7.0. Specically, father attachment and mother attachment were treated as independent variables
(X), self-control and perspectives taking as the mediator variables (M), and proactive aggression and reactive aggression as the
separate independent variables (Y), with sex, age, income, residence, and parent education as covariates. The chi-square,
comparative t index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), root–mean–square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized
root–mean–square residual (SRMR) were used to evaluate the measurement model t. The following criteria were used to
indicate the goodness of t: CFI ≥ 0.90, RMSEA ≤ 0.10, and SRMR ≤ 0.10.
74
Results
Common Methods Bias Analysis
To check and test common method bias, Harman’ s single-factor test using conrmatory factor analysis was conducted.
A factor analysis was conducted on all items of the scales including parental attachment, self-control, perspectives taking,
proactive aggression and reactive aggression, and a common factor from these items was extracted. The interpretation
rate of the rst factor was 16.77%, less than 40%, indicating that there was no common method bias in this study.
https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S423270
DovePress
Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2023:16
3440
Li et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis
Table 1 presents the means, standard deviations, and t-test results on sex differences. Girls reported higher level of
attachment to parents and perspective taking than boys. Boys exhibited higher levels of both proactive and reactive
aggression compared to girls.
Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix for model variables were shown in Table 2. In terms of aggressive tendencies,
adolescents exhibited low to moderate levels of reactive aggression and low levels of proactive aggression. As mentioned
above, proactive and reactive aggression were more prevalent in the boys. Correlation analysis showed that income and
parental education were signicantly and positively associated with parental attachment. Moreover, parental attachment was
positively correlated with self-control and perspectives taking, and negatively correlated with proactive aggression and
reactive aggression. Moreover, higher levels of self-control and perspectives taking were associated with lower proactive
and reactive aggression. This suggests that participants with secure attachment to mother and father are associated with higher
levels of self-control and perspectives taking, while also displaying lower levels of proactive and reactive aggressive behavior.
Mediation Analysis
As portrayed in Figure 1, the structural equation models were tted was to examine the mediating effect of self-control
with father/mother attachment as predictors and proactive and reactive aggression as outcomes. The model t the data
adequately, χ
2 (9)
= 70.77, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.96; TLI = 0.92; RMSEA = 0.05, 90% [CI: 0.04, 0.06]; SRMR = 0.03. As
predicted, mother attachment predicted proactive aggression (direct effect coefcient = −0.11, 95% CI [−0.157, −0.071])
and reactive aggression (direct effect coefcient = −0.07, 95% CI [−0.112, −0.016]) directly, and indirectly through self-
control (indirect effect coefcient = −0.002, 95% CI [−0.004, −0.001] for proactive aggression; indirect effect coefcient
= −0.029, 95% CI [−0.039, −0.019] for reactive aggression). Similarly, father attachment predicted proactive aggression
Table 1 Descriptive Statistics of Sex Difference
Variables Girl (N = 1602) Boy (N = 1380) t p
M SD M SD
Mother attachment 3.77 0.65 3.67 0.60 3.92 < 0.001
Father attachment 3.70 0.67 3.60 0.65 4.46 < 0.001
Self-control 2.68 0.56 2.70 0.59 −1.23 > 0.05
Perspectives taking 3.57 0.72 3.45 0.75 4.47 < 0.001
Proactive aggression 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.22 −10.16 < 0.001
Reactive aggression 0.59 0.32 0.62 0.35 −2.11 < 0.05
Abbreviations: N, number; SD, standard deviation.
Table 2 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations Among Variables (N = 2982)
Variables M SD 123456789
Income 3.22 1.06 –
Mother education 1.61 0.79 0.19** –
Father education 1.93 0.83 0.21** 0.51** –
Mother attachment 3.72 0.63 0.06** 0.09** 0.08**
Father attachment 3.66 0.66 0.08** 0.06** 0.07** 0.67** –
Self-control 2.69 0.57 −0.01 0.01 −0.01 0.32** 0.34** -
Perspectives taking 3.52 0.74 −0.01 0.02 0.03 0.22** 0.20** 0.25** -
Proactive aggression 0.07 0.17 −0.04 0.02 0.02 −0.19** −0.18** −0.11** −0.14** -
Reactive aggression 0.60 0.33 −0.01 −0.01 −0.03 −0.23** −0.25** −0.40** −0.24** 0.37** -
Note: **p < 0.01.
Abbreviations: N, number; SD, standard deviation.
Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2023:16 https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S423270
DovePress
3441
Dovepress Li et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

(direct effect coefcient = −0.07, 95% CI [−0.113, −0.029]) and reactive aggression (direct effect coefcient = −0.08,
95% CI [−0.129, −0.036]) directly, and through self-control indirectly (indirect effect coefcient == −0.003, 95% CI
[−0.006, −0.001] for proactive aggression; indirect effect coefcient = −0.042, 95% CI [−0.052, −0.034] for reactive
aggression). Finally, we conducted a chi-square difference test to examine the potential differences between mother and
father in their contributions to aggression outcomes. Results revealed no signicant differences in the mediating effect of
self-control between father attachment and mother attachment (proactive aggression: χ
2 (1)
= 2.39, p > 0.05; reactive
aggression: χ
2 (1)
= 3.29, p > 0.05).
A second structural equation model was established to examine the mediating effect of perspective taking with father/
mother attachment as predictors and proactive and reactive aggression as outcomes (Figure 2). The model t the data
adequately, χ
2 (9)
= 63.72, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.95; TLI = 0.90; RMSEA = 0.04, 90% [CI: 0.04, 0.06]; SRMR = 0.03. As
hypothesized, mother attachment predicted proactive aggression (direct effect coefcient = −0.11, 95% CI [−0.153,
−0.068]) and reactive aggression (direct effect coefcient = −0.09, 95% CI [−0.139, −0.043]) directly, and indirectly
through perspective taking (indirect effect coefcient = −0.004, 95% CI [−0.006, −0.002] for proactive aggression;
indirect effect coefcient = −0.016, 95% CI [−0.022, −0.010] for reactive aggression). Meanwhile, father attachment
predicted proactive aggression (direct effect coefcient = −0.08, 95% CI [−0.116, −0.036]) and reactive aggression
(direct effect coefcient = −0.15, 95% CI [−0.196, −0.105]) directly, and indirectly through perspective taking (indirect
effect coefcient = −0.002, 95% CI [−0.004, −0.001] for proactive aggression; indirect effect coefcient = −0.009, 95%
CI [−0.015, −0.003] for reactive aggression). Results of chi-square difference test showed again revealed no signicant
Figure 1 The model with standardized estimates is presented. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2 Second model with standardized estimates is presented. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S423270
DovePress
Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2023:16
3442
Li et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

differences in the mediating effect of perspective taking between father attachment and mother attachment (proactive
aggression: χ
2 (1)
= 2.34, p > 0.05; reactive aggression: χ
2 (1)
= 2.55, p > 0.05).
Discussion
The present study investigated the associations between parental attachment and proactive and reactive aggression in Chinese
adolescents, and further uncovered the mediating role of self-control and perspective taking. Results showed that higher
attachment security in adolescents was associated with lower proactive and reactive aggression. Additionally, both self-control
and perspective taking were positively associated with parental attachment and negatively associated with both types of
aggression. Furthermore, parental attachment not only directly predicted proactive and reactive aggression, but also exerted an
indirect effect through self-control and perspective taking. Overall, the present ndings the current study enhances our under-
standing of the complex relationships between parental attachment, self-control, perspective taking, and different types of
aggression in adolescents. The results suggest that secure attachment with parents may serve as a protective factor against various
forms of aggression by fostering better self-control and perspective-taking abilities in adolescents.
Theoretically, the present ndings indicate that attachment security could inhibit aggressive tendencies, and are in
accordance with attachment theory, suggesting that individuals who have positive relationships with parents tend to
develop secure working models and exhibit healthy interpersonal interactions with peers and partners.
14,16
Converging
evidence has indicated that that securely attached adolescents experience less conict with family and peers and
demonstrate a smoother transition to high school than insecurely attached adolescents.
75–77
Similarly, studies have
revealed that adolescent who had a secure attachment were lower in aggressive behaviors compared to those who had
an insecure attachment.
18–20,22
These ndings suggest that attachment security may act as a protective factor for
adolescents’ development of social adaptation and interpersonal relationships.
The present study adds to the existing literature on the relationship between attachment security and aggression by further
highlighting the mediating role of self-control and perspective taking which elucidates the connection between parental
attachment and proactive and reactive aggression. The mediating effect of self-control is in accordance with the self-control
theory, which suggests that effective parenting fosters adolescents’ self-control ability,
28–30,32,33
which then contribute to lower
aggressive tendency.
39,40
Indeed, empirical studies have shown that caring and warm family relationships have positive effects on
self-regulation behaviors among adolescents,
34–36
which in turn are associated with fewer rule-breaking behaviors.
44
On the other hand, the mediating role of perspective taking is in line with the attachment theory, which proposes that the
quality of the parent-child relationship shapes an individual’s social development.
14,16
Individuals who have a secure attachment
with parents are more likely to exhibit greater perspective-taking and empathic concern than their counterparts.
53,54
Although
ndings on the association between perspective taking and aggression were mixed,
64,65
accumulating evidence suggests that
understanding the viewpoint of others facilitates prosocial actions and mitigate aggressive behaviors.
59,62,78–80
Conversely,
children and adolescents who lack perspective taking skills are more likely to display callous-unemotional traits and aggressive
behaviors.
61,63,81
Based on existing evidence, self-control and perspective taking may be important psychological mechanisms
underlying the associations between parental attachment and proactive and reactive aggression. Specically, attachment security
can promote adolescents’ self-regulation and perspective taking, thereby playing a crucial role in reducing aggression.
Several limitations in this study should be acknowledged. First, the recruitment of participants solely from Chinese high
schools, specically from two provinces in the central regions, may limit the generalizability of the present ndings. Future
research should assess this nding in diverse samples encompassing various age groups and countries with different cultural
backgrounds. For instance, one study in Polish adolescents found that attachment to father, but not attachment to mother,
predicted aggressive victimization through self-control.
82
Second, the utilization of a cross-sectional design and self-report
measurements in this study present challenges to establish the causal associations among variables. Multiple forms of
measurement and designs with ecological validity and predictive effect, such as third-party reports (eg, parents, teachers),
experience sampling (eg, daily diary), and longitudinal tracking should be considered in future research.
Conclusions
The present study investigated the relationship between parental attachment and proactive and reactive aggression and
revealed the mediating role of self-control and perspective taking in Chinese adolescents. Attachment security not only
Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2023:16 https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S423270
DovePress
3443
Dovepress Li et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

directly predicted proactive and reactive aggression, but also indirectly predicted both types of aggression through self-
control and perspective taking. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the links between parental attachment
and aggression by revealing its psychological mechanisms and suggesting that secure attachment with parents may
decrease adolescent’s aggression through the promotion of self-control and perspective taking. The current ndings hold
important implications for future research on alleviating aggression through intervention programs focused on fostering
family education and relationships, as well as promoting self-control and perspective taking among adolescents.
Funding
This work was supported by the Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (Central China Normal
University), Ministry of Education (CCNUCYPSYLAB2022B12, CCNUCYPSYLAB2022B08), and National Natural
Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China (2023AFB276).
Disclosure
The authors report no conicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Fite PJ, Raine A, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Loeber R, Pardini DA. Reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent males: examining differential
outcomes 10 years later in early adulthood. Crim Justice Behav. 2010;37(2):141–157. doi:10.1177/0093854809353051
2. Odgers CL, Moftt TE, Broadbent JM, et al. Female and male antisocial trajectories: from childhood origins to adult outcomes. Dev Psychopathol.
2008;20(2):673–716. doi:10.1017/S0954579408000333
3. Raine A, Dodge K, Loeber R, et al. The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in
adolescent boys. Aggress Behav. 2006;32(2):159–171. doi:10.1002/ab.20115
4. Voulgaridou I, Kokkinos CM. Relational aggression in adolescents: a review of theoretical and empirical research. Aggress Violent Behav.
2015;23:87–97. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.006
5. Marsee MA, Frick PJ. Exploring the cognitive and emotional correlates to proactive and reactive aggression in a sample of detained girls. J Abnorm
Child Psychol. 2007;35(6):969–981. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9147-y
6. Romero-Martínez Á, Sarrate-Costa C, Moya-Albiol L. Reactive vs proactive aggression: a differential psychobiological prole? Conclusions
derived from a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;136:104626. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104626
7. Smithmyer CM, Hubbard JA, Simons RF. Proactive and reactive aggression in delinquent adolescents: relations to aggression outcome
expectancies. J Clin Child Psychol. 2000;29(1):86–93. doi:10.1207/S15374424jccp2901_9
8. Vaughan EP, Speck JS, Frick PJ, et al. Proactive and reactive aggression: developmental trajectories and longitudinal associations with callous–
unemotional traits, impulsivity, and internalizing emotions. Dev Psychopathol. 2023:1–9. doi:10.1017/S0954579423000317
9. Allen JP, McElhaney KB, Land DJ, et al. A secure base in adolescence: markers of attachment security in the mother–adolescent relationship. Child
Dev. 2003;74(1):292–307. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00536
10. Buist KL, Deković M, Meeus W, van Aken MAG. The reciprocal relationship between early adolescent attachment and internalizing and
externalizing problem behaviour. J Adolesc. 2004;27(3):251–266. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.11.012
11. Laursen B, Collins WA. Parent-child relationships during adolescence. In: Handbook of Adolescent Psychology: Contextual Inuences on
Adolescent Development. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009:3–42.
12. Bowlby J. Developmental psychiatry comes of age. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145:1–10. doi:10.1176/ajp.145.1.1
13. Ammaniti M, Van Ijzendoorn MH, Speranza AM, Tambelli R. Internal working models of attachment during late childhood and early adolescence:
an exploration of stability and change. Attach Hum Dev. 2000;2(3):328–346. doi:10.1080/14616730010001587
14. Lopez FG, Brennan KA. Dynamic processes underlying adult attachment organization: toward an attachment theoretical perspective on the healthy
and effective self. J Couns Psychol. 2000;47(3):283–300. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.3.283
15. Collins NL. Working models of attachment: implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71(4):810–832.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.810
16. Michiels D, Grietens H, Onghena P, Kuppens S. Parent–child interactions and relational aggression in peer relationships. Dev Rev. 2008;28
(4):522–540. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2008.08.002
17. Buist KL, Deković M, Meeus W, van Aken MAG. Developmental patterns in adolescent attachment to mother, father and sibling. J Youth Adolesc.
2002;31(3):167–176. doi:10.1023/A:1015074701280
18. Bonab BG, Koohsar AAH. Relation among quality of attachment, hostility and interpersonal sensitivity in college students. Procedia.
2011;30:192–196. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.038
19. Grych JH, Kinsfogel KM. Exploring the role of attachment style in the relation between family aggression and abuse in adolescent dating
relationships. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2010;19(6):624–640. doi:10.1080/10926771.2010.502068
20. Hare AL, Miga EM, Allen JP. Intergenerational transmission of aggression in romantic relationships: the moderating role of attachment security.
J Fam Psychol. 2009;23(6):808–818. doi:10.1037/a0016740
21. Kokkinos CM, Algiovanoglou I, Voulgaridou I. Emotion regulation and relational aggression in adolescents: parental attachment as moderator.
J Child Fam Stud. 2019;28(11):3146–3160. doi:10.1007/s10826-019-01491-9
22. Savage J. The association between attachment, parental bonds and physically aggressive and violent behavior: a comprehensive review. Aggress
Violent Behav. 2014;19(2):164–178. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.02.004
https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S423270
DovePress
Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2023:16
3444
Li et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

23. Cyr M, Pasalich DS, McMahon RJ, Spieker SJ. The longitudinal link between parenting and child aggression: the moderating effect of attachment
security. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2014;45(5):555–564. doi:10.1007/s10578-013-0424-4
24. Li J-B, Guo Y-J, Delvecchio E, Mazzeschi C. Chinese adolescents’ psychosocial adjustment: the contribution of mothers’ attachment style and
adolescents’ attachment to mother. J Soc Pers Relat. 2020;37(8–9):2597–2619. doi:10.1177/0265407520932667
25. Zhang R, Wang L-X, Datu JAD, et al. High Qualities of relationships with parents and teachers contribute to the development of adolescent life satisfaction
through resilience: a three-wave prospective longitudinal study. J Happiness Stud. 2023;24(4):1339–1365. doi:10.1007/s10902-023-00647-1
26. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Tice DM. The strength model of self-control. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(6):351–355. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x
27. Inzlicht M, Werner KM, Briskin JL, Roberts BW. Integrating models of self-regulation. Ann Rev Psychol. 2021;72(1):319–345. doi:10.1146/
annurev-psych-061020-105721
28. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T. A General Theory of Crime. Redwood City: Stanford University Press; 1990.
29. Altenburger LE, Schoppe-Sullivan SJ. Contributions of parenting quality and coparenting relationship quality to the development of child executive
functioning. Early Child Res Q. 2021;57:133–143. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.05.010
30. Burt CH, Simons RL, Simons LG. A longitudinal test of the effects of parenting and the stability of self-control: negative evidence for the general
theory of crime. Criminology. 2006;44(2):353–396. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00052.x
31. Heylen J, Vasey MW, Dujardin A, et al. Attachment and effortful control: relationships with maladjustment in early adolescence. J Early Adolesc.
2015;37(3):289–315. doi:10.1177/0272431615599063
32. Sosic-Vasic Z, Kröner J, Schneider S, Vasic N, Spitzer M, Streb J. The association between parenting behavior and executive functioning in
children and young adolescents. Front Psychol. 2017;8:472. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00472
33. Valcan DS, Davis H, Pino-Pasternak D. Parental behaviours predicting early childhood executive functions: a meta-analysis. Educ Psychol Rev.
2018;30(3):607–649. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9411-9
34. Farley JP, Kim-Spoon J. The development of adolescent self-regulation: reviewing the role of parent, peer, friend, and romantic relationships.
J Adolesc. 2014;37(4):433–440. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.009
35. Li JB, Willems YE, Stok FM, Deković M, Bartels M, Finkenauer C. Parenting and self-control across early to late adolescence: a three-level
meta-analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019;14(6):967–1005. doi:10.1177/1745691619863046
36. Moilanen KL, Shaw DS, Fitzpatrick A. Self-regulation in early adolescence: relations with mother–son relationship quality and maternal regulatory
support and antagonism. J Youth Adolesc. 2010;39(11):1357–1367. doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9485-x
37. Halse M, Steinsbekk S, Hammar Å, Belsky J, Wichstrøm L. Parental predictors of children’s executive functioning from ages 6 to 10. Br J Dev
Psychol. 2019;37(3):410–426. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12282
38. Lam CB, Chung KKH, Li X. Parental warmth and hostility and child executive function problems: a longitudinal study of Chinese families. Front
Psychol. 2018;9:1063. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01063
39. Denson TF, DeWall CN, Finkel EJ. Self-control and aggression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21(1):20–25. doi:10.1177/0963721411429451
40. DeWall CN, Finkel EJ, Denson TF. Self-control inhibits aggression. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2011;5(7):458–472. doi:10.1111/j.1751-
9004.2011.00363.x
41. Li JB, Delvecchio E, Lis A, Nie YG, Di Riso D. Positive coping as mediator between self-control and life satisfaction: evidence from two Chinese
samples. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;97:130–133. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.042
42. Nie YG, Li JB, Vazsonyi AT. Self-control mediates the associations between parental attachment and prosocial behavior among Chinese
adolescents. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;96:36–39. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.077
43. Li JB, Dou K, Situ QM, Salcuni S, Wang Y-J, Friese M. Anger rumination partly accounts for the association between trait self-control and
aggression. J Res Pers. 2019;81:207–223. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2019.06.011
44. Sun Y, Li JB, Oktauk MPM, Vazsonyi AT. Parental attachment and externalizing behaviors among Chinese adolescents: the mediating role of
self-control. J Child Fam Stud. 2022;31(4):923–933. doi:10.1007/s10826-021-02071-6
45. Liu F, Chui H, Chung MC. The effect of parent–adolescent relationship quality on deviant peer afliation: the mediating role of self-control and
friendship quality. J Soc Pers Relat. 2020;37(10–11):2714–2736. doi:10.1177/0265407520937358
46. Özdemir Y, Vazsonyi AT, Çok F. Parenting processes and aggression: the role of self-control among Turkish adolescents. J Adolesc. 2013;36
(1):65–77. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.09.004
47. Mancinelli E, Liberska HD, J-B L, et al. A cross-cultural study on attachment and adjustment difculties in adolescence: the mediating role of
self-control in Italy, Spain, China, and Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8827. doi:10.3390/ijerph18168827
48. Anderson C, Keltner D. The role of empathy in the formation and maintenance of social bonds. Behav Brain Sci. 2002;25(1):21–22. doi:10.1080/
14616730010001587
49. Blair RJR. Responding to the emotions of others: dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Conscious
Cogn. 2005;14(4):698–718. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.004
50. Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44:113–126.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
51. Decety J, Svetlova M. Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012;2(1):1–24. doi:10.1016/j.
dcn.2011.05.003
52. Batanova MD, Loukas A. What are the unique and interacting contributions of school and family factors to early adolescents’ empathic concern and
perspective taking? J Youth Adolesc. 2012;41(10):1382–1391. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9768-5
53. Henschel S, Nandrino J-L, Pezard L, Ott L, Vulliez-Coady L, Doba K. The inuence of attachment styles on autonomic correlates of
perspective-taking. Biol Psychol. 2020;154:107908. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107908
54. Laghi F, D’Alessio M, Pallini S, Baiocco R. Attachment representations and time perspective in adolescence. Soc Indic Res. 2009;90(2):181–194.
doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9249-0
55. Wei M, Liao KY, Ku TY, Shaffer PA. Attachment, self-compassion, empathy, and subjective well-being among college students and community
adults. J Pers. 2011;79(1):191–221. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00677.x
56. Taubner S, White LO, Zimmermann J, Fonagy P, Nolte T. Attachment-related mentalization moderates the relationship between psychopathic traits
and proactive aggression in adolescence. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013;41(6):929–938. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9736-x
Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2023:16 https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S423270
DovePress
3445
Dovepress Li et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

57. Gómez-Leal R, Megías-Robles A, Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ, Cabello R, Fernández-Berrocal P. Personal risk and protective factors involved in aggressive
behavior. J Interpers Violence. 2020;37(3–4):1489–1515. doi:10.1177/0886260520926322
58. Loudin JL, Loukas A, Robinson S. Relational aggression in college students: examining the roles of social anxiety and empathy. Aggress Behav.
2003;29(5):430–439. doi:10.1002/ab.10039
59. Carlo G, Mestre MV, Samper P, Tur A, Armenta BE. Feelings or cognitions? Moral cognitions and emotions as longitudinal predictors of prosocial
and aggressive behaviors. Pers Individ Dif. 2010;48(8):872–877. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.010
60. Jolliffe D, Farrington DP. Is low empathy related to bullying after controlling for individual and social background variables? J Adolesc. 2011;34
(1):59–71. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.02.001
61. Carlo G, Mestre MV, Samper P, Tur A, Armenta BE. The longitudinal relations among dimensions of parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral
reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. Int J Behav Dev. 2010;35(2):116–124. doi:10.1177/016502541037592
62. Li X, Bian C, Chen Y, et al. Indirect aggression and parental attachment in early adolescence: examining the role of perspective taking and
empathetic concern. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;86:499–503. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.008
63. Pan Y, Liang S, Shek DTL. Attachment insecurity and altruistic behavior among Chinese adolescents: mediating effect of different dimensions of
empathy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16). doi:10.3390/ijerph191610371
64. Jolliffe D, Farrington DP. Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggress Behav. 2006;32(6):540–550. doi:10.1002/ab.20154
65. Batanova MD, Loukas A. Social anxiety and aggression in early adolescents: examining the moderating roles of empathic concern and perspective
taking. J Youth Adolesc. 2011;40(11):1534–1543. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9634-x
66. Cillessen AHN, Borch C. Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: a growth curve modelling analysis. J Adolesc. 2006;29(6):935–959.
doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.05.005
67. Armsden GC, Greenberg MT. The inventory of parent and peer attachment: individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being
in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 1987;16(5):427–454. doi:10.1007/BF02202939
68. Li JB, Delvecchio E, Miconi D, Salcuni S, Di Riso D. Parental attachment among Chinese, Italian, and Costa Rican adolescents: a cross-cultural
study. Pers Individ Dif. 2014;71:118–123. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.036
69. Teng Z, Grifths MD, Nie Q, Xiang G, Guo C. Parent–adolescent attachment and peer attachment associated with internet gaming disorder:
a longitudinal study of rst-year undergraduate students. J Behav Addict. 2020;9(1):116–128. doi:10.1556/2006.2020.00011
70. Fung AL, Raine A, Gao Y. Cross-cultural generalizability of the Reactive–Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ). J Pers Assess. 2009;91
(5):473–479. doi:10.1080/00223890903088420
71. Xu Y, Raine A, Yu L, Krieg A. Resting heart rate, vagal tone, and reactive and proactive aggression in Chinese children. J Abnorm Child Psychol.
2014;42(3):501–514. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9792-2
72. Li Q, Xiang G, Song S, Huang X, Chen H. Examining the associations of trait self-control with hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. J Happiness
Stud. 2021;23(2):667–687. doi:10.1007/s10902-021-00418-w
73. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers.
2004;72(2):271–324. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
74. Lt H, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for t indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling.
1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
75. Ducharme J, Doyle AB, Markiewicz D. Attachment security with mother and father: associations with adolescents’ reports of interpersonal
behavior with parents and peers. J Soc Pers Relat. 2002;19(2):203–231. doi:10.1177/0265407502192003
76. Duchesne S, Ratelle CF, Poitras S-C, Drouin E. Early adolescent attachment to parents, emotional problems, and teacher-academic worries about
the middle school transition. J Early Adolesc. 2009;29(5):743–766. doi:10.1177/0272431608325502
77. Laible D. Attachment with parents and peers in late adolescence: links with emotional competence and social behavior. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;43
(5):1185–1197. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.010
78. Song P, Zhang Z, Wang B, et al. The inuence of trait empathy on reactive aggression: an ERP study. Int J Psychophysiol. 2018;133:102–110.
doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.08.002
79. Tamnes CK, Overbye K, Ferschmann L, et al. Social perspective taking is associated with self-reported prosocial behavior and regional cortical
thickness across adolescence. Dev Psychol. 2018;54(9):1745–1757. doi:10.1037/dev0000541
80. van Hazebroek BCM, Olthof T, Goossens FA. Predicting aggression in adolescence: the interrelation between (a lack of) empathy and social goals.
Aggress Behav. 2017;43(2):204–214. doi:10.1002/ab.21675
81. van der Zouwen M, Hoeve M, Hendriks AM, Asscher JJ, Stams GJJM. The association between attachment and psychopathic traits. Aggress
Violent Behav. 2018;43:45–55. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.09.002
82. Li JB, Liberska H, Salcuni S, Delvecchio E. Aggressive perpetration and victimization among Polish male and female adolescents: the role of
attachment to parents and self-control. Crime Delinq. 2018;65(3):401–421. doi:10.1177/0011128718787472
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Dovepress
Publish your work in this journal
Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and
its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specic topics
covered in the journal include: Neuroscience, memory and decision making; Behavior modication and management; Clinical applications; Business
and sports performance management; Social and developmental studies; Animal studies. The manuscript management system is completely online
and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes
from published authors.
Submit your manuscript here: https://www.dovepress.com/psychology-research-and-behavior-management-journal
DovePress Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2023:16
3446
Li et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)