ArticlePDF Available

Systemic drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema-like eruption after Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Systemic drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is an adverse drug reaction which manifests as a symmetrical erythematous rash involving the skin folds after systemic drug exposure. A vast array of possible side effects associated with administration of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been reported in literature since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, but only few times SDRIFE-like eruptions have been described in this context. We discuss here a case of SDRIFE-like eruption following the second dose of Oxford-Astrazeneca Vaxzevria vaccine.
Content may be subject to copyright.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Open Access
© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use,
sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and
the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included
in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The
Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available
in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Bona Di et al. Clinical and Molecular Allergy (2022) 20:13
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12948-022-00179-8
the axillary fold. ere was no history of any other con-
stitutional symptom nor any mucosal involvement.
e patient started a treatment with cetirizine without
clinical benefit. She was also prescribed topical flucon-
azole due to suspicion of intertriginous fungal infection
by her general practitioner with no improvement. After
a few days, the patient consulted a dermatologist who
suggested a treatment with topical methylpredniso-
lone acetonate and emollient creams for 20 days, result-
ing in complete remission. No systemic symptoms were
reported throughout the skin rush.
e patient is affected by hypertension, asthma, rhini-
tis, and contact allergy to nickel and fragrance mix. She
didn’t take any drug in the days preceding the appearance
of the skin lesions except for her daily oral anti-hyper-
tensive medication (i.e., nebivolol/hydrochlorothiazide),
which was never stopped.
Laboratory tests, performed in September, including
inflammatory markers and complete blood count were
within the normal range. Skin tests (prick and intrader-
mal tests [ID]) with triamcinolone acetonide containing
To the editor,
A 67-year-old female patient visited our department for
an exanthem which occurred few days after receiving the
second dose of Vaxzevria (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19; Oxford-
AstraZeneca) vaccine.
After the first dose of the vaccine, administered on May
10th, 2021, the patient complained of fever and fatigue
for few days. ese symptoms showed up again after the
second dose which was administered on July 19; 5 days
after, she also reported a sharply demarcated pruritic ery-
thematous rash in the inguinal region bilaterally [Fig.1]
that subsequently involved the gluteal fold, the thighs,
the lower abdomen [Fig.2], the inframammary fold and
Clinical and Molecular Allergy
*Correspondence:
Eustachio Nettis
ambulatorio.allergologia@uniba.it
1Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, School of
Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Bari Aldo Moro,
Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
2Unit of Allergology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale
Policlinico, Bari Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11., 70124 Bari, Italy
Abstract
Systemic drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is an adverse drug reaction which manifests
as a symmetrical erythematous rash involving the skin folds after systemic drug exposure. A vast array of possible
side effects associated with administration of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been reported in literature
since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, but only few times SDRIFE-like eruptions have been described
in this context. We discuss here a case of SDRIFE-like eruption following the second dose of Oxford-Astrazeneca
Vaxzevria vaccine.
Systemic drug-related intertriginous
and exural exanthema-like eruption after
Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine
Danilo Di Bona1,2, Andrea Miniello1,2 and Eustachio Nettis2*
Page 2 of 5Bona Di et al. Clinical and Molecular Allergy (2022) 20:13
Polisorbate 80 at the concentrations of 40mg/mL, and
0.4 mg/mL, 4.0 mg/mL, 40 mg/mL, respectively, were
negative. e ID tests were read at 15min and at 96h.
e patient refused skin patch testing and lymphocyte
transformation test (LTT), which could have possibly
strengthened the suspicion of delayed drug reaction [1],
and denied her consent for histological examination.
Based on the patient’s clinical history, the lack of
systemic symptoms, of medications taken before the
development of the skin lesions, and of response to
the anti-fungal agent fluconazole suggested a pos-
sible diagnosis (by exclusion) of systemic drug-related
intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE)-like
eruption induced by the COVID-19 vaccine. We applied
the Naranjo algorithm for estimation of the probability
of adverse drug reaction (ADR), and our case scored 5
points, which is indicative of “probable ADR”. [2]
Cutaneous events associated with COVID-19 vaccina-
tion may manifest themselves in many different clinical
pictures, but they’re mostly self-limited and easily man-
ageable with topical or oral steroids [35]. SDRIFE is a
relatively uncommon cutaneous adverse drug reaction
mediated by a type IV/delayed hypersensitivity mecha-
nism with only a limited number of cases reported in
Fig. 1 Sharply demarcated erythema on the inguinal region, 12 days after Vaxzevria vaccine second dose
Page 3 of 5Bona Di et al. Clinical and Molecular Allergy (2022) 20:13
literature. It is most commonly triggered by antibiotics
(especially beta-lactams) [6], but it also been described
following the administration of iodinated radiocontrast
media and different drugs including antiasthma treat-
ments (aminophylline, terbutaline), allopurinol and
monoclonal antibodies (infliximab, golimumab) [711].
To date, since the start of the global vaccination cam-
paign, nine cases of SDRIFE-like eruption following
COVID-19 vaccines [Table1] have also been reported.
[4, 1217]. Most of these cases occurred after the second
dose, with the exception of the case reported by Manaa
et al., which occurred after the third (booster) dose of
Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine, and the ones reported by Ore-
nay et al. and Bellinato et al., who did not specify how
many injections were administered before the onset of
symptoms. e case reported here lends further support
to the possible causal relationship between COVID-19
vaccine and SDRIFE.
Fig. 2 Confluent erythematous papules merging on the lower abdominal region, 14 days after Vaxzevria second dose
Page 4 of 5Bona Di et al. Clinical and Molecular Allergy (2022) 20:13
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Author contributions
DDB conceptualization; AM and DDB draft writing; EN and DDB final editing.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the
public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All the authors gave their consent for publication.
Competing interests
None of the author have any conflict of interests to declare.
Received: 1 June 2022 / Accepted: 5 October 2022
References
1. Tan SC, Tan JWL. Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exan-
thema. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;11:313–8.
2. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, et al. A method
for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther.
1981;30:239–45.
3. Gambichler T, Boms S, Susok L, Dickel H, Finis C, Abu Rached N, et al. Cutane-
ous findings following COVID-19 vaccination: review of world literature and
own experience. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol 2021; published online Feb
1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/JDV.17744.
4. Bellinato F, Maurelli M, Gisondi P, Girolomoni G. Cutaneous Adverse Reactions
Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines. J Clin Med. 2021;10:5344.
5. Sun Q, Fathy R, McMahon DE, Freeman EE. COVID-19 Vaccines and the Skin:
The Landscape of Cutaneous Vaccine Reactions Worldwide. Dermatol Clin.
2021;39:653.
6. Nespoulous L, Matei I, Charissoux A, Bédane C, Assikar S. Symmetrical drug-
related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) associated with pris-
tinamycin, secnidazole, and nefopam, with a review of the literature. Contact
Dermat. 2018;79:378–80.
7. Huynh T, Hughey LC, McKay K, Carney C, Sami N. Systemic drug-related
intertriginous and flexural exanthema from radio contrast media: A series of 3
cases. JAAD Case Reports. 2015;1:147.
8. Winnicki M, Shear NH. A Systematic Approach to Systemic Contact Dermatitis
and Symmetric Drug-Related Intertriginous and Flexural Exanthema (SDRIFE).
Am J Clin Dermatology. 2012;2011 123:12: 171–80.
9. Elmariah SB, Cheung W, Wang N, Kamino H, Pomeranz MK. Systemic drug-
related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE). Dermatol Online J
2009; 15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5070/D32WS5H2S0.
10. Bulur I, Keseroglu HO, Saracoglu ZN, Gonul M. Symmetrical drug-related
intertriginous and flexural exanthema (Baboon syndrome) associated with
infliximab. J Dermatol Case Rep. 2015;9:12.
11. Yang SY, Lan CC, Hu SCS. Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural
exanthema (SDRIFE) induced by golimumab. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56:571–2.
12. Orenay OM, Balta I, Yigit D, Eksioglu M. Systemic drug-related intertriginous
and flexural exanthema like eruption after CoronaVac vaccine. J Eur Acad
Dermatology Venereol. 2021;35:e634.
13. Lim PN, Wylie G. Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural
exanthema like eruption associated with COVID19 vaccination. Clin Exp
Dermatol. 2022;47:175–6.
14. Hai J, Shawa H, Kim-Lim P, Wang JZ, Vy M, Fung MA, et al. Systemic drug-
related intertriginous and flexural exanthema induced by the Pfizer-BioNTech
COVID-19 vaccine: A report of 2 cases. JAAD Case Reports. 2021;18:57.
15. Hong JK, Shin SH, Yoo KH, Li K, Seo SJ. Symmetric drug-related intertriginous
and flexural exanthema-like eruption related to coronavirus disease 2019
vaccine. Contact Dermat. 2022. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/COD.14092.
16. Lahouel I, Ben Salah N, Ben Fadhel N, Chahed F, Ouni N, Belhadjali H, et al.
Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema-like eruption
after COVID-19 vaccine. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; published online
April. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/JDV.18108.
17. Manaa A, Ziv M, Krausz J, Dodiuk-Gad RP. A case of symmetrical drug-
related intertriginous and flexural exanthema-like eruption associated with
Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination. Dermatol Ther 2022; published online May 12.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/DTH.15546.
Table 1 Reported cases of SDRIFE-like eruption secondary following COVID-19 vaccination
Reported case Vaccine type Age / sex
of patient
Onset after
injection
N° of vac-
cine doses
prior to
SDRIFE
Treatment
Orenay et al. (2021)12 CoronaVac 87 M 4 days N/A Oral prednisolone 40 mg/day (3 weeks including ta-
pering off ); topical corticosteroids; oral antihistamines
Lim & Wylie (2021)13 Vaxzevria (ChAdOx1
nCoV-19)
61 M 1 day 2 Oral prednisolone 30 mg/day (4 weeks including
tapering off ); topical corticosteroids and antifungals
Hai et al. (2021)14 Comirnaty (BNT162b2) 23 M 6 weeks 2 Topical corticosteroid
38 F 2 weeks 2 Oral prednisolone 40 mg/day (9 days including taper-
ing off); topical corticosteroid
Bellinato et al.
(2021)4Comirnaty (BNT162b2) 65 M 2 weeks N/A N/A
Hong et al. (2022)15 Vaxzevria (ChAdOx1
nCoV-19)
53 M 7 days 2 Oral prednisolone 30 mg/day (2 weeks including
tapering off )
Lahouel et al.
(2022)16 Comirnaty (BNT162b2) 52 F 5 days 2 None (spontaneous remission after 5 days)
CoronaVac 57 F 3 days 2 Topical corticosteroids; oral antihistamine
Manaa et al. (2022)17 Comirnaty (BNT162b2) 59 M 2 days 3 Oral prednisone 40 mg/day (1 month including taper-
ing off); cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg/day (2.5 months
including tapering off ); topical corticosteroids
Our case Vaxzevria (ChAdOx1
nCoV-19)
67 F 5 days 2 Topical corticosteroids (20 days)
Page 5 of 5Bona Di et al. Clinical and Molecular Allergy (2022) 20:13
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
... Although intertriginous erythema type does not always show symmetrical distribution, this type may correspond to symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) [42,150] . Similar large erythema may be also observed in areas other than intertriginous areas, which may correspond to contact dermatitis type [34] . ...
Article
Full-text available
Cutaneous adverse reactions (CARs) after COVD-19 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines have been reported worldwide, but the pathophysiology of CARs remains to be elucidated. To understand the pathophysiology, it is essential to know how the innate and adaptive immunity are activated after vaccination. At present, majority of CARs are presumed to be evoked by innate immunity response. Reviewing the previous articles, I propose the clinical classification of CARs; local injection site reaction, generalized eruption, localized eruption and others. Since COVID-19 mutates continuously to overcome the existing vaccines, our steady efforts are indispensable to clarify the pathophysiology of CARs and contribute to the development of novel vaccines with least adverse events and high efficacy.
Chapter
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccines prevent severe disease, hospitalisation and death. However, as vaccination drives commenced, there have been multiple reports of cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination and resultant vaccine hesitancy. This chapter provides evidence-based guidance on the evaluation of patients with cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination. An accurate evaluation will enable physicians to risk stratify patients based on their reaction pattern and guide patients to complete recommended COVID-19 vaccinations, where possible. Evaluation of a patient with a possible COVID-19 vaccine cutaneous reaction involves determining causality to the COVID-19 vaccination. Other possible aetiologies such as new medications and unrelated exacerbations of pre-existing dermatoses should be excluded. For cutaneous reactions that are potentially life-threatening such as anaphylaxis, severe cutaneous adverse reactions and systemic vasculitis, it would be prudent to avoid further doses of the same type of COVID-19 vaccine. Patients with urticaria/angio-oedema without features of anaphylaxis, delayed large location reactions, pemphigoid/pemphigus, vaccine-related eruption of papules and plaques, varicella-zoster virus (VZV) reactivation, flares of eczema and psoriasis may continue to receive further doses of the same COVID-19 vaccine.
Article
Full-text available
Many patients are receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, which have been associated with a variety of adverse effects. Cutaneous adverse reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations have been progressively reported, but they have not been reviewed according to their morphological clinical patterns. The objective of this review was to summarize the existing data concerning the cutaneous adverse reactions following SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and group them according to common morphological and pathogenetic patterns. We reviewed the English language literature up to August 15th, 2021, using predefined keywords to identify the relevant studies evaluating cutaneous adverse reactions associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. We search for recurrent morphological patterns sharing clinical signs and symptoms and physio-pathological mechanisms. Timing to onset following the first or booster dose of the vaccine, predisposing conditions, therapeutic management, and outcome were also collected. Among the dermatological manifestations associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, we distinguished: (1) new onset reactions and (2) flares of preexisting dermatoses. The most common were injection site reactions, affecting 30–70% and generally mild or moderate. Small case series or single case reports included filler reactions, exanthemas, vascular lesions, urticaria, eczematous dermatitis, autoimmune bullous reactions, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions. In addition, the exacerbation of chronic immuno-mediated dermatoses (mainly psoriasis and atopic dermatitis) and reactivations of herpes infection were reported. The cutaneous reactions were generally mild, self-limiting, and resembled common cutaneous drug eruptions and/or COVID-19 skin manifestations.
Article
Full-text available
There is growing evidence that not only the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) but also the COVID-19 vaccines can cause a variety of skin reactions. In this review article, we provide a brief overview on cutaneous findings that have been observed since the emerging mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns all over the world. Unspecific injection site reactions very early occurring after the vaccination are most frequent. Type I hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis) likely due to allergy to ingredients may rarely occur but can be severe. Type IV hypersensitivity reactions may be observed, including delayed large local skin lesions (“COVID arm”), inflammatory reactions in dermal filler or previous radiation sites or even old BCG scars, and more commonly moribilliform and erythema multiforme-like rashes. Autoimmune-mediated skin findings after COVID-19 vaccination include leukocytoclastic vasculitis, lupus erythematosus, and immune thrombocytopenia. Functional angiopathies (chilblain-like lesions, erythromelalgia) may also be observed. Pityriasis rosea-like rashes and reactivation of herpes zoster have also been reported after COVID-19 vaccination. In conclusion, there are numerous cutaneous reaction patterns that may occur following COVID-19 vaccination, whereby many of these skin findings are of immunological/autoimmunological nature. Importantly, molecular mimicry exists between SARS-CoV-2 (e.g., the spike-protein sequences used to design the vaccines) and human components and may thus explain some COVID-19 pathologies as well adverse skin reactions to COVID-19 vaccinations.
Article
A 61 year old patient presented with a 4 week history of tender rash on bilateral groins. There was no associated rash elsewhere. The rash appeared a day after he had received the second ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19 (AstraZeneca‐Oxford) vaccine. His past medical history included type 2 diabetes which had been well‐controlled with oral anti‐diabetic medications. Examination revealed a florid, symmetrical rash with a well‐demarcated inflammatory border on both groins (Fig. 1).
Article
Systemic contact dermatitis is a condition seen in individuals when sensitized to an allergen through skin then exposure to the sensitized substance or cross‐reacting to it (1). In 1984, ‘Baboon syndrome’ described as a systemic contact dermatitis characterized with involvement of flexural region and buttocks area which named after the red bottomed baboons (2). Hausermann et al. reported drug‐related Baboon syndrome without a previous sensitization which named as symmetrical drug‐related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) (3). We are presenting a case of SDRIFE‐like eruption after covid‐19 vaccination.
Article
In 2021, we entered a new phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. As mass vaccinations are underway and more vaccines are approved, it is important to recognize cutaneous adverse events. We review the dermatologic manifestations of COVID-19 vaccines as reported in clinical trial data and summarize additional observational reports of skin reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. Early-onset local injection reactions were the most common cutaneous side effects observed in clinical trials; delayed injection reactions were the most common cutaneous side effect reported outside of clinical trials. Understanding the landscape of cutaneous manifestations to COVID-19 vaccines is key to providing appropriate vaccine guidance.