ArticlePDF Available

Pediatric low bone density: when to refer

Authors:

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent disease-causing high morbidity and health-care expenditures. As bone mass structure rarely varies from that of young adulthood, it is important for early recognition of low bone density disorders during childhood. This article will differentiate the common conditions causing low bone density and help Pediatricians promptly identify the patients in need of a Pediatric Endocrinologist referral by explaining the pathophysiology, evaluation, and management of these conditions.
Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com
Abbreviations: DEXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry;
BMD, bone mineral density; BMC, bone mineral content; aBMD,
areal bone mineral density; BMAD, bone mineral apparent density;
TBLH, total body less head; VFA, vertebral fracture assessment; CP,
cerebral palsy; OI, osteogenesis imperfecta
Introduction
There are multiple medical conditions that predispose to low
bone density and fragility fractures. As a primary care provider, it is
important to recognize indications for referral to a Pediatric Endocrine
bone clinic.
Children are at a greater risk for fractures than adults. Around
42% to 64% of boys and 27% to 40% of girls can potentially develop
a fracture between birth and 16 years of age. The upper extremity
fractures, especially the forearm, are more common, as more than
65% of all long bone fractures take place in this area.1
Osteoporosis is a skeletal condition in which bone density is
low and there is increased risk for fractures. A denite indication
of osteoporosis is the presence of a vertebral compression fracture
without any underlying lesion or impactful trauma. A patient can also
be diagnosed with osteoporosis if he/she has a clinically signicant
fracture history and a bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score less than/
equal to -2.0. This can be a result of two or more long bone fractures
before 10 years of age or three or more long bone fractures before
19 years of age. Factors such as the location of the injury, imaging
features, and the clinical context should all be reviewed when
considering a complete pathology evaluation and/or diagnosis of the
disease. If choosing to proceed, the primary step is to rule out any
evidence of mineral disorders followed by evaluation for any acute or
chronic systemic illnesses. If all these tests results are reassuring, then
proceed with X-ray spine (with/without skeletal survey) and a dual-
energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan.2
Bone mineral density is a strong indicator of a patient’s overall
bone health. The dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan
can report bone mineral content (BMC), areal bone mineral density
(aBMD in gm/cm²), bone mineral apparent density (BMAD). Bone
mineral density is reported as Z-scores in pediatric subjects, in which
these scores are corrected to the height of the subject. If the Z-score
is less than or equal to -2.0 standard deviations, then it is indicative of
“low bone mineral mass or bone mineral density”. The most frequent
areas measured for assessing BMD in children are the posterior-
anterior spine and the total body score without including the head.
Distal forearm, proximal femur, lateral distal femur, and vertebral
fracture assessment can also serve as alternate sites in the case of non-
removable artifacts and/or skeletal deformities causing diculties
with positioning. Factors outside of the DEXA score are also equally
important criteria in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.2,3
As a primary care provider, it is especially important to identify
key conditions that can potentially increase the risk for low bone
mineral mass. Predisposing conditions such as cerebral palsy, long-
term use of steroids, hypogonadism, and certain genetic conditions
like osteogenesis imperfecta can negatively aect the subject’s overall
bone health and deter long-term growth.
The most common condition predisposing to low bone density
is cerebral palsy (CP). Calcium intake, medications, and weight-
bearing status are the three primary determining factors of bone
mass in these patients. Although calcium intake is typically low in
these patients, these numbers are not reected in lab results due to
compensatory mechanisms. Medications (such as anticonvulsants,
depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, etc.) can deter absorption and/
or metabolism of vital nutrients, which has a negative eect on
bone health. Bone structures are regulated by simultaneous action of
osteoblasts and osteoclast cells; the activities of these cells are highly
dependent on the weight-bearing status of the subject. It is shown that
children who are non-weight bearing have thinner, more fragile bones
than those who can walk.4 Therefore, these children are inherently at
a higher risk for developing fractures (around 4% per year) than those
who are weight-bearing. This fracture rate can increase to 7% per year
once the child develops a single fracture. Coincidingly as the child’s
bone health deteriorates, the morbidity rate increases, demonstrating
the need for early-recognition of this complication.
Long-term use of steroids can also negatively aect bone health.
Eects of long-term use of corticosteroids on skeleton include
apoptosis of all bone cells including osteoblasts, osteocytes, and
osteoclasts. Osteoblastogenesis is reduced whereas osteoclastogenesis
is increased. There is reduction in the synthesis of insulin like growth
factor-1 (IGF-1) and collagen. Bone loss can occur in two phases.
The initial 10-15% of loss happens in the rst few months of steroid
use and is followed by phases of 2-5% of bone loss yearly. A daily
prednisone dose of ≥7.5 mg for 3 months or more cause signicant
bone loss and double the risk for fractures. Inhaled steroids on a
long term can also potentially aect bone density. Patients who are
susceptible for bone loss include those who have elevated parathyroid
hormone (PTH), impaired calcium absorption, increased urinary
calcium excretion, vitamin D deciency, and acidosis.5,6
Endocrinol Metab Int J. 2022;10(1):12. 1
©2022 Sukumaran. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.
Pediatric low bone density: when to refer
Volume 10 Issue 1 - 2022
Anju Sukumaran
Associate Professor at University of Mississippi, USA
Correspondence: Anju Sukumaran MD, Associate Professor
at University of Mississippi, 2500 N state Street, University of
Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, US 39216,
Tel 6019845246, Email
Received: January 25, 2022 | Published: February 08, 2022
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent disease-causing high morbidity and health-care
expenditures. As bone mass structure rarely varies from that of young adulthood, it is
important for early recognition of low bone density disorders during childhood. This article
will dierentiate the common conditions causing low bone density and help Pediatricians
promptly identify the patients in need of a Pediatric Endocrinologist referral by explaining
the pathophysiology, evaluation, and management of these conditions.
Keywords: bone fragility, low bone density
Endocrinology & Metabolism International Journal
Short Communication Open Access
Pediatric low bone density: when to refer 2
Copyright:
©2022 Sukumaran
Citation: Sukumaran A. Pediatric low bone density: when to refer. Endocrinol Metab Int J. 2022;10(1):12. DOI: 10.15406/emij.2022.10.00311
Hypogonadism is another condition that can predispose to low bone
density. Although estrogen and androgen can both prolong osteoblast
and osteocyte survival, they shorten the lifespan of osteoclasts.
Evaluation for hypogonadism starts with checking levels of luteinizing
hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, testosterone, estradiol. This
can be managed by treating the cause and/or replacement therapy with
sex steroids, which has shown to improve bone density.7
There are certain genetic conditions that can cause low BMD such
as osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), WNT1 mutations, etc. The altered
collagen formation and deposition in these conditions cause recurrent
fractures. Biochemical tests are usually unremarkable. Bone turnover
markers are helpful only as a response to treatment and not for
diagnosis. Bisphosphonate infusions are usually used as supportive
therapy during bone growth. In the case of continued bone pain after
reaching maximum bone growth, then bisphosphonates can continue
to be used.
Management of low BMD includes ensuring adequate intake of
minerals such as calcium, phosphorus, zinc, magnesium, and vitamin
D. In those who are non-ambulatory, it is recommended that their serum
25-hydroxy vitamin D level is at least 30 to 40ng/mL. Weight-bearing
exercises, especially by physical therapy, are extremely important.
Aquatic therapies can also be very benecial. Pharmacologic
management using bisphosphonates are also considered for those
with increased bone fragility. Bisphosphonates serve to increase bone
mineral density by inactivating osteoclasts, which are responsible for
the breakdown of existing bone cells. Bone mineral density typically
increases during the period of treatment and then decreases back to
baseline within 2 years of discontinuation. Despite this return, a high
proportion of children remain fracture free for 5 years or more.
Conclusion
Evaluation of bone health should identify children who may
benet from interventions to decrease their elevated risk of a clinically
signicant fracture. Indications for referral include a history of
multiple fractures and non-weight bearing situations such as cerebral
palsy, chronic use of steroids, hypogonadism, and genetic conditions
like osteogenesis imperfecta. Early identication and management of
these conditions are equally important to reduce both the morbidity of
the subject as well as health-care costs.
Acknowledgments
None.
Funding
None.
Conicts of interest
The authors declare no conict of interest.
References
1. Clark EM. The epidemiology of fractures in otherwise healthy children.
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2014;12(3):272–278.
2. Weber DR, Boyce A, Gordon C, et al. The utility of DXA assessment at the
forearm, proximal femur, and lateral distal femur, and vertebral fracture
assessment in the pediatric population: 2019 ISCD ocial position. J Clin
Densitom. 2019;22(4):567–589.
3. Borges JLC, Sousa da Silva M, Ward RJ, et al. Repeating vertebral
fracture assessment: 2019 ISCD ocial position. J Clin Densitom.
2019;22(4):554–566.
4. Jesus AO, Stevenson RD. Optimizing nutrition and bone health in children
with cerebral palsy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2020;31(1):25–37.
5. PM Jehle, DR Jehle. Use of corticosteroids in nephrology-risk and
prevention of osteoporosis. Nephro Dial Transplant. 2000;15(5):565–568.
6. Buckley L, Guyatt G, Fink HA, et al. Clinical practice guidelines
glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis-American college of rheumatology
task force. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(8):1521–1537.
7. Manolagas SC. Steroids and osteoporosis: the quest for mechanisms. The
Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2013;123(5):1919–1921.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Children with cerebral palsy (CP) are at risk of growth and nutrition disorders. There are numerous challenges to measure and assess growth and nutritional status in children with CP. Addressing these challenges is imperative, because the consequences of poor growth and malnutrition range from decreased bone density, muscle mass, and quality of life to impacts on intellectual quotient, behavior, attention, social participation, healthcare utilization, and health care costs. In addition to discussing approaches to assess growth and nutrition, this article examines some of the methods of optimizing nutrition and bone health, including when preparing for and recovering from surgery.
Article
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely used in the evaluation of bone fragility in children. Previous recommendations emphasized total body less head and lumbar spine DXA scans for clinical bone health assessment. However, these scan sites may not be possible or optimal for all groups of children with conditions that threaten bone health. The utility of DXA scans of the proximal femur, forearm, and radius were evaluated for adequacy of reference data, precision, ability of predict fracture, and applicability to all, or select groups of children. In addition, the strengths and limitations of vertebral fracture assessment by DXA were evaluated. The new Pediatric Positions provide guidelines on the use of these additional measures in the assessment of skeletal health in children.
Article
Vertebral fracture (VF) is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. VFs are associated with a decline in quality of life and high morbidity and mortality. The presence of a VF is a significant risk factor for developing another fracture; however, most VFs are not clinically recognized and diagnosed. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is a low cost, low radiation, convenient, and reliable method to identify VFs. The finding of a previously unrecognized VF may change the assessment of fracture risk, diagnostic classification, and treatment strategies. VFA or radiographic lateral spine imaging should be repeated in patients with continued high risk for fracture (e.g., historical height loss > 4 cm [> 1.5 inches], self-reported but undocumented vertebral fracture, or glucocorticoid therapy equivalent to ≥ 5 mg of prednisone or equivalent per day for greater than or equal to three months).
Article
Fractures in otherwise healthy children are important because they are common, impact on daily activity, and may identify those who may have an increased fracture risk as adults. This review covers the descriptive epidemiology of fractures in healthy children (aged 0-16) and provides an overview of what is known about the child-related determinants of fractures, dividing associations into those that are potentially modifiable and those that are not. Maternal-related influences during pregnancy have not been covered, nor have determinants related to the injury such as trauma level, landing surface, injury type, the physical environment, or societal impacts. Age, gender, low bone mass, and exposure to injury are the child-related determinants of fractures with the highest quality research showing a convincing association.
Article
Advances made during the last 35 years have improved our understanding of the mechanisms of steroid hormone action on bone and how physiologic, pathologic, or iatrogenic changes in hormone levels can lead to increased fracture risk. Estrogens, androgens, and glucocorticoids alter the cellular composition of bone by regulating the supply and lifespan of osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Additionally, they influence the survival of osteocytes, long-lived cells that are entombed within the mineralized matrix and mediate the homeostatic adaptation of bone to mechanical forces. Altered redox balance is a proximal underlying mechanism of some of these effects, and sex steroid deficiency or glucocorticoid excess contributes to the aging of the skeleton.
Clinical practice guidelines glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis-American college of rheumatology task force
  • L Buckley
  • G Guyatt
  • H A Fink
  • Buckley
Buckley L, Guyatt G, Fink HA, et al. Clinical practice guidelines glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis-American college of rheumatology task force. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(8):1521-1537.