ArticlePDF Available

Lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) method in irreversible dental pulp changes of primary teeth

Authors:
  • Faculty of Dentistry with Clinical Dental Center of Sarajevo University

Abstract and Figures

Background/Aim: Deep carious lesions on primary teeth usually have been causing infectious dental pulp changes. If indicated, traditional endodontic root canal treatment for these kinds of pulpal infections in primary teeth usually should involve the performing of pulpectomy methods, but often with questionable prognosis. The lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) approach is one of the good endodontic therapeutic alternatives for affected primary teeth with a poor prognosis, which could otherwise be condemned to premature extraction. Aim was to evaluate the medium-term clinical success in everyday practice of the LSTR method applied in affected primary teeth with irreversible pulpal tissue infections by observation of reduction/absence of their clinical symptoms. Material and methods: The study sample included child patients who had one or more of their affected primary molars with irreversible pulpal tissue changes of poor prognosis treated with the LSTR method. For each patient whose primary molar tooth was endodontically treated with the LSTR method a clinical evaluation of treated tooth was performed at intervals of 1 and 12 months afterwards. Results: Study sample was consisted of 40 child patients aged 4 to 9 years, with 45 primary molars included in total. It was obvious that the symptoms related to affected sample teeth have already been decreased almost immediately after initial action of triple antibiotic paste. Final outcome after 12-months follow-up period was success of applied LSTR method in 43 (95.6%) affected sample teeth in a way that initial clinical symptoms completely decreased and disappeared. Conclusions: LSTR method has been shown as successful pulpotomy technique for noninstrumental endodontic approach in non-vital pulp treatment of primary molar teeth in a 12-months follow-up period.
Content may be subject to copyright.
SUMMARY
Background/Aim: Deep carious lesions on primary teeth usually
have been causing infectious dental pulp changes. If indicated, traditional
endodontic root canal treatment for these kinds of pulpal infections
in primary teeth usually should involve the performing of pulpectomy
methods, but often with questionable prognosis. The lesion sterilization and
tissue repair (LSTR) approach is one of the good endodontic therapeutic
alternatives for affected primary teeth with a poor prognosis, which could
otherwise be condemned to premature extraction. Aim was to evaluate the
medium-term clinical success in everyday practice of the LSTR method
applied in affected primary teeth with irreversible pulpal tissue infections by
observation of reduction/absence of their clinical symptoms. Material and
methods: The study sample included child patients who had one or more
of their affected primary molars with irreversible pulpal tissue changes
of poor prognosis treated with the LSTR method. For each patient whose
primary molar tooth was endodontically treated with the LSTR method a
clinical evaluation of treated tooth was performed at intervals of 1 and 12
months afterwards. Results: Study sample was consisted of 40 child patients
aged 4 to 9 years, with 45 primary molars included in total. It was obvious
that the symptoms related to affected sample teeth have already been
decreased almost immediately after initial action of triple antibiotic paste.
Final outcome after 12-months follow-up period was success of applied
LSTR method in 43 (95.6%) affected sample teeth in a way that initial
clinical symptoms completely decreased and disappeared. Conclusions:
LSTR method has been shown as successful pulpotomy technique for non-
instrumental endodontic approach in non-vital pulp treatment of primary
molar teeth in a 12-months follow-up period.
Keywords: Paediatric Dentistry, Endodontics, Primary Teeth, LSTR
Amila Zukanović1, Elmedin Bajrić1, Nina
Marković1, Damir Duratbegović2, Elma
Katana2, Emina Čengić2, Senka Serhatlić2,
Hasan Pejak2
1 Department for Preventive Dentistry and
Pedodontics, Faculty od Dentistry with Clinics,
University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 Clinic for Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry,
Faculty od Dentistry with Clinics, University of
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
ORIGINAL PAPER (OP)
Balk J Dent Med, 2023;15-20
BALKAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE
ISSN 2335-0245
Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair (LSTR)
Method in Irreversible Dental Pulp Changes of
Primary Teeth
S
T
O
M
A
T
O
L
O
G
I
C
A
L
S
O
C
I
E
T
Y
Introduction
Deep carious lesions on primary teeth usually have
been causing infectious dental pulp changes, due to
thinner and more permeable mineralized dentine tissue,
and weaker defensive potential of its dentin-pulp complex
as well. The most common diagnoses of dental pulp
diseases included purulent, necrotic, chronic hypertrophic
and/or gangrenous forms1-5.
If indicated, traditional endodontic root canal
treatment for these kinds of pulpal infections in
primary teeth usually should involve the performing
of pulpectomy methods, but often with questionable
prognosis. Furthermore, cooperation in child patients
has often been absent, which usually made it impossible
to perform these kinds of more demanding endodontic
treatments in dental office. So, it often happens that the
indicated procedures were abandoned and premature
extraction was only possible therapeutic choice in
everyday practice. Furthermore, the extractions by
10.5937/bjdm2301015Z
16 Amila Zukanović et al. Balk J Dent Med, Vol 27, 2023
of Sarajevo, and conducted according to the Helsinki
Declaration28. Informed consent was requested from the
parents of the minor respondents, and the content of the
study was briefly explained to the child patients and their
parent’s prior conduction of the study research.
Clinical sample
The study sample included child patients, who
visited the Clinic for Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry
of the Faculty of Dentistry with Clinics of the University
of Sarajevo, who had one or more of their affected
primary molars with irreversible pulpal tissue changes
treated with the LSTR method in the period from October
2020 until June 2021. Child patients had to be of good
general health without diagnosed chronic systemic
diseases, and also without diagnoses of allergies of any
kind to the materials or medicals used for LSTR method.
The method was performed on affected teeth following
clinical diagnoses of irreversible pulpitis, pulp necrosis
or chronic pulp infection with/without haemorrhage,
suppuration or purulence, and with/without signs of pain,
sensitivity to percussion, swelling, appearance of fistula
and/or pathological mobility. The crowns of affected teeth
had to be in restorable conditions. Radiographic inclusive
criteria were: presence/absence of root resorptions (if
resorption existed, only those of exfoliation up to the
one third of root size were acceptable), and with/without
apical periodontal lesions. Non-restorable teeth, teeth with
clinical or radiographic signs of perforated root furcation,
presence of extensive external (more than one third of root
size) and/or internal root resorption, and/or presence of
apical radicular cysts were excluded from the study27,29.
Clinical procedure
After clinical examination and radiographic
evaluation and diagnosis, the LSTR method included
the following clinical protocol during the first visit.
If the therapeutic procedure was painful for the child
patient, local anaesthesia in the vestibular gingival area
of affected tooth root was administered (Orabloc®,
Pierrel S.P.A., Italy; with articaine hydrochloride 40mg/L
and 1:100,000 adrenaline 0.01mg/L). After removal
of carious dentine, followed with removal of infected
pulpal tissue from chamber and root canal entrances of
indicated affected primary molar, pulpotomy was finally
performed. The pulp chamber was then irrigated with
3% Na-hypochlorite and saline solution afterwards and
dried with cotton pellets. Then the triple antibiotic paste
was placed at the entrances of the root canals. The paste
had the following antibiotic composition: amoxicillin
(Amoksicilin HF® capsules a 500 mg; Hemofarm
AD, Vršac, Srbija), doxycycline (Doksiciklin HF®
capsules a 100 mg; Hemofarm AD, Vršac, Srbija) and
metronidazole (Metrozol® tablets a 500 mg; Bosnalijek,
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina). Antibiotic powders
from capsules and tablets were properly pulverized and
themselves could not always be the proper solutions, but
often could only open more problems for those children
with behaviour problems in dental office. These situations
were the most stressful paths which enormously in long
term could interfere with child oral and general health,
and with their quality of life as well1-6.
In endodontics of primary teeth, the treatment of
irreversibly changed dental pulp tissue with antibiotic
pastes has been present in the last more than 30 years.
Endodontic treatment of irreversibly changed pulp
of primary teeth, with the use of paste composed of a
combination of antibiotics, was first presented by Hoshino
and Sato et al. back in 1990 and 1992, respectively5,8-10.
Over time, therapeutic approaches have been changed
in terms of partial or complete removal of irreversibly
changed pulpal tissue, with the use of combinations of
different kinds of antibiotics, in order to improve the
prognosis of these procedures as much as possible11-15. The
therapeutic approach was described as lesion sterilization
and tissue repair (LSTR) method and was based on the
reparation of pulpal and/or periodontal tissue of primary
teeth under the action of the applied antibiotic combination.
Validation of the LSTR method on multi-rooted primary
teeth has shown very good prognostic results so far,
with the reduction and/or disappearance of previously
present clinical and radiographic symptoms, without any
interference with the eruption of permanent replacement
teeth. Also, considering the fact that the LSTR method
showed equally good results whether it was performed
within pulpotomy, high amputation or pulpectomy, it
greatly facilitated the treatment of affected primary teeth
with a poor prognosis. When used within pulpotomy form,
LSTR method also greatly facilitated and simplified the
process of endodontic treatment, made it faster and feasible
even for very young child patients, with reduced number
of visits. This have given the LSTR method a significant
advantage over conventional pulpectomy methods,
especially in child patients with a poor level of cooperation
in dental office. Thus, the LSTR approach is one of the
good endodontic therapeutic alternatives for affected
primary teeth with a poor prognosis, which could otherwise
be condemned to premature extraction16-27.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the medium-
term clinical success in everyday practice of the LSTR
method applied in affected primary teeth with irreversible
pulpal tissue infections by observation of reduction/
absence of their clinical symptoms.
Material and Methods
Ethical considerations
This longitudinal observational non-randomized
clinical study was approved by the Ethics Committee of
the Faculty of Dentistry with Clinics of the University
Balk J Dent Med, Vol 27, 2023 LSTR Method in Dental Pulp Therapy 17
analyses were performed with IBM SPSS statistical
software package v. 17. for Windows operative system.
Results
Study sample was consisted of 40 child patients aged
4 to 9 years (M=6.66 years, SD= ± 1.49 years), with 45
primary molars included in total (Table 1).
Table 1. Affected primary molars treated with LSTR method in
study sample
Primary Tooth n %
maxillar first right molar 5 11.1
maxillar second right molar 2 4.4
maxillar first left molar 5 11.1
maxillar second left molar 7 15.6
mandibular first left molar 3 6.7
mandibular second left molar 10 22.2
mandibular first right molar 4 8.9
mandibular first right molar 9 20.0
Total 45 100.0
stored in as described previously17. The powders were
mixed together in 1:1:1 ratio and prepared together with
glycerine vehicle in paste form immediately prior to
its use. The tooth is then temporarily closed with a Zinc
Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) cement filling for 10 days.
After 10 days, the ZOE temporary filling was
removed altogether with the contents of the antibiotic
paste from the chamber. The chamber was washed with
saline solution and dried with cotton pellets. ZOE cement
was then placed on the bottom of the chamber and the
entrances of the root canals, followed by placing of a
permanent filling.
Clinical follow-up
For each patient whose primary molar tooth was
endodontically treated with the LSTR method a clinical
evaluation of treated tooth was performed at intervals
of 1 and 12 months afterwards. During these visits, the
presence/absence of following clinical parameters was
monitored: pain, sensitivity to percussion, swelling,
appearance of fistula and/or pathological mobility.
Statistical analyses
Obtained results were analysed descriptively and
presented in absolute and relative values in tables. Data
Table 2. Presentation of recorded clinical symptoms in affected primary molars during applying of LSTR method
first visit second visit
presence absence total presence absence total
recorded symptoms n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
pain 23 (51.1) 22 (48.9) 45 (100) 3 (6.81) 41 (93.18) 44 (100)
percussion sensitivity 25 (55.6) 20 (44.4) 45 (100) 4 (9.09) 40 (90.90) 44 (100)
swelling 5 (11.1) 40 (88.9) 45 (100) 2 (4.54) 42 (95.45) 44 (100)
fistula 12 (26.7) 33 (73.3) 45 (100) 4 (9.09) 40 (90.90) 44 (100)
mobility 10 (22.2) 35 (77.8) 45 (100) 5 (11.36) 39 (88.63) 44 (100)
Table 3. Presentation of recorded clinical symptoms in affected primary molars during follow-up periods
after 1 month after 12 months
presence absence total presence absence total
recorded symptoms n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
pain 2 (6.1) 31 (93.9) 33 (100) 0 (0) 41 (100) 41 (100)
percussion sensitivity 1 (3.0) 32 (97.0) 33 (100) 2 (4.9) 39 (95.1) 41 (100)
swelling 0 (0) 33 (100) 33 (100) 0 (0) 41 (100) 41 (100)
fistula 1 (3.0) 32 (97.0) 33 (100) 0 (0) 41 (100) 41 (100)
mobility 0 (0) 33 (100) 33 (100) 4 (9.8) 37 (90.2) 41 (100)
Clinical symptoms recorded during clinical
examination of affected teeth while applying LSTR
method were presented in Table 2. It was obvious that the
symptoms related to affected sample teeth have already
been decreased almost immediately after initial action of
triple antibiotic paste. But, in the final second visit (after
10 days) of clinical procedure there were 39 patients and
44 teeth included, due to extraction of one tooth from
sample on child parent’s request.
After clinical follow-up recorded symptoms related
to affected sample teeth were presented in Table 3.
Further continuous decrease and disappearance
of previously recorded clinical symptoms were noted.
Twenty-eight patients (70% out of total sample) with 33
affected teeth treated initially with LSTR method were
present in the first follow-up period after 1 month. LSTR
method was considered as successful in 26 patients (92%)
and 29 teeth. One more child had symptoms of persistent
18 Amila Zukanović et al. Balk J Dent Med, Vol 27, 2023
root canals of primary molars during 12-months follow-up
period.
LSTR method was substantially based on the idea of
regenerative endodontics in permanent teeth, where, after
performed pulpectomy, temporarily applied antibiotic
paste root fillings intended to disinfect remained root canal
space and root dentin, and at the same time to re-initiate
the potential of surrounding soft and/or hard dental tissues
to regenerate. The idea of not removing infected pulpal
tissue from the root canals of affected tooth was only
present in primary teeth for a long time, but with various
kinds of therapeutic approaches applied. They all intended
to minimize or exclude further infectious pulpal tissue
potential to apical direction. Otherwise, these non-vital
pulpotomy procedures were judged to failure, and, with
endangering of local, oral and general health, could only
lead to premature extraction5-8, 39.
In paediatric dentistry there are several basic
indications for every kind of dental treatment related
to its invasiveness, and also to child general and mental
health regarding their capabilities for understanding and
cooperate during planned dental treatments. The more
invasive the treatment was, in combination with the
more invasive dental treatment could be, would result in
uncooperative dental behaviour. That is why everyday
paediatric dental practice needs those kind of therapeutic
solutions, even in situations that usually would have poor
prognosis, in order to preserve and improve poor oral
health. Otherwise, in everyday oral pathology in children
of preschool and young middle childhood age, where
indications for non instrumental endodontic non-vital
treatment in primary teeth were numerous, we usually
could have consequent disturbed orofacial development
and developed dental fear and anxiety in child patients
as long-term outcomes. These outcomes could have
great potential to be pretty reduced with LSTR method
applied1-5, 24, 27.
LSTR method basically used combination of
three antibiotics in order to cover and eliminate as
much bacterial strains and types that were present in
infected pulpal tissue. Some of these antibiotics, like
nitroimidazoles and macrolides classes, could have
various side-effects in their more usual non-dental use in
adults. Furthermore, there were also some doubts present
regarding their profound long-term disinfection and
sterilization potential, which could result in microbial
recolonization and therapeutic failures, and consequent
harm to oral and general health of child patients. But,
proper specific antibiotic usage in LSTR method within
determined indications could result in several evidence
based benefits only, which would eliminate these
opponent opinions for their dental use. Although LSTR
method was first introduced in Japan pretty long time
ago, and mostly applied sporadically afterwards, the
American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry have adopted
it recently and included in the guidelines of non vital pulp
pain and fistula related to affected sample tooth, which
had to be extracted upon parent’s request.
In the final follow-up after 12 months there were
38 patients (95%) present with 41 affected sample teeth.
Percussion sensitivity and mobility were only recorded
in affected sample teeth which were within the process
of exfoliation. Furthermore, primary teeth were regularly
exfoliated by their permanent successors in another 2
patients, with sound enamel and no clinical signs of any
kind regarding developmental disturbances on their
crowns.
Final outcome after 12-months follow-up period
was success of applied LSTR method in 38 patients and
43 (95.6%) affected sample teeth in a way that initial
clinical symptoms completely decreased and disappeared.
In 2 patients with 2 (4.4%) affected sample teeth applied
LSTR method was considered as unsuccessful and ended
up with extractions upon their parents’ requests.
Discussion
Application of LSTR method as non-
instrumentational form of endodontic treatment for non-
vital pulp in primary teeth has been shown as successful
technique in most of the reported related papers so far.
Indeed, the success rates in the last five years were high
but variable (mainly higher than 80%), as for the method
itself, and compared to the other performed pulpotomy
techniques23, 29-34. Furthermore, this method was even
more time consuming than some of other methods35.
Pretty high success rate in our study sample corresponded
to these results.
When compared to the pulpectomy, LSTR approach
as more convenient method was more successful in
affected teeth with root resorption in the first 12 months
after its application25,26. Our final clinical follow up
period was up until 12 months and without clinical
findings to compare these claims due to the fact that our
observational period was not longer than a year.
LSTR method itself has experienced many
modifications regarding the antibiotic compositions
and concentrations with intention to cover as much of
different kinds of microorganisms as possible within
infected pulp tissue and surrounding dentinal walls of
root canals. The idea was to disinfect those affected soft
and hard dental tissues in order to sterilize them from
microorganisms, and to consequently let the surrounding
tissues to regenerate36-38. The combination of antibiotics
in our study included specific members of penicillins,
macrolides and nitroimidazoles with their equal ratio,
and the final form of paste was prepared with glycerine
vehicle. It seemed that this antibiotic paste has enabled
profound penetration rate for disinfection and sterilization
of infected soft and hard dental tissues within affected
Balk J Dent Med, Vol 27, 2023 LSTR Method in Dental Pulp Therapy 19
References
1. Cameron AC, Widmer RP (eds.). Handbook of Pediatric
Dentistry. 4th Edition. Mosby; 2013.
2. Nowak AC, Christensen J, Mabry T, Townsed J, Wells M
(eds.) Pediatric Dentistry Infancy Through Adolescence. 6th
edition. Saunders; 2018.
3. Dean JA, Jones JE, Walker Vinson LA (eds.). McDonald
and Avery’s Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 10th
edition. Elsevier; 2016.
4. Welbury R, Duggal MS, Hosey MT (eds.). Paediatric
dentistry. 5th edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
5. Fuks AB, Benjamin P. Pediatric Endodontics-Current
Concepts in Pulp Therapy for Primary and Young
Permanent Teeth. Springer; 2016.
6. Ritwik P. A review of pulp therapy for primary and
immature permanent teeth. J Calif Dent Assoc,
2013;41:585-595.
7. Hamed MH, Gul M, Ghafoor R, Badar SB. Management
of immature necrotic permanent teeth with regenerative
endodontic procedures - a review of literature. J Pak Med
Assoc, 2019;69:1514-1520.
8. Nicoloso GF, Potter IG, de Oliveira Rocha R, Montagner
F, Casagrande L. A comparative evaluation of endodontic
treatments for immature necrotic permanent teeth based on
clinical and radiographic outcomes: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2017;27:217-227.
9. Sato T, Hoshino E, Uematsu H, Kota K, Iwaku M, Noda
T. Bactericidal Efficacy of a Mixture of Ciprofloxacin,
Metronidazole, Minocycline and Rifampicin against Bacteria
of Carious and Endodontic Lesions of Human Deciduous
Teeth In Vitro. Microb Ecol Health Dis, 1992;5:171-717.
10. Hoshino E. Sterilization of carious lesions by drugs. JJADS,
1990;9:32-37.
11. Sato T, Hoshino E, Uematsu H, Noda T. In vitro
antimicrobial susceptibility to combinations of drugs of
bacteria from carious and endodontic lesions of human
deciduous teeth. Oral Microbiol Immunol, 1993;8:172-176.
12. Hoshino E, Kurihara-Ando N, Sato I, Uematsu H, Sato M,
Kota K, et al. In-vitro antibacterial susceptibility of bacteria
taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin,
metronidazole and minocycline. Int Endod J, 1996;29:125-130.
13. Sato I, Kurihara-Ando N, Kota K, Iwaku M, Hoshino
E. Sterilization of infected root-canal dentine by topical
application of a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and
minocycline in situ. Int Endod J, 1996;29:118-124.
14. Takushige T, Cruz EV, Asgor Moral A, Hoshino E.
Endodontic treatment of primery teeth using a combination
of antibacterial drugs. Int Endod J, 2004;37:132-138.
15. Anila B, Murali H, Cheranjeevi J, Kapil RS. Lesion
Sterilization and Tissue Repair (LSTR): A Review. J Sci
Dent, 2014;4:49-55.
16. Prabhakar AR, Sridevi E, Raju OS, Satish V. Endodontic
treatment of primary teeth using combination of
antibacterial drugs: An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod
Prevent Dent, 2008;26:S5-10.
17. Nakornchai S, Banditsing P, Visetratana N. Clinical
evaluation of 3Mix and Vitapex as treatment options for
pulpally involved primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent,
2010;20:214-221.
non-instrumentation endodontic treatment for primary
teeth with poor prognosis24, 25, 27, 40, 41. The best indicator
whether this method is completely successful in primary
teeth was to show if its application could interfere normal
exfoliation process of their permanent successors in any
way. One longitudinal study has been conducted so far,
where all of 87 affected primary teeth completed their
exfoliation process with the mean function time of 680
days (range 68-2390 days), and replaced afterwards with
permanent successors without signs of developmental or
any other disturbances of any kind14. In our 12-months
follow-up period natural exfoliation process has ended up
successful with undisturbed permanent succession in two
cases.
There were several limitations of this study. First of
all, intention of this paper was to show cases with LSTR
method applied from our everyday practice, which have
resulted in observational non-randomized study, where
control and/or other comparative experimental groups
of patients were not established. Also, study protocol
followed our everyday clinical routine in the dental
office, where final restorations after second visit usually
were not stainless steel crowns (SSC), but rather mostly
glass-ionomer cement fillings. This fact could have more
potential to compromise the sealing after final restoration
than SSC. But, our follow-up results did not show
these potential filling microleakage problems. Various
methodology approaches of other compared authors
and papers were present during data comparing process
regarding clinical diagnoses of affected primary teeth,
combination and dosage of used antibiotics, follow-up
periods and outcomes. These facts should be considered in
the future studies, in order to avoid potential problems in
establishing the strictest evidence based clinical guidelines
for LSTR method in primary teeth for everyday practice.
Conclusions
LSTR method has been shown as successful
pulpotomy technique for non-instrumental endodontic
approach in non-vital pulp treatment of primary molar
teeth in a 12-months follow-up period. This method
proved as the most convenient and time consuming
technique for the affected primary molars with irreversible
pulp infections of poor prognosis, which enabled delay/
cancellation of their premature extractions, and decrease
of appearance of dental fear and anxiety and behaviour
problems in child patients in the dental office.
Acknowledgements. We would like to acknowledge
the great efforts of the stuff of the Clinic for Preventive
and Paediatric Dentistry of the Faculty of Dentistry with
Clinics of the University of Sarajevo, for this study to be
successfully accomplished.
20 Amila Zukanović et al. Balk J Dent Med, Vol 27, 2023
33. Garrocho-Rangel A, Jalomo-Ávila C, Rosales-Berber
MÁ, Pozos-Guillén A. Lesion Sterilization Tissue Repair
(LSTR) Approach Of Non-Vital Primary Molars With A
Chloramphenicol-Tetracycline-ZOE Antibiotic Paste: A
Scoping Review. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2021;45:369-375.
34. Agarwal SR, Bendgude VD, Kakodkar P. Evaluation of
Success Rate of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair
Compared to Vitapex in Pulpally Involved Primary Teeth: A
Systematic Review. J Conserv Dent, 2019;22:510-515.
35. Moura J, Lima M, Nogueira N, Castro M, Lima C, Moura
M, Moura L. LSTR Antibiotic Paste Versus Zinc Oxide and
Eugenol Pulpectomy for the Treatment of Primary Molars
with Pulp Necrosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatr
Dent, 2021;43:435-442.
36. Nalawade TM, Parikh D and Mallikarjuna RM. Lesion
Sterilization and Tissue Repair (LSTR) Technique and its
Clinical Application in Primary and Permanent Teeth: A
Review. Ann Essence Dent, 2019;11:1-6.
37. Satenahalli SB, Vardhana BS, Surana P, Gopal R, Ranjan
AP, et al. Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair (LSTR): A
Review. Eur J Mol Clin Med, 2020;7:7909-7914.
38. Shankar K, Ramkumar H, Dhakshinamoorthy S,
Paulindraraj S, Jayakaran TG, Bommareddy CS.
Comparison of Modified Triple Antibiotic Paste in Two
Concentrations for Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair
in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Interventional Randomized
Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2021;14:388-392.
39. Arslan H, Ahmed HMA, Şahin Y, Doğanay Yıldız E,
Gündoğdu EC, Güven Y, et al. Regenerative Endodontic
Procedures in Necrotic Mature Teeth with Periapical
Radiolucencies: A Preliminary Randomized Clinical Study.
J Endod, 2019;45:863-872.
40. Cross R, Ling C, Day NP, McGready R, Paris DH.
Revisiting doxycycline in pregnancy and early childhood-
-time to rebuild its reputation? Expert Opin Drug Saf,
2016;15:367-382.
41. Dilley M, Geng B. Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity
Reactions to Antibiotics: Aminoglycosides, Clindamycin,
Linezolid, and Metronidazole. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol.
2022 Jun;62(3):463-475.
Received on August 18, 2022.
Revised on September 2, 2022.
Accepted on September 20, 2022.
Conflict of Interests: Nothing to declare.
Financial Disclosure Statement: Nothing to declare.
Human Rights Statement: All the procedures on humans were
conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975,
as revised 2000. Consent was obtained from the patient/s and
approved for the current study by national ethical committee.
Animal Rights Statement: None required.
Correspondence
Amila Zukanović
Department for Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry
Faculty od Dentistry with Clinics
University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
e-mail: amila.zukanovic@hotmail.com
18. Agarwal M, Das UM, Vishwanath D. A Comparative
Evaluation of Noninstrumentation Endodontic Techniques
with Conventional ZOE Pulpectomy in Deciduous Molars:
An in vivo Study. World J Dent, 2011;2:187-192.
19. Pinky C, Shashibhushan KK, Subbareddy VV. Endodontic
treatment of necrosed primary teeth using two different
combinations of antibacterial drugs: An in vivo study. J
Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 2011;29:121-127.
20. Trairatvorakul C, Detsomboonrat P. Success rates of a
mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and minocycline
antibiotics used in the non-instrumentation endodontic
treatment of mandibular primary molars with carious pulpal
involvement. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2012;22:217-227.
21. Bansal R, Jain A. Overview on the Current Antibiotic
Containing Agents Used in Endodontics. N Am J Med Sci,
2014;6:351-358.
22. Doneria D, Thakur S, Singhal P, Chauhan D. Comparative
evaluation of clinical and radiological success of zinc
oxide-ozonated oil, modified 3mix-mp antibiotic paste, and
vitapex as treatment options in primary molars requiring
pulpectomy: An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev
Dent, 2017;35:346-352.
23. Lokade A, Thakur S, Singhal P, Chauhan D, Jayam C.
Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiographic success
of three different lesion sterilization and tissue repair
techniques as treatment options in primary molars requiring
pulpectomy: An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev
Dent, 2019;37:185-191.
24. Coll JA, Dhar V, Vargas K, Chen CY, Crystal YO,
AlShamali S, et al. Use of Non-Vital Pulp Therapies in
Primary Teeth. Pediatr Dent, 2020;42:337-349.
25. Coll JA, Vargas K, Marghalani AA, Chen CY, AlShamali
S, Dhar V, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
of Nonvital Pulp Therapy for Primary Teeth. Pediatr Dent,
2020;42:256-272.
26. Duarte ML, Pires PM, Masterson Ferreira DM, Vaz Braga
Pintor A, de Almeida Neves A, Cople Maia LC, et al. Is
there evidence for the use of lesion sterilization and tissue
repair therapy in the endodontic treatment of primary teeth?
A systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin Oral Invest,
2020;24:2959-2972.
27. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pulp therapy
for primary and immature permanent teeth. The Reference
Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American
Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, 2021:399-407.
28. World Medical Association. World Medical Association
Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research
involving human subjects. JAMA, 2013;310:2191-2194.
29. Sijini OT, Sabbagh HJ, Baghlaf KK, Bagher AM,
El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi NM, Bagher SM. Clinical
and radiographic evaluation of triple antibiotic paste pulp
therapy compared to Vitapex pulpectomy in non-vital
primary molars. Clin Exp Dent Res, 2021;7:819-828.
30. Zacharczuk GA, Toscano MA, López GE, Ortolani AM.
Evaluation of 3Mix-MP and pulpectomies in non-vital
primary molars. Acta Odontol Latinoam, 2019;32:22-28.
31. Raslan N, Mansour O, Assfoura L. Evaluation of antibiotic
mix in Non-instrumentation Endodontic Treatment of necrotic
primary molars. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 2017;18:285-290.
32. Chouchene F, Masmoudi F, Baaziz A, Maatouk F, Ghedira
H. Antibiotic Mixtures in Noninstrumental Endodontic
Treatment of Primary Teeth with Necrotic Pulps: A
Systematic Review. Int J Dent, 2021;2021:5518599.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) antibiotic paste comprised of chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and zinc oxide and eugenol (CTZ) versus zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) pulpectomy in the treatment of primary molars with pulp necrosis. Methods: A total of 70 three- to eight-year-old subjects with 88 primary mandibular molars with pulp necrosis were included. The teeth were randomized to the CTZ group or ZOE group. The time taken to perform both techniques was recorded. The parents of the children and the dentist who performed clinical evaluations were blind to the group assignment, although the radiographic evaluator could see the difference in treatments. Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed at three, six, nine, and 12 months. Results: At the 12-month evaluation, the clinical success was 86.4 percent for CTZ and 90.9 percent for ZOE (P=0.50), the radiographic success was 75.0 percent for CTZ and 72.7 percent for ZOE (P=0.81), and the overall success was 70.5 percent for CTZ and 72.7 percent for ZOE (P=0.81). The mean time taken to perform was 61.4 (±20.5 standard deviation) minutes for CTZ and 145.1 (±53.2) minutes for ZOE (P<0.001). Conclusions: At 12 months, both techniques presented no significant difference in success rates for nonvital pulp therapy in primary molars with necrosis. The lesion sterilization and tissue repair procedure time using chloramphenicol, tetracycline, zinc oxide, and eugenol was significantly shorter than for a zinc oxide eugenol pulpectomy.
Article
Full-text available
Hypersensitivity reactions including IgE-mediated and delayed cell-mediated reactions to aminoglycosides, clindamycin, linezolid, and metronidazole are rare. For aminoglycosides, allergic contact dermatitis is the most frequent reaction for which patch testing can be a useful step in evaluation. For clindamycin, delayed maculopapular exanthems are the most common reactions. There are case reports of clindamycin associated with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, and symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE). For linezolid, cases of hypersensitivity were exceedingly rare and included urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis, delayed rashes, and DRESS. For metronidazole, only rare cases were found across a broad spectrum of reactions including allergic contact dermatitis, fixed drug eruption, angioedema, anaphylaxis, serum sickness-like reaction, SJS/TEN, AGEP, SDRIFE, and a possible case of DRESS. IgE-mediated reactions and anaphylaxis to these types of antibiotics are uncommon, and reports of skin testing concentrations and desensitization protocols are largely limited to case reports and series. Non-irritating skin testing concentrations have been reported for gentamycin, tobramycin, and clindamycin. Published desensitization protocols for intravenous and inhaled tobramycin, oral clindamycin, intravenous linezolid, and oral and intravenous metronidazole have also been reported and are reviewed.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: "Lesion sterilization and tissue repair" (LSTR) is a non-instrumentation endodontic treatment modality that has recently gained popularity with promising results in several clinical trials. However, there is a dearth of evidence regarding the concentration of modified triple antibiotic paste (MTAP) to be used for the procedure. Aim and objective: To compare the clinical and radiographic efficacy of 1 mg/mL and 1 g/mL concentrations of MTAP (ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and clindamycin) used in LSTR of primary molars. Materials and methods: Sixty-four infected primary molars in children between 4 years and 10 years of age were randomly allocated to two groups. Lesion sterilization and tissue repair at 1 mg/mL concentration of MTAP (group I) and 1 g/mL concentration of MTAP (group II) was performed. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated using Coll and Sadrian's criteria at 10 days, 1 month, and 3 months and the results were tabulated. Statistical analysis: The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis with IBM. SPSS statistics software 23.0 Version. To test the significance in categorical data, a Chi-square test was used. The probability value of 0.05 was considered significant. Results: At the end of 3 months review, clinical success rates of group I and group II were 84.4 and 90.6%, respectively, and radiographic evaluation showed group I-78.1% and group II-90.6%. Conclusion: Both 1 mg/mL and 1 g/mL concentrations of MTAP used in LSTR of primary molars had similar success rates with no statistically significant difference. Clinical significance: Lesion sterilization and tissue repair when found to be equally effective in less concentration may aid in achieving adequate infection control with the least detrimental effect on the remaining vital pulp and periradicular structures. In addition, this circumvents the systemic administration of potent antibiotics thus combating antibiotic resistance. How to cite this article: Shankar K, Ramkumar H, Dhakshinamoorthy S, et al. Comparison of Modified Triple Antibiotic Paste in Two Concentrations for Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Interventional Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(3):388-392.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives This study compared and evaluated the clinical and radiographic efficacy of non-instrumentation triple antibiotic paste pulp therapy and Vitapex pulpectomy in non-vital primary molars. Material and Methods Healthy, 5–9 years old children with at least one non-vital primary molar were included in the study. Molars were divided into two groups based on the subject's cooperation level. In the first group, molars received triple antibiotic paste, and a second group received Vitapex pulpectomy followed by a stainless-steel crown. Triple antibiotic paste was freshly prepared and proportioned in equal parts by volume (metronidazole, minocycline, and ciprofloxacin = 1:1:1) before the scheduled treatment. A clinical and radiographic examination was performed by two trained and calibrated pediatric dentists at the pre-operative baseline and the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. Results A total of 28 molars received triple antibiotic paste pulp therapy and 20 received Vitapex pulpectomy. At the 6-month follow-up, the success rate among the molars in the triple antibiotic paste group was clinically (92.85%) and radiographically (85.71%) higher compared to the Vitapex group (91.67%, 62.50% respectively) with p = 0.89 and 0.55 respectively. At the 12-month follow-up, the molars in the triple antibiotic paste group showed lower clinical (95.45%) but higher radiographic success rate (72.73%) compared to the Vitapex group (100% and 62.50%) with (p = 0.85 and 0.47) respectively. None of the differences were statistically significant. Conclusions Both triple antibiotic paste and Vitapex can be clinically and radiographically effective in treating non-vital primary molars.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of topical antibiotic mixtures used in noninstrumental endodontic treatment (NIET) of primary teeth. Methods: Electronic databases including MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus database were searched. Randomized clinical trials evaluating the clinical and radiological outcomes of topical antibiotics used in NIET were selected. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the quality of the methodology of the included articles. Results: Five articles comparing the outcomes of four different drugs combination were included. Three studies conducted to evaluate the success rate of two combinations of antibacterial drugs consisting of ciprofloxacin-minocycline-metronidazole (3 Mix) in one group and ciprofloxacin-minocycline-ornidazole in the other group showed no statistically significant difference between both groups (P > 0.05). The ciprofloxacin-minocycline-ornidazole group showed better results compared with the 3 Mix group. One study conducted to compare the effectiveness of 3 Mix with ciprofloxacin-tinidazole-minocycline reported no significant difference between both groups, and one study that compared 3 Mix and ciprofloxacin-metronidazole-clindamycin mixture concluded that the overall success rates of both groups were 80.96% and 76.20%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Based on the overall success rates, the ciprofloxacin-minocycline-ornidazole mixture was considered more effective than the 3 Mix which was more effective than the ciprofloxacin-tinidazole-minocycline and the ciprofloxacin-metronidazole-clindamycin groups. Clinical Relevance. Different antibiotic combinations, showing good clinical and radiographic success in treating necrotic primary teeth, can be used effectively in NIET and this technique can be considered effective for teeth with advanced root resorption and when conventional endodontic treatment is contraindicated.
Article
This new edition of Paediatric Dentistry is a trustworthy guide to the essentials of paediatric dentistry for both students and practitioners alike. Written in a user-friendly style, this textbook contains over 18 fully up-to-date and comprehensive chapters. All content has been carefully structured to ensure the reader is provided with both key theoretical and practical information on paediatric dental care. Chapter content ranges from dental trauma and child safeguarding through to prevention and restorative treatments, in addition to further content on oral surgery and paediatric oral medicine. Each chapter is complemented by the use of key point boxes, full colour illustrations, and photographs to enhance the understanding clinical technique. With recommended further reading and extensive key references, this core text also encourages students to critically analyse and evaluate evidence. Edited by a team of experts in the field, this is an excellent introduction to the field of paediatric dentistry for both undergraduate and post-graduate students as well as a key source of reference for practising clinicians.
Article
The study aimed to perform a systematic scoping review with the need of exploring the actual clinical applications of the chloramphenicol-tetracycline-ZOE antibiotic paste (CTZ) as a lesion sterilization tissue repair (LSTR) therapy agent. Following a scoping framework suggested by Arksey and O’Malley, relevant articles (randomized controlled trials, literature reviews, observational studies, in vitro studies, and clinical case-series reports) published over the last 15 years (in English, Spanish, or Portuguese languages) were identified and retrieved from five internet databases: PubMed, Embase/Ovid, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and EBSCO. By title and abstract screening and after removing duplicates, 11 articles were finally included in the present scoping review: five randomized/non-randomized clinical trials, five in vitro studies, and one case-series report. According to the collected information, there were no differences between CTZ paste and conventional pulpectomy, antibiotic pastes, and intracanal filling materials, considering the clinical, radiographic, antimicrobial activity, and periapical tissue biocompatibility outcomes. CTZ has shown excellent rates of clinical success and good radiographic results, with adequate antimicrobial effects; however, its biocompatibility has been put into doubt. Contemporary pediatric dentists should carefully consider the CTZ paste as an alternative endodontic approach for pulpally involved primary molars, with the advantages of being simple and fast, and taking into account the limitations of instrumental pulpectomy such as the microbiological and morphological complexity of primary root canals.
Article
Purpose: To present an evidence-based guideline for non-vital pulp therapies due to deep caries or trauma in primary teeth. Methods: The authors, working with the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis for studies on non-vital primary teeth resulting from trauma or caries and used the GRADE approach to assess level of certainty of evidence for clinical recommendations. Results: GRADE was assessed from high to very low. Comparing teeth with/without root resorption, pulpectomy success was better (P<0.001) in those without preoperative root resorption. Zinc oxide plus iodoform plus calcium hydroxide ([ZO/iodoform/CH]; Endoflas TM ) and zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) pulpectomy success did not differ from iodoform (iodoform plus calcium hydroxide; VitapexTM, MetapexTM) (P=0.55) after 18-months; however, ZO/iodoform/CH and ZOE success rates remained near 90 percent while iodoform was 71 percent or less. Network analysis ratings showed ZO/iodoform/CH and ZOE better than iodoform. Lesion sterilization tissue repair (LSTR) was better (P<0.001) than pulpectomy in teeth with preoperative root resorption, but pulpectomy results were better (P=0.09) if roots were intact. Rotary instrumentation of root canals was significantly faster (P<0.001) than manual, but the quality of fill did not differ (P=0.09) and both had comparable success. Network analysis ranked ZO/iodoform/CH the best, ZOE second, and iodoform lowest at 18 months. Success rates were not impacted by method of obturation or root length determination, type of tooth, number of visits, irrigants, smear layer removal, or timing/type of final restoration. Conclusions: Pulpectomy 18-month success rates supported ZO/iodoform/CH and ZOE pulpectomy over iodoform. LSTR had limited indication for teeth with resorbed roots and requires close monitoring.
Article
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess success rates for nonvital treatment in primary teeth for caries/trauma. Methods: Databases were searched between 1960 and 2020 for randomized controlled trials, cohorts, case series, and in vitro studies. The primary outcome was overall success (clinical and radiographic) for pulpectomy and lesion sterilization tissue repair (LSTR). Included articles were independently determined, agreed upon, data extraction assessed, risk of bias, meta-analyses, and assignment of quality of evidence (GRADE). Results: Comparing teeth with and without root resorption, pulpectomy success was better (P<0.001) in teeth without preoperative root resorption. Success with pulpectomies performed with zinc oxide eugenol [ZOE] and with Endoflas (ZOE plus iodoform plus calcium hydroxide) did not differ from that observed using Vitapex or Metapex (iodoform plus calcium hydroxide; P≥0.50) after 18 months; however, Endoflas and ZOE success rates remained near 90 percent versus 71 percent or less for iodoform. Network analysis ratings showed Endoflas and ZOE performed better than iodoform alone. Also, LSTR performed better (P<0.001) than pulpectomies in teeth with preoperative root resorption, but pulpectomy results were superior (P=0.09) if roots were intact. Rotary instrumentation of root canals was significantly faster (P<0.001) than manual instrumentation. Success rates were not impacted by method of obturation or root length determination, type of tooth, number of visits, irrigants, smear layer removal, or timing/type of final restoration. Conclusions: Eighteen-month success rates support Endloflas and zinc oxide eugenol pulpectomies over iodoform pulpectomies. Lesion sterilization tissue repair had limited indication for teeth with resorbed roots.
Article
Background: Vitapex has been a popular obturating material for several decades. In recent times, lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) has shown promising results. This technique uses a mixture of 3 antibiotics for sterilization of the root canals and healing of periradicular tissues. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to compile all the literature comparing Vitapex and LSTR for pulpally involved primary teeth and evaluate the success rate in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Materials and methods: This review is based on PRISMA guidelines. The electronic search on MEDLINE via PubMed database and Google scholar, cross-referencing and hand search of journals was carried out for articles from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2019. Articles only in the English language were selected. Out of the 17 articles, 3 unique articles were identified for the review, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials and 1 was a retrospective study. Results: All the three articles were assessed for their quality and all had a low risk of bias. It was found that LSTR and Vitapex had a high clinical success after 12 months. The radiographic success after 6 months was high but decreased after 12 months in both the groups. Conclusion: There is no difference in the success rate of LSTR as compared to Vitapex for the treatment of pulpally involved primary teeth.