A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL PAPER
Influence of source uncertainty on stochastic ground motion
simulation: a case study of the 2022 Mw 6.6 Luding, China, earthquake
Pengfei Dang
1,2,3
•Jie Cui
1,2
•Qifang Liu
4
•Yadong Li
1,2
Accepted: 16 March 2023 / Published online: 30 March 2023
ÓThe Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023
Abstract
On September 5, 2022 (local time), a magnitude 6.6 earthquake was reported to have occurred in Luding County, Sichuan
Province, Southwest China. In this simulation, a widely used stochastic finite-fault model was used to analyze how the
source models affect the near-fault earthquake ground motion simulations of the 2022 Mw 6.6 Luding earthquake in China.
Seven different slip models, one of them obtained from common fault parameters and random distributed slip amount, were
used to yield the best match with the recordings. The simulated earthquake ground motions calculated in the frequency
band of 0.05–20 Hz were compared with the observed values in both the time and frequency domains. Twelve acceleration
observation stations located near the fault plane were selected in our simulation for comparison. The average H/V curves
were estimated using the available acceleration records to consider the local site effect at each selected station. The
research results indicate that none of the source models adopted in this study fully estimate the observed values at all the
selected ground-motion stations. The simulated values of some slip models underestimate the level of the Fourier
amplitude spectrum at frequencies above 6 Hz. The underestimation may be attributed to the directivity effect, which may
produce a higher amplitude of observed ground motion in the high-frequency band. All the slip models show similar
average model deviations except for the random slip model. Finally, the peak ground accelerations and peak ground
velocities were predicted at these selected near-fault observation stations. The results indicate that the peak accelerations
and velocities obtained from seven slip models correlate well with each other, but are slightly lower than the recorded
values at most stations. In addition, the synthetized results calculated from the random and inverted slip models can be the
same level only if a greater stress drop is adopted in the random model.
Keywords Source model Site effect Response spectra Ground motion simulation Finite-fault modeling
1 Introduction
The China Earthquake Networks Center (CENC) reported
that at 12:52 on September 5, 2022, local time, a Mw 6.6
earthquake struck Luding County, Ganzi Prefecture,
Sichuan Province, China, with a focal depth of approxi-
mately 16 km and the highest intensity of IX (China
Seismic Intensity Scale). As of September 14, 2022, 118
people were killed or lost contact, and the earthquake
damaged many roads and bridges (Fan et al. 2022). The
seismogenic background of this earthquake is the Xian-
shuihe fault zone. Since 1725, 23 earthquake events with
Mw [6.0 have occurred in this fault zone (Xu et al. 2014).
The Xianshuihe fault zone is located in the southern
boundary of the Bayankala massif, which is an important
tectonic boundary of the eastern margin of the Qinghai-
&Yadong Li
liyadong@gzhu.edu.cn
1
School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, No.230
Waihuan West Road,
Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China
2
Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Underground
Infrastructural Protection in Coastal Clay Area, No.230
Waihuan West Road,
Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong Province, China
3
Earth System Science Programme. Faculty of Science, The
Chinese University of Hong Kong,
Shatin 999077, Hong Kong, China
4
School of Civil Engineering, Suzhou University of Science
and Technology, No.1701 Binhe Road,
Suzhou 215011, Jiangsu Province, China
123
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (2023) 37:2943–2960
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02427-y(0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV)
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.