A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from International Journal of Legal Medicine
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
International Journal of Legal Medicine (2023) 137:1505–1514
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03030-0
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Age estimation ininfant andprenatal individuals throughthemetric
development ofthepars petrosa andsquamosal portion
ofthetemporal bone
ErikA.BorjaMiranda1 · ManuelPartidoNavadijo1 · InmaculadaAlemánAguilera1 · JavierIruritaOlivares1
Received: 10 February 2023 / Accepted: 22 May 2023 / Published online: 8 June 2023
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023
Abstract
This study proposes an assessment of the accuracy of the Fazekas and Kósa and Nagaoka methods by measuring the squa-
mosal and petrous portions of the temporal bone, whose application in the Mediterranean population is not recommended.
Therefore, our proposal is a new formula to estimate the age of skeletal remains from individuals at 5 months gestational
age to 1.5 postnatal years with the temporal bone. The proposed equation was calculated on a Mediterranean sample identi-
fied from the cemetery of San José, Granada (n = 109). The mathematical model used is the exponential regression of the
estimated age for each measure and sex, and both in combination, using an inverse calibration and cross-validation model.
In addition, the estimation errors and the percentage of individuals within a 95% confidence interval were calculated. The
lateral development of the skull, especially the growth of the length of the petrous portion, showed the greatest accuracy,
while its counterpart, the width of the pars petrosa, showed the lowest accuracy, so its use is discouraged. The positive results
from this paper should be useful in both forensic and bioarchaeological contexts.
Keywords Age estimation· Forensic anthropology· Non-adults individuals· Temporal bone· Regression analysis
Introduction
The development of methods to estimate the age of indi-
viduals represents a considerable part of the physical and
forensic anthropology literature, because the identification
of human skeletal remains is one of the basic aspects of the
subject of the field [1]. In the case of infant skeletal remains,
the constant development, growth, and maturation of the
skeleton and teeth make it possible to estimate the age at
death with a high degree of reliability [2, 3]. That is why
the length of the long bones and dental development and
eruption have usually been employed to estimate the age of
infant individuals [4–6].
Most of the current methods used to estimate the age
of non-adult individuals are far from following the recom-
mendations of the scientific community for publication in
terms of sample size, reliability, and error estimation, among
other factors [7]. While these approaches offer a substantial
amount of information regarding the growth and develop-
ment of individual skeletal elements, it is essential that the
new methods proposed by researchers are not only more
precise in their mathematical expression, but also easier to
use by the anthropologist [8].
The development of the skull as a criterion for age esti-
mation in non-adult individuals is quite useful especially in
early childhood, given the large number of bones in the cra-
nial structure and their different stages of fusion. The fetal
growth of the temporal bone was described by Anson [9] and
has been used to estimate age in several studies [10–15]. The
lateral region of the temporal bone, including the squamous
portion, shows very rapid growth between birth and 4 years
of age. Although it continues to grow until approximately
20 years of age, this development is drastically reduced with
respect to the first years of life [16]. Another favorable aspect
INFO: The main author is under 35; as indicated in the “Supporting
Junior Scientists” section, I communicated this to the editors’
council.
* Erik A. Borja Miranda
erikborm@gmail.com
1 Laboratory ofAnthropology, Department ofLegal Medicine,
Toxicology andPhysical Anthropology, University
ofGranada, Avda. de la Investigación, 11, 18006Granada,
Spain
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.