ChapterPDF Available

Xochimilco Lake, Mexico. The importance of its preservation: challenges and opportunities

Authors:

Abstract

At present-day Xochimilco Lake is the habitat of multiple species, a source of oxygen and natural resources for Mexico City, and an important tourism and cultural center. This work presents a review of the historical, socioeconomic , environmental, and ecological aspects concerning Xochimilco Lake with the purpose of knowing the problematic surrounding the gradual loss of this space and identifying the challenges and opportunities for its rescue and preservation. It was found that the lacustrine area has become a eutro-phic wetland, due to diverse land-use practices, urbanization, and the quality of the treated water supplied to the system. It is estimated that 55% of the endemic species are found established in some state of conservation. Among the main challenges and opportunities for political, social, and scientific actors, we find the following: improving the quality of the water through particular strategies, such as the bioremediation of the lacustrine system, continuing with the protection of endemic species, preserving the chinampera culture, and incentivizing sustainability in tourism and the use of the resources, with the aid of the circular economy.
559
Xochimilco Lake, Mexico. The importance of its
preservation: challenges and opportunities
n. n. doMínguez AlFAro1, d. guerrA rAMírez2,
M. c. rodríguez pAlAcio3, p. cAStillA hernÁndez4
Abstract
At present-day Xochimilco Lake is the habitat of multiple species, a source
of oxygen and natural resources for Mexico City, and an important tourism
and cultural center. is work presents a review of the historical, socioeco-
nomic, environmental, and ecological aspects concerning Xochimilco Lake
with the purpose of knowing the problematic surrounding the gradual loss
of this space and identifying the challenges and opportunities for its rescue
and preservation. It was found that the lacustrine area has become a eutro-
phic wetland, due to diverse land-use practices, urbanization, and the qual-
ity of the treated water supplied to the system. It is estimated that 55% of
the endemic species are found established in some state of conservation.
Among the main challenges and opportunities for political, social, and sci-
entic actors, we nd the following: improving the quality of the water
through particular strategies, such as the bioremediation of the lacustrine
1 Programa de Posgrado Doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud, División de Ciencias
Biológicas y de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, CMexico City, Mexico.
2 Laboratorio de Productos Naturales, Departamento de Preparatoria Agrícola, Universidad
Autónoma de Chapingo, Chapingo, Estado de México, Mexico.
3 Departamento de Hidrobiología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico
City, Mexico.
4 Departamento El Hombre y su Ambiente, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana–Xochimil-
co, Mexico City, Mexico.
THE PRACTICE OF MANAGING WATER RESOURCES
560
system, continuing with the protection of endemic species, preserving the
chinampera culture, and incentivizing sustainability in tourism and the use
of the resources, with the aid of the circular economy.
Keywords: Xochimilco Lake, wetland, chinampas, state or status of conserva-
tion, circular economy
1. Introduction
Xochimilco, located in Mexico City, dubbed as the Venice of Mexico, com-
prises a network of canals, chinampas (oating island gardens), and small
lakes, of approximately 203 km [1, 2, 3]. e canals and lagoons, variable in
depth, are fed by the treated water of the “Cerro de la Estrella” “San Luis
Tlaxialtemalco” water-treatment plants, which supply 1 m³/s and 0.225 m³/s,
respectively [1, 4]. e lacustrine plane presents altitudes of less than 2,240
meters above sea level (masl) [5]. e climate is temperate–sub-humid, with
rainfall during the summer [6]. Annual precipitation ranges between 200
and 900 mm of water, and the mean annual temperature is 15.9 °C [2].
In the region of Lake Xochimilco, interest in conserving the ecosystem
and the cultural richness has led to the participation of native peoples, civic
organizations, academic institutions, and independent citizens, in carrying
out works in diverse aspects such as socioecological studies, the analysis of
environmental contamination, the preservation of diverse native endemic
and migratory species, conservation of the chinampas, restoration practic-
es, the adaptation of environmental remediation technologies, the uses and
applications of the environmental services of the zone, etcetera [1, 4, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11].
In this review, information is gathered on the environmental, cultural,
touristic, and socioeconomic importance of Lake Xochimilco. Likewise, one
becomes aware of its deterioration and the eorts channeled to conserve it,
with the purpose of identifying the current challenges and opportunities in
order to contribute to its preservation, because the Lake is of great cultural,
environmental, and touristic value in Mexico City.
XOCHIMILCO LAKE, MEXICO. THE IMPORTANCE OF ITS PRESERVATION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 561
2. Macrobiodiversity
2.1 Vegetation
Among the plant species found in Xochimilco, 220 are terrestrial and 34 are
aquatic; among these, 18 are endemic (see Table 1). e vegetation is main-
ly composed of native as Salix bonplandiana [6], and some bryophytes have
been observed, including the following: Bryum argenteum; Fabronia ciliar-
is; Syntrichia pagorum, and Tortula pagorum, which together with the veg-
etation, co-exist with the following species of fungi: Xeromphalina sp.; As-
cobolus michaudii; Saccobolus depauperatus; Saccobolus truncatus, and
Ductifera pululahuana [11, 13]. In the chinampas horticultural crops are
produced [10] and, in hot houses, ornamental plants [16]. It is noteworthy
that among the reported species, there are 77 terrestrial and 20 aquatic that
are considered invasive and that could displace the native species and be, in
part, the causes of the extinction of the endemic species; thus, their popu-
lation should be controlled.
THE PRACTICE OF MANAGING WATER RESOURCES
562
2.2 Fauna
ere have been reported 47 endemic species in Xochimilco area (see Table
2). Xochimilco Lake, in addition to constituting an important sanctuary for
local species, also receives 140 species of migratory birds, which arrive at
the park during the winter [16]. is lacustrine system has encountered
problems as the invasion of exotic species, for example, carp (Cyprinus
carpio) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), which compete with the native
species for food [9, 20]. However, these are only two of the 23 invasive fau-
nistic species that should be monitored in order to maintain the ecological
equilibrium of the zone.
3. Microbiodiversity
3.1 Phytoplankton
With the aim of knowing the trophic status of the lacustrine system, diverse
studies have been conducted on the ourishing of alga [8, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25].
e diversity of microalgae and cyanobacteria is extensive (see Table 3): at
least 53 species are employed for valuable applications. In this eld there is
the opportunity to study those with potential for the production of metab-
olites-of-interest in the areas of foods, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, biore-
mediation, and bioenergetics, to mention only a few.
3.2 Zooplankton
Among the scarce studies on zooplankton, a wide diversity has been found
in Lake Xochimilco (Table 4). Some species, such as Brachionus angularis,
are of importance for the aquiculture of sh, crustaceans, and amphibians
[1]. e majority of these have been employed as indicators of contamina-
tion. e presence of Brachionus plicatilis, Brachionus leydigi, Brachionus
quadridentatus, and Alona sp. (copepod) in the Santa Cruz canal and in
Lake Xaltocan is associated with spilled treated water [45, 46].
XOCHIMILCO LAKE, MEXICO. THE IMPORTANCE OF ITS PRESERVATION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 563
4. The importance of the lacustrine zone
4.1 Environmental
Among the main ecosystemic services that supply Xochimilco Lake [47],
including the recharging of subterranean aquifers, regulation of the local
and regional water ow, and the maintenance of biodiversity [16], likewise,
the chinampas, which are small islands that are built with lake-bottom sed-
iments, branches, and decomposing vegetation, bordered by willow trees
(S. bonplandiana) [7, 16], result in a system for watering and in ecient
agricultural production [4, 7, 16, 46]. anks to the physical and biological
processes of Xochimilco Lake, there is ood control, a supply of oxygen,
and the regulation of the local climate [48]; thus, the lacustrine zone func-
tions ecologically as a spacious wetland, in the middle of an urban zone,
which should be preserved due to its great benets.
4.2 Cultural
Mexico City was founded on a system comprising ve lakes. In the southern
zone, today’s Xochimilco, the “Mexicas” indigenous peoples devoted them-
selves to pre-hispanic agriculture; this is how the chinampas were created;
those who cultivated these were known as chinamperos, xochimilcas, or
chinampatecas [7]. In the Nahuatl language, Xochimilco signies “in the
ower seedbed”, and the term chinampas, or chinamitl in Nahuatl, means
“hedge close to the reed” [1, 12]. In order to include the chinampera culture
on the World Heritage Site List, its originality and its productive system
being still robust was of utmost importance [47, 49].
e chinampas serve as a refuge for the axolotl, an emblematic species
of the culture of Xochimilco. From the Nahuatl axolotl (atl, water, and xolotl,
monster), the “aquatic monster” was considered by the “Mexicas” as one of
the most important of the Aztec gods (“Xolotl”). It was also considered to be
an exquisite delicacy and as a basic ingredient of a medicinal tonic [7, 50].
e scientic name for the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) was assigned
XOCHIMILCO LAKE, MEXICO. THE IMPORTANCE OF ITS PRESERVATION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 565
in 1798, by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. On
the other hand, since 1994, the A. mexicanum received Special Protection
status through the Xochimilco Ecological Rescue Plan [51]. e chinampas
and the axolotl are identity referents and geosymbols of Xochimilco.
4.3 Touristic
e environmental and cultural riches of Xochimilco are important tourist
attractions; visitors are interested in the history and wildlife of the zone [52]
and participate in a tour in water-transport vehicles (“trajineras”) rowed
through the canals, this ride one of the main tourist activities. e tourist
activities persist despite the diverse obstacles, such as irregular settlements,
the decient quality of the water, and the land subsidence, the result of the
extraction of subterranean water [49, 53]. In addition to controlling the
irregular settlements and improving the quality of the treated water, it would
be convenient to supply the water of the aquifer at the same rhythm that it
is extracted.
4.4 Socioeconomic
In Xochimilco the principal economic activities are agriculture and tourism
[12, 16, 53]. Another potential economic option includes the hobby of bird
watching; according to ornithological studies, Xochimilco possesses a wealth
of birds that reaches 249 species [11, 18]. It is estimated that bird watching
generated $329 million USD in Mexico, deriving from 1,183,095 bird watch-
ers, foreigners in the majority [54]. It has been reported that this activity
could activate the economy, as long as the quality of water improves [55];
therefore, the condition of this resource is vital for increasing the economic
value of Lake Xochimilco.
THE PRACTICE OF MANAGING WATER RESOURCES
566
5. Deterioration
e rhythm of environmental damage in Xochimilco was gradual and sub-
tle until the middle of the XX century. e rate of deterioration increased
as the Mexico-City population tripled in size [56]; thus, the greatest aec-
tation to the zone could be caused by urbanization [49, 57]. Despite the
prohibitions of land use vs. residential use in protected areas, it is estimated
that 25% of the protected wetlands is urbanized, and solely 17% of the
chinampas are considered active [56, 57]. e lacustrine deterioration in-
dicators include contamination of the water, water hyacinth plague, and
unkempt chinampas [1]. Part of the solution lies in the following aspects:
controlling urban sprawl; making the population aware of the care and man-
agement of water; providing information to the community on the invasive
or exotic species, and promoting the importance of preservation of native
and endemic species.
5.1 Loss of species
According to reports, around 55% of the endemic species of Xochimilco
are found established under some state of conservation [11, 15, 18] (see
Figure 1).
XOCHIMILCO LAKE, MEXICO. THE IMPORTANCE OF ITS PRESERVATION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 567
e disappearance of native fauna appears to be a direct consequence
of environmental degradation, mainly aecting the species of amphibians,
sh, and mollusks destined for human consumption [58]. e most report-
ed case is that of the axolotl (A. mexicanum), which is at present in danger
of extinction [7, 59]. Other species with less information with respect to
their extinction include the Tlaloc frog (Lithobates tlaloci), the Chapultepec
splitn sh (mexclapique) of the Basin of Mexico (Girardinichthys viviparus),
and the Xochimilca carp (Evarra bustamantei), currently extinct. e bird
known as the Aztec rail (Rallus tenuirostris) [2, 13], and one mammal, vol-
cano rabbit, also known as teporingo (Romerolagus diazi) [2, 60] are en-
demic species that are in danger of extinction. e majority of the species
are found limited in terms of the habitat that sustains them. us, the pres-
ervation of Lake Xochimilco and its well-being is crucial in order to oer
these species the hope of survival.
5.2 Contamination
Xochimilco has become a eutrophic wetland, and the current characteristics
of the canals and lagoons are due to the seasonal climatic conditions, the
diverse land-use management practices (agroecological, touristic, and ur-
ban), and the quality of the treated water [17, 23, 61]. It is important to take
measures to diminish the contaminants supplied to the aquifer and to invest
in removal treatments of these contaminants as well as of pathogens, but
always from an environmentally sustainable perspective.
6. Rescue programs
Since 1936, at the national and international level, diverse measures have
been implemented with the purpose of halting the deterioration of Xochi-
milco Lake (Figure 2) [62, 63, 64, 65, 66]. However, despite the eorts of
local, federal, and international authorities [67, 68], the lake and its resourc-
es appear to continue to be aected by the population growth [55].
THE PRACTICE OF MANAGING WATER RESOURCES
568
It would be convenient to involve the population to a greater degree, not
only with decision-making, but also in the application of the solutions and
initiatives.
7. Discussion
e challenges and tasks are many that should be carried out in the process
of preserving Xochimilco Lake; in order to achieve this, the implementa-
tion of diverse actions has been proposed [1], and just to mention a few as
follows: the construction of dwellings and of sustainable tourist services,
which include the design and production of ecological and biodegradable
goods, such as the use of Eco-friendly techniques: biodigesters; rainwater
collection; solar panels, dry bathrooms, etc. In addition, it is necessary to
promote environmental education, for example, workshops could be im-
plemented for composting household organic residues, thus obtaining bio-
fertilizers, promoting the water-care culture, and avoiding the land use and
environmental contaminants. Finally, it is necessary to manage external
nancial support with the aim of executing sustainable regional projects.
e adoption of sustainable practices should include the residents of the
zone, of the governmental sector, businesses, and/or acts of restoration that
facilitate it [69]. e circular economy would reduce the damaging eects
of the linear patterns of production, reducing the harmful eects of linear
patterns of production; that is, any primary product should be taken advan-
tage of in such a way that each piece of “waste” would become an asset and
XOCHIMILCO LAKE, MEXICO. THE IMPORTANCE OF ITS PRESERVATION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 569
no value would be unrecovered [70]. In this manner, sustainability would
be achieved in gradual fashion without neglecting the socioeconomic, cul-
tural, and touristic needs.
Xochimilco Lake possesses sucient resources with which a sustainable
circular economy could be implemented. For example, with the end of phy-
toremediation of the Cuemanco Canal, autochthonous aquatic plants have
been employed from the chinampera zone: rooted (Scirpus americanus) and
oating (Lemna gibba) macrophtyes [71]. e water hyacinth (Eichhornia
crassipes), despite its being a plague, is also used for this purpose. e water
resulting from the process of bioremediation could be utilized for watering
the chinampas, and the biomass of E. crassipes and L. gibba, as a bioenergy
generator. Similarly, the potential has been evaluated of two species of mi-
croalgae, that is, Chlorella vulgaris and Tetradesmus obliquus (isolated from
Lake Xochimilco) and from a cyanobacterium, Arthrospira maxima, for
removing nutrients from raw residual water and accumulating lipids for the
production of biodiesel [72]. Microalgae oer properties that allow them to
serve as the raw material for dierent applications.
8. Conclusion
To preserve the Xochimilco lacustrine area, it is necessary to activate the
circular economy in order to drive sustainability in tourism, improve the
quality of water and soil, foster the chinampera culture, and implement new
programs of the protection and conservation of native and endemic species.
Acknowledgements
e rst author thanks the support of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y
Tecnología (CONACyT) for studying the Doctorate degree in Ciencias Bi-
ológicas y de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
THE PRACTICE OF MANAGING WATER RESOURCES
570
References
[1] Figueroa-Torres, M. G., et al. (2014). Revista Digital E-BIOS Número Especial, 1-124.
[2] Alcaldía Xochimilco. (2021).
[3] Pérez-Belmont, P., et al. (2019). Freshwater Science 38(2), 342-351.
[4] Guevara, B. K., et al. (2015). Terra Latinoamericana 33, 263-273.
[5] Cram, S., et al. (2008). Boletín del Instituto de Geografía 66, 91-104.
[6] González-Morán, T. (1999). Journal of South American Earth Sciences 12(6), 607-613.
[7] Zambrano, L., et al. (2020). Ecological Restoration 38(2), 114-123.
[8] Tavera, R., et al. (2018). Cymbella 4(1), 3-46.
[9] Zambrano, L., et al. (2010). Biological Invasions 12(9), 3061-3069.
[10] Quiroz-Flores, A., et al. (2008). Polibotánica 25, 127-133.
[11] CONABIO. (2021).
[12] Ebel, R. (2020). HortTechology 30(1), 13-19.
[13] IBDATA. (2021).
[14] Alvarado, D., Saavedra, L. (2005). Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del
Am biente 11(1), 5-9.
[15] NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, (2021). 130 p.
[16] Merlín-Uribe, Y., et al. (2012). International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
9(31), 37-41.
[17] Zambrano, L., et al. (2009). Environmental Management 43, 149-263.
[18] NATURALISTA, (2021).
[19] Mahan, K. M., et al. (2021). Microbiol Resour Announc 10(24), 1-4.
[20] Mendoza, R. E., Koleff, P. (2014). Agua.org, 560 p.
[21] Bojórquez, L. (2017). Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco,
341 pp.
[22] Sosa-Hernández, J. E. et al. (2019). Marine Drugs 17(3), 174.
[23] Buendía-Flores, M., et al. (2015). Botanical Sciences 93(3), 531-558.
[24] Figueroa-Torres, M. G., et al. (2015). Ciencia Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
9(2), 15-29.
[25] López-Mendoza, Z., et al. (2015). Revista Especializada en Ciencias Químico-Biológi-
cas 18(1), 13-28.
[26] Robles, B., et al. (2018). Irrigation and Drainage 68(3), 1-8.
[27] Noviendri, D., et al. (2021). E3S Web of Conferences 232, 1-12.
[28] Imran, K. M., et al. (2021). Energies 14(8), 2260.
[29] Govindan, N., et al. (2021). Fermentation 7(1), 1-21.
[30] Aslam, A., et al. (2021). Sustainability 13(9), 5035.
[31] Salbitani, G., Carfagna, S. (2021). Sustainability 13(2), 956.
[32] Bahadar, A., Bilal Khan, M. (2013). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27,
128-148.
[33] Cobos, M., et al. (2016). Acta Biológica Colombiana 21(1), 17-26.
[34] Plöhn, M., et al. (2021). Physiologia Plantarum 173(2), 1-11.
XOCHIMILCO LAKE, MEXICO. THE IMPORTANCE OF ITS PRESERVATION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 571
[35] Yangilar, F., Yildiz, P. O. (2016). Journal of Science and Technology 9(1), 118-142.
[36] Choudhary, M., Bhattacharyya, K. G. (2020). SN Applied Sciences 2(10):1653.
[37] Schätzle, H., et al. (2021). Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 31(5), 645-658.
[38] Carralero, I., et al. (2021). Water 13(4), 542.
[39] Marrez, D. A., et al. (2022). Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry 12(1), 961-977.
[40] Zahedi, S., et al. (2020). Journal of Applied Phycology 33(2), 807-817.
[41] Han, J., et al. (2021). Marine Pollution Bulletin 163, 1-7.
[42] Liu, X., et al. (2021). Water 13(132), 1-11.
[43] Kottuparambil, S. (2020). Journal of Algal Biomass Utilization 11(1), 23-26.
[44] Zhu, J., Wakisaka, M. (2021). Fuel 283, 118920.
[45] Nandini, S., et al. (2016). Journal of Limnology 75(1), 91-100.
[46] Juárez-Figueroa, L. A., et al. (2003). Salud Pública de México 45(5), 389-395.
[47] Azamar, A., et al. (2019). Expresión Económica 43, 25-42.
[48] Martínez-Arroyo, A., Jáuregui, E. (2000). Urban Ecosystems 4, 145-166.
[49] Rivera, R. (2016). Diseño y Sociedad 40, 4-11.
[50] Ortega, A. J. (2000). Elementos 6(6), 55-57.
[51] Castellanos, G., et al. (2010). Centro de Estudios de Género, Mujer y Sociedad, 324 pp.
[52] Bride, I. G., et al. (2008). International Zoo Yearbook 42, 116-124.
[53] Pérez, A., et al. (2019). Revista Investigaciones Turísticas 17, 126-148.
[54] Cantú, J. C., et al. (2020). Defenders of Wildlife, 40 pp.
[55] Higuera, G. L. (2018). Universciencia 16(47), 1-10.
[56] Voss, S. R., et al. (2015). BioScience 65(12), 1134-1140.
[57] Eakin, H., et al. (2019). Ecology and Society 24(3), 15.
[58] Narchi, N. E. (2013). Veredas 27, 177-197.
[59] Lemos-Espinal, J. A., Smith, G. R. (2020). ZooKeys 951, 109-131.
[60] Espinosa-García, F. J., Villasenor, J. L. (2017). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 88,
76-96.
[61] Almanza-Encarnación, S., et al. (2012). Revista Digital E.BIOS 1(1), 32-40.
[62] FAO. (2017). Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricul-
tura.
[63] GODF. (2006). Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal, 164 p.
[64] GODF. (2005). Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal, 154 p.
[65] RAMSAR. (2004). The Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
[66] DOF. (1986). Diario Oficial de la Federación, 7 p.
[67] DI. (2021). Darwin Initiative.
[68] Griffiths, R. A., et al. (2003). Axolotl News 30, 12-18.
[69] Rehman, S.A., et al. (2021). Business Strategy and the Enviroment, 14 pp.
[70] Jawahir, I. S., Bradley, R. (2016). Procedia CIRP 40, 103-108.
[71] Martínez-Cruz, P., et al. (2006). Hidrobiológica 16(3), 211-219.
[72] Sacristán-De Alva, M., et al. (2014). Agrociencia 48, 271-284.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
In plant cells, ammonium is considered the most convenient nitrogen source for cell metabolism. However, despite ammonium being the preferred N form for microalgae, at higher concentrations, it can be toxic, and can cause growth inhibition. Microalgae’s tolerance to ammonium depends on the species, with various taxa showing different thresholds of tolerability and symptoms of toxicity. In the environment, ammonium at high concentrations represents a dangerous pollutant. It can affect water quality, causing numerous environmental problems, including eutrophication of downstream waters. For this reason, it is important to treat wastewater and remove nutrients before discharging it into rivers, lakes, or seas. A valid and sustainable alternative to conventional treatments could be provided by microalgae, coupling the nutrient removal from wastewater with the production of valuable biomass. This review is focused on ammonium and its importance in algal nutrition, but also on its problematic presence in aquatic systems such as wastewaters. The aim of this work is to provide recent information on the exploitation of microalgae in ammonium removal and the role of ammonium in microalgae metabolism.
Article
Full-text available
At the current alarming growth rate of the world's consumption, the linear economy model of creating products, using these products, and then disposing of them, with no consideration of the environmental, societal and economic impacts and consequences, is a flawed manufacturing approach that is unsustainable. Therefore, envisioning a future where nothing is wasted; a future where every “waste” becomes an asset, and no value goes unrecovered; a future where all products at the end of their primary use are recovered and either reused, remanufactured, or recycled for multiple generations, has become more than a reality, but a necessity. This emerging concept of circular economy, although gaining attention, lacks a technological perspective for effective implementation. This paper presents the principles of sustainable manufacturing to serve as the basis, and to provide the technological elements to ensure the creation of a circular economy. 6R-based technological elements are identified and shown as essential ingredients for achieving economic growth, environmental protection and societal benefits. Also presented is a case study with application that shows the life cycle cost benefits. An outlook for future research is then presented.
Article
The microalgae Oscillatoria sp. are promising sources of bioactive metabolites used in both pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications. The main objective of present study is to determine the antimicrobial activity, cytotoxicity, and chemical profile of Oscillatoria princeps r extracts and its fractions. O. princeps extracts were prepared by successive extraction method, and chemical constituents were identified using GC-MS. Diethyl ether extract (DEE) had antimicrobial activity against all tested microorganisms and the highest inhibition zones 20.7 and 20.2 mm was observed against P. aeruginosa and A. flavus, respectively. Also, DEE showed an anticancer activity with IC50 values of 35.18, 46.6, and 79.18 µg ml⁻¹ against breast cancer (MCF7), colon cancer (HCT116), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HePG2) cell lines, respectively. By DEE fractionation, fraction F7 showed the highest antimicrobial activity followed by fraction F4 with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ranged between 0.5 and 1.9 mg ml⁻¹. Fraction F4 recorded anticancer activity against HCT116, MCF7, and HePG2 with IC50 of 22.62, 24.43, and 102.52 µg ml⁻¹, respectively. While fraction F7 had anticancer activity against HCT116 and MCF7 without any effect on the HePG2 cell line. GC-MS analysis of fractions F4 and F7 represented that the main compounds responsible for the bioactivity were Pentadeconic acid,4-hexadecyl ester, and 9-Octadecenoic acid in F4, while the main compounds in F7 were Quercetin 7,3',4'-trimethoxy and Methyl tetradecanoate. The study concluded that O. princeps DEE extract and fractions had a sufficient amount of bioactive compounds that possess antimicrobial and anticancer activity, which could be a promising source for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical ingredients.
Article
The Basin of Mexico is a closed basin of lacustrine character, with an average elevation of 2200 m above sea level. The watershed covers a vast extension in five states. Mexico City and its metropolitan area are located within this basin. The aquifer system is the main source of water supply for more than 20 million people. Water consumption is about 60 m3/s. The aquifer supplies about 43 m3/s from around 1000 wells at 70–200 m depth. Pumping policies have generated subsidence and degradation of the ground water quality in the Basin of Mexico The lacustrian clay layers play an important role in the local hydrogeology, protecting the aquifer from pollution, but the transition and piedmont areas are highly vulnerable to surface pollutants.
  • M G Figueroa-Torres
Figueroa-Torres, M. G., et al. (2014). Revista Digital E-BIOS Número Especial, 1-124.
  • P Pérez-Belmont
Pérez-Belmont, P., et al. (2019). Freshwater Science 38(2), 342-351.
  • B K Guevara
Guevara, B. K., et al. (2015). Terra Latinoamericana 33, 263-273.
Boletín del Instituto de Geografía
  • S Cram
Cram, S., et al. (2008). Boletín del Instituto de Geografía 66, 91-104.
  • L Zambrano
Zambrano, L., et al. (2020). Ecological Restoration 38(2), 114-123.
  • R Tavera
Tavera, R., et al. (2018). Cymbella 4(1), 3-46.