Conference PaperPDF Available

Pre-conference tephra data workshop – Hands-on session II: tephra excursion, Okareka Loop Road (29 January 2023)

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

IAVCEI Scientific Assembly
Rotorua, New Zealand
29 Jan–3 Feb 2023
Commission on Tephrochronology (COT)
Pre-conference Tephra Data Workshop
Hands-on session II:
Tephra excursion, Okareka Loop Road
Sunday 29 January, Rotorua, New Zealand
Excusion leaders
David J. Lowe and Tehnuka Ilanko
School of Science, University of Waikato
Hamilton, New Zealand
2
Citation: Lowe, D.J., Ilanko, T. 2023. Pre-conference tephra data workshop Hands-on session II: tephra excursion,
Okareka Loop Road (29 January 2023). Commission on Tephrochronology, IAVCEI Scientific Assembly, Rotorua, New
Zealand. School of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton. 25 pp.
3
Itinerary and NZ tephra studies
We will travel to a section adjacent to the driveway of a pumice quarry (RNL Quarry) on Okareka Loop Rd. It
is about 8 km from the Millennium Hotel in Rotorua (Figs. 1–3). Departure is at 8.15 am from the hotel; we
aim to return by 1.00 pm. We have allowed 3–3.5 hours at the section, which is fenced off from the adjacent
roadway. We have a mid-morning refreshment and toilet break scheduled at nearby Redwood Forest Visitor
Centre (at the site marked “Redwoods Treewalk” on Fig. 1 below). Lunch location/timing to be advised.
A review of tephra studies in New Zealand has been prepared for the conference by Hopkins et al.
(2021a). The first comprehensive modern tephra database for New Zealand was developed by Hopkins et al.
(2021b). A review of gobal tephra studies, centred on the role and importance of the “Commission on
Tephrochronology”, and including aspects of New Zealand work, is provided by Lowe et al. (2022). Ages and
compositions of the main rhyolitic tephras in New Zealand younger than c. 50,000 cal yr BP are covered by
(e.g.) Smith et al. (2005), Lowe et al. (2008, 2013), Danišík et al. (2020), and Hopkins et al. (2021a, b). A
climate event stratigraphy from the NZ-INTIMATE Project is reported by Barrell et al. (2013). See also
tables and diagrams later in the field guide.
Fig. 1. Main route for today’s excursion to RNL Quarry entrance, Okareka Loop Rd.
NOTES & ILLUSTRATIONS RELATING TO
TEPHRA SECTION AT OKAREKA LOOP RD
4
Fig. 2. Topographic map of the landscape southeast of Lake Rotorua (NZ Topo Map online). Arrow indicates field site.
Fig. 3. Google Earth image showing Okareka Loop Rd and location of section at RNL quarry. The site is located at
38°10’7.19’’ S 176°19’29.25’’ E and is at ~450 m asl. Modelled mean annual rainfall is from 1525 to 1654 mm.
5
At the section, we will see tephras derived from vents centres associated with the Okareka Embayment
rhyolite domes (Fig. 4), as well as from the Tarawera Dome Complex and Rotomā Embayment (Fig. 5). These
tephras (eight in total) are shown in Figure 6.
Fig. 4. Rhyolite domes associated with the Okareka Embayment and their relationship to ‘stop 4’ = entrance to RNL
quarry. See map below for references.
Fig. 5. Okataina Volcanic Centre, including the Okataina (Haroharo) caldera complex, dome complexes and known
volcanic vents including those for the Rotorua tephra as indicated in yellow (after Nairn 2002; Cole et al. 2010, 2014).
6
a
7
Fig. 6. Annotated photographs (a–c) showing the stratigraphy and ages of units at the Loop Rd section. The stratigraphy
of pre-Rotorua tephra deposits (6c) partly follows Nairn (1992). In Fig. 6c, an angular uncomformity lies at the base of
the loess on the paleoslope alongside subhorizontal Okareka tephra. Within Okareka and Te Rere tephras, thin iron pans
and redox concentrations or segregations (Fe, Mn oxides), including blue-black pyrolusite, and redox depletions (low
chroma colours, i.e. pale grey–white colours), are secondary redoximorphic features (Hewitt et al. 2021). The shower
bedding in the Rotorua tephra contains numerous diastems (very short breaks in deposition). Photos: D.J. Lowe.
c
b
8
General stratigraphy of Okareka Loop Rd section
The following units are evident in the sequence (Fig. 6) from the base upwards:
(1) early tephras (Te Rere, 25.1 cal ka; Okareka, 23.5 cal ka) and thin interbedded loess within the
remnant top of a small, buried hill-top at the base of the sequence;
(2) the buried hill itself, the formation of which represents a period of erosion that occurred during the
last glacial period, and remnants of a (reworked?) tephra draping the (paleo)hillslope (Rerewhakaaitu,
17.6 cal ka);
(3) the thick (~4.5 m), bedded pumice lapilli tephra (with lithics) mantling the hill (Rotorua, 15.6 cal ka),
the top of which is pedogenically modified to form a distinct orange soil (this orange soil material is
evident throughout Rotorua basin and in road cuttings such as along SH 5 to the west of Rotorua); and
(4) at least four younger tephras and soil horizons overlying the buried soil on the Rotorua tephra:
Waiohau (14.0 cal ka), Rotomā (9.4 cal ka), Kaharoa (c. 1314 ± 10 CE/AD), and Rotomahana Mud
(of the Tarawera eruption, 10 June 1886).
The thick Rotorua tephra is particularly distinctive here. The source vent(s) lie to the southeast beneath
the Trig 7693 and Middle domes of the Okareka Embayment (Fig. 4). The isopach map (Fig. 7) shows how
Rotorua tephra thickens closer to the vent(s), and also that much of it was dispersed towards the northwest
(Nairn 1980). The tephra deposits to the northwest represent deposition from an early explosive phase of the
Rotorua eruption sequence (phase 1 on the isopach map) involving a ~20-km-high plinian eruption plume that
must have lasted for at least 3.5 hours, but no more than 3-4 days (Kilgour and Smith 2008). The unit A0
represents the phreatomagmatic, initial ash that is locally dispersed and not found beyond 5 km from the
inferred vent area. The second phase of the eruption sequence, which lasted for 3–6 years, involved the
growth of the Trig 7693 and Middle domes and intermittent explosive eruptions that seem to have generated
thin tephra deposits blown to the southeast (denoted as phase 2 on Fig. 7) (Kilgour and Smith 2008).
Fig. 7. Isopach map for the Rotorua tephra (modified from Kilgour and Smith 2008; Lowe et al. 1999; Shane et al. 2003
and various references for the Waikato and Auckland regions) with thicknesses in centimetres.
9
The Te Rere tephra also derives from nearby source vent(s) in the Okareka Embayment (Fig. 4) beneath
the Northern and Eastern domes (Nairn 1992). The remaining tephras seen at the Loop Rd section are from the
Tarawera Volcanic Complex, 15 km to the southeast, except the Rotomā tephra, which was derived from the
Rotomā Rhyolite Complex, 25 km to the northeast (Fig. 5). The youngest tephra is Rotomahana Mud,
deposited during the later part of the short-lived Tarawera eruption on the morning of 10 June 1886, that
forms the land surface (see Rowe et al. 2021).
Additional information, figures, and tables
Note about soil formation (pedogenesis) on tephra deposits, and importance _____________________ p09
Fig. 8. Evidence of environmental change since c. 25 cal ka __________________________________ p09
Fig. 9. Relationship between environmental conditions and the formation of allophane _____________ p10
Fig. 10. Idealized model of the relative depth of burial of paleosols and their alteration _____________ p11
Fig. 11. Diagram illustrating retardant vs. developmental upbuilding pedogenesis _________________ p12
Fig. 12. Tarawera eruption and tephra isopach maps ________________________________________ p13
Fig. 13. Isopach map, Kaharoa tephra ____________________________________________________ p14
Table 1. Main rhyolitic tephras of Rotorua-Tarawera area ≤25.4 cal ka __________________________ p15
Table 2. Marker tephras of NZ, mineralogical assemblages, eruption temperatures, oxygen fugacity ___ p16
Table 3. Glass major element compositions of NZ marker tephras _____________________________ p17
Fig. 14. Taupō Volcanic Zone and Bay of Plenty relief map __________________________________ p19
Fig. 15. Map of tephra-producing centres of the North Island, NZ _____________________________ p20
Fig. 16. Stratigraphy, ages, and volumes of key eruptives from rhyolitic volcanic centres ___________ p21
Fig. 17. Photo: Oturoa Road, Ngongatahā. Tephras in loess deposits allow dating of climate events ___ p22
References _________________________________________________________________________ p22
Acknowledgements __________________________________________________________________ p25
Note about soil formation (pedogenesis) on tephra deposits, and stratigraphic importance
A distinctive feature of many tephra-derived soils is the multilayered nature of their profiles which attests to
building up the landscape via the deposition of tephras from numerous eruptions. The notes below mainly
follow Hopkins et al. 2021a (p. 178–180).
Soils of the region are described by Rijkse (1979) and S-MAP ONLINE
(https://smap.landcareresearch.co.nz/). The dominant weathering product in them is the nanocrystalline
mineral, allophane ferrihyrite), together with halloysite formed under drier climates on older deposits
(Churchman and Lowe 2012; McDaniel at al. 2012; Hewitt et al. 2021) (Figs. 8 and 9). Where allophane
predominates, Allophanic Soils (New Zealand Soil Classification: Hewitt et al. 2010, 2021) or Andisols (Soil
Taxonomy: McDaniel et al. 2012; Soil Survey Staff 2022) are the usual high-level classifications (orders).
Fig. 8. Evidence of environmental change since c. 25 cal ka based on phytolith and clay mineral data from analyses of
buried soil horizons on rhyolitic tephras at Te Ngae, near Rotorua (after Churchman and Lowe 2012).
10
Fig. 9. Relationship between environmental conditions and the formation of allophane and other minerals on tephra
deposits (and some other materials) according to the silicon-leaching model and the availability of aluminium (from
Hewitt et al. 2021, after Churchman and Lowe 2012).
Almost all soil textbooks describe only the ‘classical’ formation of soil horizons in a profile through
various processes that gradually deepen the profile as a downward moving ‘front’ on a pre-existing parent
material on a stable land surface with nil (or negligible) additions to the surface. Such soil formation, referred
to as topdown pedogenesis, proceeds by effectively modifying a pre-existing parent material to a greater or
lesser extent according to a range of factors that dictate a range of processes and their impacts. In such a
scenario, the soil profile originates via a two-step process: step 1, accumulation (or exhumation) of a ‘new’
parent material at the land surface, followed by step 2, the modification of the parent material by soil-forming
processes and weathering, the latter mainly involving the dissolution of glass and crystals by hydrolysis and
precipitation of the dissolution products as clays (Fig. 9) (e.g., Hodder et al. 1990; Churchman and Lowe
2012) to form soil horizons, thus generating a soil profile.
However, in North Island landscapes where tephras have been repeatedly deposited, many of the soils are
formed by upbuilding pedogenesis. This is the ongoing formation of soil via topdown processes whilst tephras
(or loess, alluvium, etc) are simultaneously added to the land surface. In this scenario, step 1 and step 2 occur
together (not sequentially) so that the soil profile deepens as the land surface rises concomitantly over time.
The profiles become multi-layered soils that reflect this interplay of geological versus pedological processes
(Cronin et al. 1996; Lowe and Tonkin 2010; McDaniel et al. 2012; Hewitt et al. 2021). The frequency and
thickness of tephra accumulation, and other factors, determine how much impact topdown processes have on
the ensuing soil-horizon development and profile character. Where a thick tephra layer is deposited (e.g., ~50
cm or more), or the rate of accumulation of multiple thin additions is exceptionally rapid, the antecedent soil
is suddenly buried and isolated at depth (becoming a buried paleosol) (Fig. 10), and soil formation begins
again on the fresh materials at the new land surface. This process is retardant upbuilding pedogenesis
(because the original soil’s development has been permanently ‘retarded’ by its sudden/rapid burial).
11
Fig. 10. Idealized model of the relative depth of burial of paleosols and their alteration by pedogenic processes acting
from the surface downwards (arrows). Once a paleosol is isolated by relatively deep burial, any changes may be regarded
as largely diagenetic, not pedogenetic (Churchman and Lowe 2012) (modified after Schaetzl and Sorenson 1987).
In other situations, typically at distal sites where individual tephra-fall beds are usually thin (a few
millimetres or centimetres in thickness), the rate of accumulation is incremental and sufficiently slow to allow
topdown pedogenesis to keep operating as the land slowly rises. This process is developmental upbuilding
pedogenesis. Figure 11 illustrates these two ‘end members’ (retardant vs developmental) of upbuilding
pedogenesis.
The pivotal concept – concurrent deposition and pedogenesis – was originally proposed by Taylor (1933,
p. 195), who stated that ‘soil-forming processes are continuous during the ‘slow addition of dust from
eruptions of the intermittent type’. Thus, topdown pedogenesis continues whilst thin tephras and cryptotephras
accumulate but its impacts are lessened because any one position in the sequence is not exposed to surface-
dominated pedogenesis for long before it becomes buried too deeply for these processes to be effective
(Hewitt et al. 2021). Thin tephra layers preserved in sediments of nearby lakes or bogs provide unequivocal
evidence of persistent incremental tephra accretion to adjacent soil/land surfaces (Fig. 11, far right) (e.g.,
Alloway et al. 1992; Selby and Lowe 1992; Damaschke et al. 2017; Lowe 2019). This history thus leaves the
profile with a weakly-weathered soil fabric inherited from when the tephra deposits were being modified at
the surface as part of an A and/or upper subsoil (AC, AB, or Bw) horizon. The terms ‘developmental’ and
‘retardant’ upbuilding were coined by Johnson and Watson-Stegner (1987) and Johnson et al. (1990) as part of
their dynamic-rate model of soil evolution whereby soils are envisaged to evolve by ‘ebb and flow’ through
time (Schaetzl and Thompson 2015).
Note that buried soil horizons, even when only very weakly weathered, mark soil formation that took
place when the tephra was at the land surface and stratigraphically represent a disconformity; the boundary
between the top of a buried soil and the succeeding tephra deposit is a paraconformity that marks a period of
non-deposition (Neall 1972; Howorth 1975; Hopkins et al. 2021a).
12
Can you see how the Okareka Loop Rd sequence displays the impacts of upbuilding pedogenesis, and
how the buried soil horizons mark the passage of time and thus represent unconformities?
Fig. 11. Diagram illustrating the difference between retardant upbuilding pedogenesis (Rotomahana soil at left) at Brett
Rd versus mainly developmental upbuilding pedogenesis (Tirau soil at right) at Tapapa Rd, and how these differences
relate generally to tephra thickness and distance of site from volcanic sources. Tephra thicknesses usually decline
exponentially away from source. Stratigraphy is after Huang et al. (2021). Core depicted at far right represents tephra
layers (some of which are named) preserved in Lake Okoroire, which is ~10 km from the Tapapa Rd profile (Lowe
1988). Tephra abbreviations: Tr, Tarawera (Rotomahana Mud); Ka, Kaharoa; Tp, Taupo; Wo, Whakaipo (c. 2.8 cal ka);
Wk, Whakatane; Ma, Mamaku; Op, Opepe (c. 10.0 cal ka); Rm, Rotomā; Wh, Waiohau; Rr, Rotorua; Rk,
Rerewhakaaitu; Ok, Okareka; Kk, Kawakawa (Oruanui) (see Table 1). L = loess.
Mainly retardant upbuilding pedogenesis
The Rotomahana soil at Brett Rd, which is adjacent to Lake Rerewhakaaitu near Mt Tarawera, represents essentially a
stack of ‘mini’ soil profiles (each a buried paleosol), one atop the other. Five such ‘mini soil profiles’ are evident in the
photo as indicated.
Mainly developmental upbuilding pedogenesis
The Tirau soil at Tapapa Rd, which is in the eastern Waikato region and ‘upwind’ of the main tephra source volcanoes,
represents mainly incremental, slow additions of tephra and/or loess to the land surface so that (weak) topdown
pedogenesis has effectively kept pacee as the land gradually rises. The rate of addition of tephra and loess to the land
surface since Kawakawa tephra (Kk) was deposited averages ~6 mm per century (i.e. ~1500 mm in 25,400 cal yrs),
comparable to slow loess deposition in some parts of New Zealand. A corollary is that every part of the profile (above
Kk) has been a soil A horizon at one time.
13
Fig. 12a. Map of Tarawera area showing locations of the main craters of the 10 June 1886 fissure eruption across
Tarawera Volcanic Complex, Rotomahana Crater (including pre-eruption lakes Rotomahana and Rotomakariri), and
Waimangu craters (after Lowe et al. 2002). Locations of villages and associated fatalities (numbers in parentheses, total
~120) are based on Keam (1988) and Lowe et al. (2001) (there was an additional death at an unknown locality). Fatalities
were all Māori apart from six Europeans at Te Wairoa and one European and three Māori at Waingongongo. On the night
of the eruption nearly half of Te Ariki’s 27 residents were camped at Pink Terrace (Te Otukapuarangi). Inset shows
eastern North Island and documented limits of tephra fallout from the eruption (based on maps by Thomas 1888). Ash
fell on several ships at sea, the farthest being Julia Pryce (c. 300 km) and S.S. Waimea (c. 1000 km) north of North
Island (Keam 1988). Lorrey and Wolley (2018) used historic data recorded during Ferdinand v. Hochstetter’s 1859
survey to locate the sites of Lake Rotomahana’s former sinter terraces (see also de Ronde et al. 2016, 2019; Keir 2019).
Fig. 12b. Isopach map of 1886 Tarawera scoria fallout (in cm). x = location
where scoria occurs mixed with Rotomahana Mud but does not form a discrete
layer (from Walker et al. 1984). See also Rowe et al. (2021).
14
Fig. 13. Isopach map of Kaharoa tephra fallout blown firstly southeastward then northwestward to generate the elongated
lobate fallout pattern (after Pullar et al. 1977; Lowe et al. 1998; Sahetapy-Engel et al. 2014; Ratcliffe et al. 2020).
Magma types based on Smith et al. (2005) and Shane et al. (2008) (see Table 3). The tephra isochron has been extended
using cryptotephra occurrences in peats and lake sediments in the Waikato and Auckland regions (Gehrels et al. 2010;
Newnham et al. 2018; unpublished data). The Kaharoa tephra provides an aproximate settlement datum in northern New
Zealand for early Polynesian arrival in the late 13th century CE (Newnham et al. 1998; Hogg et al. 2003; Lowe and
Newnham 2004; Hopkins et al. 2021a).
15
Table 1 Summary of main rhyolitic tephras deposited in the Rotorua-Tarawera region during the last c. 25,400 cal years
and their general physical properties.
Name*
(
s
ource volcano)
Date or age
Description
Tarawera Tephra (Tr)
(Tarawera)
10 June 1886 Comprises basaltic scoria (Tarawera Scoria) with occasional
rhyolite clasts and/or fine greyish brown ‘muddy’ ash
(Rotomahana Mud). Mud was dispersed more widely than
the scoria.
Kaharoa Tephra (Ka)
(Tarawera)
1314 ± 12 CE/AD
(636 ± 12
cal yr BP)
Fine to coarse white to grey ash, with occasional dense
(hard, hard-to-crush) pumice, rhyolite, obsidian and basalt
lapilli. Contains abundant biotite. Black A horizon (contains
charcoal from Pol
y
nesian and/or earl
y
European burnin
g
)
Taupo Tephra (also known
as Unit Y) (Tp)
(Taupo)
232 ± 10 CE/AD
(1718 ± 10
cal
y
r BP)
Creamy coloured coarse ash with plentiful shower-bedded
pumice lapilli (crushable). Non-welded ignimbrite unit
always associated with charcoal fragments.
Whakatane Tephra (Wk)
(Haroharo)
5526 ± 145
cal yr BP
Shower-bedded pale yellow coarse ash, overlying a fine to
coarse rhyolitic (pale grey) ash. Rich in cummingtonite.
Reddish-brown uppermost horizon (sometimes with basaltic
Rotokawau tephra c. 4 cal ka).
Mamaku Tephra (Ma)
(Haroharo)
7940 ± 257
cal yr BP
Loose, coarse yellowish-brown pumice ash grading into a
weakly shower bedded coarse ash/lapilli.
Rotoma Tephra (Rm)
(Haraharo)
9423 ± 120
cal yr BP
Shower-bedded fine grey to yellowish brown ash with coarse
ash layers, cummingtonite. Marked by a dark Ah horizon at
top, sometimes with charcoal, or podzolised.
Waiohau Tephra (Wh)
(Tarawera)
14,009 ± 155
cal yr BP
Grey fine and coarse shower-bedded ash. Distinctive v. fine
cream ash layer at the base. Usually has well developed
yellowish-brown or greyish upper soil horizon. Deposited a
few centuries before late-glacial cool episode (NZce-3)§.
Rotorua Tephra (Rr)
(Okareka embayment)
15,635 ± 412
cal yr BP
Shower-bedded pumiceous yellowish lapilli or blocks
(gravel/cobbles). Occasional rhyolitic lithics. Deposited at
start of late-
g
lacial mild episode (NZce-4).
Rerewhakaaitu Tephra
(Rk)
(Tarawera)
17,496 ± 462
cal yr BP
Yellowish-brown ash grading down into tephric loess.
Contains abundant biotite. Marks transition from Last
Glacial to post-glacial conditions (Termination I);
reafforestation of re
g
ion occurred soon after deposition.
Okareka Tephra (Ok)
(Tarawera)
23,535 ± 300
cal yr BP
Yellowish brown ash contains abundant biotite. Typically
encased in yellowish to olive brown tephric loess.
Te Rere Tephra (Te)
(Okareka embayment)
25,171 ± 964
cal yr BP
Yellowish-brown ash (typically encased in yellowish to olive
brown tephric loess).
Kawakawa Tephra (Kk)
(also known as Oruanui)
(Taupo)
25,358 ± 162
cal yr BP
Olive brown to pale yellowish-brown ash (typically encased
in yellowish to olive brown tephric loess), always fine
grained and somewhat ‘sticky’ in situ. Deposited just before
interstadial D (NZce-9). Product of a supereruption (Barker
et al. 2021).
*Terminology is based mainly on Froggatt and Lowe (1990) and Wilson (1993, 2001). Bayesian-modelled ages mainly
from Lowe et al. (2013), Vandergoes et al. (2013), and Peti et al. (2021). Descriptions generalised because character may
differ from proximal to distal locations and from site to site. The region has additionally received distal tephras from
Taupō and Tuhua (Mayor Island) volcanic centres (Fig. 13) and has been ‘dusted’ regularly with andesitic tephra fallout
from numerous eruptions at Tongariro Volcanic Centre and Egmont Volcano (Taranaki Maunga), most recently in the
1995-96 Ruapehu eruptions.
Ages are given in calibrated or calendar (cal) years (95% probability range) before present (BP), ‘present’ being
1950 in the 14C timescale. Calendar dates for the Kaharoa and Taupō eruptions have been determined by
dendrochronology and 14C wiggle-match dating (Hogg et al. 2003, 2012, 2019). An age is reported in years BP (e.g.,
14,000 cal yr BP) whereas a date is a calendrical date (e.g., 1314 CE/AD). Note: ka = x1000 years (e.g., 14 cal ka =
14,000 cal yr ago).
§NZ climate event stratigraphy of Barrell et al. (2013)
16
Table 2 Ferromagnesian mineralogical assemblages and magma temperatures and oxygen fugacities of 22 marker
tephras erupted since c. 30,000 cal. yr BP in New Zealand (from Lowe et al. 2008).
Tephra name Relative abundances of
ferromagnesian mineralsa
Eruption
temperatureb
(° C)
Oxygen
fugacity fO2
(NNO)c
Taupo Volcanic Centre (rhyolitic) (see Fig. 6)
Taupo (Unit Y) Opx >> Cpx 862 ± 17 -0.17 ± 0.11
Whakaipo (Unit V) Opx 785 ± 10 -1.06 ± 0.12
Waimihia (Unit S) Opx >> Hbe 816 ± 10 -0.72 ± 0.08
Unit
K
Opx 822 ± 16 -0.59 ± 0.11
Opepe (Unit E) Opx >> Cpx 812 ± 18 -0.54 ± 0.17
Poronui (Unit C) Opx >> Cpx
Karapiti (Unit B) Opx >> Cpx + Hbe 788 ± 33 -0.75 ± 0.24
Kawakawa/Oruanui Opx > Hbe 774 ± 12 -0.14 ± 0.10
Poihipi Opx > Hbe > Bio 771 ± 6 0.07 ± 0.10
Okaia Opx > Hbe 789 ± 17 0.21 ± 0.09
Okataina Volcanic Centre (rhyolitic)
Kaharoa T1
T2
Bio >> Hbe >> Cgt ± Opx
Bio >> Cgt > Hbe ± Opx
731 ± 10 0.09 ± 0.14
Whakatane T1
T2
T3
Hbe > Cgt > Opx
Hbe > Cgt > Opx
Opx > Hbe > Cgt
746 ± 13
737 ± 9
770 ± 5
0.33 ± 0.09
0.29 ± 0.11
0.52 ± 0.05
Mamaku Hbe > Opx >> ± Cgt 735 ± 19 0.18 ± 0.13
Rotoma T1
T2
T3
Cgt > Hbe > Opx
Hbe > Opx > Cgt
Opx > Hbe > Cgt
752 ± 19
752 ± 19
752 ± 19
0.47 ± 0.12
0.47 ± 0.12
0.47 ± 0.12
Waiohau Opx > Hbe 762 ± 23 0.36 ± 0.22
Rotorua T1
T2
Opx > Hbe >> Cpx
Bio > Hbe >> Opx
871 ± 10
745 ± 30
1.11 ± 0.13
0.17 ± 0.20
Rerewhakaaitu T1
T2
T3
Opx > Hbe
Hbe + Bio >> Opx
Opx > Hbe
721
750 ± 18
-0.31
0.43 ± 0.14
Okareka T1
T2
T3
Opx + Hbe >> Cgt
Hbe + Bio >> Opx
Opx > Hbe
759 ± 20
724 ± 14
794 ± 12
0.30 ± 0.20
0.05 ± 0.15
0.82 ± 0.08
Te Rere T1
T2
T3
Opx + Hbe
Opx + Hbe + Bio > Cpx
Opx + Hbe
801 ± 24
708 ± 3
1.43 ± 0.16
-0.07 ± 0.01
Tuhua Volcanic Centre (peralkaline rhyolitic)
Tuhua Aeg > Cpx > Opx ± Aen ± Rie ±
Hbe ± Olv(fa) ± Tuh
Tongariro Volcanic Centre (andesitic)
Okupata Opx > Cpx >> ± Olv(fo) ± Hbe ~900-1100
Egmont Volcano (Taranaki Maunga) (andesitic)
Konini Hbe > Cpx >> ± Opx ~950
17
Footnotes Table 2
aOpx, orthopyroxene (mainly hypersthene); Cpx, clinopyroxene (mainly augite); Hbe, hornblende; Cgt, cummingtonite;
Bio, biotite; Aeg, aegirine; Aen, aenigmatite; Rie, riebekite; Olv, olivine (fa, fayalite; fo, forsterite); Tuh, tuhualite.
bPre-eruption temperature data (mean ± 1 standard deviation).
cOxygen fugacity data reported in NNO units relative to the NiNiO buffer.
dT1–T3 represent separate magma types (early to late eruptive phases, respectively) identified by Smith et al. (2005) for
some Okataina eruptive episodes.
Table 3 Glass major element compositions of 22 tephras erupted since c. 30 cal ka (from Lowe et al. 2008).
18
19
Fig. 14. Topographic relief model illustrating the broad physiographic regions in the Bay of Plenty-Taupō region. The
‘geomorphic’ Taupō Volcanic Zone (TVZ) comprises an area of largely volcanic hills and lakes and covers a similar area
(but not exactly equivalent) to the ‘volcanologic’ TVZ (defined by vent locations only) (from Leonard et al. 2010).
20
Fig. 15. Map of North Island showing the locations and ages of most of the main tephra-producing calderas, volcanic
centres, fields, or stratovolcanoes (cones) active during the Quaternary or shortly before (from Hopkins et al. 2021a). The
calderas in central Taupō Volcanic Zone (TVZ) are overwhelmingly rhyolitic with Mangakino and Tau being
supervolcanoes; Taranaki Maunga and Tongariro Volcanic Centre are andesitic; Tuhua (Mayor Island) is peralkaline
rhyolite; and the locally distributed tephras from Auckland Volcanic Field are basaltic. The plate tectonic setting
(Leonard et al. 2010) and various other features are also shown, including marine core locations in which tephra-fall
deposits (including some cryptotephras) have been recorded. BF, buried forest at Pureora (see Hogg et al. 2012, 2019;
Lowe and Pittari 2021); H, Haroharo Volcanic Complex; T, Tarawera Volcanic Complex.
21
Fig. 16. Stratigraphy, ages, and volumes (dense-rock equivalent, DRE) of eruptives derived from three rhyolitic centres
in central TVZ (Okataina, Taupō, Maroa), and from Mayor Island (Tuhua), since ~50 cal ka. One eruptive (Earthquake
Flat) from Kapenga Volcanic Centre is additionally depicted within the early eruptives of the Okataina sequence. From
Hopkins et al. (2021a).
22
Fig. 17. Grey loess deposits ~4 m thick on Oturoa Road near Ngongatahā that were deposited in the last glacial coldest
period between c. 31,500 and c. 15,600 years ago. Such loess is widespread around the Rotorua region. Named tephra
layers provide ages (in thousands of years ago) for New Zealand climate events (NZce) 10, 8, and 6, being the coldest
periods or stadials (Barrell et al. 2013). From Lowe et al. (2012, 2015). Age on Okareka tephra from Peti et al. (2021).
Rerewh. = Rerewhakaaitu.
Based on calculations from 18 sites throughout New Zealand, and assuming minimal loss by erosion or dissolution,
net accretion rates of loess since the eruption of Kawakawa (Oruanui) tephra c. 25,400 cal yr BP, and prior to the
Holocene, have mostly been c. 3–10 mm per century (Lowe et al. 2015). The fastest rates are 15–25 mm per century
where deposition was enhanced by turbulence, and the slowest is <1 mm per century (Eden and Hammond 2003). Rates
of incremental loess accumulation – during which topdown pedogenesis continues – at this site and others in the Rotorua
basin range from an average 5 mm per century (between Unit L and Kawakawa tephra), to 20–25 mm per century (from
Kawakawa to Rerewhakaaitu tephra). At other sites loess deposition continued until the Holocene at an average of 10
mm per century (after Rerewhakaitu tephra) (Lowe et al. 2012). These rates (~5–25 mm per century) are sufficiently
slow for topdown soil-forming processes to continue to operate as the land surface gradually rises ‘millimetre by
millimetre’, generating subsoil features that are only weakly developed. Such loess is thus a sediment-soil (Lowe and
Tonkin 2010).
References
Alloway, B.V., McGlone, M.S., Neall, V.E., Vucetich, C.G. 1992. The role of Egmont-sourced tephra in evaluating the
paleoclimatic correspondence between the bio- and soil-stratigraphic records of central Taranaki, New Zealand.
Quaternary International 13–14, 187-194.
Barker, S.J., Wilson, C.J.N., Illsley-Kemp, F., Leonard, G.S., Mestel, E.R., Mauriohooho, K., Charlier, BL. 2021. Taupō:
an overview of New Zealand’s youngest supervolcano. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 64, 320-
346.
Barrell, D.J.A., Almond, P.C., Vandergoes, M.J., Lowe, D.J., Newnham, R.M., NZ-INTIMATE members 2013. A
composite pollen-based stratotype for inter-regional evaluation of climatic events in New Zealand over the past
30,000 years (NZ-INTIMATE project). Quaternary Science Reviews 74, 4-20.
Churchman, G.J., Lowe, D.J. 2012. Alteration, formation, and occurrence of minerals in soils. In: Huang, P.M., Li, Y.,
Sumner, M.E. (eds) Handbook of Soil Sciences, 2nd ed. Vol. 1: Properties and Processes. CRC Press (Taylor &
Francis), Boca Raton, FL, p. 20.1-20.72.
23
Cole, J.W., Spinks, K.D., Deering, C.D., Nairn, I.A., Leonard, G.S. 2010. Volcanic and structural evolution of the
Okataina Volcanic Centre; dominantly silicic volcanism associated with the Taupo Rift, New Zealand. Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research 190, 123-135.
Cole, J.W., Deering, C.D., Nairn, Burt, R.M., Sewell, S., Shane, P.A.R., Matthews, N.E. 2014. Okataina Volcanic
Centre, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand: a review of volcanism and synchronous pluton development in an
active, dominantly silicic caldera system. Earth-science Reviews 128, 1-17.
Cronin D.J., Neall V.E., Palmer A.S. 1996. Investigation of an aggrading paleosol developed into andesitic ring-plain
deposits, Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand. Geoderma 69, 119-135.
Damaschke, M., Cronin, S.J., Holt, K.A., Bebbington, M.S., Hogg, A.G. 2017. A 30,000 yr high-precision eruption
history for the andesitic Mt. Taranaki, North Island, New Zealand. Quaternary Research 87, 1-23.
Danišík, M., Lowe, D.J., Schmitt, A.K., Friedrichs, B., Hogg, A.G., Evans, N.J. 2020. Sub-millennial eruptive recurrence
in the silicic Mangaone Subgroup tephra sequence, New Zealand, from Bayesian modelling of zircon double-dating
and radiocarbon ages. Quaternary Science Reviews 246, 106517.
de Ronde, C.E.J., Fornarib, D.J., Ferrinic, V.L., Walkerd, S.L., Davy, B.W., LeBlanca, C., CaratoriTontinia, F., Kukulya,
A.L., Littlefield, R.H. 2016. The Pink and White Terraces of Lake Rotomahana: what was their fate after the 1886
Tarawera Rift eruption? Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 314, 126-141.
de Ronde, C.E.J., Caratori Tontini, F., Keam, R.F. 2019. Where are the Pink and White Terraces of Lake Rotomahana?
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 49, 36-59.
Eden, D.N., Hammond, A.P. 2003. Dust accumulation in the New Zealand region since the last glacial maximum.
Quaternary Science Reviews 22, 2037-2052.
Froggatt, P.C., Lowe, D.J., 1990. A review of late Quaternary silicic and some other tephra formations from New
Zealand: their stratigraphy, nomenclature, distribution, volume, and age. New Zealand Journal of Geology and
Geophysics 33, 89-109.
Gehrels, M.J., Lowe, D.J., Newnham, R.M., Hogg, A.G. 2010. Enhanced record of tephra fallout since ~232 AD revealed
by cryptotephra studies at Moanatuatua bog near Hamilton: implications for volcanic hazard analysis. Abstracts,
GeoNZ 2010 Conference, Auckland. Geosciences Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication 129A, p. 103.
Hewitt, A.E. 2010. New Zealand Soil Classification, 3rd ed. Landcare Research Science Series 1, 136 pp.
Hewitt, A.E., Balks, M.R., Lowe, D.J. 2021. The Soils of Aotearoa New Zealand (1st ed). Springer, Cham, xx + 332 pp.
Hodder, A.P.W., Green, B.E., Lowe, D.J. 1990. A two-stage model for the formation of clay minerals from tephra-
derived volcanic glass. Clay Minerals 25, 313-327.
Hogg, A.G., Higham, T.F.G., Lowe, D.J., Palmer, J., Reimer, P., Newnham, R.M. 2003. A wiggle-match date for
Polynesian settlement of New Zealand. Antiquity 77, 116-125.
Hogg, A.G., Lowe, D.J., Palmer, J.G., Boswijk, G., Bronk Ramsey, C.J. 2012. Revised calendar date for the Taupo
eruption derived by 14C wiggle-matching using a New Zealand kauri 14C calibration data set. The Holocene 22, 439-
449.
Hogg, A.G., Wilson, C.J.N., Lowe, D.J., Turney, C.S.M., White, P., Lorrey, A.M., Manning, S.W., Palmer, J.G., Bury,
S., Brown, J., Southon, J., Petchey, F. 2019. Wiggle-match radiocarbon dating of the Taupo eruption. Nature
Communications 10, 4669. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12532-8
Hopkins, J.L., Lowe, D.J., Horrocks, J.H. 2021a. Tephrochronology in Aotearoa New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of
Geology and Geophysics 64, 153-200.
Hopkins, J.L., Bidmead, J.E., Lowe, D.J., Wysoczanski, R.J., Pillans, B.J., Ashworth, L., Rees, A.B.H., Tuckett, F.
2021b. TephraNZ: a major- and trace-element reference dataset for glass-shard analyses from prominent Quaternary
rhyolitic tephras in New Zealand and implications for correlation. Geochronology 3, 465-504.
https://gchron.copernicus.org/preprints/gchron-2020-34/gchron-2020-34.pdf
Howorth, R. 1975. New formations of late Pleistocene tephras from the Okataina Volcanic Centre, New Zealand. New
Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 18, 683-712.
Huang, D.Y.-T., Lowe, D.J., Churchman, G.J., Schipper, L.A., Cooper, A., Chen, T.-Y., Rawlence, N.J. 2021.
Characterizing porous microaggregates and soil organic matter sequestered in allophanic paleosols on Holocene
tephras using synchrotron-based X-ray microscopy and spectroscopy. Nature Scientific Reports 11, 21310.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00109-9
Johnson, D.L., Watson-Stegner, D. 1987. Evolution model of pedogenesis. Soil Science 143, 349366.
Johnson, D.L., Keller, E.A., Rockwell, T.K. 1990. Dynamic pedogenesis: new views on some key soil concepts, and a
model for interpreting Quaternary soils. Quaternary Research 33, 306-319.
Keam, R.F. 1988. Tarawera. Published by R.F. Keam, Auckland. 472 pp.
Keir, B. 2019. The location of the Pink and White Terraces of Lake Rotomahana, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal
Society of New Zealand 49, 16-35.
Kilgour, G.N., Smith, R.T. 2008. Stratigraphy, dynamics, and eruption impacts of the dual magma Rotorua eruptive
episode, Okataina Volcanic Centre, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 51, 367-378.
24
Leonard, G.S., Begg, J.G., Wilson, C.J.J. (compilers) 2010. Geology of the Rotorua area: scale 1: 250,000. Institute of
Geological and Nuclear Sciences 1: 250,000 geological map 5. 1 sheet and 99 pp. Institute of Geological and Nuclear
Sciences, Lower Hutt.
Lorrey, A.M., Woolley, J.-M. 2018. Locating relict sinter terrace sites at Lake Rotomahana, New Zealand, with
Ferdinand von Hochstetter’s legacy cartography, historic maps, and LIDAR. Frontiers in Earth Science 6, 205.
Lowe, D.J. 1988. Stratigraphy, age, composition, and correlation of late Quaternary tephras interbedded with organic
sediments in Waikato lakes, North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 31, 125-
165.
Lowe, D.J. 2019. Using soil stratigraphy and tephrochronology to understand the origin, age, and classification of a
unique Late Quaternary tephra-derived Ultisol in Aotearoa New Zealand. Quaternary 2 (1), 9.
https://doi.org/10.3390/quat2010009
Lowe, D.J., Newnham, R.M. 2004. Role of tephra in dating Polynesian settlement and impact, New Zealand. Past Global
Changes 12 (3), 5-7.
Lowe, D.J., Pittari, A. 2021. The Taupō eruption sequence of AD 232 ± 10 in Aotearoa New Zealand: a retrospection.
Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi) 130 (1), 117-141.
Lowe, D.J., Keam, R., Lee, D. 2001. How many deaths were caused by the Tarawera eruption? Geological Society of
New Zealand Newsletter 126, 18-20.
Lowe, D.J., Tonkin, P.J. 2010. Unravelling upbuilding pedogenesis in tephra and loess sequences in New Zealand using
tephrochronology. In: Gilkes, R.J., Prakongkep, N. (eds) Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Science
“Soil Solutions for a Changing World” (1-6 August 2010, Brisbane), Symposium 1.3.2 Geochronological techniques
and soil formation, p. 34-37. Published at http://www.iuss.org
Lowe, D.J., McFadgen, B.G., Higham, T.F.G., Hogg, A.G. Froggatt, P.C. Nairn, I.A. 1998. Radiocarbon age of the
Kaharoa Tephra, a key marker for late-Holocene stratigraphy and archaeology in New Zealand. The Holocene 8, 487-
495.
Lowe, D.J., Newnham, R.M., Ward, C.M. 1999. Stratigraphy and chronology of a 15 ka sequence of multi-sourced silicic
tephras in a montane peat bog, eastern North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics
42, 565-579.
Lowe, D.J., Newnham, R.M., McCraw, J.D. 2002. Volcanism and early Maori society in New Zealand. In: Torrence, R.,
Grattan, J. (eds) Natural Disasters and Cultural Change. Routledge, London, p. 126-161.
Lowe, D.J., Shane, P.A.R., Alloway, B.V., Newnham, R.M. 2008. Fingerprints and age models for widespread New
Zealand tephra marker beds erupted since 30,000 years ago: a framework for NZ-INTIMATE. Quaternary Science
Reviews 27, 95-126.
Lowe, D.J., Lanigan, K.M., Palmer, D.J. 2012. Where geology meets pedology: Late Quaternary tephras, loess, and
paleosols in the Mamaku Plateau and Lake Rerewhakaaitu areas. In: Pittari, A. (compiler) Field Trip Guides,
Geosciences 2012 Conference, Hamilton, New Zealand. Geoscience Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous
Publication 134B, p. 2.1−2.45.
Lowe, D.J., Blaauw, M., Hogg, A.G., Newnham, R.M. 2013. Ages of 24 widespread tephras erupted since 30,000 years
ago in New Zealand, with re-evaluation of the timing and palaeoclimatic implications of the late-glacial cool episode
recorded at Kaipo bog. Quaternary Science Reviews 74, 170-194.
Lowe, D.J., Tonkin, P.J., Palmer, J., Lanigan, K., Palmer, A.S. 2015. Dusty horizons. In: Graham, I. (chief editor) A
Continent on the Move: New Zealand Geoscience Revealed, 2nd ed. Geoscience Society of New Zealand with GNS
Science, Wellington. GSNZ Miscellaneous Publication 141, p. 286-289.
Lowe, D.J., Abbott, P.M., Suzkui, T., Jensen, B.J.L. 2022. Global tephra studies: role and importance of the international
tephra research group ‘Commission on Tephrochronology’ in its first 60 years. History of Geo- and Space Sciences
13, 93–132. https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-13-93-2022
McDaniel, P.A., Lowe, D.J., Arnalds, O., Ping, C.-L. 2012. Andisols. In: Huang, P.M., Li, Y., Sumner, M.E. (eds)
Handbook of Soil Sciences, 2nd ed. Vol. 1: Properties and Processes. CRC Press (Taylor & Francis), Boca Raton, FL,
p. 33.29-33.48.
Nairn, I. A. 1980. Source, age, and eruptive mechanisms of Rotorua Ash. New Zealand Journal of Geology and
Geophysics 23, 193-207.
Nairn, I.A. 1992. The Te Rere and Okareka eruptive episodes Okataina Volcanic Centre, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New
Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 35, 93-108.
Nairn, I.A. 2002. Geology of the Okataina Volcanic Centre. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Geological
Map 25. 1 sheet + 156 pp.
Neall, V.E. 1972. Tephrochronology and tephrostratigraphy of western Taranaki (N108-N109), New Zealand. New
Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 15, 507-557.
Newnham, R.M., Lowe, D.J., McGlone, M.S., Wilmshurst, J.M., Higham, T.F.G. 1998. The Kaharoa Tephra as a critical
datum for earliest human impact in northern New Zealand. Journal of Archaeological Science 25, 533-544.
Newnham, R.M., Lowe, D.J., Gehrels, M.J., Augustinus, P. 2018. Two-step human−environmental impact history for
northern New Zealand linked to late-Holocene climate change. The Holocene 28, 1093-1106.
25
Peti, L., Hopkins, J.L., Augustinus, P. 2021. Revised tephrochronology for key tephras in the 130-ka Ōrākei Basin maar
core, Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand: implications for the timing of climatic changes, New Zealand. New
Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 64, 235-249.
Pullar, W.A., Kohn, B.P., Cox, J.E. 1977. Air-fall Kaharoa Ash and Taupo Pumice, and sea-rafted Loisels Pumice,
Taupo Pumice, and Leigh Pumice in northern and eastern parts of the North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand
Journal of Geology and Geophysics 20, 697-717.
Ratcliffe, J.L., Lowe, D.J., Schipper, L.A., Gehrels, M.J., French, A., Campbell, D.I. 2020. Rapid carbon
accumulation in a peatland following Late Holocene tephra deposition, New Zealand. Quaternary Science
Reviews 246,106505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106505
Rijkse, W.C. 1979. Soils of Rotorua lakes district, North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Soil Survey Report 43. New
Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington.
Rowe, M.C., Carey, R.J., White, J.D.L., Kilgour, G., Hughes, E., Ellis, B., Rosseel, J-B., Segovia, A. 2021. Tarawera
1886: an integrated review of volcanological and geochemical characteristics of a complex basaltic eruption. New
Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 64, 296-319.
Sahetapy-Engel, S., Self, S., Carey, R.J., Nairn, I.A. 2014. Deposition and generation of multiple widespread fall units
from the c. AD 1314 Kaharoa rhyolitic eruption, Tarawera, New Zealand. Bulletin of Volcanology 76, 836.
Schatezl, R.J., Sorenson, C.J. 1987. The concept of “buried” versus “isolated” paleosols: examples from northeastern
Kansas. Soil Science 143, 426-435.
Schaetzl, R.J., Thompson, M. 2015. Soils – Genesis and Geomorphology, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 778 pp.
Selby, MJ, Lowe, DJ. 1992. The middle Waikato Basin and hills. In: Soons JM, Selby MJ (eds) Landforms of New
Zealand, 2nd ed. Longman Paul, Auckland, p. 233-255.
Shane, P.A.R., Smith, V.C., Lowe, D.J., Nairn, I.A. 2003. Re-identification of c. 15 700 cal yr BP tephra bed at Kaipo
Bog, eastern North Island: implications for dispersal of Rotorua and Puketarata tephra beds. New Zealand Journal of
Geology and Geophysics 46, 591-596.
Shane, P.A.R., Nairn, I.A., Martin, S.B., Smith, V.C. 2008. Compositional heterogeneity in tephra deposits resulting
from the eruption of multiple magma bodies: implications for tephrochronology. Quaternary International 178, 44-
53.
Smith, V.C., Shane, P., Nairn, I.A. 2005. Trends in rhyolite geochemistry, mineralogy, and magma storage during the last
50 kyr at Okataina and Taupo volcanic centres, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. Journal of Volcanology and
Geothermal Research 148, 372-406.
Soil Survey Staff 2022. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 13th ed. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington,
DC, 402 pp.
Taylor, N.H. 1933. Soil processes in volcanic ash-beds (parts I and II). New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology
14, 193-202 and 338-352.
Thomas, A.P.W. 1888. Report on the eruption of Tarawera and Rotomahana, New Zealand. Government Printer,
Wellington.
Vandergoes, M.J., Hogg, A.G., Lowe, D.J., Newnham, R.M., Denton, G.H., Southon, J., Barrell, D.J.A., Wilson, C.J.N.,
McGlone, M.S., Allan, A.S.R., Almond, P.C., Petchey, F., Dalbell, K., Dieffenbacher-Krall, A.C., Blaauw, M. 2013.
A revised age for the Kawakawa/Oruanui tephra, a key marker for the Last Glacial Maximum in New Zealand.
Quaternary Science Reviews 74, 195-201.
Walker, G.P.L., Self, S., Wilson, L. 1984. Tarawera 1886, New Zealand a basaltic plinian fissure eruption. Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research 21, 61-78.
Wilson, C.J.N. 1993. Stratigraphy, chronology, styles and dynamics of Late Quaternary eruptions from Taupo volcano,
New Zealand. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A343, 205-306.
Wilson, C.J.N. 2001. The 26.5 ka Oruanui eruption, New Zealand: an introduction and overview. Journal of Volcanology
and Geothermal Research 112, 133-174.
Acknowledgements
We thank RNL Quarries for providing access to the tephra section at the quarry entrance, Josh Hughes and Richard
Melchert for support with transport and section preparation, Steve Kuehn and Kristi Wallace for tephra workshop
planning and logistical support, Ellen Nelson (University of Wisconsin-Madison) for leading the StraboSpot exercise at
the outcrop, Adrian Pittari for information about the Loop Rd sequence, and Dave Palmer for providing modelled rainfall
data. In preparing this guide and leading the trip, DJL and TI acknowledge support from MBIE Endeavour Fund Smart
Ideas (grant UOWX1903), the Marsden Fund (grant UOW1902), and the Earthquake Commission (EQC) (contracts
15/U713 and BIG 012 2020). These funders and others are supporting the tephra seismites research project based at the
University of Waikato, Hamilton (https://tephra-seismites.com/). TI additionally acknowledges support from the local
organising committee that enabled her attendance as an ECR plenary speaker at the IAVCEI Scientific Assembly. The
guide is an output of the Commission on Tephrochronology (COT) of the International Association of Volcanism and
Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (IAVCEI).
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Tephrochronology is a correlational and age-equivalent dating method whereby practitioners characterize, map, and date tephra (or volcanic ash) layers and use them stratigraphically as connecting and dating tools in the geosciences (including volcanology) and in studies of past environments and archaeology. Modern tephra studies per se began around 100 years ago (in the 1920s), but the first collective of tephrochronologists with a common purpose and nascent global outlook was not formed until 7 September 1961 in Warsaw, Poland. On that date, the inaugural “Commission on Tephrochronology” (COT) was ratified under the aegis of the International Union for Quaternary Research (INQUA). The formation of COT is attributable largely to the leadership of Kunio Kobayashi of Japan, the commission's president for its first 12 years. We were motivated to record and evaluate the function and importance of COT because tephrochronology continues to grow globally and its heritage needs to be understood, appreciated, and preserved. In addition, studies on cryptotephras, which are fine-grained glass-shard and/or crystal concentrations preserved in sediments or soils but insufficiently numerous to be visible as a layer to the naked eye, have also expanded dramatically in recent times. Therefore, in this article, we review the role and impacts of COT under the umbrella of INQUA for 53 of the last 60 years or under IAVCEI (International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior) for 7 of the last 60 years, including since 2019. The commission also functioned under other names (abbreviated as COTS, CEV, ICCT, COTAV, SCOTAV, and INTAV; see Table 2 for definitions). As well as identifying key persons of influence, we describe the development of the commission, its leaders, and its activities, which include organizing nine specialist tephra field meetings in seven different countries. Members of the commission have participated in numerous other conferences (including specialist tephra sessions) or workshops of regional to international scale, and they have played leading roles in international projects such as INTIMATE (INTegrating Ice-core, MArine and TErrestrial records) and SMART (Synchronising Marine And ice-core Records using Tephrochronology). As well as strongly supporting early-career researchers including graduate students, the commission has generated 10 tephra-themed journal volumes and two books. It has published numerous other articles including field guidebooks, reports, and specialist internet documents/sites. Although its fortunes have ebbed as well as flowed, the commission began to prosper after 1987 when key changes in leadership occurred. COT has blossomed further, especially in the past decade or so, as an entire new cohort of specialists, including many engaged in cryptotephra studies, has emerged alongside new geoanalytical and dating techniques or protocols to become a vibrant global group today. We name 29 elected officers who have been involved with COT since 1961 as well as 15 honorary life members. After reviewing the aims of the commission, we conclude by evaluating its legacies and by documenting current and future work.
Article
Full-text available
Allophanic tephra‑derived soils can sequester sizable quantities of soil organic matter (SOM). However, no studies have visualized the fine internal porous structure of allophanic soil microaggregates, nor studied the carbon structure preserved in such soils or paleosols. We used synchrotron radiation‑based transmission X‑ray microscopy (TXM) to perform 3D‑tomography of the internal porous structure of dominantly allophanic soil microaggregates, and carbon near‑edge X‑ray absorption fine‑structure (C NEXAFS) spectroscopy to characterize SOM in ≤ 12,000‑year‑old tephra‑derived allophane‑rich (with minor ferrihydrite) paleosols. The TXM tomography showed a vast network of internal, tortuous nano‑pores within an allophanic microaggregate comprising nanoaggregates. SOM in the allophanic paleosols at four sites was dominated by carboxylic/carbonyl functional groups with subordinate quinonic, aromatic, and aliphatic groups. All samples exhibited similar compositions despite differences between the sites. That the SOM does not comprise specific types of functional groups through time implies that the functional groups are relict. The SOM originated at the land/soil surface: ongoing tephra deposition (intermittently or abruptly) then caused the land‑surface to rise so that the once‑surface horizons were buried more deeply and hence became increasingly isolated from inputs by the surficial/modern organic cycle. The presence of quinonic carbon, from biological processes but vulnerable to oxygen and light, indicates the exceptional protection of SOM and bio‑signals in allophanic paleosols, attributable both to the porous allophane (with ferrihydrite) aggregates that occlude the relict SOM from degradation, and to rapid burial by successive tephra‑fallout, as well as strong Al‑organic chemical bonding. TXM and C NEXAFS spectroscopy help to unravel the fine structure of soils and SOM and are of great potential for soil science studies.
Article
Full-text available
Although analyses of tephra-derived glass shards have been undertaken in New Zealand for nearly four decades (pioneered by Paul Froggatt), our study is the first to systematically develop a formal, comprehensive, open-access reference dataset of glass-shard compositions for New Zealand tephras. These data will provide an important reference tool for future studies to identify and correlate tephra deposits and for associated petrological and magma-related studies within New Zealand and beyond. Here we present the foundation dataset for TephraNZ, an open-access reference dataset for selected tephra deposits in New Zealand. Prominent, rhyolitic, tephra deposits from the Quaternary were identified, with sample collection targeting original type sites or reference locations where the tephra's identification is unequivocally known based on independent dating and/or mineralogical techniques. Glass shards were extracted from the tephra deposits, and major- and trace-element geochemical compositions were determined. We discuss in detail the data reduction process used to obtain the results and propose that future studies follow a similar protocol in order to gain comparable data. The dataset contains analyses of glass shards from 23 proximal and 27 distal tephra samples characterising 45 eruptive episodes ranging from Kaharoa (636 ± 12 cal yr BP) to the Hikuroa Pumice member (2.0 ± 0.6 Ma) from six or more caldera sources, most from the central Taupō Volcanic Zone. We report 1385 major-element analyses obtained by electron microprobe (EMPA), and 590 trace-element analyses obtained by laser ablation (LA)-ICP-MS, on individual glass shards. Using principal component analysis (PCA), Euclidean similarity coefficients, and geochemical investigation, we show that chemical compositions of glass shards from individual eruptions are commonly distinguished by major elements, especially CaO, TiO2, K2O, and FeOtt (Na2O+K2O and SiO2/K2O), but not always. For those tephras with similar glass major-element signatures, some can be distinguished using trace elements (e.g. HFSEs: Zr, Hf, Nb; LILE: Ba, Rb; REE: Eu, Tm, Dy, Y, Tb, Gd, Er, Ho, Yb, Sm) and trace-element ratios (e.g. LILE/HFSE: Ba/Th, Ba/Zr, Rb/Zr; HFSE/HREE: Zr/Y, Zr/Yb, Hf/Y; LREE/HREE: La/Yb, Ce/Yb). Geochemistry alone cannot be used to distinguish between glass shards from the following tephra groups: Taupō (Unit Y in the post-Ōruanui eruption sequence of Taupō volcano) and Waimihia (Unit S); Poronui (Unit C) and Karapiti (Unit B); Rotorua and Rerewhakaaitu; and Kawakawa/Ōruanui, and Okaia. Other characteristics, including stratigraphic relationships and age, can be used to separate and distinguish all of these otherwise-similar tephra deposits except Poronui and Karapiti. Bimodality caused by K2O variability is newly identified in Poihipi and Tahuna tephras. Using glass-shard compositions, tephra sourced from Taupō Volcanic Centre (TVC) and Mangakino Volcanic Centre (MgVC) can be separated using bivariate plots of SiO2/K2O vs. Na2O+K2O. Glass shards from tephras derived from Kapenga Volcanic Centre, Rotorua Volcanic Centre, and Whakamaru Volcanic Centre have similar major- and trace-element chemical compositions to those from the MgVC, but they can overlap with glass analyses from tephras from Taupō and Okataina volcanic centres. Specific trace elements and trace-element ratios have lower variability than the heterogeneous major-element and bimodal signatures, making them easier to fingerprint geochemically.
Article
Full-text available
The paper is freely available to download on the journal website: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jgeography/130/1/130_130.117/_article/-char/en/ The Taupō eruption, also known as eruption Y, occurred in late summer to early autumn (typically late March to early April) in AD 232 +- 10 yr at Taupō volcano, an ‘inverse’ caldera volcano underlying Lake Taupō in the central Taupō Volcanic Zone, North Island, Aotearoa New Zealand. The complex rhyolitic eruption, the most powerful eruption globally in the last 5000 years, lasted between several days and several weeks and generated five markedly contrasting pyroclastic fall deposits (units Y1 to Y5) followed by the extremely violent emplacement of a low-aspect-ratio ignimbrite (unit Y6). The fall deposits include three phreatomagmatic units, Y1, Y3, and Y4, the latter two being the products of archetypal phreatoplinian events; and two magmatic units, Y2 and Y5, the latter being the product of an exceptionally powerful plinian (previously described as ‘ultraplinian’) event with an extreme magma discharge rate around 108 to 1010 kg s-1. The pyroclastic fall-generating eruptions were followed by the climactic emplace-ment of the entirely non-welded Taupō ignimbrite (Y6). It was generated by the catastrophic collapse of the 35 to 40-km-high plinian eruption column (Y5) that produced a very-fast-moving (600 to 900 km h-1), hot (up to 500°C) pyroclastic flow (density current) that covered about 20,000 km2 of central North Island over a near-circular area ~160 km in diameter, centred on Lake Taupō, in fewer than about ten to 15 minutes. This violent ground-hugging pyroclastic flow generated its own air lubrication, forming a near-frictionless basal region, and the resultant highly fluidised ignimbrite was spread as a near-continuous but thin sheet over the entire landscape, both infilling valleys and mantling ridges. Caldera collapse formed a new basin in the older Ōruanui caldera in Lake Taupo. The pressure-wave arising from the plinian-column collapse probably generated a global volcano-meteorological tsunami. Studied intensely by extra-ordinary volcanologists Colin Wilson and George Walker, and others, the exceptionally well- preserved and readily-accessible Taupō eruptives provide a one-in-a-hundred classic sequence that is arguably the most informative in the global world of volcanology with respect to explosive rhyolitic eruptions and their products. The total volume of the Taupō eruptives amounts to ~35 km3 as magma, equivalent to ~105 km3 of bulk (loose) pyroclastic material, of which the Taupō ignimbrite comprises ~30 km3. The impacts and landscape response of the eruption were pro-found, spatially extensive, and enduring, and the young glassy soils (Vitrands in Soil Taxonomy, Pumice Soils in the New Zealand Soil Classification) developed in the silica-rich pumiceous de-posits, although well suited to plantation forestry (especially exotic Pinus radiata, pose unique problems for agriculture and other land uses, including a high susceptibility to gully erosion and an inherent deficiency in cobalt and other trace elements, and require special management.
Article
Full-text available
Contemporary measurements of carbon (C) accumulation rates in peatlands around the world often show the C sink to be stronger on average than at times in the past. Alteration of global nutrient cycles could be contributing to elevated carbon accumulation in the present day. Here we examine the effect of volcanic inputs of nutrients on peatland C accumulation in Moanatuatua Bog, New Zealand, by examining a high-resolution Late Holocene C accumulation record during which powerful volcanic eruptions occurred, depositing two visible rhyolitic tephra layers (Taupo, 232 ± 10 CE; Kaharoa, 1314 ± 12 CE). Carbon accumulation rates since c. 50 CE, well before any human presence, increased from a background rate of 23 g C m À2 yr À1 up to 110 g C m À2 yr À1 following the deposition of the Taupo Tephra, and 84 g C m À2 yr À1 following the deposition of the Kaharoa Tephra. Smaller but nevertheless marked increases in C accumulation additionally occurred in association with the deposition of three andesitic-dacitic cryp-totephras (each ~1 mm thick) of the Tufa Trig Formation between the Taupo and Kaharoa events. These five periods of elevated C uptake, especially those associated with the relatively thick Taupo and Kaharoa tephras, were accompanied by shifts in nutrient stoichiometry, indicating that there was greater availability of phosphorus (P) relative to nitrogen (N) and C during the period of high C uptake. Such P was almost certainly derived from volcanic sources, with P being present in the volcanic glass at Moana-tuatua, and many of the eruptions described being associated with the local deposition of the P rich mineral apatite. We found peatland C accumulation to be tightly coupled to N and P accumulation, suggesting nutrient inputs exert a strong control on rates of peat accumulation. Nutrient stoichiometry indicated a strong ability to recover P within the ecosystem, with C:P ratios being higher than most other peatlands in the literature. We conclude that nutrient inputs, deriving from volcanic eruptions, have been very important for C accumulation rates in the past. Therefore, the elevated nutrient inputs occurring in the present day could offer a more plausible explanation, as opposed to a climatic component, for observed high contemporary C accumulation in New Zealand peatlands.
Article
Full-text available
Taupō volcano (New Zealand) is distinguished as the source of Earth's youngest supereruption (∼25.5 ka), with Lake Taupō occupying the resulting caldera. Taupō has also produced eruptions of a wide variety of sizes, styles and associated landscape responses over a ∼350 kyr period. Early Taupō (>54 ka) is poorly demarcated, merging with Maroa to the north, and is represented by widely scattered, geochemically distinct, effusive domes and explosive eruption products from vents all around the modern lake. Taupō had two independent magmatic systems from 54–25.5 ka, one that led to the Oruanui event focussed beneath the area of the modern lake and a second, northeast of the lake that has remained active to the present. Following the Oruanui supereruption, the rebuilt modern hyperactive Taupō magmatic system is primarily focussed beneath the lake and has generated 25 rhyolitic eruptions since ∼12 ka. The young rhyolite magmas come from an evolving silicic magma reservoir, but vary widely in their eruptive sizes and destructive potential. In the modern era Taupō experiences unrest every decade or so, but uncertainties remain over the nature of the magma reservoir and the processes that drive unrest or eruptive activity that require new geophysical data and interpretations.
Article
Full-text available
In this article, I show how an Ultisol, representative of a globally-important group of soils with clay-rich subsoils, low base saturation, and low fertility, in the central Waikato region in northern North Island, can be evaluated using soil stratigraphy and tephrochronology to answer challenging questions about its genesis, age and classification. The Kainui soil, a Typic Kandiudult (Soil Taxonomy) and Buried-granular Yellow Ultic Soil (New Zealand Soil Classification), occurs on low rolling hills of Mid-Quaternary age mainly in the Hamilton lowlands in, and north and northeast of, Hamilton city. It is a composite, multi-layered tephra-derived soil consisting of two distinct parts, upper and lower. The upper part is a coverbed typically c. 0.4–0.7 m in thickness (c. 0.6 m on average) comprising numerous late Quaternary rhyolitic and andesitic tephras that have been accumulating incrementally since c. 50 ka (the age of Rotoehu Ash at the coverbed’s base) whilst simultaneously being pedogenically altered (i.e., forming soil horizons) via developmental upbuilding pedogenesis during Marine Oxygen Isotope Stages (MOIS) 3-1. Any original depositional (fall) bedding has been almost entirely masked by pedogenic alteration. Sediments in lakes aged c. 20 ka adjacent to the low hills have preserved around 40 separate, thin, macroscopic tephra-fall beds mainly rhyolitic in composition, and equivalent subaerial deposits together form the upper c. 30 cm of the coverbed. Okareka (c. 21.8 ka), Okaia (c. 28.6 ka), Tāhuna (c. 39.3 ka) and (especially) Rotoehu tephras make up the bulk of the lower c. 30 cm of the coverbed. Tephra admixing has occurred throughout the coverbed because of soil upbuilding processes. Moderately well drained, this upper profile is dominated by halloysite (not allophane) in the clay fraction because of limited desilication. In contrast, Otorohanga soils, on rolling hills to the south of Hamilton, are formed in equivalent but thicker (>c. 0.8 m) late Quaternary tephras ≤c. 50 ka that are somewhat more andesitic although predominantly rhyolitic overall. These deeper soils are well drained with strong desilication and thus are allophanic, generating Typic Hapludands. Ubiquitous redox features, together with short-lived contemporary reduction observed in the lower coverbed of a Kainui soil profile, indicate that the Kainui soil in general is likely to be saturated by perching for several days, or near saturation for several months, each year. The perching occurs because the coverbed overlies a slowly-permeable, buried, clay-rich paleosol on upper Hamilton Ash beds, >c. 50 ka in age, which makes up the lower part of the two-storeyed Kainui soil. The coverbed-paleosol boundary is a lithologic discontinuity (unconformity). Irregular in shape, it represents a tree-overturn paleosurface that may be c. 74 ka in age (MOIS 5/4 boundary). The buried paleosol is markedly altered and halloysitic with relict clay skins (forming paleo-argillic and/or paleo-kandic horizons) and redoximorphic features. It is inferred to have formed via developmental upbuilding pedogenesis during the Last Interglacial (MOIS 5e). The entire Hamilton Ash sequence, c. 3 m in thickness and overlain unconformably by Rotoehu Ash and underlain by c. 340-ka Rangitawa Tephra at the base, represents a thick composite (accretionary) set of clayey, welded paleosols developed by upbuilding pedogenesis from MOIS 10 to 5.
Article
The cataclysmic basaltic eruption of Mt. Tarawera in 1886 represents a significant cultural and scientific event for New Zealand. This review utilises published and new observations, to reinterpret eruptive parameters encompassing the entirety of the eruption. The ∼17 km eruptive fissure, active for 4+ hours, extends across Mt. Tarawera to the hydrothermally active Waimangu region. Correlating published observations of bed thickness, componentry and microtextures from Mt. Tarawera to new bed descriptions and granulometry for the Rotomahana-Waimangu rift segment allows for a re-assessment of eruption variations along the length of the fissure. Variably thick pyroclastic fall sequences at Mt. Tarawera contrast with the pyroclastic surges and an eruption plume that together deposited the ‘Rotomahana Mud’ erupted along the Rotomahana-Waimangu segment. Providing insight into pre-eruptive conditions, new mineral chemistry from Mt. Tarawera provides the first constraints on crystallisation pressures (<2 kbar), temperatures (<1100°C), and magmatic water content (<2.8 wt%). Recalculated volumes indicate a bulk eruptive volume of 1.1–1.3 km³, and a juvenile basalt volume of up to 0.67 km³, which then lead to calculated discharge rates of 3.7 × 10⁷–7.8 × 10⁷ kg s⁻¹ for the northern Mt. Tarawera segment of the fissure and 1.4–5.7 × 10⁶ kg s⁻¹ for the Rotomahana segment.
Article
Accurate dating of young (<1 Ma) volcanic eruptions has long been a challenge for modern geochronology given the scarcity of datable mineral phases and low quantities of radiogenic daughter products. Combined U–Th–Pb and (U–Th)/He dating of zircon (i.e., zircon double-dating, ZDD) is a relatively new dating approach that offers a viable option for dating zircon-bearing volcanic and pyroclastic deposits as young as ca. 3 ka, and has a great potential for application in many fields within the Quaternary sciences, including volcanology, palaeoclimatology, and archaeology. In our study, a stratigraphically and spatially well-defined sequence of 13 rhyodacitic to rhyolitic tephra beds – the Mangaone Subgroup (MSg) – erupted from the Okataina Volcanic Centre (OVC), is used as a natural laboratory to conduct a cross-validation experiment in which the ZDD eruption ages are compared with published and new radiocarbon (¹⁴C) eruption ages. These ZDD and ¹⁴C ages are then used together to underpin a Bayesian age model developed (using ChronoModel) to provide new ages for the entire MSg sequence. New ZDD eruption ages of 36.1 ± 4.4, 31.5 ± 5.2, 30.9 ± 5.6, 31.2 ± 4.4 ka BP for four MSg tephras (Units D, I, J, and K, respectively) are statistically indistinguishable from ¹⁴C-based eruption ages. These results validate the feasibility of ZDD to date late Quaternary eruptions accurately. The Bayesian age sequence model provides provides an eruptive geochronology eruptive geochronology for all 13 MSg tephra beds for the first time (and for the stratigraphically-interbedded Taupo-volcano-derived Tahuna tephra, 38.4−1.4+1.7 ka BP), and constrains the beginning of the MSg eruption period to 42.7−3.5+3.7 ka BP (Unit A) and the end to 30.6−1.5+0.6 ka BP (Unit L). Thus, the entire MSg sequence was emplaced in ∼12,100 years, representing an eruption frequency of one event per ∼930 years on average. Our study demonstrates the efficacy of ZDD to yield accurate eruption ages on pyroclastic deposits, highlighting its potential for dating young (<1 Ma) magmatic and eruption events that are difficult to date by other geochronological methods, and also shows that ZDD dates can be integrated with ¹⁴C ages using Bayesian modelling to develop new age models for long sequences of tephra beds, in this case those of the MSg tephras that were deposited during MIS 3. In addition, the U–Th zircon crystallization data revealed distinct U–Th model age spectra for older and younger MSg tephras, providing geochronological evidence for a decreasing degree of interconnectedness within the OVC magma reservoir during the MSg eruption period that followed caldera collapse associated with the pre-MSg Rotoiti (Rotoehu) eruption at ca. 45 ka BP.