ArticlePDF Available

Case Report: A case of cervical spinal epidural abscess combined with cervical paravertebral soft tissue abscess

Frontiers
Frontiers in Surgery
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare purulent infection of the central nervous system. Abscesses confined to the spinal canal can compress the spinal cord, causing nerve damage and even death in severe cases (1). Prompt diagnosis and treatment can relieve symptoms and prevent complications. To increase awareness of this rare disease, we report a case of a 58-year-old man with a cervical spinal epidural abscess combined with a soft tissue abscess in the neck and describe its clinical course, imaging feature, pathology, treatment, and patient prognosis.Case descriptionA 58-year-old male Chinese patient was admitted to our hospital because of neck pain for 2 months, which worsened for 4 days. On the third day of admission, the muscle strength of the limbs decreased, and MRI of the spinal cord showed abnormal signal shadows in the spinal canal at the C1-C7 level and in the surrounding soft tissue on the right side of spine, suggesting the possibility of inflammatory lesions with local abscess formation. We immediately performed decompression of the spinal canal on the patient and performed incision and drainage of the cervical abscess. During the operation, we found a large amount of pus in the epidural space of the spinal canal, and there was a fistula between the cervical abscess and the epidural abscess of the spinal canal. The patient underwent continuous drainage and anti-infective treatment with sensitive antibiotics after operation. No recurrence of the abscess was observed and the patient recovered well.Conclusion Early diagnosis is the key to the treatment of SEA, so radiologists and neurosurgeons need to strengthen their understanding of this rare disease to avoid misdiagnosis. For SEA with definite diagnosis, decompression surgery should be performed in a timely manner when symptoms of nerve compression occur, continuous drainage should be performed after surgery, and sensitive antibiotics should be used for anti-infective treatment.
This content is subject to copyright.
EDITED BY
J. M. Zuidam,
Erasmus Medical Center, Netherlands
REVIEWED BY
Nguyen Minh Duc,
Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine,
Vietnam
Bipin Chaurasia,
Neurosurgery Clinic, Nepal
Paolo Palmisciano,
University of Cincinnati, United States
*CORRESPONDENCE
Xuefei Shao
drshao@163.com
Jun Cao
caojun13651611423@126.com
Jincheng Fang
jinchengfang@foxmail.com
These authors have contributed equally to this
work and share rst authorship
SPECIALTY SECTION
This article was submitted to Neurosurgery, a
section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery
RECEIVED 13 June 2022
ACCEPTED 23 August 2022
PUBLISHED 05 October 2022
CITATION
Cao J, Fang J, Shao X, Shen J and Jiang X
(2022) Case Report: A case of cervical spinal
epidural abscess combined with cervical
paravertebral soft tissue abscess.
Front. Surg. 9:967806.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.967806
COPYRIGHT
© 2022 Cao, Fang, shao, Shen and Jiang. This is
an open-access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License (CC BY). The use, distribution or
reproduction in other forums is permitted,
provided the original author(s) and the
copyright owner(s) are credited and that the
original publication in this journal is cited, in
accordance with accepted academic practice.
No use, distribution or reproduction is
permitted which does not comply with these
terms.
Case Report: A case of cervical
spinal epidural abscess
combined with cervical
paravertebral soft tissue abscess
Jun Cao*, Jincheng Fang*, Xuefei Shao*, Jun Shen
and Xiaochun Jiang
Department of Neurosurgery, The First Afliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan
Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, China
Background: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare purulent infection of the
central nervous system. Abscesses conned to the spinal canal can
compress the spinal cord, causing nerve damage and even death in severe
cases (1). Prompt diagnosis and treatment can relieve symptoms and prevent
complications. To increase awareness of this rare disease, we report a case
of a 58-year-old man with a cervical spinal epidural abscess combined with
a soft tissue abscess in the neck and describe its clinical course, imaging
feature, pathology, treatment, and patient prognosis.
Case description: A 58-year-old male Chinese patient was admitted to our
hospital because of neck pain for 2 months, which worsened for 4 days. On
the third day of admission, the muscle strength of the limbs decreased, and
MRI of the spinal cord showed abnormal signal shadows in the spinal canal
at the C1-C7 level and in the surrounding soft tissue on the right side of
spine, suggesting the possibility of inammatory lesions with local abscess
formation. We immediately performed decompression of the spinal canal on
the patient and performed incision and drainage of the cervical abscess.
During the operation, we found a large amount of pus in the epidural space
of the spinal canal, and there was a stula between the cervical abscess and
the epidural abscess of the spinal canal. The patient underwent continuous
drainage and anti-infective treatment with sensitive antibiotics after
operation. No recurrence of the abscess was observed and the patient
recovered well.
Conclusion: Early diagnosis is the key to the treatment of SEA, so
radiologists and neurosurgeons need to strengthen their understanding of
this rare disease to avoid misdiagnosis. For SEA with denite diagnosis,
decompression surgery should be performed in a timely manner when
symptoms of nerve compression occur, continuous drainage should
be performed after surgery, and sensitive antibiotics should be used for
anti-infective treatment.
KEYWORDS
spinal epidural abscess, decompression, surgery, treatment, case report
TYPE Case Report
PUBLISHED 05 October 2022
|
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.967806
Frontiers in Surgery 01 frontiersin.org
Introduction
Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare purulent infection of
the epidural space (1). Due to the accumulation of a large
amount of pus and the proliferation of granulation tissue, the
spinal cord is compressed and has a high disability rate. After
the onset of the disease, the patients condition develops
rapidly, and a large amount of pus can accumulate in the
epidural space in a short period of time, which can cause the
spinal cord to be compressed, resulting in neurological
dysfunction and even paraplegia (1,2). Currently, the main
treatment options for spinal epidural abscesses are sensitive
antibiotic therapy or open surgery with laminectomy for
decompression, removal of pus, and continuous drainage (3).
Spinal epidural abscesses are more common in the
thoracolumbar spinal cord and less common in the cervical
spinal cord. Recently, a patient with cervical spinal epidural
abscess combined with cervical soft tissue abscess was treated
in our hospital, and the treatment effect was satisfactory. The
report is as follows.
Case description
The patient, a 58-year-old Chinese male, was admitted to
the hospital with a 2-month history of neck pain that
worsened for 4 days. In the past two months, the patient
often developed neck pain without obvious cause,
accompanied by radiating pain in both upper limbs and
shoulders. He had been treated in a local hospital and was
considered as having cervical spondylosis. 14 days before
admission, he received neck acupuncture treatment at the
local hospital, but the neck pain did not improve signicantly.
4 days before admission, she developed redness, swelling and
pain in her neck, and fever appeared. The highest temperature
reached 38.6°C in the afternoon. After admission, a neck B-
ultrasound showed an abnormal echo mass in the deep soft
tissue of the right posterior neck. On the third day of
admission, the muscle strength of the limbs decreased, and
the decrease of the muscle strength of the lower limbs was
particularly obvious. Physical examination showed extensive
percussion pain in the spinous process of the neck with
radiating pain in both upper limbs. The left biceps muscle
strength was grade 3, the right biceps muscle strength was
grade 2, the quadriceps muscle strength of both lower limbs
was grade 2, the left foot dorsiexor muscle strength was
grade 2, the right foot dorsiexor muscle strength was grade
0, and the anal sphincter muscle strength was grade 0. MRI of
the cervical and thoracic vertebrae was immediately
performed, showing abnormal signal shadow of dorsal spinal
cord in the spinal canal at C1C7 level, inammatory lesions
with the possibility of local abscess formation, posterior
herniation of the C5/6 disc, and compression of the
surrounding dura and spinal cord (Figure 1). The patient had
a history of hypertension for 7 years, with normal blood
pressure control, and denied the history of diabetes and other
diseases.
Considering that the patient had developed neurological
symptoms and was at risk of respiratory failure at any time
due to cervical spinal cord compression, the patient was
immediately treated with cervical spinal epidural abscess
removal + spinal canal decompression + neck abscess incision
and drainageunder general anesthesia. The C4 spinous
process was used as the center to mark a straight incision
with a length of 8 cm in the posterior midline of the neck.
The incision was made layer by layer, and the bilateral
paraspinal muscles were dissected to the lateral edge of the
lamina under the periosteum. During the operation, an
abscess stula was seen in the right paravertebral muscle,
connecting the soft tissue abscess of the neck to the spinal
canal. A large amount of dark yellow epidural pus spilled
when the C3C5 lamina was opened (Figure 2). The pus was
collected for bacterial culture and drug sensitivity test. Part of
ligamentum avum was resected and sent for pathological
examination. During the operation to remove the pus in the
spinal canal, it is necessary to decompress the spinal canal
thoroughly, but also to protect the dura mater to prevent pus
from breaking into the subarachnoid space and causing
subarachnoid space infection. After complete decompression,
the spinal canal was rinsed with iodophor solution, hydrogen
peroxide and a large amount of normal saline, and the spinal
cord was found to be pulsating well without obvious spinal
cord compression. One negative pressure drainage tube was
indwelled and the incision was closed successively. Further
incision and drainage were performed for the abscess in the
deep neck. A vertical incision of 4.5 cm was made about 3 cm
beside the midline of the posterior neck. The skin and
subcutaneous tissue were cut layer by layer, and the abscess
cavity was observed in the depth of the neck. The pus in the
cavity was sucked out, and a negative pressure drainage tube
was placed and sutured successively to close the incision.
After surgery, the patient was transferred to neurosurgical
intensive care unit for observation, assisted breathing by
ventilator, anti-inammatory treatment was performed by
intravenous infusion of vancomycin, symptomatic treatment
was performed by nutritive nerve drugs, and continuous
drainage was performed by negative pressure drainage tube.
On day 2 after surgery, the muscle strength of the patients
left biceps muscle was grade 4, the muscle strength of the
right biceps muscle was grade 3, the muscle strength of the
quadriceps femoris muscle of both lower limbs was grade 4,
and the muscle strength of the anal sphincter muscle was
grade 4. The patient was able to control urination and remove
the catheter 5 days after surgery. Bacterial culture and drug
sensitivity test showed Staphylococcus aureus (susceptible to
Cao et al. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.967806
Frontiers in Surgery 02 frontiersin.org
FIGURE 1
(A) MRI T1-weighted image shows a long strip of isointense lesions on the dorsal side of the spinal cord in the C1C7 spinal canal. Also see C5/6
intervertebral disc herniation, and the corresponding dura and spinal cord are compressed. (B) T2-weighted image shows hyperintensity of the
lesion. (C) T1-enhanced image showed annular enhancement of the lesion, no obvious internal enhancement, and spinal cord compression at
the corresponding level. (D) Axial T1-enhanced image showed a large range of irregular non-enhanced areas in the soft tissue of the right
posterior side of the cervical spine, and a ring-enhancing lesion in the right posterior part of the spinal cord in the spinal canal, with no obvious
internal enhancement. (E) Coronal T1-enhanced image shows a slightly hypointense lesion on the right side of the spinal cord in the cervical
spinal canal and (F) a honeycomb-like non-enhancing area in the soft tissue on the right side of the spinal canal.
FIGURE 2
(A) during the operation, a stula was seen in the right posterior side of the spinal canal, connecting the paravertebral abscess and the spinal epidural
abscess.The arrow points to the location of the stula. (B) After opening the lamina, a large amount of pus was seen in the spinal canal, and the pus
was mainly located in the back of the spinal cord and the right side of the spinal cord. The arrow points to the pus on the side of the spinal cord.
(C) The surgical incision and drainage tube for the spinal abscess are shown on the left, and the surgical incision and drainage tube for the
paravertebral soft tissue abscess in the neck are shown on the left.
Cao et al. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.967806
Frontiers in Surgery 03 frontiersin.org
vancomycin, levooxacin and ceftriaxone), and pathological
results showed inammatory reactions (Figure 3). Drainage
tube was removed 10 days after surgery and vancomycin was
replaced with ceftriaxone (continued for 5 weeks). Twenty
days after surgery, the patient got out of bed with a neck
brace and moved autonomously. MRI of the cervical spine 21
days after the operation showed that the abscess signal in the
spinal canal disappeared completely (Figure 3). After 6
months of follow-up, the patient had grade 5 muscle strength,
no sensory disturbance, and no recurrence of abscess.
Discussion
The infection of spinal epidural abscess is mainly through the
following three ways (3): (1) Blood and lymphatic system
infection; (2) Direct spread of local infection; (3) Invasive
surgical procedures such as the placement of epidural catheter,
result in bacterial invasion of the spinal canal. Among them,
the placement of epidural catheter is an important risk factor
for SEA. Some studies (4,5) reported that the incidence of
epidural abscess after the placement of epidural catheter is
0.5%3.0%. Other possible risk factors include diabetes, human
immunodeciency virus (HIV) infection, trauma, tattooing,
acupuncture, and infection of adjacent bone or soft tissue. In
this case, combined with the intraoperative ndings, the
infection route was considered to be the spread of the cervical
paravertebral soft tissue abscess into the spinal canal. This
patient denied the history of diabetes mellitus and other
diseases, but had received neck acupuncture treatment before
the onset of the disease. It cannot be ruled out that acupuncture
treatment was the cause of the disease.
The common pathogenic bacteria of SEA are Staphylococcus
aureus, while Escherichia coli and Streptococcus pneumoniae are
rare (68). The mechanism of spinal cord injury caused by
abscess diffusion in epidural space is as follows (3): (1) Direct
compression of spinal cord; (2) Thrombosis and
thrombophlebitis of adjacent veins; (3) Interruption of arterial
blood supply; (4) Bacterial toxins and inammatory mediators.
When the infection occurs in the epidural space, the abscess
can spread longitudinally to 35 spinal segments, and in severe
cases it can spread to the entire spine (9). However, even small
SEA can cause severe neurological symptoms and sequelae, and
neurological impairment is the most serious complication of
spinal epidural abscess (10).
SEA is more common in the thoracolumbar spine, an area
where the epidural space is larger and contains more fatty
tissue that is susceptible to infection (10). Most of the SEA is
located in the posterior part of the spinal canal, and if it
occurs in the anterior part, it is usually located below L1.
The epidural space is a vertical sheath-like structure, and
an abscess that begins at one segment often expands to
multiple segments (3). Our case is unique in that the SEA
occurred at almost the entire cervical vertebra segment,
forming neurological symptoms with obvious spinal cord
compression.
The initial manifestations of SEA are usually non-specic,
and the classical triad with diagnostic signicance is fever,
spinal pain and neurological dysfunction (11). However, only
a few patients have all three manifestations at the time of
diagnosis. When the patient has severe localized neck and
back pain and fever, the diagnosis can be considered as SEA
or spinal osteomyelitis. However, when a patient seeks a
doctor only for neck pain, SEA is rarely considered, and it is
easy to miss the diagnosis. When SEA is combined with
paravertebral abscess, it can also manifest as inammatory
manifestations of redness, swelling, heat, and pain in the
paravertebral soft tissue.
FIGURE 3
(A) microscopic examination of the sample tissue with HE staining revealed brous adipose tissue, in which a large number of acute and chronic
inammatory cell inltrates with abscess formation, and vascular dilatation and hyperemia were observed. Picture was taken at 100 magnication.
(B) T1-weighted image of the cervical spine 21 days after the operation showed that the abscess signal in the spinal canal disappeared. (C) T2-
weighted image of the cervical spine 21 days after the operation.
Cao et al. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.967806
Frontiers in Surgery 04 frontiersin.org
Once SEA is suspected, imaging should be performed as
soon as possible. MRI examination can show the location
and extent of intraspinal lesions, and can even show
stulas between abscesses, which is the preferred examination
method (12). In the acute phase, SEA manifests as low signal
intensity or iso-intensity on T1WI and high signal intensity
on T2WI. As the disease progresses, it will show iso-intensity
on T1WI and T2WI, and the abscess wall will be signicantly
enhanced on enhanced scan, but there is no enhancement in
the abscess cavity. MRI can help differentiate SEA from
intraspinal hematoma and spinal epidural tumor. Intraspinal
hematoma is mainly iso-intensity and highintensity on
T1WI, and slightly high-intensity or high-intensity on T2WI,
mixed with a little low-intensity. Enhanced scan shows the
enhancement of the hematoma wall. Epidural tumors show
isointensity on T1WI, slightly hyperintensity or isointensity
on T2WI, and obvious homogeneous enhancement on
enhanced scan (13). Contrast-enhanced CT scans can be used
if MRI cannot be performed immediately or if there are
contraindications (14). X-ray examination has little diagnostic
value for SEA, and myelography has been basically eliminated.
In recent years, there have been many debates on how to
treat spinal epidural abscesses. Some scholars advocate the use
of sensitive antibiotics alone, while others believe that open
surgery assisted by sensitive antibiotics is more reliable.
Suppiah et al. (15) believed that open surgery assisted with
sensitive antibiotic therapy is the best treatment method. If
the neurological function is intact, conservative antibiotic
treatment can be given rst, but close neurological function
monitoring is required. Patients with suspected spinal epidural
abscess should be closely monitored for neurological function.
Tuchman et al. (16) believed that patients should be clear
about delayed neurological damage that may occur at any
time when they are treated with antibiotics alone for SEA
patients without neurological symptoms, but because the
irreversible time point of spinal nerve damage is still unclear,
the rst recommended treatment is surgical treatment.
Shweikeh et al. (17) regard the occurrence of nerve damage as
the key factor for surgical treatment, and the timing of
surgical treatment should be within 3672 h after the
occurrence of nerve dysfunction. The timing of surgery
should also be determined by the patients age, complications
(diabetes, cardiovascular disease, renal insufciency) and other
specic conditions (18).
In this case, MRI examination was performed immediately
after the onset of neurological symptoms and decompression
of the spinal canal was performed in time, which is the key to
the good prognosis of the patient. After surgery, vancomycin
was used empirically for anti-inammatory treatment. The
postoperative drug sensitivity test showed that the bacteria
were sensitive to vancomycin, levooxacin and ceftriaxone.
After the drainage tube was removed, vancomycin was
replaced with ceftriaxone to continue treatment for 5 weeks.
Follow-up MRI re-examination showed that the epidural
abscess disappeared and the compression was relieved. In this
case, only spinal canal decompression was performed, and
internal xators were not used. The main considerations were
as follows: (1) The pathogenic bacteria were not clear, and the
use of internal xators might increase the risk of infection; (2)
No stability structures such as articular processes were
destroyed during operation, and postoperative spinal stability
was not affected.
Conclusion
Early diagnosis is the key to the treatment of SEA. Patients
without neurological symptoms can be treated with effective
antibiotics in early, sufcient and timely manner. If
neurological symptoms worsen, MRI examination should be
performed in time. For SEA with denite diagnosis,
decompression surgery should be performed in time when
symptoms of nerve compression occur, and continuous
drainage and anti-infection treatment with sensitive antibiotics
should be selected after surgery.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are
included in the article/Supplementary Material, further
inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed
and approved by The studies involving human participants
were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the
First Afliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan
Hospital of Wannan Medical College). The patients/
participants provided their written informed consent to
participate in this study. Written informed consent was
obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any
potentially identiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
JC analyzed the data and wrote the rst draft. XS, JS and
JC performed the surgery. JF and XS revised the article
critically for important intellectual content. Professor XJ is
directly responsible for the manuscript. All authors
substantially contributed to the conception and design of this
article and gave nal approval for the version for publication
and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All
Cao et al. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.967806
Frontiers in Surgery 05 frontiersin.org
authors contributed to the article and approved the
submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the PeakTraining Program
for Scientic Research of Yijishan Hospital (grant number
PF2019003), and Domestic Visiting Scholar Program for
Excellent Young Talents in Colleges and Universities of Anhui
Province (grant number gxgnfx2021125).
Acknowledgments
We thank the patient and his family for participating in this
study.
Conict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted
in the absence of any commercial or nancial
relationships that could be construed as a potential conict
of interest.
Publishers note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the
authors and do not necessarily represent those of their
afliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors
and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this
article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not
guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Zimmerer SM, Conen A, Müller AA, Sailer M, Taub E, Flückiger U, et al.
Spinal epiduralabscess: aetiology, predisponent factors and clinical outcomes in
a 4-year prospective study. Eur Spine J. (2011) 20(12):222834. doi: 10.1007/
s00586-011-1838-y
2. Epstein NE. Timing and prognosis of surgery for spinal epidural abscess: a
review. Surg Neurol Int. (2015) 6(Suppl 19):S475486. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.
166887
3. Babic M, Simpfendorfer CS, Berbari EF. Update on spinal epidural abscess.
Curr Opin Infect Dis. (2019) 32:26571. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000544
4. Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JA, Royal College of Anaesthetists Third
National Audit Project. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report
on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br
J Anaesth. (2009) 102(2):17990. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen360
5. Sethna NF, Clendenin D, Athiraman U, Solodiuk J, Rodriguez DP,
Zurakowski D. Incidence of epidural catheter-associated infections after
continuous epidural analgesia in children. Anesthesiology. (2010) 113(1):22432.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181de6cc5
6. Sadato N, Numaguchi Y, Rigamonti D, Kodama T, Nussbaum E, Sato S, et al.
Spinal epidural abscess with gadolinium-enhanced MRI: serial follow-up studies
and clinical correlations. Neuroradiology. (1994) 36(1):448. doi: 10.1007/BF00599195
7. Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT, Muffoletto AJ. Hematogenous
pyogenic spinal infections and their surgical management. Spine. (2000) 25
(13):166879. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200007010-00010
8. Felton B, Dao T, Gerstner B, Letarte S. Diagnosis of spinal epidural abscess by
abdominal plain - lm radiography. West J Emerg Med. (2014) 15(7):8856.
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.8.22545
9. Darouiche RO, Hamill RJ, Greenberg SB, Weathers SW, Musher DM. Bacterial
spinal epidural abscess. Review of 43 cases and literature survey. Medicine
(Baltimore). (1992) 71(6):36985. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199211000-00004
10. Vakili M, Crum-Cianone NF. Spinal epidural abscess: a series of
101 cases. Am J Med. (2017) 130(12):145863. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.07.017
11. Davis DP, Wold RM, Patel RJ, Tran AJ, Tokhi RN, Chan TC, et al. The
clinical presentation and impact of diagnostic delays on emergency department
patients with spinal epidural abscess. J Emerg Med. (2004) 26(3):28591.
doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.11.013
12. Tompkins M, Panuncialman I, Lucas P, Palumbo M. Spinal epidural abscess.
J Emerg Med. (2010) 39(3):38490. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.11.001
13. Uchida K, Nakajima H, Yayama T, Sato R, Kobayashi S, Chen KB,
et al. Epidural abscess associated with pyogenic spondylodiscitis of the
lumbar spine; evaluation of a new MRI staging classication and imaging
ndings as indicators of surgical management: a retrospective study of 37
patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. (2010) 130(1):1118. doi: 10.1007/s00402-
009-0928-3
14. Johnson KG. Spinal epidural abscess. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. (2013)
25(3):38997. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2013.04.002
15. Suppiah S, Meng Y, Fehlings MG, Massicotte EM, Yee A, Shamji MF. How
best to manage the spinal epidural abscess? A current systematic review. World
Neurosurg. (2016) 93:208. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.074
16. Tuchman A, Pham M, Hsieh PC. The indications and timing for operative
management of spinal epidural abscess: literature review and treatment algorithm.
Neurosurg Focus. (2014) 37(2):E8. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.FOCUS14261
17. Shweikeh F, Saeed K, Bukavina L, Zyck S, Drazin D, Steinmetz MP. An
institutional series and contemporary review of bacterial spinal epidural abscess:
current status and future directions. Neurosurg Focus. (2014) 37(2):E9. doi: 10.
3171/2014.6.FOCUS14146
18. Ran B, Chen X, Zhong Q, Fu M, Wei J. CT-guided minimally invasive
treatment for an extensive spinal epidural abscess: a case report and literature
review. Eur Spine J. (2018) 27(Suppl 3):3805. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5307-0
Cao et al. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.967806
Frontiers in Surgery 06 frontiersin.org
Article
We present a case of a 94-year-old female who presented to the emergency room with a fever and generalized weakness without an initial obvious source of infection. Throughout admission, she continued to be febrile despite broad-spectrum antibiotics. Several days into admission, the patient complained of severe back pain, necessitating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the entire spine. The imaging revealed an extensive epidural fluid collection consistent with a spinal epidural abscess. Fortunately, she did not have any neurological deficits and was treated conservatively with IV antibiotics with improvement. This case highlights this rare presentation and the importance of early diagnosis and management of spinal epidural abscesses.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract: Background: Spinal epidural abscess is a rare but serious condition that can cause spinal cord compression and neurological deficits. Case Description and Methods: The article reports a case of a 31-year-old patient who presented with an infectious cellulitis in the left hand, which progressed to a spinal epidural abscess. The diagnosis was confirmed by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment involved laminectomy, after which the patient had complete recovery of neurological deficits. This article is a case report with a literature review. Patient data and images were collected by the researchers who participated in the patient’s care. The literature was reviewed by one of the researchers based on the search for articles in the PubMed database. For the research, the following keywords were inserted: “Spinal epidural empyema”, “Spinal epidural abscess”. Conclusion: Spinal epidural abscess is often underdiagnosed, which can lead to delays in treatment and serious complications. The relationship between cellulitis and spinal epidural abscess may be related to the spread of infection through the lymphatic or blood system
Article
Full-text available
Although recent diagnostic and management methods have improved the prognosis of cervical epidural abscesses, morbidity and mortality remain significant. The purpose of our study is to define the clinical presentation of cervical spinal epidural abscess, to determine the early clinical outcome of surgical treatment, and to identify the most effective diagnostic and treatment approaches. Additionally, we analyzed studies regarding cervical epidural abscesses and performed a review of the literature. In this study, four patients with spinal epidural abscess were included. There were three men and one woman with a mean age of 53 years. Three patients presented with motor deficits, and one patient was diagnosed incidentally through spinal imaging. All the patients had fever, and blood cultures were positive. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism cultured from abscesses. All patients underwent a surgical procedure, and three patients recovered their normal neurological functions, but one remained with mild neurological disability that was resolved two years postoperatively. The mean follow-up period was 12 months, and no deaths occurred in this series. Furthermore, we identified 85 studies in the literature review and extracted data regarding the diagnosis and management of these patients. The timely detection and effective management of this condition are essential for minimizing its associated morbidity and mortality.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The nonsurgical versus surgical management of spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs) remains controversial. Even with the best preoperative screening for multiple risk factors, high nonoperative failure rates are attended by considerable morbidity (e.g., irreversible paralysis) and mortality. Therefore, the focus remains on early surgery. Methods: Most papers promote early recognition of the clinical triad (e.g., fever [50%], spinal pain [92-100%], and neurological deficits [47%]) for SEA. They also identify SEA-related risk factors for choosing nonsurgical versus surgical approaches; advanced age (>65 or 80), diabetes (15-30%), cancer, intravenous drug abuse (25%), smoking (23%), elevated white blood cell count (>12.5), high C-reactive protein >115, positive blood cultures, magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomographic documented cord compression, and significant neurological deficits (e.g., 19-45%). Results: Surgical options include: decompressions, open versus minimally invasive biopsy/culture/irrigation, or fusions. Up to 75% of SEA involve the thoracolumbar spine, and 50% are located ventrally. Wound cultures are positive in up to 78.8% of cases and are often (60%) correlated with positive blood cultures. The most typical offending organism is methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, followed by methicillin sensitive S. aureus. Unfortunately, the failure rates for nonoperative treatment of SEA remain high (e.g., 41-42.5%), contributing to significant morbidity (22% risk of permanent paralysis), and mortality (3-25%). Conclusion: The vast majority of studies advocated early surgery to achieve better outcomes for treating SEA; this avoids high failure rates (41-42.5%) for nonoperative therapy, and limits morbidity/mortality rates.
Article
Purpose of review: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is still a rare but potentially very morbid infection of the spine. In recent years, the incidence has risen sharply but the condition remains a medical conundrum wrought with unacceptably long diagnostic delays. The outcome depends on timely diagnosis and missed opportunities can be associated with catastrophic consequences. Management and outcomes have improved over the past decade. This review focuses on risk factors and markers that can aid in establishing the diagnosis, the radiological characteristics of SEA on MRI and their clinical implications, as well as the importance of establishing clear indications for surgical decompression. Recent findings: This once exclusively surgically managed entity is increasingly treated conservatively with antimicrobial therapy. Patients diagnosed in a timely fashion, prior to cord involvement and the onset of neurologic deficits can safely be managed without decompressive surgery with targeted antimicrobial therapy. Patients with acute cord compression and gross neurologic deficits promptly undergo decompression. The greatest therapeutic dilemma remains the group with mild neurological deficits. As failure rates of delayed surgery approach 40%, recent research is focused on predictive models for failure of conservative SEA management. In addition, protocols are being implemented with some success, to shorten the diagnostic delay of SEA on initial presentation. Summary: SEA is a potentially devastating condition that is frequently missed. Protocols are put in place to facilitate early evaluation of back pain in patients with red flags with appropriate cross-sectional imaging, namely contrast-enhanced MRI. Efforts for establishing clear-cut indications for surgical decompression of SEA are underway.
Article
Purpose: We present a case involving an extensive epidural abscess that was successfully treated with computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous needle drainage and systemic antibiotic therapy. Methods: A 44-year-old woman with a history of spine injection procedures complained of severe backache and progressive radiating pain in her right lower extremity followed by sensory deficits in her right lower limb. A laboratory examination revealed leukocytosis and hyperglycemia. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar region revealed an extremely large posterior spinal epidural abscess (SEA) extending from L2 to S2. Because the patient did not respond to intravenous antibiotics alone, she underwent CT-guided percutaneous needle drainage and irrigation. Results: Staphylococcus aureus was detected in the purulent material from this abscess. Her clinical symptoms were dramatically and immediately relieved after this procedure. She achieved complete neurological recovery after 2 months of antibiotic therapy. Conclusion: CT-guided percutaneous needle drainage and irrigation may be a rational treatment choice for patients with SEA with the exception of patients with a chronic abscess, an anterior abscess or discitis.
Article
Background: Spinal epidural abscesses are uncommon but potentially devastating infections that often elude early diagnosis. An increasing incidence has been suggested; however, few contemporary data are available regarding risk factors and epidemiologic trends over time. Methods: A retrospective study of spinal epidural abscesses from 2004 to 2014 at a large academic hospital was conducted. Cases were identified using ICD-9 code 324.1, and a review of medical and radiographic records was performed to confirm each case. Data collected included sociodemographics, medical history, suspected route of infection, treatments, and outcome. Results: The incidence was 5.1 cases for each 10,000 admissions with no significant changes during the study period. The route of infection was identified in 52% of cases, with bacteremia as the most common (26%), followed by recent surgery/procedure (21%) and spinal injection (6%). An identifiable underlying risk factor was present in 84% of cases, most commonly diabetes and intravenous drug use. A causative organism was identified in 84% of cases, most commonly Staphylococcus aureus; methicillin-resistant isolates accounted for 25% of S. aureus cases. All cases received intravenous antibiotic therapy and 73% underwent a drainage procedure. Fifteen percent had an adverse outcome (8% paralysis and 7% death). Conclusions: The incidence of spinal epidural abscesses may be increasing with the current study demonstrating a ≥5-fold higher rate compared with historical data. While the outcome in most cases was favorable, spinal epidural abscesses continue to cause substantial morbidity and mortality and should remain a "not to be missed diagnosis."
Article
Introduction: A spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a medical emergency. Despite urgent surgical intervention and adjuvant antibiotic therapy, neurological prognosis remains variable and guarded. The optimal approach to managing this condition is debated with substantial variability in clinical practice, dependent on patient demographic and pretreatment neurological status as well as radiological appearance. Method: A systematic search in MEDLINE and similar databases was conducted for literature published from 1990 through 2015 using the search term "spinal epidural abscess", limiting the search results to human studies published in the English language. Case series that consisted of fewer than 10 patients were excluded. The evidence strength was graded according to the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. Results: The search yielded 1843 patients from 34 retrospective case series. Ten studies compared surgical and medical management, with no significant difference in patients with good outcome (OR 0.65, p = 0.11) or neurological improvement (OR 1.11, p = 0.69). Failure rates following initial medical management requiring surgical intervention, however, ranged from 10% to 50%. Three of four studies evaluating timing of surgery reported large effect sizes for neurological outcome if early surgery was performed (p < 0.01). Other prognostic factors from a neurologic perspective included admission neurological status, patient age, and diabetes mellitus. Conclusion: Surgery with adjuvant antibiotics remains the optimal treatment for the neurologically symptomatic SEA patient. If antibiotic therapy alone is considered for the neurologically intact patient, we recommend inter-disciplinary medical and surgical consultations with an in-depth dialogue on the potential for failure in isolated medical management and the recommendation for close neurological monitoring.
Article
Object: Delayed or inappropriate treatment of spinal epidural abscess (SEA) can lead to serious morbidity or death. It is a rare event with significant variation in its causes, anatomical locations, and rate of progression. Traditionally the treatment of choice has involved emergency surgical evacuation and a prolonged course of antibiotics tailored to the offending pathogen. Recent publications have advocated antibiotic treatment without surgical decompression in select patient populations. Clearly defining those patients who can be safely treated in this manner remains in evolution. The authors review the current literature concerning the treatment and outcome of SEA to make recommendations concerning what population can be safely triaged to nonoperative management and the optimal timing of surgery. Methods: A PubMed database search was performed using a combination of search terms and Medical Subject Headings, to identify clinical studies reporting on the treatment and outcome of SEA. Results: The literature review revealed 28 original case series containing at least 30 patients and reporting on treatment and outcome. All cohorts were deemed Class III evidence, and in all but two the data were obtained retrospectively. Based on the conclusions of these studies along with selected smaller studies and review articles, the authors present an evidence-based algorithm for selecting patients who may be safe candidates for nonoperative management. Conclusions: Patients who are unable to undergo an operation, have a complete spinal cord injury more than 48 hours with low clinical or radiographic concern for an ascending lesion, or who are neurologically stable and lack risk factors for failure of medical management may be initially treated with antibiotics alone and close clinical monitoring. If initial medical management is to be undertaken the patient should be made aware that delayed neurological deterioration may not fully resolve even after prompt surgical treatment. Patients deemed good surgical candidates should receive their operation as soon as possible because the rate of clinical deterioration with SEA is notoriously unpredictable. Although patients tend to recover from neurological deficits after treatment of SEA, the time point when a neurological injury becomes irreversible is unknown, supporting emergency surgery in those patients with acute findings.
Article
Object: Over the past decade, the incidence of bacterial spinal epidural abscess (SEA) has been increasing. In recent years, studies on this condition have been rampant in the literature. The authors present an 11-year institutional experience with SEA patients. Additionally, through an analysis of the contemporary literature, they provide an update on the challenging and controversial nature of this increasingly encountered condition. Methods: An electronic medical record database was used to retrospectively analyze patients admitted with SEA from January 2001 through February 2012. Presenting symptoms, concurrent conditions, microorganisms, diagnostic modalities, treatments, and outcomes were examined. For the literature search, PubMed was used as the search engine. Studies published from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2013, were critically reviewed. Data from articles on methodology, demographics, treatments, and outcomes were recorded. Results: A total of 106 patients with bacterial SEA were identified. The mean ± SD age of patients was 63.3 ± 13.7 years, and 65.1% of patients were male. Common presenting signs and symptoms were back pain (47.1%) and focal neurological deficits (47.1%). Over 75% of SEAs were in the thoracolumbar spine, and over 50% were ventral. Approximately 34% had an infectious origin. Concurrent conditions included diabetes mellitus (35.8%), vascular conditions (31.3%), and renal insufficiency/dialysis (30.2%). The most commonly isolated organism was Staphylococcus aureus (70.7%), followed by Streptococcus spp. (6.6%). Surgery along with antibiotics was the treatment for 63 (59.4%) patients. Surgery involved spinal fusion for 19 (30.2%), discectomy for 14 (22.2%), and corpectomy for 9 (14.3%). Outcomes were reported objectively; at a mean ± SD follow-up time of 8.4 ± 26 weeks (range 0-192 weeks), outcome was good for 60.7% of patients and poor for 39.3%. The literature search yielded 40 articles, and the authors discuss the result of these studies. Conclusions: Bacterial SEA is an ominous condition that calls for early recognition. Neurological status at the time of presentation is a key factor in decision making and patient outcome. In recent years, surgical treatment has been advocated for patients with neurological deficits and failed response to medical therapy. Surgery should be performed immediately and before 36-72 hours from onset of neurological sequelae. However, the decision between medical or surgical intervention entails individual patient considerations including age, concurrent conditions, and objective findings. An evidence-based algorithm for diagnosis and treatment is suggested.
Article
Spinal epidural abscess is a rare bacterial infection located within the spinal canal. Early diagnosis and rapid treatment are important because of its potential to cause rapidly progressive spinal cord compression and irreversible paralysis. A staphylococcus bacterial infection is the cause in most cases. Treatment includes antibiotics and possible surgical drainage of the abscess. A favorable neurologic outcome correlates with the severity and duration of neurologic deficits before surgery and the timeliness of the chosen intervention. It is important for the critical care nurse to monitor the patient's neurologic status and provide appropriate interventions.