ArticlePDF Available

Subsequent pregnancy outcomes among women with tubal ectopic pregnancy treated with methotrexate

Authors:

Abstract

Lay summary An ectopic pregnancy occurs when an embryo implants outside of the uterus, usually in a fallopian tube. When detected early, treatment is often with a medication called methotrexate. When methotrexate does not work, surgery is required. A recent clinical trial of ectopic pregnancy treatment (called GEM3) found that adding a drug called gefitinib to methotrexate did not reduce the need for surgery. We have used data from the GEM3 trial, combined with data collected 12 months after the trial finished, to investigate post-methotrexate pregnancy outcomes. We found no difference in pregnancy rates, pregnancy loss rates and recurrent ectopic pregnancy rates between those treated medically only and those who subsequently also needed surgery. The surgical technique used also did not affect pregnancy rates. This research provides reassurance that women with ectopic pregnancies treated medically who need surgery have similar post-treatment pregnancy outcomes to those treated successfully medically.
S C Mackenzie etal. 4:2 e230019
RESEARCH LETTER
Subsequent pregnancy outcomes among
women with tubal ectopic pregnancy treated
with methotrexate
ScottC Mackenzie 1, CatherineA Moakes2, WColin Duncan 1, Stephen Tong3 and AndrewW Horne 1
1MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
2Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Correspondence should be addressed to A W Horne: andrew.horne@ed.ac.uk
Graphical abstract
Lay summary
An ectopic pregnancy occurs when an embryo implants outside of the uterus, usually in a fallopian tube. When detected
early, treatment is often with a medication called methotrexate. When methotrexate does not work, surgery is required. A
recent clinical trial of ectopic pregnancy treatment (called GEM3) found that adding a drug called getinib to methotrexate
did not reduce the need for surgery. We have used data from the GEM3 trial, combined with data collected 12 months
after the trial nished, to investigate post-methotrexate pregnancy outcomes. We found no dierence in pregnancy
rates, pregnancy loss rates and recurrent ectopic pregnancy rates between those treated medically only and those who
subsequently also needed surgery. The surgical technique used also did not aect pregnancy rates. This research provides
-23-0019
ID: XX-XXXX;
42230019
230019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://raf.bioscientica.com © 2023 the author(s)
Published by Bioscientica Ltd
https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-23-0019
Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 06/16/2023 07:52:30AM
via free access
S C Mackenzie etal. 4:2 e230019
reassurance that women with ectopic pregnancies treated medically who need surgery have similar post-treatment
pregnancy outcomes to those treated successfully medically.
Keywords: tubal ectopic pregnancy   methotrexate   pregnancy outcomes   recurrence   risk factor
Reproduction and Fertility (2023) 4 e230019
Research letter
Pre-treatment counselling for women with unruptured
tubal ectopic pregnancies considering their treatment
options requires the provision of information on post-
treatment pregnancy outcomes, including rates of ectopic
pregnancy recurrence. Current UK NICE early pregnancy
guidelines are based on low-quality evidence and estimate
the long-term ectopic pregnancy recurrence rate at
~18.5% (NICE 2021). Further, they relay findings showing
no dierences in rates of subsequent pregnancy or ectopic
pregnancy recurrence between management methods (de
Bennetot etal. 2012, Fernandez etal. 2013 , Park etal. 2017 ).
Approximately 30% of women with a scan-diagnosed
ectopic pregnancy actively managed with methotrexate
experience treatment failure and require rescue surgery,
and little is known about subsequent pregnancy outcomes
in this group.
We describe subsequent pregnancy outcomes
in women with tubal ectopic pregnancy managed
with methotrexate using data from a UK multicentre
randomised controlled trial comparing methotrexate and
gefitinib vs methotrexate and placebo for the treatment of
tubal ectopic pregnancy (GEM3: Horne etal. 2023). Trial
participants were women with an ultrasound diagnosed
definite (or probable) tubal ectopic pregnancy with pre-
treatment serum hCG levels of 1000 IU/L and 5000
IU/L. The trial found adding gefitinib to methotrexate was
not superior to placebo. After randomisation to treatment,
trial participants were contacted at 12 months to provide
subsequent pregnancy outcome data. Where telephone
contact was unsuccessful, electronic health records were
reviewed. Post-treatment pregnancy outcomes were
summarised with descriptive statistics and the groups
were compared using chi-squared tests.
Subsequent pregnancy outcome data were obtained
for 283/327 trial participants (167 contacted by telephone;
116 from electronic health records). Follow-up data from
both randomisation groups (methotrexate and gefitinib;
methotrexate and placebo) were combined owing to
no between-group dierences in subsequent pregnancy
outcomes (Supplementary Table 1, see section on
supplementary materials given at the end of this article).
Pregnancy occurred in 53% (149/283) of participants in
the 12-month follow-up period. There was no dierence
in subsequent pregnancy rates between ‘medical
management only’ and ‘medical management and rescue
surgery’ groups (Table 1). Surgical approach to ectopic
pregnancy treatment (salpingectomy vs salpingotomy)
did not aect subsequent pregnancy rates. Among women
who had a pregnancy within the follow-up period, a
live birth occurred in 65% (93/142), any pregnancy
Table 1 Pregnancy rates and subsequent pregnancy outcomes among women with tubal ectopic pregnancy treated medically.
Data are presented as n or as n (%).
MM + RS
MM only
P-value*
Salpingectomy Salpingotomy All
n86 11 97 228
Any pregnancy post-treatment 37 (51) 4 (50) 41 (51) 108 (53) 0.66
 Missing 13 3 16 26
Any live birth post-treatment20 (61) 3 (75) 23 (62) 70 (67) 0.62
 Missing 404 3
Any pregnancy loss post-treatment†,‡ 16 (52) 1 (25) 17 (49) 38 (38) 0.26
 Missing 6067
Any ectopic pregnancy post-treatment6 (22) 0 (-) 6 (19) 16 (16) 0.66
 Missing 10 0 10 8
*Medical management and rescue surgery vs medical management only; Only in women whom have had a pregnancy post-treatment; Dened as
miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth or molar pregnancy (excluding termination of pregnancy).
MM, medical management; RS, rescue surgery.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-23-0019
https://raf.bioscientica.com © 2023 the author(s)
Published by Bioscientica Ltd
Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 06/16/2023 07:52:30AM
via free access
S C Mackenzie etal. 4:2 e230019
loss occurred in 40% (55/136) and recurrent ectopic
pregnancy occurred in 17% (22/131). No dierence was
observed in the rates of live birth, pregnancy loss or
recurrent ectopic pregnancy between treatment groups or
between those who had salpingectomy vs salpingotomy.
Participant characteristics (body mass index, chlamydial
infection history and smoking status) were investigated
for association with recurrent ectopic pregnancy using
univariate and multivariate log-binomial models. No
significant associations were identified; however, this
analysis was limited by the small sample of women in
which ectopic pregnancy occurrence recurred. Similarly,
the power to detect dierences in subsequent pregnancy
outcomes between treatment groups was limited owing
to the small sample sizes in observed groups. Intention to
conceive in the follow-up period was not recorded and we
were therefore unable to stratify results accordingly.
This prospective dataset strengthens current
knowledge of the likelihood of ectopic pregnancy
recurrence. Furthermore, it provides reassurance that
women with tubal ectopic pregnancy who required
rescue surgery following medical treatment have similar
outcomes in their subsequent pregnancy as those with
successful medical treatment alone. However, this study
only reports on a 12-month follow-up period, which
should be considered when interpreting the comparatively
low post-treatment pregnancy rates (Fernandez etal. 2013 ).
Supplementary materials
This is linked to the online version of the paper at https://doi.org/10.1530/
RAF-23-0019.
Declaration of interest
AWH is a Co-Editor-in-Chief and WCD is an Associate Editor of Reproduction
& Fertility. AWH and WCD were not involved in the review or editorial
process for this paper, on which they are listed as authors. AWH has
received honoraria for consultancy for Ferring, Roche Diagnostics, Nordic
Pharma, Gesynta and Abbvie. WCD has received honoraria from Merck
and Guerbet, and research funding from Galvani Biosciences. The other
authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
This project was supported by funding from the Ecacy and Mechanism
Evaluation programme, a Medical Research Council and National Institute
for Health Research partnership (grant reference number 14/150/03).
Trial registration number
This study is a follow-up analysis of participants from the GEM3 trial
(ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN67795930).
Author contribution statement
SCM drafted the manuscript. CAM analysed the data. All authors reviewed
and contributed to the nal manuscript.
References
de BennetotM, RabischongB, Aublet-CuvelierB, BelardF,
FernandezH, BouyerJ, CanisM & PoulyJL 2012 Fertility
after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study.
Fertility and Sterility 98 1271–6.e1. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
fertnstert.2012.06.041)
FernandezH, CapmasP, LucotJP, ReschB, PanelP, BouyerJ
& GROG 2013 Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER
randomized trial. Human Reproduction 28 1247–1253. (https://doi.
org/10.1093/humrep/det037)
HorneAW, TongS, MoakesCA, MiddletonLJ, DuncanWC,
MolBW, WhitakerLHR, JurkovicD, CoomarasamyA,
NunesN, etal. 2023 Combination of gefitinib and methotrexate to
treat tubal ectopic pregnancy (GEM3): a multicentre, randomised,
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 401 655–663. (https://
doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02478-3)
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Ectopic pregnancy:
scenario: follow up after an ectopic pregnancy 2021. Available at:
https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/ectopic-pregnancy/management/follow-
up-after-an-ectopic-pregnancy/ (Accessed Mar 15th 2023).
ParkEHG, Mohammadi-ZanianiG, ProninS, ElderfieldCHJ &
DuncanWC 2017 Subsequent pregnancy outcome of tubal ectopic
pregnancies treated by methotrexate and salpingectomy. European
Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 212 192–193.
(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.02.018)
Received 15 March 2023
Accepted 30 May 2023
Available online 30 May 2023
Version of Record published 15 June 2023
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-23-0019
https://raf.bioscientica.com © 2023 the author(s)
Published by Bioscientica Ltd
Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 06/16/2023 07:52:30AM
via free access
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Study question Is a combination of parenteral methotrexate and oral gefitinib more effective than methotrexate alone in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy? Summary answer In women with a tubal ectopic pregnancy, adding oral gefitinib to parental methotrexate does not offer clinical benefit over methotrexate and increases minor adverse reactions. What is known already Current treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancies is with methotrexate or surgery. Methotrexate treatment fails in ∼30% of women and they require rescue surgery. At the time of the design of the trial, it had been shown in preclinical studies that tubal implantation sites express high levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and that gefitinib (an EGFR antagonist) augments methotrexate-induced regression of pregnancy-like tissue. There was also evidence from uncontrolled phase I and II trials that raised the possibility that combination methotrexate and gefitinib could be a more effective medical treatment than methotrexate alone to treat stable ectopic pregnancies. Study design, size, duration Between 2nd November 2016 and 6th October 2021, we performed a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across 50 UK hospitals. Eligible participants were women with a tubal ectopic pregnancy deemed suitable for medical management with methotrexate. Inclusion criteria were: aged 18-50 years; pre-treatment serum hCG level of 1000–5000 IU/L; and either a definite diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy or a clinical judgement of ‘probable’ tubal ectopic pregnancy. Participants/materials, setting, methods Participants were administered a single dose of intramuscular methotrexate (50 mg/m2) and randomised (1:1 ratio) to seven days of additional oral gefitinib (250mg daily) or placebo. The primary outcome, analysed by intention to treat, was surgical intervention to resolve the ectopic pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included time to resolution of ectopic pregnancy and serious adverse events. Main results and the role of chance 328 participants were allocated to methotrexate and gefitinib (n = 165) or methotrexate and placebo (n = 163). Three participants in the placebo group withdrew. Surgical intervention occurred in 30% (50/165) of the gefitinib group and in 29% (47/160) of the placebo group (adjusted risk ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.58; adjusted risk difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.10-0.09; p = 0.37). Without surgical intervention, median time to resolution was 28.0 days in the gefitinib group and 28.0 days in the placebo group (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.75-1.40). Serious adverse events occurred in 3% (5/165) of the gefitinib group and in 4% (6/162) of the placebo group. Diarrhoea and rash were more common in the gefitinib group. Limitations, reasons for caution Limitations of the trial include the fact that we only tested one dose regimen. It is possible gefitinib may be effective if a different protocol were used, such as a longer period of administration. Also, we did not carry out pharmacodynamic studies to determine optimal drug bioavailability. Wider implications of the findings Our results show that the addition of gefitinib to standard medical management with methotrexate to treat tubal ectopic pregnancy is not clinically effective as it does not reduce subsequent surgical intervention and is associated with higher rates of reported symptoms than placebo. Trial registration number ISRCTN67795930
Article
Background: Tubal ectopic pregnancies can cause substantial morbidity or even death. Current treatment is with methotrexate or surgery. Methotrexate treatment fails in approximately 30% of women who subsequently require rescue surgery. Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, might improve the effects of methotrexate. We assessed the efficacy of oral gefitinib with methotrexate, versus methotrexate alone, to treat tubal ectopic pregnancy. Methods: We performed a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across 50 UK hospitals. Participants diagnosed with tubal ectopic pregnancy were administered a single dose of intramuscular methotrexate (50 mg/m2) and randomised (1:1 ratio) to 7 days of additional oral gefitinib (250 mg daily) or placebo. The primary outcome, analysed by intention to treat, was surgical intervention to resolve the ectopic pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included time to resolution of ectopic pregnancy and serious adverse events. This trial is registered at the ISRCTN registry, ISCRTN 67795930. Findings: Between Nov 2, 2016, and Oct 6, 2021, 328 participants were allocated to methotrexate and gefitinib (n=165) or methotrexate and placebo (n=163). Three participants in the placebo group withdrew. Surgical intervention occurred in 50 (30%) of 165 participants in the gefitinib group and in 47 (29%) of 160 participants in the placebo group (adjusted risk ratio 1·15, 95% CI 0·85 to 1·58; adjusted risk difference -0·01, 95% CI -0·10 to 0·09; p=0·37). Without surgical intervention, median time to resolution was 28·0 days in the gefitinib group and 28·0 days in the placebo group (subdistribution hazard ratio 1·03, 95% CI 0·75 to 1·40). Serious adverse events occurred in five (3%) of 165 participants in the gefitinib group and in six (4%) of 162 participants in the placebo group. Diarrhoea and rash were more common in the gefitinib group. Interpretation: In women with a tubal ectopic pregnancy, adding oral gefitinib to parenteral methotrexate does not offer clinical benefit over methotrexate and increases minor adverse reactions. Funding: National Institute of Health Research.
Article
STUDY QUESTION Does treatment for the resolution of ectopic pregnancy (EP) affect subsequent spontaneous fertility [occurrence of an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP)]? SUMMARY ANSWER There is no significant difference in 2 years subsequent fertility neither between methotrexate and conservative surgery for less active EP nor between conservative and radical surgery for the most active EP. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY No randomized trial has compared radical and conservative surgery treatments. A recent review of the Cochrane database did not conclude about fertility due to insufficient data. Prospective studies from EP registries in two regions of France (Auvergne and Greater Lille) have suggested that fertility is similar after medical treatment and conservative surgery and lower after radical surgery. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This randomized controlled trial included all women with an ultrasound-confirmed EP. Women were divided into two arms according to the activity of the EP (defined by Fernandez's score). In arm 1 (less active ectopic pregnancies, i.e. Fernandez's score
Article
To assess the reproductive outcome after an ectopic pregnancy (EP) based on the type of treatment used, and to identify predictive factors of spontaneous fertility. Observational population based-study. Regional sistry. One thousand sixty-four women registered from 1992 to 2008. Laparoscopic (radical or conservative), or medical treatment. Epidemiologic characteristics, clinical presentation, treatments performed, reproductive outcome, recurrence. The 24-month cumulative rate of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) was 67% after salpingectomy, 76% after salpingostomy, and 76% after medical treatment. IUP rate was lower after radical treatment compared with conservative treatments in univariable analysis. In multivariate analysis, IUP rate was significantly lower for patients >35 years old or with history of infertility or tubal disease. For them, IUP rate was significantly higher after conservative treatment compared with salpingectomy. The 2-year cumulative rate of recurrences was 18.5% after salpingostomy or salpingectomy and 25.5% after medical treatment. History of infertility or of previous live birth would be protective, in contrast to history of voluntary termination of pregnancy. Conservative strategy seems to be preferred, whenever possible, to preserve patients' fertility without increasing the risk of recurrence. The choice between conservative treatments does not rely on subsequent fertility, but more likely on their own indications and therapeutic effectiveness. Risk factors of recurrence could be considered for secondary prevention.