A preview of this full-text is provided by Wiley.
Content available from Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
1. Introduction
Extremely rapid, large, flow-like landslides (as defined by Hungr etal.,2014) are among the most catastrophic
natural hazards on Earth. These landslides are characterized by a deficit between driving and resisting stresses
at the initiation of motion, which results in rapid acceleration. This deficit is gradually reduced during motion
through traction stresses, plastic deformations, heat, and sound, among other forms of energy dissipation, until
the potential energy of the landslide has been fully consumed (Knapp & Krautblatter,2020). If a landslide is
sufficiently large and rapid, the vibrational energy imparted on the earth can be measured by seismographs, with
different landslide types having distinct signal characteristics (e.g., review papers by Allstadt etal., 2018 and
Provost etal.,2018, and references therein). Many of the most seismically energetic landslides are classified as
Abstract Inversion of low-frequency regional seismic records to solve for a time series of bulk forces
exerted on the earth by a landslide (a force-time function) is increasingly being used to infer volumes and
dynamics of large, highly energetic landslides, such as rock avalanches and flowslides, and to provide
calibration information on event dynamics and volumes for numerical landslide runout models. Much of the
work to date using landslide runout modeling constrained by seismic data has focused on using single-phase
models with frictional or velocity-weakening rheologies. Awareness of multistage landslide initiations is
increasing, with discrete failures separated in time contributing to the final impact of an event. Our work
utilizes a method for incorporating seismic data as a calibration constraint for landslide runout models,
considering variable rheologies and different initiation conditions. This study presents a systematic examination
of multiple rheologies and initiation conditions, and shows how these factors affect the force-time function
derived from the landslide runout model. Our work confirms that, while rheology and fragmenting or initially
coherent initiations affect the force-time function, multiple collapses separated by tens of seconds have the
greatest impact on the shape and amplitude. We apply this method to the analysis of three real rock avalanches
to better constrain plausible initiation conditions and rheology parameters using both seismic and field data.
This study provides insights on how assumptions about the initiation dynamics of the source zone and the
runout model definition can aid in the interpretation of seismic inversions for multistage rock avalanches.
Plain Language Summary Understanding how large, rapid landslides move is important to
estimate the dangers posed by these events. Large, rapid landslides impart forces on the surface of the earth
when they accelerate during their initial movement, when they change direction as they follow the terrain along
their runout path, and as they come to rest. These forces generate seismic waves that can be used to estimate
the characteristics of the motion of a landslide. We present an approach for simulating the motion of rapid,
flowing landslides that considers different ways for the material to transition from being at rest to flowing, and
different landslide material representations that affect how the simulated landslide moves once it is in motion.
We then compare the forces estimated from the model of landslide motion with the forces estimated from the
seismic data. Using simulations with simple, idealized terrain and real events with complex terrain, we show
how terrain and different assumptions in the model for landslide motion affect the force estimation. We provide
additional insight on how seismic data can aid in interpreting the way in which motion begins and how a
landslide moves.
MITCHELL ETAL.
© 2022. American Geophysical Union.
All Rights Reserved.
Insights on Multistage Rock Avalanche Behavior From Runout
Modeling Constrained by Seismic Inversions
A. Mitchell1,2 , K. E. Allstadt3 , D. George3 , J. Aaron4, S. McDougall1 , J. Moore5 , and
B. Menounos6
1Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmsopheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
2Now at BGC Engineering Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3U. S. Geological Survey, Golden, CO, USA, 4Swiss Federal
Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Birmensdorf, Switzerland, 5Department of Geology & Geophysics,
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 6Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Northern
British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada
Key Points:
• Different runout model material
representations and initial conditions
were tested to determine their
influence on seismic force estimates
• Real event simulations confirmed
the interplay between material
representation, topography, multistage
failures, and modeled seismic forces
• The magnitude of the simulated peak
forces was most sensitive to failures
separated by tens of seconds
Supporting Information:
Supporting Information may be found in
the online version of this article.
Correspondence to:
A. Mitchell,
AMitchell@bgcengineering.ca
Citation:
Mitchell, A., Allstadt, K. E., George,
D., Aaron, J., McDougall, S., Moore,
J., & Menounos, B. (2022). Insights
on multistage rock avalanche behavior
from runout modeling constrained
by seismic inversions. Journal of
Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,
127, e2021JB023444. https://doi.
org/10.1029/2021JB023444
Received 16 OCT 2021
Accepted 19 SEP 2022
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization: A. Mitchell, K. E.
Allstadt, D. George, S. McDougall
Formal analysis: A. Mitchell, K. E.
Allstadt, D. George, J. Aaron
Investigation: A. Mitchell
Methodology: A. Mitchell, K. E.
Allstadt, D. George, J. Aaron, S.
McDougall
Resources: J. Aaron, S. McDougall, J.
Moore, B. Menounos
Software: A. Mitchell, K. E. Allstadt
Visualization: A. Mitchell
Writing – original draft: A. Mitchell
Writing – review & editing: K.
E. Allstadt, D. George, J. Aaron, S.
McDougall, J. Moore, B. Menounos
10.1029/2021JB023444
RESEARCH ARTICLE
1 of 29